Thank you Displate for helping to decorate my office! Use this link: displate.com/armchairhistorian?art=5ef632597e849 to receive a full 30% OFF for the first week this video is live! After that, the discount will be 20% OFF. Twitter: twitter.com/ArmchairHist Discord: discord.gg/dts9q6x Website: armchairhistory.tv
"George, the British Empire at present covers a quarter of the globe, while the German Empire consists of a small sausage factory in Tanganyika. I hardly think that we can be entirely absolved of blame on the imperialistic front." -- Capt E. Blackadder
I live in south Africa they colonized our entire continent except for Ethiopia and they still have our diamond in the queens sceptre which came from my country
Other way around, really. It was the scramble for Africa that diverted the Europeans from their time-honoured practice of slaughtering and oppressing each other.
But British is the biggest Empire in history and also the Greatest. France was the UK rival for centuries but when they invaded they ask the UK to help them 😭😭🤣
I believe it was 2/3 of the globe was under British rule with the assistance of the East Indian trade company. France was always a enemy or cordial ally when useful to the UK.
Guns baby, they're miracle workers. Besides, things were different back then, you cut off the head of the snake and the body dies, like the video shows, you Dethrone the ruling monarch and make puppet states... You get a colony
It is win-win. For now. Just not for us. China bought many UN Votes for a credit of how much? Not more than 20 Billion. In Loans. That is one heck of a deal for UN Legitimization.
@@tonit4233 It's Leopold ll. Leopold lll was king during the second world war. There's a thing or two to be said about him as well, but that an whole other story.
I'm African and I've learnt more from this video than I have from any history class I've taken. I like how you've also clearly shown the steady deletion of African history, especially in the West African Kingdoms. Thank you.
@@francisnwadike9505 I understand your concern, I really do. But I do have valid reasons for saying Africa rather than Kenya. 1. It's true, I am African 2. The content of this video spanned across a large chunk of the continent, not to mention the fact that none of the major events that caught my attention happened in Kenya. 3. I love African history, the only problem is that information concerning our history is relatively scarce and difficult to come by, that's why I don't really care what part of the continent it came from, I take it anyway. It was more fitting to use the term African in this context.
@@Anandaapologetics You missed my point. I was saying that our history lessons at school do not have any of this information at all and that's just sad and appalling.
@Tattle Boad In a monarchy he has every right to have slaves under the law. In America it goes past what is morally right or wrong becuase America is built on the idea that every citizen in a way rules america and that all men are created equal which means the government can't legally keep people enslaved
@@johnwitek4891 All slavery is wrong, and slavery was legal in America. Heck, the Constitution even contains the three-fifths compromise (see Article 1, Section 2), which is based on slavery. Slavery is not justified by the cultural or legal situation of the time. Also, Tattle Boad, the confederate statues are torn down because they honor people who rebelled against the United States in the defense of slavery. They should not be honored. Finally, owning slaves was not the worst thing Shaka did.
The UK. and Portugal have been allies since both signed the Treaty of Windsor in 1386. But in Africa, the UK. got heavy handed with there ally Portugal. Portugal claimed the land in-between Angola and Mozambique but some said that would derail Rhodes plan to construct a North to South railway through UK. African territories. In the end, in 1890 after the UK. gave Portugal an ultimatum, Portugal had no choice but to drop there claim. The following explains it all - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_Map
@@andreylucass Small but pretty significant, the German's controlled my country of Cameroon, which is almost double the size of the whole of Great Britain.
Honestly it wouldn't surprise me if Belgium takes the cake for worst atrocities committed on a large scale in Africa, although some of the more recent (20th century) civil wars might win.
The "chopping hands" thing was more of an African thing and nothing the Belgians did. African enslaved soldiers had to bring a right hand for every bullet they did not return to the arsenal to prevent the blacks from stealing. What the black slaves then did, was to chop off the right hands of their fellow men, to put bullets aside for an upcoming revolt against the Belgians. Chopping off limbs is an african cultural thing .. not very common in the West
Other countries: Sure, Portugal can connect Angola and Mozambique Britain: I'm sorry? I need to build a railway and I can't have it run through my oldest ally, I need to hold it directly.
@@tenko5541 no theres also an ancient city of benin in modern day Nigeria that had a long ancient lasting civilization till the British occupied it 1897 and burned the city down am Nigerian so that's the history of benin in Nigeria not benin republic that's speaks french
@@tenko5541 yes broh not only they burned it down the lutted ancient artifacts in the king , oba of benin palace thousands of it such as bronze casting which is now in a British museum stored there till today . But the city as being rebuild back and it's monarchy restored back but it's now on his past glory not as interesting as it was before the British invades the land .
TLDR; The British deliberated long and hard about how to ease tensions of the land they just invaded and decided on the appropriate decision of burning it all down
The quality has been steadily increasing over the years, this is glorious... Not to diminish the talents of the competent animator, but this is also a lovely channel to simply listen to while working.
British colonization of the Middle East French colonization of Africa Italo-Turkish war Russia conquest or Central Asia and Caucuses Would all be interesting videos
A caucus is when a bunch of politicians walk around talking, in order to achieve nothing (usually). Caucasus is a mountainous region on the border of Europe and Asia. I don't like to correct people's spelling but this one is my pet-peeve. Sorry.
When it comes to colonisation in Africa would mostly hear about Britains role it would be rlly interesting to see the history of French involvment in the region
This guy does his best to cover world history from a unbiased perspective.. he covers African nations that were around before colonization. Here's one video you can go to his channel and find more This is a video about 3000 years of nigerian history ua-cam.com/video/fMmkmHUAAO0/v-deo.html
@Tattle Boad The richest person in history was a West African called Mansa Musa, so yes they did pretty well. Since when was savaging the world something to be proud about? I take it you support ISIS then.
We should never forget that an additional victim of the British Empire was Britain's own working underclass suffering terrible poverty or dying in the army etc. Only a very few prospered.
The ethnic English had always suffered at the hands of the ruling classes, many of those in power were descendants of William the conquerors noblemen or the b#$tard himself.
@@dontgivamonkeyz the thing is , most ties to him were severed during the Plantagenets, in which they abandoned anything the Normans inherited from the Frankish Kingdom, including the French language 😅 it birthed the identity of “English” as we know it today (If you don’t believe me, try and read old English…) Surnames, royal titles and formalities in Britain are more scattered than any other country, and it’s funnily enough due to the amount of British aristocrats who died in war because they didn’t duck when being shot at. You know, to commit to the whole “stiff upper lip” tradition. The issue with William the Conqueror is that he simply inherited a vacant throne and was very willing to keep things the same. A Norseman conquering other Norsemen and Germanic peoples. Protestantism and the civil war was the final cut off point in which anything in relation to Rome or Normandy was simply recognition, such as the coat of arms motto or the Roman names for places. Remember royals married other royals in Europe in order for an increase in power (William of Orange)
Yes but their children and grandchildren reaped the benefits of the industrial revolution and industrialization, which was in part possible due to the stealing of African resources
@@awfan221 in part possible? The Industrial Revolution was solely the responsibility of Britain. Britain is small, sure, but they had enough resources for their own country’s industrialisation, and you can’t loot knowledge either.
@@awfan221 No African colonies was profitable.There only two exceptions South Africa where all the resources went to sustain itself and the Congo under Leopold
Jules Ferry is basicly the prime minister in the 1880s that managed to encorage us to do it, but in 1881 a great expedition was lost in sahara and we didn't attempt to go there for like 17 years. Anyways he was forced to resign because of a defeat of the colonial forces in Indochina (even though the situation stabilized after) and on the route to give is resignation to the president and angry mob of communists and nationalists almost threw from a bridge in the seine. (They even called him "the tonkinois" in the senate because he was obsessed with Indochina 😂) We the French are a very revolutionnary people 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵
der, obviously they asked the natives if they wouldn't ever so mind being a subjugated state to the French Republic. after a few brief interludes in the, er...discusions, the natives unbelievably agreed wholeheartedly they would like to be subjugated. after all they were the French, mona me.
Dude, just wanna say you're doing a tremendous job. Your videos are the perfect mix of education, dark humor, and on just the right occasion, righteous outrage. I recommend these to all my friends. And I don't even mind the occasional commercial!
Would love to see videos on every African colonizer! I'm curious how different the conquest and administration was for the Dutch, Portuguese, Italians, French, Belgians and Spanish.
Spanish activity was almost non relevant at all. Spain ceased to be important after the isabeline usurpers took the throne, then came the republicans and the commies and then Franco and, well, i guess you got the point. Belgians were nasty, Congo suffered under them. Dutch were almost as non relevant in Africa as Spanish. Italians were a bit more relevant, not as nasty as belgians, but still kind of cruel, specially under Mussolini. Portuguese were more of a subsidiary of UK. And regarding France, well, i'm not sure, but looking to how little they left i can tell they didn't improve Africa a lot (also supporting dictators isn't something nice).
Wow...the British had concentration camps before the Germans? I mean, they got nothing on the slums America created for Africa Americans, but still, impressive (sarcasm).
@@gypsyemperor7535 they were going absolutely no where and back to going no where. The tribes kill each other with the excuse of not my tribe, not my religion, etc etc.
