How The Defense Industry Profits From Militarizing The Police

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
  • The defense industry has become a major player in the domestic homeland security market, estimated to be worth over $20 billion in goods and services. Their contributions play a major role in maintaining a steady flow of militarized equipment to local law enforcements. However, lack of oversight has created some deadly consequences.
    » Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/Subscri...
    » Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/Subscri...
    » Subscribe to CNBC Classic: cnb.cx/Subscri...
    About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
    Connect with CNBC News Online
    Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
    Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedI...
    Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
    Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/Instagr...
    Subscribe to CNBC PRO: cnb.cx/2NLi9AN
    #CNBC
    Why Police Pay Nothing For Military Equipment

КОМЕНТАРІ • 650

  • @IvoPurwanto
    @IvoPurwanto 4 роки тому +329

    US Navy gonna replace their carrier
    US Police "hmmmmm"

    • @josafatglenn4482
      @josafatglenn4482 4 роки тому +38

      US Police: hippity hoppity the carrier is now our property

    • @FreshKicks4545
      @FreshKicks4545 4 роки тому

      Sounds like Mexico

    • @rsingh1252
      @rsingh1252 4 роки тому +10

      well obviously they need one for public safety!!! Duhh don't you know fighter jets are the only way to fight against kids holding signs???

    • @yourfriendlyneighborhoodcl4824
      @yourfriendlyneighborhoodcl4824 3 роки тому

      @@rsingh1252 More like kids holding a gun

    • @elieverett5608
      @elieverett5608 3 роки тому

      instablaster.

  • @Dolphintravel-DCG
    @Dolphintravel-DCG 4 роки тому +238

    US NAVY: we don’t need aircraft carrier anymore
    Police: Thanks a lot...

  • @alecingersoll4589
    @alecingersoll4589 4 роки тому +122

    Us navy- we got an old submarine here if ya want it.
    Us police- we can take it off your hands

    • @explosivemodesonicmauricet1597
      @explosivemodesonicmauricet1597 3 роки тому

      Everybody gangsta until the police fill up ICBM warheads with tear gas,then install it in the submarines.

  • @lanzortiz3199
    @lanzortiz3199 4 роки тому +89

    Police arrive on the scene by jumping out from a C-17 😂

    • @lairdriver
      @lairdriver 4 роки тому +4

      The new Friday night Paddy wagon lol.

    • @thekingminn
      @thekingminn 4 роки тому +7

      Police land on the beaches of Florida with LCU

    • @leiloan7677
      @leiloan7677 4 роки тому +4

      "yeah so we've created a special police paratroopers unit so we can arrest more easily people who commits jaywalking"

  • @Otter-Destruction
    @Otter-Destruction 4 роки тому +68

    US Marines: Time disband our tank battalions
    Police: Tanks you say?

    • @thelonewanderingsolesurviv2963
      @thelonewanderingsolesurviv2963 3 роки тому +1

      @Raymond Lopez if they didn't they wouldn't exist anymore.

    • @Cooldude-ko7ps
      @Cooldude-ko7ps 3 роки тому

      @@thelonewanderingsolesurviv2963 how so?

    • @Aaleg
      @Aaleg 2 роки тому

      Nothing like firing APFDS rounds at unarmed protesters

  • @theodoreolson8529
    @theodoreolson8529 4 роки тому +73

    Feels like I'm watching Robo Cop.

    • @garmenlin5990
      @garmenlin5990 4 роки тому +7

      At least Robo Cops isn't programmed with any form of bias.

    • @khangsector
      @khangsector 4 роки тому

      "No, Daniels. Bad cop, Robocop." - Jack Lewis, RoboCop 2014.

    • @JHaupt6314
      @JHaupt6314 3 роки тому

      Defund the police! Replace them with compassionate social workers. They will be able to deal with the misguided element in society. Simple minds = simple solutions.

    • @theodoreolson8529
      @theodoreolson8529 3 роки тому

      @@JHaupt6314 I'm near the front of the line for those who thing police unions, contracts, and practices protect bad cops from discipline. I believe the culture needs to change. That said, getting rid of the police is idiotic. Never going to happen so why not get behind a more realistic plan that might actually succeed?

  • @48grainsoffreedom
    @48grainsoffreedom 4 роки тому +76

    Military: anyone wearing or operating this should be completely physically fit. It could be mishandled and can be dangerous without training.
    Police: 250lbs officer who did 40 days of training 20 years ago, can do it for free if you will.

  • @kiraasuka9943
    @kiraasuka9943 4 роки тому +22

    Same logic. How defense industry profited from upgrading their contracts with US military.

  • @kajto1941
    @kajto1941 3 роки тому +10

    Us air force: im going to retire our f2-
    Police: gimme some

  • @chasesteele
    @chasesteele 4 роки тому +56

    Can someone show me the link about police killing a African American every 40 hours? I have no idea where that stat comes from

    • @seanszk
      @seanszk 4 роки тому +37

      probably just a bias study made by collage students

    • @antonv1730
      @antonv1730 4 роки тому +28

      It's probably true but it includes justified killings of gang members and armed criminals, not just unjustified killings of unarmed civilians.

    • @urinfamousr79
      @urinfamousr79 4 роки тому +11

      It's made up that's why

    • @svanderheijden7967
      @svanderheijden7967 4 роки тому +15

      266 African Americans killed in 2016. That roughly one every 33 hours (8760/266) www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database.

