Today I learned that 4K DLSS quality = 1080p apparently. what a dumb take 4K upscaling looks basically the same as native and far better than 1080p even in performance mode. And above 60FPS frame gen works wonders.
@@DragonOfTheMortalKombat 4K DLSS Quality isnt the same as 1080p, (The perfomance is way lower than native 1080p), so its a trade off, looks better, performs worse.
The game is using Unreal Engine 5.1, I believe, which does not support nanite for trees and foliage which is why there still noticeable LOD issues on Epic settings. I think nanite was added for trees/foliage from 5.2 so hopefully the developers will update the engine to a newer build in time so fix the pop in fully.
This has nothing to do with the gpus. Sadly this is one of the worst (un)optimized games in the last few years. When you think it can’t get any worse , they prove us wrong. Better wait until they fix this shit i guess
@@venbeer don't think they did, cos I'm on a 7700xt and have zero stutter and it runs smooth as glass. All the reviews moaning about stutter are all people with 4090s. 😂
@@MrLilredmachineOkay if you think your 7700xt is better than 4090 I don’t know what to say. Im more picky when it comes to smoothness of a game considering I spent 1,900 on a gpu.
JUP another game wich i dont wanna support ^^ the developers these days are a fucking joke i have a fucking 7800x3d and a 4080 bro but still u cant play some tripple A games in native lul
4k at dlss quality is not 1080p , is 1440p , and this is unreal engine 5 , so don´t expect play it at 100fps with your potato pc , of course they need to optimize with future patches , but UE5 and also lumen is really taxing on hardware , lumen is indeed a form of raytracing , global illumination , by itself is very demanding , and still an rtx4070 can play this game at 70fps at 4k epic settings , dlss performance and frame generation enabled , wich is not that bad for a 500$ gpu
one of the biggest problems with devs these days is they don't fake some things to let CPU and GPU breath easy so they import a bunch of mega scans and high res VFX and textures that sends your PC to the moon
Shadows does actually get blurrier and less detailed the further away from the object irl, but that flickering is a graphical issue with UE5 that they need to fix other then forcing the game developers to fix it for their project every time.
The shader cache size thingy.. i never disabled it before. me for now i noticed improvments to the games i was playing which makes no sense. So yes i am trying my best to get my computer running good lol u seem just fine i guess yea lol i am the one with the computer problems
You know what? It's probably the game's fault... I've been seeing it time and time again, optimization has gone down the drain unfortunately, and there's nothing we can do to fix it, even brute forcing it doesn't work because the games still stutter 😭
Getting a rock solid 20 fps in the first town with my RTX2060/R5 3600/32GB at 1080p/Medium/DLSS Balanced 😎👍 I know it's prehistoric tech at this point but damn...
@ramborambokitchenkitchen6357 Yeah, I know, I mainly play on PS5 I was just curious to see how it would run. Though I mean it can still run RDR2, Cyberpunk at 1440p med settings with 60+ frames so it's probably more UE5 and bad optimization at fault.
@@jacobgames34127800x3D, 7800xt, 32GB 6400mhz DDR5. Most games run great for me at 1440p. Bo6 runs at 1440p extreme at 200fps. I know that my gpu isn’t the best but it’s crazy that I barely meet the minimum for this game.
I can run RDR2 on Max with no issues. Same with gamma on Max. I7, radeon 5700, with 32 gig ram and I'm being told will have to play on medium...@@cleiters4180
Really enjoy your videos mate. I myself have 4060 TI and your videos really help me see the detailed insights of how the performance of my card would turn out before playing any game.
As someone who saved money and bought a pretty beefy PC, seeing the "made in UE5" bs usually just tell me the devs are lacking in the artistic department and are compensating by using this buggy ass engine. It is not worth it. Imagine mid or low end PC users. This isn't SH2, you're going to need stability, smooth FPS, not the "inevitable" traversal drops.
It looks gorgeous though. I think going for UE5 is a good idea. Just to update it to 5.2 itd be better. Original stalkers are played even today, very popular modding. This being in ue5 will easily last 10+yrs.
@@prezlamen7906 It's a terrible platform, for people who lack artistic skills and want pretty assets. Every single UE5 game runs poorly. The best developers have their own engine. Even MH Wild, which also requires framegen, can at least maintain a steady 80fps with no drops on my PC (4080+i712700k)
It's very expensive to develop your own engine tho. Plus UE5 has tons of documentation and support from the devs. They've been pushing updates like crazy, but I do wish they would focus more on optimization instead of eye candy, but unfortunately it's eye candy that gets most people excited...
@@prezlamen7906 as long as there are gamers and modders, stalker 2 will live forever. Stalker 2 is everything i dreamed/wished for in terms of graphics. We already have 75+ mods that rebalance the game and we are only 2 days in. Its gonna be mods galore when official tools release
Tell me about it. Ive played all up that loner village holding the X button and going at snail pace. Its gorgeous. Especially at night. I love it. Cant wait for the weekend ill spend locked in my room playing.
