Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2019
- Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is a comedy-drama film written and directed by #QuentinTarantino. Produced by Columbia Pictures, Bona Film Group, Heyday Films, and Visiona Romantica and distributed by Sony Pictures Releasing, it is an international co-production between the United States and the United Kingdom. The film stars #LeonardoDiCaprio, #BradPitt, #MargotRobbie, Emile Hirsch, Margaret Qualley, Timothy Olyphant, Austin Butler, Dakota Fanning, Bruce Dern, and Al Pacino. They are part of a large ensemble cast who star in "multiple storylines in a modern fairy tale tribute to the final moments of Hollywood's golden age". The film is set in 1969 Los Angeles, where an aging television actor and his stunt double and longtime friend navigate the changing Hollywood film industry.
Visit us at filmcompanion.in
Do Like, Share, Comment & Subscribe to our channel.
Subscribe: bit.ly/FCsubscribe
Follow Us On:
/ filmcompanion
/ filmcompanion
/ filmcompanion
The Film Companion is a web channel intended to promote Indian cinema through films review, interviews, discussions, video essays and analytical compilations. It is intended primarily for the purpose of encouraging informed discussions, criticism and review of cinema and towards such purpose the programs use short extracts of cinematograph films, sounds recording and photographic works. These clips and extracts are of a minimal nature and the use is not intended to interfere in any manner with their commercial exploitation of the compete work by the owners of the copyright. The use of works are in compliance with the fair dealing exception provided under Sec. 52 of the Copyright Act, and we asset our use of the works under the exception provided for criticism and review. - Розваги
This man knows what he’s talking about. It was a beautiful review man. Keep up the good job !
Being a struggling actor in Hollywood, I loved this movie every bit, being American I could relate a lot.
@@shrisub881 Not really bro, I've worked in India too ..it was a lot of fun if your ambition isn't very high.
I too liked the film, when Tarantino Said it will set around Sharon Tate I expected him to tweak history just like inglorious bastards, the way movie went was very good, I truly enjoyed the moment where a child actress tells Leonardo that it was the best acting she has seen, Leonardo’s expression fantastic. Really enjoy that part
when the dog clamps the guy at the "Texas" groin, i realized QT made me wait and wait and wait for all the tension built to blow up. damn!
I hit the like button before watching the video. Thats how you trust BR!!
Ok
i really loved interstellar ,it was engaging throughout .concept like that with engaging screen play ,where Christopher nolan stands
imo interstellar is low tier nolan
Quite unbelievable how basic stuff some people asking these questions cannot understand.
Thank you for reading my question.
I am sorry I was not clear enough in my first question. The Twitter word limit compelled me to frame the question in a very stupid manner.
I loved the film and the ending.
I do not think that Quentin Tarantino is washed up actor or a director. He is a very talented writer and director. What I meant in the first question is that Quentin was looking back at himself as a rockstar director and how his legacy from a video store clerk to a cinema auteur is fading away, as people are no more going to theatres to watch movies and everything is going on streaming.
I just loved the end of the video, last two questions and the way BR explains his thoughts! Worth
Loved ur point on the directing stuff BR.. Very true.. All his previous movies were relied on his brilliant writing skills combined with his direction but this one was completely on his directing skills..!! I loved the climax really because tweaking history and the last scene between leo and margot was so overwhelming..!! ❤️
Baradwaj Rangan... You are just awesome man.
Very well explained...lots of our audience who are habituated to formulaic Marvel and summer blockbuster movies, probably won't understand the movie well
Well not bcoz of that. Movie is enjoyable for those who knows about 60s Hollywood movies, shows and music. Not audience's fault. Though last 40 minutes were amazing.
Lol you sound like one of those pseudo intellectual with a tagline 'Im QT fan and anything other than QT is mediocre to my standard of filmic taste' bs
Loved the episode. My thoughts are similar to yours except the fact that I thoroughly enjoyed the climax 😊
You're making me go for it again, BR. This time I want to absorb the vibe of Hollywood in '69. Loved the ending too.
I didn't know I NEEDED this!
Interstellar delivered what it promised imo. Half of our general Indian audience found out about Nolan through interstellar. It didn't rely on the directors Calibre or image as much as Once upon Hollywood did.And also I wonder what would people say about OutiH if they didn't know Tarantino directed it. I felt this film is okay. Not bad, not great .
Interstellar was repetitive so that you get the story in your first watch. Btw it was a big budget movie and hence was targeted towards a larger audience.
Great analysis of the dog scene. Watched the movie today and loved it
Finally, someone gets the reason for all the driving!
"Charlie's gonna dig you" Mr. B Rangan
Wow, great dissection of the movie!
