ROUGHLY 30 PICTURES AROUND THESE LINK, CLICK AROUND THESE: www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/32818039980/in/dateposted/ www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/33043849022/in/dateposted/ www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/33158766406/in/photostream/
Thanks for the review. I'm recovering from having most of my gear (canon) stolen...and was considering waiting for this to come out, but scored a deal to replace my Canon 70-200 II in pristine condition for $1300..... Reckon I'm set.... but also just got a camera to use everything on, and the new 150-600 G2. My Canon extenders weren't stolen. So, now I need to get busy seeing how the Tammy works with my two extenders. I hope it will be OK..... if not, I could probably sell my 70-200 for at least 1500 and the extenders, get the tammy 70-200 and both extenders...... doesn't make sense, tho, as the canon 70-200 is simply awesome..... excuse my personal story, but appreciate any comments from you or anyone here.
This is why I love your channel. This is a photographers photography channel. Damn near every other channel is just a bunch of fros, and fedoras, click bait, gear sniffers, dumbed down elementary school garbage, half ass reviews sprinkled with TV quality production, either that or their bad failed used car salesman trying to get you to buy garbage. Keep up the good work.
Thank you, thank you, thank you, Ken! My 70-200 G2 just arrived. I've literally only shot with it for about 10 minutes on my Nikon D610 (yes I know you don't recommend it, but it's what I have), and HOLY SMOKES! This lens is amazing! Sharp as a tack, the focus is fast, and the VR is incredible!
@@richardsoutdoorworld5284 Hey I'm looking for a 70-200mm and I'm trying to decide between the Tamron and the Nikon. What's your opinion given that you have been using it.
I ordered this lens a few days ago... and I am impatiently waiting as we speak... it's refreshing to hear your glowing review knowing that you don't pull punches when it comes to your opinion and have no problem calling a turd a turd... your brutality is greatly appreciated lol
since i paid out of pocket for it (and taxes too), …i was KINDA hoping it stunk……..no chance of that now, its unfreakingbelievable …… last night live stream people thought i was LYING about this lens when i said it was the epic ta-tas
I was shocked about how this lens performed.. at 85mm wide open its sharper than the nikkor 85mm 1.8 at 2.8 and that lens is already sharp as hell.. The VC is crazy.. complete sharp images at 1/60 of a second at 200mm
I walked into my local camera store on day one, before B&H and Adorama were even shipping, and they had it. Now, I already have a VR2. I don't need a 70-200. But I tried it, was freaking amazed, and bought it on the spot. This is the 70-200 to get
Thanks for the review. Bought the 18-400 and so far like it. Went to a Tamron road show in Orlando last night. Lady presenter was very good. Other than the 18-400 I’ve never owned a Tamron. I’m now very interested th the 2.8 70-200 Tammy. Keep up the good work.
We need a field comparison: suggest baseball, track runners or similar coming at the camera...whcih one tracks better? I have read that the Nikkor VRIII is exceptional at this. How does the Tammy perform in the various D500 focus modes?
HaHa! See my post at the top. Many years ago, I had the Tammy Adaptal 300 f/2.8. Used it on my T90 (The first shaped body Canon)Great lens. I still have an old 80-200 2/8 Adaptall. I'd get an EOS adapter for it, but it developed fungus inside.... had it cleaned, but it came back...maybe I should take a chance and take it apart and try to clean it.
Thanks for the reccomendation. You have not steered me wrong yet. On your reccomendation I bought the Tamron 100mm f2.8 and the Nikon 200-500mm combined with the Nikon 500 for wildlife. In both cases I cannot express the extreme happiness I have been with your reccomendations. So once again I am going with your advice and will be buying the Tamron 70-200 G2 as quick as I can. I know I will be anle to use it for many things but I am really looking foreward to teaming it up with both my D500 and D600 to see which will be better for me when photographing the tennis tournaments i am so fond of. Thanks Mr Angry Your friend Doc
Hi Ken, I mostly shoot portraits with the Tamron G1 and today I went down to my local camera shop to test out the new Tamron G2 and shot both the G1 and the G2 for comparison for headshots and to see the sharpness and the background blur-I didn't see any difference..i'll keep my Tamron G1 until it breaks then i'll buy the G2 Thanks away buddy.
Theoria Apophasis You right and you know I have The highest respect for you, and I didn't test it to that point ☝️ but I wish they was a way to show you a few images i did with G1 and tell me if the G2 can do a much better job buddy.. What the best way to sen you a few pictures?
Jean-Michel very interesting! Too bad you can't put them up on Google Drive, Flickr or some other place you could share. I would like to see that as I'm really on the fence on getting the old VC version vs going all out with this new one. IF you didn't have any would you buy the old and save some $$$ or splurge for the G2?
Dan Hi Dan, Just so everyone understand I in no mean undermined Ken exquisite expertise. Depending on what you shooting,if your shooting sport yes go with the G2 it's more up to date plus it has more futures "like focus tracking" for a few hundred bucks- if you shooting studio portrait the G1 is sufficient -Now if you really want to save money and get stella Image quality performance go for the Nikon Nikkor 80-200 f2.8D ED that Ken recommended...you can't go wrong with any of them..Trust me Ken is the king of glass quality...
I just bought the g2. WOW......WOW......WOW, and I got it cheaaaap from Ireland on Ebay. New for 890 Euros. The lens is used with D750. My last shooting was in fairly low light conditions. Iso around 2000, 250 of sec 2.8f. I did not have to do almost any editing. Leaving aside that by Iso 2000 one will see grains by zooming in, the colooooooooooors are just amazing. Next purchase will be the 24-70 g2.
Bought this lens Thursday shoot a wedding today. this lens is amazing. But you are so right about the switches I had it on a Black Rapid strap and I constantly had to turn the stabilizer back on. Definitely will put some gaffer tape on it next time. That is worth every penny would not surprise me if they raise the price a couple hundred dollars soon.
Any chance of reviewing the New Sigma 70-200 F2.8 Sport. I know you are not a big fan of Sigma, but as an expert in lenses it will be nice to voice your opinion and let others know where does the New Sigma sits amongst the Tamron and the Nikon 70-200 F2.8. much appreciates!
Only concern is how the focus accuracy and consistency since it is a third party lens? Haven't used gen 1 but looking to invest in gen 2 since the review is so glowing... price doesn't hurt either :)
Thanks Ken. I got this lens from B&H on Sunday based on your review to pair with my Canon 80D. I love the results am getting. Hope you will have a video on how to calibrate for tac-sharp focus. Thanks you and keep up the great work.
Awesome job you do! Thank you for the video. but I have a quick Q! Have you tested the G2 on the D750 and does it have the same results as the D500. I'm curious about the ISO difference on both of these Nikons. Thank you in advance for your time and answer.
Great review - on my monitor I can see the differences in the pics you posted.....I think the Nikon is more pleasing to my eye generally speaking but damn it's close and not worth close to the difference in price. I shoot events every week and go between my 24-70 and 70-200 depending on the venue etc. I never stand closer than 6 feet away with the 70-200. So, focus breathing isn't relevant in my case. What would sway my decision in favor of the Tamron, low light/indoors with no flash or external lighting. To me that's a huge deal. The only minor thing I'm wondering about is any difference on let's say the d810 or a full frame.
hey buddy... you got one tiny thing wrong... the VC Mode 3 isnt for saving on battery. If you use Mode 1, and you locked your focus, the VC is already compensating your movement. lets imagine that you drifted to the left while focusing... the VC already compensated this movement. if you release the shutter, and drift to left again, the optics may not be able to move even more to compensate or maybe reset trying to compensate fron scratch. For that reason Tamron implemented this... They want to be able to deliver maximum stabilization when taking the picture. They added it to the new version of the 150-600 aswell and it beats the crap out everything else.