@@svgeier After playing through lesser zone and uninstalling S2, ive concluded it looks ok but it looks like any other UE5 game, except thats all it does. It feels more like a demo game, or a game still in alpha. It needs at least 1 more yr, possibly 2 to be considered a released game by me.
I'd like to see some of these games tested with ALL CPU Cores enabled. Some games, ( like Microsoft Flight Sim 2024) actually utilise the no 3D Cache cores, just using raw number of threads instead. I know most games likely run better on 3D Cache cores, but I'd like to see how the games utilise a CPU with all cores enabeld and if developers are clever enough to make them prefer the cores that run better without needing to manually disable them.
One thing that helped me with my 7950x3d cpu is actually enabling all cores to go at full blast instead of just X3D cores. It seems to like more cores rather than 3D V cache
People need to understand that UE5 is horribly optimized to begin with. Due to how graphically intensive lighting is, it’s almost impossible make it run better. People should just use UE4 instead because it’s basically the same engine just with worse graphics.
The graphics are the best part of UE5. The graphics are incredible but so are the requirements. Kinda disappointing how a $1,600 gpu can barely hit 60fps at 4k
Unreal engine should just be dropped. We can blame normies/casuals tbh. All they seem to care about are le pretty graphics over actually good games. It’s why they love sony cinematic slops and games like RDR2.
@@gorillagroddgamingRDR 2 is a graphical masterpiece from Rockstar Studios that even many 2022-2024 games cannot beat yet, And it's very optimized for how it looks. UE5, on the other hand, is an attempt to get max graphic as cheap as possible. Yet many games using UE5 still cannot beat RDR2 graphical achievement. UE 5 is causing bad and lazy dev sacrificing performance for visual. They better if with Unity as they also have those great graphic yet easier to optimize.
I don't excuse poor performance (as a result of lacking optimization) regardless of how "graphically intensive" a game is. The development team underwent hardship, but this is still a product made available for sale in its current condition. This needed to be delayed by another year or so, and based on several initial reviews of this game, it seems that all of those publications can agree. It isn't 2007 anymore.
4:35 Please Kryzzp I think we would all love, if you went around some places in Portugal and talked about the "textures, lighting, shadows, view distance, and so on" it would be so funny. Maybe for April fools?:D
At least it's one of the games that don't look worse with DLSS Quality but get a major performance boost. RTX 4080S in 1440p high settings 60-70fps with DLSS Quality 90-100fps.
I think you need Fullscreen (Borderless) if you want FSR FG to work, it did work on my RTX 3050 but the input lag was noticeable even at 100+ FPS. Also, please enable NVIDIA Reflex, it helps a lot with input lag, I went from 100 ms to like 55 ms.
I copy/paste my comment I wrote under this video, maybe it helps a bit: "Playing the game with a 7600x and a 4080 Super on 1440p, all settings on Epic, DLSS at DLAA with around 100 FPS in average (~70 in the first village)... Tbh, I'm fine with it. I'm still using a 60Hz monitor anyway. The cutscenes are sometimes under 60 FPS for a few seconds, but that doesn't bother me."
Wow...I was suspecting that you will be doing benchmark of Stalkier 2 but I did not expect that soon!!! I thought I will check today( 21st) lol. Well done mate!!!
bro i just want to clarify something is the rx7900 xtx better than 4090 if i don't want to play with rt, i have watched almost all your videos and came to a conclusion that only in black myth wukong it was a problem for the rx 7900xtx. and also the prize difference is soo much.
Getting rid of pop-in sounds so much more appealing to me than better lighting and shadows. I'm fine with where things are at as far as those two aspects.
@hellsbells8979 Anybody can boast about being better than others. Plus, the textures along autdo like 99% of the games on the market. Also GSC Game Wolf is temporarily located in Prague, nice try. It is a Ukranian game studio and up until Russia got daring and properly pushed Ukraine, it had been there. A dev or two in the studio has passed because they went to fight in the war.
@@PixelatedWolf2077 they located in Kiev, where is no sight of any war, and moved to Prague almost next day, when the war started. Yes one person of studio left to war. But I'm sure he wasn't main responsible person for optimisation. It just excuses. Before war they moved release day every month, and it even became mem , after war, they made this exuse as oficial. Btw first stalker was raw and not optimised aswell, so basically its a tradition. I just hate when lazy developers blame whole word, but not themselves
@hellsbells8979 However that's still in Ukraine...as I mentioned before. Also no one exactly knew how far Russia was going to push in. On top of the war is STILL going on. When you are stressed with work and worrying if your family and friends are okay, you will also do worse with your work or projects. Anxiety doesn't help with that either. If Russia somehow happens to take all of Ukraine, then they wouldn't have a home either.
@11:21 my frame rate is far higher on 3440x1440P with a 7900 XT in that area no FSR or FG. Sooooooooooooooooooooooo Nvidia has some fixing to do driver wise as does GSC game wise I guess lol big time. I'm for the most part 60+ and the area I mentioned It doesn't dip below 50's
Ive a 4090 and it certainly does drop into the 50s with dlss and frame gen, it drops into the 40s in the towns randomly from 120fps. The frame times are all over the place. It's still remarkably compelling to play.