Just want to say I love the visuals on this channel. The way you work the maps and animate the people is perfect for my learning style, and I also find it extremely engaging. Thank you!
Colonization from the African perspective. What were Benin's concerns in not trusting the British? How did different tribes and Kingdoms adapt to European technology and tactics? Who adopted European weapons and to what extent? That kind of thing. You could make a whole series of it based on continent or region, if you wanted.
@@privatebribert So true and always a lot more complicated than stated, take the whole concentration camp thing, a lot of the guards died of malnutrition as well, this seems to come from quite an anti-British viewpoint.
@@westay4924 yes but they have over a trillion American dollars that still belongs to Africa. Much of that includes resources, artifacts, and labor cost.
The seizure of Cape Town by the Royal Navy to prevent the French from denying access to India was no pretext. Britain was at war with France and securing trade and communications with India was essential in order for the British to prevail against Napoleon.
It was a pretext because the French navy was not able to compete with the British one. Napoleon's plan against the British was to invade England thanks to the control of the Channel for a few hours. The plan change with the Austria's déclaration of war.
You're right. Acknowledging history should be separate from attempting to "correct" it. Unfortunately our society is to focused on victimhood rather then victorhood.
@@daniellennon4275 It's not If you actually visited places such as Kenya Mauritius Ghana South Africa Eypgt Morocco and Nigeria and their cities they are pretty much developing
I have two questions 1. Did Zulus actually wore British uniforms when the fought the British in the Zulu war. 2. When you say British African troops did the British not include natives until the 1900s or did they just use white colonist for their colonial army. P.S I would love to see a video on the French colonization of Africa or the difference between how Europeans run their colonies like you said the British gave concessions to the whites in Africa and even gave local governments the ability to get natives in to the army and use local tribes against each other . While the French tend not to use local troops or give colonial territory much autonomy of fear of revolts against the French. I don’t know just something that I thought might be cool to learn
Yes. Colonial forces often hired local mercenaries and trained them in their ways. During skirmishes between colonial and natives, it was not uncommon for both sides to take European uniform or native weapons as trophies.
Your content is always great,I like that you are different in animation than others,it was always fun watching your videos and i never knew completely about the british colonization in africa thanks for this video.
Stephen Jenkins I was implying it was the British standard operating procedure to burn down capitals, such as the burning of Washington or the summer palace.
@Stephen Jenkins Are you forgetting the whole 7-12 year long war in the middle of the 20th century in which pretty much major power bombed a number of cities to the ground? the US quite emphatically... Was a pretty big deal from what I heard
I have an idea for a video you should do a video on the ‘Evolution of British army uniforms’ I think it would be a good idea to add to the list of videos on military uniforms especially the American and Russian videos Anyway hope to see your newest video and continue creating incredible history content!
I would love to see more exploration of pre-colonial histories of Benin or the Ashanti. I feel African histories (especially outside of North Africa) are quite neglected from a pre-colonial perspective.
It’s because 90% of Sub Saharan Africa was extremely underdeveloped compared to the rest of the world. So they had little history before colonialism. Many African countries didn’t even have written language.
Keep in mind people that the UN “no border can change” policy is one that happened within the last hundred years. You could conquer land back then. It was and always has been normal in the past for borders to change.
Papa Ice Breaker II yeah and it’s predecessor the League of Nations was founded in 1920 with the same basic aim. Stop nations from taking land. Clearly some nations didn’t agree with them. Refer to second paragraph of OG comment for the point.
Caradoc Ap Cunobelin The League of Nations was mainly trying to maintain peace after WW1( it obviously failed), but the main things stopping wars from changing borders are that (1) Wars take too many resources and (2) Diplomacy has just proven to be better for border changes
"...Whilst waiting for the reply from the Space Natives, the British Forces at the Death Star Canteen carefully considered the correct means to make the Food hot enough to need a Tray..."
@@pineapplefeathers Peace and love won't stop you getting killed and your trade caravan being robbed. They didn't spend resources to conquer places for no reason.
@@Philiptanzer Africans had ships and sailed to the Americas before Europeans, the difference is they engaged in peaceful trade with the natives wile the British tried to exterminate the native Americans, this is why Africans didn't make guns they had no interest in invading and destroying others, wile western Europeans use technology for aggression and chaos.
great video as always. Can we have some more focused ones about specific African countries? e.g. a more detailed look at Benin, and how that ended up as Nigeria.
Brits helped Muslim elites oppressed Christian minority, and Muslims elites protest to stop Brits leaving after US and USSR’s so called decolonization.
Any lame rock in the middle of the ocean that is 1 inch above the sea surface during low tide and is just a 1inch x 1inch square when above sea surface: exists The British: 👁👄👁
The thing is, in the WW Belgium were an ally by Britain and in WW2 they guaranteed the independence of the Poles cause Hitler was an absolute mad man who wanted to conquer the world! So your comment makes not that much sense
@@DjangoUnSkilled I fully agree, but I have just one question: Stalin also was an aggressor and on September 18, 1939, he invaded Poland and occupied its huge eastern part. In 1940 Stalin invaded and occupied the Baltic States. Did Britain declare war on the Sovjet Union? I can't find anything in the history books. ;)
Amazing job in covering such a long period of British invasion of Africa in a short video. Of course it’s abbreviated but informative none the less. More videos covering Africa would be appreciated.
@cammer thyme Advanced group not advanced race, race had nothing to do with it. Eastern Europe is a shithole compared to Western, yet they are the same "race"
The Umerella(sik) wars would be a start. My great great grandfather in law led them. There are photos of him in the Melbourne museum. I've heard what stories have been passed down and read everything I can about it. There are forts around and everything but it's all very hard to find.
Does anyone else feel like the education system glosses over this stuff? I feel like I learned 3 or 4 times more about the colonization of Africa from this 20 minute video then I learned in 12 years of schooling, and that's disturbing. The high caliber of the video helps, of course.
um maybe because a school curriculam covering an entire continent that is not the native continent is strange? Like yeah squeeze in european colonialism in history class is fine but expecting an entire detailed coverage of african history is ridiculous. It's like complaining you didn't learn enough about indian history, chinese history, americas history etc, all places that colonialism expanded to. If you're south African then fair enough it should be required history.
@@Squival138 "maybe because a school curriculam covering an entire continent that is not the native continent is strange?" that would make sense if it didn't have as much of an impact on the current state of the continent today. History in school should be focused on making you learn what brought the world to what it is today, and in this interconnected world, with strong powers rising in what used to be colonised regions, it would at least be good that those points are covered. I'll give you an example from my country (France): when talking about WW2, we stay extremely Euro-centric, and extremely basic about it. UK, US, France and USSR against Italy Japan and Germany is often the simplification of the war we hear about, the involvement of minor baltic nations, or the chinese front (Which is at the same time the least covered thing in the West and at the same time one of the most important event to understand how the CCP took power.) By staying focused on ourselves, we can't understand the world around us anymore.
British person sees Africa: I say, this place looks quite nice! 2nd British Person: It sure does, sir. 1st British Person: Ok, let's burn the whole place down. 2nd British Person while lighting a torch: ROIGHT
Fun fact: in world war 1, the boers under british control were called to arms to attack the german collonies. Unwilling to do so, a revolt almost broke out but was voted down. It's really interesting to imagine that the british would have had more trouble dealing with a revolt and paul von-lettow vorbeck at the same time.
Dankie/ Merci Firetube NL. The Ire also revolted and that lead to the Irish Free state. The Boers hope the same and it was also the Late President Krugers's word too. ...
You think you can do a video on the Barbary States and how they stole many Europeans to sell them into slavery? I'm from Malta and it would be really interesting to see someone talk about it considering an entire island's population in our archipelago was captured by the Barbary States and sold into slavery. Thanks
Great video: Would be interesting to see more in depth videos of the individual African Kingdom battles with d colonial powers or even inter kingdom battles that were influenced by the divide and conquer strategy from a colonial power
For those interested, I once read a book about an 18th century Scottish-Dutch explorer(Robert Gordon) who stayed with boers during his many travels. That little segment of South Africa reminded me of it, so I shall share with you some information I found quite fascinating. They were as independent under Dutch rule as they were under British rule. They felt nothing for Cape Town and barely ever recognized the laws that passed there. The further Gordon got from Cape Town, the poorer the farmhouses became. Where nearby farms had healthy families, thriving herds and great fields of crops, the most distant farmsteads were nothing more than a wooden shack. Families were reduced to single men or women. Children were hardly around. Their meals consisted of many varieties of dried meats, as they slowly became hunter-gatherers. As Cape Town grew more influential, the farmers migrated further inland. Some struck it rich, acting as little monarchs for those farmers who lived close to him. Close meaning less than a weeks ride away. Throughout all this there was the ever lasting struggle over territory with the native population, which was part of the reason Gordon stayed with the boers. Now, for those who like to romanticize the boers: Gordon described most of them as having lost any sense of what it means to be human. The cruelties they committed against the natives I shall not write down here, but I think we can all imagine what happened (In turn, the acts committed by the natives on the boers were equally horrible). Even the Dutch, who weren’t exactly known for their outstanding treatment of the native and the enslaved, thought the boers had crossed a line, and sent Gordon as an impartial negotiatior to try and end the conflict. Unfortunarely he didn’t manage to achieve a lot. The natives weren’t willing to give up their land, and the boers still didn’t want anything to do with Cape Town. After his several voyages Gordon became commander of the Cape Town garrison, a position he still had when the British fleet arrived. Because Gordon complied with British terms he was quickly seen as a traitor by many of his own soldiers. He himself was now cast out of society. He withdrew to his home in Cape Town, living out his final days amidst the artifacts, maps and sketches from his travels before he shot himself in October 1795.
