Klee... I salute you for being such a great communicator of extremely complicated concepts. Your ability to speak clearly, concisely and comprehensibly on a number of complex subjects is simply amazing. You are truly unique, in my view. Thank you.
Years ago I had the idea that everything we see and do, our external reality, was a symbol of our internal reality. Sort of like a dream but more immediate, where as dreams are more of a future projection or past reflection from a different perspective of symbols who arent limited by external physics. Now, what I have found is that focus on desired outcomes creates desired outcome but, the more focus you have the more the outcome is closer to the desire. Usually around 3-6months for it to start appearing. Then there is the whole jinxing situation, another story. Anyway, what Im saying here is that Ive started to see how consciousness plays a part on reality. Some of it is pretty obvious while others can go unnoticed. Interesting to see some physicists getting into it to explain it in a mathematical way. I think the tetrahedron is the internal world (thought) and the external world is a grouping of five tetrahedron forming a cube. (although it seems to be many shapes moving around, inside and outside each other while expanding and contracting at the same time) Sort of like for something to exist in the external, it needs to be formed by five ideas. Cant wait to see what you guys come up with next :)
Thank you for this patient and thorough explanation of such difficult concepts. I can't grasp it all, but you have given a powerful framework for further thought. I have no capability in physics so I especially appreciate your careful explanation of current thinking in terms that are accessible to those of us not educated in your field.
Mind blown! After watching it was like the floodgates to creative reasoning just burst wide open. My first thought concerned the question of consciousness. I just spontaneously thought, why would anyone immediately leap to saying ’if there is a code then there is a meaning and that proves god’ I mean why go to the most complex form of consciousness before we can quantify or describe its smallest component? Of course after this I started to ponder on what that could be. It struck me that at this moment, I felt more conscious than I had felt in a long time; so I figured that the answer was hiding somewhere in my experience of watching your video. All of the information and new perspectives was definitely a part of it; but even more the way it made me feel. This led to me trying to understand and clarify to myself, how the the act of watching this video could provoke such a response. Here is my attempt: The topic of the video is far beyond my level of education, so it is not information that I easily digest. My cognitive process basically started from deciphering basic symbols. I have always had a problem with understanding math; but this time, math became visual. In my mind I could see how the process took place. It was like I had a pile of Legos in front of me and beyond that I could see a structure in the making, being built by blocks of different colour, falling on top of each other in a specific order. In an attempt to understand where each piece was supposed to fit I started building my own structure; first sorting the pieces in my pile of Legos to replicate the pattern of the structure I saw, and then trying to forsee what the next piece would be. All of a sudden the two structures mirrored each other, but that’s not all. They not only lined up, not only looked the same - they interacted! I could forsee what block would fall next, and thus I could join in on building the first structure. I placed a lego and the next pice that fell linked to mine! The sensation that followed was immediate. I felt my consciousness expand. The conclusion I drew from this exercise was that consciousness is pattern synchronisation. When I could line up with the pattern, when my own building blocks were reorganised to harmonize with the falling Legos, a new awareness was made. This way of looking at the process appealed to me. My next step was to try to find the most miniscule symbol and response-situation, I also asked myself if that necessarily constitutes consciousness. For some reason what I visualized now was little balls falling at an angle against a glass surface, through which I was watching. At first one ball hit the surface and bounced back while continuing the fall; then more and more balls followed. At first it seemed chaotic. Balls falling against the surface, bouncing back, hitting other balls, creating a response… but when I turned up the flow, and mentally shrunk the size of the balls to grains of sand; I could see how a self Organizing pattern emerged. A pattern devoid of consciousness. Then it hit me. That means that code can exist without a conscious code creator or conscious code reader. Just after the thought had popped up I had to smile at myself. When it hit It felt groundbreaking but just a second later i realised that it’s Basic. ”No one believes that a computer is conscious, just because it can read and react to code…” but then I felt another jolt hit. ”True, but you just saw the computer come into existence without a creator”. I felt a really weird energy pumping within me. I really loved it and wanted to continue asking questions and look for answers. Actually I couldn’t stop it. I knew I had to sleep and switch my mindset to the more trivial questions of labouring for bread and shelter. Pushing the sensations I felt into a box seemed impossible though. This made me remember how I once learned to juggle. I practiced like crazy one evening without really getting the hang of it, and then I fell asleep. Imagine my surprise the next day when I picked up the juggling set to continue my practice; only to realize that I had learned how to do it during my sleep. This memory helped me to calm down a bit. Perhaps what I needed to grasp the next level of understanding, was time for my brain to play with the Legos on its own… without the conscious mind interfering. Perhaps that will self organise the bits of information into even more wonderful patterns…
Wow, I am impressed. I am equally impressed by your ability to explain, as the subject matter itself. I would be lost with the associated mathematics, but your ability to explain intuitively is very impressive. To the point even I understood the basic principles behind your reasoning. Thank you.
If you've watched this video and still need more science, check out our new film Hacking Reality! ua-cam.com/video/vJi3_znm7ZE/v-deo.html Is there an 8-dimensional "engine" behind our universe? Join Marion Kerr on a fun, visually exciting journey as she explores a mysterious, highly complex structure known simply as 'E8'--a weird, 8-dimensional object that for some, strange reason, appears to encode within it all of the particles and forces of our 3-dimensional universe.
I’ve been studying/researching quantum mechanics, neuroscience, philosophy, and other esoteric writings seeking the same answers and it’s so exciting to see it all coming together in a cohesive way with your eloquent theory of everything. The ideas your talking about here are not foreign to me at all and I look forward to watching the progression of your research! These breakthroughs you are making have huge implications and real world applications, and will most certainly usher us into a Star Trek age, as you know. :) Thank you and your team for all you’re doing and are about to do for humankind! (Or technically have already done since we live in only the beautiful, spacious present.) 😊
TS Yes, I would add that it’s imbedded in many different ancient myths, traditions, and religions from around the world that were geographically isolated at the time of the writings. Interesting they all they all same thing though....
@@kristensotelo4212 yes that is very true, we find very similar concepts in religions. Of course there were some influence between religions & one good example is the Persian influence we find in the Christian new testament - after the Persians conquered Judea & the Jewish people came into contact with the Zoroastrian religion & its concepts such as good v evil, loyal followers are resurrected after death, god will bring his wrath onto the world etc (these are totally new concepts borrowed from Persia & incorporated into Christianity), but even so, it still doesnt account for the host of inherent similarities we observe across all religions. I think a good example is also the construction of pyramids we find in cultures that had no contact with each other & yet so many built the same structures. Ive come across multiple theories as to why this is & perhaps the most plausable ive seen thus far is the theory that humanity is actually older than we think & did in fact survive certain mass extinction events with people being seperated due to natural disaster events causing them to form new groups, migrate & possibly try to perpetuate historical knowledge through religious concepts, structures etc. The recent discovery of Gobekli Tepe totally transformed our historical knowledge of humanity & it was discovered just a few years ago. We are still unearthing our history to this very day so who knows what else we could find & perhaps most importantly, who knows what has been lost & can never be recovered api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2016/01/150120-gobekli-tepe-oldest-monument-turkey-archaeology
Just found your channel - and really enjoyed this video. As a non-scientist I greatly appreciate your ability to translate your work into a language I can follow. Extremely interesting and I look forward to watching additional videos.
Klee Irwin is not only a very intelligent man, but above all, extremely brave to dare to go to the farthest edges of current science and put in the insane effort of trying to explain what is - likely - possible. I have so much respect for him! Investing his wealth and his time into much needed research which is insanely fascinating to me and a friend, we watch his videos in awe with a beamer that projects it on a wall and then we engage in a discussion that lasts for hours and hours. Love it!
Can never watch this too many times. Never gets old. And every time I watch this lecture I take back something new. In fact I had to watch a couple times before slightly understanding. A lot to take in here and Klee does a good job at leimening it.
Since (assuming) information is entropy and entropy is the missing part of energy after it went through a cycle of exchanges, therefore information is not energy but rather 'spent' energy, and reality is 'spent' enegy.
Reality is a probablity system, conscious intent modifies the otherwise random draw from the probablity within it's natural uncertainty. So, it's not determanistic or random. It's a simple loop at the smallest scale: Next state is current state modified by conscious intent operating on the random draw from a probability wavefunction within it's natural uncertainty. And at large scale you get statistical results and that's why everythng seems solid and objective. The reason why C is a constant is because it always moves exactly 1 pixel each itteration of the inner loop. if you think about the simulation speed: Δx = 1,616199e-35 meters (planck length) C = 299792458 meters per second (speed of light) Δt = Δx / C (speed = distance over time) Δt = 5,3910595709515814437199751035765e-44 seconds (our simulation speed, asuming Δx = planck length)
For me your comment is a great summary. I am right now reading Tom Campbell's My Big TOE (Theory of Everything), I recommend it. I don't know if you know about it, but it's totally in line with your comment. Regards !
Great Shaun ! Thanks for letting me know. Are you participating in Tom's teachings other than the trilogy and UA-cam, like video chats or in the physical seminars?
Well, after searching for many years, I stumbled on MBT. After reading the book and watching many of the lectures I found that it did explain many of my questions. Then I fought with it for about 3 years trying to break the logic, and I still do that. But so far nothing has even put a dent in it. Now that there are (QM) physics experiments pending we will have to see how that goes, but if they produce the predicted results then it will be no less than a paradigm shift in our understanding of reality. In the mean time MBT has already been a personal paradigm shift, as I have gathered my own experience of it, it's daily value is immense. But I still look at many alternative theories like the QGR, I feel they are all converging on the same model. So, I do like to participate in facebook/youtube convo's. I don't feel the need to go to the seminars nor do I have the time for it :)
All right Shaun, thanks for your comment. Yeah, lets hope that someone conducts the proposed experiments as soon as possible, and sure enough, the results will be shocking, one way or another. I am more or less in the same path, but I guess behind you for what you say. I hope your search of other alternatives brings you closer and closer to what you want to know and be. Best regards and thanks again.
I love to listen to Klee speak. So articulate. I wonder constantly about the nature of reality and I'm so glad he does too because his ideas are profound.
Hi Klee, I'm going with "described by information". Also, consciousness. What if, everything in some way was conscious? Even space-time. I need space-time to be the observer of gravity to get rid of the notion of dark matter. Then space-time is a "participant observer", which for me is what consciousness means. Perhaps I'm wrong to equate consciousness, but should we not attempt to tie down what consciousness is first? As ridiculous as this might sound; maybe zero should be replaced with the notion of consciousness. I can't think of anything that can really be described by zero, except the origins in our coordinate systems. One cool aspect to no zero is obviously no singularities. But consciousness? Phi? It's there but why? Very keen to hear your explanation for gravity.
Klee, you've done a great production with this very clear and concise presentation. Your thoughts about consciousness experiencing NO TIME due to the speed of light are interesting. I theorize that the death of the human body causes the soul/consciousness to experience NO TIME as well. Until the point at which that consciousness incarnates again... and again, through multiple dimensions.
Death, physical death, is Just an illusion. Consciousness is eternal. Whether you get grouped with the angelic or the demonic, after physical death, is the real story. Be careful what you choose in this life. It's not only a classroom, but it's also a test 😉
incredibly fascinating , I really think that you are on to something with your work. From what I've learned regarding quantum physics over the years, this real feels like you are connecting the dots from all different parts of science. Thank you for trying to explain your work in laymen terms.
So essentially we're a self-referential, 3D projected organically regenerating fractal and potentially a comically bad subroutine within an operating system that is sentient but within rules of a 8D crystal sandbox code written by a malicious or bored alien programmer from the future and the past wanting to get a better grade on his programming paper in that dimension. But we created them, or will, once we become aware of them, and then they'll have moved on and it will be a movie by Ridley Scott.
