I just moved to Denver, and I think it's worth a "survey" of recently completed projects. Frankly, I'm really impressed with the bevy of new buildings that have changed the city's look over the last 15 years -- an art museum, a courthouse, a performing arts complex, new sports stadiums and some gorgeous mid-rise business towers. No other American city, in my opinion, has grown so fast with so much good architectural taste. Denver's decisions seem to actually care about the eyes of the people who must face the built environment every day.
That was President Trump's (then citizen Trump's) first building project - - it TRANSFORMED the area (which had turned into a seedy dumpy run-down neighborhood.) They want to take it down BECAUSE Trump built it (immature + petty cry-baby politics)
It is already hidden among taller buildings. It can't keep low density at a transit hub for landmark reasons. A shorter building or renovation is not economical. The existing building is obsolete.
This building is going to completely destroy the majesty of the Chrysler building, to the point of placing it in peril of replacement just like the Commodore. Probably in as little as 20 years.
With work from home and hybrid models having caused a huge office vacancy rate in all major cities, one wonders if there is such a need for this colossal structure. But it's the massive disrespect towards the Chrysler Building across the street which appalls me. It's as if they want to hide the most beloved skyscraper in New York. You won't be able to view the Chrysler Building anymore from any direction except the East, and even then it will have the massive Commodore building right behind it serving as a backdrop. Did you notice how many times the Chrysler Building was shown in this video, proudly towering over Grand Central and the Hyatt? Well say goodbye to those views forever. I really hope this thing never gets built, or at least not at this location.
For years the most beloved skyscraper in NYC was the Singer Building. At least the Chrysler Building isn't being demolished. If you want frozen in time stick to Colonial Williamsburg.
@@LJB103 I guess we should never have created the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission then? Grand Central Terminal and Radio City Music Hall were both on the chopping block but saved by it. Were we just wanting to be frozen in time?
@@LJB103 Or what you do is jack the Chrysler building up 751 feet and build new floor space between the existing lobby and upper portion which would be cut apart. Basically the same thing that was done to the Palace Theater just on a much grander scale. Then, you lower it onto the newly-built floor space and you have a building that goes up 1,797 feet to project commodore's 1,581. The Chrysler gets to retain its position on the skyline but for a new era.
They should’ve made this tower at least 2,000 feet high. And a bit more decorative, out of all the new tallest buildings of NYC this one is my favorite design.
the building’s beautiful no doubt, but its scale is absolutely unreasonable. the same with the new foster&partners skyscraper. why can’t we show some respect for the surrounding patrimonial architecture?? why does the chrysler building have to be so overshadowed by these new buildings?? i believe that “showing respect” to past architecture should go way beyond some slight design aspects. these new monstrous towers just don’t fit in the urban envoirement they’re going to be placed in
This tower is HUGE and feels out of place at this specific location. However, I do love the design. Overall good video but my only point of contention is the clip of the Chicago L at 5:38 passing off as MTA.
I saw the "L," too. Immediately. And I'm no NY-er...but I knew that wasn't right. Hard to imagine any video producer (or "content creator") being that sloppy and, further, presuming the audience won't know.
It is a huge tower at a time when people do not want to come in to work at the office, NYC is filled with crime, filthy rundown subway system, grimy dirty streets, litter everywhere, thugery, homelessness and drugs everywhere in pure daylight, less police to protect, and counteract crime, homicides, vandalism, etc, etc. NYC has lost its style, glam, opulence, it is nothing but a dysfunctional city that is mediocre infrastructure, police, rescue, emergency agencies, are reduced like never before. Why go ahead with this costly tiresome played out project. What is in it for the law abiding citizens that are poorer and run down, ignored, that are just trying to survive the violent, ugly jungle that NYC has become now in 2024 the 21st century.
A brief look at the situation, I see office vacancy rates in that area around one in five to one in four, so this is a situation normally new space would be difficult to support.
Visually, the tower's architecture is convincing, but its footprint is too BIG! It trivializes both Grand Central and the Chrysler building. If it just reduced its entire scale by 10 percent or even less, 8 percent, the neighboring structures could retain some dignity in their volume. This video is well-informed and narrated, but too laudatory. I love the addition of more architecture didcussions on YT, but I hope the channel aims for objective dialog, over a promotional tone.
The renderings are gorgeous. I prefer the new build to the hotel. The hotel was nothing special to look at. The new building really makes a statement. I lived in NYC for 24 years. It's an amazing place. No matter what the economy is like, the construction never seems to slow down. For people that live there, it's just a part of life.
