The Value Of This Painting Is Shocking | Antiques Roadshow
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2023
- All valuations were correct at the time of broadcast. This piece by Sir William Beechey, was painted at the turn of the century, around 1800, and now has a surprising value. Hugh Scully and the experts from Antiques Roadshow take a look at some fantastic antiques and the history and stories surrounding them. This clip was filmed in Whitehaven in 1991.
Welcome to the home of Antiques Roadshow on UA-cam. Here you'll find all the best clips from Britain’s most popular antiques appraisal show. From items that have been handed down the generations to those picked up in junk shops, discover their history and delight in the possibility that it could in fact be a priceless treasure.
Subscribe to the channel so that you don’t miss a thing: / @bbcantiquesroadshow
Stream full episodes of Antiques Roadshow on BBC iPlayer: www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode...
This is a commercial channel from BBC Studios. To contact us or provide feedback please visit: www.bbcstudios.com/contact/co...
This is the most British exchange I've ever heard.
2:56 I'm so glad he pointed out the locations of the faces, I couldn't find them at first.
I love the old dears poking about in the back ground.
“ look at that Edna! They cancelled blooming bingo to hold a jumble sale.”
😂
"As much as that, good heavens." Loved the gents British response to the value of his grandmother's painting.
In love with this painting. The portraits are stunning.
They are not white, he's too posh for that I think cream or a very light colour.
The painting is very beautiful.
I love the guy's reaction: going from £5 to £20000 in a second, his only reaction is lifting his eyesbrows.
Sooo british !!
1:30
As a welshman I find both accents really posh.
That's actually the standard British response, £10k / per eyebrow, anything above £20k and he'd need to get his shoulders and hands involved.
very beautiful!
He understood his subjects very well indeed the tell if a good portrait artist. They may have been sisters but in character they were very different. I time travelled and met two people thank you. It should be in a museum for sure and I hope it is.
Stunning painting
Only 30 years ago and they sound so differently posh.
Plenty of people still talk like that
@@johnp515 Horace and Gideon.
According to Wikipedia another of Beechey's family portraits sold for $821,000 in 2014 so the valuation here (£20k in 1991 = about £43k in 2023) is probably pretty conservative if the identification is correct
Not really , prices fluctuate according to trends and tastes in the market over time and some previously sought after and valuable antiques can now be worth not much at all .
@@PhilipKerry Exactly, I don't see many people collecting stamps anymore.
I'm with you on this. I've seen several videos of this appraiser evaluating paintings, and I found all his prices surprisingly low. He said this was in very good condition but it looks quite scuffed and damaged to me. I think it will cost a lot to have repaired, but then I think the big money will appear at auction.
Good for that old chap….
Could be condition issues. The lady on the right seems to have cracks to the oil on canvas
Hi wow 🎉 great art love these
It is a peach of a painting. I'd have that on my wall.
Beauty transcends time :-)
They're good looking people, this is very important 😂😂. British subtlety at its finest
I would love to go on the beer and then to a club with those 2 guys ….. mental
I actually did, ended up in custody after a 6 hour K hole
"Two good looking people this is very important. " Remember if you want your painting to be valuable you must not paint ugly chicks.
It’s nice to have good looking ancestors. But then again, that’s the difference between a painting and a photograph. And a painting you can make somebody look better than they really are.
Bahahaha.
Ignorant.
Who would have thought that Jeremy Clarkson was an art aficionado?🤣
Not everybody with a shocking hairdo isJeremy Clarkson. This man’s teeth are so very much better than mr. Clarksons smoke stained stubs. And he’s knowable on his subject…😉
Certainly not me, and probably only you.
Delicious...
The head of the sister to the right looked rather worn to me, actually missing bits of paint. That's why I think it was somewhat curious to hear the expert say that the painting was in good condition. All things being relative, I guess that as a close to 200 year old painting (at the time), it's been kept quite well.
Ive got one of these in my tiolet
Beautiful piece, soft and feminine.
Oh. I'm so shocked. Wow.
I would love to see Baumgardner Restoration get his hands on that painting to clean off the yellowed resin, repair the damaged areas, and protect it for the future.
Dozens of far more competent conservator companies in the UK without resorting to American hacks.
@@iatsd Professional jealousy?
I agree Baumgardner is my favourite
@@iatsd Oh, yes, for sure!!
@@iatsdwhat’s with the English hate for Americans? It’s really sad and not reciprocated in the least. I feel bad for you holding all that resentment in your heart.
As much as that, he says rather nonchalantly.😳😬👍👍
OTC, that middle hand is the most realized.
I like those black velvet pictures of Elvis
It's absolutely shocking that this painting is worth exactly what we thought it would be.
They look a lot like sisters. Their eyes and the shape of their noses are very similar.
And of course £20,000 back then in what looks like the early 1980’s, would be something like 10x that now in equivalent money, possibly more.
I'm shocked the price was so pedestrian.
Filmed over 30 years ago.
The painting was sweet but certainly had condition issues - The expert assumed it was by Sir William Beechey - It certainly feels like it is from the Regency period - The owner seems almost pleased with the valuation.
“ A “picture” like this. It’s a painting!
Picture is a correct term of use for this object.
The "professional" keeps calling it a "picture".
