Airbus A350 vs Boeing 787 Dreamliner: Which Reigns The King?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 чер 2024
  • Airbus A350 vs Boeing 787 Dreamliner: Which Reigns The King?
    ===
    #fligavia #boeing #airbus #airbus350 #boeing787
    ===
    Airbus A350 vs Boeing 787 Dreamliner: Which Reigns The King?
    In the realm of advanced airliners, the Airbus A3 50 extra wide body, or XWB and Boeing 7 8 7 Dreamliner stand out as the industry's leading aircraft. They are both celebrated for their innovative technologies and performance, but they differ in design philosophy, range capabilities, and operational efficiencies. Find out in this episode of flig avia: How are they different and similar? And more important, which is the best aircraft?
    Airbus A350 vs Boeing 787 Dreamliner: Which Reigns The King?
    The Boeing 7 8 7 Dreamliner, which first flew in 2009, was designed to meet the demand for more fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly aircraft. In response, Airbus launched the A3 50 in 20 13. The aircraft was originally planned as an upgraded A3 30 with new engines and improved aerodynamics. However, Airbus soon realized that a slightly enhanced A3 30 couldn't compete with the all-new, composite fuselage Dreamliner. Consequently, the A3 50 evolved into the A3 50 XWB, featuring a composite fuselage paired with metal wings. Boeing, an American aerospace company, produces the 7 8 7 Dreamliner, while Airbus, a European multinational aerospace corporation, manufactures the A3 50 XWB. Each company brings its own expertise and design philosophy to their aircraft.
    Airbus A350 vs Boeing 787 Dreamliner: Which Reigns The King?
    In terms of cockpit design, the Boeing 7 8 7 and Airbus A3 50 are both equipped with sophisticated glass cockpits that are the epitome of modern avionics innovation. The 7 8 7's cockpit retains a classic Boeing layout, offering a sense of familiarity for pilots transitioning from the company's earlier aircraft models. It features a clean, intuitive design with large, customizable display screens, an electronic flight bag, and a heads-up display that projects vital flight information onto the windshield, allowing for seamless integration of information and controls. Airbus takes a different approach with the A3 50, where the cockpit is designed with a futuristic vision, prioritizing ergonomic comfort and employing the latest in fly-by-wire technology. The A350's cockpit is characterized by its sidestick controllers and a suite of large LCD screens that present a comprehensive view of flight and system data, thereby reducing pilot workload and enhancing overall flight safety.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 194

  • @ChloeHa-zu8uchloeha
    @ChloeHa-zu8uchloeha Місяць тому +12

    I’m a Boeing fan, but I have to admit, Airbus really nailed it with the wider cabin on the A350.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Yep, you see

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      It's great to hear such balanced appreciation! The A350's wider cabin is definitely a strong point, offering more comfort and flexibility. Both Boeing and Airbus have their unique strengths, making them leaders in the aviation industry.

    • @edwardwilcox6606
      @edwardwilcox6606 Місяць тому

      Both these planes will appeal in different ways. For some airlines A350 will be too much aircraft & will prefer the lower running costs of the smaller B787, as I suggest above they are not true direct ( although there may be some overlap ) competitors & this is backed-up by excellent sales & order books for both. B787 is offering terrific advantages to airlines over previous model aircraft in many aspects such as efficiency, emissions & comfort.

    • @roberthowell7095
      @roberthowell7095 Місяць тому

      A350 was meant to compete with the 777X. Not the smaller 787.

    • @neilpickup237
      @neilpickup237 Місяць тому

      @roberthowell7095 And the 737 was meant to be a short-range low capacity aircraft!

  • @anevaydau
    @anevaydau Місяць тому +8

    I’ve flown on both the A350 and the 787. Both offer a smooth ride, but I did notice the extra space on the A350.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Cool! I’d love flying airbus too

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      That's a great observation! The A350’s extra cabin width definitely enhances passenger comfort, especially on long flights. Both aircraft provide a great experience, but those few extra inches can make a noticeable difference.

  • @TommyRaines
    @TommyRaines Місяць тому +7

    Travelled several times in both.
    A350 every time - quieter and more spacious.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Thanks a lot for your helpful sharing

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Would you choose to fly again on the Dreamliner?