    • @timkbirchico8542
      @timkbirchico8542 4 роки тому +4

      @@svanderheijden7967 good response man. USA whites are mostly in denial

  • @mrlaydback11
    @mrlaydback11 4 роки тому +15

    We have been at war for over 20 years. It could only be expected some of the equipment would be sold domestically.

    • @carfreeneoliberalgeorgisty5102
      @carfreeneoliberalgeorgisty5102 3 роки тому +1

      I don't understand why they can't just give it to NATO and other US allied countries militaries like Taiwan, South Korea, Canada, UK, and Latvia.

    • @Nayo_The_Mayo
      @Nayo_The_Mayo 3 роки тому +1

      Taiwan and other nato countries are more interested in making their own equipment and the Armoured vehicles could be sold but in my opinion more militarized police actually change the minds of criminals who want to rob banks as they would expect an M1 Abram coming in to murder them

    • @jamesevans938
      @jamesevans938 3 роки тому +1

      @@carfreeneoliberalgeorgisty5102 I'm sure NATO countries had the option to buy some stuff but the counties that might consider buying expensive American equipment like the UK and Canada possibly south Korea and Taiwan are most likely going to buy brand new equipment instead of second hand while Latvia and the majority of NATO countries most likely don't have lot of money to start of with and well the American equipment is still rather expensive so while they might buy some American equipment such as guns but with vehicle they might make themselves for by cheap second hand vehicles from Russia because Russia doesn't really care who they sell thier old vehicles so what else are is the department of defence either scrap them or offer police who need armoured vehicles yes they dont need mine resistant vehicles but hey armoured vechiles specifically made for swat teams are expensive so of course they are going to buy a cheap vehicle that are better than the vehicles designed for teams

  • @richardtruckner2203
    @richardtruckner2203 4 роки тому +48

    Why do you keep taking down comments... comments which are factual and easy to fact check !

    • @SpeakChinglish
      @SpeakChinglish 4 роки тому +2

      What did they take down?

    • @lelvey9851
      @lelvey9851 4 роки тому +3

      its youtube dude. they sense hurtful comments etc

  • @XOPOIIIO
    @XOPOIIIO 4 роки тому +11

    Maybe they have to criticise crime, rather than police response to the crime.

  • @teddywong5775
    @teddywong5775 4 роки тому +15

    THATS WHY NO MONEY FOR SCHOOL.

    • @mirjanavuletic4762
      @mirjanavuletic4762 4 роки тому

      Just imagine if Police not around ,your kid not gone need school, you will sh*** your pants when you go out😘

    • @marcorodrigues8303
      @marcorodrigues8303 4 роки тому +1

      @@mirjanavuletic4762 Cadeia neles todos. Eu dou o meu aval .

    • @lelvey9851
      @lelvey9851 4 роки тому

      school shootings?

    • @konigstiger3252
      @konigstiger3252 4 роки тому

      Pay for your own education

    • @JHaupt6314
      @JHaupt6314 3 роки тому

      Simple solution - sell the equipment to the criminals and give the money to the schools. Simple minds = simple solutions.

  • @ohhimark8028
    @ohhimark8028 4 роки тому +10

    What’s the problem with police having good equipment, especially if they get it free secondhand from the military? Unless you’re a terrorist, that shouldn’t affect you. It anything, having superior equipment should deter criminals from violently engaging them

    • @marcorodrigues8303
      @marcorodrigues8303 4 роки тому +1

      Ver bem de onde saiu a Ordem de tudo isso e em que lugar se procedeu isso. Te garanto que de mim não foi pois ele nunca me not a mim e nem o Lugar. Procure saber .de onde partiu tudo isso.

    • @tacticalblue669
      @tacticalblue669 4 роки тому

      Legit.

    • @KeepYourSWORDInYourHand
      @KeepYourSWORDInYourHand 4 роки тому +1

      @Marcus another silly man that doesn't know what defund the police means. If I were to tell you, you would double down on stupid, so I won't bother.

  • @desgildanphi8825
    @desgildanphi8825 4 роки тому +52

    When the people fight back with their own guns don’t ask why

    • @adityasahani4321
      @adityasahani4321 4 роки тому +13

      That will never happen lol. The protesters are against guns

    • @legalize.brokkoli
      @legalize.brokkoli 4 роки тому +4

      When people make idiotic comments on YT videos don't ask why

    • @happyyardservice2914
      @happyyardservice2914 4 роки тому +1

      @@adityasahani4321 hahahahahahah

    • @desgildanphi8825
      @desgildanphi8825 4 роки тому +1

      Burnt Weenie that everyday starts accepting it

    • @kwamebushman606
      @kwamebushman606 4 роки тому +3

      you lost the privilege for that ball a LOOOOONG time ago mate. They have much bigger guns, much bigger nukes and everything.

  • @chrisjong8412
    @chrisjong8412 4 роки тому +35

    Happy to live in Amsterdam, home of the free and safe with a 180 nationalities in this city who all get along

    • @balyeetbhagaloe6416
      @balyeetbhagaloe6416 4 роки тому +17

      For real its pathetic how Americans are brainwashed to think that they live in a free country while really their corrupt government isnt even hiding the fact that their system is corrupt

    • @turkolino
      @turkolino 4 роки тому +6

      ​@@balyeetbhagaloe6416 There is corruption everywhere. Americans think they live in a free country because they are indeed free to pursuit any path they so desire. Politicians aren' big fans of those liberties. You know, those in power don't want to give even more power to those that they rule over. Since the Civil Rights movement, no one in the US was legally discriminated based on race, gender or religion. Just because the US is being used as the biggest frontline of a political war between two very different ideologies, doesn't mean that the American people isn't free. Being free and being inconsequent are two different things.