Very American and simplistic vision of the audio commentary. The building itself is a success from the outside, its design is sober, elegant and is meant to recall the New York architecture of the last century. The real negative point is its immediate proximity to the Chrysler building. This building will definitely break the view and the atmosphere of the neighborhood I think of this iconic view at the bottom of Grand Central, with the Chrysler building. A view that visitors and tourists love! And there are still more than 60 million of them per year in the city… So it’s a shame.
This is my favorite area of New York City, and I know it extremely well. The Chrysler Building is my favorite building ever. I actually don't like this new building because of the way it looms over the Chrysler Building. But I do love the street-level/Viaduct-level aspect of the place. That is truly epic. The Hyatt Hotel has been a has-been property for 30 years now, so it is no big loss. But yeah... I do wish this new building was half the height that it is, as the Chrysler Building will all but disappear from the skyline with that monster building next to it. So thumbs down in general for this building, but at least New York is starting to get that in on that Tokyo style of making the street level and mezzanine of new buildings into walkable and accessible parkland.
Great observations. I've always considered the Chrysler Building to be NYC's most beautiful skyscraper. However, it's already been dwarfed in the neighborhood by new construction. As a native NYer, the constantly changing skyline is exciting and a further testament to the City's uniqueness.
This new skyscraper by SOM is a step in the right direction. The structural latice pays homage to the late Zaha Hadid, adding architectural interest to the skyline. I would love to see more buildings push the future envelope.
One of the most beautiful skyscrapers. Let's not forget Mies van der Rohe's buildings in NY and Chicago, the Sears Tower, John Hancock Center and the Chrysler Building. Just to name a few. But again, this is looking amazing.
The Hyatt replacement is much closer to the iconic Chrysler Building than the computer rendering eluded to. It’s going to be totally dominated by this new edition.
@@Engineering-Unveiled I like the chicago concept but I feel it should be moved into the heart of Chicago and have a transit station for bus & rail, such as a greyhound & city, subway & and amtrack. The concept of building stadiums on the outskirts of communities is a 1960s concept when there wasn't substantial infrastructure debt, as in when everything was brand new and didn't have 50 years of wear and tare. Simply put rural towns are now going back to gravel roads because they have to decide if they're going to be able to pay the teachers or have nice paved roads. My prediction is that once the taboo of not raising federal gas taxes since 1993 has been breached, Gas prices will quickly double and then triple decades later from current price, that's an issue when people have a nuclear melt down over gas prices going up 20 cents a gallon. Then there's the mental ruinous aspect of car dependency. Kids are esentially trapped in their backyard until they turn 18 as it's impractical to ask 5 freinds to all each walk 2 hours(1 hour of walking one way) to meet up. By moving stadiums into communities you could then offer youth passes for local students to get them out of their houses to watch the team practice such as batting while they do their home work, and with a good public transit system it's practical for them to get off the internet and into their communities. I coined the term "Backyard Gulag".
I honestly think they should put the tower on the left side of the Helmsley Building (if facing towards it from Park Avenue) in which the building that stands there is a concrete cube. This decision would not dwarf the Chrysler Building as much, but this also means the Grand Hyatt Hotel wouldn't be demolished and would give it a chance to have its facade restored.
Lovely building but it’s blocking all the views of the Chrysler unfortunately. You use to get this wonderful view of the Chrysler from the street by Bryant park. Shame
After 40 years in architecture I’ve seen developers and architects put a spin on everything. They can sell sewage treatment plants as play grounds for children.
If you're going to build a massive building this is the perfect place to do so. NIMBYs who oppose building then complain about housing prices always makes me laugh
@@rafalpruszynski6129 Generally speaking, the more buildings there are, the housing will cost. While this will only have offices hotel and high end residences, it still fits the bill. IMHO zoning adjacent to transit hubs should have no density restrictions at all.
Totally out of scale with its surroundings. An ego trip for the developer and architects. Midtown NYC is lost, used to love its character but that’s gone now.