Could you make a video explaining why some people think focus breathing is such a big issue? I know for some video applications it is a problem when you want to shift focus from very close to wide or vice versa, but why do some photographers rant about it, especially the old Nikkor 70-200 and this new tamron? Mr TN would have me believe that this lens and the old Nikkor for that matter is completely useless for any kind of portrait shooting
people like that are BUTTON SNIFFERS…….they bitch and moan about every little damn thing for no reason. …….video work its an issue, …..i was repairing lenses 20 years before he ever picked up a camera :/ ….. the Tamron focus breaths UP CLOSE….however only few years ago you couldnt even BUY (it didnt exist) a 70 200 that would focus that damn close……all the talking heads on the www complaining about focus breathing at 6 feet or less is invalid……while you CAN use the lens (NOW) really damn close….im not worried about focus breathing at 6 feet or less on a telephoto meant to be used basically at 10+ feet 99.9999% of the time he has, pure fact, never touched this lens, ive been testing the piss out of it…… :/ heheh
This is a wonderful review! Thanks so much. You know the one set of photogs who would use a 70-200mm close to the minimal focusing distance where focus breathing might matter, is headshot photogs. That's what I do. Now I'm not even sure if I'm thinking rightly of it, so that's why I ask.. I have the first VR Nikon 70-200 and it's focus breathing is minimal. I think like 190 effectively but I'm not certain. So my question is this: Does focus breathing effect the quality of the bokeh? Is it strictly a field of view issue? Or if I want softer nose and ears and tack sharp eyes, is it even an issue that I can't get a true 200mm from something like the Tamron closer to the minimal focusing distance. Thanks again for all you do for the community of photogs at large. [BTW my go to lens for headshots now is the 135mm f/2 Nikkor, I'm noticing more moire with it, does that make any sense?]
I have the G2 in order since last monday. I'm glad I did not buy the Nikon VR III fluorite at 3179 € Tested the Tamron G1 around xmas but it was not sharper than my old Nikon 70-210, so decided so save for the VR III and return the G1. Bokeh and saturation with the G1 was very nice. With the G2, there's no more reason to buy the VR III. Looking at your skateboard shots, the lens delivers. G2 sharpness is crazy, which could not be said of the G1.
Great info, thanks! Any idea how it compares to the Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM? Specifically for shooting soccer in the evening under the lights?
I just bought this lens and love it!!! I shot a wedding on Sunday and WOW. My Fuji is still great for colour balance in mixed light conditions but the 70-200 will be attached at hip. Mine says made in Japan not China.
You forgot to mention that there is a Tamron docking for the focus adjustement and firmware updates.....something what Nikon, Canon and Fony lens has to go to service center.
Theoria Apophasis Yeah, otherwise has to go to "service center", last episode with Olympus did not went well for me, send lens due to motor clicking during video, got it back after 5 days, they cleaned something and the1y made scratch on the colar ring at the front element...and guess what damn thing clicked again.Luckly my mate (owner of the camera shop and dealer ) arranged brand new replacement. So the conclusion: It does not metter which company has own service and repaire own lenses and camera, if there is terible technician there hi will be able to screw up a stone if you give him to repair.
jj p Hmmmm I did not mentioned Sigma here...they suppose to have also docking , since I'm not using any of them including Sony E-mount I would not know how 85 f1.8 G masta...is doing.Had combo a7r II with 90mm macro while ago to try out, nothing wrong for macro, for my taste a bit on short side for insects and small creatures.
If you ever get the chance, I would like to hear your thoughts (review) on the Tamron 150-600mm g2. Basically the same price as the Nikon 200-500mm, but the extra reach for bird photography might make the difference. If the new Tamron 70-200mm kicks ass so might the new Tamron 150-600?
the nikkor 200 500 is king of the hill there,…ive used the tamron, and i agree with most, its not neaerly as good as the nikkor 200 500…… no, the VR on the 200 500 nikkor blasts everything down the pooper. not to mention better image rendering
For someone never owning any of the Tamron 70-200mm (or any 70-200mm) what would one recommend? Do I purchase the latest or buy the previous version used for cheaper? I' am not a professional photographer simply an enthusiast and mainly shoot family and wildlife. Would appreciate some advice from anyone. Great review! Thanks!
I really like this lens, it arrived yesterday and I'm simply blown away by its resolution, VC and sharpness. It's quite and fast. Closeup shots such as head shots fantastic Thanks for the recommendation. Now what's that end switch for panning.
Excellent job Ken. I'd made a mental decision to only buy Nikkor lenses but Tamron are really killing it with pretty much every lens they release. My next lens purchase has to be a 24 - 70, I'll have to wait until Tamron release their G2 of this zoom before I consider buying, especially as the Nikkor 24 - 70 VR is horrendously expensive. Kudos to you on your fair and exhaustive testing 😃
…..its obvious tamron wants to wipe dirty baby diapers in everyones face with this lens……..insane stooopid cheap, and on 90% of things, its better than the $2800 nikkor
Theoria Apophasis They are also giving the finger to Sigma too. If money was no object I'd still opt for the Nikkor but by this showing Tamron are doing everything right yet still making the lenses affordable ☺
I know you just spent even more money on the new G2 Tamron, but would you be willing to also test the new Tamron 10-24 f3.5-4.5? I rented the Nikon 12-24 f4 and I didn't like the bad lens flare that I got with it. I shoot against the sun a lot with super wide angles.
thank you so much. Bought the Tokina 100 mm 2.8 macro based off of your recommendation. Going to buy the Tokina 11-20 mm 2.8 next month. I was keen on this review from you and probably get this by Jun/Jul.
I just bought mine and its just arrived last few days ago. Oh, I'm gutted. It cant track running dogs especially when oncoming even if they are just jogging. I take action shots of dogs, thats basically all I use the camera for. With the Tamron I maybe get 1 hit per 10-20 missed. It was meant to be an upgrade to the nikkor 70-200 f4 that has done me well for years but nothing is better except it opens to 2.8. I'm using a d4, single or 9 focus points and continuous focus. I've made a gamble and just bought the tap in console to see if a firmware update will improve things.
@@freddiefernandez522 I traded it in for a nikon 70-200 2.8 which can track action better, but not any better than the 70-200 f4, but very good. Tamron is a great lens though but not a sport lens imo.
@freddie fernandez oh yeah, perfect for that. I take action photos of dogs and dogs move faster than people, the lens couldnt keep up with tracking that, but for weddings and events I think it will perform brilliantly, its a fab lens. In low light it performs better than any lens Ive used, it can see and snap to objects I cant see with my own eyes. For you, I'd get it, and you'll have no regrets unless you want to track very fast moving subjects. It's not a slow focusing lens, it is fast but not fast-action fast
Thanks Theoria I can't wait to sell my old Tarmon also and I almost purchased the Nikon and then the Tamron came on the scene, it's not March and I am ready. The review was great and very timely, I was excited that you had the actual lens to test against the Nikon and all the lesser issues can be corrected in post with no problem. Keep up your great work.