    • @dnguyen787
      @dnguyen787 4 роки тому

      @@turkolino I'd think you're describing communist China!:-)

    • @Dankman9
      @Dankman9 4 роки тому +6

      @@turkolino "Since the Civil Rights movement, no one in the US was legally discriminated based on race, gender or religion." False

    • @erniellerena
      @erniellerena 4 роки тому +2

      Do you guys get in a circle, hold hands and sing Kumbaya or Its a small world? People like you are so full of it. You literally think that what you have is because of you. Lol.

  • @ParanaSlim52
    @ParanaSlim52 3 роки тому +9

    We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. - Barack Obama

  • @PosiP
    @PosiP 4 роки тому +11

    what about the cop not allowed to legally own the military equipment.

  • @Jaytrankle3979
    @Jaytrankle3979 4 роки тому +13

    Police don’t need military equipment.

    • @mirjanavuletic4762
      @mirjanavuletic4762 4 роки тому

      yes they do ,even machine-guns

    • @SS-_.1
      @SS-_.1 4 роки тому

      may be every other person carrying a gun is the issue. that the police feel they need to be protected from such citizens who carry weapons. Also I don't think outside of a country in civil war its just USA that allows citizens to be soo well armed. It's not just the guns its the citizens mentality too here. Cause if you see Israel and Swiss citizens to have weapons at home. But they are less for defending against the imaginary tyranny of the govt and more about actual national defence.

  • @henk-3098
    @henk-3098 4 роки тому +6

    Well I can understand that police forces need military grade weapons in certain special situations like school shootings, hostage situations and counteracting criminal organisations. But those should be the absolute exception, not the norm. The police in the first place is there to provide order and peace and make people feel safe in their own communities, using armored vehicles, body armor and assault rifles are making people more afraid and angry and doesn't make them feel safe.

  • @JHaupt6314
    @JHaupt6314 4 роки тому +6

    This is the type of reporting I would expect to come from CNBC . . .

    • @pinkflamingo7324
      @pinkflamingo7324 3 роки тому +3

      As somebody from outside of the US, I just wonder what do folks expect. Criminals are violent so do police. Ez math.

    • @F-Raptor-mq7ph
      @F-Raptor-mq7ph 3 роки тому +1

      @@pinkflamingo7324 The cops act like ALL people are violent and just go off around shooting people and choking them and stuff

    • @pinkflamingo7324
      @pinkflamingo7324 3 роки тому

      @@F-Raptor-mq7ph that is other side of the problem

    • @user-uw5ut8cy8e
      @user-uw5ut8cy8e 3 роки тому

      @@F-Raptor-mq7ph that has nothing to do with police militarization

  • @yutakago1736
    @yutakago1736 3 роки тому +4

    Previously, old military equipment from USA end up with a dictatorship government in another country. Now they end up with in a police department near your home.

  • @byronwatkins2565
    @byronwatkins2565 4 роки тому +14

    Military gear wouldn't be so bad if 1) the police only used it to enforce the laws and 2) actually bothered to learn the laws.

    • @lelvey9851
      @lelvey9851 4 роки тому +1

      Byron Watkins they do. depends on what agency. as well as what officer. they risk their life everyday on the job. although the bad ones definitely should not be in the job on the first place.

    • @farhanrizkiahnafa7404
      @farhanrizkiahnafa7404 3 роки тому

      @@lelvey9851 But supervision is still weak

  • @economicsinaction
    @economicsinaction 4 роки тому +9

    As a European it's just crazy to see police with such weaponry

    • @urinfamousr79
      @urinfamousr79 4 роки тому +4

      U should see the weapons the criminals have ... you would be thanking the police for having such equipment

  • @TheDjgarjoel
    @TheDjgarjoel 4 роки тому +6

    This is the stupidity of a people trying to get profits out of a situation that needs to be heard from both sides not just one.

    • @nokilhot3550
      @nokilhot3550 4 роки тому +1

      Even if there is a profit, police need to have an advantage over criminals, as there are fewer cops than bad guys. That means that we need a big advantage, so less innocent blue lives go down than bad guys.

  • @joshuaperkings5155
    @joshuaperkings5155 4 роки тому +18

    Conservatives be like "we want small and limited government". Ok lets start by addressing police brutality and assuring the state is not enabling them too much power to terrorize our communities. Conservatives: "No police should have the most power possible in their means and access to every weapon possible, we are all for a police state".

    • @krinos1
      @krinos1 4 роки тому +2

      Yeah but civilians can also get whatever gun they want

    • @pauld.b7129
      @pauld.b7129 4 роки тому +1

      Idk... Democrats have been signing off on the exact same things. And yet they claim to want to "defund the police". Probably a bigger hypocrisy really. To fund the police while you pretend to want to defund them 🤣

    • @toade1583
      @toade1583 3 роки тому +1

      @@krinos1 no they can't, they can only get semi autos

  • @Rommie26
    @Rommie26 4 роки тому +13

    Love how you guys interviewed liberal betas but didn’t interview any police chiefs on why they actually need that equipment 🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @TheDexsword
      @TheDexsword 4 роки тому

      ?? Like if the police deem the situation is needed that kind of firepower don't let the police handle call the military.
      Literally other first world country does this.