The building's design is impressive but its way to large, too imposing, and painfully close to the deco architectural icon, the beautiful Chrysler Building!!! The city planners should never have approved this behemoth unless it was to be built at a respectable distance from such a beautiful, timeless building that many would agree, still after almost a hundred years one of the most iconic buildings ever built!!! Shame on the city planning department!!! 😵💫😡😲🥺😱
PROBLEM > SOLUTION: PROBLEM: it DISGRACEFULLY OVERWHELMS + diminishes one of the GREATEST ALL-TIME ARCHITECTURAL MASTERPIECES OF DESIGN. SOLUTION: Build it on the STATE-OWNED lot across from Javits Center (b'twn Javits main entry + Bella Abzug Park) - - literally RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET from the BRAND NEW SPECTACULAR 7-train entrance. (u won't have any of the engineering NIGHTMARES over GCS subways that will take F-O-R-E-V-E-R to build - - and NY'ers will APPROVE)
Why can’t America with billions spent from sports to entertainment to retail and defence build a building taller than Burj Khalifa is their done kind of subtle pressure from the sultan to not build anything taller than theirs .
Has anyone been monitoring the health effects of the additional radiation exposure that results from being in high buildings for prolong per periods? Pilots and aircrews have very elevated rates of cancers.
Who is it for? The oligarchs? Majority of people living in NYC can’t afford living there. Affordable housing? Laughable.. Congestive pricing. Mass transit price increases. Laughable.
"As the world grapple with climate change". There, you inserted politics needlessly. You were doing so well. Yes, if we don't agree with CC we are nad, regardless if those pushing it, such as you, are doing all you can, to limit your CO2 footprint. Not subscribing nor giving you a thumbs up.
Keep pushing climate change. I don’t want to leave a “dead world”, to my children. This is science. It’s real. There have always been those who don’t believe in science, where would we be if we listen to them. That building you’re talking about is a product of highly advanced science and ironically would never be able to be build if we’d listen to no scientific reasoning. Thanks.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
What topic should I cover in my next video?
how about the great skyscrapers that somehow did not get built in NYC, like the Met Life, 110 story Deco building
I just moved to Denver, and I think it's worth a "survey" of recently completed projects. Frankly, I'm really impressed with the bevy of new buildings that have changed the city's look over the last 15 years -- an art museum, a courthouse, a performing arts complex, new sports stadiums and some gorgeous mid-rise business towers. No other American city, in my opinion, has grown so fast with so much good architectural taste. Denver's decisions seem to actually care about the eyes of the people who must face the built environment every day.
@@TWOCOWS1on the list! What about the 80 South Street?
@@prototropo I'll look into it! Thanks for your input!
Can you go over the now approved and funded western hemispheres tallest skyscraper that will soon be built in Oklahoma?
The narration sounds like it was taken directly from the property owner's self-complimenting public relations home page.
100% Corporate press release. Gaslighting!
The Hyatt hotel was already lost when it was stripped of its character and the covered in glass. That was long ago.
It was the COmmodore Hotel originally
That was President Trump's (then citizen Trump's) first building project - - it TRANSFORMED the area
(which had turned into a seedy dumpy run-down neighborhood.)
They want to take it down BECAUSE Trump built it (immature + petty cry-baby politics)
Shocking what this new building does to the Chrysler Building! 😱
Already feel that way about the JP Morgan Building 🥲
I bet there were lots of people who complained about what the Chrysler Building did to its neighbors back when it was built. Times and things change.
It's a city, not a museum.
It is already hidden among taller buildings. It can't keep low density at a transit hub for landmark reasons. A shorter building or renovation is not economical. The existing building is obsolete.
This building is going to completely destroy the majesty of the Chrysler building, to the point of placing it in peril of replacement just like the Commodore.
Probably in as little as 20 years.
I like to see Art Deco getting a comeback
I've been mesmerized by this building for some time now. I do hope it gets built.
I'd be more mesmerized if I found out of any grand constructions in Haiti.
the architecture is a mixture of art deco and modernism
@@gamer1X12 emphasis on modernism though.
Disaster for the Crysler Building
This is unusual to say … it is a beautiful looking building!
New York is home to many stunning buildings. Are there any specific ones you'd like to see featured on my channel?
It’s going to totally overshadow the classic historic Chrysler Building….what a shame.
No mention of the horrendous impact on the Chrysler building. Quite an oversight I'd say.
Some of the windows on the bottom remind me of the old WTC.
With work from home and hybrid models having caused a huge office vacancy rate in all major cities, one wonders if there is such a need for this colossal structure. But it's the massive disrespect towards the Chrysler Building across the street which appalls me. It's as if they want to hide the most beloved skyscraper in New York. You won't be able to view the Chrysler Building anymore from any direction except the East, and even then it will have the massive Commodore building right behind it serving as a backdrop. Did you notice how many times the Chrysler Building was shown in this video, proudly towering over Grand Central and the Hyatt? Well say goodbye to those views forever. I really hope this thing never gets built, or at least not at this location.