While I get people complaining about optimization but at the same time the industry needs to progress in graphics , physics etc , we've been stuck with the same COD looking games for like 8 years now. It's about time developers started pushing the tech a bit more which is refreshing to see.
It's both, it should be looking better, optimization complaints are showing that, if nothing is changing, clearly it shouldn't be running so bad, therefore the whole "why can't a game just be intensive" argument doesn't work
No it is an optimization issue lol. There are equally good looking games that require half as much raw power (Wukong; CP2077; Ghost of Tsushima; RDR2; Metro Exodus)
Game runs fine on my 7800X3D with 7800xt imo, high/medium settings with FSR Balanced at uwqhd i get around 70 fps could be better but with framegen its about 140-150 which is fine. Turn down shadows, reflections and lighting to medium and its much better
This game is everything but not good looking at least for me. I don't know, but somehow it feels like an old title, which came out 10 years ago by the looks.
To me the graphics are mind blowing but maybe I’m playing the wrong games.. idk how to explain it but the depth in the game seems very realistic with all the shadows being casted
@@zWORMzGaming Yeah with 3-5 wooden empty houses and 5-6 trees amazing. How difficult to have insane looking textures if you have much less objects and gameplay like that
a ue5 game you can turn off AA completley, fkng finally, and TAA and DLSS is not that blurry in this game compared to something like gray zone warfare, why is it this hard to implement lol.
Hey, Kryzzp! I just want to tell you that my father is building me my very first PC with a Ryzen 7 9700X, an RX 7800 XT and 32GB RAM for Christmas! I’m very excited to play Cyberpunk, Dragon Age: The Veilguard and Stalker 2 at Maximum Settings! I’m so excited!
And yet people complain about $500 consoles running at 4k30fps and the PS5 Pro running at 4k60fps, a $2000 graphics card can't even run the game 2-3x better, a game that is also on the Xbox Series
Those consoles use much lower graphic settings and run at dynamic or upscaled 4k, ps5 pro ain't doing native 4k 60 fps my guy. The 4080 super triples the fps of the ps5 at similar settings, digital foundry tested it in some games. 4090 would therefore almost triple the fps of the ps5 pro@@S3NSEI507
@@S3NSEI507 Except for the exclusives most of the PS5 games are not running at native 4k Resolution, while the games are unoptimized on PC people have this misconception that PS5 is actually running games at 4k which it is not for any of the demanding titles.
@firzokkhan6443 native 4k or not, don't forget the price of the rtx4090, 3x the price of a console, even if it uses 4k upscaling, it's still 1500€ cheaper
@@S3NSEI507 Well if you are going to use upscaler as a crutch then an RTX 4060 or an RX 6700xt can outperform PS5 via FSR and DLSS in most cases, what people are actually pissed about is the native 4k is hard to achieve in Unreal Engine 5 games, PS5 upscales from resolution lower than 900p in games using Unreal Engine 5 or other similarly demanding engines and it is not like I have anything against consoles as I still have a Nintendo Switch and all Sony consoles till PS4 but to achieve playable frame rate the consoles does downscales the resolution massively.
They had an excuse. Which one? They've been making the game for 15 years and then, they promised to release the game almost three years ago... and then they had an excuse.
at 12:02 the 'almost' fastest gaming cpu on the market is strugling to get 50 fps i'm still rocking a 3400g + 4070 with 4k60 display the gaming industry is so so damn broken either they optimize it or i won't pay a damn cent ( vnd in my country ) nice vid
playing this on a 4070Super and the answer is frame gen for now it actually makes it way more responsive and evens out stuttering/frametimes for me at 1440p/epic/DLAA. Beautiful game though
So for the flickering textures I have this same issue happen in a lot of Ubisoft titles there is a config file with a streaming value. In the Ubisoft values I changed it from 16 to 1064 and it fixed it completely. I'm not sure if it will even work in this game or where that config file is for this game but it certainly seems like the same exact problem. What it ended up being is how much memory they allocated for streaming something.
4090: the new 1080p high refresh rate card
The game being cpu limited, hopefully they fix it, it actually should be more fps.
@@igm1571 No, he's getting 97-98% gpu usage at 1080p epic, and only 95-110 FPS
Today I learned that 4K DLSS quality = 1080p apparently.
what a dumb take 4K upscaling looks basically the same as native and far better than 1080p even in performance mode. And above 60FPS frame gen works wonders.
@@DragonOfTheMortalKombat 4K DLSS Quality isnt the same as 1080p, (The perfomance is way lower than native 1080p), so its a trade off, looks better, performs worse.
That's always been the way. The 3090 is now a 1440p60 max card or 1080p144 card
The game is using Unreal Engine 5.1, I believe, which does not support nanite for trees and foliage which is why there still noticeable LOD issues on Epic settings. I think nanite was added for trees/foliage from 5.2 so hopefully the developers will update the engine to a newer build in time so fix the pop in fully.