That's because the professional knows how to speak English and uses the term picture correctly - unlike you, who doesn't seem to understand what the word picture means.
1:10 i kept expecting one of those loud, nosy ladies would knock over the painting
I wasn't shocked in the least.
Not shocked.
15-20k isn’t that shocking. 250k would be “shocking”
I thought he was going to say it was worth 17 million pounds.
He said overall good condition not great not excellent but good
How much in dollars?
He was expecting more
Can you put the estimate in todays money at the end please
Not really possible without an analysis of the art market on top of the money value.
Brit Toff i was hoping it was worth 50p
That painting is also missing the creases and folds of the finger joints. Fingers are NOT smooth lol.
Drew Pritchard, £40 and that's it.
I thought these paintings fetch around $5 million
Just started watching this video but the first thing I noticed was that it is in desperate need of a clean.
After watching this, I can’t think how American film and TV show makers believed all us Brits spoke the way they thought 🤷🏻♂️
No, we know most of you sound like Derek and Clive. We just don't talk about it.
@@garryferrington811 😂
so only attractive people in oil paintings are worth more? quite rude
You should complain to the people who bid for them at auctions. Blatant lookism!
If you look at many of the masterpieces from history, you'll see plenty of "ugly" people depicted.
He is only telling the owner a fact: that pictures of pretty people command more money from those who can afford to buy them. He's not advocating for it.
Real art experts here. Better stick to your garden gnomes.
Petty, petty comment about white socks!! 😩😩
god, old British roadshow is so dull compared to the modern American version. yeesh, what a dull dull painting
So pictures of pretty girls are worth more! Who would have thought it?
Try to find a single person to give you $ 20,000 . Like I'm sure
Maybe it's the light, but the sister on the right looks like she could use a little "cosmetic surgery." Not her looks but the painting seems to need a bit of restoration around her head. I remember seeing Beechey's "George III and the Prince of Wales Reviewing Troops" back in 1974. It was the only painting to be destroyed in the Windsor Castle fire as it was too big and heavy to move (13' 8" x 16' 6")
I'm not sure George III would have been able to review the troops in 1974. LOL.
@@beckenhamrainbow5284 Are you trying to steal my sense of humor? LOL
15/20K is hardly "shocking" now is it !
Compared to the last evaluation which put it at 5 pounds?
Its shocking on the downside -
It's not a bad estimate for a painting in need of expert cleaning and restoration. XXX
In 1991 it was worth far more. On another note the pound in 1971 had the buying power of £18.01 in today’s money. June 2023. 😀
According to one source I looked at 15 K- 20Kin 1991 pounds is now equivalent to about $33,500 to $44,600. So a little more shocking.
I always enjoy your channel, but please stop click-baiting your videos. There's nothing shocking about the evaluation. It's a very nice painting that's over 200 years old. I would certainly expect anything that old, that's this well done, that's survived several wars would certainly be worth thousands of pounds.
I was not shocked.
got to be in the area of milly vanilla… my glock…
#nowadays
What is wrong with all you people?! The expert is wearing light colored socks because he has a problem with his feet! Dark colored socks incubate some foot problems! SHEESH!!
"it wasn't by the famous guy, it was by a lesser known guy. the strokes sort of look shitty and the hands don't make a lot of sense....$20,000"
Weeeeeeeeee
This is one very dirty painting. If it was restored (Baumgarten is the man) I can't image how the colors will pop!
Julian and Kat for the win!
That hand is seriously dodgy...
He definitely did not make a success of it!
Is that all ?? Sure youd lose more then that running for the bus 😊
- shockingly low then? :)
Definitely a low estimate. It's to be expected, I guess. The $800. I paid for a painting 18 yrs ago would just buy its frame now.
32 years ago
Yeeaah shocking...
£15k? with todays inflation that will be a weeks shopping in 5 years time.
The expert is wearing white socks, I could not accept advice from him.
Believe they are cream, that said you have a serious point. 😂
Oh, I say… bad form. Rum do.
Dummies! Some of us can't wear colored socks because it gives us athletes foot ! Duh !
Some would say he's being "sporty". These observations may not be useful for much longer. "Uppity" is going out of style.
England artsy. It is okay, don’t be so picky.
Heresy not proven
Clickbait is a rotten thing! I thought one of the ladies was going to turn out to be Perdita Robinson!
“Shocking value” of 15,000 pounds? Hardly shocking.
32 years ago
is the antiques roadshow youtube channel now employing a few click-bait savvy 20 year olds to write their titles?....I guess those are the times..but Ughhh...
This is USA we don't have pounds except when weighing one self.
click bait heading. 15-2000 is not shocking.
It would be in today's money.
@@s.p.88033:53 hi wow goodluck
Not the nicest portrait Ive ever seen. Its quite flat and the perspective is off.
Of course, I would never be able to do something anywhere near as good ( think stick people or caricatures!). My grandfather was a trained artist, although not commercial or professional, and he'd have done a reasonable job if it.
The shocking part is how boring this video turned out to be
It seems that it's just not British to look "excitable", no matter what.
@@pouglwaw5932 American on the Titanic: We're sinking!!! What'll we do?!?
British person: I wonder if I can trouble the steward for a cuppa.
Hardly "shocking". Too muck Yank hype.