Ken, I gladly donated a little while ago 5 dollars to you. I believe you deserve to get this lens for free for all of the valuable work that you are doing for us. You earned it over and over. I encourage all of your followers to donate and make sure that you get this lens for free from all of us, plus even get some extra cash for your work. Knowledge is valuable and it should be remunerated Keep up the good work. :)
wassssabi man!!! well i dunno if i deserve that…ill have to sell something to offset the cost, but this lens is amazing……i was kinda hoping it SUCKED, that way i could justify returning it,……no chance of that however.. :) been out testing it today too ….of course all testing is really over, i pounded it 9 ways to sunday to verify what it is :)
Hey buddy, you did a great job, and YES, you deserve it. Is the law of universal energy, I CANNOT BE A ONE STREET only. you give us, and we, as a group should give back to you !! I am saving to get it myself. LOL!!!
whuuut? the nikkor VRIII is $2800 here…… and your Tamron (well thats canadian) …hmm whats that in USD i think youre talking about the VRII, the VRIII just came out and is VERY expensive .$2800 USD
still $2800 here www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=1292140&gclid=CPz7sYXUuNICFcy2wAod6JwFoA&is=REG&ap=y&m=Y&c3api=1876%2C92051678642%2C&A=details&Q=
Love your channel. Keep up the good work. Partly based on your previous review of the previous Tamron 70-200 2.8, I have been saving up for it for my Canon 70D. At the beginning of this review you said there is no comparison between the two and that the previous model is now obsolete compared to this one. Can you perhaps compare them both or talk about why the newer model is so much better? I'm also wondering if I should still go ahead and buy the previous model if it comes down in price as it is still a great lens according to the internet (and yourself). Thank you and kind regards.
relative to the 1st gen tamron , which i also have (and about to sell) …, its night and day diff, especially the VR……when i found out how insane the new tamron was, i switched the testing then only comparing it to the new Nikkor 70 200 2.8 VRIII ($2800). …… the Tamron focus breaths UP CLOSE….however only few years ago you couldnt even BUY (it didnt exist) a 70 200 that would focus that damn close……all the talking heads on the www complaining about focus breathing at 6 feet or less is invalid……while you CAN use the lens (NOW) really damn close….im not worried about focus breathing at 6 feet or less on a telephoto meant to be used basically at 10+ feet 99.9999% of the time
Hey, thanks for the reply. I agree with you on the focus breathing being obsolete. People's gripe may stem from the fact that the 1st gen model was a macro lens, whereas the 2nd and 3rd gen are not. What I'm confused about, though, is when you refer to the 1st gen Tamron, and the previous model. From what I understand there have been two previous models, one with VR (or VC) and one without. When you say they are worlds apart, are you referring to the previous model being Di VC USD? That is the one with Vibration Control, which according to my research was worlds apart from its predecessor, the Di LD (IF) which was also a macro lens but didn't have the VR/VC. The Di VC USD was supposed to have amazing VR, the only problem was the AF wasn't up to par with the Nikon or Canon models. If you're saying the VR in the new G2 is worlds apart from the Di VC USD, I'm finding it difficult to understand how it could have improved over the previous model which was supposed to be excellent in every way already. I'm guessing the AF has improved significantly too? I wouldn't have this much interest in writing such a long winded response only I was very interested in the Di VC USD which is practically half the price of the Canon/Nikor. The fact that I could purchase the 24-70 AND 70-200 for the same price as the Canon/Nikon lens makes it a no brainer for me. So I guess compared to the 2nd gen Di VC USD, is there much difference?
Why is Tony & Chel saying they will not even review the lens because it focus breathes "way too much"?!?!?! Thats just stupid! Thanks for your insight.. Do you think the focus breathing is that significant in this lens?
Was there more than one generation of this lens, I notice on EBay some sellers mention G2, some others do not say G2 in their description. Thank you, P.S. I miss visiting family in Pike County KY.
Thanks for the fast review. How is the 3d pop and micro contrast of this lens? Is it true that this 23 element lens can compete with my Nikkor 2.8 135 prime lens at 135mm? How is the flaring and vignetting? Should I sell my 150$ prime and buy the zoom?
Looking forward to you reviewing the upcoming Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport lens and comparing it to this one. As always, great job on this review Ken. Thank you.
My bad Ken... I wasn't aware that you weren't a Sigma fan. I was going to hold off on buying the Tamron lens since the Sigma was near the same price point.
I bought it in June and I love it. At 1379€ it wasn't exactly a bargain for me but it is true that compared to other lenses this is an amazing value. At the moment I have two lenses for my animal photography in my bag. This 70-200/2.8 and the Sigma 100-400 f/whatever. These two lenses work so well together for me, they do everything I need. The only issue I have with them is... That they both got cheaper a few weeks after I bought them XD But hey I am happy with them so it's fine.
Thank you for the complete and thorough review. Since I don't have $1,300 to upgrade to G2, would you be able to tell me how close the G1 is to the G2. Is it 80-90% or not even that close? Thank you again
Hi Ken, I'm a bit confused about your comparison of the Tamron G2 compared to the Tamron G1 although that was the purpose to make a comparison between the two-How ever you have given a absolute in-depth in the pass of the Tamron G1 against the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 and yes i've purchase the Tamron G1 and save lots of money and was able to shot both indoors studio and outdoor.. But now for to sell my Tamron G1 and get the Tamron G2 I need more then just no comparison to Nikon 70-200 and Tamron G1..Please give us detail from glass color rendition and contrast etc....
Ken, how this lens compares to the tamron 70-200mm 2.8 vc usd? is this a new version (G2?) I'm confused. Is the 2.8 VC USD any good? On another note, any thoughts about the 24-70 2.8 vc tamron?
Food for thought ! I use my lenses for 20%Landscape / 40%portrait / 40% Bird photography. Do i actually go for 70-200 G2 + 1.7/2.0 converter or Nikkor 200-500. I own 70-300 nikkor AF-P VR right now...
This is an old video but since I am a hair away from pushing the buy button on the tamron lens. In your flickr comparison fotos I mostly see the d500 as tested camera . Did you test on FX? All lenses are better in the center so Clearly a cropped image may look better. I maybe would be willing to buy the insanely expensive nikon FL but not it it isn't at least "30% better".
Thank you my Lens MAN, you done it again, no BS... Tamron should get ready for the high demand base on a REAL review, and they should be calling soon. Dont worry about the $$$ you spend on it. We will take care of you!!!!! Love you man!!
Had my 70-200 G2 for about 5 days off your recommendation...and I must say: its FUCKING incredible...I shot night pool side portraits on my D850 at 1/40 of a second (with a strobe duh.... I’m not crazy) and the photos are SHARPER than a porcupines pubic hairs This lense’s VC practically bypasses that high MP camera shake notion that all these UA-cam photographers “preach” about... My copy worked right out the box, no tap console thingy needed Thanks again Sir Ken
Hi many thanks for review. I think will be very interesting to see a short movie with AF speed of both latest lens (nikon and tamron 70-200) Will be interesting to see how the AF performs in good light and low light but without strong contrast. And see whitch is the best. For this tipe of lens AF speed and accuracy is very important. All the best!
I have the previous version of the Tamron 70-200. It's an amazing lens. Is the new G2 version that much better than the previous? Will it be worth the upgrade? Also, my version was made in Japan : )
ive been beating the hell out of this lens…..its Fing EPIC since i paid out of pocket for it (and taxes too), …i was KINDA hoping it stunk……..no chance of that now, its unfreakingbelievable …… last night live stream people thought i was LYING about this lens when i said it was the epic ta-tas
no its not….3 years + ago you couldnt even get a 70 200 to focus at 4 feet or less, so it doesnt matter……anyone hot to use a 70 200 at 4 or 5 feet has a screw loose. :) hehehehe this lens is awesome
I don't doubt you that the lens is awesome Ken, but focus breathing is an issue when focus stacking. I had exactly that problem yesterday and it was not something I had even considered before. I was trying to compress the perspective with the long lens (@200MM) on a beach scene with a distant lighthouse, sand dunes and a river estuary in the mid ground and a load of driftwood in the foreground. The driftwood changed size as I changed the focus distance. I don’t know if there is anything can be done about that. Any suggestions?