This needs a little more context I think, but an interesting topic. As an Afrikaner(boer) and student of history I have heard of Scots living in the Republics and fighting for them. As well as a few Swedes, Norwegians, Finns and even Russians who also fought with the boers. And I know there were afew Scottish missionaries but I haven't heard of this dude.
10:04 According to my great gran I actually had two ancestors at the battle of Isandlwana one Zulu soldier and one English soldier who’s grandson son would emigrate to South Africa
Great style of narration & detail! Just a small request. Please add proper captions to your videos so a larger number of non-native English speakers can listen & enjoy.
We took some, we discovered some, we rescued some and we purchased some. Most are in the latter three categories and we're keeping the ones we stole too. We don't care how that makes you feel.
now about present day🤷🏻♂️🇹🇷 I will say this Colonialism has not ended..... it evolved. let me explain. before colonialism " ends " the west chose the leaders of countries to keep their interest in regions take france for example. www.ieri.be/en/publications/wp/2019/f-vrier/france-still-exploiting-africa and take me for example. i am from the middle east and here our " dictators" have been chosen by the west not by us and here they uneducate people Historically , economically and religiously because that's what sustain their rule and my country is rich ,but money is nothing for me and for us muslims in general and here we eat we drink and we sleep ( not me i always study and seek knowledge in all fronts as best as i can and am a civil engineer ) even the cattle eat drinks and sleeps. here🇰🇼 courrption is too obvious and we muslims are in phase one and that's " Realization " to be fully aware from politics to history to religion. and every time a Muslim nation rises the west is unsatisfied and want to overthrow the government. Gaddafi,mursi,Yemeni leader Salah , King faisal in the 70s ( he got assassinated) ....etc way a lot i can't go over them all. HOWEVER, before the Arab spring this i admit was not clear to all of us ,but after the Arab spring EVERYTHING WAS CLEAR. we now came to realize misery is built by the happiness of others and our leaders and boarders were chosen and drawn by the west and we must amd will over throw our governments and stop the western intervention in our lands. sorry forgot ( the western people have nothing to do with their governments in fact we are all slaves to this corrupted system we live under " capitalism " or communism both you use " banks" made you know by who i don't have to explain). now about "slavery has evolved" and this time it favors no race only one in fact 👃 and it favors mostly the dollar. we are born to serve and sustain the system and the system milks the life out of us and we gain " invaluable paper money " in return and sometimes we get in debt which is literally an invisible chain in the neck. basically we are living inside bank and the bank choses who succeed and who doesn't and the bank plays with economy and who built it? "the red shield" known as the rothschilds. our muslim lands are the battlefield of the super powers and when you say next time why refugees are in Europe ask yourself what caused them to be there? that's the correct question. Russia is causing the refugee crisis in Europe by bombing the Syrians and helping Assad to kill his people and the refugees are a toy to send them to Turkey and Europe to weaken their economy and make the left wing fight right wing start wars. Russia has an agenda and don't get wrong Russia, china and America/western Europe are fighting for their agenda to who rules who. all of them are trash. now i want to put it in conclusion. " REALIZATION LEADS TO REVALUATION AND REVELATION LEADS TO REVOLUTION " SOMETIMES IT LEADS TO A VERY DIFFERENT R AND THAT'S RADICALIZATION AND THAT HAPPENS WITHOUT BACKBONE. that's why people go far left or far right. because they are weak in character and btw left wing right wing is a toy for the system no matter who wins the system decides everything not the people nor the government. We muslims are in phase one ,but obviously Turkish people has finished phase three. and we look forward to unite with our Muslim brothers and sisters and no islam is not an Arab please don't let me write about it and Arab is not an ethnicity it's a language. the world is Suffering from western imperialism ( not the people unlike you we understand) most people walk with where the wind pushes them am not like that i hope you understand now.
"So logically they burnt it to the ground". As a man born in Nigeria, and with generations of family history in Nigeria, I must say, I love you, Armchair Historian... No homo...Ish. 🤣👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
From a historical standpoint, British Colonization is one reason why 2 of the Big 3, Pres Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, had a difference of opinion relative to post WW2. Roosevelt got Stalin’s support for British colonization and influence to come to an end. Churchill, who engineered Britain’s hugely successful role as one of the Allies to defeat the Nazi’s and Hitler, was subsequently voted out of office almost immediately at the end of WW2 in favor of Britain’s Labour Party. Roosevelt believed that ending colonization and giving independence to those colonies would likely end any chance of another world war. Skirmishes would essentially be internal, and not external involving multiple countries.
And what about the Soviet colonisation of the so called soviet republics not to mention the occupation of eastern europe.....the British Empire is a small thing when compared to the USSR...not to mention the bloody wars conducted by USA and support of fascist regimes in South America...bloody hypocrites...
What utter nonsense. Roosevelt wanted to end the British Empire for one reason. Money. So that the US could be the dominant power and force their trade onto the rest of the world. He didn't need to get Stalin's support. Stalin would want anything that diminished western powers and provided opportunities for communism.
as a Cockney pal's son explained to me years ago, "how we got an empire" : "spices? how much?" "que?" " *Spices* HOW MUCH?* " "que?" "get the guns, lads.."
Informative content. Would be interesting to see similar future videos on the Dutch and French colonial roles in Africa, and the similarities/differences in administration.
Did someone mention RHODES?! Episode about Bush War. NOW! Jokes aside. The story of Rhodesia would be probably the most interesting one in order to explore the topic of decolonization, in my humble opinion.
Thank you Displate for helping to decorate my office! Use this link: displate.com/armchairhistorian?art=5ef632597e849 to receive a full 30% OFF for the first week this video is live! After that, the discount will be 20% OFF.
Twitter: twitter.com/ArmchairHist
Discord: discord.gg/dts9q6x
Website: armchairhistory.tv
Cool! Does that include American Freedom?
Hi
Hey uh will you do british occupation of Aden/yemen (my country)
Tidies
later tidies
Belgium: don't look at me.
It’s spam.
Spam, Spam, green eggs and ham.
@@landonsorenson9278 i will spam
@@blingbling574 i will spam
@The Snow Nigro found the Belgium man
Britain: *Nice city you got there. It'd be a shame if something were to happen to it*
Antifa ***
a haha aaha ahahah a haha
WE GONNA TAKE THAT CITY
@@britishberet9255 **watched this as I send weapons, supplies, artillery to the boers**
@@byproductofcheese Boers*
@@stahlhelmturtle9822 thanks
"George, the British Empire at present covers a quarter of the globe, while the German Empire consists of a small sausage factory in Tanganyika. I hardly think that we can be entirely absolved of blame on the imperialistic front." -- Capt E. Blackadder
I see your a man of culture
I live in south Africa they colonized our entire continent except for Ethiopia and they still have our diamond in the queens sceptre which came from my country
@@octaviusgalacticus2253 then the British queen could at least visit south africa an do some hearts and mind work. Schools hospitals ect 😆
True, but in fairness to George, it was one very impressive sausage factory
@@octaviusgalacticus2253 i assume they didn't pay you afterwards or helped you with infras when you became independent
Wars in Europe: *Ends
Europe: ITS TIME FOR AFRICA
Germany: "Can I have a bigger piece of Africa Pwease".
Britain and France: "No"
Germany: *incoherent screeching and smashing keyboard*
Other way around, really. It was the scramble for Africa that diverted the Europeans from their time-honoured practice of slaughtering and oppressing each other.
@@emblemedfate4270 shut
Neck snapping as their heads rotate 180 degrees towards cape town
Funny enough that was what contributed War to start in Europe again... and also simultaneously on a global scale.
Britain: Bloody hell Germany is too big!
Also Britain: **literally had half of the world with france***
But British is the biggest Empire in history and also the Greatest. France was the UK rival for centuries but when they invaded they ask the UK to help them 😭😭🤣
I believe it was 2/3 of the globe was under British rule with the assistance of the East Indian trade company. France was always a enemy or cordial ally when useful to the UK.
Well it more closer to 1/3
@@yummyfuzz1 no it wasnt britian only had 25%
"George, the British Empire at present covers a quarter of the globe, while the German Empire consists of a small sausage factory in Tanganyika."
African country: *resists against the British*
Britain: "so anyway, I started blasting"
Unoriginal and stolen from this very comment section.
Mao LongDong
Wumao The Original tm is here!
@@Natogoon
:/ So?
is still funny.