    • @TommyRaines
      @TommyRaines Місяць тому +1

      @@FLIGAVIA No objection to to the Dreamliner at all, just a preference for the A350 - for me the quietness is critical for getting to sleep on a long journey (typically between Europe and Asia). In that respect, the A380 is better than both by a long way.

  • @harrydiana49
    @harrydiana49 Місяць тому +7

    As an aviation enthusiast, I find it fascinating how Airbus and Boeing have different design philosophies. Both the A350 and 787 are incredible feats of engineering!

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Uh, but choose one my friend

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Absolutely! It's incredible to see how both manufacturers approach design and innovation in unique ways, yet both achieve outstanding performance and efficiency. Their competition drives the industry forward!

  • @Kylepham-yz6ri
    @Kylepham-yz6ri Місяць тому +7

    The range difference is pretty significant. No wonder airlines like Singapore Airlines prefer the A350 for ultra-long-haul flights.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Yep, the long haul trip

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Yes, the A350's extended range makes it ideal for ultra-long-haul routes like those operated by Singapore Airlines. It's impressive how much farther it can fly, giving airlines more flexibility in their route planning.

  • @benjaminrosabella
    @benjaminrosabella Місяць тому +2

    I had no idea the A350 could accommodate up to 440 passengers! That’s massive.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому +1

      yep its capacity has never disappointed

  • @joviebonita54
    @joviebonita54 Місяць тому +2

    That tail camera on the A350 is such a cool feature! It’s great for aviation geeks like me.

  • @macbieber74
    @macbieber74 Місяць тому +3

    The different engine options are fascinating. The choice between GE and Rolls-Royce engines must be tough for airlines.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      yep both are nice

  • @grahamrankin5557
    @grahamrankin5557 Місяць тому +6

    As an Economy Traveller, I have flown in both the Dreamliner and Airbus A350 (& btw, A380) and having flown several times with both, in approximately the same locations towards the rear of each aircraft, my perception is the A350 is more comfortable (but that may be due to Airline specifics) but the A350 has less wind noise at cruise altitude compared to the Dreamliner. To prove a point for myself, I measured the cabin noise in both cases using a NIOSH Sound Level Meter App on my iPhone which confirmed my perception that the A350 is the quieter of the two aircraft. Cheers!

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому +1

      No argument here. Thanks for sharing the app, btw

  • @grtitann7425
    @grtitann7425 Місяць тому +6

    Only in Airbus we trust🥰❤️😍

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому +1

      love A350 ✈✈✈

  • @EganThompson
    @EganThompson Місяць тому +3

    It’s interesting to see how Airbus shifted from upgrading the A330 to developing an entirely new A350 to compete with the 787.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      yep thanks for your feedback

  • @EduardoJRamos
    @EduardoJRamos Місяць тому +17

    787 silent but cramped with airline seat config. A350 all the way!

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      I love your cmt

    • @adrianbriggs7028
      @adrianbriggs7028 Місяць тому

      Not that quiet..

    • @widget787
      @widget787 Місяць тому

      Try JAL with their 2-4-2 seating, what the 787 as originally designed for.

  • @novaleeorabelle
    @novaleeorabelle Місяць тому +2

    The operational efficiencies of both aircraft are impressive. I can see why they’re leading the industry.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Have you had experience with both of them?

  • @REPOMAN24722
    @REPOMAN24722 Місяць тому +5

    A350 for me, comfort.

  • @lalainedc2m
    @lalainedc2m Місяць тому +2

    I love the customizable LED-lit cabins on both aircraft. It really enhances the in-flight experience.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your comment

  • @guidowinter2478
    @guidowinter2478 Місяць тому +7

    1:00 is wrong. The A350 does not have metal wings. They are fully cabon composite. The A330NEO has new shaped metal wings

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your feedback

  • @vladilenkalatschev4915
    @vladilenkalatschev4915 Місяць тому +2

    As a passenger I prefer the 787 over A350. The cabin design of the 787 with its huge windows are simply amazing

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Yes, thanks for sharing, many people like it too

  • @thabotshabalala7114
    @thabotshabalala7114 Місяць тому +5

    A350 for the crown

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Have you ever flown on the A350? please share

  • @masbass171
    @masbass171 Місяць тому +2

    Maximum cruise altitude A350 also FL430 or to be exactly 43,100 ft to accommodate flying in Meters of Flight level in China Airspace. I’m so glad to have a chance to fly Airbus A350-900.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      nice thanks for sharing

  • @jackson20qt
    @jackson20qt Місяць тому +2

    The use of carbon fiber reinforced polymers in these planes is a game-changer for durability and fuel efficiency.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for feedback

  • @ljacobs357
    @ljacobs357 Місяць тому +4

    I prefer the A350. It is more spacious and seems to be equally as quiet.