Amazing insights
Tarrantino played it safe but he wanted to make something done different . Now, I believe we really have to revisit this film after some years and wait for whether the films holds up or not . This dilemma is similar to the coen brother's "a serious man" it was panned by the critics and the public at large when it was released but now, the conscious has changed and it is bracketed under the better films of corn brother's.
You're Great Sir... But I loved the ending too 😅🙃 .
Loved the thought of Rick dalton starring in China town
I love the drama and dailouges
I loved the review and the movie. Thank you sir👍
Please do more reviews of like this where u cover Tarantino and Scorsese films. Keep going.
Regarding the question about filmmakers in india making alternative history movies, I think Hey Ram comes closer to that genre though the climax of the movie doesn't really alter the History. But Kamal has beautiful blended fiction with facts by placing Saketh Ram in the time period between Bengal riots and assasination of MK Gandhi.
RRR is coming
Hey BR, I've been following you for quite sometime now and your reviews are immaculate. Given a chance to write and direct a movie what genre will it be and why? Also, how will you keep the audience indulged?
BR what's with the Ayn Rand books ??
This movie had the real life Mason murders as the backdrop. I absolutely loved how QT mocked and ridiculed the Mason cult members thereby diminishing their fearsome reputation. What better way to smack down evil humans than ridiculing them. The climax was a riot. From DiCaprio taking a swing from blender full of iced margarita while chasing the cult members away to the sardonic interaction between intruders and Brad Pitt. Tex, in real life uttered those lines during the horrific murder of Sharon Tate and friends. I'm the devil, yada yada yada. To which Brad simply said "Nah it was dumber than that, uh Rex? " 😂
Loved how casually QT spat on real life killers. The BGM throughout climax WAS ON POINT. The final intruder killed by DiCaprio using flamethrower is just poetic in many ways.
*Manson
Br can u make a top10 match watch like that... because so many films u mentioned I don't even know...
In the movie, Sharon Tate represents the vigour of new era. In almost every scene, she shone like a diamond, full of life, going to the cinema to gauge audience response to her role, just living life on her terms. She doesn't have to be a chatterbox. Her screen presence is enough to convey her vivacious vibe. Rick Dalton embodies the end of an era. Always smoking, coughing non stop, bitter, depressed with bundles of self pity. Sharon inviting him home is supposed to be the fairy tale ending as opposed to brutal killing of Sharon in real life. Thus the film title, Once Upon A Time.....
It is QT's fairytale love letter to a bygone Hollywood era. Radical feminist can't seem to enjoy anything because they approach art with a rigid checklist. Instead of immersing in the director's storytelling, they are busy judging the movie with the said checklist. I loved Tarantino's response to a journo asking why Sharon talked less and smiled more. He said "I reject your hypothesis"😁
Feminists are the new witch burners and / or the re-incarnation of the crones sitting around the Guillotine in Revolutionary France.
Nasty creatures. And there isn't anything other than 'radical' feminists now. All of the sane ones were exiled.
Sad that i can't watch this episode cos there may be spoilers. And same is the case with most Ask BRs .
The censor cuts in this movie was absurd. I counted more than 32 audio cuts. Even the word "cock" was muted in a "A" rated film.
Also noticed few visual cuts when Leo meets Timothy on the set of Lancer.
See, this is not the first time a movie has been butchered by the CBFC. I've made peace with it. But this is the first I'm actually seeing articles on the web declaring - OUATIH cleared without cuts. That's a blatant lie. [t.co/xqgRLFiBGa]
Hindustan Times actually wrote an article using a critic's tweet, saying 'only ass muted thrice' - t.co/TBEFln9uJR
Again, a lie. Ass, bastard, cock etc muted. Middle finger blurred in a A movie. The movie is out there for everyone to see and fact check that there's actually more than 32 cuts [mute/cut/blur]
What am I missing here? Why is everyone lying? I'm just confused. That's all.
Not many in India will see this movie to catch this lie, but they will remember that Prasoon is better than Pahlaj after reading these articles and tweets and conclude that - 'we're on the right track.'
Again, a lie.
Come on man! I think hateful 8 is his best work
In vadakkan veeragatha movie M T Vasudevan Nair altered the history. Actually Chandu the hero character portrayed by Mammootty was not a good person in history. He altered it.
He didn't alter the history necessarily but gave a different angle.
Compare this with inglorious basterds where the whole history was altered.
'I don't know'
-BR :)
Tarantino films are Tarantino films.
