right now sitting in the classroom in DXB with Emirates Engineering joining the A380 B1/B2 Type Training. I'd really love to see AIRBUS continuing to produce this big bird. Even better in a -1000 version!!
As an Australian recreational traveller, I actively book only the A 380 on overseas trips, flying on Qantas, Emirates, Singapore and or Qatar to European destination. Why: comfort, adequate space and significant lower noise levels to the likes of the B777. It still amazes me that very few of US airports have the capacity to accommodate the craft, thus denying US travellers the opportunity to experience the many positives.
You know what Americans are like - if it isn't invented here we don't want it, just look at the Concord. This is why so many ppl have the hates on Boeing.
Due to Boeing's well publicised difficulties, passangers' confidence in the safety of its planes, even if imagined, may well be a factor in airlines' future plans outside the USA
@@planespottingwithabdullah 🤣🤣🤣 I couldn't be further away from a daily mail journalist.... passenger confidence has been the demise of many companies in the airline industry
With all that is already available from Airbus and Boeing at the moment, all types of their airplanes are enough to cover all possibilities. It will take sometime before one of the two announce a new aircraft. Airbus with its A-220, A-321XLR and A-350 along with Boeing with their 737MAX, 787 and 777 is quite enough for quite sometime. Airlines will not buy new models as all their purchases back-log will cover their needs for the next 50 years. So I don't believe we will see another new model appear on the market before 2035.
In fact fitting more modern engines to the 380 is perfectly feasible and previously applied to earlier designs,notably the DC8.The engines used on the 350 and 787 could be adapted fairly easily and 4 fitted to the 380.Further in the future new designs such as the ultrafan would work.I have been surprised high capacity airlines such as Air India don't snap the low hours second hand 380s on the market.Maybe they will but I suspect the owners mostly leasers would find this difficult.The Air France fleet,Thai airlines spring to mind also.
Yes. If they intend to produce the A380 again, changing to new engines is the most important thing. If they are viable, having to get certified again is not an issue.
@@FLIGAVIA Emirates has retired 7 A380s and still keeps 116. Singapore Airlines has retired 12 A380s and still keeps 12. Imagine Airlines having to retire planes to get USED spare parts for other planes. REMEMBER similar history. Airbus made the decision to stop making new spares in 2003 for the Concorde, so the Concorde owners had to resort to cannibalised parts by retiring some Concorde. The CONCORDE was forced to die by Airbus.
The prestige carriers would love to keep these going for a good many years, however the basic gist of the video about delays to promised orders of twin jet wide bodies is right. How many carriers will keep the A380 going once these orders start to be fulfilled? Oddly I do think that the stretch A380 with the possibility of more capacity might be a good bet. It would be a huge boon to be able to offer more seats on a handful of the worlds densest travel routes, even if turnaround times have to be slightly longer. I'm not sure if the discussion about Ultrafan is really a factor; by the time these engines see service it will be too late for any current A380s in original design. I think history will judge the A380 as about 30 years ahead of its time, as.something of a pioneer which couldn't quite reach its planned potential. That said, I would love to do a long haul in business or 1st class on one.
I flew with Singapore Airlines and BA on their A380's in economy and they were so much better than the 747's, I would love to see another A380 designed with 2 upto date engines instead of 4
Several airlines like the point to point system though they can't fly it with large aircraft of any type. It won't eclipse the long haul flights needed as Emirates has shown the world how they could achieve it. Many airlines such as Lufthansa, British Airways, Emirates, Qantas among others are exploiting it with great success. The hub system is here to stay as it has demonstrated all its benefits. Otherwise we will end up with a huge number of A-220 flying point to point. Ryanair is different as it bought several small airlines which has made possible, Ryanair full potential.
I just only know about what happened to AIRBUS A380 because of stop production on 2021 years ago during COVID-19 pandemic still spreading across the world and then return until this year of 2024 just like as I already heard about Global Airlines use AIRBUS A380 and for AIR INDIA about A380 it's only plan. Even, Garuda Indonesia if add more AIRBUS just like A380 it's only plan for Umroh/Hajj route as I know. This video what did @FLIGAVIA make it more new update about what happened to AIRBUS A380 is true.
👍, Not surprised at all, important to add that is also the passengers plane of choice; We will love to see an A380 neo🤞
Thank for your feedback
Long live the KING A380
😎
right now sitting in the classroom in DXB with Emirates Engineering joining the A380 B1/B2 Type Training. I'd really love to see AIRBUS continuing to produce this big bird. Even better in a -1000 version!!
We are dreaming about it!
Ain't no airport with facilities for a 1000 passenger aircraft.
It is possible that no new ones will be built but I believe the +250 built will live on for a long time.
As an Australian recreational traveller, I actively book only the A 380 on overseas trips, flying on Qantas, Emirates, Singapore and or Qatar to European destination. Why: comfort, adequate space and significant lower noise levels to the likes of the B777. It still amazes me that very few of US airports have the capacity to accommodate the craft, thus denying US travellers the opportunity to experience the many positives.
You know what Americans are like - if it isn't invented here we don't want it, just look at the Concord. This is why so many ppl have the hates on Boeing.