  • @guillebeauxpaul
    @guillebeauxpaul Місяць тому +2

    I wonder how much the lower purchase price of the 787 influences airlines decisions.

  • @nashalydo
    @nashalydo Місяць тому +2

    The difference in maximum takeoff weight is pretty significant. Shows how much heavier the A350 is compared to the 787.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for sharing

  • @bettydau99
    @bettydau99 Місяць тому +1

    Boeing’s manual control philosophy is something I really appreciate as a fan of traditional piloting.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for sharing your thoughts ✈️✈️✈️

  • @torbenhilbig4185
    @torbenhilbig4185 Місяць тому +5

    A350 competes with 777 NOT 787!

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      yep thanks for comment

  • @htschmerdtz4465
    @htschmerdtz4465 Місяць тому +5

    Artificially produced video, there should be a viewer advisory

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      ✈️

    • @theKhumbaguy
      @theKhumbaguy Місяць тому

      I totally hate AI generated speech/narration.

  • @jacksonhartlyn
    @jacksonhartlyn Місяць тому +1

    The fuel efficiency of these planes is mind-blowing. It’s amazing how far aviation technology has come in terms of environmental impact.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      They all possess modern technology, right?

  • @flyingdentist
    @flyingdentist Місяць тому +7

    The king is only the A380

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому +1

      Very well said

    • @hali5786
      @hali5786 Місяць тому +2

      100% agree

  • @gladyssmith30
    @gladyssmith30 Місяць тому +1

    I’ve flown on both, and while I love the Dreamliner, the extra space on the A350 is noticeable.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      yeah thanks for your feedback

  • @roberthowell7095
    @roberthowell7095 Місяць тому +4

    It is my understanding the A350 was built to compete with the 777X Not the 787.

  • @walterbakker2690
    @walterbakker2690 Місяць тому +6

    787 terribly cramped! Absolutely beaten by the fantastic A350!

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for sharing

  • @Perseus505
    @Perseus505 Місяць тому +2

    Not a word of the quality problems of Boeing planes.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      ✈✈✈thanks for reminding

  • @xkr510
    @xkr510 Місяць тому +5

    It is my understating that the A350 has a lower purchase price!
    I have flown on both and must say I much prefer the A350 flying experience. The bonus is it’s not a Boeing! I no longer trust Boeing.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому +1

      thanks for sharing your experience

  • @abinashpathak4814
    @abinashpathak4814 Місяць тому +4

    It's A350 vs 777 not 787

  • @lambevis
    @lambevis Місяць тому

    It’s great to see both Airbus and Boeing pushing the boundaries of aviation technology.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      yep which one do you prefer?

  • @neilpickup237
    @neilpickup237 Місяць тому +2

    Unfortunately for Boeing, now that some routes now need to avoid Russian airspace, the 787s reduced range has become an issue. Some airlines are now having to choose the A350 over the 787.
    I am surprised that we haven't seen an extended range 787 to accommodate the new realities.
    Or is it that their development resources are tied up elsewhere?

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your feedback

    • @joeking22
      @joeking22 Місяць тому

      Boeing is struggling enough just trying to get their shit together with the planes they currently have let alone trying to modify any of them.

  • @user-tw7hq4cp4m
    @user-tw7hq4cp4m 15 днів тому

    I recently flew the 350 on one leg and the 787 on the return leg, with same seat number on both legs. For me the 350 was quieter and more comfortable.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  15 днів тому

      yeah thanks for sharing your experience

  • @winifredemely
    @winifredemely Місяць тому +2

    The cockpit designs are so interesting! Boeings more hands-on approach versus Airbus’s automation is a huge difference.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      They do differently 😂😂😂

    • @Eduard.Popa.
      @Eduard.Popa. Місяць тому

      I will say the Airbus is more hands-on approach. Joystick drive is more natural and take less space.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Indeed, it's fascinating how each manufacturer prioritizes different aspects of pilot interaction. Boeing's focus on manual control versus Airbus's emphasis on automation highlights their distinct philosophies. Both approaches have their own advantages!