For years the most beloved skyscraper in NYC was the Singer Building. At least the Chrysler Building isn't being demolished. If you want frozen in time stick to Colonial Williamsburg.
@@LJB103 I guess we should never have created the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission then? Grand Central Terminal and Radio City Music Hall were both on the chopping block but saved by it. Were we just wanting to be frozen in time?
@@brmnyc They weren't demolished, but it doesn't mean that you cannot build big around them.
@@LJB103 Or what you do is jack the Chrysler building up 751 feet and build new floor space between the existing lobby and upper portion which would be cut apart. Basically the same thing that was done to the Palace Theater just on a much grander scale. Then, you lower it onto the newly-built floor space and you have a building that goes up 1,797 feet to project commodore's 1,581. The Chrysler gets to retain its position on the skyline but for a new era.
Love everything about this tower. Terrific content too! You earned a sub. Keep up the great work! All things American, I’m on board!
Thanks for your support!
Special and landmark buildings are walled in stone and not glass and steel.
They should’ve made this tower at least 2,000 feet high. And a bit more decorative, out of all the new tallest buildings of NYC this one is my favorite design.
I agree. It should be at least 2,000 feet tall!
Maybe they could go for the original height of 1,642 feet but then maybe they add a 400 foot spire, that would make it a megatall
@@Zoods_ did the faa tell the developers to cut down the size of the skyscraper?
@AnixCo1990 No. Planes don't fly over Manhattan so building height is not in question.
@@Zoods_ That would've been awesome!
Just what we need, another empty building with no tenants in the retail space.
Wow, you have some quick growth on your channel, congratulations! And keep up the good content.
Thank you! I'm very happy with it. Thanks to all of you!
Thanks for taking the time to create this informative and entertaining video.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Great job… good luck with the channel
Thank you!
the building’s beautiful no doubt, but its scale is absolutely unreasonable. the same with the new foster&partners skyscraper. why can’t we show some respect for the surrounding patrimonial architecture?? why does the chrysler building have to be so overshadowed by these new buildings?? i believe that “showing respect” to past architecture should go way beyond some slight design aspects. these new monstrous towers just don’t fit in the urban envoirement they’re going to be placed in
get over it, nyc is for tall buildings.
Totally agree with you!!!
Do you know when they start this construction
This tower is HUGE and feels out of place at this specific location. However, I do love the design. Overall good video but my only point of contention is the clip of the Chicago L at 5:38 passing off as MTA.
I saw the "L," too. Immediately. And I'm no NY-er...but I knew that wasn't right. Hard to imagine any video producer (or "content creator") being that sloppy and, further, presuming the audience won't know.
It is a huge tower at a time when people do not want to come in to work at the office, NYC is filled with crime, filthy rundown subway system, grimy dirty streets, litter everywhere, thugery, homelessness and drugs everywhere in pure daylight, less police to protect, and counteract crime, homicides, vandalism, etc, etc. NYC has lost its style, glam, opulence, it is nothing but a dysfunctional city that is mediocre infrastructure, police, rescue, emergency agencies, are reduced like never before. Why go ahead with this costly tiresome played out project. What is in it for the law abiding citizens that are poorer and run down, ignored, that are just trying to survive the violent, ugly jungle that NYC has become now in 2024 the 21st century.
A brief look at the situation, I see office vacancy rates in that area around one in five to one in four, so this is a situation normally new space would be difficult to support.
Visually, the tower's architecture is convincing, but its footprint is too BIG! It trivializes both Grand Central and the Chrysler building.
If it just reduced its entire scale by 10 percent or even less, 8 percent, the neighboring structures could retain some dignity in their volume. This video is well-informed and narrated, but too laudatory. I love the addition of more architecture didcussions on YT, but I hope the channel aims for objective dialog, over a promotional tone.
The renderings are gorgeous. I prefer the new build to the hotel. The hotel was nothing special to look at. The new building really makes a statement. I lived in NYC for 24 years. It's an amazing place. No matter what the economy is like, the construction never seems to slow down. For people that live there, it's just a part of life.
Very American and simplistic vision of the audio commentary.
The building itself is a success from the outside, its design is sober, elegant and is meant to recall the New York architecture of the last century.
The real negative point is its immediate proximity to the Chrysler building.
This building will definitely break the view and the atmosphere of the neighborhood
I think of this iconic view at the bottom of Grand Central, with the Chrysler building.
A view that visitors and tourists love!
And there are still more than 60 million of them per year in the city…
So it’s a shame.