Ooohhh thᥱ ᥱvιᥣ ᥕord Coᥣoᥒιzᥲtιoᥒ !! Nᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ρᥱoρᥣᥱs thᥲt ᥴoᥣoᥒιzᥱd ᥲrᥱ bᥲd ᥒᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ᥱvιᥣ ρᥱoρᥣᥱ, rιght ? OK thᥱᥒ ALL ᥒᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ALL ρᥱoρᥣᥱs ᥲᥒd trιbᥱs throᥙghoᥙt ALL of hιstorყ ᥲrᥱ ᥱvιᥣ. Jᥙst ᥲs ᥣoᥒg ᥲs ᥕᥱ ᥲrᥱ ᥴᥣᥱᥲr ᥲboᥙt thιs ᥲᥒd doᥒ't go foᥴᥙssιᥒg oᥒ oᥒᥱ ᥒᥲtιoᥒ or ρᥱoρᥣᥱ ᥲᥒd forgᥱttιᥒg thᥱ ᥱᥒtιrᥱtყ of thᥱ ρᥣᥲᥒᥱt ᥲt ALL tιmᥱs ᥲᥒd forᥱvᥱr ᥲᥒd ᥲᥣᥣ.
The original “real niggaz”
It’s mind boggling how a relatively small Island Nation like Britain managed subjugate an entire continent.
And more really.
More like 4 continents. North America, Africa, India and Australia.
rule Britannia intensifies
Guns baby, they're miracle workers. Besides, things were different back then, you cut off the head of the snake and the body dies, like the video shows, you Dethrone the ruling monarch and make puppet states... You get a colony
They're now paying the price
May the Queen burn in hell
British ship gunner (in Egypt): So what part of the city are we shelling
British captain: *Yes*
Armchair Historian: Britain was a cruel imperial power
Belgium: slinks off
France aswell
Oi Belgium, where the fak do u think ur going
Also France hasn't left Africa yet
@@foam3132 belgium didnt leave, Belgian congo...
@@UncleAlf1889 And that justifies European imperialism, how?
Belgium: Hold my African severed hand
"Bother" said Pooh, as he chambered another round
President Xi? What're you doing here?
When the Chinese president hears Hong Kong demanding rights
It is win-win. For now. Just not for us. China bought many UN Votes for a credit of how much? Not more than 20 Billion. In Loans. That is one heck of a deal for UN Legitimization.
Atleast, Chinese builds infrastructures in Africa while benefiting themselves then leaving trails of destruction by the Europeans.
China has also been a victim of colonization in the past.
Meanwhile in Belgium:
*"Bingo bongo gimme dat Congo"*
A black stain on Belgian history unfortunately...
Leopold III to the natives: gimme those hands
Congolese Africans: This is our rightful land and you must leave!
Belgium: Bongo Bongo Bongo I dont wanna leave the Congo.
@@tonit4233 Gabon gadan give me those hands
@@tonit4233 It's Leopold ll. Leopold lll was king during the second world war. There's a thing or two to be said about him as well, but that an whole other story.
I'm African and I've learnt more from this video than I have from any history class I've taken. I like how you've also clearly shown the steady deletion of African history, especially in the West African Kingdoms. Thank you.
African is not a country a we Africa are still making they same mistake just call the name of the country u from please
@@francisnwadike9505
I understand your concern, I really do. But I do have valid reasons for saying Africa rather than Kenya.
1. It's true, I am African
2. The content of this video spanned across a large chunk of the continent, not to mention the fact that none of the major events that caught my attention happened in Kenya.
3. I love African history, the only problem is that information concerning our history is relatively scarce and difficult to come by, that's why I don't really care what part of the continent it came from, I take it anyway.
It was more fitting to use the term African in this context.
I didn't know there was a library in Kumasi, Ghana. And people like to say that we can't read or don't have any written history😠
@@mikeantonin7580 my brother I’m white and do African history as study the information is there and there’s plenty of it your not looking
@@Anandaapologetics
You missed my point. I was saying that our history lessons at school do not have any of this information at all and that's just sad and appalling.
Fun fact: The zulu monarchy still exists today and still has power in Kwazulu-Natal
Ashanti (or Asante) monarchy also still exist within modern Ghana. The current king (Asantehene) being Otumfuo Nana Osei Tutu II.
@Tattle Boad In a monarchy he has every right to have slaves under the law. In America it goes past what is morally right or wrong becuase America is built on the idea that every citizen in a way rules america and that all men are created equal which means the government can't legally keep people enslaved
@@johnwitek4891 All slavery is wrong, and slavery was legal in America. Heck, the Constitution even contains the three-fifths compromise (see Article 1, Section 2), which is based on slavery. Slavery is not justified by the cultural or legal situation of the time.
Also, Tattle Boad, the confederate statues are torn down because they honor people who rebelled against the United States in the defense of slavery. They should not be honored.
Finally, owning slaves was not the worst thing Shaka did.
John Witek being a monarchy doesnt make slavery any better lmao. but fr the statues being taken down is ridiculous
Tattle Boad y are u bringing modern politics into this ur just ruining the vid
Something about Germany in Africa would be cool, especially in East and South-West Africa. Portugal would be another interesting one
yeh Germany would be interesting as they are a fairly new country in relative terms
Fred’s leg
The UK. and Portugal have been allies since both signed the Treaty of Windsor in 1386. But in Africa, the UK. got heavy handed with there ally Portugal. Portugal claimed the land in-between Angola and Mozambique but some said that would derail Rhodes plan to construct a North to South railway through UK. African territories. In the end, in 1890 after the UK. gave Portugal an ultimatum, Portugal had no choice but to drop there claim. The following explains it all - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_Map
German presence in Africa was small.
@@andreylucass Small but pretty significant, the German's controlled my country of Cameroon, which is almost double the size of the whole of Great Britain.
Africa exists
Belgium: So I just started chopping hands
Honestly it wouldn't surprise me if Belgium takes the cake for worst atrocities committed on a large scale in Africa, although some of the more recent (20th century) civil wars might win.
The "chopping hands" thing was more of an African thing and nothing the Belgians did. African enslaved soldiers had to bring a right hand for every bullet they did not return to the arsenal to prevent the blacks from stealing. What the black slaves then did, was to chop off the right hands of their fellow men, to put bullets aside for an upcoming revolt against the Belgians. Chopping off limbs is an african cultural thing .. not very common in the West
XYZ AERO Stop speaking fuckery the west chopped off hands Belgium 🇧🇪 did do such a practice
It wasn't Belgium it was Leopold
jesse p “A king of the Belgians”
The level of detail within the "cartoons" is astounding. The accuracy of the British uniforms and firearms depicted is spot on. Very well done.
Other countries: Sure, Portugal can connect Angola and Mozambique
Britain: I'm sorry? I need to build a railway and I can't have it run through my oldest ally, I need to hold it directly.
But of course.
I found out recently that Mozambique is about to become 1st world country soon.Not related to what you said but I thought I'd say it
@@sampeckston6639 mozambique is sadly a third world country, it's more violent than malawi
@@elijahmonreal1027 I searched up African countrys that are about to become 1st world countries and it said Mozambique was about to become one.
@@sampeckston6639 it’ll only become a 2nd world country in the next 20 years, that is if China doesn’t interfere with debt
“This time with the Kingdom of Benin.”
Ok cool so they’re in Beni-
“Located in modern day Nigeria.”
*Visible Confusion*
Benin is just west Nigeria that speaks French.
@@tenko5541 no theres also an ancient city of benin in modern day Nigeria that had a long ancient lasting civilization till the British occupied it 1897 and burned the city down am Nigerian so that's the history of benin in Nigeria not benin republic that's speaks french
@@kelvincity848 yes I know, I was just telling joke. It's a shame they destroyed that city.
@@tenko5541 yes broh not only they burned it down the lutted ancient artifacts in the king , oba of benin palace thousands of it such as bronze casting which is now in a British museum stored there till today . But the city as being rebuild back and it's monarchy restored back but it's now on his past glory not as interesting as it was before the British invades the land .
The real Benin is in Nigeria, the republic of Benin 🇧🇯 is just a French colonial state that took the name of Benin
Now Africa is colonised by Transnational cooperations.
China mostly
jukebox_hero person shhh you’ll make the shills angry
Whinnie the pooh doesnt liked to be called out
western imperialism just changed
Hon hon hon
A Native American proverb says, "If two fish are fighting in one water, a long-legged Englishman passed by there five minutes ago."
Scramble for Africa be like:
"you're being liberated, please do not resist"
more like "youre being civilized, please do not resist
@Spartan 506 enslaved, don't forget that
@Spartan 506 not much development happend during colonization, Africa is still largely under developed.
@Spartan 506 not true
@Spartan 506 yeah cause steel doesn’t naturally occur, but they have lots of iron
TLDR;
The British deliberated long and hard about how to ease tensions of the land they just invaded and decided on the appropriate decision of burning it all down
Ezy win
@@60508 That is the most fucked up and best description ever! Nice.
Can't argue who lives where if there are no houses left.
my name ss not huts, but whole ass cities, which were made of dried mud, AKA, brick, which British cities were as well.
Not to mention they stole cultural artifacts
Britain: Hmm nice place
Also Britain: *burns the entire city*.