Thanks for the info!
This comment is why i pay for internet
@@metehan6490And porn.
Unfortunately upgrading Unreal Engine point versions is not easy, especially if you put in a lot of your own customizations in the engine.
They won't.
4090 is the true 1080p 60fps card of modern times
That is just insane, and still seeing game that has visible trees and other modles popping up, it does not even look that good.
@@PREDATEURLTagree
It runs at 60 fps in 4k at the video, what are you talking about?
But console player insist their $399 PS5 runs games at 4K/60. :)
4k 60 plus fps without DLSS 4k ultra. Are you stupid or what?
GPUs costing thousands should not be struggling for frames. The gaming industry has gone nuts, seriously.
This has nothing to do with the gpus. Sadly this is one of the worst (un)optimized games in the last few years.
When you think it can’t get any worse , they prove us wrong.
Better wait until they fix this shit i guess
@@DjMrMakaveli yeah I'm pretty sure that was what OP meant, hence he refered to the gaming industry and no the GPU industry.
@@ehdbomhe’s right tho. Gpus prices are insane
@@DjMrMakaveli you misread both OP’s comment and now mine.
@@ehdbom who cares
Imagine developing and testing this game on anything other than a 4090
K i am imagining
@@lukenevesHow many frames you getting, hypothetically 😢
Indeed...
@@venbeer don't think they did, cos I'm on a 7700xt and have zero stutter and it runs smooth as glass. All the reviews moaning about stutter are all people with 4090s. 😂
@@MrLilredmachineOkay if you think your 7700xt is better than 4090 I don’t know what to say. Im more picky when it comes to smoothness of a game considering I spent 1,900 on a gpu.
scared to admit that I watched about 70% of this video thinking the title said 4060 and I was wondering wtf everyone is talking about bad optimisation
😂
Running under epic, ultra or what ever, on 3060/12gb 5600x 2K - 100 fos average
@@VolodymyrMoon looking at the sky lol. This is so misleading its insane....
@@muffin0608 fr
@@VolodymyrMoondlss ultra performance?
Stalking Zwormz 2: Heart of 4090
Kinda speaks volumes if a fucking 4090 hits only over 100fps in 1080p, game devs need to start optimizing...
JUP another game wich i dont wanna support ^^ the developers these days are a fucking joke i have a fucking 7800x3d and a 4080 bro but still u cant play some tripple A games in native lul
Still day one maybe after 1 week the game will get better
@@SandroThomas-r4rah yes the devs that were fighting a war while still working on this game are a joke
4k at dlss quality is not 1080p , is 1440p , and this is unreal engine 5 , so don´t expect play it at 100fps with your potato pc , of course they need to optimize with future patches , but UE5 and also lumen is really taxing on hardware , lumen is indeed a form of raytracing , global illumination , by itself is very demanding , and still an rtx4070 can play this game at 70fps at 4k epic settings , dlss performance and frame generation enabled , wich is not that bad for a 500$ gpu
Worse is yet to come when minimum requirement will be dlss + fg for 1080p 60fps lol
one of the biggest problems with devs these days is they don't fake some things to let CPU and GPU breath easy so they import a bunch of mega scans and high res VFX and textures that sends your PC to the moon
4:41 is Hilarious... truly a gamer mindset
He killed me at that moment
Shadows does actually get blurrier and less detailed the further away from the object irl, but that flickering is a graphical issue with UE5 that they need to fix other then forcing the game developers to fix it for their project every time.
The shader cache size thingy.. i never disabled it before. me for now i noticed improvments to the games i was playing which makes no sense. So yes i am trying my best to get my computer running good lol u seem just fine i guess yea lol i am the one with the computer problems
You know what? It's probably the game's fault... I've been seeing it time and time again, optimization has gone down the drain unfortunately, and there's nothing we can do to fix it, even brute forcing it doesn't work because the games still stutter 😭
Getting a rock solid 20 fps in the first town with my RTX2060/R5 3600/32GB at 1080p/Medium/DLSS Balanced 😎👍 I know it's prehistoric tech at this point but damn...
To be fair your whole system could do with an upgrade, going up to like a 4070 and replacing your ryzen with a 5800x3d would be a massive uplift.
@ramborambokitchenkitchen6357 Yeah, I know, I mainly play on PS5 I was just curious to see how it would run. Though I mean it can still run RDR2, Cyberpunk at 1440p med settings with 60+ frames so it's probably more UE5 and bad optimization at fault.
Vram
3600 is still fine
@@epicgamer2670I guess we'll see about that. Even my 5800x3d struggled to stay over 60 fps in the first village
Surprisingly not using too much vram
UE5 has much better vram allocation then UE4
UE5, for all its faults, can have very good VRAM management if some features are properly implemented
You need the extra VRAM for frame gen, im sure thats what devs have in mind.