    • @TheDexsword
      @TheDexsword 4 роки тому

      Do we need an anti mine vehicles in a fcking bumfuck nowhere? Like rly???

    • @antonv1730
      @antonv1730 4 роки тому

      Anti-mine vehicles are used in the bomb squad to dispose of explosive ordinance.

  • @123blakes8
    @123blakes8 4 роки тому +14

    This video is so one sided

  • @oweng8808
    @oweng8808 4 роки тому +14

    This is why you have to take out a second loan when you brake you leg

  • @pabloaleatorio
    @pabloaleatorio 2 роки тому +4

    I, as a Brazilian, thank every day for the militarization of the police in Brazil, it increased our security by 100%

  • @randomguyontheinternet6444
    @randomguyontheinternet6444 4 роки тому +13

    Well maybe if the rioters weren’t well ya know rioting they wouldn’t have to use the stuff

  • @DarienDragonFox
    @DarienDragonFox 4 роки тому +19

    If ill be honest. Russia has tanks with their police. Im quite jelous we dont have any

    • @possiblyadickhead6653
      @possiblyadickhead6653 4 роки тому +1

      That are apc's tho, not tanks. Although they have heavy machine guns.

    • @DarienDragonFox
      @DarienDragonFox 4 роки тому

      @@possiblyadickhead6653 i know, it was just easier to call em that i believe its the btr if im correct

  • @Predestinated1
    @Predestinated1 4 роки тому +7

    I respect police officers! 😊 The police is liked and respected in Germany, unless in shithole USA

  • @itsPhD
    @itsPhD 4 роки тому +6

    Don't commit crime and you will likely never see an officer.

    • @nortonnewmann3711
      @nortonnewmann3711 4 роки тому

      Like... don't be black and you won't get killed by a cop...🥺😳 Or... I have a job, why don't YOU go out and get one?

  • @abdulmohsinali2669
    @abdulmohsinali2669 4 роки тому +10

    What happened to America
    I don't see any difference between America and Mexico

    • @JohnSkyLey
      @JohnSkyLey 4 роки тому +2

      Citizens in Mexico can't own weapons. At least here we can defend ourselves.

  • @MusicAutomation
    @MusicAutomation 4 роки тому +5

    When 1 star in GTA is now equivalent to 5 stars

  • @Zer0Mood
    @Zer0Mood 3 роки тому +5

    What yall need to realize is that times have changed. Criminals are no longer just using pistols, they're using grenades and automatic rifles. Our Law Enforcment/Public Defenders need to keep up with the times. It's not "Militarizing" just because the military uses similar equipment. Our police need vests so they don't get killed when criminals shoot them. They need rifles so they can reach criminals from a distance who are armed. They prefer carriers for their equipment because duty belts ruin your back. They have cannister launchers to launch smoke and flash cannisters into buildings when there's a criminal barricaded inside.
    They're not "militarized." They're simply equipped to deal with the ever growing threats in America.

  • @blankuser1321
    @blankuser1321 4 роки тому +4

    Its pretty hard to become a swat officer, but if said does become one, it is hard training and they would have to prove it to stay on the team. Theres nothing wrong with this. Armed crimes are going up. You dont want something like that one guy in canada killing all those undertrained RCMP officers. Because now another biased news would complain.

    • @calvincollins-knapp1167
      @calvincollins-knapp1167 4 роки тому

      No. Each city need 1 swat team. That is it. Normal officers should be unarmed. Eliminate the 1033 and 1122 programs.

    • @blankuser1321
      @blankuser1321 4 роки тому

      @@calvincollins-knapp1167 That would be really messed up. Cops could get killed anywhere. Have you not seen the recent shootings? SWAT will take too long to respond. From the station to an area where the cops already dead could take over 20 minutes depending on where they are. That is too dangerous, especially how easy anybody any age can grab a gun.

  • @greenesyt563
    @greenesyt563 11 місяців тому

    UN: throw the nukes we don't need them to make the world a safer place.
    US police: Lets go boys new toy to play with.

  • @darkpenguin1978
    @darkpenguin1978 4 роки тому +2

    Education in black communities must be a priority

    • @acommentator69
      @acommentator69 4 роки тому +3

      You don't pay any taxes but want all of our tax money for schools.

    • @bob-wx4po
      @bob-wx4po 4 роки тому

      Why just black communities

  • @FinancialShinanigan
    @FinancialShinanigan 4 роки тому +11

    Because the taxpayers paid for them.

  • @williamwhite5825
    @williamwhite5825 4 роки тому +6

    For anyone interested look up the LA bank Shootout that is when most police departments started getting more high powered equipment not before. So the video gets its facts wrong.

    • @themedicalmarvels
      @themedicalmarvels 4 роки тому +1

      Believe a commenter named William or believe CNBC? Hmmm.....

    • @BabylonianWealthTips
      @BabylonianWealthTips 4 роки тому

      I’m going with CNBC...sorry William 😂

    • @williamwhite5825
      @williamwhite5825 4 роки тому +1

      LA Bank shoot out, 1997 police were armed with shotguns and pistols unable to stop the violent and deadly robbers. Who wore body armor and outgunned the police for 44min until the arrival of swat. Police were forced to borrow weapons from local gun stores in an attempt to match the firepower of the robbers.
      This occurred on Feb 28th, 1997
      In 1997 as of October 1st, all police departments were now able to gain surplus military equipment. Cause and effect as beforehand it had been severely limited to agencies directly involved in interdicting the drug trade.
      I'm not saying they are completely wrong but they did miss the big turning event.