Ive taken various psychedelic drugs like Psilocybin, DMT, LSD etc. I always see the same geometry & it just seems to flow out of nowhere. This brings up a question, is this geometry real & we enter a new conciousness thus allowing us to perceive it OR is it just a chemical reaction bringing forth what is already within the mind? Regardless of the answer, both are equally amazing to think about. If it is just a chemical reaction there is so much more to the mind than what we can comprehend
you are an amazing speaker, able to articulate such complexity with ease. I admire you a lot! I know you will discover incredible things and share them, for which I am excited!
The fact that you know I exist now is pretty exciting. I know...groupies. I really am excited. If your ever in Sonoma County speaking, please let me know...I would love to come hear you.
The hypothetical exclusion of God led to the remarkable progress of modern science in the past three centuries. But emancipation from clerical dogma was gained by the price of accepting one paradox: The exclusion of the transcendent is itself a dogma. Irwin explains a way, to ease this paradox out, by saying: God may or may not exist - it simply does not play a role for science, God will never deliver an explanatory advantage because in the end science will ask: So, why does God do this, and how did he came to existence?
Funny thing is, on psychadelics (psyllocibin,lsd,DMT) sometimes you get visuals that can cause super symmetry, like looking in a mirror, your brain can not comprahend which half of your face it should take to symmetrize. Sometimes it causes you to see mandalas similar to E8 with the naked eyes. The geometric shapes shift and move like four dimensonal objects, while the shapes and colorings that make up the crystal/mandala, represent information of your preception. Weird stuff, only learned about quantum mechanics and sciences after i took shrooms. And the similarities are uncanny.
This is a wonderfully cogent explanation of the latest thinking in quantum mechanics and our search for an explanation of everything. Enthralling and accessible! Thank you Klee. Thank you QGR.
yeh. so true its not "random" even though the quantum foam may appear so. like ripples on the ocean making peaks and troughs, collisions, whirls etc. but at the core each point particle interaction of causality in a complex structure mkes up the slices of momentum and energy of points at a given time. have enough slices can predict what can happen, but these orders of thermodynamics and rules apply to closed systems If I'm not mistaken. in most cases its not closed systems so you cnnot attribute certain properties.
Well we don't know if the universe exhibits deterministic complexity or if it's non-deterministic. Cryptography tells us that regardless, you can't tell the difference beyond a sufficiently high computational bound. We certainly do observe randomness in quantum physics but we don't yet get to know if that randomness is the result of deterministic or non-deterministic laws.
I think this guy Klee is awesome. Seems very intelligent and articulate. Very good at conveying the idea to someone like me, who knows a little but not much. Thanks for the video!
Great video. I have a question? You say that unlike string theory, there is no need to invent or create other dimensions right? But then why do you need an 8 dimension crystal to cast a 3d image we can see? isn't this theory also dependent on additional dimensions for it to work? That part confused me and if you or anyone can help me with that would be awesome. I've watched your vids dozens of times and I'm starting to put it together. Thank you so much for this.
Fabulous stuff Klee! Must be so exciting to be part of a team working at the frontier of such a fundamental knowledge. Do you need a software developer in your team with great enthusiasm and love for mathematics and physics?
It's not quite true that an object is "anything that can be thought of" but is rather "a thing, as known". The thing doesn't have to be known and may exist without a knower or in the absence of a knower, but an object presupposes a knower.
This is one of the most interesting videos I have come across! This is an invitation to see a new interpretation of quantum mechanics with the mathematics of quantum mechanics representing the physics of ‘time’ as a geometrical interactive process of energy exchange. In this theory we have an emergent future unfolding photon by photon that forms the ever changing world of our everyday life. With classical physics representing process over a period of time as in Newton’s deferential equations.
Why is the E8 crystal projected down specifically to the E4 quasicrystal? What is so special/particular about E4? Does it have special properties physically? Does it have a more efficient language and symbols? Why not use the projections of E7, E6, E5, E2, E1? What is this specific angle used in the E4 projection? Why is this specific angle chosen? Was it mathematically derived? Can you provide a visual animation of this angle and projection? When a higher order crystal is projected down to a lower dimension, is any information lost in the projection? Is information fully preserved? When recreating a higher order crystal from a lower order projection are there any errors in the recreation with information provided by a lower dimension quasicrystal? Is the binary language the most efficient language in the universe? Mathematically? Explain why the E3 quasicrystal has a more efficient language than the E4 quasicrystal. With the spin quantity. Can you please provide animations and visual explanations of all the ideas that you presented in this discussion. Thank you.
His description of emergence was excellent. And while there were many "mind blown" moments, my favorite is at 21:00: the likening of the organization of single celled organisms to create a complex organism with higher consciousness to a collection of single human consciousnesses to create a higher human consciousness. Then I thought of "herd mentality" and wonder if collective consciousness is something that is already happening whether we are aware or not. We may not reach a useful/practical collective consciousness until we create a unified collective consciousness and remove our petty individuality.
I have on many occasions and can absolutely 100% confirm that retro-causality is a real phenomenon and part of our reality. It can be accessed by becoming part of the language that defines us and our reality. Make the right 'choices' and you will activate that part of the program (ie entangle yourself with the source code) that affects the present by affecting the past. I kid you not.
Thank you Klee Irwin. Very revelatory and somewhat well organized. One organizing feature of your talk that I believe to be misguided is the inference that consciousness might choose to use humanity as a tool to increase its scope over the cosmos when it has already done so. The remaining task of consciousness might be to revel in its exploration of the mixing of the two domains of separateness and unity. As humans we are to proceed with the task. Onward.
So hypothetically, if this is all cogent, then it very neatly explains crop circles as geometric symbols representing themselves, sort of the same "pi" number sequence thing like in the movie "Contact" but only with the Golden Ratio, written in rye and wheat.
Factor in a "zero point" geometry and infinity loops. They're scalable thru the focus/hub of the superposition zero matrix. This is the infinity gate which creates charges electrically as weak forces are combined from atom centres to atom centres forming a focus at the gravitational centre of that mass. Potential difference between a black hole zero point and another blackhole zero point creates a subspace current flow in the network or field of the fabric of space time.
The most efficient system of code is not the one with the least amount of symbols or expressions, it is the code with the least amount of symbols and expression FOR THE PARTICULAR TASK to which the code is to be applied. Some tasks call for more complex code than other tasks. The most efficient code is that which has no more or less symbols and expression than necessary to perform the intended task.
Reality is a reflection of how we define everything. The reality that we define does not therefore exist outside of our mind. So what is real? Reality is a concept. Real is a concept. These are words in our vocabulary. Perceived reality reflects our collective understanding. It only a collective understanding because we educate our children to perceive the world in 'generic terms'. What exists beyond our collective understanding is as limitless as the potential for our minds. All the great sciences and technologies were created in the mind before they were created in the world. However, the motor vehicle is now real. Its a reflection of the mind. Reality 'does not' exist outside the mind.
We'll never get to see what's behind the "Curtain" as long as we believe a person's skin color, gender, or sexuality is a determinant factor of their inherent worth as human beings!! It is of paramount importance that as we progress in the sciences, that we progress in human compassion and understanding. The universe will not allow us to spread our hatreds, trash, and ecological destruction into its infinite realms!!!
Could the Universe is based on one geometrical process forming, what some people call a primary code or reality code that forms the exchange of information that everything is based upon?
Scientific Awakening Science today is addressing the issue of axiomatic philosophy, of what energy is, by acknowledging the possibility we exist within a non-deterministic or deterministic reality - in order to progress understanding. The general consensus, within the community, is for the non-deterministic position where energy is: information that facilitates the holographic universe. Put simply ... science is aware there is a physical and non-physical aspect which is described by the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. The study of black-holes has shown objects (within the singularity) break down to their two-dimensional nature as the information reverts to the non-local state - when light cannot collapse the wave-function. This made science realise the universe is holographic in nature because a hologram is created when light is used to create a three-dimensional image on a two-dimensional surface. The two-dimensional surface, science has been studying, is the Relativity / Quantum Physics upon which light has the function of wave collapse - and that is facilitated by a conscious observer to create the three-dimensional hologram we inhabit. This "holographic reality" is animated which means it is more sophisticated than any hologram we have created - but the basic principles are the same. This is why science is (now) suggesting an eight-dimensional crystal lattice is being projected into the two-dimensional surface. A hologram requires (cohesive) light, such as a laser, to be split into two in order to send one beam directly to a surface and the other beam onto an object which is projected onto the same two-dimensional surface to create the three-dimensional image. Science is effectively attempting to describe the apparatus that creates the holographic universe, when they speak of eight-dimensional latices, because the crystal is the object that is "projected". What does this mean? Well ... to start with - science hasn't even begun to acknowledge the animation properties of the hologram which means they are ignoring a fundamental aspect of reality. The wavefunction of light is fundamental. More importantly ... they are struggling to appreciate the importance of the conscious observer - because they are aware it gives rise to philosophical axioms that undermine progress. Technically speaking - science is telling us: if every conscious being was removed from reality - all of reality, as we know it, would disolve away. ...or would it? If there is no creator, who exists beyond this reality, there would be no conscious being to facilitate the wave function - so it would disolve away. They tackle this by saying the universe is a conscious entity - which is (basically) idolatry - and, as such, it self-organizes the coding to sustain the holographic nature of realiity. Since the scripture has described the holographic nature of reality, from the position of a being that exists beyond space-time, this highlights the importance of "subjective" consciousness. ...which we (all) have. Science is, essentially, describing the cage we are imprisoned within, when it speaks of the holographic universe, so it may be wise to consider why we are here. The eight-dimensional latice, science speaks of, is also referred to in scripture as garments of glory - which means the spirit (personification of attitude) within the three-dimensional body has an eight-dimensional body being created as the spirit grows. This is not a philosophical nor a religious position but it is axiomatic because the scripture confirms we live by faith. This is because we can only be trustworthy if we are faithful - such as a husband and wife appreciate their love is founded upon trust and faithfulness. Love is when the light is cohesive. The hologram suffers malfunction, such as entropic decay, when the light is not cohesive - so it is crucial to appreciate: the spirit needs to grow before it can secure the garment it needs to exists beyond this reality. Of course ... this is assuming one wants to receive their garments - or else: they can avoid asking why to continue asking how? My Best Wishes To Everyone www.white-flag-publishing.com
@@ck58npj72 Actually ... the video is seeking to make sense of the available evidence (they acknowledge). The fact you don't understand it - doesn't give you the right to assert your own ineptitude. I understood it - so I am in a position to explain why their observations are in error. Likewise ... if you can't make sense of my explanation - I suggest you return to fifth grade education.
Information is the form of each thing, event, place, time etc. It's definition or description that tells reality how to act. Another term is concept. Concepts are only conceived by minds. The one irreducible all things share is information. Concepts are written in the language of information which a mind must understand to perceive this concept with it's perception. Understand? The beginning and the end, both meaningless terms, is information and conciousness.