Jormangandur83 Benin city, Kumasi etc... Did you not watch the video ? 🤦🏿♂️
@@sjappiyah4071 woosh
@@ChestOfDoom how?
SJW’s..
@@toastysroastys7622 Because there was no city left afterwards
The quality has been steadily increasing over the years, this is glorious...
Not to diminish the talents of the competent animator, but this is also a lovely channel to simply listen to while working.
I do it too. I work from home and just put this guy on autoplay
British colonization of the Middle East
French colonization of Africa
Italo-Turkish war
Russia conquest or Central Asia and Caucuses
Would all be interesting videos
A caucus is when a bunch of politicians walk around talking, in order to achieve nothing (usually).
Caucasus is a mountainous region on the border of Europe and Asia.
I don't like to correct people's spelling but this one is my pet-peeve. Sorry.
Yeah, you don’t hear much of Imperial Russia, that would be interesting.
Or we looking for the colonial expansion of Austria-Hungary, Denmark and the Netherlands. I mean Dutch East India is a interesting part of history.
When it comes to colonisation in Africa would mostly hear about Britains role it would be rlly interesting to see the history of French involvment in the region
Yes especially the russian conquest of central asia
Honestly I would absolutely love more coverage on African history as a whole.
There are better channels for that, run by Africans themselves
@@unlockwithjsr give us links then
If you're interested in African History, I recommend you check out two channels.
Home Team History and From Nothing.
This guy does his best to cover world history from a unbiased perspective.. he covers African nations that were around before colonization. Here's one video you can go to his channel and find more
This is a video about 3000 years of nigerian history
ua-cam.com/video/fMmkmHUAAO0/v-deo.html
@Tattle Boad The richest person in history was a West African called Mansa Musa, so yes they did pretty well. Since when was savaging the world something to be proud about? I take it you support ISIS then.
I can imagine the only thing the US put forth in the assembly with the 13 European nations was to make Liberia off limits to European Colonization
Fighting for free slaves! (Or to keep the decedents of free slaves in power over the locals there...)
@Callum Morgan I'm pretty sure he's aware of that.
We should never forget that an additional victim of the British Empire was Britain's own working underclass suffering terrible poverty or dying in the army etc. Only a very few prospered.
The ethnic English had always suffered at the hands of the ruling classes, many of those in power were descendants of William the conquerors noblemen or the b#$tard himself.
@@dontgivamonkeyz the thing is , most ties to him were severed during the Plantagenets, in which they abandoned anything the Normans inherited from the Frankish Kingdom, including the French language 😅 it birthed the identity of “English” as we know it today (If you don’t believe me, try and read old English…)
Surnames, royal titles and formalities in Britain are more scattered than any other country, and it’s funnily enough due to the amount of British aristocrats who died in war because they didn’t duck when being shot at. You know, to commit to the whole “stiff upper lip” tradition. The issue with William the Conqueror is that he simply inherited a vacant throne and was very willing to keep things the same. A Norseman conquering other Norsemen and Germanic peoples. Protestantism and the civil war was the final cut off point in which anything in relation to Rome or Normandy was simply recognition, such as the coat of arms motto or the Roman names for places. Remember royals married other royals in Europe in order for an increase in power (William of Orange)
Yes but their children and grandchildren reaped the benefits of the industrial revolution and industrialization, which was in part possible due to the stealing of African resources
@@awfan221 in part possible? The Industrial Revolution was solely the responsibility of Britain. Britain is small, sure, but they had enough resources for their own country’s industrialisation, and you can’t loot knowledge either.
@@awfan221 No African colonies was profitable.There only two exceptions South Africa where all the resources went to sustain itself and the Congo under Leopold
I'm curious how the French did expanded their Empire.
Many military columns, with a solid administration to reform the lands conquered.
It was not easy for us, exept for Algeria
Jules Ferry is basicly the prime minister in the 1880s that managed to encorage us to do it, but in 1881 a great expedition was lost in sahara and we didn't attempt to go there for like 17 years. Anyways he was forced to resign because of a defeat of the colonial forces in Indochina (even though the situation stabilized after) and on the route to give is resignation to the president and angry mob of communists and nationalists almost threw from a bridge in the seine. (They even called him "the tonkinois" in the senate because he was obsessed with Indochina 😂) We the French are a very revolutionnary people 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵
Simple. French foreign legion.
der, obviously they asked the natives if they wouldn't ever so mind being a subjugated state to the French Republic. after a few brief interludes in the, er...discusions, the natives unbelievably agreed wholeheartedly they would like to be subjugated. after all they were the French, mona me.
I'd be really interested in some pre-colonial African history! Great video as always!
Me too!!!
Me three
4
Nothing like that exists!
@@robertraymond762 Wdym?
Britain in Africa: “so anyway I started blasting”
So anyway I started *burning
Spain, Britain, France, Germany, Dutch, Portugal:
"So anyway I started sailing"
3rd world:
"So anyway I started running."
Spiffy Gonzales Denmark*
@@ChanceKearns Sweden, Courland*
TurmutHoer wait did sweden go into africa?
Dude, just wanna say you're doing a tremendous job. Your videos are the perfect mix of education, dark humor, and on just the right occasion, righteous outrage.
I recommend these to all my friends. And I don't even mind the occasional commercial!
Would love to see videos on every African colonizer! I'm curious how different the conquest and administration was for the Dutch, Portuguese, Italians, French, Belgians and Spanish.
Yh, it will be great.
they'll only show the british ones sadly, people pissed off that they said no to slavery
Spanish activity was almost non relevant at all. Spain ceased to be important after the isabeline usurpers took the throne, then came the republicans and the commies and then Franco and, well, i guess you got the point. Belgians were nasty, Congo suffered under them. Dutch were almost as non relevant in Africa as Spanish. Italians were a bit more relevant, not as nasty as belgians, but still kind of cruel, specially under Mussolini. Portuguese were more of a subsidiary of UK. And regarding France, well, i'm not sure, but looking to how little they left i can tell they didn't improve Africa a lot (also supporting dictators isn't something nice).
Wow...the British had concentration camps before the Germans? I mean, they got nothing on the slums America created for Africa Americans, but still, impressive (sarcasm).
@@williamyoung9401 Yes they were the inventors
Continents: *Exists*
Europeans: HIPITY HOPITY YOUR CONTINENT IS NOW MY PROPERTY
Britain:did you mean mine
@@Bruh-hq1hx Portuguese : No, he said mine
@Bunyamin Esen russia: *no no mine*
@@kermitthefrog7425 Spain: definitely mine
@@stephen9381 Italy : obviusly mine.
Britian in Africa: “so basically I burnt everything down”
so anyway, I start blasting
It’s free real estate
And they also burnt down all the knowledge Africans had that could have helped the world evolve much faster
@@Amani-zo8ic literally stone age
@@gypsyemperor7535 they were going absolutely no where and back to going no where. The tribes kill each other with the excuse of not my tribe, not my religion, etc etc.
Just want to say I love the visuals on this channel. The way you work the maps and animate the people is perfect for my learning style, and I also find it extremely engaging. Thank you!
The production quality of this video is just unreal. Such an amazing piece of educational entertainment. And for free? You guys are incredible.
Historians: the apartheid in South Africa and Rhodesia was horrible, but why didn’t it happen in the other colonies?
Boers: hmmmmm. No clue sorry.
He should do a video on that.
GopnikRaptor that’s what he briefly mentioned at the end
Aspen Lovelock yeah that is true and it would be interesting if the armchair historian did a video about the apartheid era
It did. It happened quite a lot in Australia too. Just read about the White Australia policy
Yes man
Colonization from the African perspective. What were Benin's concerns in not trusting the British? How did different tribes and Kingdoms adapt to European technology and tactics? Who adopted European weapons and to what extent? That kind of thing. You could make a whole series of it based on continent or region, if you wanted.
Benin: not in Benin
British war crimes were worse than the nazis.... And they are the one who lectures world on human rights ..... How hypocritic
hard to do that when they all got killed, enslaved and cities destroyed
@@born2win50 if that was true no black people will be left alive today, much less over 1 billion
I am shitting your pants
This channel has becomed one of my all-time favorites.
“The Ashanti king turned Mcarthy’s skull into a gold rimmed drinking Cup that he would drink out of for years to come.” Damn that’s brutal
Yeah...but it would make for a hell of a cup
Not nearly as brutal as the subjugation of an entire race of native people, it does make for a blinged-out pimp cup though lol
And when he was later killed, his wife led a second rebellion m she was even crazier
@@danielc9967 "There's nothing more terrifying than a hearthbroken woman"
Yeah that's pretty cool.
Almost 100 years of history explained in 20 minutes. Well done.
And in more detail than I have seen
But factually wrong so many times
@@privatebribert So true and always a lot more complicated than stated, take the whole concentration camp thing, a lot of the guards died of malnutrition as well, this seems to come from quite an anti-British viewpoint.