    • @williamwhite5825
      @williamwhite5825 4 роки тому +1

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Hollywood_shootout

    • @themedicalmarvels
      @themedicalmarvels 4 роки тому

      I believe you feel what you say is true and is relevant to the video. I personally feel that CNBC has done the appropriate research prior to releasing the video.

  • @firststrike4810
    @firststrike4810 3 роки тому +1

    Don't De-fund Police De-Militarize Police and Secure our Borders!

  • @locnguyen97
    @locnguyen97 4 роки тому +16

    "And does the gear help keep communities safe?" sure, cause your communities also have guns and all types of "self-defense" equipment

    • @benhaley9811
      @benhaley9811 4 роки тому +1

      Ok, the public have sniper rifles and tanks? Behave

    • @locnguyen97
      @locnguyen97 4 роки тому

      @@benhaley9811 to effectively take care of violent riot and reduce risk to the polices, would you bring polices with same types of guns and lets them fight like CS:GO?? Or you overpower them with better equipments??

    • @tacticalblue669
      @tacticalblue669 4 роки тому +3

      @@benhaley9811 The "Militarization" of police started after shootings like columbine and the Hollywood shootout. They needed officers to stop active shooters and be able to handle them. That is why we see officers with rifles and shotguns.
      They also need armored vehicles to safely protect officers and the public from high-risk situations.
      If we don't want them to have this stuff, then do not expect them to try to stop active shooters, hostage situations, etc.

    • @kurousagi8155
      @kurousagi8155 4 роки тому

      ben haley actually the public have access to systems that are referred to as “sniper rifles”. Those are generally legal without license.
      The only real federal limitations to arms ownership at the moment is the need for a type of license to own automatic weapons and other “destructive devices”. Though some older automatic weapons can be owned through an antiquity license.

    • @benhaley9811
      @benhaley9811 4 роки тому

      @@locnguyen97 police should not be overpowering anyone.. they are police, not terminators. It's mad that the mindset in Yankeedoodle is still focused on "overpowering". Why not have some rules which work and a system which incentivises people to work hard rather than be criminals. Rest of the world seems to get it to work alright. Thought Vietnam would've taught that "overpowering" simply doesn't work.

  • @ncrdisabled
    @ncrdisabled 4 роки тому +7

    the criminals have them why not the police?

    • @notjoerogan
      @notjoerogan 4 роки тому +5

      Criminals have armored vehicles? lol

    • @toade1583
      @toade1583 3 роки тому

      A) No they don't B) the police aren't well trained and abuse their power often, it's military equipment, call in the National guard when the threat gets real, not the police

  • @fiddy5ive330
    @fiddy5ive330 4 роки тому +10

    I don’t know why they are even talking about this the police need this stuff with how dangerous USA is

  • @hmong_keeb_kwm
    @hmong_keeb_kwm 4 роки тому +12

    Is simply rich contract profits...
    Everything is money MONEY...

  • @BayAreaPolice
    @BayAreaPolice Рік тому +1

    0:48
    Source: Trust me bro

  • @thecanvass6555
    @thecanvass6555 4 роки тому +6

    Please make a video on Indian media's favouritism towards the ruling Modi government

  • @LuisMendoza-pp9qi
    @LuisMendoza-pp9qi 4 роки тому +3

    And where was this equipment during the Looting?!?! Where was the Armoured vehicles??

    • @Cooldude-ko7ps
      @Cooldude-ko7ps 3 роки тому +1

      I know right? It’s probably because if the police actually responded with force against the rioters and looters they’d get called racist, etc. or the police chiefs would get into trouble with their superiors.

    • @LuisMendoza-pp9qi
      @LuisMendoza-pp9qi 3 роки тому +1

      @@Cooldude-ko7ps Because of that..... Thousand of stores were ransacked, from big box stores from mum-and-pop stores already struggling to survive

    • @Cooldude-ko7ps
      @Cooldude-ko7ps 3 роки тому

      @@LuisMendoza-pp9qi yup.

  • @Loveandyoutube
    @Loveandyoutube 4 роки тому +1

    This seems off.... Possible a deeper explanation may be needed.

  • @Lumberjack-fr6ve
    @Lumberjack-fr6ve 4 роки тому +7

    Ok but how do I profit of this

    • @buttercrazy30
      @buttercrazy30 4 роки тому

      Start selling anti 5G usb pen drive for military use and then lobby to national FOP who will give you millions in federal grant.

    • @Lumberjack-fr6ve
      @Lumberjack-fr6ve 4 роки тому

      @@buttercrazy30 I meant more in the stock market way but Good idea lol

    • @mirjanavuletic4762
      @mirjanavuletic4762 4 роки тому

      Having a nice dream 😂😂😂

  • @Sdjejdijdjxudhd
    @Sdjejdijdjxudhd 4 роки тому +6

    The video is missing the following:
    An introduction
    States oversight, if certain States are sensible or do all go all out?
    Compare to other developed countries in type of equipments, is this normal or anormal?
    How much impact did 9/11 turn the police into military ? As there is the seminar this was a turning point.