Your maths might be good, but your PHILOSOPHY determines everything. If one has no idea what consciousness is, how can one reduce it to fractal amounts? How can one assume that it emerged? How can one even determine that it is reducible at all? Every one of the basic ontological questions posed in this video posits matter as the origin, creator or birthplace of Consciousness. There is another ontology that more closely adheres to Occam's Razor. *The Consciousness Only Ontology.* The ontology which posits _That All Matter And Energy Emerged Within The Field Of Consciousness. That All Reality exists _*_Within_*_ Consciousness._ That Consciousness is the ultimate all permeating all suffusing reality that totally envelops all reality and organizes (not according to the dictates of humanity, but more for his observation) all atoms, forces, energies etc as they inter-relate accordingly. The consciousness only ontology insists that all physical reality reality is merely the dance (or different vibratory expressions) of Consciousness. We posit that Materialism has reality in reverse or upside down...our paradigm is unapologetic that: *_THE UNIVERSE EMERGED DEEP WITHIN CONSCIOUSNESS...NOT THE REVERSE._*
Fantastic explanation. Very easy to understand. I'm impressed by Klee Irwin's ability to communicate all of this with what appears or so it seems, almost flawlessness in such length of time of 1 hour and 18 minutes without a script. Klee should definitely get an award for science communicator among other things. I don't know of anyone else or research firm taking the E8 quasicrystal research any further than QGR has since it was introduced by Garret Lisi. I like where you are going with all of this. I really hope you guys are doing everything you can to seek funding for your research efforts. Publication of a paper would definitely be required, especially for federal funding. I think you guys are definitely leading and changing science and physics as we currently understand it. BRAVO! Look forward to more awesomeness. Every theory ever thought of, whether recorded or not, leads back to a fundamental original source of all theories and steps of advancement of "thought". In the very nature of advancement of every human life in all its evident stages of pursuits, reasons and purposes from infancy to adulthood as well as the advancement of all humanity's collective thoughts, principles and theories in all of our history there is also a structure or "matrix" or cylical "process" of thought (I would reasonably believe it is related to the algorithmic idea of thought or consciousness as you point out in this video) that can be written on paper and understood and could serve as the center piece of every human being's template or guide so that we could all align in more agreement with one another how more and more clearly our existence and this world in which we emerge from, should be more commonly and better understood in everyone's hierarchy of thought structure. I would most certainly believe that such a centerpiece is ever so more important to introduce to the world and adopted as world population grows and there is higher propensity for more fatal conflict and also since we are currently preparing for habitation of other planets. Also consider what is said of reality, experience and consciousness by Ted Nottingham in the video below. This relates to the Alpha, as in the triangle symbol used to depict change in mathematics as you pointed out your video. 25min20sec: "Such is the nature of reality, this magical display of consciousness The reality of your experience is the magical display of your own consciousness" 25min40sec: "A change in consciousness brings about a corresponding change in the reality you encounter, A change in the reality you encounter, is an expression of a change in consciousness." ua-cam.com/video/lE5MFF2UNB4/v-deo.htmlm20s
I would like to think so. :) I know my comment is not the best of my writing and proper sentence structure, I was in a hurry. I am considering refining/editing it.
Definitely thought provoking ideas, but they seem to be a little bit speculative and 9-10 years behind the times of peer review: arxiv.org/pdf/0711.0770.pdf was a distilled version of the E8 unification concept, albeit without the whole consciousness and simulation aspects, and arxiv.org/pdf/0905.2658.pdf was the rebuttal. Is there a particular reason that your paper only lives on your site instead of ArXiv and going through the channels of peer review?
Energy is the very fabric of everything, meaning that what we perceive as reality and everything in it, including ourselves is just particles dancing with each other. It is Consciousness that shape reality as the vibrational energy emitted from someone's Consciousness has the power to rearrange particles to respond to that particular vibrational energy. We know that particles change their behaviour once observed, perhaps particles and Consciousness are deeply intertwined in the sense that Consciousness needs particles to create a sense of separation which allows the experience of an individual self. My body and myself need other creatures to experience the individual self. Space and time are also necessary for this "human" experience to unfold because each one of us has a story. However, it is all an illusion because there is no real separation of the self, Consciousness is ONE and even if we can't grasp it rationally we can feel it. Somebody hurt a dog and everything was recorded on camera then broadcasted on UA-cam. Why do we feel sad for that dog and why do we want to protect it and nourish the dog with our love? Entanglement! Everything is ONE and that ONE is made of L O V E!
dylans voice no one has the theory of everything yet, and all we can do is speculate, so atleast we can appreciate trying to come as close as possible in this present time to define a theory of everything, one step at a time closer to the goal, it’s an adventure, we should stay openminded, yet skeptical like you, and not let beliefsystems and ignorance stop us.
When referring to "the speed of light" most people, in fact, most scientists, fail to acknowledge that the "speed" of anything can only be measured AGAINST something that is "still" or "not moving". Irwin says that "something moving at the speed of light will not experience time" ... relative to what other object? Does it matter if you are traveling toward or away from the object? What happens to doplar at the speed of light? If the entire universe were "moving at the speed of light", everything within the universe would look as normal as the bowl of soup in front of you. It is relative. If the speed of light is some kind of absolute, it only approaches the absolute relative to the thing that is not moving at the speed of light, or, more accurately, moving in another direction at the speed of light. So nothing reaches any magical state as it approaches a certain speed unless it is viewed in comparison to the counter-moving object. The high rate of speed makes such comparison extremely difficult because the counter-moving object is instantly so far away. Traveling the speed of light, to the experience of the traveler, is just the same as traveling at any other speed unless there is a collision. In that case, the only difference is how badly smashed your hood, engine and front tires are.
I took your feedback here to Klee. Here's the input he gave. The notion of relative time invented by Einstein was based on a presumption. They presumed that spacetime has no substructure. Now, if that is true, it would be illogical to say that something is moving relative to space. And one can only conceive of motion relative to some other object in space. However, many modern approaches to quantum gravity are exploring the idea of taking quantum mechanics so seriously that we seek to quantize space itself into indivisible quanta or chunks of space, fitting together according to a dynamical code, like a 3D mosaic tiling language. With this newer thought in mind, one can now actually have motion relative to this substructure and not only relative to other objects as particle-like patterns propagating in the substructure. With respect to the notion of “time”, this is a tough thing to discuss in just a few words. But I’ll try. Einstein conceived of time as an abstract and somewhat enigmatic thing. He was smart about it and had very good reason, which is an experiment that shows that if you accelerate something, it will experience time more slowly. Special relativity has an inverse proportionality between propagation and the experience of time such that if something moves at the speed limit of the universe, its time slows to zero. Salam and Pati conceived of the notion of an electron with substructure. Nowadays, most physicists view an electron as a dimensionless point. And de Broglie conceived of the idea of an electron clock. So imagine for a moment the notion of a universe on a checker board. Let’s call that the substructure of spacetime. Now, let’s say that each time you move your checker around in a circle on a 2x2 set of four squares, it completes one cycle of its clock in this toy model. But what if I gave you 8 moves and allowed you to also move this little particle clock model forward. If you chose to, you could decide not to move it forward at all and to simply rotate it two times on your 2x2 squares to complete two full cycles of the clock. So, in this sense, your particle has experienced the maximum number of clock cycles - the maximum experience of time at the cost of experiencing no propagation forward on the checker board. However, what if you spent some of your 8 moves to propagate the little pattern forward? What would occur? Of course, you would do that at the cost of clock cycles. You would trade in some clock cycles in exchange for moving the particle forward. There would be a sort of inverse proportionality between the particle’s experience of time and its propagation relative to the 8 possible moves. For 8 moves, is there a limit to how far you can move your particle? Yes indeed. This toy model gives you some feel for why the universe would have a speed limit. For some number of frames in this animation, say 8 frames, you cannot move your particle forward any further than 8 squares. That is the speed limit, analogous to the speed of light.
Thank you for that reply. So, by your checkerboard analogy, it would appear that the effects of reduction in "time" would be a function of acceleration, not speed, because speed itself would not require the dedication of modified checker moves to move the checker in space. Once motion is established, in the absence of friction, the motion continues without contribution of resources such as the modified checker move (Newton). If frictionless motion were constant at any speed, where no energy was required to influence motion, the resources to operate the clock would be fully available, and time would not be compressed. The other question is whether the impediment of the operation of a clock actually changes time, or simply makes the clock inaccurate to a universal constant of time. Has any experiment such as Cern allowed the interaction of particles, one of which has been put into a different "time" by speed or acceleration?
I think, if you get close to lightspeed, the speed of anything (material) else is irrelevant - since it is wayyy slower than you would be :) and you would experience the doppler effect, you would not see light the way you see it at "normal" speeds, everything becomes tunnel-like distorted. Relative to other "objects" you would still not exceed lightspeed - spacetime would bend to ensure, that lightspeed remains absolute ;)
To me, this theory seems very intuitive, as if ive always known the world according to these rules. In trying to describe it to others ive been unable to explain it as clear as Klee. I wonder what the rest of the current theortical physicists think of this languge.
I love the Idea, I beleive the crystal replesention could be projected as the shape and dimention of the pyramyd of Gysa. the pyramid has 8 dimentions that looks like 4 and projets as three, also built with the golden ratio as well as when multiplid by the size of its self and using pi it equals to the speed of light. perhaps that is what they were trying to tell as in a amessage through time and space. using the pyramid would be like the past revealing to the present and the present revealing the past. just a thought ! anyhow great work ! keep at it !
On the idea that "100% of the matter in the universe can organize into a consciousness", by Irwin's example, biology can only organize into consciousness when it is fed with additional biological resources. So, for instance, outer space and places where chemical and material resources are limited in certain ways, those areas cannot organize into biological resources and therefore cannot organize into consciousness in the way of biology as we know it. If it is possible for consciousness to organize in 100% of the universe as Irwin suggests, then there would almost certainly have to be a form of consciousness that is not biological, and if that is the case, chances are the universe has already organized into that consciousness, or was conscious in that way from the beginning, if there was a beginning. This would explain why quantum synchronicity happens now, and not just in theory in the future after biology might invade and "consciousify" the rest of the universe. So, mankind will not necessarily evolve until his consciousness biologically consumes or permeates every last atom in the universe. It is egocentric to think that our consciousness is destined to swallow the universe or that our biology can project into every possible hostile nano-milimeter in the universe. It is far more plausible that what we see as our consciousness, which is obviously extremely limited, is simply a small fragment of universal consciousness that our particular bodies happen to borrow in a particular way from the greater consciousness of the universe. Just as our eyes only see a small slice of photonic spectrum, our particular consciousness may have been selected from a much larger field that is mostly inaccessible to our biology. Just as we feel we can see everything when we cannot, we feel we are capable of total consciousness, but we may be utterly incapable of full-spectrum consciousness in our biological character. This puts us in a much more realistic perspective as simply another inhabitant of the universe, not the egotistically imagined "central driving dynamic of the universe's destined evolution". Like toads or asteroids, humans are just borrowers and carriers of a tiny selection of the universe's vast physical, energetic and conscious mass and variety. Our destiny is not to bring our consciousness to the universe, it is to expand our own consciousness to explore that pre-existing and wider conscious realm, just as we may use our legs to explore spaces beyond where we may be standing. This is explored in some studies of the pineal gland. Being the most intelligent species is no more special than being the fastest-running or the hairiest.
Again, got feedback from Klee on this: When you say “biology”, you may be speaking of things made of DNA, carbon, etc. However, those things are made of the same fundamental electrons and quarks as things that you would say are not biological. And perhaps those two things are made of one fundamental thing - a quantum of space. For us, these are the tetrahedra that we project mathematically from the 8D lattice called E8. So here, if we do away with a hard line in the sand between biological and non-biological, we can focus on self-organization of the pattern. I’m not saying there is not something deep and special about biology. In fact, this is the most sophisticated form of self-organization of energy that we know of in the universe. And it is the only place where most scientists and lay people can agree that consciousness has emerged. With respect to your thought about what came first, the chicken or the egg; consider observing how you think in linear time. This is natural and normal for us human animals. But mathematically, there is no serious logical problem with the notion that A caused B, which caused C, which caused A. Certain interpretations of quantum mechanics (David Bohm) and certain experiments (retrocausal quantum eraser double slit experiment), allow one to talk without complete craziness about retrocausal feedback loops. Furthermore, in the early 2010s, a team in Israel showed how two particles can be quantum entangled over time. This is very weird because it means that if you change the spin of one such particle back here in 2017, you instantly change the spin of its quantum entangled mate back in 1999 or in 2025 or wherever in time it is separated. Now, by the axiom that whatever is possible physically happens, given enough time, all energy in the universe may have self-organized into a network of conscious systems, where the whole system is conscious. I consist of about 180 pounds of energy that self-organized (some energy expressed as mass) into Klee-ness - something that sort of seems conscious and possesses freewill. It’s hard to define consciousness in a manner we can agree on. But at least most scientists agree consciousness exists. In any event, there is certainly no principle in physics that places an upper bound on the percentage of the universe that can self-organize into consciousness, the way I did and you did. And it is entirely unclear within the current state of physics re: what the extent of quantum entanglement in the universe is and how much more it can self-organize into a quantum neural network of entanglement. Retrocausality appears to be a rigorous and plausible view, although, without a final quantum gravity theory, there will be plenty of opportunity for argument. But let’s just be hypothetical for a moment. Let’s say that (1) the universe can live long enough that the inevitable self-organization of all energy into consciousness occurs. (2) let us pretend that retrocausal feedback loops and the universe as a sort of quantum neural net is physically plausible. If these two things were true, then what is the most logical conjecture one can make about what the substrate is for the origin of this geometric code (ones like what we work with)? It might be the future states where the universe becomes virtually or literally 100% self-organized quanta of space/energy into consciousness. That is, such a vast mind-like object could hold within itself, abstractly, the abstract elements of the code from which it self-actualized itself via evolutionary emergence. The beginning would be the mother of the end-point and the end-point would be the mother of the beginning. As fantastical as this idea seems, it has two qualities: First, it is logically consistent in every way. And, second, it is fully explanatory with no remaining unanswered questions or aggressive axioms/assumptions. For more detail on this, see: www.researchgate.net/publication/315845059_The_Code_Theoretic_Axiom_the_Third_Ontology
Im wondering if you are consciously or if this is a just by chance, making references ou drawing on the ideas of Terrence Mckenna? As doubtful and exotic his methods of inquiry may have been, he was, even though in a less scientific fashion, getting to conclusions very near to those your propose about reality. In particular, he was speaking of a
Wow! I know this is too much skepticism and pardon me for asking this but based on your explanation can the "2 D CROP CIRCLE QUASI STRICTURES" be an advanced geometric message from a higher dimension? Can that be possible?