I have been shooting with this lens with the d500 and I've notice when I use group area AF, sometimes my focus seems to be slighty off. Does this lens need calibration or adjustments?
Going to start saving up for this one. I'm a Canon user, so I'll be interested to see how it stacks up against the 70-200 II in terms of focus breathing. What I am more interested in is, does it have a lower magnification (at the same distance) than the other 70-200s (beyond 14 feet) due to the effects of focus breathing. I'm looking at this lens for weddings and events, where the larger magnification of the Canon is still attractive.
im sure to assume the canon is equally as epic….. :) i was comaring this against the VRIII $2800 new lens. beyond 14 feet, no, negligible …nothing… the bad focus breathing is 6 feet and less……but thats NO issue.. the Tamron focus breaths UP CLOSE….however only few years ago you couldnt even BUY (it didnt exist) a 70 200 that would focus that damn close……all the talking heads on the www complaining about focus breathing at 6 feet or less is invalid……while you CAN use the lens (NOW) really damn close….im not worried about focus breathing at 6 feet or less on a telephoto meant to be used basically at 10+ feet 99.9999% of the time
Theoria Apophasis Thanks so much for the reply. it makes so much sense, now that you have made sense of the whole focus breathing brouhaha. I'm looking to use it for shooting from a distance, and as long as it gives me the same magnification as any other 70-200, I know I'm good.
Hi Ken, Ordered the Tamron 70-200 g2 after watching your videos. Coming from the Nikon 2.8 vrii I can tell it’s an awesome lens. The copy I got is soft at 2.8 70mm. I’m wondering if I should send it back for an exchange?... or is it being soft something that can be fixed with the tap console? Appreciate all of your videos. Cheers!
I will get some shooting done this weekend, I just need a subject now. One thing that I don't recall in your review, is the 6 year warranty that comes with the US version, that shows that a company really stands behind their product.
You raved so much about the Nikkor 70-200e and now say the tamron is that much better? I bought the new Nikon 70-200e. Should I sell it off and get the tamron instead? Or keep it?
i never said that much better....... its $1500 cheaper, a HAIR sharper.....the rendering is a bit less saturated, its heavier, the zoom ring is NOWHERE near as smooth...... its a STEAL at $1300.....keep teh nikkor.
I need something that focuses better for fast moving sports shots. I want a good bang for the buck. Right now using a 50 1.8G and 105 1.4E which I love but don't perform well for fast moving. Do you guys think this is a good choice? would it focus better and faster for sports than my 50 1.8G?
Hi Ken. Thanks for your support. I have one question. Is that Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2 SO good ... that I can pass Nikkor 180 2.8 and shoot similar images with this Tamron? Please help because I consider one of the two lenses. Thank you.
I just purchased the new Tamron 70-200mm G2 today and I've been comparing it to my Nikon 70-200mm VR2. My VR2 is definitely slightly sharper than the G2. I'm wondering if I need to do some AF micro-adjustments or perhaps I didn't get a great copy.
www.flickr.com/photos/129412475@N03/33224724441/in/datetaken-public/ www.flickr.com/photos/129412475@N03/33224726811/in/datetaken-public/ Here are two shots that pretty much summarize what I've been getting for the most part. Yes, both shots taken on a tripod with a 2 sec shutter delay and exact same settings.
noooo, the last 70 200 2.8 was (during its later production) was also made in china…… the eARLY ones were japan made. this lens is now #1 BEST VALUE…period, …
Hey Ken, did you try this lens on your D7100? It was out of focus on all 3 of my D7100, even at f4. Had to tune it to +16 and even that wasn't really good. maybe it got a bad copy.
would love that, i have the current 24-70, not as well built and robust as the Nikkor, but gets the job done! Judging from the step up they made with the 15-30 and now the new Gen2 70-200, things are looking great, not to mention the new design (getting rid of the gold) looks so much better! My best buy ever is that 15-30. Many thanks to mr AP for that, one year shooting and zero issues with it. On and upwards tamron!
ROUGHLY 30 PICTURES AROUND THESE LINK, CLICK AROUND THESE:
www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/32818039980/in/dateposted/
www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/33043849022/in/dateposted/
www.flickr.com/photos/134746128@N05/33158766406/in/photostream/
FLICK PAGE FOR NEW TAMRON LENS WITH PICS I TOOK WITH IT:
www.flickr.com/groups/3416468@N22/pool/with/32818039980/
In 2020 I've just bough this for my Z6 with f>z converter. Really lovely and well built. Cheers for the great video.
Would you still recommend this for your z6?
Thanks for the review. I'm recovering from having most of my gear (canon) stolen...and was considering waiting for this to come out, but scored a deal to replace my Canon 70-200 II in pristine condition for $1300..... Reckon I'm set.... but also just got a camera to use everything on, and the new 150-600 G2. My Canon extenders weren't stolen. So, now I need to get busy seeing how the Tammy works with my two extenders. I hope it will be OK..... if not, I could probably sell my 70-200 for at least 1500 and the extenders, get the tammy 70-200 and both extenders...... doesn't make sense, tho, as the canon 70-200 is simply awesome..... excuse my personal story, but appreciate any comments from you or anyone here.
As soon as I get out of being broke I will buy this lens and get broke again!
Yeah! broke here we both come!
Miguel Rebelo i
story of my life
#goalfriends 😂
I just rebroked thanks to this lens. I'm right there with ya!
This is why I love your channel. This is a photographers photography channel. Damn near every other channel is just a bunch of fros, and fedoras, click bait, gear sniffers, dumbed down elementary school garbage, half ass reviews sprinkled with TV quality production, either that or their bad failed used car salesman trying to get you to buy garbage.
Keep up the good work.
sniffing and clickin' :P thanks Ted
1000%
Thank you, thank you, thank you, Ken! My 70-200 G2 just arrived. I've literally only shot with it for about 10 minutes on my Nikon D610 (yes I know you don't recommend it, but it's what I have), and HOLY SMOKES! This lens is amazing! Sharp as a tack, the focus is fast, and the VR is incredible!
Hey , I have a Nikon D610 , im looking to get this lens , how you feel about this lens with the D610 after 2 years ? Thanks
@@richardsoutdoorworld5284 Hey I'm looking for a 70-200mm and I'm trying to decide between the Tamron and the Nikon. What's your opinion given that you have been using it.
I ordered this lens a few days ago... and I am impatiently waiting as we speak... it's refreshing to hear your glowing review knowing that you don't pull punches when it comes to your opinion and have no problem calling a turd a turd... your brutality is greatly appreciated lol
since i paid out of pocket for it (and taxes too), …i was KINDA hoping it stunk……..no chance of that now, its unfreakingbelievable …… last night live stream people thought i was LYING about this lens when i said it was the epic ta-tas
Using God's name in vain is not funny...
I stayed up waiting! Amazing lens and review! I sent you 10 bucks. Thanks for reviewing this for all of us!
you sir, are a Sir, ……thank you and huge James !!!!! 😘😘😍😍😍😍😍
I donated too. I stated that we should make sure that Ken gets this lens for free. I a very small effort if the followers get to it !!
all i can do for now is to white list AP's channel from adblock XD
I was shocked about how this lens performed.. at 85mm wide open its sharper than the nikkor 85mm 1.8 at 2.8 and that lens is already sharp as hell..
The VC is crazy.. complete sharp images at 1/60 of a second at 200mm
I've just made the jump to full frame and this lens was my second purchase due to this video thank you
I walked into my local camera store on day one, before B&H and Adorama were even shipping, and they had it. Now, I already have a VR2. I don't need a 70-200. But I tried it, was freaking amazed, and bought it on the spot. This is the 70-200 to get
damn right :P yeahhhh
The new Tamron blows the Nikon 70-200mm VRII out the water? If this is the case I need to sell my my VRII or 80-200mm.
