Audi Q6 E Tron Quattro | Range Test @ 120KPH (75MPH)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • A huge thanks to Zaptec for sponsoring this video!
    Buy a Zaptec GO from one of our trusted partners:
    Belgium zaptec.com/nl-...
    Denmark zaptec.com/da/...
    France www.zaptec.com...
    Germany zaptec.com/de/...
    Netherlands zaptec.com/nl/...
    Norway zaptec.com/fin...
    Sweden zaptec.com/sv/...
    Switzerland www.zaptec.com...
    UK zaptec.com/en-...
    Other markets
    Contact us zaptec.com/en/...
    Find an installer zaptec.com/en/...
    Get the official 0% SOC merch!
    shop.spreadshi...
    Do you want to support the channel? Please check out my Patreon:
    www.patreon.co...
    Social media @ Krisrifa
    Krisrifa @ Instagram
    Riisfalch @ Snapchat
    DISCLAIMER: Links above may be affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service with the links that I provide (not limited to the products in the links), I may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge for you, but you will however be supporting my channel. And that is much appreciated.
    Commenting guidelines and rules:
    Be civil and nice, do not be aggressive against other commenters. Constructive criticism and debate is encouraged, but attacks are not.
    Spreading false information and personal attacks are not allowed and can get you banned without notice. Misrepresenting the content of the video falsely in the comments is not permitted and can get you banned.Accusing me or others of being willfully dishonest (or even lying), when the video shows the contrary will get you banned for life.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 38

  • @ProFleer-ep4wq
    @ProFleer-ep4wq 12 днів тому +3

    Consumption is of lesser importance with 800V charging, going from 20% to 80% in 15 minutes.

  • @woodypwx
    @woodypwx 12 днів тому +3

    Audi A6 e-tron Sportback will be my new car. Sedans are much more effective EVs

  • @BillB33525
    @BillB33525 13 днів тому +6

    407 km or 253 miles isn't all that great these days. 226 Wh/Km or 363 Wh/Mi while a little better than the Q8, the range is about the same range as the Q8. I would have expected better considering this is a new model. Any hints on V2H capability? These cars are nice to drive but falling behind on efficiency and features like V2H.

    • @KrisRifa
      @KrisRifa  13 днів тому

      Yeah I agree! You can see from my test of the Q8 E-Tron 55 it only got about 6 miles less range than this Q6 E-Tron Quattro, so this car should have done better range wise!

    • @Erigion
      @Erigion 12 днів тому

      @@KrisRifa Q8 does have a 14 kwh larger battery

    • @KrisRifa
      @KrisRifa  12 днів тому

      @@Erigion 11.1kWh bigger usable

    • @robertcoufal7710
      @robertcoufal7710 12 днів тому

      lets wait for a new macan and hope that consumption will be better

    • @abraxastulammo9940
      @abraxastulammo9940 11 днів тому

      ​@@robertcoufal7710macan has good drag coefficient, etron q6 has bad - does not matter much when "sunday driving" or around town. 🤷

  • @davidfarrell1062
    @davidfarrell1062 9 днів тому

    For me q6 not worth price. Have q4 and at 6ft 3 have good room front and back. Expected q6 at 20 to 30k dearer would be bigger but it's not. Q6 and Q4 as well will find it hard to get below 20kwh per 100km at motorway when others can achieve that.

  • @alexandervs3369
    @alexandervs3369 12 днів тому +1

    This car is far too expensive for what it offers.

  • @lyrith2422
    @lyrith2422 13 днів тому +1

    Cheap Macan EV.
    This is the biggest problem with this car. A 12.1-meter turning radius. No rear-axle-steering. :(

    • @josefv-y8m
      @josefv-y8m 12 днів тому

      Like a Model 3...same Bad turning circle and no one cares .

  • @bjrnchrstn
    @bjrnchrstn 13 днів тому +2

    If people just understand the concept of WLTP they wouldn’t have to act ‘all surprised’.
    These real range tests are also very dubious in outcome. Sure similar conditions like wind, temperature etc help but still there are differences.
    In Norway for instance there is more height difference then in my flat Holland. Thus the ‘real range test’ will come up with different results.
    If you understand the concept of WLTP then all these tests aren’t needed.

    • @KrisRifa
      @KrisRifa  13 днів тому +3

      The lowest elevation on this route is 122m and the highest is at 220m, so only 100m difference over almost 200km. So it is basically flat.
      "If you understand the concept of WLTP then all these tests aren’t needed." That's not true, these tests are absolutely necessary because high speeds effect EV differently, something the WLTP test don't account for. Look at the chart, the best EVs manage over 80% of their WLTP rated range in summer, while others (like this Q6 E-Tron) barely manage 60%. So there is a huge difference. The Audi Q8 E-Tron 55 WLTP rated range is 492km, while the Q6 E-Tron Quattro is 615km, but in this test there is only 10km difference. So these test are absolutely necessary.

