Air Force One - Past Present And Future Of The President's Private Plane - Animated 3D Documentary

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 сер 2024
  • Air Force One plays a critical role in transporting the president and his staff across the world, and over the years, the aircraft has evolved to match the ever-expanding world leadership role with new livery and new aircraft.
    Today we will look at Air Force One's humble beginning, its modern implementation, and what future aircraft are under consideration to fly the commander in chief.
    0:00 - Intro
    0:41 - Humble Beginnings
    1:13 - World War Two
    1:44 - First Plane
    2:16 - First Air Force One Jet
    3:38 - Boeing 747 Upgrade
    4:55 - Future Of Air Force One
    6:38 - Supersonic President
    Our Air Force One story began in 1933 with the Douglas Dolphin, an amphibious plane owned by the US navy and designated the RD-2. It was fitted with Luxury upholstery for four passengers and a small separate sleeping compartment. While it only had a range of 601 nautical miles (1,114 km) alas, there are no reports that any president actually flew in the plane between 1933 and 1939.
    When world war two broke out, the presidential transport was upgraded to the Boeing 314, a pan am operated flying boat called the Dixie Clipper. It flew then-president Franklin D. Roosevelt from Washington to Casablanca, Morroco over the Atlantic on a journey over 5,500 miles (8,890 km) in three legs due to U-boats' genuine threat in the deep Atlantic during the war.
    While other military aircraft were used in the years following, the first aircraft to actually hold the name Air Force One was a Lockheed VC-121A-LO Constellation nicknamed Columbine II. It could fly to a range of 4,700 nautical miles (8,700 km), It was used from 1962 by President Eisenhower to the beginning of the jet age.
    In 1959, three specially built Boeing 707-120 jet aircraft-VC-137s Stratoliners were added to the airforce VIP transport fleet. The VC-137s were powerful additions, flying 7,610 miles (12,247 km), could carry up to 22 VIP passengers, and act as a flying command post. They could fly twice as far in the same time as the previous Lockheed Constellations.
    This three original 707s operated for president until 1962 with the purchase of the first true presidential jet. A custom made Boeing C-137 Stratoliner called SAM26000 was built for $8 million. This was also the first one actually to have the famous baby blue presidential color.
    SAM 26000 would be used from 1962 to 1998.
    In 1985, the USAF issued a Request For Proposal for two wide-body aircraft with a minimum of three engines and an unrefueled range of 6,000 miles (9,700 km). Boeing entered the contest with its 747 and McDonnell Douglas with the DC-10, ordering two 747s to replace the aging 707s in use. The Boeing 747, VC-25A, would be formatted to carry 26 crew members and 76 VIP passengers - including the president and all their staff to a range of 6,800 nautical miles (12,600 km). This is no ordinary Boeing 747 however, it has been formatted to survive EMP attacks and act as a flying center of government.
    Two such Boeing 747 Air Force Ones have been constructed at the cost of $325 million each.
    From here, The Air Force has been considering several options for the next generation of Air Force One aircraft. At the time, the government wasn't opposed to looking overseas to Airbus with its Airbus A380 platform, which has about 40 percent more interior space than the 747. Although politics would have prevented anyone but American manufacture.
    Another hot contender on the table was the Boeing 777X. It would have a range of 11,645 nautical miles (21566.54 km) enough to fly almost anywhere in the world.
    In 2016, proposals to build a new aircraft from scratch were rejected thanks to the enormous cost, and a new plan to retrofit two 747-8 Intercontinental that were never delivered to a Russian airline, were put on the table. With a few modifications of the layout and EMP protection, these planes can replace the current Boeing 747s and begin a new presidential transport generation.
    The 747-8 will have a minimum range of 7,730 nmi (14,320 km), although likely a lot more thanks to the smaller passenger capacity of around 100 VIP travelers and extra fuel tanks.
    But the story doesn't end here though. THe airforce is also looking beyond the next generation into a supersonic future. They have proposed three different firms Exosonic, Hermes, and Boom to build a supersonic air force one that can transport the president across the country in a matter of minutes, not hours. Boom Supersonic, the current leader in the supersonic race with the only existing prototype, would develop a 30 seater VIP supersonic aircraft that can fly a range of 4,500 nautical miles (8,300 km) at a speed of mach Mach 2.2.
    Although at this point, you start to wonder if the Air Force has considered other proposals like the Elon Musks spaceship earth that can reportably reach anywhere in the world in 45 minutes, although perhaps even that is a bit too far fetched for even the most powerful job in the world.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 694

  • @FoundAndExplained
    @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому +397

    Two mistakes:
    - I say 2600 when I mean 26000 :)
    - The 707 Air Force One operated UNTIL 2001, but the 747s entered service in 1990s. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear :)

    • @HADJEE
      @HADJEE 3 роки тому +5

      And, you say twenty-seven hundred when you mean twenty-seven thousand.

    • @cherrymaedarlinecirunay5816
      @cherrymaedarlinecirunay5816 3 роки тому +2

      And its not just the range the speed at the Concorde like part

    • @levimohr3196
      @levimohr3196 3 роки тому +8

      You were not “not clear” you were flat out wrong. Double check your information and edit your video before posting.

    • @compdude100
      @compdude100 3 роки тому +7

      Also you said that the Lockheed Constellation was introduced in 1962. Pretty sure you meant 1952.