I just got this lens an hour ago... and thank you for putting to rest any "buyers remorse" feelings that may have crept into my mind.....
How is it after 2 years? Just ordered mine haha
Thanks for the review. Bought the 18-400 and so far like it. Went to a Tamron road show in Orlando last night. Lady presenter was very good. Other than the 18-400 I’ve never owned a Tamron. I’m now very interested th the 2.8 70-200 Tammy. Keep up the good work.
We need a field comparison: suggest baseball, track runners or similar coming at the camera...whcih one tracks better? I have read that the Nikkor VRIII is exceptional at this. How does the Tammy perform in the various D500 focus modes?
I've been impatiently waiting for your review, and it's finally here!
two words on this new lens "Epic tits" :O :P
HaHa! See my post at the top. Many years ago, I had the Tammy Adaptal 300 f/2.8. Used it on my T90 (The first shaped body Canon)Great lens. I still have an old 80-200 2/8 Adaptall. I'd get an EOS adapter for it, but it developed fungus inside.... had it cleaned, but it came back...maybe I should take a chance and take it apart and try to clean it.
Purchased it this Sunday! It kicks ass on my Nikon d850
Going all in “G2 TRINITY” based on your reviews 👍
With Canon Eos R
Thanks for the reccomendation. You have not steered me wrong yet. On your reccomendation I bought the Tamron 100mm f2.8 and the Nikon 200-500mm combined with the Nikon 500 for wildlife. In both cases I cannot express the extreme happiness I have been with your reccomendations. So once again I am going with your advice and will be buying the Tamron 70-200 G2 as quick as I can. I know I will be anle to use it for many things but I am really looking foreward to teaming it up with both my D500 and D600 to see which will be better for me when photographing the tennis tournaments i am so fond of.
Thanks Mr Angry
Your friend Doc
Hi Ken, I mostly shoot portraits with the Tamron G1 and today I went down to my local camera shop to test out the new Tamron G2
and shot both the G1 and the G2 for comparison for headshots and to see the sharpness and the background blur-I didn't see any difference..i'll keep my Tamron G1 until it breaks then i'll buy the G2
Thanks away buddy.
too bad you didnt check the AF tracking ROFL ROFL……and other things
Theoria Apophasis You right and you know I have The highest respect for you, and I didn't test it to that point ☝️ but I wish they was a way to show you a few images i did with G1 and tell me if the G2 can do a much better job buddy..
What the best way to sen you a few pictures?
Jean-Michel very interesting! Too bad you can't put them up on Google Drive, Flickr or some other place you could share. I would like to see that as I'm really on the fence on getting the old VC version vs going all out with this new one. IF you didn't have any would you buy the old and save some $$$ or splurge for the G2?
Dan Hi Dan, Just so everyone understand I in no mean undermined Ken exquisite expertise. Depending on what you shooting,if your shooting sport yes go with the G2 it's more up to date plus it has more futures "like focus tracking" for a few hundred bucks- if you shooting studio portrait the G1 is sufficient -Now if you really want to save money and get stella Image quality performance go for the Nikon Nikkor 80-200 f2.8D ED that Ken recommended...you can't go wrong with any of them..Trust me Ken is the king of glass quality...
I just bought the g2. WOW......WOW......WOW, and I got it cheaaaap from Ireland on Ebay. New for 890 Euros. The lens is used with D750. My last shooting was in fairly low light conditions. Iso around 2000, 250 of sec 2.8f. I did not have to do almost any editing. Leaving aside that by Iso 2000 one will see grains by zooming in, the colooooooooooors are just amazing. Next purchase will be the 24-70 g2.
Bought this lens Thursday shoot a wedding today. this lens is amazing. But you are so right about the switches I had it on a Black Rapid strap and I constantly had to turn the stabilizer back on. Definitely will put some gaffer tape on it next time. That is worth every penny would not surprise me if they raise the price a couple hundred dollars soon.
THANKS a lot for your helpful reviews .
i like your TRUTH talks .
Any chance of reviewing the New Sigma 70-200 F2.8 Sport. I know you are not a big fan of Sigma, but as an expert in lenses it will be nice to voice your opinion and let others know where does the New Sigma sits amongst the Tamron and the Nikon 70-200 F2.8. much appreciates!
Only concern is how the focus accuracy and consistency since it is a third party lens? Haven't used gen 1 but looking to invest in gen 2 since the review is so glowing... price doesn't hurt either :)
ive been testing consistency back and forth all day on 3 diff bodies
Thanks Ken. I got this lens from B&H on Sunday based on your review to pair with my Canon 80D. I love the results am getting. Hope you will have a video on how to calibrate for tac-sharp focus. Thanks you and keep up the great work.
which specific lens? :)
Theoria Apophasis Tamron 70-200 G2
Awesome job you do! Thank you for the video. but I have a quick Q! Have you tested the G2 on the D750 and
does it have the same results as the D500. I'm curious about the ISO difference on both of these Nikons. Thank you in advance for your time and answer.
I waited up for this and you kept you word. Thanks!
and it gave me a migrane headache in the process :/ :)
Great review - on my monitor I can see the differences in the pics you posted.....I think the Nikon is more pleasing to my eye generally speaking but damn it's close and not worth close to the difference in price. I shoot events every week and go between my 24-70 and 70-200 depending on the venue etc. I never stand closer than 6 feet away with the 70-200. So, focus breathing isn't relevant in my case. What would sway my decision in favor of the Tamron, low light/indoors with no flash or external lighting. To me that's a huge deal. The only minor thing I'm wondering about is any difference on let's say the d810 or a full frame.
hey buddy... you got one tiny thing wrong... the VC Mode 3 isnt for saving on battery. If you use Mode 1, and you locked your focus, the VC is already compensating your movement. lets imagine that you drifted to the left while focusing... the VC already compensated this movement. if you release the shutter, and drift to left again, the optics may not be able to move even more to compensate or maybe reset trying to compensate fron scratch. For that reason Tamron implemented this... They want to be able to deliver maximum stabilization when taking the picture. They added it to the new version of the 150-600 aswell and it beats the crap out everything else.
Could you make a video explaining why some people think focus breathing is such a big issue? I know for some video applications it is a problem when you want to shift focus from very close to wide or vice versa, but why do some photographers rant about it, especially the old Nikkor 70-200 and this new tamron? Mr TN would have me believe that this lens and the old Nikkor for that matter is completely useless for any kind of portrait shooting
people like that are BUTTON SNIFFERS…….they bitch and moan about every little damn thing for no reason. …….video work its an issue, …..i was repairing lenses 20 years before he ever picked up a camera :/ ….. the Tamron focus breaths UP CLOSE….however only few years ago you couldnt even BUY (it didnt exist) a 70 200 that would focus that damn close……all the talking heads on the www complaining about focus breathing at 6 feet or less is invalid……while you CAN use the lens (NOW) really damn close….im not worried about focus breathing at 6 feet or less on a telephoto meant to be used basically at 10+ feet 99.9999% of the time
he has, pure fact, never touched this lens, ive been testing the piss out of it…… :/ heheh
If my Nikon VrI 70-200 takes a fall I will be getting this. I love what Tamron is doing these days.
It's May 2021 & found your review. I will be buying this today. Thanks!
This is a wonderful review! Thanks so much.