At least someone explores new ways of thinking to explain our reality. String Theory with its 11 dimensions appears to be just a construct to fulfill a mathematical requirement but fails to explain reality
The focus is on the observer and the observed not the observation itself. I have a few questions concerning this. Quantum entanglement? What if there is no actual entanglement? What if there is one particle and it's reflection? We can look at the positive and negative charged particles. It would make sense to me that the 2 entangled particles are one and the same. The mirror effect. As I view reality I see how all that is created is determined by specific frequencies and vibrations. Our minds work as translators of these frequencies. So what creates frequency and vibration? The observer. The observer emits sound. This creates waves. Particles are in continuous motion. Particles vibrate to music that surrounds them. The unobservable force. It's unobservable because it's observation in itself. I see the connection with the double slit experiment, the phantom effect caused by DNA and the big bang itself. So to observe the observer emits sound creating the wave pattern of the particle. The phantom effect would be the sound emitted by the DNA when put in the vacuum with particles and this sound remains in the vacuum holding the particles in place. This for me leads to dark energy. The fabric of existence. The other creative force. The unobservable force. Observation. As sound creates all into existence through observation. My view of the big bang..so if there was a spherical structure possibly a crystal and let's say a sound was emitted within this crystal sphere. All these sound waves would come crashing into a single point creating a friction that would spring forth a light particle. As the sound continues crashing into itself a huge build up of particles occur that ultimately would explode into existence. All particles would span out and within the grid of sound and light other explosions at each intersection would occur springing forth created forms. The result of this friction would be electricity and electro magnetic forces. As sound weakens so does the created structure. Entropy occurs. I know this is very much in layman's terms. I'm not a physisicts. This is also a very simplified description. I'd appreciate feedback and thoughts. Thank you
So if the first 3 dimensions are coordinates in 3D space, shouldn't we assume the others are also coordinates? If we are all one consciousness then: 1. Height 2. Length 3. Depth 4. Time/Speed - Different speed different time 5. Size/mass (human, atom, galaxy, etc.) 6. Individual Consciousness/ the experiencer/ Ego/ Perception/Dream/Thought/Sleep - (this is where electrons rotate their axis and pop in and out of this reality - from perception/to dream/ to thought) 7. Spirit / Flow/ Tao/ the experience/ the Present Moment - different Tao - different universe 8. Self (Brahma/god/original consciousness) This is also the building block of all matter. It is the information/the energy. 3D object projects a 2D object with light (a shadow). A 4D object (soul) projects a 3D object (human) with light. Because in the 4D of time/space it is an extrapolation of who we are over time. Our soul.
:-) This might be the best description of reality i've ever heard. This is mind blowing wonderful stuff. As a psychedelic, this concurs with my intuition about reality, perfectly. It's provided the structure for what i feel. Thank you so much. Amazing stuff!
First of all, great video ! A possibility that is not mentioned is this: What if consciousness is not emerging from ever more organized "physical" structures, (after all, everything is pointing out to the fact that what we call "physical" is really Information)? What if, instead of that, it is all the way around? ie. what we perceive as organized structures is the "projection" or the "result" of ever more organized data structures at an information level, and those growing levels of organization (lower entropy, lower Shannon entropy) is what gives rise to higher consciousness levels? So, maybe it is not that "complex, organized physical things" generate consciousness, but the other way around, higher leves of consciousness, ie. lower levels of Shannon entropy, are perceived at our "physical" level of perception as virus, bacteria, amoeba, fish, cats, dogs, monkeys, primates, dolphins and humans. Just another approach... (and sorry, maybe I've should have switch the order of the last two: humans and then dolphins ;-)
Just maybe the state of nonexistence is conscious. Many nothingness can emerge and form bigger nothingnesses. Nothingnesses don’t need a reason or proof to exist.
Here is an exert from Margaret Storms book called "The Return of the Dove" where she talks of our needing to repair the tattered patterns back into triangles in order to evolve. The etheric body contains all records, all memories of past lives, back to the very beginning of our individualization as White Fire Beings. The etheric body is what modern scientists call the subconscious, which is perhaps as good a name as any other providing its meaning is clearly understood. At the present time the term is used glibly and in a meaningless manner. That situation will have to be changed because a person with a clogged etheric body can make little evolutionary progress. He must understand clearly that the etheric records of bad habits must be transmuted so that the tiny etheric filaments are clean and firmly woven in a perfect pattern of triangles. Wherever the etheric body registers disease or disharmony of any kind the tiny filaments become disarranged and tattered. These records of disharmony remain until transmuted. Meanwhile they are built in, embodiment after embodiment. A striking example of the horrible after-effects of war memories retained by the etheric body, is now being illustrated on a world-wide scale. It seemed very noble back in 1940 to train young men to march forth and kill the enemy. Now the bewildered public wonders why we have so much juvenile delinquency. The answer is that many boys who were killed in World War II are back in embodiment, with their etheric memories of violence freshly imprinted on their subtle bodies. The sight of a gun, of a blood-and-thunder TV show or movie, membership in a street gang, or even a family argument is sufficient to stir these etheric records into violent upheavals. Yet the public remains captive to churchianity, militarism and death, resolutely refusing to even investigate the glorious possibilities of living in a clean and wholesome world.
I contest free will, to me it is more like free choice, as presented to you by life. If I had free will, I would not have to be restricted by law or morality. Free choice, makes you responsible for every action, it is very grounding.....free will puts you into a more ethereal thinking.
You're very goode at explaining things !!!! Consciousness defines, not creates, reality. Thus, it defines what is real. Reality changes as consciousness develops. Reality is both random and deterministic. A timeline is a purely spacetime Newtonian path that complies with causality and it is thus deterministic. Yet, different Newtonian timelines can criss-cross and one can pick up a different timeline according to the level of consciousness. The intersecting points may appear, at first glance, random but the decision when to shift timelines is defined outside spacetime and, again, has to do with the level of consciousness one is at. I suspect that the use of language is totally deterministic, causal, but free will is outside spacetime and depends on the consciousness level or focus one is at. It can be said that consciousness is like a field, unbounded and continuous i.e., it must spread throughout time and space. Therefore, everything is conscious, from the simplest structure to the most complex e.g., from a quark to a galaxy and beyond. Yet, conscious does not necessarily mean self-conscious. One can simply say conscious means being aware (again, not necessarily being self-aware). Consciousness implies perception and reaction, both according to a pre-programmed "code". The level of sensing and reaction can be expressed, mechanically in degrees of freedom, which is equivalent to degrees of consciousness. A mineral can "sense" a change in properties and react (mechanically, chemically). A photon can sense a change and react, and so on. Increasing degrees of freedom means becoming more aware of the surroundings and of itself and it is equivalent to accessing a more complex pre-programed code until one starts to become more self-aware and free-will begins to develop. Seth talks about consciousness units, which may be analogous not only to quanta but also to degrees of consciousness. Consciousness does not spring from the laws of physics or from any theory; consciousness creates theories. Discover = Dis + Cover = remove the cover. Knowledge is analogous to consciousness, a field unbounded and continuous. All what scientists and inventors do is to dis-cover what's already everywhere As shown in a paper, we teleport all the time without being aware and without technologies. If space and time were collapsed, everything and all would be packed together; there is no distance. Time and space represent a way that energy is coded so if space were secondary, it means that is also primary, which means space is a translation. Our minds interpret part of energy as space, thus space can also be translated in another form.
![Hacking Reality [Official Film]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vJi3_znm7ZE/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for being real, and putting it in a way that is understandable for normal people.
My brother
For being “real” 🤔
You obviously didn’t understand anything 🤣 what is real ? And what is normal ?
As a physicist, I agree.
No point starting with 300 pages of calculus.
@@noompsieOG 🙄🙂 the linguistic symbol "real" having more than one working meaning, of course
Why do u assume any of us are normal?
Klee... I salute you for being such a great communicator of extremely complicated concepts. Your ability to speak clearly, concisely and comprehensibly on a number of complex subjects is simply amazing. You are truly unique, in my view. Thank you.
Thank you so much!
ditto
Years ago I had the idea that everything we see and do, our external reality, was a symbol of our internal reality. Sort of like a dream but more immediate, where as dreams are more of a future projection or past reflection from a different perspective of symbols who arent limited by external physics. Now, what I have found is that focus on desired outcomes creates desired outcome but, the more focus you have the more the outcome is closer to the desire. Usually around 3-6months for it to start appearing. Then there is the whole jinxing situation, another story. Anyway, what Im saying here is that Ive started to see how consciousness plays a part on reality. Some of it is pretty obvious while others can go unnoticed. Interesting to see some physicists getting into it to explain it in a mathematical way.
I think the tetrahedron is the internal world (thought) and the external world is a grouping of five tetrahedron forming a cube. (although it seems to be many shapes moving around, inside and outside each other while expanding and contracting at the same time) Sort of like for something to exist in the external, it needs to be formed by five ideas.
Cant wait to see what you guys come up with next :)
BellyFlopping wow, that was brilliant! Your comment made my day.
Thank you for this patient and thorough explanation of such difficult concepts. I can't grasp it all, but you have given a powerful framework for further thought. I have no capability in physics so I especially appreciate your careful explanation of current thinking in terms that are accessible to those of us not educated in your field.
Mind blown! After watching it was like the floodgates to creative reasoning just burst wide open. My first thought concerned the question of consciousness. I just spontaneously thought, why would anyone immediately leap to saying ’if there is a code then there is a meaning and that proves god’ I mean why go to the most complex form of consciousness before we can quantify or describe its smallest component? Of course after this I started to ponder on what that could be.
It struck me that at this moment, I felt more conscious than I had felt in a long time; so I figured that the answer was hiding somewhere in my experience of watching your video. All of the information and new perspectives was definitely a part of it; but even more the way it made me feel.
This led to me trying to understand and clarify to myself, how the the act of watching this video could provoke such a response. Here is my attempt:
The topic of the video is far beyond my level of education, so it is not information that I easily digest. My cognitive process basically started from deciphering basic symbols. I have always had a problem with understanding math; but this time, math became visual.