    • @kadenzheng9159
      @kadenzheng9159 3 роки тому

      8:10 You Said The Vc-137 Was Built For 8 Doller

  • @toastysalmen4642
    @toastysalmen4642 3 роки тому +142

    I had the chance to visit Wright Patterson Air Force Base where many of these are stored, the planes are gorgeous and have been preserved in distinct honor.

    • @anir2286
      @anir2286 2 роки тому

      Lucky Person.

    • @anir2286
      @anir2286 2 роки тому

      Alien Hunters would say did you manage to get sneak peak at Hangar 18.

    • @Chevelled
      @Chevelled 2 роки тому

      I swear I love going there I’ve gone there many times and every time there’s something new it’s amazing if you love aircraft just go to this place like it’s an amazing place free entry has food hundreds planes and yeah it’s pretty cool some old Air Force ones I swear it’s gonna be so cool when they had the 747 into the fleet retired aircraft the nearest put it in right part that would be cool

    • @samypons3185
      @samypons3185 2 роки тому

      oh lucky

    • @gregbarhorst3986
      @gregbarhorst3986 2 роки тому

      Live 20 miles from there best Museum for aircraft in the world!

  • @Alvi410
    @Alvi410 3 роки тому +359

    Since many do not seem to know this: Air Force One is military callsign. An Air Force plane gets called that only when the president is on board, and only air force. Respectively the Marines provide helicopter transport for the president and the helicopter with the president on board gets the callsign Marine One.
    If the President were to fly on a Navy Plane or chopper it would be Navy One(like when bush flew in onto a carrier). An army chopper would become Army One. A civilian craft would be Executive One.

    • @JustANervousWreck
      @JustANervousWreck 3 роки тому +5

      I didn’t know there were Navy Ones and Army Ones. What about Coast Gaurd Ones? Do you think there will be a Space Force One?

    • @Alvi410
      @Alvi410 3 роки тому +15

      @@JustANervousWreck
      Yes the Navy One was a one time plane, an S-3 Viking, that Bush used to reach the carrier from wich he made the "Mission Accomplished" Speech.
      Army One was used by helicopters used to transfer the president before the Marines got complete management of the presidential choppers over the army.
      Regarding Coast Guard One or Space Force One. While a Coast Guard One never happened there was a Coast Guard Two that carried the then Vice President Joe Biden to survey flooding around Atlanta. Space Force, when it gets its own aircraft for internal logistics, will probably follow with what is a tradition in the case they were to carry the president or, more likely due to more lax security, the vice president around.

    • @jfwfreo
      @jfwfreo 3 роки тому +10

      There was even an "Executive One" when Nixon flew one flight on United Airlines (on a DC-10) back in 1973 (the height of the gas crisis and a time when the president wanted to show that he cared about the people or something)

    • @lopantolulu
      @lopantolulu 3 роки тому +11

      Might I add that wherever the US president drops a deuce within a federal building is immediately designated the callsign Crapper One. As opposed to within a civilian building which would be designated Shythole One, as many dont seem to know this of course.

    • @bagelbob3979
      @bagelbob3979 3 роки тому

      well for the army chopper a cool fact is that the amry and marines switched who would fly the helicopter but later the army got booted from that

  • @cmk353
    @cmk353 3 роки тому +54

    Can't wait to see SpaceX's interplanetary transport Air Force one

    • @dawsonowens1207
      @dawsonowens1207 3 роки тому +13

      Then it would be a space force one

    • @gerardanderson9665
      @gerardanderson9665 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah try putting the most powerfull man/women in the world on an Rocket

    • @Chevelled
      @Chevelled 2 роки тому

      Not to ruin anything but it probably won’t happen it’s just too expensive but it would be cool though

    • @cmk353
      @cmk353 2 роки тому

      @@Chevelled Nah it will be cheap in about 10years but depending on the age of the President it might not be comfortable or safe at 5-10G's

    • @Chevelled
      @Chevelled 2 роки тому

      @@cmk353 actually yeah you’re right by the course of SpaceX how much it’s evolving right now it would seem feasible but in theory you would be a lot more expensive including gas towers landing pads maybe though supersonic travel is in development right now and there’s plenty a runaways but still would be cool

  • @riliryrimaddyvia9630
    @riliryrimaddyvia9630 3 роки тому +199

    I love the animations which probably took some time so keep the works up with the enjoyable content.

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому +38

      Yes! Took me at least two days to do them all! It was very exhausting but I love the possibilities with 3D animation :)

    • @danielmeador1991
      @danielmeador1991 3 роки тому +3

      @@FoundAndExplained well they were incredible

    • @connorstohl6050
      @connorstohl6050 3 роки тому +2

      @@FoundAndExplained THey were great, but at 5:44 you put L.A. too far north on the map.

    • @keagannelka5137
      @keagannelka5137 3 роки тому +3

      @@FoundAndExplained TWO DAYS ? that was quick

  • @jacobbaird9361
    @jacobbaird9361 3 роки тому +216

    Imagine how many Presidents we would've lost if they ended up using DC10s instead of the 747

    • @dominicfrigo7397
      @dominicfrigo7397 3 роки тому +16

      dc10 ain't that bad

    • @jacobbaird9361
      @jacobbaird9361 3 роки тому +24

      @@dominicfrigo7397 Uh compared to the L1011 its a deathtrap.