    • @Azivegu
      @Azivegu 4 роки тому +1

      With regards to 9/11, there was an increase in police spending and presence, but the militarization only occurred much later. Before then it was much more focused on individual tasks forces with a detailed operation description.
      And compared to other countries, the difference is wild.As an American living in the Netherlands, I have only seen smoke grenades used once in combination with police horses. The use of tear gas, rubber bullets, stun grenades, etc. is practically unheard of. Not just in the Netherlands, but across most of Europe. I would also like to point out that shotguns and tear gas being used in war time is deemed a war crime as it inflicts unwarranted harm that mostly effects bystanders.
      For oversight it is a bit complicated. But in general there are few, if any, oversight organizations in the US. It isn't uncommon for police departments to not even know how to coordinate with neighboring departments. The main oversight organization is the FBI, but that is mostly limited to investigations of misconduct, but it isn't super effective atm.

    • @tacticalblue669
      @tacticalblue669 4 роки тому +1

      The Militarization of police started after shootings like columbine and the Hollywood shootout. They needed officers to stop active shooters and be able to handle them. That is why we see officers with rifles and shotguns.
      They also need armored vehicles to safely protect officers and the public from high risk situations.

  • @CVal012
    @CVal012 4 роки тому +2

    Having a weak police force doesn't help either. Go to some countries in where the police is barely equipped against gangs that have military type fire power. Other countries' citizens would be glad to have a capable police force. Some course correction is needed but the propaganda a lot of news outlets are trying to pass is wrong. They are making it seems like policing is a bad thing. It's appalling to see the idea of no police or banning them is even a topic of discussion. You are supporting willingly many individuals that would love this to happen so they cannot be bothered in their evil activities. Are the people shooting every weekend in some cities that I won't name going to voluntarily return their guns most likely illegal ones? Are you CNBC going to spend as much energy raising awareness to ask people to stop engaging in illegal activities, shooting others over nothing, etc. CNBC you have to put your effort towards that to, raising awareness for people to reject or abandon illegal activities, homicides, drugs dealing, etc and then you ll have a society that will need less police patrolling.

    • @davedevriesnl
      @davedevriesnl 4 роки тому +2

      Speaking from an European view of point, it is bad and you definitely don’t need to militarise your police. We’re doing just fine over here without heavily armed policemen. And when there’s terrorism or a gang with a ‘military fire power’, the army is able to support and assist the police. Just like your army is doing against protesters.

    • @mountainman6172
      @mountainman6172 4 роки тому

      I am going to treat your prattle with the contempt it deserves: *Bootlicker*

    • @LeeeroyJenkins
      @LeeeroyJenkins 2 роки тому

      @@davedevriesnl Almost every European country has almost double the amount of officers per capita than the United States.

  • @immcguyver07
    @immcguyver07 4 роки тому

    One day, I saw a SHOPLIFTER at a GROCERY STORE get arrested. The cops sent a SWAT team. They brandished AK-47s in a crowded shopping center around kids ..... just to pick up a kid for SHOPLIFTING.

    • @rn-zu5ld
      @rn-zu5ld 4 роки тому

      Totally not overkill

    • @immcguyver07
      @immcguyver07 4 роки тому

      @@rn-zu5ld Stepping on the guys neck with an army boot was so not either. No joke. Oh, and me staring down the barrel of an AK when he swung it past me as a bystander wasn't either.

  • @rodneyfosdick3293
    @rodneyfosdick3293 4 роки тому +1

    I don’t think they need all this but the gun debate for me is I’d rather have it and not need it then need it and not have it

  • @krzeszewski
    @krzeszewski 2 роки тому +2

    yes! lets keep our heros safe. i want police officers protected against violence of the aggressive delusional mob. we as a society own that to the heros who protect us.

    • @pepsi_man4962
      @pepsi_man4962 2 роки тому

      Exactly. Militarization of the police is necessary. Especially today. The way people are rioting and killing cops for no reason. There is a clear cut reason why the police need to be militarized

  • @daviddwhit3225
    @daviddwhit3225 4 роки тому +3

    All weapons are lethal

  • @robludacer1331
    @robludacer1331 4 роки тому +4

    Narration kinda reminds me of 'the Art of Film'

  • @abelflores1593
    @abelflores1593 2 роки тому +1

    More like that's taxpayers money paying

  • @alextran2526
    @alextran2526 4 роки тому +6

    i want to see theses stats cause they sound as inflated a a high school students GPA

  • @DhrubajyotiRaja01
    @DhrubajyotiRaja01 4 роки тому +3

    Developed Country: Defund the Police.💰💰
    Developing Countries: Raise the fund of Police.💲💲💲
    Poor Countries: We don't even have Police.💱💱💱
    Democracy is surely Failing. China is somewhere right Democracy is 'Outdated'.

  • @Puzzoozoo
    @Puzzoozoo 4 роки тому +1

    What could possibly go wrong.

  • @lorenzmuller3542
    @lorenzmuller3542 4 роки тому +12

    Bodycams would help...

    • @williamwhite5825
      @williamwhite5825 4 роки тому +5

      Interesting fact body cameras didn't decrease the number of police abuse reports, yet the number of police being charged with crimes dropped 70% on average per department with the introduction of body cameras.

    • @lachlanp4198
      @lachlanp4198 4 роки тому +3

      @@williamwhite5825 cameras cant lie

    • @joseaguilera1609
      @joseaguilera1609 4 роки тому +2

      @@williamwhite5825 Why isn't the footage made public?

    • @kurousagi8155
      @kurousagi8155 4 роки тому

      Body Cams cost local and state governments money. Surplus military gear given to police is free for local and state governments, paid for by federal tax dollars.

  • @MrBrownstick
    @MrBrownstick 4 роки тому +1

    You know why because we are living in a prison.