In my mind I could see how the process took place. It was like I had a pile of Legos in front of me and beyond that I could see a structure in the making, being built by blocks of different colour, falling on top of each other in a specific order. In an attempt to understand where each piece was supposed to fit I started building my own structure; first sorting the pieces in my pile of Legos to replicate the pattern of the structure I saw, and then trying to forsee what the next piece would be. All of a sudden the two structures mirrored each other, but that’s not all. They not only lined up, not only looked the same - they interacted! I could forsee what block would fall next, and thus I could join in on building the first structure. I placed a lego and the next pice that fell linked to mine! The sensation that followed was immediate. I felt my consciousness expand.
The conclusion I drew from this exercise was that consciousness is pattern synchronisation. When I could line up with the pattern, when my own building blocks were reorganised to harmonize with the falling Legos, a new awareness was made.
This way of looking at the process appealed to me. My next step was to try to find the most miniscule symbol and response-situation, I also asked myself if that necessarily constitutes consciousness. For some reason what I visualized now was little balls falling at an angle against a glass surface, through which I was watching. At first one ball hit the surface and bounced back while continuing the fall; then more and more balls followed. At first it seemed chaotic. Balls falling against the surface, bouncing back, hitting other balls, creating a response… but when I turned up the flow, and mentally shrunk the size of the balls to grains of sand; I could see how a self Organizing pattern emerged. A pattern devoid of consciousness.
Then it hit me. That means that code can exist without a conscious code creator or conscious code reader. Just after the thought had popped up I had to smile at myself. When it hit It felt groundbreaking but just a second later i realised that it’s Basic. ”No one believes that a computer is conscious, just because it can read and react to code…” but then I felt another jolt hit. ”True, but you just saw the computer come into existence without a creator”.
I felt a really weird energy pumping within me. I really loved it and wanted to continue asking questions and look for answers. Actually I couldn’t stop it. I knew I had to sleep and switch my mindset to the more trivial questions of labouring for bread and shelter. Pushing the sensations I felt into a box seemed impossible though.
This made me remember how I once learned to juggle. I practiced like crazy one evening without really getting the hang of it, and then I fell asleep. Imagine my surprise the next day when I picked up the juggling set to continue my practice; only to realize that I had learned how to do it during my sleep. This memory helped me to calm down a bit. Perhaps what I needed to grasp the next level of understanding, was time for my brain to play with the Legos on its own… without the conscious mind interfering. Perhaps that will self organise the bits of information into even more wonderful patterns…
This is great. Really clear, and some of the most exciting thinking on physics I've seen on UA-cam.
Thank you, Colin!
Completely agree. A fascinating topic explained brilliantly.
Wow, I am impressed. I am equally impressed by your ability to explain, as the subject matter itself.
I would be lost with the associated mathematics, but your ability to explain intuitively is very impressive. To the point even I understood the basic principles behind your reasoning.
Thank you.
Glad it was helpful! Thank you for watching!
If you've watched this video and still need more science, check out our new film Hacking Reality!
ua-cam.com/video/vJi3_znm7ZE/v-deo.html
Is there an 8-dimensional "engine" behind our universe? Join Marion Kerr on a fun, visually exciting journey as she explores a mysterious, highly complex structure known simply as 'E8'--a weird, 8-dimensional object that for some, strange reason, appears to encode within it all of the particles and forces of our 3-dimensional universe.
quantum gravity research? hadnt even heard of or thought of the concept. diving in the rabbit hole now. very curious. adios
I’ve been studying/researching quantum mechanics, neuroscience, philosophy, and other esoteric writings seeking the same answers and it’s so exciting to see it all coming together in a cohesive way with your eloquent theory of everything. The ideas your talking about here are not foreign to me at all and I look forward to watching the progression of your research! These breakthroughs you are making have huge implications and real world applications, and will most certainly usher us into a Star Trek age, as you know. :) Thank you and your team for all you’re doing and are about to do for humankind! (Or technically have already done since we live in only the beautiful, spacious present.) 😊
Same here let's connect on fb or email ? Would like to have a discussion with someone like me 😂
jame conradi email is best I don’t really do social media, Kristen.sotelo25@gmail.com, look forward to some thought provoking conversations!
The unification theory is basically akin to the Hindu concept called "the net of Indra"
TS Yes, I would add that it’s imbedded in many different ancient myths, traditions, and religions from around the world that were geographically isolated at the time of the writings. Interesting they all they all same thing though....
@@kristensotelo4212 yes that is very true, we find very similar concepts in religions. Of course there were some influence between religions & one good example is the Persian influence we find in the Christian new testament - after the Persians conquered Judea & the Jewish people came into contact with the Zoroastrian religion & its concepts such as good v evil, loyal followers are resurrected after death, god will bring his wrath onto the world etc (these are totally new concepts borrowed from Persia & incorporated into Christianity), but even so, it still doesnt account for the host of inherent similarities we observe across all religions. I think a good example is also the construction of pyramids we find in cultures that had no contact with each other & yet so many built the same structures.
Ive come across multiple theories as to why this is & perhaps the most plausable ive seen thus far is the theory that humanity is actually older than we think & did in fact survive certain mass extinction events with people being seperated due to natural disaster events causing them to form new groups, migrate & possibly try to perpetuate historical knowledge through religious concepts, structures etc. The recent discovery of Gobekli Tepe totally transformed our historical knowledge of humanity & it was discovered just a few years ago. We are still unearthing our history to this very day so who knows what else we could find & perhaps most importantly, who knows what has been lost & can never be recovered
api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2016/01/150120-gobekli-tepe-oldest-monument-turkey-archaeology
Just found your channel - and really enjoyed this video. As a non-scientist I greatly appreciate your ability to translate your work into a language I can follow. Extremely interesting and I look forward to watching additional videos.
Thank you!
Klee Irwin is not only a very intelligent man, but above all, extremely brave to dare to go to the farthest edges of current science and put in the insane effort of trying to explain what is - likely - possible. I have so much respect for him! Investing his wealth and his time into much needed research which is insanely fascinating to me and a friend, we watch his videos in awe with a beamer that projects it on a wall and then we engage in a discussion that lasts for hours and hours. Love it!
Thank you, Janne!
@@QuantumGravityResearch You are welcome and thanks for your videos!
Can never watch this too many times. Never gets old. And every time I watch this lecture I take back something new. In fact I had to watch a couple times before slightly understanding. A lot to take in here and Klee does a good job at leimening it.
Thank you so much!
Since (assuming) information is entropy and entropy is the missing part of energy after it went through a cycle of exchanges, therefore information is not energy but rather 'spent' energy, and reality is 'spent' enegy.
You're a very good communicator
Thank you!
Reality is a probablity system, conscious intent modifies the otherwise random draw from the probablity within it's natural uncertainty. So, it's not determanistic or random. It's a simple loop at the smallest scale: Next state is current state modified by conscious intent operating on the random draw from a probability wavefunction within it's natural uncertainty. And at large scale you get statistical results and that's why everythng seems solid and objective.
The reason why C is a constant is because it always moves exactly 1 pixel each itteration of the inner loop. if you think about the simulation speed:
Δx = 1,616199e-35 meters (planck length)
C = 299792458 meters per second (speed of light)
Δt = Δx / C (speed = distance over time)
Δt = 5,3910595709515814437199751035765e-44 seconds
(our simulation speed, asuming Δx = planck length)
For me your comment is a great summary. I am right now reading Tom Campbell's My Big TOE (Theory of Everything), I recommend it. I don't know if you know about it, but it's totally in line with your comment. Regards !
Yes, it's Tom's model !
Great Shaun ! Thanks for letting me know. Are you participating in Tom's teachings other than the trilogy and UA-cam, like video chats or in the physical seminars?
Well, after searching for many years, I stumbled on MBT. After reading the book and watching many of the lectures I found that it did explain many of my questions. Then I fought with it for about 3 years trying to break the logic, and I still do that. But so far nothing has even put a dent in it. Now that there are (QM) physics experiments pending we will have to see how that goes, but if they produce the predicted results then it will be no less than a paradigm shift in our understanding of reality. In the mean time MBT has already been a personal paradigm shift, as I have gathered my own experience of it, it's daily value is immense. But I still look at many alternative theories like the QGR, I feel they are all converging on the same model.
So, I do like to participate in facebook/youtube convo's. I don't feel the need to go to the seminars nor do I have the time for it :)
All right Shaun, thanks for your comment. Yeah, lets hope that someone conducts the proposed experiments as soon as possible, and sure enough, the results will be shocking, one way or another. I am more or less in the same path, but I guess behind you for what you say. I hope your search of other alternatives brings you closer and closer to what you want to know and be. Best regards and thanks again.
I love to listen to Klee speak. So articulate. I wonder constantly about the nature of reality and I'm so glad he does too because his ideas are profound.
Thank you! So happy you have been enjoying!
Hi Klee, I'm going with "described by information". Also, consciousness. What if, everything in some way was conscious? Even space-time. I need space-time to be the observer of gravity to get rid of the notion of dark matter. Then space-time is a "participant observer", which for me is what consciousness means. Perhaps I'm wrong to equate consciousness, but should we not attempt to tie down what consciousness is first? As ridiculous as this might sound; maybe zero should be replaced with the notion of consciousness. I can't think of anything that can really be described by zero, except the origins in our coordinate systems. One cool aspect to no zero is obviously no singularities. But consciousness? Phi? It's there but why?
Very keen to hear your explanation for gravity.
Klee, you've done a great production with this very clear and concise presentation. Your thoughts about consciousness experiencing NO TIME due to the speed of light are interesting. I theorize that the death of the human body causes the soul/consciousness to experience NO TIME as well. Until the point at which that consciousness incarnates again... and again, through multiple dimensions.
Death, physical death, is Just an illusion. Consciousness is eternal. Whether you get grouped with the angelic or the demonic, after physical death, is the real story. Be careful what you choose in this life. It's not only a classroom, but it's also a test 😉
I think the sole fact that random number generators are effectively impossible is proof positive the universe is not random.
incredibly fascinating , I really think that you are on to something with your work. From what I've learned regarding quantum physics over the years, this real feels like you are connecting the dots from all different parts of science.
Thank you for trying to explain your work in laymen terms.
So essentially we're a self-referential, 3D projected organically regenerating fractal and potentially a comically bad subroutine within an operating system that is sentient but within rules of a 8D crystal sandbox code written by a malicious or bored alien programmer from the future and the past wanting to get a better grade on his programming paper in that dimension. But we created them, or will, once we become aware of them, and then they'll have moved on and it will be a movie by Ridley Scott.
I wonder what Klee would experience if he took 4 g of dried psilocybin mushrooms
Shh we need him where he's at, there's enough religions already 😂
Ive taken various psychedelic drugs like Psilocybin, DMT, LSD etc. I always see the same geometry & it just seems to flow out of nowhere. This brings up a question, is this geometry real & we enter a new conciousness thus allowing us to perceive it OR is it just a chemical reaction bringing forth what is already within the mind? Regardless of the answer, both are equally amazing to think about. If it is just a chemical reaction there is so much more to the mind than what we can comprehend
I thinking about the same. Its interesting
Have you ever seen a sparkly connective net in front of you on DMT??
you are an amazing speaker, able to articulate such complexity with ease. I admire you a lot! I know you will discover incredible things and share them, for which I am excited!
Thanks, Susannah!
The fact that you know I exist now is pretty exciting. I know...groupies. I really am excited. If your ever in Sonoma County speaking, please let me know...I would love to come hear you.
up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, a, b, a, b
The hypothetical exclusion of God led to the remarkable progress of modern science in the past three centuries. But emancipation from clerical dogma was gained by the price of accepting one paradox: The exclusion of the transcendent is itself a dogma.
Irwin explains a way, to ease this paradox out, by saying: God may or may not exist - it simply does not play a role for science, God will never deliver an explanatory advantage because in the end science will ask: So, why does God do this, and how did he came to existence?
Funny thing is, on psychadelics (psyllocibin,lsd,DMT) sometimes you get visuals that can cause super symmetry, like looking in a mirror, your brain can not comprahend which half of your face it should take to symmetrize.