    • @Kanseal
      @Kanseal 3 роки тому +7

      Hahahhahahha you killed me 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 you are right, mcdonnell douglas were shitty plain as well as new boeings

    • @Kanseal
      @Kanseal 3 роки тому +5

      @@justin.w.06 honestly, if the dc’s aren’t are thing anymore it’s because of their poor conceptions and reliability

    • @justin.w.06
      @justin.w.06 3 роки тому +6

      @@Kanseal there arent anymore trijets (727, L1011, DC-10, etc) because twin engine jets are cheaper.

  • @minimalist...6203
    @minimalist...6203 3 роки тому +29

    I must say, the Boeing-707s are always sleek and beautiful, and my second favorite being the Vice Presidents 757 today.

    • @geley5285
      @geley5285 3 роки тому +1

      They must use the 757 for Space Force, its rather quick

    • @davidhoffman1278
      @davidhoffman1278 3 роки тому

      The VC-32's paint schemes are nice.

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 3 роки тому +1

      its not the VPs aircraft, there are four C-32s used by Cabinet Level Officials

  • @snoozeCTRL
    @snoozeCTRL 3 роки тому +7

    I hope 46 axes the new livery

  • @thetreblerebel
    @thetreblerebel 3 роки тому +5

    It's cool that all aircraft basically came from a maritime origin. That's why pilots for airlines wear a nautical uniform, I think it was Pan Am that originated that. Flying boats being a pivotal part of early commercial aviation

  • @davidhickok3525
    @davidhickok3525 3 роки тому +16

    I’m pretty sure the current VC-25A was put into use in 1991/92 not 2001.

  • @px1_
    @px1_ 2 роки тому +15

    Let me say this, your 3d animation skills have evolved incredibly. Genuinly it began with blocky messes (no offense) to something that could pass as real life footage. So much so that you inspired me to download blender and get cracking.

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  2 роки тому +3

      In the last year I have really come so far! I really have been trying to learn and do more, to try and make the very best videos I can :)

  • @riliryrimaddyvia9630
    @riliryrimaddyvia9630 3 роки тому +64

    Interesting topic,maybe you could do Russia's/soviet Unions history of presidential planes ?

  • @jettack531
    @jettack531 3 роки тому +20

    Just use the 747-8 Intercontenental man, its the original Queen Of The Skies.

    • @oaktreeyt6488
      @oaktreeyt6488 3 роки тому +4

      you mean the *president* of the skies?

    • @lucasdevries5131
      @lucasdevries5131 2 роки тому +2

      @@oaktreeyt6488 If its called the queen of the skies its immortal and cant be shot down. This is a very strategic decision.

  • @daren9938
    @daren9938 3 роки тому +9

    When you said that there was going to be a supersonic jet proposed i was like, "Ahh you want fast maybe SpaceX, Space force One?" few seconds later, "Ahh I see you were one step ahead."

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому +4

      As soon as Space X spaceship earth works... why would they fly slowly?

  • @andresguerra5748
    @andresguerra5748 3 роки тому +3

    Min 2:15 (mistake), the VC-121 Constellation "Columbine II" wouldn't be used by President Eisenhower in 1962, because he was president from 1953 to 1961. I think you mean 1952 when it was used by president-elect Eisenhower. Not a big thing, but maybe you must double check before publishing.

  • @ericgirardet1848
    @ericgirardet1848 3 роки тому +59

    The next administration should order the plane to be delivered with the old paint scheme.

    • @RichO1701e
      @RichO1701e 3 роки тому +12

      The Trump paint scheme is godawful

    • @GopherBaroque61
      @GopherBaroque61 3 роки тому +4

      @@RichO1701e Agreed. It's way too similar to his failed airline's livery. Of course, it's Trump... so, let's throw out 60 years of history. What an ass.

    • @tjdarkrage6693
      @tjdarkrage6693 2 роки тому +1

      Just because you don't like Republican red, doesn't mean it shouldn't be represented on the President's plane. What, you want to take the red stripes out of the flag, too? Besides, Red should represent the liberal looney left progressives, who are just red communists in disguise.

    • @Buconoir
      @Buconoir 2 роки тому +3

      @@tjdarkrage6693turmp lost. He's irrelevant.

    • @tjdarkrage6693
      @tjdarkrage6693 2 роки тому +2

      @@Buconoir Keep telling yourself that. 2022 is coming.

  • @joshuagabriel660
    @joshuagabriel660 3 роки тому +4

    Oh wow it's impressive that you posted a new video so quickly after the previous one.
    It gives me something new to look forward to every couple of days or so

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому +1

      Yes! I love to make these so be sure to subscribe :) thanks for watching

  • @paulcheek5711
    @paulcheek5711 3 роки тому +5

    keep the iconic paint job

  • @gusepark3d623
    @gusepark3d623 3 роки тому +8

    When I heard of Russians undelivered 747s, It almost made me cry As I remembered Transaero😢😭 R.I.P. Transaero

    • @leventovich
      @leventovich 3 роки тому +2

      О привет, реально жалко трансаеро, не одной авиакатастрофы

  • @christalbot210
    @christalbot210 3 роки тому +2

    Considering Eisenhower wasn't president in 1962, I'm guessing you meant 1952. :-)

  • @Skirbiy
    @Skirbiy 3 роки тому +4

    Queen of the skies absolute masterpiece perfect!