This is my favorite area of New York City, and I know it extremely well. The Chrysler Building is my favorite building ever. I actually don't like this new building because of the way it looms over the Chrysler Building. But I do love the street-level/Viaduct-level aspect of the place. That is truly epic. The Hyatt Hotel has been a has-been property for 30 years now, so it is no big loss. But yeah... I do wish this new building was half the height that it is, as the Chrysler Building will all but disappear from the skyline with that monster building next to it. So thumbs down in general for this building, but at least New York is starting to get that in on that Tokyo style of making the street level and mezzanine of new buildings into walkable and accessible parkland.
Great observations. I've always considered the Chrysler Building to be NYC's most beautiful skyscraper. However, it's already been dwarfed in the neighborhood by new construction. As a native NYer, the constantly changing skyline is exciting and a further testament to the City's uniqueness.
New York is home to many stunning buildings. Are there any specific ones you'd like to see featured on my channel?
It will be the tallest building in the US..... SPIRE DOES NOT COUNT on a Freedom Tower.
Agree, spires should not be counted.
Agreed. Spires are for cheaters.
Please build it now. Thanks!
I love the design. Really nice. They should add a spire to follow the lead of the Chrysler next door, and reach the 2000 feet height
That would be cool!
@@Engineering-Unveiled 🙂
This new skyscraper by SOM is a step in the right direction. The structural latice pays homage to the late Zaha Hadid, adding architectural interest to the skyline. I would love to see more buildings push the future envelope.
Why is the New York City subway such a shit hole , with billions of dollars of property above it .?
This will be the most beautiful skyscraper in the United States
One of the most beautiful skyscrapers. Let's not forget Mies van der Rohe's buildings in NY and Chicago, the Sears Tower, John Hancock Center and the Chrysler Building. Just to name a few. But again, this is looking amazing.
I hope this building doesn't get built. It's going to completely dwarf the Chrysler building
Its already approved from what I've read. 😞
I have been wondering when they were going to make a gothic inspired skyscraper with gothic arched points like in the old World Trade Towers.
Why build such a large tall tower right next to the striking and beautiful Chrysler building?
How can a building at 42nd and Lex have a Park Avenue address?
The Hyatt replacement is much closer to the iconic Chrysler Building than the computer rendering eluded to. It’s going to be totally dominated by this new edition.
NYC only needs Empire State Building, Crystal, Grand Central, Brooklyn Bridge and Central Park to maintain its historical character.
Wow, that looks classy.
I agree! Are there any specific ones you'd like to see featured on my channel?
@@Engineering-Unveiled I like the chicago concept but I feel it should be moved into the heart of Chicago and have a transit station for bus & rail, such as a greyhound & city, subway & and amtrack.
The concept of building stadiums on the outskirts of communities is a 1960s concept when there wasn't substantial infrastructure debt, as in when everything was brand new and didn't have 50 years of wear and tare.
Simply put rural towns are now going back to gravel roads because they have to decide if they're going to be able to pay the teachers or have nice paved roads.
My prediction is that once the taboo of not raising federal gas taxes since 1993 has been breached, Gas prices will quickly double and then triple decades later from current price, that's an issue when people have a nuclear melt down over gas prices going up 20 cents a gallon.
Then there's the mental ruinous aspect of car dependency. Kids are esentially trapped in their backyard until they turn 18 as it's impractical to ask 5 freinds to all each walk 2 hours(1 hour of walking one way) to meet up.
By moving stadiums into communities you could then offer youth passes for local students to get them out of their houses to watch the team practice such as batting while they do their home work, and with a good public transit system it's practical for them to get off the internet and into their communities.
I coined the term "Backyard Gulag".
This is a video I'd like to show to those carefree people who say Tokyo has surpassed New York.😎
I honestly think they should put the tower on the left side of the Helmsley Building (if facing towards it from Park Avenue) in which the building that stands there is a concrete cube.
This decision would not dwarf the Chrysler Building as much, but this also means the Grand Hyatt Hotel wouldn't be demolished and would give it a chance to have its facade restored.
I think it is grotesque primarily by its massive scale, which dwarfs the neighboring Chrysler and the Grand Central Station .
Come on , Build it in CHICAGO !😂😂😂❤❤❤
So much of this project depends on the subways, beneath it, yet those subways are so dangerous that they are unusable. A white elephant.
Lovely building but it’s blocking all the views of the Chrysler unfortunately. You use to get this wonderful view of the Chrysler from the street by Bryant park. Shame
After 40 years in architecture I’ve seen developers and architects put a spin on everything. They can sell sewage treatment plants as play grounds for children.
