1792 Small Batch Review | The Bourbon Guild Review Show

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • In this episode we review 1792 Small Batch. Watch and find out what we think of it!
    Check us out on facebook: / thebourbonguild
    Check us out on Instagram (@bourbon_guild):
    / bourbon_guild
    email us: info@bourbonguild.com
    Background photo by Yann Maignan on Unsplash

КОМЕНТАРІ • 87

  • @drinkingaustin2313
    @drinkingaustin2313 5 років тому +9

    Merch! Congrats dudes!

  • @zen5528
    @zen5528 2 роки тому +1

    I love it 4 guys having a good time reviewing bourbon 🥃 great review guys cheers!

  • @billscott6819
    @billscott6819 2 роки тому

    The group reviews are great. Cheers!

  • @nathantuck2257
    @nathantuck2257 2 роки тому

    Just bought this and wanted to watch a review. Seems like you'd be fun to hang out with. New subscriber!

  • @shekatagani
    @shekatagani 6 місяців тому +1

    I've had a few bottles of this and I like it!
    I also like JD Gentleman Jack, WT 101 and Knob Creek 9 Bourbons

  • @fturla
    @fturla 2 роки тому +1

    This bourbon secretly goes on sale around my area, but most places price it at almost 40 dollars. At the regular retail price, it has a lot of competition and you would rate it at around a score of 6. If the bourbon drops well below 20 bucks, then there's nothing around that can touch it in terms of quality and the character profile of the drink and the score should jump to almost an 8. It's definitely more of a drink you should drink neat, but from what I understand, this product is a standard the distillery sells which means its at that border for mixing or drinking it neat.

  • @oza8578
    @oza8578 4 роки тому +14

    I really like this small batch 1792. Good stuff!

  • @Bossanovawitcha
    @Bossanovawitcha 3 роки тому +3

    Never know what kind of batch are going to get but I think this thing is great value. Value deserves WAY more than a point. One of the great spicy dailies.

  • @brmicmatthews8398
    @brmicmatthews8398 2 роки тому

    One of my favorite everyday pours

  • @Mose2305
    @Mose2305 5 років тому +11

    Have to say this was a very helpful review gentlemen, the 1792 Small Batch has been on my radar but one person says it sucks and another it's the best thing since slice bread, your heated but logical discussion has helped me finally pull the trigger and give it a try. Cheers to the best bourbon in your glass!

    • @danielbeavers8701
      @danielbeavers8701 4 роки тому

      It's trash! It taste like raw whiskey with woodchips added. Just go look up the reviews. I have been buying different whiskey to try. I have instant regret . It's not good

  • @edvas625
    @edvas625 5 років тому +9

    Just received a bottle for my birthday today (June 25)from my son.

    • @edvas625
      @edvas625 5 років тому +1

      @@TheMidnightLibrary Yes I did thanks

  • @jamesnorwood4084
    @jamesnorwood4084 3 роки тому

    Is the bottle made of Irish crystal? Waterford? + juice inside for $25 bucks ...Wow!

  • @philipadams3325
    @philipadams3325 4 роки тому

    I like this whiskey for fat washing with smoked bacon for maple bacon old fashioneds.

  • @BrewCityRider
    @BrewCityRider 3 роки тому +1

    Finally pulled the trigger on a bottle of small batch. Wow, nose is all over the place! I don't get anything any of you are nosing haha...I get a boatload of maple syrup and vanilla. Love the 1792.

  • @BenGates101
    @BenGates101 7 місяців тому

    Love 1792 small batch

  • @treytison1444
    @treytison1444 4 роки тому

    The third guy is right, this is not a harsh spice bourbon lol. This is a very sweet and woody bourbon. It's funny that they debate what the fruit flavor is though because I find it hard to define too. I lean towards apple or faintly cherry.