  • @AirlinerHistory
    @AirlinerHistory 5 місяців тому

    A great video, and it confirms some things for a future video I am putting out shortly on my own channel. Thank you

  • @falcon9xx
    @falcon9xx 2 роки тому

    Super informative. Thank you.

  • @syedarooshahmed1554
    @syedarooshahmed1554 3 роки тому

    Awesome video thanks for sharing

  • @IceeAviation
    @IceeAviation 2 роки тому

    Very informative ...thank you

  • @sigdeldiwon
    @sigdeldiwon 3 роки тому +1

    Love your contents Nick!!

  • @daanbos5918
    @daanbos5918 3 роки тому +21

    Air Force one will probably the last 2 747’s in service

    • @ericgu9036
      @ericgu9036 3 роки тому +1

      @ANTON KOSS in total. 747s are being retired at a rapid ratw

    • @chrisgeimke1371
      @chrisgeimke1371 3 роки тому

      Virgin galactic saved one 747 I believe. A few weeks ago they launched a rocket from one at high altitude

    • @scarecrow108productions7
      @scarecrow108productions7 3 роки тому

      @@chrisgeimke1371 yep. Reg. G-VROC. That's the one.

    • @58HUSTLER
      @58HUSTLER 3 роки тому +1

      That is a really interesting point, isn't it? Freighter versions of the airplane will still be around and in use, probably by second tier cargo haulers when companies like UPS have retired their fleet of the new 47F. So yeah, the two Air Force One aircraft will likely be the last to regularly fly people around. Considering the two current 200 models have been around for 30 years (and are among very few 200 models still in the air), it's certainly conceivable that the two new planes, supposedly to take to the skies in 2024, will be around until at least 2050, when Lufthansa, Korean Air and Air China will have long retired their fleets of the 47-i.

  • @chevalvivant
    @chevalvivant 3 роки тому +2

    Recognized around the world, an American icon. The former President wanted the color scheme to look like part of his now defunct jet and helicopter colors., putting his brand on the jet.

  • @daribbil
    @daribbil 3 роки тому

    Thank you for the history lesson

  • @DJ-uy8qp
    @DJ-uy8qp 3 роки тому

    Awesome video!

  • @dennisswaney644
    @dennisswaney644 3 роки тому +2

    The map showing Roosevelt's route to Casablanca is extremely wrong! The Boeing 314 "Dixie Clipper" (technically an USN C-143) route was from Miami, Florida to Trinidad to Belém, Brazil to Bathurst, Gambia (now Banjul, The Gambia). At Bathurst, he changed to an USAAF C-54 (ex TWA DC-4) for the flight to Casablanca. The return route was the same except for a stop at Monrovia, Liberia on the Casablanca - Bathurst leg.

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the correction. At the time of editing I couldn't find the route by the aircraft.

  • @camf7522
    @camf7522 3 роки тому +2

    At least the new, yet out of production, B747-8 Presidential Flight will now be able be painted in its traditional colours.

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому

      I wonder if they will change it

    • @camf7522
      @camf7522 3 роки тому

      @@FoundAndExplained ..I would,, trading is a good thing sometimes.

  • @PaulStewartAviation
    @PaulStewartAviation 3 роки тому +2

    A fascinating video!

  • @Kaidhicksii
    @Kaidhicksii 3 роки тому +9

    Yeah I've been following Boom for a while now: if their Overture actually does get picked, that'd be quite the fairy tale story with a start-up company emerging as the presidential carrier in a post-pandemic world. The A380 I think is safe to rule out for the reason you just gave, though it is a very interesting concept and would keep the plane in the air for a little longer. And the 777x with its range & efficiency probably makes the most sense, but I really hope the 747-8 is picked to continue the jumbo jet legacy as Air Force One. :)

    • @nikobelic4251
      @nikobelic4251 3 роки тому +2

      The 777-X is not an option according to current requirements. One of them being at least 3 engines. That’s why the first purpose built AF-1 had at least 3 engines.

    • @almerindaromeira8352
      @almerindaromeira8352 3 роки тому

      In this digital world there is no need for supersonic. Even for normal business people. If you bring your phone and laptop your productivity doesn't take a hit. Supersonic is only for enthusiasts. Why should the president ride on a private jet sized dart? Is he John McCain evading enemy planes?

  • @joaquinpraveenvishnu8509
    @joaquinpraveenvishnu8509 2 роки тому

    The best content!

  • @zackakai5173
    @zackakai5173 3 роки тому +5

    Apparently during WWII, the President was transported across the Atlantic on a Japanese Zero due to threat of attack by a Soviet Typhoon class ballistic missile submarine.