1:55 The Chrysler building looks so obsolete in the renderings
Looks monstrous and out of proportion with surrounding buildings
Agree. Not sure how people don’t see this.
I'm sure that's what people said too when they built the Chrysler Bldg.
If you're going to build a massive building this is the perfect place to do so. NIMBYs who oppose building then complain about housing prices always makes me laugh
@danielwalker6653 how will this lower housing prices?
@@rafalpruszynski6129 Generally speaking, the more buildings there are, the housing will cost. While this will only have offices hotel and high end residences, it still fits the bill. IMHO zoning adjacent to transit hubs should have no density restrictions at all.
Totally out of scale with its surroundings. An ego trip for the developer and architects. Midtown NYC is lost, used to love its character but that’s gone now.
The building's design is impressive but its way to large, too imposing, and painfully close to the deco architectural icon, the beautiful Chrysler Building!!! The city planners should never have approved this behemoth unless it was to be built at a respectable distance from such a beautiful, timeless building that many would agree, still after almost a hundred years one of the most iconic buildings ever built!!! Shame on the city planning department!!! 😵💫😡😲🥺😱
Anybody notice how they snuck the Chicago Elevated Line into the video
WOW WOW WOW !!!
PROBLEM > SOLUTION:
PROBLEM: it DISGRACEFULLY OVERWHELMS + diminishes one of the GREATEST ALL-TIME ARCHITECTURAL MASTERPIECES OF DESIGN.
SOLUTION: Build it on the STATE-OWNED lot across from Javits Center (b'twn Javits main entry + Bella Abzug Park) - -
literally RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET from the BRAND NEW SPECTACULAR 7-train entrance.
(u won't have any of the engineering NIGHTMARES over GCS subways that will take F-O-R-E-V-E-R to build - - and NY'ers will APPROVE)
Maybe the tower can releive some of the burden from the Roosevelt Hotel.
The Hyatt hotel will not be missed, trust me.
Much too tall; it dwarfs the Chrysler Building and cuts the view of it.
Beautiful building. I really hope it gets built. The glass building there is truly one ugly building.
New York is home to many stunning buildings. Are there any specific ones you'd like to see featured on my channel?
Why can’t America with billions spent from sports to entertainment to retail and defence build a building taller than Burj Khalifa is their done kind of subtle pressure from the sultan to not build anything taller than theirs .
This is what the freedom fries tower should have been
The hotel will take up the top third of the building without it this would only be a 1000' tall building
Has anyone been monitoring the health effects of the additional radiation exposure that results from being in high buildings for prolong per periods? Pilots and aircrews have very elevated rates of cancers.
Add metric please
It looks like its roots grow out of GCS like weeds
I just feel like the city, needs to take that money and build better SCHOOLS, HOUSING, PUT MONEY IN THE ARTS, and TRANSPORTATION
Do you really need another building? In NYC
3:16
Wtf is up with that rendering?? 😂 😭 💀
Too eerie. Too much like the WTC twin towers. Bad mojo.
If this one indicates the quality of your content, I look forward to your subsequent work.
Thank you!
Who is it for? The oligarchs? Majority of people living in NYC can’t afford living there. Affordable housing? Laughable.. Congestive pricing. Mass transit price increases. Laughable.
Not gonna happen. Won’t even break ground. Won’t even demolish the hotel on the site, either.
controversial? that think looks sweet-
🙏
After all this, it's just another supertall marring the Manhattan cityscape. I hope it's an economic failure.
Looks like the original World Trade Center ………..
So stupid to tear down a perfectly decent building.
"As the world grapple with climate change". There, you inserted politics needlessly. You were doing so well. Yes, if we don't agree with CC we are nad, regardless if those pushing it, such as you, are doing all you can, to limit your CO2 footprint. Not subscribing nor giving you a thumbs up.
Thanks for the feedback! I’ll definitely keep it in mind for my next video.
Keep pushing climate change. I don’t want to leave a “dead world”, to my children. This is science. It’s real. There have always been those who don’t believe in science, where would we be if we listen to them. That building you’re talking about is a product of highly advanced science and ironically would never be able to be build if we’d listen to no scientific reasoning. Thanks.
To Me It Won't Be Built!!!
No shade but what’s the point? Lol
Monstrosity.
I was going to subscribe until i heard “climate change”.
What topics interest you? I’ll keep them in mind when making my next video
@ dam removal videos have been very popular and eye opening.
Damn, orange man ruined the facade of that hotel