    • @abraxastulammo9940
      @abraxastulammo9940 11 днів тому

      ​@@KrisRifaq8 gets away with it because of better drag coefficient and because async motor gets more efficient at higher speeds (which wltp single number does not reveal).
      On the other hand of the spectrum my Enyaq driving will be average of 13.9 kWh/100 km at 28 km/h after 7000 km since last November.

  • @Astke
    @Astke 13 днів тому +1

    Q8 e-tron and SQ6 e-tron were tested at way more mild temperatures though. Talking 10C difference and way less wind. This can make a 5-10% consumption difference.

    • @KrisRifa
      @KrisRifa  13 днів тому

      Ideal temperatures are 18-20c. Anything colder means you're running the heater and anything warmer you're the AC. I'd say SQ6 conditions where better, but considering consumption Q8 E-Tron conditions are pretty similar except for wind. That extra wind may account for 1-2% at most though.

  • @christophercamarena7451
    @christophercamarena7451 13 днів тому +1

    I never clicked on a video so fast 😆

  • @FFL3001
    @FFL3001 13 днів тому

    wth man... my car was advertized with a 400km range, and guess what! Its range is 400km.

  • @boysmakenoize
    @boysmakenoize 11 днів тому

    Do you share the excel comparison anywhere?

  • @kaybe3044
    @kaybe3044 13 днів тому

    I would like to know what Audi gives as an explaination for this bad range. Especially compared to the SQ6. That had way bigger and wider tires and it also has bigger fenders so.... This should have close to 500km. Audi better have something to say about this.

    • @anoniem9518
      @anoniem9518 13 днів тому

      Eh... the Audi Q7 e-tron delivers a pretty respectable range, and you are framing it as a bad range... lol

    • @kaybe3044
      @kaybe3044 13 днів тому

      @@anoniem9518 I assume you mean Q6. as percentage of WLTP it’s pretty bad.

  • @Dustmaker18
    @Dustmaker18 13 днів тому

    Would you pick the Q6 e-tron or a Q8 e-tron ? Are navigation system the same ? I know screens are different

    • @josefv-y8m
      @josefv-y8m 12 днів тому +2

      I personally would not even think about Q8...an awful fat beast...drives like a pregnant hippo...with ancient technic compared to Q6.
      Obvious not that much more range, but charges twice as fast.

    • @Deak787
      @Deak787 12 днів тому

      If the money is close, Q8 is my choice.

    • @evkx
      @evkx 12 днів тому

      @@josefv-y8m in fact Q8 chargers with higher speed 10-100%. Charging the SQ6 to 100% is quite painfull

    • @Allride_
      @Allride_ 11 днів тому +1

      Q8 is so thirsty charging will not make up for it, it's way more expensive to run and it is both built on an old architecture as well as has old, way worse infotainment on the Q8. The world of EVs is changing so fast and the Q8 has not really changed since it was introduced as the etron in 2019. Don't get the 6 year old car!

    • @abraxastulammo9940
      @abraxastulammo9940 11 днів тому

      ​@@josefv-y8mBut the Q8 suspension has improved?!

  • @singstaen
    @singstaen 12 днів тому

    Det jeg ikke forstår i denne videoen er at det er to biler i den. Ble den testet på 19" som den første bilen har eller var det med 20" som det ser ut som bil nummer to har?

    • @KrisRifa
      @KrisRifa  11 днів тому

      Hæææ? Er bare en bil 🙈🤣

    • @singstaen
      @singstaen 11 днів тому

      @@KrisRifa Hehe - det er to ulike biler på filmen . EJ36172(19") og EJ31148 (20"?) 🙂

    • @KrisRifa
      @KrisRifa  11 днів тому

      @@singstaen åja… nå skjønner jeg hva du mener. Det er et B-Roll klipp av SQ6en jeg referer til som jeg har testet tidligere.

    • @singstaen
      @singstaen 11 днів тому

      @@KrisRifa så da var det 19" tommere på bilen du testet denne gangen?

  • @guppi7634
    @guppi7634 13 днів тому

    Quiet good compared to a polestar 4 under comparable conditions.

  • @nikpen2921
    @nikpen2921 13 днів тому +1

    Hello Kris, please contact me. I'm the person that won from Your channel A Zaptec Go homecharger yesterday. But I cant write my e-mail here, and I dont know why?!?

    • @KrisRifa
      @KrisRifa  13 днів тому +1

      Hi Nik! Write med a message on my Instagram, Kris Rifa and I'll contact you!

    • @madsthomsen8006
      @madsthomsen8006 13 днів тому +2

      Congrats 😊