  • @stradivarioushardhiantz5179
    @stradivarioushardhiantz5179 3 роки тому +12

    List of BBJ747-8i;
    1. Oman: A4O-HMS,
    2. China: B-2480
    3. Brunei: V8-BKH
    4. Morocco:CN-MBH (ex A6-PFA)
    5. Turkey: TC-TRK (ex VQ-BSK)
    6. Qatar: A7-HBJ
    7. Qatar: A7-HHE
    8. Qatar A7-HHF (ex A6-PFB)
    9. Kuwait: 9K-GAA
    10. Saudi: HZ-HMS1
    11. South Korea: HL-7643
    12. Boeing: N828BA
    The upcoming Air Force One/ VC-25B (ex Transaero):
    13. USA: N894BA (ex EI-MOW)
    14. USA: N895BA (ex EI-TSO)
    🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫
    List of ACJ350;
    1. 10+03 A350-900; German Luftwaffe "Kurt Schumacher"
    2. 10+04 A350-900; German Luftwaffe
    3. D-AKAY; K5-Aviation
    4. EC-NOI; World2Fly Spain
    🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫
    List of ACJ340-600;
    1. Azerbaijan; 4K-AI08
    2. Sky Prime; HZ-SKY
    3. Air X Charter; 9H-FFC
    🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫
    List of ACJ340-500
    1. Saudi Royal Flight; T7-SAU
    2. Qatar Amiri Flight; A7-HHH
    3. Royal Thai Air Force; HS-TYV
    4. Aeronautica Militare (Italian Air Force); I-TALY
    5. Turkey; TC-CAN (ex: TS-KRT)
    6. Algeria; 7T-VPP
    7. Kuwait; 9K-GBA
    8. Kuwait; 9K-GBB
    9. Las Vegas Sands Corporation; VP-BMS
    🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫
    List of Special 747SP;
    1. A9C-HAK; Bahrain Royal Flight (ex; A6-ZSN)
    2. VQ-BMS; Las Vegas Sands (ex; A9C-HMH)
    3. VP-BLK; Las Vegas Sands (ex; A992MS & A6-SMR)
    4. VP-BAT; CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing (ex; Worldwide Aircraft Holding)
    5. P4-FSH; Ernest Angley Ministries (ex; A6-SMM)
    6. A4O-SO; Oman Royal Flight
    7. C-FPAW, Pratt & Whitney flying testbed
    8. N747A; NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center
    9. N747NA; NASA SOFIA
    10. HZ-HM1B; Saudi Royal Flight
    11. HZ-HM1C; Saudi Royal Flight
    12. HZ-AIF; Saudi Royal Flight
    13. YI-ALM; Iraq
    14. C-GTFF; Pratt & Whitney Engine Services
    15. C-FPAW; Pratt & Whitney Engine Services
    🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫
    List of Government & Private 777;
    1. 4K-AI001 777-200LR; Azerbaijan
    2. S2-AHM 777-300ER; Bangladesh
    4. TR-KPR 777-200; Gabon
    5. VT-ALV 777-300ER; Air India One
    6. VT-ALW 777-300ER; Air India One
    7. PK-GIG 777-300ER; Indonesia Presidential Flight
    8. YI-AQZ 777-200LR; Iraq
    9. 80-1111 777-300ER; Japan Air Self Defence Force
    10. 80-1112 777-300ER; Japan Air Self Defence Force
    11. HZ-MF9 777-300ER; Saudi Arabian Government
    12. EZ-A777 777-200LR; Turkmenistan
    13. A6-ALN 777-200ER; UAE Presidential Flight (ex; VP-BRH)
    14. A6-SIL 777-300ER; UAE Presidential Flight
    15. N777UK 777-200ER; Bank Of Utah/ Access Industries
    16. VP-CAL 777-200LR; Prince Mohammed bin Fahd al Saud
    17. P4-SKN 777-200LR; Equatorial Guinea
    18. P4-XTL 777-200LR; Comlux Aruba/Crystal Skye
    19. N777AS 777-200ER; Mid-East Jet
    🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫
    List of BBJ787;
    1. A6-PFC 787-8; UAE Presidential
    2. A6-PFE 787-9; UAE Presidential
    3. A6-PFG 787-9; UAE Presidential
    4. A6-PFH 787-9; UAE Presidential
    5. P4-787 787-8; Comlux Aruba
    6. XC-MEX 787-8; Mexico
    7. N507BJ 787-8; South Korea
    8. N947BA 787-8; TVPX Trust Services
    9. HZ-MF7 787-8; Saudi Ministry of Finance & Economy
    10. HZ-MF8 787-8; Saudi Ministry of Finance & Economy
    11. 2-DEER 787-8; Royal Jet
    12. P4-BDL 787-8; Global Jet Luxembourg
    13. V8-OAS 787-8; Brunei
    14. UK001 787-8; Uzbekistan
    15. N8906W 787-9; Wilmington Trust Company
    16. N8903W 787-9; Wilmington Trust Company
    🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫🛫
    #AvGeek 🛫🤓

  • @ufo9661
    @ufo9661 3 роки тому +6

    *Note: the goverment has already signed a contract with boeing for 2 new 747/8 to replace the old ones.

    • @childish8469
      @childish8469 3 роки тому +1

      but under an executive order the president can change that. (i mean the color.)

  • @DigiCat99
    @DigiCat99 2 роки тому

    Cool!

  • @L33tSkE3t
    @L33tSkE3t 2 роки тому +2

    The Paint Scheme for the new Air Force one needs to be changed… It makes one of the most prestigious aircraft on the planet look like a budget Airline. I vote for a modernization of the current paint scheme.

  • @lonwaslien104
    @lonwaslien104 3 роки тому +161

    I hate the proposed new livery. Too commercial. Looks like old TWA and USAirways liveries.

    • @user-ot7mu7ny1k
      @user-ot7mu7ny1k 3 роки тому +26

      It’s actually modeled off of trump airlines... go figure.