Sometimes it causes you to see mandalas similar to E8 with the naked eyes. The geometric shapes shift and move like four dimensonal objects, while the shapes and colorings that make up the crystal/mandala, represent information of your preception.
Weird stuff, only learned about quantum mechanics and sciences after i took shrooms. And the similarities are uncanny.
This is a wonderfully cogent explanation of the latest thinking in quantum mechanics and our search for an explanation of everything. Enthralling and accessible! Thank you Klee. Thank you QGR.
WOW; what a magnificent teacher!
Don't use the word random as the opposite of deterministic. The opposite of deterministic is nondeterministic. Random is a group statistical property.
yeh. so true its not "random" even though the quantum foam may appear so. like ripples on the ocean making peaks and troughs, collisions, whirls etc. but at the core each point particle interaction of causality in a complex structure mkes up the slices of momentum and energy of points at a given time. have enough slices can predict what can happen, but these orders of thermodynamics and rules apply to closed systems If I'm not mistaken. in most cases its not closed systems so you cnnot attribute certain properties.
Well we don't know if the universe exhibits deterministic complexity or if it's non-deterministic. Cryptography tells us that regardless, you can't tell the difference beyond a sufficiently high computational bound. We certainly do observe randomness in quantum physics but we don't yet get to know if that randomness is the result of deterministic or non-deterministic laws.
There are no words that can convey the sensation of being. We just are.
Really excited to see more people getting on board with taking these kinds of ideas seriously. Oh, the times they are a changin'...
The dampening and amplification of corresponding wave function is something i never really thought of until i viewed this video...
I think this guy Klee is awesome. Seems very intelligent and articulate. Very good at conveying the idea to someone like me, who knows a little but not much. Thanks for the video!
That was something of a tour de force. May the force be with you. Time to decompress . . .
Great video. I have a question? You say that unlike string theory, there is no need to invent or create other dimensions right? But then why do you need an 8 dimension crystal to cast a 3d image we can see? isn't this theory also dependent on additional dimensions for it to work? That part confused me and if you or anyone can help me with that would be awesome. I've watched your vids dozens of times and I'm starting to put it together. Thank you so much for this.
Wow, fascinating work, I hope it does unify and with time fitting in nicely too.
41:15 nit: to exceed the number of basic particles in the universe you would need to double 266 times, or multiply by ten 80 times.
Fabulous stuff Klee! Must be so exciting to be part of a team working at the frontier of such a fundamental knowledge. Do you need a software developer in your team with great enthusiasm and love for mathematics and physics?
It's not quite true that an object is "anything that can be thought of" but is rather "a thing, as known". The thing doesn't have to be known and may exist without a knower or in the absence of a knower, but an object presupposes a knower.
This is one of the most interesting videos I have come across! This is an invitation to see a new interpretation of quantum mechanics with the mathematics of quantum mechanics representing the physics of ‘time’ as a geometrical interactive process of energy exchange. In this theory we have an emergent future unfolding photon by photon that forms the ever changing world of our everyday life. With classical physics representing process over a period of time as in Newton’s deferential equations.
Why is the E8 crystal projected down specifically to the E4 quasicrystal?
What is so special/particular about E4?
Does it have special properties physically?
Does it have a more efficient language and symbols?
Why not use the projections of E7, E6, E5, E2, E1?
What is this specific angle used in the E4 projection? Why is this specific angle chosen? Was it mathematically derived? Can you provide a visual animation of this angle and projection?
When a higher order crystal is projected down to a lower dimension, is any information lost in the projection? Is information fully preserved?
When recreating a higher order crystal from a lower order projection are there any errors in the recreation with information provided by a lower dimension quasicrystal?
Is the binary language the most efficient language in the universe? Mathematically?
Explain why the E3 quasicrystal has a more efficient language than the E4 quasicrystal. With the spin quantity.
Can you please provide animations and visual explanations of all the ideas that you presented in this discussion.
Thank you.
how'd he do this whole 1 hour 18 min speech without notes or cuts in recorded, damn
His description of emergence was excellent. And while there were many "mind blown" moments, my favorite is at 21:00: the likening of the organization of single celled organisms to create a complex organism with higher consciousness to a collection of single human consciousnesses to create a higher human consciousness. Then I thought of "herd mentality" and wonder if collective consciousness is something that is already happening whether we are aware or not. We may not reach a useful/practical collective consciousness until we create a unified collective consciousness and remove our petty individuality.
As a fruit grocer I'm proud to say my stacked oranges are GR-E8!
Ok, that was pretty epic. I'm surprised I made it all the way through; the discourse was very clear. Thanks very much!
Can you write an illustrated book? I don't quite follow
I have on many occasions and can absolutely 100% confirm that retro-causality is a real phenomenon and part of our reality. It can be accessed by becoming part of the language that defines us and our reality. Make the right 'choices' and you will activate that part of the program (ie entangle yourself with the source code) that affects the present by affecting the past. I kid you not.
Thank you Klee Irwin. Very revelatory and somewhat well organized. One organizing feature of your talk that I believe to be misguided is the inference that consciousness might choose to use humanity as a tool to increase its scope over the cosmos when it has already done so. The remaining task of consciousness might be to revel in its exploration of the mixing of the two domains of separateness and unity. As humans we are to proceed with the task. Onward.
So hypothetically, if this is all cogent, then it very neatly explains crop circles as geometric symbols representing themselves, sort of the same "pi" number sequence thing like in the movie "Contact" but only with the Golden Ratio, written in rye and wheat.
So...are we actually a universal consciousness experiencing itself subjectively?
Factor in a "zero point" geometry and infinity loops. They're scalable thru the focus/hub of the superposition zero matrix. This is the infinity gate which creates charges electrically as weak forces are combined from atom centres to atom centres forming a focus at the gravitational centre of that mass. Potential difference between a black hole zero point and another blackhole zero point creates a subspace current flow in the network or field of the fabric of space time.
Excellent job! Mind blown! Very well presented. Hat tip...
The most efficient system of code is not the one with the least amount of symbols or expressions, it is the code with the least amount of symbols and expression FOR THE PARTICULAR TASK to which the code is to be applied. Some tasks call for more complex code than other tasks. The most efficient code is that which has no more or less symbols and expression than necessary to perform the intended task.
Reality is a reflection of how we define everything. The reality that we define does not therefore exist outside of our mind. So what is real? Reality is a concept. Real is a concept. These are words in our vocabulary. Perceived reality reflects our collective understanding. It only a collective understanding because we educate our children to perceive the world in 'generic terms'. What exists beyond our collective understanding is as limitless as the potential for our minds. All the great sciences and technologies were created in the mind before they were created in the world. However, the motor vehicle is now real. Its a reflection of the mind. Reality 'does not' exist outside the mind.
It would be cool if you guys made a visual comparison of DNA versus the quasi-crystalline spin network.
We'll never get to see what's behind the "Curtain" as long as we believe a person's skin color, gender, or sexuality is a determinant factor of their inherent worth as human beings!! It is of paramount importance that as we progress in the sciences, that we progress in human compassion and understanding. The universe will not allow us to spread our hatreds, trash, and ecological destruction into its infinite realms!!!
Klee, you are great at explaining things that so complex and deep. It is very enjoyable.
Fascinating... thanks for your work. We need you.
Much appreciated!! More to come!
Could the Universe is based on one geometrical process forming, what some people call a primary code or reality code that forms the exchange of information that everything is based upon?
Best summary of current quantum theory and closest to a theory of everything I've ever heard, read or seen.
Excellent explanation of what this is all about. Can't wait to hear more.
There is quite a lot more. Check out their channel.
Scientific Awakening
Science today is addressing the issue of axiomatic philosophy, of what energy is, by acknowledging the possibility we exist within a non-deterministic or deterministic reality - in order to progress understanding.
The general consensus, within the community, is for the non-deterministic position where energy is: information that facilitates the holographic universe.
Put simply ... science is aware there is a physical and non-physical aspect which is described by the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.
The study of black-holes has shown objects (within the singularity) break down to their two-dimensional nature as the information reverts to the non-local state - when light cannot collapse the wave-function.
This made science realise the universe is holographic in nature because a hologram is created when light is used to create a three-dimensional image on a two-dimensional surface.
The two-dimensional surface, science has been studying, is the Relativity / Quantum Physics upon which light has the function of wave collapse - and that is facilitated by a conscious observer to create the three-dimensional hologram we inhabit.
This "holographic reality" is animated which means it is more sophisticated than any hologram we have created - but the basic principles are the same.
This is why science is (now) suggesting an eight-dimensional crystal lattice is being projected into the two-dimensional surface.
A hologram requires (cohesive) light, such as a laser, to be split into two in order to send one beam directly to a surface and the other beam onto an object which is projected onto the same two-dimensional surface to create the three-dimensional image.
Science is effectively attempting to describe the apparatus that creates the holographic universe, when they speak of eight-dimensional latices, because the crystal is the object that is "projected".
What does this mean?
Well ... to start with - science hasn't even begun to acknowledge the animation properties of the hologram which means they are ignoring a fundamental aspect of reality.
The wavefunction of light is fundamental.
More importantly ... they are struggling to appreciate the importance of the conscious observer - because they are aware it gives rise to philosophical axioms that undermine progress.
Technically speaking - science is telling us: if every conscious being was removed from reality - all of reality, as we know it, would disolve away.
...or would it?
If there is no creator, who exists beyond this reality, there would be no conscious being to facilitate the wave function - so it would disolve away.
They tackle this by saying the universe is a conscious entity - which is (basically) idolatry - and, as such, it self-organizes the coding to sustain the holographic nature of realiity.
Since the scripture has described the holographic nature of reality, from the position of a being that exists beyond space-time, this highlights the importance of "subjective" consciousness.
...which we (all) have.
Science is, essentially, describing the cage we are imprisoned within, when it speaks of the holographic universe, so it may be wise to consider why we are here.
The eight-dimensional latice, science speaks of, is also referred to in scripture as garments of glory - which means the spirit (personification of attitude) within the three-dimensional body has an eight-dimensional body being created as the spirit grows.
This is not a philosophical nor a religious position but it is axiomatic because the scripture confirms we live by faith.
This is because we can only be trustworthy if we are faithful - such as a husband and wife appreciate their love is founded upon trust and faithfulness.
Love is when the light is cohesive.
The hologram suffers malfunction, such as entropic decay, when the light is not cohesive - so it is crucial to appreciate: the spirit needs to grow before it can secure the garment it needs to exists beyond this reality.
Of course ... this is assuming one wants to receive their garments - or else: they can avoid asking why to continue asking how?
My Best Wishes To Everyone
www.white-flag-publishing.com
Yea more people should be reading this comment
Nonsense
@@ck58npj72
Actually ... the video is seeking to make sense of the available evidence (they acknowledge).
The fact you don't understand it - doesn't give you the right to assert your own ineptitude.
I understood it - so I am in a position to explain why their observations are in error.
Likewise ... if you can't make sense of my explanation - I suggest you return to fifth grade education.
Information is the form of each thing, event, place, time etc. It's definition or description that tells reality how to act. Another term is concept. Concepts are only conceived by minds. The one irreducible all things share is information. Concepts are written in the language of information which a mind must understand to perceive this concept with it's perception. Understand? The beginning and the end, both meaningless terms, is information and conciousness.
Your maths might be good, but your PHILOSOPHY determines everything. If one has no idea what consciousness is, how can one reduce it to fractal amounts? How can one assume that it emerged? How can one even determine that it is reducible at all? Every one of the basic ontological questions posed in this video posits matter as the origin, creator or birthplace of Consciousness.
There is another ontology that more closely adheres to Occam's Razor. *The Consciousness Only Ontology.* The ontology which posits _That All Matter And Energy Emerged Within The Field Of Consciousness. That All Reality exists _*_Within_*_ Consciousness._ That Consciousness is the ultimate all permeating all suffusing reality that totally envelops all reality and organizes (not according to the dictates of humanity, but more for his observation) all atoms, forces, energies etc as they inter-relate accordingly. The consciousness only ontology insists that all physical reality reality is merely the dance (or different vibratory expressions) of Consciousness. We posit that Materialism has reality in reverse or upside down...our paradigm is unapologetic that:
*_THE UNIVERSE EMERGED DEEP WITHIN CONSCIOUSNESS...NOT THE REVERSE._*
Yes. And sweetest part is that you can directly know it beyond any doubt.