08:00 SS Rajamouli altered history with RRR 👏
I get it that you like direction and flow of it and all. I get it and I feel it too but it was like never ending. Here and there I felt okay but even when he walks, even when he opens doors, it's very very slow it's like slow motion, not even reality. Which is very big drawback. He is loosing us, getting us and it's kind of mixed bag
After seeing ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD a second time last night I’m just wondering if there is a way that somebody can just INJECT THE FUCKING MOVIE INTO MY VEINS PLEASE
People who question on this film doesn't know about cinema. It's QT best film
Why are you not allowed to question tho?
@@imonceagainaskingforyourfi4432 there is nothing to complain
Bullshit .
His best films are
1. Pulp fiction
2. Django unchained
3. Inglorious bastards
4. Reservoir dogs
5.the hateful eight
This films needs some time for people to form educated opinion about it
@@renukuntladinakaran6960 well any film is right to be doubted and criticized. Well just because one does love QT, doesn't mean that he's a pseudo intellectual cinematic Jesus
I'd rate this film 3.6 . Not great , not terrible !
Had it been like they made the film till the sharon Tate character dies in a gruesome manner (as in history)with the tarantinoish making,i would have got the complete cinematic orgasm.But the film goes in a pure happy ending way which is completely unexpected and out of style from a maker like him.It didn't create any goosebumps at any moments.Hope it won't continue in his last venture
Even Inglorious Bastards had a good ending tbh. But the pay off was amazing right? That's how I view this film also.
That film was alternative history concept so they took cinematic liberty in that but this is not like that
Dude, read the damn title. This movie is essentially a fairytale set in Hollywood. Try to understand anything before criticising it.
Dude I never criticized him in my point I just gave my opinion and thoughts of the film
@@balavigneshchockalingam5182 Quite right. I completely disagree with your point here, but it's your opinion. And you just stated it. As we all do. I happen to believe that you would have enjoyed the film more if you had seen it without expecting the usual Tarrantino tropes, but there you go. I do seriously have to wonder why you wanted to see the slaughter of innocents by lunatic cultists, but I guess that's another issue altogether.
imho interstellar is best work of Nolan, just because of the writing and emotional stakes
U are different. Many say Climax is only tarantino touch.many didn't like remaining s.
It's a harpoon gun
The signal to dog is unnecessary. It's a known thing to everyone.😂
Everyone understands it even if the trailer scene is not there . We have many that kind of things which is not necessary and he is just orgasming for his creativity but it's obvious for the viewer, Chalo I get it . Move on types. Between I'm the big QT fan.
Even Inglorious or Django or Hateful right has slow sequences but they are interesting, they tell you or make you feel something new, where as here it is just happening like a docu drama.
I don't know about you but if that trailer scene wasn't there, the scene in the climax wouldn't have worked for me. The last 20 mins of the film were so satisfying and hilarious!
@@chaithanya.gollapalliI agree to that, it's hugely satisfying in the last 20 mins, but come on without him giving the dog signal in their first scene it can really work because it's his pet. I understand they should establish their bonding, but their intro feels like some fucking 10 minutes, which is not needed in my opinion. The scene in the trailer is important, with respect to the establishment of bond between him and dog but it's not something very exciting momentarily. A person signalling his dog to do something doesn't need a history of back story is what I meant. 🤷🏼♂️
I like some very meaningful scenes like leo and child scene, Brad fixing the antenna one,Brad going to ranch, Sharon watching her own movie in theatre,etc there is some kind of storytelling happening in those scenes which is okay even if they are dragged.
@@chaithanya.gollapalli I agree. The trailer scene showed how obedient brandy was
@@vinaykumar7121 If you didn't like those scenes, then I think you don't know QT. All his movies have scenes like that. He always establishes everything very hard even if it's not necessary & it works like a charm. I watched all his movies only once but still, I'll take each & every one of them to my grave. Such is his impact. If you want to talk about redundancy, the complete shooting sequence of Leo & that kid was unnecessary but QT did it just to establish that he's a great actor. Now when he's heading into their home, the director askes him if he'd like to act for his movie & genuinely felt happy and satisfied. The impact would've been less if he did the acting scene in 5 minutes. He took 20 & gave us an iconic scene.
@@chaithanya.gollapalli I think you didn't read my comment properly. I said I liked the Leo and Kids scene , Sharon watching her movie in theatre, Etc.