  • @burung81
    @burung81 4 роки тому +1

    100m lobbyist cost to get 20b, it is small drop. Election is expensive affair and thus lobbyist has lot of sway. does this represent people interest or elite/money owner interest??

  • @DancingDivasMaj
    @DancingDivasMaj Рік тому +1

    This "news" channel is SOOO BIAS

  • @KimmyVG11
    @KimmyVG11 4 роки тому +2

    So happy I live in Singapore

    • @erniellerena
      @erniellerena 4 роки тому

      Bahahaha me too. I am happy you live there.

    • @acommentator69
      @acommentator69 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah I like getting whiped for littering too

    • @KimmyVG11
      @KimmyVG11 4 роки тому

      A Commentator I presume you are American

    • @erniellerena
      @erniellerena 4 роки тому

      @@acommentator69 Lol

    • @carfreeneoliberalgeorgisty5102
      @carfreeneoliberalgeorgisty5102 3 роки тому

      That's because you hate our freedoms. Singapore is a communist country.

  • @JohnSmith-oe5rx
    @JohnSmith-oe5rx 4 роки тому

    American police isn’t militarized, American police simply has gotten out of hand since American society has done the same. It has to do with guns, and things which have happened in America over the decades. North hollywood is just a little example, and the cartels and more.

  • @bhupendranathmahato1378
    @bhupendranathmahato1378 4 роки тому +1

    They are lacking the responsibility thing

  • @mrtek8095
    @mrtek8095 4 роки тому +9

    I swear the guy narrating this vid talks so fast and dramatically they are like one of the people in ads

    • @susanhainan188
      @susanhainan188 4 роки тому

      Jon Luc Robertson Louw I can feel the saliva forming in his mouth when he speaks

    • @redchyshumsalzvip9587
      @redchyshumsalzvip9587 4 роки тому

      lol ur ryt. Plus demman talking v dramatically

  • @gcb345
    @gcb345 4 роки тому

    I saw another UA-cam video that showed were American cops only get a couple of months training. In the U.K., they get 3 years of training with a strong emphasis on DE-ESCALATING a problem. Most British cops will only pull out a gun if they're on the range.

  • @bengonzalez4032
    @bengonzalez4032 4 роки тому +2

    If you don’t wanna serve your country and end up taking journalism, don’t disrespect the heroes who serve and protect... periodT

  • @arturohernandezjr5164
    @arturohernandezjr5164 4 роки тому +9

    This reporters find it so easy to deamonize the police, when they don't live and thus don't know how dangerous this neighborhoods are. They come talk trash and thenleave to their nice save suburban neighborhoods...

  • @christophermcnair1541
    @christophermcnair1541 3 роки тому

    I thought this was about the militarization of the police not about blacks being killed by cops. Why was that even put into this video, make literally no since.

    • @ano3758
      @ano3758 3 роки тому

      Because it always affects minorities first but eventually a militarized police force will affect the entire nation and by then its too late to change it.

  • @daviddwhit3225
    @daviddwhit3225 4 роки тому +2

    Try being a police officer for 1 year and you will see how much you need A gun

  • @seth_deegan
    @seth_deegan 4 роки тому

    Where just a small portion of our *massive* defense budget goes...

  • @btbees1
    @btbees1 4 роки тому

    US Police departments are militarized, trained by the Israeli IDF, and they are Racist. What could possibly go wrong?

  • @SS-_.1
    @SS-_.1 4 роки тому

    It's a chronology. There is a incident that causes a police fatality by a armed civilian. There is a public outcry and reports and suggestions. The authorities follow the advises and implement the suggestions to save their position. Police get better equipped. then another incident occurs and there is a fatality of civilian killed by a police. There is public outcry and reports and suggestions. Again the authorities follow the advises and implement the suggestions to save their position. Now the police equipment is taken away. Another incident occurs. And it goes on and on. like a pendulum.

  • @alansohn855
    @alansohn855 4 роки тому

    If there wasn't a need, the local and federal law enforcement agencies wouldn't have acquired the equipment. Now with increased rates in crime in all sectors ranging from cyber attacks, warrants to mass shooting, this equipment is vital so the officer is safe. Especially now with the riots, more than ever are the bearcats, tactical clothing and equipment vital. Also what's interesting when Thomas Nolan said about the gear makes people outraged and feared, people have their own train of thought and can decide how they should act. It's obvious that they're law enforcement because of the badges and text that says which law enforcement agency they're from, they got the equipment so they don't get hurt and can control a crowd. Yes people have the right to protest, but others have the right to protect themselves and their property, Law Enforcement is to Protect and to serve. Serving the public and not hurt anyone yes, but they also have the duty to protect their jurisdiction whether it's corporate or a neighbourhood home.

  • @jackrundkvist1899
    @jackrundkvist1899 3 роки тому +2

    The police isent militarized

  • @leogarcia8640
    @leogarcia8640 3 роки тому +5

    They should REALLY look at Russian police

  • @3rKoPlaysMinecraft
    @3rKoPlaysMinecraft 4 роки тому +3

    Paint it blue and we're good, green=military, blue=police

  • @CyberspacedLoner
    @CyberspacedLoner 4 роки тому +4

    Military Industrial Complex Speech by US President Dwight David Eisenhower from 1960

  • @Tiger1x1
    @Tiger1x1 3 роки тому +1

    The biggest mistake of America is belief in this foolish proverb " the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with the gun" that's y gun killings in us are amongst the highest despite not being a warzone. How foolish. That's y many us president urged people to get education 😂😂😂

  • @jessicasmith7102
    @jessicasmith7102 4 роки тому

    Good.
    Now, the police force can do a BETTER job at service, and protection for keeping the peace with enforcement of the law. A well armed society is a polite society.