RAM usage is high though, probably because they’re using some kind of UE5 optimization that saves VRAM usage at the cost of RAM usage
The game is using 10-11GB VRAM once you reach the village in lesser Zone Area
I thought my pc was good until I realised that I barely meet the recommended requirements of this game lol
What are your pc specs?
Pretty much lol
@@jacobgames34127800x3D, 7800xt, 32GB 6400mhz DDR5. Most games run great for me at 1440p. Bo6 runs at 1440p extreme at 200fps. I know that my gpu isn’t the best but it’s crazy that I barely meet the minimum for this game.
Bad optimization bro,it's not rdr2 with 560 million dollars, but it's better than cyberpunk 2077 on start
I can run RDR2 on Max with no issues. Same with gamma on Max. I7, radeon 5700, with 32 gig ram and I'm being told will have to play on medium...@@cleiters4180
Really enjoy your videos mate. I myself have 4060 TI and your videos really help me see the detailed insights of how the performance of my card would turn out before playing any game.
man i waited for this game since the announcement... loved the gameplay... so excited to play it today..
As someone who saved money and bought a pretty beefy PC, seeing the "made in UE5" bs usually just tell me the devs are lacking in the artistic department and are compensating by using this buggy ass engine. It is not worth it. Imagine mid or low end PC users. This isn't SH2, you're going to need stability, smooth FPS, not the "inevitable" traversal drops.
It looks gorgeous though.
I think going for UE5 is a good idea.
Just to update it to 5.2 itd be better.
Original stalkers are played even today, very popular modding.
This being in ue5 will easily last 10+yrs.
@@prezlamen7906 It's a terrible platform, for people who lack artistic skills and want pretty assets. Every single UE5 game runs poorly. The best developers have their own engine. Even MH Wild, which also requires framegen, can at least maintain a steady 80fps with no drops on my PC (4080+i712700k)
It's very expensive to develop your own engine tho. Plus UE5 has tons of documentation and support from the devs. They've been pushing updates like crazy, but I do wish they would focus more on optimization instead of eye candy, but unfortunately it's eye candy that gets most people excited...
@@prezlamen7906 as long as there are gamers and modders, stalker 2 will live forever. Stalker 2 is everything i dreamed/wished for in terms of graphics. We already have 75+ mods that rebalance the game and we are only 2 days in. Its gonna be mods galore when official tools release
@Clint_Beastwood87 Exactly. UE5 is garbage but over time fans will figure out everything and itll look amazing 20yrs in the future too.
"I've noticed some poor implement of shadows in real life" Kryzzp quote of the year!
My rx7800xt is struggling to get stable 60 fps in 1080p, that's abysmal....
Wow, horrible game from a tehcnical point.
My 6600xt is dying as well my poor little 5800x3d is trying its best haha
Lol really? And i was expecting running it on max at 1440p with my 6800xt
Yikes. Guess I’ll be skipping this one
@@silverwerewolf975 maybe if you upscale from 360p😂
2200€ GPU = 60FPS @1440p 😑 this is another well optimized game, not.
They have valid defense.
They're in the middle of a war due to Russia being Russia
it got 60 fps in 4k w/o dlss or framegen
It's 100fps @ 4k resolution, do yall even watch the video? :D
It's at ultra settings. Of course it is hard to run.
@@ravioli-ravioli with dlss quality and frame gen, are you certain that's still 4k? really?
The textures are disturbingly high quality and cohesive it’s very lovely regardless of performance this is some art art
Tell me about it. Ive played all up that loner village holding the X button and going at snail pace.
Its gorgeous. Especially at night. I love it.
Cant wait for the weekend ill spend locked in my room playing.
but still nothing looks good?
@@svgeier After playing through lesser zone and uninstalling S2, ive concluded it looks ok but it looks like any other UE5 game, except thats all it does.
It feels more like a demo game, or a game still in alpha.
It needs at least 1 more yr, possibly 2 to be considered a released game by me.
3:01 - this trouble called war😥 Anyway thanks for review 4090 in this game!
Oh no. I didn't know there was a war going on in the Czech Republic
@yagr1 Team transferred to CR because of the war
I'd like to see some of these games tested with ALL CPU Cores enabled. Some games, ( like Microsoft Flight Sim 2024) actually utilise the no 3D Cache cores, just using raw number of threads instead. I know most games likely run better on 3D Cache cores, but I'd like to see how the games utilise a CPU with all cores enabeld and if developers are clever enough to make them prefer the cores that run better without needing to manually disable them.
One thing that helped me with my 7950x3d cpu is actually enabling all cores to go at full blast instead of just X3D cores. It seems to like more cores rather than 3D V cache
Yea DF already stated this game cares for Cache not one percent
They had 15 years to optimize this game. yikes.
Your comment is not 100% true.
bro do you know what is happening in ukraine ?
@@dalynzeras they moved to czech republic
@@what_t3h_spruc3 Part of developers are die in the war though.
The development started in 2018
I just found ur channel yesterday! I love the format of ur vids, very informative and interesting! Earned yourself a sub
People need to understand that UE5 is horribly optimized to begin with. Due to how graphically intensive lighting is, it’s almost impossible make it run better. People should just use UE4 instead because it’s basically the same engine just with worse graphics.