  • @ThorAU
    @ThorAU Місяць тому +4

    Your pricing is opposite. A350 is cheaper.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your feedback

  • @r12004rewy
    @r12004rewy Місяць тому +1

    The A350 particularly the 1000 variant is a stunning aircraft, offers passengers a fantastic experience, the 787 is certainly lacking behind in terms of comfort, range and reliability.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for feedback, have you flown on both?

  • @johnchristmas7522
    @johnchristmas7522 Місяць тому +6

    i'M NOT GOING TO ARGUE, A350 every time, Best airliner bar none! 787 questionable build as with all Boeing products under their present management. I can now book through a travel agency now that gives me the option of what Aircraft I want to fly on. Need I say more? Dreamliner? That has undoubtably the wrong name now- to many connotations

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому +1

      thanks for your comment

  • @hirokusaikaru6624
    @hirokusaikaru6624 15 днів тому +1

    I used to love the B787, but I now avoid flying on it, considering the allegations by the latest Boeing whistleblower.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  15 днів тому

      yep I can get that

  • @widget787
    @widget787 Місяць тому +1

    This comparison is mostly apples to oranges, as the 787 and A350 serve different niches of the market for the most part.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts

  • @jeffreydao28
    @jeffreydao28 Місяць тому

    The service ceiling difference is interesting. I wonder how often these planes actually fly that high.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your comment

  • @tungduong6536
    @tungduong6536 Місяць тому +10

    a350 is the best !

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      Surely! A350 is the one

  • @samuelpham50
    @samuelpham50 Місяць тому

    I’ve flown on both and noticed the smoother ride on the A350. Anyone else have the same experience?

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      same here, I prefer Airbus plane✈️✈️✈️

  • @lawrencepll76
    @lawrencepll76 Місяць тому +2

    The AHHH-350 😭

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      We're still trying to work this out 😮‍💨 thank you for reminding

  • @edwardwilcox6606
    @edwardwilcox6606 Місяць тому +2

    Both great aircraft & not true direct competitors so there`s room for both to thrive & this is exacly what we see. B787 has sold better but A350 was later to market & is gaining ground. These two aircraft will be around for very many years to come particularly if you factor Neo`s for each in the not too distant future....you can`t better than these two.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for sharing! which one do you personally prefer?

  • @neena0ewn
    @neena0ewn Місяць тому

    The choice of engines for the 787 is impressive. Both GE and Rolls-Royce offer fantastic options.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      which one do you prefer?

  • @AnneMB955
    @AnneMB955 Місяць тому

    Sounds exciting. Looking fwd to these aircraft. Brought up with an appreciation of flying. Dad’s apprenticeship years ago was with Qantas. At 68, lost count of the number of flights in my life. 👏🇦🇺

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  29 днів тому

      thanks for your feedback ✈️✈️✈️

  • @HoneyBeeAmrita-ip5fu
    @HoneyBeeAmrita-ip5fu Місяць тому

    The A350’s advanced computerized systems must really help reduce pilot workload on long flights.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      yeah thanks for your feedback

    • @JPB57
      @JPB57 Місяць тому

      The A350 has a conventional computerized architecture with one computer for each system (hydraulic, pressurization…)like the A320 or the B777. The B787 has a complete new architecture with 2 powerful core computers having two channels each one and receiving datas from every system (with its own software card).
      For that, the B787 is one step ahead. Concerning workload, in case of abnormal situation, on the Boeing, there is no cascade of failures coming up on the EICAS like the Airbus

  • @timbaugh4034
    @timbaugh4034 Місяць тому +1

    The Airbus A350 is my choice because the A350 has more to offer.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      yep thanks for your comment

  • @Psi-Storm
    @Psi-Storm Місяць тому +1

    Comparing the flat airplane cost between the two doesn't make sense, since the A350 carries more stuff. You could break it down in costs per seat, or just per cargo kg, since an economy seat is the least profitable contributor on the flight.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for sharing ✈️ ✈️ ✈️

  • @berkeleyfuller-lewis3442
    @berkeleyfuller-lewis3442 Місяць тому +3

    Very likely, Airbus's composite A-350 benefited from NOT being "#1" -- i.e. first out of the gate. Likely Airbus learned a LOT from Boeing's pioneering effort with the 787.