US airlines have low demand for huge aircraft like the A380
Due to Boeing's well publicised difficulties, passangers' confidence in the safety of its planes, even if imagined, may well be a factor in airlines' future plans outside the USA
ok daily mail journalist
@@planespottingwithabdullah 🤣🤣🤣 I couldn't be further away from a daily mail journalist.... passenger confidence has been the demise of many companies in the airline industry
I say yes to the A380. Also, we need an A360 and A370
Yeah, that’s gonna blowing the aviation with a360 and a370
With all that is already available from Airbus and Boeing at the moment, all types of their airplanes are enough to cover all possibilities. It will take sometime before one of the two announce a new aircraft. Airbus with its A-220, A-321XLR and A-350 along with Boeing with their 737MAX, 787 and 777 is quite enough for quite sometime. Airlines will not buy new models as all their purchases back-log will cover their needs for the next 50 years. So I don't believe we will see another new model appear on the market before 2035.
As long as Airbus is not able to deliver enough A350, the A380 will keep on flying. In a few weeks I will fly with the A380 from MUC to BKK... 😊
Have a great trip!
Here to stay, unless wars break out
Another pandemic. Also a shame that there were no better engines to fit it. Saw it in HK while on its world tour. This thing is ginormous.
In fact fitting more modern engines to the 380 is perfectly feasible and previously applied to earlier designs,notably the DC8.The engines used on the 350 and 787 could be adapted fairly easily and 4 fitted to the 380.Further in the future new designs such as the ultrafan would work.I have been surprised high capacity airlines such as Air India don't snap the low hours second hand 380s on the market.Maybe they will but I suspect the owners mostly leasers would find this difficult.The Air France fleet,Thai airlines spring to mind also.
Yes. If they intend to produce the A380 again, changing to new engines is the most important thing. If they are viable, having to get certified again is not an issue.
This plane is loved by the passengers, but not profit enough by the airlines. Airlines will be sorry.
It's right with huge airlines such as Emirates, Singapore Airlines...
@@FLIGAVIA Emirates has retired 7 A380s and still keeps 116.
Singapore Airlines has retired 12 A380s and still keeps 12.
Imagine Airlines having to retire planes to get USED spare parts for other planes.
REMEMBER similar history.
Airbus made the decision to stop making new spares in 2003 for the Concorde, so the Concorde owners had to resort to cannibalised parts by retiring some Concorde. The CONCORDE was forced to die by Airbus.
The prestige carriers would love to keep these going for a good many years, however the basic gist of the video about delays to promised orders of twin jet wide bodies is right. How many carriers will keep the A380 going once these orders start to be fulfilled? Oddly I do think that the stretch A380 with the possibility of more capacity might be a good bet. It would be a huge boon to be able to offer more seats on a handful of the worlds densest travel routes, even if turnaround times have to be slightly longer. I'm not sure if the discussion about Ultrafan is really a factor; by the time these engines see service it will be too late for any current A380s in original design. I think history will judge the A380 as about 30 years ahead of its time, as.something of a pioneer which couldn't quite reach its planned potential. That said, I would love to do a long haul in business or 1st class on one.
Thanks for the view and comment. I think the design of the A380 is good enough, no need to extend it, the important thing is the engine.
Would it be nice to AB/RR working on a Twin engine A380, by improving the aircraft’s weight with lighter material similar to the A350?
I think they will improve.
I flew with Singapore Airlines and BA on their A380's in economy and they were so much better than the 747's, I would love to see another A380 designed with 2 upto date engines instead of 4
Yes.
Two engines would have to be extra sized to push that airframe forward. Look at those on the A-350 or on the B-777 and muliply by one point five or 2.
@@geoffreymartinez7208 Yes I know, but it was only wishful thinking on my part
Several airlines like the point to point system though they can't fly it with large aircraft of any type. It won't eclipse the long haul flights needed as Emirates has shown the world how they could achieve it. Many airlines such as Lufthansa, British Airways, Emirates, Qantas among others are exploiting it with great success. The hub system is here to stay as it has demonstrated all its benefits. Otherwise we will end up with a huge number of A-220 flying point to point. Ryanair is different as it bought several small airlines which has made possible, Ryanair full potential.
I just only know about what happened to AIRBUS A380 because of stop production on 2021 years ago during COVID-19 pandemic still spreading across the world and then return until this year of 2024 just like as I already heard about Global Airlines use AIRBUS A380 and for AIR INDIA about A380 it's only plan. Even, Garuda Indonesia if add more AIRBUS just like A380 it's only plan for Umroh/Hajj route as I know. This video what did @FLIGAVIA make it more new update about what happened to AIRBUS A380 is true.
If you watched our video before. We had a video about Emirate plan of its A380, Singapore, BA, Lufthansa, some huge airlines. So it's the truth.
No it it didn't shock everyone not me for starters
Are you shocked? 😁
Just dreaming if you think there will be a new build.
We are dreaming about it.
2nd
Congratulations my friend
What sort of english is the title ?? american.....
Not American
Honest mistake.
AI crap
What a load of rubbish.