The graphics are the best part of UE5. The graphics are incredible but so are the requirements. Kinda disappointing how a $1,600 gpu can barely hit 60fps at 4k
@ UE5 is to ahead of its time. Graphics cards are getting more expensive and are still trying to keep up.
Unreal engine should just be dropped. We can blame normies/casuals tbh. All they seem to care about are le pretty graphics over actually good games. It’s why they love sony cinematic slops and games like RDR2.
@@idkwhattohaveasausername5828just like 2080ti times.
@@gorillagroddgamingRDR 2 is a graphical masterpiece from Rockstar Studios that even many 2022-2024 games cannot beat yet, And it's very optimized for how it looks.
UE5, on the other hand, is an attempt to get max graphic as cheap as possible. Yet many games using UE5 still cannot beat RDR2 graphical achievement.
UE 5 is causing bad and lazy dev sacrificing performance for visual. They better if with Unity as they also have those great graphic yet easier to optimize.
4:35 “I’ve noticed some very poor implemented shadows in real life”
I don't excuse poor performance (as a result of lacking optimization) regardless of how "graphically intensive" a game is. The development team underwent hardship, but this is still a product made available for sale in its current condition. This needed to be delayed by another year or so, and based on several initial reviews of this game, it seems that all of those publications can agree. It isn't 2007 anymore.
I wish that it was 2007
4:35 Please Kryzzp I think we would all love, if you went around some places in Portugal and talked about the "textures, lighting, shadows, view distance, and so on" it would be so funny. Maybe for April fools?:D
best thumbnail i have ever seen
At last someone that posts specs and settings
Awesome test 👍
Thank you 😃
And here we have the retro GPU king!
Nice videos man.
How many GPU's do you have in your collection? Wow😂
@@eurocrusader1724 he already said over 100 Gpu
He's talking about DanielC, he's awesome and he tests lots of retro GPUs!
Highly recommend watching his videos 🙂
@zWORMzGaming 🙏
As always the best GPU/CPU testing on YT there is! Cheers man!
Can you try this game with rtx 4060ti 8gb ?
vram too low, you won't get 60fps
Yeah DLSS + Frame Gen is gonna be an absolute must for me
im downloading it right now! so excited!
2:15 this spawn of tree is very cool!
4090 or pubg?
At least it's one of the games that don't look worse with DLSS Quality but get a major performance boost.
RTX 4080S in 1440p high settings 60-70fps with DLSS Quality 90-100fps.
So great :)))))
Will you bother getting the R7 9800X3D?
AMD told me they'd get me one when they have more review samples!
@@zWORMzGaming Lucky lol
I somehow managed to get it through amazon Italy for 548€
@@HarryLikesLambosIts crazy how I have that cpu before a reviewer. And I was waiting for 4090 content for a year already.
Always great to see that 4K still is totally over the top with the gpu power it needs
Yep, another one of - we didn’t optimize our at all game, upscaling and frame generation will take care of that
This is a worrying trend that seems to not stop.
Finally someone else understands the absolute scam of ai, ever since ai came out games aren't expected to be optimized and it's pathetic
I think you need Fullscreen (Borderless) if you want FSR FG to work, it did work on my RTX 3050 but the input lag was noticeable even at 100+ FPS.
Also, please enable NVIDIA Reflex, it helps a lot with input lag, I went from 100 ms to like 55 ms.
Please test with the rtx 4080/4080s when you can. Good video btw
I copy/paste my comment I wrote under this video, maybe it helps a bit: "Playing the game with a 7600x and a 4080 Super on 1440p, all settings on Epic, DLSS at DLAA with around 100 FPS in average (~70 in the first village)... Tbh, I'm fine with it. I'm still using a 60Hz monitor anyway. The cutscenes are sometimes under 60 FPS for a few seconds, but that doesn't bother me."
21:05 Lightning! near you, closer 20 meters behind you
This is unacceptable performance for a top tier gpu. What the hell...
Blame the publisher for rushing the game out. Post launch patches will likely sort out most of the issues
@@smittyvanjagermanjenson182 if a 4090 is barely keeping 60fps at 4k on launch, even 3 years of patches won't make the performance acceptable lmao
Wow...I was suspecting that you will be doing benchmark of Stalkier 2 but I did not expect that soon!!! I thought I will check today( 21st) lol. Well done mate!!!
bro i just want to clarify something is the rx7900 xtx better than 4090 if i don't want to play with rt, i have watched almost all your videos and came to a conclusion that only in black myth wukong it was a problem for the rx 7900xtx. and also the prize difference is soo much.
RTX 4090 > RX 7900 XTX >= RTX 4080(S)
Dudes huffing some copium or something. 7900xtx is equal to roughly 4080S in rasterization right?
No it's barely faster than a 4080 super but slower than a 4090
Nah, 4090 is faster in any way. 7900xtx is on 4080 super level and i think even faster.