    • @gcb345
      @gcb345 4 роки тому

      So this means you're okay with people who don't look like you, are armed to the teeth and carrying everyday...
      Somehow I'm betting that you beg to differ on that!

    • @redneck96100
      @redneck96100 4 роки тому

      @@gcb345 The US cops are no more armed than they used to be.
      Aside from getting more less lethal options.
      And normal patrol officers don't wear SWAT gear all the time.

  • @kkjoe2677
    @kkjoe2677 4 роки тому

    When big money mixes with politics, the government no longer serves for normal citizens! For anyone who wants to understand a real history example, I would suggest you to learn the China Ming Dynasty’ history especially the period at the end of empire. I give a summary here: at that time, most of the high-level officials in the central government use the support from one of eight businesses families. These big power businesses not only control the politics and empire businesses but also exports the important materials to the enemy of Ming Dynasty which is Jin Dynasty( later called Qing Dynasty and known as the final empire of China). In that time, central government don’t have money and supplies and only can rely these business groups.

  • @traewatkins931
    @traewatkins931 4 роки тому +3

    I always wondered why actual military surplus dried up in the 90s. The 1033 program should be repealed and any equipment given to police should be returned to the fed.

    • @dboygamer8184
      @dboygamer8184 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah and make our police force weak in case of riots and what if the criminals are heavily armored and armed. Look at the 1997 Bank Robbery in North Hollywood. Idiot

  • @sford2044
    @sford2044 4 роки тому

    I don't think this is ok. We need social workers, not armorded police.

    • @sford2044
      @sford2044 4 роки тому

      What I'm saying is that law enforcement agencies need to expand their capabilities. Also, a 12 gauge would greet you.

    • @greenesyt563
      @greenesyt563 11 місяців тому

      When a shooting breaks down you think social workers can do any thing

  • @stefangabrielbucur5816
    @stefangabrielbucur5816 3 роки тому

    I saw that an anarchist was arrested, near the end of the video. If you are a peaceful citizen why you would feel intimidated by the military gear of the cops?

    • @ano3758
      @ano3758 3 роки тому

      If you are a peaceful citizen then you shouldnt fear the gvt spying on you. If you are a peaceful citizen then you should fear gvt putting hits on citizens. If you are a peaceful citizen then you shouldn't fear the gvt siezing your property for any reason. Do you see how that is a downhill slope?

  • @daviddwhit3225
    @daviddwhit3225 4 роки тому +7

    You guys should get a real job

  • @TheM3TAL1
    @TheM3TAL1 4 роки тому +1

    We need to do something effective against this and NOW!!!

  • @TPGGGG__
    @TPGGGG__ 4 роки тому +7

    Basically, taxpayers pay for these kind of equipments just to be hurt or killed by the weapons they paid for the military/ police to have.

    • @SH1xmmY
      @SH1xmmY 4 роки тому

      How ironic though LOL

    • @JohnSkyLey
      @JohnSkyLey 4 роки тому +1

      Maybe don't loot, riot, and cause anarchy. Then you won't have to deal with the police.

  • @geot9017
    @geot9017 4 роки тому +7

    So I’m reading the actual 1033 data and there are some random stuff like Cots, Bikes, first aid kits. But yeah continue with the scare tactics

    • @maxapple019
      @maxapple019 4 роки тому +3

      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_Enforcement_Support_Office
      I don't know about scare tactics, while sure they may be getting miscellaneous stuff they're obtaining "small arms" and as stated "aircraft" and "armored vehicles"

  • @gavincrocker851
    @gavincrocker851 4 роки тому +4

    Swat teams need all that gear

  • @robertsullivan8045
    @robertsullivan8045 4 роки тому

    ...If your area jurisdiction has recently switched to a encrypted communication network for all of the jurisdictions secured communication needs, that would have been sufficient to allow the agency/s to acquire this eqipment for free from the fed Gov.....I live in CO and they did that here and there was no request for a budget increase to get it. ...and CO has been silent on the matter....I have associates who work in law enforcement and what I asked them got their "nod of" you got it right!...this was never publicized in CO ,...yet I knew about it ?...ask one in your local ,..if you can do it safely?...lol...no joke!

  • @JnateM
    @JnateM 3 роки тому

    so America is fighting a war on home ground

  • @EyFmS
    @EyFmS 2 роки тому

    Next thing we know your local police department will have their own nukes. That'll keep everyone safe!!!

    • @pabloaleatorio
      @pabloaleatorio 2 роки тому

      Please do not rob stores, subject to strategic bombing

    • @pepsi_man4962
      @pepsi_man4962 2 роки тому

      are you a liberal?

    • @EyFmS
      @EyFmS 2 роки тому

      @@pepsi_man4962 Depends on what.

    • @pepsi_man4962
      @pepsi_man4962 2 роки тому

      @@EyFmS alright

    • @EyFmS
      @EyFmS 2 роки тому +1

      @@pepsi_man4962 I don't mind drinking Pepsi though, I do not discriminate.

  • @alvisedwald
    @alvisedwald 4 роки тому +3

    I can safely discard this video as a leftist... Very biased.