Fantastic explanation. Very easy to understand. I'm impressed by Klee Irwin's ability to communicate all of this with what appears or so it seems, almost flawlessness in such length of time of 1 hour and 18 minutes without a script. Klee should definitely get an award for science communicator among other things. I don't know of anyone else or research firm taking the E8 quasicrystal research any further than QGR has since it was introduced by Garret Lisi.
I like where you are going with all of this. I really hope you guys are doing everything you can to seek funding for your research efforts. Publication of a paper would definitely be required, especially for federal funding. I think you guys are definitely leading and changing science and physics as we currently understand it. BRAVO! Look forward to more awesomeness.
Every theory ever thought of, whether recorded or not, leads back to a fundamental original source of all theories and steps of advancement of "thought". In the very nature of advancement of every human life in all its evident stages of pursuits, reasons and purposes from infancy to adulthood as well as the advancement of all humanity's collective thoughts, principles and theories in all of our history there is also a structure or "matrix" or cylical "process" of thought (I would reasonably believe it is related to the algorithmic idea of thought or consciousness as you point out in this video) that can be written on paper and understood and could serve as the center piece of every human being's template or guide so that we could all align in more agreement with one another how more and more clearly our existence and this world in which we emerge from, should be more commonly and better understood in everyone's hierarchy of thought structure. I would most certainly believe that such a centerpiece is ever so more important to introduce to the world and adopted as world population grows and there is higher propensity for more fatal conflict and also since we are currently preparing for habitation of other planets.
Also consider what is said of reality, experience and consciousness by Ted Nottingham in the video below. This relates to the Alpha, as in the triangle symbol used to depict change in mathematics as you pointed out your video.
25min20sec:
"Such is the nature of reality, this magical display of consciousness
The reality of your experience is the magical display of your own consciousness"
25min40sec:
"A change in consciousness brings about a corresponding change in the reality you encounter,
A change in the reality you encounter, is an expression of a change in consciousness."
ua-cam.com/video/lE5MFF2UNB4/v-deo.htmlm20s
Thank you Francisco! Are you a scientist?
I would like to think so. :) I know my comment is not the best of my writing and proper sentence structure, I was in a hurry. I am considering refining/editing it.
Is space-time not affected by gravity? If it’s affected by gravity how does it impact the reality of consciousness?
Space time is affected this would b the black hole where space time and light is effected by the extreme gravity of the black hole
joseph smith : a conscious dark hole (black hole) becoming (emerges) a biosphere using all the information that might be conserved as quasi crystals?
Definitely thought provoking ideas, but they seem to be a little bit speculative and 9-10 years behind the times of peer review: arxiv.org/pdf/0711.0770.pdf was a distilled version of the E8 unification concept, albeit without the whole consciousness and simulation aspects, and arxiv.org/pdf/0905.2658.pdf was the rebuttal. Is there a particular reason that your paper only lives on your site instead of ArXiv and going through the channels of peer review?
Collective Conciousness are you there?
This message took 11 months to reach us, but yes we are always here.
Amazing, this really seems to be the way to go for a unification theory. Congratulations!
Does consciousness exist? I don't know. Let me think about it.
What is Klee Irwin's take on Amit Goswami's theories, in particular, his notion (and book) of the self aware universe?
He described God without using the word, interesting.
No Adolf, he didn't. Sorry
Energy is the very fabric of everything, meaning that what we perceive as reality and everything in it, including ourselves is just particles dancing with each other. It is Consciousness that shape reality as the vibrational energy emitted from someone's Consciousness has the power to rearrange particles to respond to that particular vibrational energy. We know that particles change their behaviour once observed, perhaps particles and Consciousness are deeply intertwined in the sense that Consciousness needs particles to create a sense of separation which allows the experience of an individual self. My body and myself need other creatures to experience the individual self. Space and time are also necessary for this "human" experience to unfold because each one of us has a story. However, it is all an illusion because there is no real separation of the self, Consciousness is ONE and even if we can't grasp it rationally we can feel it. Somebody hurt a dog and everything was recorded on camera then broadcasted on UA-cam. Why do we feel sad for that dog and why do we want to protect it and nourish the dog with our love? Entanglement! Everything is ONE and that ONE is made of L O V E!
This is music to my brain and heart and ears
dylans voice no one has the theory of everything yet, and all we can do is speculate, so atleast we can appreciate trying to come as close as possible in this present time to define a theory of everything, one step at a time closer to the goal, it’s an adventure, we should stay openminded, yet skeptical like you, and not let beliefsystems and ignorance stop us.
When referring to "the speed of light" most people, in fact, most scientists, fail to acknowledge that the "speed" of anything can only be measured AGAINST something that is "still" or "not moving". Irwin says that "something moving at the speed of light will not experience time" ... relative to what other object? Does it matter if you are traveling toward or away from the object? What happens to doplar at the speed of light? If the entire universe were "moving at the speed of light", everything within the universe would look as normal as the bowl of soup in front of you. It is relative. If the speed of light is some kind of absolute, it only approaches the absolute relative to the thing that is not moving at the speed of light, or, more accurately, moving in another direction at the speed of light. So nothing reaches any magical state as it approaches a certain speed unless it is viewed in comparison to the counter-moving object. The high rate of speed makes such comparison extremely difficult because the counter-moving object is instantly so far away. Traveling the speed of light, to the experience of the traveler, is just the same as traveling at any other speed unless there is a collision. In that case, the only difference is how badly smashed your hood, engine and front tires are.
I took your feedback here to Klee. Here's the input he gave.
The notion of relative time invented by Einstein was based on a presumption. They presumed that spacetime has no substructure. Now, if that is true, it would be illogical to say that something is moving relative to space. And one can only conceive of motion relative to some other object in space.
However, many modern approaches to quantum gravity are exploring the idea of taking quantum mechanics so seriously that we seek to quantize space itself into indivisible quanta or chunks of space, fitting together according to a dynamical code, like a 3D mosaic tiling language. With this newer thought in mind, one can now actually have motion relative to this substructure and not only relative to other objects as particle-like patterns propagating in the substructure.
With respect to the notion of “time”, this is a tough thing to discuss in just a few words. But I’ll try.
Einstein conceived of time as an abstract and somewhat enigmatic thing. He was smart about it and had very good reason, which is an experiment that shows that if you accelerate something, it will experience time more slowly. Special relativity has an inverse proportionality between propagation and the experience of time such that if something moves at the speed limit of the universe, its time slows to zero. Salam and Pati conceived of the notion of an electron with substructure. Nowadays, most physicists view an electron as a dimensionless point. And de Broglie conceived of the idea of an electron clock. So imagine for a moment the notion of a universe on a checker board. Let’s call that the substructure of spacetime. Now, let’s say that each time you move your checker around in a circle on a 2x2 set of four squares, it completes one cycle of its clock in this toy model. But what if I gave you 8 moves and allowed you to also move this little particle clock model forward. If you chose to, you could decide not to move it forward at all and to simply rotate it two times on your 2x2 squares to complete two full cycles of the clock. So, in this sense, your particle has experienced the maximum number of clock cycles - the maximum experience of time at the cost of experiencing no propagation forward on the checker board. However, what if you spent some of your 8 moves to propagate the little pattern forward? What would occur? Of course, you would do that at the cost of clock cycles. You would trade in some clock cycles in exchange for moving the particle forward. There would be a sort of inverse proportionality between the particle’s experience of time and its propagation relative to the 8 possible moves. For 8 moves, is there a limit to how far you can move your particle? Yes indeed. This toy model gives you some feel for why the universe would have a speed limit. For some number of frames in this animation, say 8 frames, you cannot move your particle forward any further than 8 squares. That is the speed limit, analogous to the speed of light.
Thank you for that reply. So, by your checkerboard analogy, it would appear that the effects of reduction in "time" would be a function of acceleration, not speed, because speed itself would not require the dedication of modified checker moves to move the checker in space. Once motion is established, in the absence of friction, the motion continues without contribution of resources such as the modified checker move (Newton). If frictionless motion were constant at any speed, where no energy was required to influence motion, the resources to operate the clock would be fully available, and time would not be compressed. The other question is whether the impediment of the operation of a clock actually changes time, or simply makes the clock inaccurate to a universal constant of time. Has any experiment such as Cern allowed the interaction of particles, one of which has been put into a different "time" by speed or acceleration?
It might take me a day to get back to you...I'm the through person...I actually learned something myself, from your question and klee's answer :)
Thank you for engaging my question.
I think, if you get close to lightspeed, the speed of anything (material) else is irrelevant - since it is wayyy slower than you would be :) and you would experience the doppler effect, you would not see light the way you see it at "normal" speeds, everything becomes tunnel-like distorted. Relative to other "objects" you would still not exceed lightspeed - spacetime would bend to ensure, that lightspeed remains absolute ;)
"The Force" from StarWars! i always thought the same thing!
and also with you.
To me, this theory seems very intuitive, as if ive always known the world according to these rules. In trying to describe it to others ive been unable to explain it as clear as Klee. I wonder what the rest of the current theortical physicists think of this languge.
I'm not sure where, but I once stumbled upon conjecture: "Consciousness is a way for the Universe to observe itself"
Probably ir was said by Carl Sagan
I love the Idea, I beleive the crystal replesention could be projected as the shape and dimention of the pyramyd of Gysa. the pyramid has 8 dimentions that looks like 4 and projets as three, also built with the golden ratio as well as when multiplid by the size of its self and using pi it equals to the speed of light. perhaps that is what they were trying to tell as in a amessage through time and space. using the pyramid would be like the past revealing to the present and the present revealing the past. just a thought ! anyhow great work ! keep at it !
GREAT theory.Youre probably exactly correct.I hope Klee Irwin reads your comment.
This stuff is mind-blowing. Extremely interesting.
Agreed!
@Greg Jacques Lucifer's Jizz Gargler - so says the expert ;)
In no way understood a lot of it, but I absolutely what they are researching and love this channel. I will show this to my students. Who are coders :)
I hate string theory and I love this. No one is ever going to prove string theory but this, I have hope!
On the idea that "100% of the matter in the universe can organize into a consciousness", by Irwin's example, biology can only organize into consciousness when it is fed with additional biological resources. So, for instance, outer space and places where chemical and material resources are limited in certain ways, those areas cannot organize into biological resources and therefore cannot organize into consciousness in the way of biology as we know it. If it is possible for consciousness to organize in 100% of the universe as Irwin suggests, then there would almost certainly have to be a form of consciousness that is not biological, and if that is the case, chances are the universe has already organized into that consciousness, or was conscious in that way from the beginning, if there was a beginning. This would explain why quantum synchronicity happens now, and not just in theory in the future after biology might invade and "consciousify" the rest of the universe. So, mankind will not necessarily evolve until his consciousness biologically consumes or permeates every last atom in the universe. It is egocentric to think that our consciousness is destined to swallow the universe or that our biology can project into every possible hostile nano-milimeter in the universe. It is far more plausible that what we see as our consciousness, which is obviously extremely limited, is simply a small fragment of universal consciousness that our particular bodies happen to borrow in a particular way from the greater consciousness of the universe. Just as our eyes only see a small slice of photonic spectrum, our particular consciousness may have been selected from a much larger field that is mostly inaccessible to our biology. Just as we feel we can see everything when we cannot, we feel we are capable of total consciousness, but we may be utterly incapable of full-spectrum consciousness in our biological character. This puts us in a much more realistic perspective as simply another inhabitant of the universe, not the egotistically imagined "central driving dynamic of the universe's destined evolution". Like toads or asteroids, humans are just borrowers and carriers of a tiny selection of the universe's vast physical, energetic and conscious mass and variety. Our destiny is not to bring our consciousness to the universe, it is to expand our own consciousness to explore that pre-existing and wider conscious realm, just as we may use our legs to explore spaces beyond where we may be standing. This is explored in some studies of the pineal gland. Being the most intelligent species is no more special than being the fastest-running or the hairiest.
