Відео

USA is no longer on the list of Stable Democracys. It is less than 4 years since the last atempt of a coup t'ètat, carried out ba a unstable president that lost the election. Then the preisente representing the "tuff on crime" party was not punished for it, and on top of that this wana-be dictator was elected again, by the mayority of the population , showing to the world how brain dead they are. When the producer of military equipement have the right to say if it alowes sale and donations of it to other countries, like we now see with the war in Ukraine. Ukraine have goten a lot uf US made wepons, donato by USA allied nations, but have not been alowed, by USA, to use it into russia. And now they have re-elected this wana-be dictator who says he dont care about Europe and thretening to take USA out of Nato. I think European countries are smart to not buy from the USA. It could get them into difficult situations in the future. Even buying a Boeing passenger plane comes with a risk. We saw that in october 2018 when a 5 month old 737 Max plane lost its engine departing Dubai. It had to go down in Iran. It stayed in Iran until February before they where able to get it out. A few days later all 737 max, all over the world was grounded. The 737 have newer carried anny passengers since it went down in Iran over 6 years ago. I think the good advice is to stay away from buying any thing US made.

Hey ! I remember this, it's the AIRBUS A330 mrtt. I really heard about Indonesia will bought AIRBUS A330 mrtt for Indonesian National Army Air Force as Prabowo Subianto bought. But, Prabowo Subianto has already become the new Indonesia's President now after Joko Widodo has already step down for the end of era. Oh, not only AIRBUS A330 mrtt that Indonesia bought it for military. Even from AIRBUS A400m, AIRBUS Helicopter, AIRBUS fighter plane, HELI AKS, HELI H225M and Rafale's fighter plane that Indonesia bought it for military too.

Russia already dominates in the nuclear energy industry, and now in electric gas generation .

Unfortunately for Boeing, the issues experienced by the USAF are the best sales pitch for the Airbus. Having an aircraft based on a civillian airliner at the end of its production life (with just the existing freighter orders to be fulfilled) v one now to be based on a significant recent upgrade to the civillian version has to help. The civilian version of the Airbus is starting to see increasing orders, so it presumably benefits more from ongoing economies of scale, whereas the Boeing only benefits from economies ontained through its own increased orders.

The MRTT is the better aircraft with the better fuel refueling system. The US government overruled the USAF's decision.

If you knew anything about Australia you'd know how much Australians can't stand Alan Joyce.

The USAF got an aircraft it did'nt want, they wanted the MRTT, but Boeing got it's lobbiests to lobby in Congress & the politicians killed the MRTT. So well done USA your Air Force got a plane it did'nt want, & look at the trouble they've had with it since.

MRTT won the USAF contract until Boeing got its senators working.

Good morning, hahaha, this is Putin Wunderwaffen????? That is all, bay from Europe 😏😉😉😉😜😜😜😃

And their Trent 1000 engiine on Dreamliner is a FLOP.. say BA

🇬🇷❤❤❤🇷🇺💪✌️

Having dealt with Russian companies, in this sector, I call el todo excremento on this 'ACHIEVEMENT

Russland kann alles selber produzieren das ist sehr gut wen man unabhängig ist ,weiter so Russland ist eine Supermacht !

Not as if there have not been issues with GE and P&W engines is it..........

Quite a achievement for “gas station”

Boeing planes are looking like jaded upgrades these days and their QA failures are enough to give passengers the willies..

Narrator forgot to mention *WHY* Russia annexed Crimea. ..it was *because* of the western funded 7Billion$ coup overthrowing the legitimate government of Ukr , putting the Russian sea base contract under threat. .. Russia went in to secure Crimea as a reaction to western aggressive actions

🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪💪💪👍👍🎉🎉🎉✌️✌️✌️ from Malaysia 🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾

It's surprising that the Boeing entry wasn't the 787-10.

Russians was capable of building any turbines for their aviation industry and others, Russians has their own Mire space station 🚉 which has worked for many years plus they had this technology capability before that why they built it own turbines in less time.

1

1

2

So people from Australia's biggest city - Melbourne...... won't be getting this service either ?.

Congratulations, you can’t have name-dropped the Trent any more in one report than if you had just repeated the name over and over again…….

USA BOEING

I think the reason why Qantas went with Airbus is because the 777x keeps on getting n delayed and the a350 is currently available and tested

Needs Must. Congratulations. The West Slowly running out of Leverage.

Typical inexperienced foreign company/government, setting up offices in HK is understandable but seting up office in SINGAPORE ? Wrong, my friend, for cost and facilities, it should be Malaysia/Indonesia. SINGAPORE Prime Minster is a Governor of the 51st state of the US.

I don’t like AI chat bot content.