    • @chuc98
      @chuc98 3 роки тому +20

      The color scheme is Trump’s idea. No doubt the colors will never happen now. Robbin’s egg blue for the bottom is meant to help blend the plane against the sky when viewing it from below so the proposed garish colors would make it a very visible target.

    • @scottyee707
      @scottyee707 3 роки тому +2

      The new one so much more aggressive and sharp, the old one looks like it belongs in a YMCA parade

    • @chuc98
      @chuc98 3 роки тому +11

      @@scottyee707 the proposed color scheme is obnoxious and makes it an obvious target in the sky. YMCA? Not sure what you’re even trying to assert with that comment.

    • @scottyee707
      @scottyee707 3 роки тому +10

      @@chuc98 target lmao, this in 2020, no one is using eyesight to take down airplanes... I know it goes over your head

  • @stevenmedlock7580
    @stevenmedlock7580 3 роки тому +1

    I liked this video very much..

  • @brianstringfellow8241
    @brianstringfellow8241 3 роки тому +2

    The current livery is very good there is a af1 that sits at natl harbour and when I approached it ..I was terrified and amazed even though the plane wasn't moving it was huge and represented the very best....leave this livery on this plane the livery represents freedom and hope for all

  • @maxant4285
    @maxant4285 3 роки тому +3

    Just in case you don't know - that was not a U-boat shown.

  • @jacobweiszberger194
    @jacobweiszberger194 2 роки тому

    Nice video

  • @DJM.I.A.
    @DJM.I.A. 3 роки тому +2

    I use to be stationed at Davis - Monthan in Arizona, which is where the boneyard is at for where decommissioned planes go to, and the old AF 1 plane was out there. I had a restricted area badge to go into the boneyard and walk right up to the plane and touch it.
    It was cool & all but the C-5s that were next to it made airforce 1 look like a Learjet

  • @jamiep61
    @jamiep61 2 роки тому

    I enjoyed watching the Video

  • @andrewlawrence2272
    @andrewlawrence2272 3 роки тому +1

    I chuckled at the use of a Russian Typhoon ballistic missile submarine to represent a German WWII U-boat. Otherwise, another excellent video. Keep up the good work but your treatment applied to military projects would be the icing on the cake.

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому +1

      It was the last shot of the day and I was like... where can I find a uboat... i KNOW it was wrong, but man sometimes you just want to get it out!

    • @andrewlawrence2272
      @andrewlawrence2272 3 роки тому

      @@FoundAndExplained Fully understand. I would be untrigued to know how many people spotted it. Do you have any intention of expanding acope to military what ifs? There is so much scope post war. Keep up the great work.

  • @generalghost9606
    @generalghost9606 3 роки тому +2

    I’m subscribed this video is good

  • @Concodroid
    @Concodroid 3 роки тому +3

    Hey, did you accidently duplicate the clipper at 0:24?

  • @kamalnathkanthimathinathan1473
    @kamalnathkanthimathinathan1473 3 роки тому

    Super sonic sounds super smooth...

  • @s4und3rs_highhms47
    @s4und3rs_highhms47 3 роки тому +1

    The Dolphin 2 probably shouldn’t be here,as there is no evidence it flew in it,but I like how deep you dug and I appreciate it

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому

      I thought it was an interesting place to start the story

  • @radudeATL
    @radudeATL 3 роки тому +81

    The current livery is perfect. Leave it be...

    • @Skirbiy
      @Skirbiy 3 роки тому +4

      Its boring 😴

    • @xzach1993
      @xzach1993 3 роки тому +2

      I Totally Agree Current Livery...Leave it ALONE!!!

    • @tylermoon9777
      @tylermoon9777 3 роки тому +1

      It is not all about the look most of it they have not told you because of security it is all about protecting the president

    • @Skirbiy
      @Skirbiy 3 роки тому +1

      @Dan Nguyen I meant the old one was boring I like the new one because it has the us flag colors.

    • @childish8469
      @childish8469 3 роки тому

      @@Skirbiy ok kid, just let the grown ups talk now. the original design under kennedy was for elegance, not the aggresive orange. america had so much military might that they didnt need to look agressive.

  • @mr.n0ne
    @mr.n0ne 3 роки тому +1

    Subscribed. Liked. Commented.👍

  • @Bob18818
    @Bob18818 3 роки тому +1

    Really interesting video

  • @courtneyksf
    @courtneyksf 3 роки тому +4

    45's livery looks identical to aeroflot

  • @cefb8923
    @cefb8923 3 роки тому +3

    5:02 A380 replacing the C5? Nope. They need to the kneeling capability to drive trucks on board. Also you can load it front front and rear.

  • @janmann33
    @janmann33 3 роки тому +2

    The 747s entered service in 1992, not 2001.

  • @sumanbasu5384
    @sumanbasu5384 3 роки тому +3

    Can u pls explain how this boeing 314 travelled from DC to Casablanca I. 3 legs? Did it refuel in mid air as those days air refueler never existed

    • @lexprontera8325
      @lexprontera8325 Рік тому

      Stop 2 seems to be the Azores.
      Stop 1 was probably a refueling ship at sea half way to the Azores, a seaplane tender of some sort. The 314 is a seaplane, so that would be my first guess.