  • @wagner31415
    @wagner31415 5 років тому +3

    I just finished my bottle of 1792 and while I like it, I picked up some Elijah Craig Small Batch this time. Lately that has been hitting the spot for me and it runs the same price. I will have try these two blind before I can say for sure which I prefer.

    • @UKSportsFan
      @UKSportsFan 4 роки тому

      Excellent choices.
      It's ironic that you mentioned both 1792 SB and Elijah Craig SB since these are my two go-to every day sipper type bourbons. I have other higher end stuff as well, but I conserve those a bit more due to price. But for a dumb reach on a more consistent basis these are my current two.

  • @thomasdantas
    @thomasdantas 5 років тому +3

    This one is the definition of a 1 for value. Agreed. What would folks rate the value of the full proof offering? Is it proportionally as delicious with the amount more expensive?

  • @the.mr.beacher
    @the.mr.beacher 3 роки тому

    Finally someone else called out the cinnamon!

  • @damondecker7986
    @damondecker7986 4 роки тому +1

    First video of yours I have seen and first time trying the same bourbon. Great review and awesome bourbon hunter t-shirt. Now a subscriber! Awesome job!

  • @bigzach322
    @bigzach322 5 років тому +2

    The mash bill I've seen on most review sites recently is 75 corn / 15 rye / 10 malted barley for descriptions of the Small Batch and Single Barrel versions. I actually bought both at the same time a couple of months ago, right around the time when you did this review so they might've been the same batch. I was disappointed with the Small Batch, I thought it tasted hotter than it should from the alcohol or oak, and wasn't very complex. Cherry oak is the dominant profile for me with a small hint of artificial banana. I agree with Dutch and Jules, the nose was too much burn and that factored into the taste heavily.
    On the other hand, the Single Barrel was multitudes better with mellower oak on the palate and bigger fruit cake and artificial banana notes. I'd love to see a review of it soon! Although who knows what barrel you will get since they are one of many distilleries that do not print the barrel # or year on the bottle. When you see an affordable brand like Evan Williams Single Barrel print the exact dates for casking and bottling, it makes you wonder why these other companies don't do it.

  • @djbeacon6895
    @djbeacon6895 5 років тому +5

    Enjoyed all the heated discussions. I guess the Full proof and Sweet Wheat would be interesting! Thanks.

  • @TheGabrielberki
    @TheGabrielberki 5 років тому +2

    They also do a bottled in bond offering.

  • @marcobaraco3000
    @marcobaraco3000 5 років тому +10

    1792 is a Legit Whiskey, it's delicious, more for me, lol

  • @the.mr.beacher
    @the.mr.beacher 3 роки тому

    Drinkablity category should be heavier weighted

  • @pressman1788
    @pressman1788 5 років тому +4

    Great review fellas! I recently grabbed a 1792 full proof but haven’t cracked it. Sounds like a good pour for the money but I am a fan of OGD Bonded and WT 101 for a similar price. Grabbing something new to drink is always interesting! Cheers! 🥃👍

    • @jamesbullard4897
      @jamesbullard4897 2 роки тому

      It one I never let it run out it’s delicious

  • @socoblue1988
    @socoblue1988 5 років тому +1

    I'm not as experienced as you guys are with bourbon tasting yet, but for the value, I think this is a great pick. Just killed my first bottle of it and will probably pick up another soon- or try to find the full proof or single barrel variations of it if I can. Cheers!

  • @ap40
    @ap40 5 років тому +4

    Who else wants to just see a mash up intros and outtakes?? And can Dutch do a whole show with that higher pitch voice he uses for the intros please??

  • @notasleanstillasmean3593
    @notasleanstillasmean3593 3 роки тому

    Subbed, great back and forth!

  • @BenGates101
    @BenGates101 7 місяців тому

    In Delaware it’s $36 . Unreal

  • @jrc480
    @jrc480 5 років тому +1

    It is really cool to pour a drink and enjoy it while you are reviewing it.