Buy Flying Coffin boeing 737 max ,you can go to heaven in one minute

They got the gear box from P&W? 😅😅😅

1

Just for the title, you can forget about it. The petulance of trying to face off the C-130 on equal terms and claiming that it destroys it… wake up and smell the coffee. The C-130 is established all over NATO. You don’t take down a proven airplane like that. Nor do you call it rubbish. Time will tell how long the 390 will last and how deep it can penetrate the market. It may be the new kid on the block, but it still has a lot to prove. It’s an interesting project, a clone from the Kawasaki C1, so take off points for creativity. Many other countries participated in the project, meaning that this cannot be considered a full blown Embraer airplane. Too much foreign engineering. So tone down with the bragging, and let time reveal who is best. Also, Brazil isn’t part of NATO, which doesn’t make it one bit easy for its implementation in those countries. Any orders will take a lot of time to be fulfilled as production capacity is really small at this point. The 130 will still be around for decades. It could still outlast the 390, who knows? The point is, no one is going to scrap their trusted airplanes to go running to a company that is trying to implement its first military cargo airplane. It’s more complex than just the airplane’s features, it’s also NATO’s ecosystem, it the accumulated knowledge and expertise of the pilots and maintenance staff, and there’s politics also. So maybe people should focus more on improving and less on bragging. Learn to walk before trying to run, and maybe things will turn out fine. Maybe that way Embraer can rebalance its finances, as there is still the small matter of the 3.8 Billion Dollars fine for corruption. Their position isn’t the strongest nor the most desirable. While the civilian part seems healthy in terms of sales, the military division still needs to grow quite a bit. Everything takes time, so keep your head low and your nose to the ground, and maybe Embraer will become the defence company it’s trying to become.

BEAST MODE activated....

Self dependency, It melts in your mouth. . . (Sweet)

Way too iffy

Qantas has never had or seemed interested in the B777 of any variant its has taken delivery of its last B787 and its only planes on order are all Airbus from the A220 up to the A350

Nah, they won't make any impact as long as FAA and EASA don't issue any type certification for them, and they should do that not just for the sake of prevent accidents happened, but to ensure they never stand any chances of threatening us.

The C-919 already has the Most Reliable Performance in China as well as the Rest of Asia and Boeing has a History of Disastrous Incidents Surely and Steadily Un paralleld by any other Builder............That is why we see a Steady Shift from Boeing and Mcdonnell Douglas to Air Bus and Comac..........It is Literally comparing a Chevy with Honda and Mercedes.............Mass Production always Leaves out Quality Under the Bus........Selah

QANTAS has 24 A350-1000 on order. QANTAS has used Rolls Royce jet engines for decades !..

russia patriotism vs american hegemony😂😂😂😂

The Boeing airplane Company is in real trouble if they don`t fix all B 777X issues, and if all this stuff delays Type FAA Certification, turn off lights, and forget about it, because watching Quantas shift to Airbus A 350-1000 for very long haul schedules, it just a brief time to see Emirates following them, something that would be a hard strike to Boeing, so hard to recover in short term. The glory days of Renton factory are long, long gone.

typical russian propaganda BS

1

China this, China that, I need to set the record straight! China have faked both their ancient and modern history, their achievements, discoveries and inventions in order appear clever on the world stage. China did not invent nuclear weapons, battle tanks, howitzers, machine guns, fighter jets, helicopters, missiles and rockets, submarines, aircraft carriers, locomotives, hovercraft, plastics, (which is quite ironic really) antibiotics, vaccines, radio, television, x-rays, penicillin, telephone, gunpowder, (China had incendiaries but not explosives) to make gunpowder you need saltpetre which the Chinese did not have until it was brought in by western traders, refrigerator, electricity, light bulb, steam engine, hang glider, hot air balloon, zipper, automobile, pushbike, scooter, motorbike, computer, clock, internet, GPS, semi-conductors, printing press, paper, (Egypt invented paper, papyrus' where the word paper comes from) magnifying glass, ball-point pen, etc.etc.etc.…..as a matter of fact, China have contributed very little to society. Imagine if it were not for the west to steal technology from, the communist clowns would be still grunting on all fours.

I wanna start my own airline company with C919 and C929 jets 😮

Looks like China might have a hard time getting more planes off the ground-literally. The Comac C919, their supposed pride and joy, relies heavily on American and other international components. Let’s see how that works out when tariffs and sanctions come into play. Here’s what’s actually keeping the C919 flying:** Engines: The C919 runs on CFM International LEAP-1C engines, a joint venture between General Electric (U.S.) and Safran (France). No engines? No plane. Avionics: Critical flight control and navigation systems? Those are courtesy of Honeywell (U.S.). Landing Gear: Provided by Liebherr (Germany/France). Electrical Systems: Powered by components from Eaton (U.S.) and others. Flight Control Actuators: Made by Moog (U.S.), because stable flight isn’t optional. Cockpit Displays: Designed by Rockwell Collins (U.S.), now part of Raytheon. Safety Systems: Fuel and hydraulic systems? That’s Parker Aerospace (U.S.). So, if China’s trying to break free from Western influence, they might want to start by, you know, actually building the plane themselves. But hey, maybe their 'engineers' are too busy reverse-engineering the parts they’ve already got. Add a few tariffs and sanctions to the mix, and good luck getting any more C919s in the air.

7:57 a whole city ? Thousands of houshold ? , you mean 50-100 thousands ? Or more ?

FF to last two minutes