No, only card that will run away from 4090 is 5090
Getting rid of pop-in sounds so much more appealing to me than better lighting and shadows. I'm fine with where things are at as far as those two aspects.
Why these developers having big excuse about optimisation?
They are in a war AND UE5 has always sucked with optimization
@PixelatedWolf2077 what the war in Prague?) did wsr started 100 years ago? Also in interview they said that no one knows better ue than they do
@hellsbells8979 Anybody can boast about being better than others. Plus, the textures along autdo like 99% of the games on the market.
Also GSC Game Wolf is temporarily located in Prague, nice try. It is a Ukranian game studio and up until Russia got daring and properly pushed Ukraine, it had been there. A dev or two in the studio has passed because they went to fight in the war.
@@PixelatedWolf2077 they located in Kiev, where is no sight of any war, and moved to Prague almost next day, when the war started. Yes one person of studio left to war. But I'm sure he wasn't main responsible person for optimisation. It just excuses. Before war they moved release day every month, and it even became mem , after war, they made this exuse as oficial. Btw first stalker was raw and not optimised aswell, so basically its a tradition. I just hate when lazy developers blame whole word, but not themselves
@hellsbells8979 However that's still in Ukraine...as I mentioned before. Also no one exactly knew how far Russia was going to push in. On top of the war is STILL going on.
When you are stressed with work and worrying if your family and friends are okay, you will also do worse with your work or projects. Anxiety doesn't help with that either. If Russia somehow happens to take all of Ukraine, then they wouldn't have a home either.
are you using 2pc for playing and recording?
@11:21 my frame rate is far higher on 3440x1440P with a 7900 XT in that area no FSR or FG. Sooooooooooooooooooooooo Nvidia has some fixing to do driver wise as does GSC game wise I guess lol big time. I'm for the most part 60+ and the area I mentioned It doesn't dip below 50's
True.My Rx7900 XT 2k, epic settings,no fsr enabled or vsync,240-160fps with fg.
@@pisoiuro3322 Yep nvidia just cant do this game right now.. ODD considering RT and all that is forced lol
For those who are using FG, please make sure Nvidia Reflex is on because it didn't automatically turn it on with FG.
4:46 i guess real life needs some updates😂
It needs a rollback to more stable version
The graphic look very intense but for some reason i watch it on 4k it look a little bit blurry😢
I already played 3 hours in one go and just couldn't stop playing until I forced myself to stop. THIS GAME IS THE GOAT!
It will be the goat.
Its a gem. Rough and in need of polish, but damn how good a gem will it be when it gets more polish.
@ definitely but atleast playable compared to yesterday’s disaster…
Ive a 4090 and it certainly does drop into the 50s with dlss and frame gen, it drops into the 40s in the towns randomly from 120fps. The frame times are all over the place. It's still remarkably compelling to play.
While I get people complaining about optimization but at the same time the industry needs to progress in graphics , physics etc , we've been stuck with the same COD looking games for like 8 years now. It's about time developers started pushing the tech a bit more which is refreshing to see.
It's both, it should be looking better, optimization complaints are showing that, if nothing is changing, clearly it shouldn't be running so bad, therefore the whole "why can't a game just be intensive" argument doesn't work
No it is an optimization issue lol. There are equally good looking games that require half as much raw power (Wukong; CP2077; Ghost of Tsushima; RDR2; Metro Exodus)
Game runs fine on my 7800X3D with 7800xt imo, high/medium settings with FSR Balanced at uwqhd i get around 70 fps could be better but with framegen its about 140-150 which is fine. Turn down shadows, reflections and lighting to medium and its much better
Kryzzp we love you ❤
Hello, please tell me what voltage your RTX 4090 operates at?
This game is everything but not good looking at least for me.
I don't know, but somehow it feels like an old title, which came out 10 years ago by the looks.
It has some insane looking textures and lighting imo!
It's Stalker 1 but better graphics, that's why.
What's good looking then for you
To me the graphics are mind blowing but maybe I’m playing the wrong games.. idk how to explain it but the depth in the game seems very realistic with all the shadows being casted
@@zWORMzGaming Yeah with 3-5 wooden empty houses and 5-6 trees amazing. How difficult to have insane looking textures if you have much less objects and gameplay like that
a ue5 game you can turn off AA completley, fkng finally, and TAA and DLSS is not that blurry in this game compared to something like gray zone warfare, why is it this hard to implement lol.
yeah the devs need to start optimize this game lol
Hi man, what are you using to monitor the statistics in-game?
Hey, Kryzzp! I just want to tell you that my father is building me my very first PC with a Ryzen 7 9700X, an RX 7800 XT and 32GB RAM for Christmas! I’m very excited to play Cyberpunk, Dragon Age: The Veilguard and Stalker 2 at Maximum Settings! I’m so excited!
Hope u enjoy
Congratulations
Swap the 9700X with 9800X3D if possible, might be difficult considering the stock availability
Veilguard?
You missing some neurons or what?
Veilguard 💀
4:18 bro ur using a 4090 and can't even get stable 60 fps what kind of excuse is that?