Again, got feedback from Klee on this:
When you say “biology”, you may be speaking of things made of DNA, carbon, etc. However, those things are made of the same fundamental electrons and quarks as things that you would say are not biological. And perhaps those two things are made of one fundamental thing - a quantum of space. For us, these are the tetrahedra that we project mathematically from the 8D lattice called E8.
So here, if we do away with a hard line in the sand between biological and non-biological, we can focus on self-organization of the pattern.
I’m not saying there is not something deep and special about biology. In fact, this is the most sophisticated form of self-organization of energy that we know of in the universe. And it is the only place where most scientists and lay people can agree that consciousness has emerged.
With respect to your thought about what came first, the chicken or the egg; consider observing how you think in linear time. This is natural and normal for us human animals. But mathematically, there is no serious logical problem with the notion that A caused B, which caused C, which caused A. Certain interpretations of quantum mechanics (David Bohm) and certain experiments (retrocausal quantum eraser double slit experiment), allow one to talk without complete craziness about retrocausal feedback loops. Furthermore, in the early 2010s, a team in Israel showed how two particles can be quantum entangled over time. This is very weird because it means that if you change the spin of one such particle back here in 2017, you instantly change the spin of its quantum entangled mate back in 1999 or in 2025 or wherever in time it is separated. Now, by the axiom that whatever is possible physically happens, given enough time, all energy in the universe may have self-organized into a network of conscious systems, where the whole system is conscious.
I consist of about 180 pounds of energy that self-organized (some energy expressed as mass) into Klee-ness - something that sort of seems conscious and possesses freewill. It’s hard to define consciousness in a manner we can agree on. But at least most scientists agree consciousness exists. In any event, there is certainly no principle in physics that places an upper bound on the percentage of the universe that can self-organize into consciousness, the way I did and you did. And it is entirely unclear within the current state of physics re: what the extent of quantum entanglement in the universe is and how much more it can self-organize into a quantum neural network of entanglement. Retrocausality appears to be a rigorous and plausible view, although, without a final quantum gravity theory, there will be plenty of opportunity for argument.
But let’s just be hypothetical for a moment. Let’s say that
(1) the universe can live long enough that the inevitable self-organization of all energy into consciousness occurs. (2) let us pretend that retrocausal feedback loops and the universe as a sort of quantum neural net is physically plausible.
If these two things were true, then what is the most logical conjecture one can make about what the substrate is for the origin of this geometric code (ones like what we work with)? It might be the future states where the universe becomes virtually or literally 100% self-organized quanta of space/energy into consciousness. That is, such a vast mind-like object could hold within itself, abstractly, the abstract elements of the code from which it self-actualized itself via evolutionary emergence. The beginning would be the mother of the end-point and the end-point would be the mother of the beginning.
As fantastical as this idea seems, it has two qualities:
First, it is logically consistent in every way.
And, second, it is fully explanatory with no remaining unanswered questions or aggressive axioms/assumptions.
For more detail on this, see: www.researchgate.net/publication/315845059_The_Code_Theoretic_Axiom_the_Third_Ontology
Im wondering if you are consciously or if this is a just by chance, making references ou drawing on the ideas of Terrence Mckenna? As doubtful and exotic his methods of inquiry may have been, he was, even though in a less scientific fashion, getting to conclusions very near to those your propose about reality. In particular, he was speaking of a
waiting for predictions
Wow! I know this is too much skepticism and pardon me for asking this but based on your explanation can the
"2 D CROP CIRCLE QUASI STRICTURES" be an advanced geometric message from a higher dimension? Can that be possible?
At least someone explores new ways of thinking to explain our reality. String Theory with its 11 dimensions appears to be just a construct to fulfill a mathematical requirement but fails to explain reality
The focus is on the observer and the observed not the observation itself. I have a few questions concerning this. Quantum entanglement? What if there is no actual entanglement? What if there is one particle and it's reflection? We can look at the positive and negative charged particles. It would make sense to me that the 2 entangled particles are one and the same. The mirror effect. As I view reality I see how all that is created is determined by specific frequencies and vibrations. Our minds work as translators of these frequencies. So what creates frequency and vibration? The observer. The observer emits sound. This creates waves. Particles are in continuous motion. Particles vibrate to music that surrounds them. The unobservable force. It's unobservable because it's observation in itself. I see the connection with the double slit experiment, the phantom effect caused by DNA and the big bang itself. So to observe the observer emits sound creating the wave pattern of the particle. The phantom effect would be the sound emitted by the DNA when put in the vacuum with particles and this sound remains in the vacuum holding the particles in place. This for me leads to dark energy. The fabric of existence. The other creative force. The unobservable force. Observation. As sound creates all into existence through observation. My view of the big bang..so if there was a spherical structure possibly a crystal and let's say a sound was emitted within this crystal sphere. All these sound waves would come crashing into a single point creating a friction that would spring forth a light particle. As the sound continues crashing into itself a huge build up of particles occur that ultimately would explode into existence. All particles would span out and within the grid of sound and light other explosions at each intersection would occur springing forth created forms. The result of this friction would be electricity and electro magnetic forces. As sound weakens so does the created structure. Entropy occurs. I know this is very much in layman's terms. I'm not a physisicts. This is also a very simplified description. I'd appreciate feedback and thoughts. Thank you
So if the first 3 dimensions are coordinates in 3D space, shouldn't we assume the others are also coordinates? If we are all one consciousness then:
1. Height
2. Length
3. Depth
4. Time/Speed - Different speed different time
5. Size/mass (human, atom, galaxy, etc.)
6. Individual Consciousness/ the experiencer/ Ego/ Perception/Dream/Thought/Sleep - (this is where electrons rotate their axis and pop in and out of this reality - from perception/to dream/ to thought)
7. Spirit / Flow/ Tao/ the experience/ the Present Moment - different Tao - different universe
8. Self (Brahma/god/original consciousness) This is also the building block of all matter. It is the information/the energy.
3D object projects a 2D object with light (a shadow). A 4D object (soul)
projects a 3D object (human) with light. Because in the 4D of time/space it is
an extrapolation of who we are over time. Our soul.
:-) This might be the best description of reality i've ever heard. This is mind blowing wonderful stuff. As a psychedelic, this concurs with my intuition about reality, perfectly. It's provided the structure for what i feel. Thank you so much. Amazing stuff!
My girlfirend had this same theory while on LSD !
First of all, great video ! A possibility that is not mentioned is this: What if consciousness is not emerging from ever more organized "physical" structures, (after all, everything is pointing out to the fact that what we call "physical" is really Information)? What if, instead of that, it is all the way around? ie. what we perceive as organized structures is the "projection" or the "result" of ever more organized data structures at an information level, and those growing levels of organization (lower entropy, lower Shannon entropy) is what gives rise to higher consciousness levels? So, maybe it is not that "complex, organized physical things" generate consciousness, but the other way around, higher leves of consciousness, ie. lower levels of Shannon entropy, are perceived at our "physical" level of perception as virus, bacteria, amoeba, fish, cats, dogs, monkeys, primates, dolphins and humans. Just another approach...
(and sorry, maybe I've should have switch the order of the last two: humans and then dolphins ;-)
Just maybe the state of nonexistence is conscious. Many nothingness can emerge and form bigger nothingnesses. Nothingnesses don’t need a reason or proof to exist.
Fascinating and inspiring. Can't wait to see where the research leads.
Consciousness does NOT exist in the universe.
The universe exists IN consiousness!
Yes, exactly that! 👏👏👏👏
Here is an exert from Margaret Storms book called "The Return of the Dove" where she talks of our needing to repair the tattered patterns back into triangles in order to evolve.
The etheric body contains all records, all memories of past lives, back to the very beginning of our individualization as White Fire Beings. The etheric body is what modern scientists call the subconscious, which is perhaps as good a name as any other providing its meaning is clearly understood. At the present time the term is used glibly and in a meaningless manner. That situation will have to be changed because a person with a clogged etheric body can make little evolutionary progress. He must understand clearly that the etheric records of bad habits must be transmuted so that the tiny etheric filaments are clean and firmly woven in a perfect pattern of triangles. Wherever the etheric body registers disease or disharmony of any kind the tiny filaments become disarranged and tattered. These records of disharmony remain until transmuted. Meanwhile they are built in, embodiment after embodiment.
A striking example of the horrible after-effects of war memories retained by the etheric body, is now being illustrated on a world-wide scale. It seemed very noble back in 1940 to train young men to march forth and kill the enemy. Now the bewildered public wonders why we have so much juvenile delinquency. The answer is that many boys who were killed in World War II are back in embodiment, with their etheric memories of violence freshly imprinted on their subtle bodies. The sight of a gun, of a blood-and-thunder TV show or movie, membership in a street gang, or even a family argument is sufficient to stir these etheric records into violent upheavals. Yet the public remains captive to churchianity, militarism and death, resolutely refusing to even investigate the glorious possibilities of living in a clean and wholesome world.
Freewill is a canard. Freewill isn't a requirement of consciousness.
Reality, (or as I like to put my tweak on it), Free will is an illusion, albeit a persistent one. imo :)
@@Jaded-Wanderer Why? I'm neither running for office nor selling you an enlightenment service. Let those types use the reason you've already shelved.
I contest free will, to me it is more like free choice, as presented to you by life. If I had free will, I would not have to be restricted by law or morality. Free choice, makes you responsible for every action, it is very grounding.....free will puts you into a more ethereal thinking.
You're very goode at explaining things !!!!
Consciousness defines, not creates, reality. Thus, it defines what is real. Reality changes as consciousness develops.
Reality is both random and deterministic. A timeline is a purely spacetime Newtonian path that complies with causality and it is thus deterministic. Yet, different Newtonian timelines can criss-cross and one can pick up a different timeline according to the level of consciousness. The intersecting points may appear, at first glance, random but the decision when to shift timelines is defined outside spacetime and, again, has to do with the level of consciousness one is at.
I suspect that the use of language is totally deterministic, causal, but free will is outside spacetime and depends on the consciousness level or focus one is at.
It can be said that consciousness is like a field, unbounded and continuous i.e., it must spread throughout time and space. Therefore, everything is conscious, from the simplest structure to the most complex e.g., from a quark to a galaxy and beyond. Yet, conscious does not necessarily mean self-conscious. One can simply say conscious means being aware (again, not necessarily being self-aware). Consciousness implies perception and reaction, both according to a pre-programmed "code". The level of sensing and reaction can be expressed, mechanically in degrees of freedom, which is equivalent to degrees of consciousness. A mineral can "sense" a change in properties and react (mechanically, chemically). A photon can sense a change and react, and so on. Increasing degrees of freedom means becoming more aware of the surroundings and of itself and it is equivalent to accessing a more complex pre-programed code until one starts to become more self-aware and free-will begins to develop. Seth talks about consciousness units, which may be analogous not only to quanta but also to degrees of consciousness.
Consciousness does not spring from the laws of physics or from any theory; consciousness creates theories.
Discover = Dis + Cover = remove the cover. Knowledge is analogous to consciousness, a field unbounded and continuous. All what scientists and inventors do is to dis-cover what's already everywhere
As shown in a paper, we teleport all the time without being aware and without technologies.
If space and time were collapsed, everything and all would be packed together; there is no distance. Time and space represent a way that energy is coded so if space were secondary, it means that is also primary, which means space is a translation. Our minds interpret part of energy as space, thus space can also be translated in another form.
Mind blown ... thank you!
Glad you liked it! Thank you for watching!
Really excellent job of explaining a lot of deep concepts that I still don't fully grasp, but maybe understand a little bit better now :)