  • @jordanbenoit8222
    @jordanbenoit8222 4 роки тому

    Do you not make videos anymore? Love the channel

  • @jefflicciardello1583
    @jefflicciardello1583 5 років тому +1

    We get a lot of 1792 store picks in my area. They are much better than the standard offering and usually for the same price.

  • @JackOfAllBladesCh
    @JackOfAllBladesCh 5 років тому +4

    Need to do the 1792 Barrel Proof, much better

  • @brendanwalkley5494
    @brendanwalkley5494 5 років тому +1

    I watch this channel regularly from Australia and love the reviews.
    I have always wanted to grab a bottle of this but the price here is more than regular Blantons so I usually grab that instead.

    • @FightinIrish0202
      @FightinIrish0202 5 років тому +2

      Shit, I'll buy 2 bottles of 1792 and ship to Aus if you're willing to buy 1 bottle of Blanton's and ship to US...

  • @christopherm.2413
    @christopherm.2413 3 роки тому

    1792 Small Batch beat out my Four Roses Small Batch by far.

  • @rogerloh5131
    @rogerloh5131 4 роки тому

    Enjoy this bourbon very much.Thanks n cheers

  • @2roosterz-314
    @2roosterz-314 5 років тому +1

    I have to give that one a try I got the 1792 from Costco it was an exclusive small batch and I must say it tasted more like scotch and bourbon

  • @clarkwikoff4309
    @clarkwikoff4309 5 років тому +1

    Love you guys. The 1792 Single Barrel or Full Proof are much more interesting bottles.
    Enjoy both greatly. Both are tremendous bourbs for the buck. Probably the best in burbland.
    The small batch, like many bourbons is under proofed and feels lacking.

  • @trivedi85
    @trivedi85 5 років тому +1

    Great stuff guys! On a side note I randomly stumbled upon Ben Richards the Boucher of Bakersfield while watching the Running Man!! Haha never knew 👌🏻🥃🥃

  • @bossman2924
    @bossman2924 5 років тому +1

    Interesting you guys picked up so much spice. All I got was sweetness in my bottle. It was actually too sweet. I didn't really enjoy it. The Full Proof store pick that I have is much more my speed.

  • @dianepracy2754
    @dianepracy2754 4 роки тому

    That $25 whisky costs $88 over here in Oz. Damn I hate import duty.

  • @dupermang
    @dupermang 4 роки тому

    I just got a bottle for $34.19 including taxes in Chicago. I agree, the complexity changes with every sip, it's kinda hard to nail down the flavor profile. The aroma is nice and fruity. I would say its worth the price, you won't be bummed. It does pack a hella punch for sure! Its not my absolute fav. I'm still looking for my absolute fav, I will find you one day my friend!

  • @billyray1234
    @billyray1234 5 років тому

    Best bourbon review show, believe in Jules scores. can’t all be 7.5+ . Do you have list of your 8 or above so I can start shopping.

  • @TastyFools
    @TastyFools 5 років тому +1

    been waiting for this

  • @itsupport191
    @itsupport191 4 роки тому

    give it 10, if not for flavor or uniqueness, give it for drink-ability, very smooth bourbon to enjoy for sipping neat

  • @jamesbullard4897
    @jamesbullard4897 2 роки тому

    If you guys paid 50$ for this you’d be like oh this is glorious

  • @PacesIII
    @PacesIII 4 роки тому

    Weird: The single barrel small batch says on the back it's a blend. If it's a blend, how can it be single barrel?

  • @ap40
    @ap40 5 років тому +2

    Dillon needs to work on his Jedi mind trick...

  • @joshstith3597
    @joshstith3597 9 місяців тому

    I haven't watched many of your videos but i feel like Jules standards are way to high for some of your reviews just my opinion.....

  • @littleone710
    @littleone710 5 років тому

    You have to do a taste test of Cassius Clay. It's my favorite bourbon right now! It's really good! I just found you guys and I'm addicted!!