Ooohhh thᥱ ᥱvιᥣ ᥕord Coᥣoᥒιzᥲtιoᥒ !! Nᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ρᥱoρᥣᥱs thᥲt ᥴoᥣoᥒιzᥱd ᥲrᥱ bᥲd ᥒᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ᥱvιᥣ ρᥱoρᥣᥱ, rιght ? OK thᥱᥒ ALL ᥒᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ALL ρᥱoρᥣᥱs ᥲᥒd trιbᥱs throᥙghoᥙt ALL of hιstorყ ᥲrᥱ ᥱvιᥣ. Jᥙst ᥲs ᥣoᥒg ᥲs ᥕᥱ ᥲrᥱ ᥴᥣᥱᥲr ᥲboᥙt thιs ᥲᥒd doᥒ't go foᥴᥙssιᥒg oᥒ oᥒᥱ ᥒᥲtιoᥒ or ρᥱoρᥣᥱ ᥲᥒd forgᥱttιᥒg thᥱ ᥱᥒtιrᥱtყ of thᥱ ρᥣᥲᥒᥱt ᥲt ALL tιmᥱs ᥲᥒd forᥱvᥱr ᥲᥒd ᥲᥣᥣ.
@@tomasdawe9379 It's entirely anti-British ha.
Animation just adds understanding to many of us visual learners. Thank you so much.
France and Britain: **Suddenly Stops Fighting**
Africa: _Tortured Screaming_
@Joshua Payne True. But they still have the most foreign territories out of any nation.
@Joshua Payne they're still more powerful than any african nation though...
@@westay4924 that's not saying much since they stole from Africa...
@@MasterGamer-qo3rx donated back 10s of billions
@@westay4924 yes but they have over a trillion American dollars that still belongs to Africa. Much of that includes resources, artifacts, and labor cost.
The seizure of Cape Town by the Royal Navy to prevent the French from denying access to India was no pretext. Britain was at war with France and securing trade and communications with India was essential in order for the British to prevail against Napoleon.
@@HerewardWake The French conquered the Dutch, Napoleon's brother became their king.. So yes, they seized control over the Dutch xD
It was a pretext because the French navy was not able to compete with the British one. Napoleon's plan against the British was to invade England thanks to the control of the Channel for a few hours.
The plan change with the Austria's déclaration of war.
I dunno man, living in RSA, I don't really feel like this country's getting better in recent years, if anything civil war feels more likely
You're right. Acknowledging history should be separate from attempting to "correct" it. Unfortunately our society is to focused on victimhood rather then victorhood.
Better for 90% of the country
What is RSA
@@charlie7531 Republic of South Africa
@@charlie7531 Republic Of South Africa
The British to a Africa:
”Look at me, I am the captain now”
Oh how the turn tables
@Eric 23 Europe? I think you spelled socialists wrong...
Marty Ollier *Laughs in Soviet*
Marty Ollier
You’re so f u n n y and b r a v e for saying that! Thanks for s l a y i n g those damn l i b e r a l s you absolute knob.
Harry Paul six hundred, actually
Next can you do the French colonization of Africa
I feel like Africa is often a forgotten continent. Some more videos, maybe on more modern developments there would be really interesting.
Liam R modern developments in africa 😂😂😂😂
Daniel Lennon Let me guess, you still think all of Africa is starving in mud huts and waving spears around in the sun?
Thomas Jayden yes, and?
@@daniellennon4275 It's not If you actually visited places such as Kenya Mauritius Ghana South Africa Eypgt Morocco and Nigeria and their cities they are pretty much developing
How can you forget the fucking massive company that bassically blocks asia's passage west
"Nooo you cant just colonize everything you see!"
UK:haha tiny island goes brrrrr
PHONOGRAPH that’s a horrible way of looking at things. Unless that’s a quote that I’ve just never heard
@PHONOGRAPH Astronaut looking at Earth: "wait it's all Britain" Astronaut 2 points gun at Astronaut: "it always has been"
@Michael Terrell II Yes.
@A1 💝
Michael Terrell II so you’re crying over a joke, even worse
I have two questions
1. Did Zulus actually wore British uniforms when the fought the British in the Zulu war.
2. When you say British African troops did the British not include natives until the 1900s or did they just use white colonist for their colonial army.
P.S I would love to see a video on the French colonization of Africa or the difference between how Europeans run their colonies like you said the British gave concessions to the whites in Africa and even gave local governments the ability to get natives in to the army and use local tribes against each other . While the French tend not to use local troops or give colonial territory much autonomy of fear of revolts against the French. I don’t know just something that I thought might be cool to learn
How
The french extensively used native troops, look up the Zouaves
Check out the west african squadron on google
Probably African natives, colonial troops were pretty commonly used by European powers.
Yes. Colonial forces often hired local mercenaries and trained them in their ways.
During skirmishes between colonial and natives, it was not uncommon for both sides to take European uniform or native weapons as trophies.
Great work. Thank you for publishing it.
Your content is always great,I like that you are different in animation than others,it was always fun watching your videos and i never knew completely about the british colonization in africa thanks for this video.
“and burnt it to the ground...” Yes that’s just SOP, ask the Americans or the Chinese.
The British and French burnt things that no Europeans understood until the late 1800s. It could have been world changing
In short UK and France just love burning houses and other crap...
The British and French burned each others nations for centuries before they went to Africa.
Stephen Jenkins I was implying it was the British standard operating procedure to burn down capitals, such as the burning of Washington or the summer palace.
@Stephen Jenkins Are you forgetting the whole 7-12 year long war in the middle of the 20th century in which pretty much major power bombed a number of cities to the ground? the US quite emphatically... Was a pretty big deal from what I heard
These graphics are on another level
I have an idea for a video
you should do a video on the ‘Evolution of British army uniforms’ I think it would be a good idea to add to the list of videos on military uniforms especially the American and Russian videos
Anyway hope to see your newest video and continue creating incredible history content!
Good news...
@@theanglo-lithuanian1768 yes I said that months before they uploaded that video
I would love to see more exploration of pre-colonial histories of Benin or the Ashanti. I feel African histories (especially outside of North Africa) are quite neglected from a pre-colonial perspective.
It’s because 90% of Sub Saharan Africa was extremely underdeveloped compared to the rest of the world. So they had little history before colonialism. Many African countries didn’t even have written language.
Ahte You are a prime example of the ignorance that is produced when Sub-Saharan African history isn’t correctly taught...
Here's a video about the Ashanti .
He has many more videos about ancient kingdoms and empires
ua-cam.com/video/esMSfUMzDpA/v-deo.html
African history isn't as well known because it wasn't as documented and recorded as West European history
@@theendurance That and because the West has the modern world
Zulu: Has 4000 Native Warriors.
British: *Laughs in Martini-Henry*
Laughs in maxim more like...
MortRotu no maxim at rorkes drift and look how that went well
@@MortRotu I don't believe there were any Maxim guns in the Zulu War. Gatling's Maybe.
16:10 "We did it Patrick, we saved the city!"
Can't wait to do this all again when Victoria III will be released
Yes
Keep in mind people that the UN “no border can change” policy is one that happened within the last hundred years.
You could conquer land back then. It was and always has been normal in the past for borders to change.
A ridiculous unenforceable policy, really. The situation in Sudan is the perfect example of the failure of international law.
The UN didn’t exist before WW2 what is your point?
Papa Ice Breaker II yeah and it’s predecessor the League of Nations was founded in 1920 with the same basic aim. Stop nations from taking land.
Clearly some nations didn’t agree with them.
Refer to second paragraph of OG comment for the point.
Caradoc Ap Cunobelin The League of Nations was mainly trying to maintain peace after WW1( it obviously failed), but the main things stopping wars from changing borders are that (1) Wars take too many resources and (2) Diplomacy has just proven to be better for border changes
linlinö önilnil Nukes play a role, but no country is dumb enough to use them unless they want to kill everybody on Earth
Well done with the depictions of African soldiers and empires. Definitely better done than most youtube videos.
Except for the Benin warriors sadly. They had really some badass armor. In my opinion they had the best looking armor in Africa.
19:45 What do you mean??!! The continent is still bleeding from noumerous civil wars and facing a new colonizer: China!
It's more like it's still facing it's native inhabitants...
There arent that many civil wars unless you are counting IS as a civil war?
Dont worry the commonwealth will not let that happen
Armchair Historian: Reality is not adherent with my progressive values.
Me: Unsub.
@The Canadian Crusader but that was one war compared to how many countries?
Wow this animation is incredible! And it takes up the entire giant phone screen without having to zoom in and lose anything. Amazing 👏
"But we live here!.."
"Do you have a flag?"
"...Whilst waiting for the reply from the Space Natives, the British Forces at the Death Star Canteen carefully considered the correct means to make the Food hot enough to need a Tray..."
Hallan Crafer.. the French have one for sure - the white one!
the overall production quality is quite impressive. It feels increasing more like a proper documentary. Good job.
Africa: *exists*
Britain: So you have chosen..subjugation
They had just as much time to come up with guns and ships as we did.
Coulter ???? The hell is that supposed to mean? It’s because Europe was more developed and you know more dense.
@@pineapplefeathers Peace and love won't stop you getting killed and your trade caravan being robbed. They didn't spend resources to conquer places for no reason.
