Bank of America CEO: We don't work with tobacco companies and manufacturers who allow weapons modifi
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 кві 2019
- The CEOs of America's largest banks testify on Capitol Hill this morning about how the industry has transformed in the 10 years following the financial crisis. Rep. Bill Posey (R-Fla.) questions Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon, Bank of America Brian Moynihan, BNY Mellon CEO Charles Scharf, State Street CEO Ronald O'Hanley and Citigroup CEO Michael Corbat.
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Find CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Google+: cnb.cx/PlusCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
#CNBC
If you want to see how not to answer a question watch all these videos with these big bank CEO s.
😯mr posey sounds really respectful!
Chances are he has a lot of money in one of these banks lol
Time to go to your local credit union
Yes, that's where my sons and I opened accounts. I'll never use one of these banks again.
I think BofA should trade the tabacoo companies for the Marijuana companies
Many billions of dollar on the table
Mr Posey is a scatter brain bruh
more like the ceo's of the banks. he had to ask two or three times for every single one of them
JUST ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
Oye vey.
Guns don’t kill people,
people kill people.
Most objections to this are an appeal to emotion fallacy
Brandon gun gives people the tool to kill ppl faster in the most convenient way possible. Your logic can apply the same way to bomb. Bomb dont kill people, people kill people. Then, a knife or a car can kill people, why dont we ban them?, you ask. Well, so as the plane, the train, all the hard objects, etc. but it is not convenient to kill people using these. A gun or a bomb is easier because it is designed specifically to kill. Actually your logic is the fallacy, not the other ways.
Trony Tran
First of all, your lack of grammar doesn’t help you prove your point. Second of all, all of the reasons you listed only prove my point further. They show that these objects aren’t the problem because any object can be used to kill. Their original purpose is irrelevant because people shoot guns at targets for entertainment all the time without having to kill any person.
This same logic can be applied to school, claiming my pencil caused my bad grades. When clearly that’s not that case. Does that make sense?
And third, if my logic has a fallacy in it, which fallacy is it?
I hope this helps!
Brandon This is why all weapons including nukes and lmgs should be available to the public. #2nd Amendment
Brandon sure I dont have excuse for my grammar as english is not my mother tongue, but at least you understand me. But then, why does the government ban bombs? They are used to open new paths, harvest rocks and clear mountains as well. If gun is so safe, why washington dc has gun free zones? Why they are so scared? Gun must be banned because there is nothing guarantee an insane ppl wont use it to kill a bunch of people before some good people with a gun shoot them. Further more, mental test or check doesnt help. A normal person can become crazy at any time, either permanent or temporary.