  • @MISTAJZA
    @MISTAJZA 5 років тому

    Weird that Barton 1792 would go with 93.152525 proof or whatever, instead of going for the obvious 92 proof to fit their brand.

  • @melvinrivas3082
    @melvinrivas3082 3 роки тому

    Great drink i love it 🤜🤛

  • @johell999
    @johell999 5 років тому +1

    1792 is one of bourbon distillery I just can't get on to. Had their small batch, full proof and sweet wheat. Did not like any of them.

  • @usa5865
    @usa5865 5 років тому

    Absolutely hate the 1792 small batch. Much prefer Elijah Craig or 4 roses small batch in that price point. You guys should try wild turkey rare breed barrel proof. Its 116 proof, 40 bucks and wonderfully flavored

    • @brentparks3669
      @brentparks3669 4 роки тому

      Four Roses huh? I think I’ve heard others state that as well. I’m thinking that will be my next Bourbon purchase along with some Single Malt Scotch.

  • @whodey59
    @whodey59 5 років тому

    1792 Full Proof is SO tasty!!

  • @bretcolombo8903
    @bretcolombo8903 5 років тому +1

    I was hoping you’d get to this bourbon. It’s my all time least favorite, I found it to taste overly hot for the proof like a dodgy bottom shelfer you could swear was half rubbing alcohol. The nose had a rich and heavy scent of wet dog and the finish made me wish that it was forgettable but that essence of bile lingers in my mind. To Sazeracs credit they were wonderful about refunding the bottle which I genuinely thought was contaminated. They did lab tests and told me that it was within their batch to batch tolerance range. Glad you all had a better experience but thank you Jules for keeping the score reasonable.

  • @Stringman1950
    @Stringman1950 5 років тому

    Yum!

  • @bludevmike
    @bludevmike 4 роки тому

    *Ridgemont Reserve

  • @troybattle
    @troybattle 5 років тому

    Can you PLEASE review the 1792 single barrel? It reminds me of Blanton’s.

  • @athenassigil5820
    @athenassigil5820 4 роки тому

    I love thus stuff! But to be honest......there's no one here.....sadly....anyways, yummy, inexpensive bourbon. Bye, ya phleming bourbonites!

  • @robertpollard7667
    @robertpollard7667 4 роки тому

    you guys are jerks (I mean that in a good way! lol)! Now I have to go visit their distillery! great review fellas.

  • @G3ekbox
    @G3ekbox 5 років тому +2

    It always drinks too hot for my liking

    • @onggia850
      @onggia850 5 років тому

      Same here . It loses lots of appeal when alcohol is the only finish.

  • @jamesbullard4897
    @jamesbullard4897 2 роки тому

    Pretty negative

  • @marcobaraco3000
    @marcobaraco3000 5 років тому +1

    Try strawberry shake!

  • @jakegibson424
    @jakegibson424 5 років тому

    *Commonwealth-hood lol

  • @thedisconnectedwife4165
    @thedisconnectedwife4165 5 років тому

    Lol, tasting is so subjective. You guys are all over the place

  • @johnk7093
    @johnk7093 4 роки тому

    Ben is still annoying... I watch for the other 3...

  • @wsdejong
    @wsdejong 5 років тому

    Does Ben know what "astute" means? Every time he addresses us, the viewers, he uses "astute viewers", then proceeds to tell us something. If we were astute, we'd already know that's bullying. You wouldn't have to tell us.

    • @UKSportsFan
      @UKSportsFan 4 роки тому

      astute
      /əˈst(y)o͞ot/
      adjective
      having or showing an ability to accurately assess situations or people and turn this to one's advantage.
      How is him "telling us something" contradicting use of the term "astute"? Being astute basically means that you are intelligent enough to figure out the meaning behind what he is saying (or, "telling us")

  • @josephlepage2874
    @josephlepage2874 5 років тому

    This stuff is bad. Like, really bad. Dillon, I'm not mad, but I am disappointed in you.