  • @gator9520
    @gator9520 3 роки тому +2

    I’ve actually been in the 707 it was pretty cool

    • @Skirbiy
      @Skirbiy 3 роки тому +1

      Your lucky

  • @MN-lr5vg
    @MN-lr5vg 3 роки тому +9

    New livery looks interesting. But the classic livery made by french designer Loewy remains stunning

    • @andrewday3206
      @andrewday3206 3 роки тому +8

      Trump’s livery looks like a 1980’s plastic toy. It is gaudy

    • @andrewday3206
      @andrewday3206 2 роки тому

      @Hvcfghc
      That’s fine but Air Force One is an icon across the globe. There is value in tradition. Changing Air Force One is like painting new colors on the Statue of Liberty 🗽

    • @andrewday3206
      @andrewday3206 2 роки тому

      @Hvcfghc
      Then put Stilettos 👠 on the Statue of Liberty 🗽
      Air Force One is a national and worldwide icon of the United States

    • @andrewday3206
      @andrewday3206 2 роки тому

      @Hvcfghc
      Ignorance would think Air Force One is not a national icon
      Not surprising

  • @hunterleebrown
    @hunterleebrown 3 роки тому +5

    2:14 1953 maybe? Eisenhower wasn’t president in 1962 (nor in 1952)

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому

      Right, so I see where the confusion is. 1962 is when Air Force One was officially named and passed to a 707. Eisenhower was president until January 1961. Eisenhower did fly on a 707 but it had Air Force livery. Sorry I wasn't clear :)

  • @Epsilon11Fox
    @Epsilon11Fox 2 роки тому

    747-400 Military AKA VC-25 is so cool!

  • @YourOldUncleNoongah
    @YourOldUncleNoongah 3 роки тому +3

    You say SAM 2600 but the tail shows 26000???

  • @littlerambo
    @littlerambo 3 роки тому +5

    Hope UA-cam recommend your videos more often so you reach more people... Your videos are amazing!!

  • @robertorafaelvazquezvazque2376
    @robertorafaelvazquezvazque2376 3 роки тому +3

    Some "long haul" guys have been very inspired by this video

  • @markrossow6303
    @markrossow6303 3 роки тому +1

    an Eisenhower era 707 is at Boeing Museum in Seattle
    as is a Concorde (saw that one on Final final approach...

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 3 роки тому

      its a VC-135

  • @smokyblackeyes3615
    @smokyblackeyes3615 3 роки тому +3

    Kursk representing a U-boat
    *_completly accurate_*

  • @Coreyphillip7478
    @Coreyphillip7478 3 роки тому +3

    Vc 25a entered service in 1990 not 2001

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому

      Yes but the original 707s were still used till 2001 and given the name air force one when the president used them.

    • @Coreyphillip7478
      @Coreyphillip7478 3 роки тому +1

      @@FoundAndExplained alright but, the vc 25a was in service after 1990, it was said that they entered in 2001, when they entered in 1990.

  • @YourOldUncleNoongah
    @YourOldUncleNoongah 3 роки тому +2

    Love your vids mate. Hope to see em for yrs to come! MAny thanks for taking the time to produce these for us.

  • @danielupcott5439
    @danielupcott5439 3 роки тому +1

    The airbus plane actually looks really good!

  • @ajpineno9113
    @ajpineno9113 3 роки тому +2

    Btw they already bought two new 747-8i to replace the older 747s, so yeah they already made a choice

  • @beboy12003
    @beboy12003 3 роки тому

    This was good. It was very interesting that the Air force had considered the A380 as a option. I always thought that using an foreign airplane wasn't possible.

    • @johnp139
      @johnp139 3 роки тому +1

      Airbus didn’t bid so it was a moot point.

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart4172 3 роки тому +1

    Columbine II is being restored back to VC-121 configuration as we speak-the intention is to display it as a flying museum.

  • @godzillaplayz7777
    @godzillaplayz7777 3 роки тому +1

    Subbed.liked.commented

  • @riliryrimaddyvia9630
    @riliryrimaddyvia9630 3 роки тому +8

    Unlikely but maybe the 777X or the A350 should be in thought as well ,fuel prices should probably be going up in price in a few years time

    • @nikobelic4251
      @nikobelic4251 3 роки тому

      No, one of the requirements is at least 3 engines

    • @woodduck2178
      @woodduck2178 3 роки тому

      The us government won't use an airbus aircraft unless it's made in the us

    • @nikobelic4251
      @nikobelic4251 3 роки тому

      @@woodduck2178 yeah and they don’t make widebodies in the US

    • @paulcheek5711
      @paulcheek5711 3 роки тому

      airbus for an American president no way

    • @IllusiveDude
      @IllusiveDude 3 роки тому +1

      Gas prices is the least of the US governments concerns

  • @theskyline1425
    @theskyline1425 3 роки тому +2

    On one hand I love the current livery on the Air force one but on the other I find the new lively some how better.
    Your content is amazing. I'm happy I found this channel. Keep up!

  • @mo8755
    @mo8755 3 роки тому +2

    The best bit Capital L Bunkerboy won’t be riding in the new one lol hahahahaha 😂😂😂😂

  • @RhodeIslandDude
    @RhodeIslandDude 3 роки тому +2

    It’s called Sam 26 thousand and 27 thousand.
    NOT HUNDRED !!!!