    • @AndresDeLaTorre-xv7wy
      @AndresDeLaTorre-xv7wy Місяць тому

      Puede ser 787 es confiable asta el no e ti cero accidente A350 ya los tiene

  • @fotismpalopitas7196
    @fotismpalopitas7196 Місяць тому

    Excellent video once again dude. I have never flown with A350 so I don’t have any thoughts about this aircraft. But i have flown with United’s 787-9 twice from Athens to Newark and back to Athens and according to my view is the best aircraft ever. I really felt my respiratory system so healthy during the flight while wing flex is something beyond incredible. Boeing did such a great job when designed the Dreamliner pushing Airbus to make its rival response.
    Greetings from Greece. 🇬🇷🇺🇸

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      many thanks for your feedback, hope one day you will experience the A350! and please share with us then

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      ✈️✈️✈️

    • @nrml76
      @nrml76 Місяць тому

      The best widebody jet for economy class passengers in my experience of all the ones still in widespread operation is the A380 by a big margin. The A350 is second best and the 787 third. The A330 is fourth and a long way behind in last place the the current 777. Hopefully the new 777x will be better for passenger comfort.

  • @Ralphdill
    @Ralphdill Місяць тому +2

    Pricing seems inaccurate if I am to believe other blogs

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your feedback

  • @eduardodaquiljr9637
    @eduardodaquiljr9637 Місяць тому +1

    Which is fuel efficient and fly smoothly?

  • @TheTompinai
    @TheTompinai Місяць тому +1

    350 all the way

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      great choice 👌

  • @smeary10
    @smeary10 29 днів тому +1

    They don't compete. The A350 completes with the 777X and the 787 competes with the A330ceo/neo. You may as well do a comparison between the A380 and the 717.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  29 днів тому +1

      yep thanks for your comment

    • @smeary10
      @smeary10 29 днів тому

      @@FLIGAVIA You should do a video on Qantas' new A350-1000ULR 'Sunrise' aircraft with the extra fuel tank and 238 passenger limit that will fly the longest routes in the world such as SYD/MEL to LAX/LHR in early 2026.

  • @user-en2pf2ce1n
    @user-en2pf2ce1n Місяць тому

    Never flown an A350 but like the Boeing family of jets. Really like the 787-9 for long haul, very comfortable. My understanding of the shorter range on the 787-10 is that it need different wings / engines which kind of defeats Boeings uniformity between the models? 11:08

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for sharing your experience✈️✈️✈️

  • @KlausErmecke
    @KlausErmecke Місяць тому

    At 0:58 you say that the A350 XWB consists of a composite fuselage, paired with metal wings. But the re-invented A350 (the "XWB" extension was meanwhile seemingly dropped by Airbus marketing) is all-composite:

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for reminding us

  • @AndresDeLaTorre-xv7wy
    @AndresDeLaTorre-xv7wy Місяць тому +1

    787

  • @journeyingjohn3275
    @journeyingjohn3275 Місяць тому +1

    Airbus are better built, more efficient and have a longer range...

  • @cesarchoya6961
    @cesarchoya6961 Місяць тому +3

    the voice is artificially designed it gives a sense of untruthfullness.

    • @berkeleyfuller-lewis3442
      @berkeleyfuller-lewis3442 Місяць тому

      And you know this, how? Is your comment "artificially designed? . . ."

    • @cesarchoya6961
      @cesarchoya6961 Місяць тому +1

      I don’t have utter truth about the statement, but Prosody; the intonation is not real, the lapse between word and word, there’re regular unnatural lapses. It’s not a pejorative comment just a feeling. But I real think that voice is artificial. I am not a bot. I’ ve listened a lot CHATGPT and there’re certain common patterns.

    • @peterellis1072
      @peterellis1072 Місяць тому

      @@cesarchoya6961 I agree with you, for instance it pronounces mach as match not mark and its annoying how it keeps calling the A350 as the A350 XWB which was the name Airbus called it on initially proposing it.
      It is now just called the A350.Together with the cutting and pasting audio it really is not worth listening to.

  • @georgeszurbach444
    @georgeszurbach444 Місяць тому +1

    The 787 competitor is the à 330 not the a 350 .

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your feedback

  • @lucindadabd
    @lucindadabd Місяць тому

    The cockpit design differences are fascinating! Which do pilots generally prefer: the hands-on Boeing or the automated Airbus?