UE 5 is the excuse.
crazy a 2000€ graphics card: native 4k on epic just 60fps
And yet people complain about $500 consoles running at 4k30fps and the PS5 Pro running at 4k60fps, a $2000 graphics card can't even run the game 2-3x better, a game that is also on the Xbox Series
Those consoles use much lower graphic settings and run at dynamic or upscaled 4k, ps5 pro ain't doing native 4k 60 fps my guy. The 4080 super triples the fps of the ps5 at similar settings, digital foundry tested it in some games. 4090 would therefore almost triple the fps of the ps5 pro@@S3NSEI507
@@S3NSEI507 Except for the exclusives most of the PS5 games are not running at native 4k Resolution, while the games are unoptimized on PC people have this misconception that PS5 is actually running games at 4k which it is not for any of the demanding titles.
@firzokkhan6443 native 4k or not, don't forget the price of the rtx4090, 3x the price of a console, even if it uses 4k upscaling, it's still 1500€ cheaper
@@S3NSEI507 Well if you are going to use upscaler as a crutch then an RTX 4060 or an RX 6700xt can outperform PS5 via FSR and DLSS in most cases, what people are actually pissed about is the native 4k is hard to achieve in Unreal Engine 5 games, PS5 upscales from resolution lower than 900p in games using Unreal Engine 5 or other similarly demanding engines and it is not like I have anything against consoles as I still have a Nintendo Switch and all Sony consoles till PS4 but to achieve playable frame rate the consoles does downscales the resolution massively.
9:38 the flickring is due to nanite trying to scale the geometry
The developers have been living in Prague for three years now. What problems do they have in prague (czech republic)))))
Average russian hater😂
@@oleksandrrogozhnikov5525Average low iq npc parrot.
@@oleksandrrogozhnikov5525 А в чём он не прав? Бедненькие разрабы, сидят в Чехии и так тяжело им приходится.
Not everyone left, some developers stayed in Kyiv
@@thesuspect6168 You can't leave free country 🤣
3:21 that tree just popped detail lmao
They had an excuse.
Which one?
They've been making the game for 15 years and then, they promised to release the game almost three years ago...
and then they had an excuse.
does this game looks grainy and pixelated on your pc too?
This is why you don’t buy or even pirate on release. Too many bugs and unoptimised code. Wait a few months instead
Thumbnails are the reason I click on your videos most of the time, keep it up
looks worse than metro exodus rtx edition but demands absolutely insane hardware. lol lmao i ain't buying this.
Are you blind? Metro exodus cant hold a candle to this.
@@prezlamen7906 lol lmao you are blind, metro looks better, RTX works better, runs better. this hohol trash is a borderline scam.
High quality textures in a massive open world, no wonder why the game file is so big and pop-ins are frequent.
Does DLAA enabled looks better than None (Native) ?
Yes Bro
Great video, gameplay looked smooth even at 60fps, could you please tell whats your monitor?
Is it fair to say unoptomized?
What are the white dots popping on the top of the screen at 1440p?
the stutters are killing my immersion, i'll have to wait for a update
Which monitor do you use?
at 12:02 the 'almost' fastest gaming cpu on the market is strugling to get 50 fps
i'm still rocking a 3400g + 4070 with 4k60 display
the gaming industry is so so damn broken
either they optimize it or i won't pay a damn cent ( vnd in my country )
nice vid
I have a 1660 super with a Ryzen 5 4600G and when i get close to entering the settlements the game freezes for 30 seconds before continuing
Why haven't you done a 4080 super video in a while ?
This flickering looks like two different versions of the same texture overlapping each other.
If the cpu were to use 100% utilisation and max gpu vram usage. Would u get higher frame rate?
i have question , why u disable half of its core
Hey love the Headphones you are using what are your reviews on them
playing this on a 4070Super and the answer is frame gen for now it actually makes it way more responsive and evens out stuttering/frametimes for me at 1440p/epic/DLAA. Beautiful game though
What screen recording app do you use? For some reason I can't record any game made on UE. Nvidia just refusing to do this.
I use an AVerMedia live gamer ultra 2.1 external capture card connected to another PC, recording with their REcentral software
@@zWORMzGamingThanks
What a time to be alive, that you need 2000$ GPU to play at 4K max settings at 60 fps.
Kryzzp "this is a ue5 title"
Me: oh no...
So for the flickering textures I have this same issue happen in a lot of Ubisoft titles there is a config file with a streaming value. In the Ubisoft values I changed it from 16 to 1064 and it fixed it completely.
I'm not sure if it will even work in this game or where that config file is for this game but it certainly seems like the same exact problem. What it ended up being is how much memory they allocated for streaming something.
Cant wait to see once it releases on ps5 how it runs :D
Could you test it with a mid-to low range build would be nice to know
I play 1080p 144hz exclusively on my Asus RTS 4090 and i7 14900k. Best gaming experience ever.
are we ready for 6090 rtx bro this UE5 shit makes me depressing