  • @amjadhamraoui7061
    @amjadhamraoui7061 Рік тому

    I hope that it will be the 747-8. For me, it’s one of the best aircraft in the world

  • @cameronblair5403
    @cameronblair5403 3 роки тому +1

    needs to be a a350 in the force one fleet.I wood have the engines red. Wings blue with a American flag running nearly the full fuselage.

  • @SlawcioD
    @SlawcioD 2 роки тому

    1:38 talking about U-Boots showing Typhoon class sub ;)

  • @tulsatrash
    @tulsatrash 3 роки тому +2

    >mentions WW2 german Uboats.
    >Shows an image of a late cold war Soviet Ballistic Missile Submarine.
    Seems legit.

  • @redballthing
    @redballthing 3 роки тому +7

    damn man you deserve way more than what you have now

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks for subscribing! This was a tough video as its not just one 3d model, but there is one for every presidential plane, including the Lockheed one although it only appears very briefly.

    • @redballthing
      @redballthing 3 роки тому

      In my opinion, you done a great job!

  • @aero_park
    @aero_park 2 роки тому

    Me being an aviation fan… YES

  • @SDStudiosAnimations
    @SDStudiosAnimations 3 роки тому +3

    0:18 that plane go Z-fighting tho

  • @Chevelled
    @Chevelled 2 роки тому

    Speaking of the super sonic feature hours on a United 737 I was coming home on the screen you’re actually or building supersonic jets to add to their fleet

  • @polduseri909
    @polduseri909 3 роки тому +2

    Love the proposed livery.

  • @budaroski
    @budaroski 2 роки тому

    A space force 1 would be so cool.

  • @ayushthosar6005
    @ayushthosar6005 2 роки тому +1

    Yaay I was the ten-thousandth like

  • @LuisAWhiteNotaryServices
    @LuisAWhiteNotaryServices 3 роки тому +103

    I do not like the new color, I hope the new president keeps the old colors its classier and looks more refine, the 747-800 is in deed the best choice. USA 🇺🇸

    • @JustJohn505
      @JustJohn505 3 роки тому +20

      Totally agree, trump is trying to destroy every bit of america and I hate it

    • @loompaoompa2627
      @loompaoompa2627 3 роки тому +16

      @@JustJohn505 oh grow up

    • @JustJohn505
      @JustJohn505 3 роки тому +4

      @@loompaoompa2627 ?

    • @tazukisky
      @tazukisky 3 роки тому +8

      @@JustJohn505 don't try to make it political, this is for aeronautics, and don't blame it all for Trump, The colors isn't picked by him.

    • @JustJohn505
      @JustJohn505 3 роки тому +9

      @@tazukisky
      m.ua-cam.com/video/PzfS1n8ED10/v-deo.html
      Watch this video around 0:20 mark
      Also trump is a joke it's hard not to make it political lmao

  • @johnsymonstcu
    @johnsymonstcu 3 роки тому +2

    Well done. Quite informative and interesting.

  • @de_sh0t114
    @de_sh0t114 2 роки тому

    Damn I wish we got the dc10 it was so pretty.

  • @minitrundle
    @minitrundle 3 роки тому +2

    SAM 26 and 27 THOUSAND. 3 zeros in thousand.

  • @maxant4285
    @maxant4285 3 роки тому +4

    2:11 you meant 1952
    4:52 you meant 1991

    • @Tzvi092
      @Tzvi092 3 роки тому

      tail numbers of by a 0 as well. Otherwise, an ok piece.

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому

      1962 is when Air Force One was officially named and passed to a 707 from the Lockheed aircraft. Eisenhower was president until January 1961. Eisenhower did fly on a 707 from 1959, but it had Air Force livery. Sorry I wasn't clear :)
      707 was used till 2001.

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому

      on the 3d model?

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому

      "SAM 27000's last flight as Air Force One was on August 29, 2001 when it flew President George W. Bush from San Antonio to Waco, Texas"

    • @maxant4285
      @maxant4285 3 роки тому

      You explained nothing here, my friend. You messed up all dates.

  • @mairapasok5258
    @mairapasok5258 3 роки тому

    Wow

  • @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis
    @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis 3 роки тому +31

    Thumbnail: a380 AFO
    Patriotic Americans: it’s treason then...

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  3 роки тому +7

      Well spotted

    • @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis
      @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis 3 роки тому +1

      Eric Ferguson some people have more smug than humor... m.ua-cam.com/video/4TvTjTO2hAI/v-deo.html

    • @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis
      @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis 3 роки тому +2

      lol. I make is silly comment about the US leader not using US made planes, and then a political battle starts. I get it. rage on key board warriors, rage on.

    • @kenetickups6146
      @kenetickups6146 3 роки тому +1

      @@Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis I'm sorry for people bugging you with politics

    • @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis
      @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis 3 роки тому +2

      Kenetic Kups eh, it’s the internet, and everyone is on the edge of their seat right now.

  • @bingosunnoon9341
    @bingosunnoon9341 3 роки тому

    Eisenhower had an Aero Commander that was know as AF1 when he was aboard. Flew him to Camp David.

  • @ErnestJay88
    @ErnestJay88 3 роки тому +2

    Since A380 is made by European, we will never see A380 Air Force One

  • @Fyxles
    @Fyxles 2 роки тому

    I hope the super sonic aircraft in the future Wont hurt the environment, As concorde learned.