Atomic Orbitals Simply Explained! Inorganic CHEM - 1.12

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лют 2024
  • This video simply explains atomic orbitals. Please note that the information in this video may not always be accurate or up-to-date due to new discoveries. There may also be overlooked mistakes. Therefore, only use this video as an additional resource to enhance your understanding.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @InorganicChemistryTutor
    @InorganicChemistryTutor  2 місяці тому +7

    Minor Corrections:
    1. In this context, the correct spelling should be "principal" instead of "principle."
    2. To clarify my previous statement about finding electrons "outside" the orbitals being highly unlikely: Orbitals are essentially infinite in size, potentially extending throughout the universe. The representations in the video illustrate roughly 90-95% of their probability distribution, indicating where electrons are most likely to be found.

  • @itzmeB2
    @itzmeB2 2 місяці тому +1

    Underrated channel ngl, has the really high production quality

  • @Brunowerther
    @Brunowerther 21 день тому

    keep it up sir, you explain it really well

  • @nichtrichtigrum
    @nichtrichtigrum 2 місяці тому +1

    I like your video as you explain orbitals in an easy to follow way :) I have a small correction, though: At 0:37 you say that finding electrons "outside" the orbitals is highly unlikely but not impossible. However, technically, all orbitals stretch out infinitely through the whole universe (with the exception of the so-called knots in the wave-function). The orbital shapes that are depicted, usually only show where the electrons are with 90% or 95% (not sure) probability.

    • @InorganicChemistryTutor
      @InorganicChemistryTutor  2 місяці тому +2

      Yes you are correct! However, it can be counterintuitive to describe orbitals as vast as the universe while portraying them as seemly distinct, limited spaces. My aim was to simplify the explanation, by being more black and white. Explaining orbitals involves balancing accuracy with simplicity, as oversimplification can lead to inaccuracies (shown by your comment).Therefore, the correction you’ve provided is definitely important and I’ll add it to my pin comment!

  • @LegendGaming-il4iw
    @LegendGaming-il4iw 2 місяці тому +1

    I don't know why , but I liked this video after watching 30sec of it

  • @Boooommerang
    @Boooommerang 2 місяці тому

    Thank you

  • @Simon-fg8iz
    @Simon-fg8iz 2 місяці тому +1

    Principal, not principle (1:08). Nuclear, not nucular.
    Otherwise a valuable short resource for students to deepen their understanding.

  • @lakshhonline
    @lakshhonline Місяць тому

    THANKS MY JEE EXAM IS ON 6 VERY HELPFUL VIDEO

  • @davidmitchell0722
    @davidmitchell0722 15 днів тому

    The "nuculus"?

  • @cbarnes2160
    @cbarnes2160 2 місяці тому

    It's cool to delineate the menagerie of orbital types. But if you want to actually explain orbitals, you need to go through *why* they have those crazy shapes. It's not obvious how angular momentum leads to interlocking dumbbells, for example.
    Or at least link to a video that talks about that...