@@pineapplefeathers That is either some very dry delivery or intensely naive. Text can be such a limited medium at times.
@@Philiptanzer Africans had ships and sailed to the Americas before Europeans, the difference is they engaged in peaceful trade with the natives wile the British tried to exterminate the native Americans, this is why Africans didn't make guns they had no interest in invading and destroying others, wile western Europeans use technology for aggression and chaos.
great video as always. Can we have some more focused ones about specific African countries? e.g. a more detailed look at Benin, and how that ended up as Nigeria.
Brits helped Muslim elites oppressed Christian minority, and Muslims elites protest to stop Brits leaving after US and USSR’s so called decolonization.
Any lame rock in the middle of the ocean that is 1 inch above the sea surface during low tide and is just a 1inch x 1inch square when above sea surface: exists
The British: 👁👄👁
It’s actually somewhat valuable, EEZ is the best
The Romans, Saxons, Vikings, Normans and many others. Hey native American Indians - have we got a deal for you!
it's for british pride
Essentially; any such rock with bird poop on it
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Guano_Island_claims
May I introduce you to the island of Rockall. The smallest British territory.
ua-cam.com/video/7w1wxPoTGKs/v-deo.html
Armchair Historian:The British empire
My Brain:BRITTANA RULES THE WAVED
Britain invades a country
World: me blind
Germany invades a country
World: *WAR*
Every single time one nation has invaded another, it has not caused a world war. Except of course on two occasions. So it's hardly a surprise.
The thing is, in the WW Belgium were an ally by Britain and in WW2 they guaranteed the independence of the Poles cause Hitler was an absolute mad man who wanted to conquer the world! So your comment makes not that much sense
@@DjangoUnSkilled Britain also wanted to conquer the world
@@DjangoUnSkilled but before uk and prussia were buddies but prussia becomes big boy germany and suddenly they are evil
@@DjangoUnSkilled I fully agree, but I have just one question: Stalin also was an aggressor and on September 18, 1939, he invaded Poland and occupied its huge eastern part. In 1940 Stalin invaded and occupied the Baltic States. Did Britain declare war on the Sovjet Union? I can't find anything in the history books. ;)
Amazing job in covering such a long period of British invasion of Africa in a short video.
Of course it’s abbreviated but informative none the less.
More videos covering Africa would be appreciated.
Can you make a video about British colonisation of Australia? There aren’t many videos out there about this topic
@@kremepye3613 scandalous ! 🤣🤣🤣
Ooohhh thᥱ ᥱvιᥣ ᥕord Coᥣoᥒιzᥲtιoᥒ !! Nᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ρᥱoρᥣᥱs thᥲt ᥴoᥣoᥒιzᥱd ᥲrᥱ bᥲd ᥒᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ᥱvιᥣ ρᥱoρᥣᥱ, rιght ? OK thᥱᥒ ALL ᥒᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ALL ρᥱoρᥣᥱs ᥲᥒd trιbᥱs throᥙghoᥙt ALL of hιstorყ ᥲrᥱ ᥱvιᥣ. Jᥙst ᥲs ᥣoᥒg ᥲs ᥕᥱ ᥲrᥱ ᥴᥣᥱᥲr ᥲboᥙt thιs ᥲᥒd doᥒ't go foᥴᥙssιᥒg oᥒ oᥒᥱ ᥒᥲtιoᥒ or ρᥱoρᥣᥱ ᥲᥒd forgᥱttιᥒg thᥱ ᥱᥒtιrᥱtყ of thᥱ ρᥣᥲᥒᥱt ᥲt ALL tιmᥱs ᥲᥒd forᥱvᥱr ᥲᥒd ᥲᥣᥣ.
@cammer thyme Advanced group not advanced race, race had nothing to do with it. Eastern Europe is a shithole compared to Western, yet they are the same "race"
I second this. We had wars here that we are not taught about in history and is very hard to find information on.
The Umerella(sik) wars would be a start. My great great grandfather in law led them. There are photos of him in the Melbourne museum. I've heard what stories have been passed down and read everything I can about it. There are forts around and everything but it's all very hard to find.
gotta say there is nothing more alpha leader than turning your enemies skull into a gold cup
A porcelain piss-pot?
Sigma ruler
Does anyone else feel like the education system glosses over this stuff? I feel like I learned 3 or 4 times more about the colonization of Africa from this 20 minute video then I learned in 12 years of schooling, and that's disturbing. The high caliber of the video helps, of course.
Depends where you are, in Britain I'm still schooling and I've already learnt everything in the video.
um maybe because a school curriculam covering an entire continent that is not the native continent is strange? Like yeah squeeze in european colonialism in history class is fine but expecting an entire detailed coverage of african history is ridiculous. It's like complaining you didn't learn enough about indian history, chinese history, americas history etc, all places that colonialism expanded to.
If you're south African then fair enough it should be required history.
@@Squival138 "maybe because a school curriculam covering an entire continent that is not the native continent is strange?" that would make sense if it didn't have as much of an impact on the current state of the continent today. History in school should be focused on making you learn what brought the world to what it is today, and in this interconnected world, with strong powers rising in what used to be colonised regions, it would at least be good that those points are covered.
I'll give you an example from my country (France): when talking about WW2, we stay extremely Euro-centric, and extremely basic about it. UK, US, France and USSR against Italy Japan and Germany is often the simplification of the war we hear about, the involvement of minor baltic nations, or the chinese front (Which is at the same time the least covered thing in the West and at the same time one of the most important event to understand how the CCP took power.)
By staying focused on ourselves, we can't understand the world around us anymore.
@insomiablaze 1 There’s no need to sling around national origin insults.
British person sees Africa: I say, this place looks quite nice!
2nd British Person: It sure does, sir.
1st British Person: Ok, let's burn the whole place down.
2nd British Person while lighting a torch: ROIGHT
When Britain burned down the White House it was noted how reluctant they were because they thought it looked beautiful 💀
Fun fact: in world war 1, the boers under british control were called to arms to attack the german collonies. Unwilling to do so, a revolt almost broke out but was voted down. It's really interesting to imagine that the british would have had more trouble dealing with a revolt and paul von-lettow vorbeck at the same time.
Dankie/ Merci Firetube NL. The Ire also revolted and that lead to the Irish Free state. The Boers hope the same and it was also the Late President Krugers's word too. ...
@@harrynewiss4630 Interesting. Could you name a source? I'd like to learn about it.
Well yeah the Boers saw fellow racists in the Germans.
You think you can do a video on the Barbary States and how they stole many Europeans to sell them into slavery? I'm from Malta and it would be really interesting to see someone talk about it considering an entire island's population in our archipelago was captured by the Barbary States and sold into slavery. Thanks
3:40 Every EU IV lad knows the guy on the right
13:12 And Victoria II players this music
Great video: Would be interesting to see more in depth videos of the individual African Kingdom battles with d colonial powers or even inter kingdom battles that were influenced by the divide and conquer strategy from a colonial power
For those interested, I once read a book about an 18th century Scottish-Dutch explorer(Robert Gordon) who stayed with boers during his many travels. That little segment of South Africa reminded me of it, so I shall share with you some information I found quite fascinating.
They were as independent under Dutch rule as they were under British rule. They felt nothing for Cape Town and barely ever recognized the laws that passed there. The further Gordon got from Cape Town, the poorer the farmhouses became. Where nearby farms had healthy families, thriving herds and great fields of crops, the most distant farmsteads were nothing more than a wooden shack. Families were reduced to single men or women. Children were hardly around. Their meals consisted of many varieties of dried meats, as they slowly became hunter-gatherers.
As Cape Town grew more influential, the farmers migrated further inland. Some struck it rich, acting as little monarchs for those farmers who lived close to him. Close meaning less than a weeks ride away.
Throughout all this there was the ever lasting struggle over territory with the native population, which was part of the reason Gordon stayed with the boers. Now, for those who like to romanticize the boers: Gordon described most of them as having lost any sense of what it means to be human. The cruelties they committed against the natives I shall not write down here, but I think we can all imagine what happened (In turn, the acts committed by the natives on the boers were equally horrible). Even the Dutch, who weren’t exactly known for their outstanding treatment of the native and the enslaved, thought the boers had crossed a line, and sent Gordon as an impartial negotiatior to try and end the conflict. Unfortunarely he didn’t manage to achieve a lot. The natives weren’t willing to give up their land, and the boers still didn’t want anything to do with Cape Town.
After his several voyages Gordon became commander of the Cape Town garrison, a position he still had when the British fleet arrived. Because Gordon complied with British terms he was quickly seen as a traitor by many of his own soldiers. He himself was now cast out of society. He withdrew to his home in Cape Town, living out his final days amidst the artifacts, maps and sketches from his travels before he shot himself in October 1795.
This needs a little more context I think, but an interesting topic. As an Afrikaner(boer) and student of history I have heard of Scots living in the Republics and fighting for them. As well as a few Swedes, Norwegians, Finns and even Russians who also fought with the boers. And I know there were afew Scottish missionaries but I haven't heard of this dude.