You know the one set of photogs who would use a 70-200mm close to the minimal focusing distance where focus breathing might matter, is headshot photogs. That's what I do. Now I'm not even sure if I'm thinking rightly of it, so that's why I ask.. I have the first VR Nikon 70-200 and it's focus breathing is minimal. I think like 190 effectively but I'm not certain. So my question is this: Does focus breathing effect the quality of the bokeh? Is it strictly a field of view issue? Or if I want softer nose and ears and tack sharp eyes, is it even an issue that I can't get a true 200mm from something like the Tamron closer to the minimal focusing distance. Thanks again for all you do for the community of photogs at large. [BTW my go to lens for headshots now is the 135mm f/2 Nikkor, I'm noticing more moire with it, does that make any sense?]
which, the f2 DC nikkor?
I have the G2 in order since last monday. I'm glad I did not buy the Nikon VR III fluorite at 3179 €
Tested the Tamron G1 around xmas but it was not sharper than my old Nikon 70-210, so decided so save for the VR III and return the G1. Bokeh and saturation with the G1 was very nice. With the G2, there's no more reason to buy the VR III.
Looking at your skateboard shots, the lens delivers. G2 sharpness is crazy, which could not be said of the G1.
i sold off my G1 last week
Great info, thanks! Any idea how it compares to the Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM? Specifically for shooting soccer in the evening under the lights?
i never review sigma stuff, theyre the devil :)
I just bought this lens and love it!!! I shot a wedding on Sunday and WOW. My Fuji is still great for colour balance in mixed light conditions but the 70-200 will be attached at hip. Mine says made in Japan not China.
I use this lens all the time with my D-850. I am happy with the results and highly recommend it and Tamron lenses.
You forgot to mention that there is a Tamron docking for the focus adjustement and firmware updates.....something what Nikon, Canon and Fony lens has to go to service center.
yes, i know, and yes i forgot to mention is….thats here
www.tamron.co.jp/en/lineup/tapin/
Theoria Apophasis Yeah, otherwise has to go to "service center", last episode with Olympus did not went well for me, send lens due to motor clicking during video, got it back after 5 days, they cleaned something and the1y made scratch on the colar ring at the front element...and guess what damn thing clicked again.Luckly my mate (owner of the camera shop and dealer ) arranged brand new replacement. So the conclusion: It does not metter which company has own service and repaire own lenses and camera, if there is terible technician there hi will be able to screw up a stone if you give him to repair.
jj p Hmmmm I did not mentioned Sigma here...they suppose to have also docking , since I'm not using any of them including Sony E-mount I would not know how 85 f1.8 G masta...is doing.Had combo a7r II with 90mm macro while ago to try out, nothing wrong for macro, for my taste a bit on short side for insects and small creatures.
jj p Have nothing to slam , I own a lot of A-mount Sony/Minolta stuff, so get a grip before making slaming statements.
If you ever get the chance, I would like to hear your thoughts (review) on the Tamron 150-600mm g2. Basically the same price as the Nikon 200-500mm, but the extra reach for bird photography might make the difference. If the new Tamron 70-200mm kicks ass so might the new Tamron 150-600?
the nikkor 200 500 is king of the hill there,…ive used the tamron, and i agree with most, its not neaerly as good as the nikkor 200 500…… no, the VR on the 200 500 nikkor blasts everything down the pooper. not to mention better image rendering
For someone never owning any of the Tamron 70-200mm (or any 70-200mm) what would one recommend? Do I purchase the latest or buy the previous version used for cheaper? I' am not a professional photographer simply an enthusiast and mainly shoot family and wildlife. Would appreciate some advice from anyone. Great review! Thanks!
Excellent video, great advice. Many thanks for sharing.
I really like this lens, it arrived yesterday and I'm simply blown away by its resolution, VC and sharpness. It's quite and fast. Closeup shots such as head shots fantastic Thanks for the recommendation. Now what's that end switch for panning.
end switch what?
On the lens the first switch is VC Mode/1 and under it it's 2and 3 what's 2&3
Excellent job Ken. I'd made a mental decision to only buy Nikkor lenses but Tamron are really killing it with pretty much every lens they release. My next lens purchase has to be a 24 - 70, I'll have to wait until Tamron release their G2 of this zoom before I consider buying, especially as the Nikkor 24 - 70 VR is horrendously expensive. Kudos to you on your fair and exhaustive testing 😃
…..its obvious tamron wants to wipe dirty baby diapers in everyones face with this lens……..insane stooopid cheap, and on 90% of things, its better than the $2800 nikkor
Theoria Apophasis They are also giving the finger to Sigma too. If money was no object I'd still opt for the Nikkor but by this showing Tamron are doing everything right yet still making the lenses affordable ☺
dunnymonster Did you buy the 24-70 Tamron???
I know you just spent even more money on the new G2 Tamron, but would you be willing to also test the new Tamron 10-24 f3.5-4.5? I rented the Nikon 12-24 f4 and I didn't like the bad lens flare that I got with it. I shoot against the sun a lot with super wide angles.
Nevermind, I just saw that you posted a video saying you're already doing that. Lol. Thanks!
thank you so much. Bought the Tokina 100 mm 2.8 macro based off of your recommendation. Going to buy the Tokina 11-20 mm 2.8 next month. I was keen on this review from you and probably get this by Jun/Jul.
I slapped that like button before I watch this ....Bring it on Ken...bring it
I just bought mine and its just arrived last few days ago. Oh, I'm gutted. It cant track running dogs especially when oncoming even if they are just jogging. I take action shots of dogs, thats basically all I use the camera for. With the Tamron I maybe get 1 hit per 10-20 missed. It was meant to be an upgrade to the nikkor 70-200 f4 that has done me well for years but nothing is better except it opens to 2.8. I'm using a d4, single or 9 focus points and continuous focus. I've made a gamble and just bought the tap in console to see if a firmware update will improve things.
so how was your tamron 70-200 g2 now?
@@freddiefernandez522 I traded it in for a nikon 70-200 2.8 which can track action better, but not any better than the 70-200 f4, but very good. Tamron is a great lens though but not a sport lens imo.
@@weeangelini4004 but in weddings and eventz does the focus enough?
@freddie fernandez oh yeah, perfect for that. I take action photos of dogs and dogs move faster than people, the lens couldnt keep up with tracking that, but for weddings and events I think it will perform brilliantly, its a fab lens. In low light it performs better than any lens Ive used, it can see and snap to objects I cant see with my own eyes. For you, I'd get it, and you'll have no regrets unless you want to track very fast moving subjects. It's not a slow focusing lens, it is fast but not fast-action fast
@@weeangelini4004 thanks for the response .. i got to get one
Great truth telling. I own one and it is quick, sharp and love color rendering.
Thanks Theoria I can't wait to sell my old Tarmon also and I almost purchased the Nikon and then the Tamron came on the scene, it's not March and I am ready. The review was great and very timely, I was excited that you had the actual lens to test against the Nikon and all the lesser issues can be corrected in post with no problem. Keep up your great work.
i have to sell mine now too :P
Ebay here I come.
Awesome Full review finally from a straight talker !
no yackety yackety :P ROFL actually i do flap my lips too much
How does this lens compare to the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 is ii usm? Thanks for the feedback. By the way. Great review. Much appreciated.
i never review canons stuff
Ken, I gladly donated a little while ago 5 dollars to you. I believe you deserve to get this lens for free for all of the valuable work that you are doing for us. You earned it over and over. I encourage all of your followers to donate and make sure that you get this lens for free from all of us, plus even get some extra cash for your work. Knowledge is valuable and it should be remunerated
Keep up the good work. :)
wassssabi man!!! well i dunno if i deserve that…ill have to sell something to offset the cost, but this lens is amazing……i was kinda hoping it SUCKED, that way i could justify returning it,……no chance of that however.. :)
been out testing it today too ….of course all testing is really over, i pounded it 9 ways to sunday to verify what it is :)
Hey buddy, you did a great job, and YES, you deserve it. Is the law of universal energy, I CANNOT BE A ONE STREET only. you give us, and we, as a group should give back to you !! I am saving to get it myself. LOL!!!
just ordered one. Note that in Canada, it's more expensive and it's not half the price of the Nikon. Nikon is 2400$ and new Tamron is 1800$.
