Contrary to the centralization of power; AI will decentralize the power into the hands of the masses. A decade ago, most people in the AI field openly said that AI will create new jobs as it replaces the older ones. However, most of those today admit AI can replace almost all human Jobs therefore "the power will concentrate in the hands of a few". However they forget that when all human labour becomes obsolete, all administrative "human" jobs will also become obsolete along with it, there will be no justification for those minority to stay in power, they will have the same power as everyone has, that is "one vote to one person". In short; this will be the "decentralization of power into the hands of the masses" that I am hinting about.
AI does not erase the biological reflexes that are responsible for power hierarchy in the first place. Power does not shift to 'the masses' (unless 'the masses' are engaged), it shifts to the owners of the tech. Hence Technocracy. The opposite of your hypothesis will happen imo, post industrial form of aristocracy will benefit most. To a billionaire only another billionaire is a human.
@@a.tevetoglu3366 I respectfully disagree with your saying that the present “Technocracy” will survive in the AI future. In the coming AGI dominated future, the rapid progress in technology will render all human labour redundant. Therefore an ‘equitable’ Unconditional Basic Income (UBI) will become necessary to prevent the popular uprising of the masses. The present legacy (capitalism, socialism etc.) world economy based on income, wages, profit, commodity values (money) will crumble down due to the consequences of UBI. In our present society most human crimes (including sexuality) are motivated by economic values or “money” therefore ending the money will also make most crimes as we know today, to go out of the existence. In My 1981 "Reduction in Working Hours Theory”, I departed from Marxism, claiming that “The human labour relations (compulsion) in order to obtain their means of subsistence is the root cause of exploitation that leads to almost all kinds of evils in human society.” The popular mass movement which began with the UBI probably will continue to survive with the collective decision (one person one vote) as the democratic “will” of the people, taking “control” of the power instead of a minority. Humans merging with the AGI, or ASI perhaps the right solution at the end.
why do they insistently refer to fine-tuning as pre-training, can someone explain?
Contrary to the centralization of power; AI will decentralize the power into the hands of the masses.
A decade ago, most people in the AI field openly said that AI will create new jobs as it replaces the older ones. However, most of those today admit AI can replace almost all human Jobs therefore "the power will concentrate in the hands of a few". However they forget that when all human labour becomes obsolete, all administrative "human" jobs will also become obsolete along with it, there will be no justification for those minority to stay in power, they will have the same power as everyone has, that is "one vote to one person". In short; this will be the "decentralization of power into the hands of the masses" that I am hinting about.
AI does not erase the biological reflexes that are responsible for power hierarchy in the first place. Power does not shift to 'the masses' (unless 'the masses' are engaged), it shifts to the owners of the tech. Hence Technocracy. The opposite of your hypothesis will happen imo, post industrial form of aristocracy will benefit most. To a billionaire only another billionaire is a human.
@@a.tevetoglu3366 I respectfully disagree with your saying that the present “Technocracy” will survive in the AI future. In the coming AGI dominated future, the rapid progress in technology will render all human labour redundant. Therefore an ‘equitable’ Unconditional Basic Income (UBI) will become necessary to prevent the popular uprising of the masses. The present legacy (capitalism, socialism etc.) world economy based on income, wages, profit, commodity values (money) will crumble down due to the consequences of UBI. In our present society most human crimes (including sexuality) are motivated by economic values or “money” therefore ending the money will also make most crimes as we know today, to go out of the existence.
In My 1981 "Reduction in Working Hours Theory”, I departed from Marxism, claiming that “The human labour relations (compulsion) in order to obtain their means of subsistence is the root cause of exploitation that leads to almost all kinds of evils in human society.”
The popular mass movement which began with the UBI probably will continue to survive with the collective decision (one person one vote) as the democratic “will” of the people, taking “control” of the power instead of a minority. Humans merging with the AGI, or ASI perhaps the right solution at the end.
@@vallab19 what exactly is it that you imply when stating " human merging w AI " ?
@@a.tevetoglu3366 Cyborg like.