10:04
According to my great gran I actually had two ancestors at the battle of Isandlwana one Zulu soldier and one English soldier who’s grandson son would emigrate to South Africa
British * some of those men were Welsh
Jack Williams they’re saying he was English
Jack Williams don’t forget about the Swiss guy who was considered a beast.
@@roses2122 Aye but he could've been welsh
@@saxonsoldier496 Swiss as in Switzerland or Swiss as in Swiss valley? I'm not too sure.
I'd like to see more Africa stuff, please.
"New Africa" inspired the interest.
yeah
@jan bulíř Don't be picky. Watch some New Africa. It's pretty dope. It's a UA-cam channel, got a ton of Bloomer videos.
@jan bulíř European history is very redundant in my life from school to youtube I prefer learning the history of other places.
Great style of narration & detail! Just a small request. Please add proper captions to your videos so a larger number of non-native English speakers can listen & enjoy.
Never ask a woman her age.
Never ask a fat person their weight.
And never ask why Britain has so many artifacts in her museums.
We took some, we discovered some, we rescued some and we purchased some. Most are in the latter three categories and we're keeping the ones we stole too. We don't care how that makes you feel.
Dude, you should visit the Vatican
Its called WINNING
now about present day🤷🏻♂️🇹🇷
I will say this Colonialism has not ended..... it evolved. let me explain. before colonialism " ends " the west chose the leaders of countries to keep their interest in regions take france for example.
www.ieri.be/en/publications/wp/2019/f-vrier/france-still-exploiting-africa
and take me for example. i am from the middle east and here our " dictators" have been chosen by the west not by us and here they uneducate people Historically , economically and religiously because that's what sustain their rule and my country is rich ,but money is nothing for me and for us muslims in general and here we eat we drink and we sleep ( not me i always study and seek knowledge in all fronts as best as i can and am a civil engineer ) even the cattle eat drinks and sleeps. here🇰🇼 courrption is too obvious and we muslims are in phase one and that's " Realization " to be fully aware from politics to history to religion. and every time a Muslim nation rises the west is unsatisfied and want to overthrow the government. Gaddafi,mursi,Yemeni leader Salah , King faisal in the 70s ( he got assassinated) ....etc way a lot i can't go over them all.
HOWEVER, before the Arab spring this i admit was not clear to all of us ,but after the Arab spring EVERYTHING WAS CLEAR. we now came to realize misery is built by the happiness of others and our leaders and boarders were chosen and drawn by the west and we must amd will over throw our governments and stop the western intervention in our lands. sorry forgot ( the western people have nothing to do with their governments in fact we are all slaves to this corrupted system we live under " capitalism " or communism both you use " banks" made you know by who i don't have to explain).
now about "slavery has evolved" and this time it favors no race only one in fact 👃 and it favors mostly the dollar. we are born to serve and sustain the system and the system milks the life out of us and we gain " invaluable paper money " in return and sometimes we get in debt which is literally an invisible chain in the neck. basically we are living inside bank and the bank choses who succeed and who doesn't and the bank plays with economy and who built it? "the red shield" known as the rothschilds.
our muslim lands are the battlefield of the super powers and when you say next time why refugees are in Europe ask yourself what caused them to be there? that's the correct question.
Russia is causing the refugee crisis in Europe by bombing the Syrians and helping Assad to kill his people and the refugees are a toy to send them to Turkey and Europe to weaken their economy and make the left wing fight right wing start wars. Russia has an agenda and don't get wrong Russia, china and America/western Europe are fighting for their agenda to who rules who. all of them are trash.
now i want to put it in conclusion. " REALIZATION LEADS TO REVALUATION AND REVELATION LEADS TO REVOLUTION " SOMETIMES IT LEADS TO A VERY DIFFERENT R AND THAT'S RADICALIZATION AND THAT HAPPENS WITHOUT BACKBONE. that's why people go far left or far right. because they are weak in character and btw left wing right wing is a toy for the system no matter who wins the system decides everything not the people nor the government.
We muslims are in phase one ,but obviously Turkish people has finished phase three. and we look forward to unite with our Muslim brothers and sisters and no islam is not an Arab please don't let me write about it and Arab is not an ethnicity it's a language.
the world is Suffering from western imperialism ( not the people unlike you we understand) most people walk with where the wind pushes them am not like that i hope you understand now.
@@DillonONeil Winning is bad when Europeans do it. In fact, if we even desire our own longterm existence that is now bad. No problem, we'll insist.
"So logically they burnt it to the ground". As a man born in Nigeria, and with generations of family history in Nigeria, I must say, I love you, Armchair Historian... No homo...Ish. 🤣👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
From a historical standpoint, British Colonization is one reason why 2 of the Big 3, Pres Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, had a difference of opinion relative to post WW2. Roosevelt got Stalin’s support for British colonization and influence to come to an end. Churchill, who engineered Britain’s hugely successful role as one of the Allies to defeat the Nazi’s and Hitler, was subsequently voted out of office almost immediately at the end of WW2 in favor of Britain’s Labour Party. Roosevelt believed that ending colonization and giving independence to those colonies would likely end any chance of another world war. Skirmishes would essentially be internal, and not external involving multiple countries.
And what about the Soviet colonisation of the so called soviet republics not to mention the occupation of eastern europe.....the British Empire is a small thing when compared to the USSR...not to mention the bloody wars conducted by USA and support of fascist regimes in South America...bloody hypocrites...
Ronald Ellis All that doesn’t dilute my point in the least.
What utter nonsense. Roosevelt wanted to end the British Empire for one reason. Money. So that the US could be the dominant power and force their trade onto the rest of the world. He didn't need to get Stalin's support. Stalin would want anything that diminished western powers and provided opportunities for communism.
“None of the African representatives were present” what a surprise!
"Do you see that part of Africa? It is mine now."
Probably Britain or something.
That’s why it’s called Great Britain
Ooohhh thᥱ ᥱvιᥣ ᥕord Coᥣoᥒιzᥲtιoᥒ !! Nᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ρᥱoρᥣᥱs thᥲt ᥴoᥣoᥒιzᥱd ᥲrᥱ bᥲd ᥒᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ᥱvιᥣ ρᥱoρᥣᥱ, rιght ? OK thᥱᥒ ALL ᥒᥲtιoᥒs ᥲᥒd ALL ρᥱoρᥣᥱs ᥲᥒd trιbᥱs throᥙghoᥙt ALL of hιstorყ ᥲrᥱ ᥱvιᥣ. Jᥙst ᥲs ᥣoᥒg ᥲs ᥕᥱ ᥲrᥱ ᥴᥣᥱᥲr ᥲboᥙt thιs ᥲᥒd doᥒ't go foᥴᥙssιᥒg oᥒ oᥒᥱ ᥒᥲtιoᥒ or ρᥱoρᥣᥱ ᥲᥒd forgᥱttιᥒg thᥱ ᥱᥒtιrᥱtყ of thᥱ ρᥣᥲᥒᥱt ᥲt ALL tιmᥱs ᥲᥒd forᥱvᥱr ᥲᥒd ᥲᥣᥣ.
Never ever mess with a guy called Ashanti 💀
What if you wanna become a drinking cup tho?
The king's name was Osei Yaw Akoto
as a Cockney pal's son explained to me years ago, "how we got an empire" :
"spices? how much?"
"que?"
" *Spices* HOW MUCH?* "
"que?"
"get the guns, lads.."
*bang*
Nice place you got here. Love the decor.
Anyway on with the demolition.
They should rename this "British Burning of Native African Cities "
hey Sweden, how are things up there?
What do we rename the forced white settlement of America? Nice land can we borrow it?
@Rusto glad you learned how to spell "mud" correctly before you dropped out of school lol
@Rusto What do you mean they didn’t have the wheel? Of course they did
Informative content. Would be interesting to see similar future videos on the Dutch and French colonial roles in Africa, and the similarities/differences in administration.
Did someone mention RHODES?! Episode about Bush War. NOW!
Jokes aside.
The story of Rhodesia would be probably the most interesting one in order to explore the topic of decolonization, in my humble opinion.
That video would definitely get demonitized
@@raphuscucullatus7845 Like any other video depicting historical events (especially warfare) as they were. Sad but true.
Rhodisans never die intensifies....
Five Romeo Romeo does some excellent videos on his time in the bush war.
@@biggestred1061 I agree, his channel deserves more views
British soldiers: Ah such a nice city with intricate architecture
*I'll burn it*
Japan Empire: *lol*
I didn't know mud huts were considered intricate.
@@myrealnamewontfi7289 Really right wing haha you're making yourself look bad.
I mean, what else would you do? Keep it!?
@@afrohighborn262 You are alling him " right wing" because you simply don't like what he said?
Man I'm proud of this channel. Seeing it grow and evolve. These animations are top notch and the quality of the videos is amazing. KEEP IT UP!!!
Nobody:
Britain: Hippity Hoppity Africa is now my Property
@Tattle Boad don't even try to reason this guy. He's made that same reply comment at least time. He spends his time offended.
@my name ss until Italy are it up on their second try
@@sep9365 Yeah, hypotheticals like “they would have loved to do it the other way” is a nice way to conquest, subjugation, rape and torture
I'm amazed at your ability to continually up the level of quality in these videos. Well done!