Nancy McWilliams on Psychoanalysis and its Discontents (and hopes for the future)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @phoneutria3037
    @phoneutria3037 7 років тому +26

    I simply adore Nancy McWilliams! She's so intelligent and illuminating!

  • @tomtaft9861
    @tomtaft9861 3 місяці тому +1

    Such a warm and accessible and important conversation between 2 equally warm and wonderful people.

  • @petermastroianni2366
    @petermastroianni2366 5 років тому +14

    Nancy is an amazing writer and such an intelligent woman. You can tell she’s warm. Her books are amazing.

  • @danmart1879
    @danmart1879 6 років тому +10

    Brilliant woman. Absolute gem in the world of psychoanalysis.

  • @psychiatrypsychotherapy6939
    @psychiatrypsychotherapy6939 Рік тому +3

    Beautiful discussion. Great interview. Thoughtful questions. You did good background research.

  • @lauriehawkes7781
    @lauriehawkes7781 5 місяців тому

    Such open thinking! I just love reading her writing and listening to her.

  • @jflemay
    @jflemay 18 днів тому

    This is a great interview with Ms. McWilliams and the host Mr. Vaz is well prepared. Could I kindly ask that the host refrain from speaking over the interviewee or laughing loudly? As a reference, I suggest listening to podcasts by The New York Times such as The Daily where the host waits until the interviewee is done before saying "hum-hum" and speaks in a calm voice without loud moments. Thank you.

  • @victoriazhang4861
    @victoriazhang4861 4 роки тому +3

    Wonderful video!

  • @KeithJ108
    @KeithJ108 8 місяців тому +2

    Has Nancy ever published the book on mental health she refers to @18:35?

    • @KeithJ108
      @KeithJ108 8 місяців тому

      The answer is no, but some of the content was added to her book on supervision.

  • @evangelosgiannopoulos-isar9572
    @evangelosgiannopoulos-isar9572 7 років тому +3

    Very Interesting

  • @SevenRavens007
    @SevenRavens007 Рік тому +2

    22:39 The Zulus in Australia”?? 😂

  • @fredavalbjorkstormnielsen7389
    @fredavalbjorkstormnielsen7389 Рік тому +1

    she reminder me of Marion Woodman 👍

  • @erby1kabogey9
    @erby1kabogey9 6 років тому +2

    Should have been longer.

  • @Ricardo-ds3kf
    @Ricardo-ds3kf 4 роки тому +6

    So is psychoanalysis only for affluent people? Or who's gonna pay for 2+ years of therapy for every poor soul out there just scraping by? Can't the push for shorter therapies be seen as an attempt to increase availability of mental health care -- especially for non-affluent people?

    • @leticiaflores4644
      @leticiaflores4644 3 роки тому +6

      or we could look at revising our health care system so that everyone could afford to be treated better. while some short-term therapies can work well for some, others need more than 30 minutes every other week to understand their issues and find more contentment/agency in their lives. why should we settle for good tx for few/poor treatment for most, instead of good tx for all?

    • @danielmeixner7125
      @danielmeixner7125 10 місяців тому

      ​@@leticiaflores4644in what reality is the system going to front up hundreds of dollars a week for YEARS? For who knows how many people? Not gonna happen this century. And in the meantime the rich get decent treatment and the poor get cbt. And psychoanalysis shrugs its shoulders.

  • @nononouh
    @nononouh 2 роки тому +1

    15

  • @demaskatorr
    @demaskatorr 28 днів тому

    .

  • @jupiterinaries6150
    @jupiterinaries6150 6 років тому +2

    I can barely hear the damn interviewer!!