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your feedback

    • @Psi-Storm
      @Psi-Storm Місяць тому

      Boeing has a different cockpit design for every line, while Airbus keeps it consistent across all aircraft models. This means that as an A330 pilot it's significantly easier to get qualification for the A350 then swapping between Boeing planes, or between brands. With the side sticks in the Airbus cockpit you have more personal space too.

  • @AlfCalson
    @AlfCalson Місяць тому +1

    ✈️

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому +1

      thanks for your comment ✈️ ✈️ ✈️

  • @eduardodaquiljr9637
    @eduardodaquiljr9637 Місяць тому

    787 is flex wing design state of the art fly smoothly and fuel efficient.New wing technology not solid wing like old model plane.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for sharing

  • @boondockduane
    @boondockduane Місяць тому +1

    Two different aircraft…

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      indeed. which one do you prefer?

  • @vutwila
    @vutwila Місяць тому

    I’ve always been a fan of Boeing, but the A350’s wider cabin is a game-changer for comfort. Thoughts?

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      yeah A350 is my fav

    • @widget787
      @widget787 Місяць тому

      Depends on the cabin configuration.

  • @TappanZee1234
    @TappanZee1234 Місяць тому +1

    AI from mispronunciations. An Airbus channel.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your feedback, we're aviation fans

    • @roberthenry9319
      @roberthenry9319 Місяць тому

      No. That's not it. This voice is computer generated. It is a "fake" AI voice, and it is a cheap and crummy one.

  • @tawjt6
    @tawjt6 Місяць тому

    Both the A350 and 787 are impressive, but I’m curious, which one is more fuel-efficient over long distances?

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      A350

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      ✈️ ✈️ ✈️ ✈️ ✈️

    • @JPB57
      @JPB57 Місяць тому

      @@FLIGAVIAWe operate both: the A350 and the B787, but we don’t have the same conclusion. If you say so, give comparison with statistics for different kind of flights….

  • @nataliexm80
    @nataliexm80 Місяць тому

    The range on the A350 is really impressive. Does this mean it’s more popular with airlines for longer routes?

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      maybe, airlines love A350

    • @Psi-Storm
      @Psi-Storm Місяць тому

      Yes. For example on routes from Europe to South America, South Africa and especially Asia, since Russia closed the airspace at the start of the Ukraine war, which lead to up to 1000nm longer routes.

    • @tomdavis8757
      @tomdavis8757 Місяць тому

      @@FLIGAVIAeven the ones with peeling paint?

  • @patrickpeters2903
    @patrickpeters2903 Місяць тому

    The Dreamliner is a good plane. But Boeing put a very aggressive pricing tag in the first years. Then shit happened. With repetitive quality issues. And until now, despite very impressive high sales, the B787 is not yet profitable. While the A350 will make profit from this year.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      nice thanks for sharing! ✈️

  • @ramarakeshv
    @ramarakeshv Місяць тому +1

    PW doesnt power any of these aircraft s😊

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому +1

      thanks for your comment

  • @roberthenry9319
    @roberthenry9319 Місяць тому +3

    FLIG AVIA's use of this really cheap and cheesy "robo voice" (computer generated) tells us that FLIG does not respect its viewers. Using an AI voice instead of a human narrator is like showing a middle finger to viewers. That is a shame, because the content here is really great. But it is very painful and maddening to listen to this video.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your feedback! we are improving the voice ✈️ ✈️ ✈️

    • @engrpas
      @engrpas Місяць тому

      Not just the voice, but please add a pause between sentences!

  • @theKhumbaguy
    @theKhumbaguy Місяць тому +1

    I totally hate fake AI speech/narration.
    The topic is lovely, but listening to a computer is sooo irritating.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for your feedback, we'll improve the voice

  • @bwithrow011
    @bwithrow011 Місяць тому +1

    Someone should reprogram the narration computer to say Mach correctly. It's Mock phonetically

  • @motioncompensation1544
    @motioncompensation1544 Місяць тому +1

    Horrible AI voice over.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      thanks for feedback! the problem will improve soon

  • @shabirhussain4719
    @shabirhussain4719 Місяць тому +2

    there is no comparison between these two. 350 far far better then 787

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Місяць тому

      yeah thanks for comment