Also I saw Nikkor 70-200mm has price reduction this morning here from 2600$ to 2400$. Sign they feel the concurence?
And surprise Canon's 70-200mm is also on sale from 2800$ to 2500$.
whuuut? the nikkor VRIII is $2800 here…… and your Tamron (well thats canadian) …hmm whats that in USD
i think youre talking about the VRII, the VRIII just came out and is VERY expensive .$2800 USD
really??? which one? the VRII or the new VRIII nikkor????
still $2800 here
www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=1292140&gclid=CPz7sYXUuNICFcy2wAod6JwFoA&is=REG&ap=y&m=Y&c3api=1876%2C92051678642%2C&A=details&Q=
Love your channel. Keep up the good work. Partly based on your previous review of the previous Tamron 70-200 2.8, I have been saving up for it for my Canon 70D. At the beginning of this review you said there is no comparison between the two and that the previous model is now obsolete compared to this one. Can you perhaps compare them both or talk about why the newer model is so much better? I'm also wondering if I should still go ahead and buy the previous model if it comes down in price as it is still a great lens according to the internet (and yourself). Thank you and kind regards.
relative to the 1st gen tamron , which i also have (and about to sell) …, its night and day diff, especially the VR……when i found out how insane the new tamron was, i switched the testing then only comparing it to the new Nikkor 70 200 2.8 VRIII ($2800). ……
the Tamron focus breaths UP CLOSE….however only few years ago you couldnt even BUY (it didnt exist) a 70 200 that would focus that damn close……all the talking heads on the www complaining about focus breathing at 6 feet or less is invalid……while you CAN use the lens (NOW) really damn close….im not worried about focus breathing at 6 feet or less on a telephoto meant to be used basically at 10+ feet 99.9999% of the time
Hey, thanks for the reply. I agree with you on the focus breathing being obsolete. People's gripe may stem from the fact that the 1st gen model was a macro lens, whereas the 2nd and 3rd gen are not.
What I'm confused about, though, is when you refer to the 1st gen Tamron, and the previous model. From what I understand there have been two previous models, one with VR (or VC) and one without. When you say they are worlds apart, are you referring to the previous model being Di VC USD? That is the one with Vibration Control, which according to my research was worlds apart from its predecessor, the Di LD (IF) which was also a macro lens but didn't have the VR/VC.
The Di VC USD was supposed to have amazing VR, the only problem was the AF wasn't up to par with the Nikon or Canon models. If you're saying the VR in the new G2 is worlds apart from the Di VC USD, I'm finding it difficult to understand how it could have improved over the previous model which was supposed to be excellent in every way already. I'm guessing the AF has improved significantly too?
I wouldn't have this much interest in writing such a long winded response only I was very interested in the Di VC USD which is practically half the price of the Canon/Nikor. The fact that I could purchase the 24-70 AND 70-200 for the same price as the Canon/Nikon lens makes it a no brainer for me. So I guess compared to the 2nd gen Di VC USD, is there much difference?
Why is Tony & Chel saying they will not even review the lens because it focus breathes "way too much"?!?!?! Thats just stupid! Thanks for your insight.. Do you think the focus breathing is that significant in this lens?
they dont know anything…… only at 6 feet or less, which is meaningless, this damn lens isnt meant for use that close.
Was there more than one generation of this lens, I notice on EBay some sellers mention G2, some others do not say G2 in their description. Thank you, P.S. I miss visiting family in Pike County KY.
Thanks for the fast review. How is the 3d pop and micro contrast of this lens? Is it true that this 23 element lens can compete with my Nikkor 2.8 135 prime lens at 135mm? How is the flaring and vignetting? Should I sell my 150$ prime and buy the zoom?
none of these zooms are going to compete with ANY even "good" prime, much less a great one
Looking forward to you reviewing the upcoming Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport lens and comparing it to this one. As always, great job on this review Ken. Thank you.
My bad Ken... I wasn't aware that you weren't a Sigma fan. I was going to hold off on buying the Tamron lens since the Sigma was near the same price point.
Thanks for measuring the focus breathing. Really good to know.
Are you saying that loosing 50mm isn't a freaking issue? It sure is for me. If I'm going to pay $1300 for a lens that's 70-200mm, I want 70-200mm!
I bought it in June and I love it. At 1379€ it wasn't exactly a bargain for me but it is true that compared to other lenses this is an amazing value.
At the moment I have two lenses for my animal photography in my bag. This 70-200/2.8 and the Sigma 100-400 f/whatever.
These two lenses work so well together for me, they do everything I need.
The only issue I have with them is... That they both got cheaper a few weeks after I bought them XD But hey I am happy with them so it's fine.
Thank you for the complete and thorough review. Since I don't have $1,300 to upgrade to G2, would you be able to tell me how close the G1 is to the G2. Is it 80-90% or not even that close? Thank you again
not close :) heheh
Hi Ken, I'm a bit confused about your comparison of the Tamron G2 compared to the Tamron G1 although that was the purpose to make a comparison between the two-How ever you have given a absolute in-depth in the pass of the Tamron G1 against the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 and yes i've purchase the Tamron G1 and save lots of money and was able to shot both indoors studio and outdoor..
But now for to sell my Tamron G1 and get the Tamron G2 I need more then just no comparison to Nikon 70-200 and Tamron G1..Please give us detail from glass color rendition and contrast etc....
Never mind-I'm going to my local camera store and test the Tamron G2 to the G1..I can't wait to see what's the big difference.
Can you take a few pictures of "stars"/"planets" with it and post a link plz?? If you are up late, and its nice out of course! :P
yes indeedy, i had planned on doing that yes :)
But you didn't guided me on Tokina Opera 16-28mm. Should I buy or not?
Ken, how this lens compares to the tamron 70-200mm 2.8 vc usd? is this a new version (G2?) I'm confused. Is the 2.8 VC USD any good?
On another note, any thoughts about the 24-70 2.8 vc tamron?
Food for thought ! I use my lenses for 20%Landscape / 40%portrait / 40% Bird photography. Do i actually go for 70-200 G2 + 1.7/2.0 converter or Nikkor 200-500. I own 70-300 nikkor AF-P VR right now...
This is an old video but since I am a hair away from pushing the buy button on the tamron lens. In your flickr comparison fotos I mostly see the d500 as tested camera . Did you test on FX? All lenses are better in the center so Clearly a cropped image may look better.
I maybe would be willing to buy the insanely expensive nikon FL but not it it isn't at least "30% better".
Thanks Ken. You just saved me a lot of money!
i did? :)
So would you be happy pairing the Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2 with the new D850?
ill find out in a few days
Thank you my Lens MAN, you done it again, no BS... Tamron should get ready for the high demand base on a REAL review, and they should be calling soon. Dont worry about the $$$ you spend on it. We will take care of you!!!!! Love you man!!
thank you sir! :P and i paid taxes on it too Grrrrrrr :( :/
I love my Nikkor 80-200 that you recommended, VR aside is the G2 worth upgrading from that?
Had my 70-200 G2 for about 5 days off your recommendation...and I must say: its FUCKING incredible...I shot night pool side portraits on my D850 at 1/40 of a second (with a strobe duh.... I’m not crazy) and the photos are SHARPER than a porcupines pubic hairs
This lense’s VC practically bypasses that high MP camera shake notion that all these UA-cam photographers “preach” about...