I very much understand what Tarantino does in the field of detailing and the pay off it delivers. No fucking doubt about it. He always drags that extra bit and make you feel wow. Like some examples like the bar scene in Inglorious or Superman discussion in Kill bill 2 etc. They either have instant pay off or either interesting by creating suspense,comedy or some kind of a connection. Whereas with most of scenes in Hollywood its more like he want us to live there with the characters and feel them, I get it and the pay off is way far that you actually forget some of the details, and also the teaser trailers are a huge curse to the film. They showed something very pacy, exciting,edgy and didn't deliver it. I feel it's an okay film not as great as his previous endeavors. You might love it a lot for some other reasons but I was a little disappointed as it didn't reach my expectations. I was in full kick after the end of the film because of that amazing climax but after a week it left me which was unusual for a Tarantino film. His films are not about the first weekend thing they are much more than that and Hollywood is not that for me.
I liked The Hateful 8 much better. Being a Tarantino fan, I didn't like this movie. May be because I didn't know about the history of Sharon Tate and 60s Hollywood. It had some tense moments but a very lengthy movie
Please interview Chiyaan vikram
Poda punda
12:09 People must know this. Just because nothing is happening on the screen, that doesn’t mean there nothing actually happening. Otherwise they are gonna say The Tree of Life( such a masterpiece) is a dumb movie.
Hey BR, who do you believe was better in the movie. Did Leonardo DiCaprio outshine Brad Pitt?? Or do you believe the opposite?
Sharon Tate is heart of the movie. In real life, Sharon Tate murdered .
Agree with BR regarding the censoring. It just made no sense and it was very silly. Censoring cigarettes and beer cans was annoying to watch!! The script required it, the character was required to do it so what is the damn problem? Also, in the theater where I watched, "asshole" was censored but "fuck" was not. I mean, if thats not a face palm moment, I really don't know what is... either censor everything or censor nothing!!!🤦🙄
Who heard QT as cutie!
No questions on the endless references to Italian westerns and American western? I swear there was 20 mins of just watching the TV footage inside the film.
Also regarding Bruce Lee, it’s apparently a fantasy/flashback of Cliff but it wasn’t shown that it was a flashback till the end of the sequence. Felt almost like a justification for making fun of Bruce Lee than an actual organic thing in the screenplay.
Also Cliff isn’t a saint. He apparently killed his wife, hyper masculine and also is a racist. But the film glorifies him a lot by showing how “better” he is where he takes down the manson cult members and refuses intimacy with an underage girl (clear reference to polanski) no other reason for the scene to be in there. There were many scenes like this, that were just there as meta references, rather than part of the story.
Still overall liked the film (every scene with Rick is just amazing) though tate’s scenes were boring af, but still underwhelming to my expectations.
🤦♂🤦♂
How was Brad Pitt character racist?
FIRST..
The way they portrayed Bruce lee was not "cool".
Disrespectful.
Yeah for Bruce Lee fans
@@prajeeths2131 Maybe tarantino should have played that role portraying himself as the loud mouth
Bank SSC aspirants from up and bihar didn't like this film
What?? I don't understand
0:47 dei sotta yenda nolan mela vanmaththa kakura
Hateful Eight was much more intriguing and had a far better screenplay
I like OUATIH more that H8. But thanks a lot for praising H8. That movie is very underrated and divisive
I liked Reservoir dogs, Jackie Brown, Pulp Fiction, for some extent inglorious bastards! Kill Bill 1 and 2 is like a vijayashanti movie! Lot of logic missing movie! THE BRIDE carries Hattori Hanzo sword in a flight from Okinawa to Mexico! to Kill Bill! Is it possible! Security at airport so lethargic!
Personally I felt Alexander Payne, Martin Scorsese, Roman Polanski better then this Tarantino! Polanskis The Pianist was too good Adrien Brody licking the jam scene have any one felt how he felt when a Nazi soldier gives him a loaf of bread and yummy jam! Movies like Office space! directed by Mike judge it's simple, real IT corporate culture! Peter Gibbons! I was like him! Office I hated like him. Some days I came in between to my house without informing my boss.
First of all sir ,there is no comparison at all between interstellar and this film.
Interstellar is a genre of its own and it was liked by people due to its content and not the director.
For me once upon a time is a decent safe one from Quentin and i would say its a sleeper.
Please interview Chiyaan Vikram
Poda punda
akash deep poda sumba kudhi
@@srinivasbalaram1176 ena rowdy iyera?
This guy lost me when he started arguing for censorship. I'm sick of people like this telling me what I should and shold not be allowed to watch. Who the hell does he think he is? Democracy is about freedom of speech, freedom of creative expression and freedom to believe in what you want to believe in. I don't need this prude dictating to me. Shame on him.
He dint like hateful eight and he doesn't like Chris nolan,
This guy must be a fan of masala movies...hence iam rejecting his hypothesis, because genuine cinema lovers are crazy about hateful eight and once upon a time in Hollywood..
r/moviecirclejerk?