My copy worked right out the box, no tap console thingy needed
Thanks again Sir Ken
Hi many thanks for review. I think will be very interesting to see a short movie with AF speed of both latest lens (nikon and tamron 70-200) Will be interesting to see how the AF performs in good light and low light but without strong contrast. And see whitch is the best. For this tipe of lens AF speed and accuracy is very important.
All the best!
what do you think about the built quality of the tamron G2 ? can it last for 10 years?
I use 70-200 for head shots and I am usually 4-5 feet away. So yes focus breathing is an issue. That said, I love all my Tamrons :-)
I have the previous version of the Tamron 70-200. It's an amazing lens. Is the new G2 version that much better than the previous? Will it be worth the upgrade? Also, my version was made in Japan : )
You are the Rocky Balboa of photography...you always duke it out...how many rounds did this one go?
ive been beating the hell out of this lens…..its Fing EPIC
since i paid out of pocket for it (and taxes too), …i was KINDA hoping it stunk……..no chance of that now, its unfreakingbelievable …… last night live stream people thought i was LYING about this lens when i said it was the epic ta-tas
Tammy, Tammy, Tammy!
Focus breathing is a real issue if you want to do focus stacking to get extreme DOF landscapes.
no its not….3 years + ago you couldnt even get a 70 200 to focus at 4 feet or less, so it doesnt matter……anyone hot to use a 70 200 at 4 or 5 feet has a screw loose. :) hehehehe
this lens is awesome
I don't doubt you that the lens is awesome Ken, but focus breathing is an issue when focus stacking. I had exactly that problem yesterday and it was not something I had even considered before. I was trying to compress the perspective with the long lens (@200MM) on a beach scene with a distant lighthouse, sand dunes and a river estuary in the mid ground and a load of driftwood in the foreground. The driftwood changed size as I changed the focus distance. I don’t know if there is anything can be done about that. Any suggestions?
ohhh geez, focus stacking your shots for crazy DOF, thats gonna be an issue yes for sure combined with breathing.
I have been shooting with this lens with the d500 and I've notice when I use group area AF, sometimes my focus seems to be slighty off. Does this lens need calibration or adjustments?
Going to start saving up for this one. I'm a Canon user, so I'll be interested to see how it stacks up against the 70-200 II in terms of focus breathing.
What I am more interested in is, does it have a lower magnification (at the same distance) than the other 70-200s (beyond 14 feet) due to the effects of focus breathing. I'm looking at this lens for weddings and events, where the larger magnification of the Canon is still attractive.
im sure to assume the canon is equally as epic….. :) i was comaring this against the VRIII $2800 new lens.
beyond 14 feet, no, negligible …nothing… the bad focus breathing is 6 feet and less……but thats NO issue.. the Tamron focus breaths UP CLOSE….however only few years ago you couldnt even BUY (it didnt exist) a 70 200 that would focus that damn close……all the talking heads on the www complaining about focus breathing at 6 feet or less is invalid……while you CAN use the lens (NOW) really damn close….im not worried about focus breathing at 6 feet or less on a telephoto meant to be used basically at 10+ feet 99.9999% of the time
Theoria Apophasis Thanks so much for the reply. it makes so much sense, now that you have made sense of the whole focus breathing brouhaha. I'm looking to use it for shooting from a distance, and as long as it gives me the same magnification as any other 70-200, I know I'm good.
I just bought one today and can’t wait to test it
Great work Ken! Just what I need - ANOTHER 70-200 :-)
its only $1300 and better than the nikkor….thats your car floor change, Daddy Warbucks :) heheheheh!! ;) kidding ya
Hi Ken,
Ordered the Tamron 70-200 g2 after watching your videos. Coming from the Nikon 2.8 vrii I can tell it’s an awesome lens. The copy I got is soft at 2.8 70mm. I’m wondering if I should send it back for an exchange?... or is it being soft something that can be fixed with the tap console? Appreciate all of your videos. Cheers!
I got my TAMRON SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 today but will get the time to us it, it's late, but will play with tomorrow.
lemmie know, im taking mine on a gig tomorrow
I will get some shooting done this weekend, I just need a subject now. One thing that I don't recall in your review, is the 6 year warranty that comes with the US version, that shows that a company really stands behind their product.
You raved so much about the Nikkor 70-200e and now say the tamron is that much better? I bought the new Nikon 70-200e. Should I sell it off and get the tamron instead? Or keep it?
i never said that much better....... its $1500 cheaper, a HAIR sharper.....the rendering is a bit less saturated, its heavier, the zoom ring is NOWHERE near as smooth......
its a STEAL at $1300.....keep teh nikkor.
Sounds good. and yeah I've been getting really used to the zoom ring and the colors are awesome. Especially coming from the tamron 70-200 g1
I need something that focuses better for fast moving sports shots. I want a good bang for the buck. Right now using a 50 1.8G and 105 1.4E which I love but don't perform well for fast moving. Do you guys think this is a good choice? would it focus better and faster for sports than my 50 1.8G?
Got one today. A great lens so far on a Canon 6dii. My first Tamron wasand is a 28-75/2,8 14 years ago. Since then I'm hooked on Tamron SP.
Do you still feel the same about the lens two years later? Currently I have 80-200 2.8 and I’m thinking about up grading to the Tamron.
I'm sold due to your enthusiasm for this lens.
Have you been able to review the new TAMRON 24-70mm G2 lens?
i will next week
Tamron G2 will be next purchase & also get the Nikon 200-500 f5.6 all for less than the "VRIII". Thanks for the review
those are 2 lenses that would give any glasshole a warm fuzzy :)
in Vietnam u can buy used mint condition tamron 70-200 g2 at 800-900 usd
Finally I can buy it now!!! Thanks Ken!!
Its the epic Ta-Tas for sure :P
Hi Ken. Thanks for your support. I have one question. Is that Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2 SO good ... that I can pass Nikkor 180 2.8 and shoot similar images with this Tamron? Please help because I consider one of the two lenses. Thank you.
I just purchased the new Tamron 70-200mm G2 today and I've been comparing it to my Nikon 70-200mm VR2. My VR2 is definitely slightly sharper than the G2. I'm wondering if I need to do some AF micro-adjustments or perhaps I didn't get a great copy.
you have test shots
lets hope theyre tripod shots
www.flickr.com/photos/129412475@N03/33224724441/in/datetaken-public/
www.flickr.com/photos/129412475@N03/33224726811/in/datetaken-public/
Here are two shots that pretty much summarize what I've been getting for the most part. Yes, both shots taken on a tripod with a 2 sec shutter delay and exact same settings.
Thus far I am really liking the G2 but I did expect it to out resolve my VR2.
i see shutter shake on the tamron,.....take 10 shots with each lens, not just one
ken do you have a review on the tamron 90 2.8 g2
macro
What about the QC process. Is this the first Tamron lens made in China?
noooo, the last 70 200 2.8 was (during its later production) was also made in china…… the eARLY ones were japan made.
this lens is now #1 BEST VALUE…period, …
Should I sell the Nikkor VR3 and buy the Tam. for doing weddings?
Hey Ken, did you try this lens on your D7100? It was out of focus on all 3 of my D7100, even at f4. Had to tune it to +16 and even that wasn't really good. maybe it got a bad copy.
Hey bud, excellent review. Have you tried macro on this lens? Is it good for product photography? Thanks
So now we need a Gen2 24-70 f2.8 Tamron! Ken's wallet will scream
now i have to sell off my old tammy VC 70 200 :/
would love that, i have the current 24-70, not as well built and robust as the Nikkor, but gets the job done! Judging from the step up they made with the 15-30 and now the new Gen2 70-200, things are looking great, not to mention the new design (getting rid of the gold) looks so much better! My best buy ever is that 15-30. Many thanks to mr AP for that, one year shooting and zero issues with it. On and upwards tamron!