11:00 I'd love a deep dive! Feel free to bring other Muslims with other views and you'll have a panel on Islamic causality like the ones Dr. Khalil Andani makes
10:37 Interesting. But perhaps this backfires. The Kalam Cosmological argument relies on causation to infer that the universe had a beginning. And that it was God who caused such a universe to exist. However, if causality is known via induction, it's much harder to believe in a beginning of a universe. I would say that causality is a priori, as Hamza Tzortzis has argued in his book The Divine Reality
The Kalam cosmological argument is a Western interpretation of the Islamic argument known as Burhan al-Huduth al-Ajsam. I may create a video in the future to explore the differences and demonstrate how the traditional Islamic argument is both more coherent and certain. Furthermore, this position does not negate causation; rather, it affirms causation as the sole rational possibility. However, it rejects the notion that correlations observed in the natural world represent actual causal relationships, asserting instead that Allah alone is the true cause.
This is such an amazing video. I loved your explanation. Do you think it's acceptable to not believe in occasionalism and still be a Sunni? I think Ibn Taymiyyah believed in secondary causation
JazakAllahu Khayran, my dear. The issue is that rejecting occasionalism, in its various forms, constitutes both a denial of the ijmāʿ of the Salaf and a rejection of clear Quranic verses. Moreover, it carries significant theological implications, reducing Allah to a deity with a deistic-like relationship with the world, an idea wholly incompatible with the essence of Islamic theology.
Depends on what you mean, if you mean that He assigns purposes to creations, then yes He does. If you however mean, that He acts because of these purposes, then no, nothing causes Him to act.
Nothing compels Him to do anything, this however does not mean that His actions have no wisdom. As He Himself says, “And We did not create the heaven and earth and that between them in play.” [Quran 21:16]
پیارے بھائی سلامت رہیں بہترین کام کرتے رہیں جس ادمی کا نام اپ نے نہیں لیا جب یہ ویڈیو اس تک پہنچے گی تو وہ اور اس کے شاگرد اپ کے پیچھے پڑ جائینگے تیار رہیں اللہ اپ کی حفاظت فرمائے اور اعلی اخلاقی معیار قائم رکھیں تبارک اللہ جزاک اللہ
11:00 I'd love a deep dive! Feel free to bring other Muslims with other views and you'll have a panel on Islamic causality like the ones Dr. Khalil Andani makes
ٱلــــسَّـلَامُ عَلَــــيْـكُـمْ وَرَحْـــمَـةُ ٱلــلَّٰـهِ وَبَـــرَكَــاتُهُ
.Abdullah here! Good to see you akhi
JazakhAllah Khayr dear
Waiyyakum
Glad seeing you!
JazakhAllah Khayr brother
10:37 Interesting. But perhaps this backfires. The Kalam Cosmological argument relies on causation to infer that the universe had a beginning. And that it was God who caused such a universe to exist. However, if causality is known via induction, it's much harder to believe in a beginning of a universe. I would say that causality is a priori, as Hamza Tzortzis has argued in his book The Divine Reality
The Kalam cosmological argument is a Western interpretation of the Islamic argument known as Burhan al-Huduth al-Ajsam. I may create a video in the future to explore the differences and demonstrate how the traditional Islamic argument is both more coherent and certain. Furthermore, this position does not negate causation; rather, it affirms causation as the sole rational possibility. However, it rejects the notion that correlations observed in the natural world represent actual causal relationships, asserting instead that Allah alone is the true cause.
This is such an amazing video. I loved your explanation. Do you think it's acceptable to not believe in occasionalism and still be a Sunni? I think Ibn Taymiyyah believed in secondary causation
JazakAllahu Khayran, my dear. The issue is that rejecting occasionalism, in its various forms, constitutes both a denial of the ijmāʿ of the Salaf and a rejection of clear Quranic verses. Moreover, it carries significant theological implications, reducing Allah to a deity with a deistic-like relationship with the world, an idea wholly incompatible with the essence of Islamic theology.
Look who's back
MashaAllah ❤
Coming from X. Keep pushing
JazakhAllah Khayr brother
Super Based
How did Muslims and Western civilization differ in Aristotlism? Can you make a video of it?
Hmm, that’s a very good topic, In Sha Allah if enough interest is shown on these matters, I’ll make a video.
Does Allah act with purpose? I know he acts wih no need but does he have purposes?
Depends on what you mean, if you mean that He assigns purposes to creations, then yes He does.
If you however mean, that He acts because of these purposes, then no, nothing causes Him to act.
@@TheGhazaalian so he doesn't do an action to achieve any end result correct?
Nothing compels Him to do anything, this however does not mean that His actions have no wisdom.
As He Himself says,
“And We did not create the heaven and earth and that between them in play.”
[Quran 21:16]
@@TheGhazaalian okay
Is there a secondary cause?
No.
So there is no space for human free will?
What does free will have to do with secondary causation ?
If all causes are by Allah swt where is the free will?
@@huzaif5183 free will is related to will (Iradah), not cause which relates to Power (Qudrah)
پیارے بھائی سلامت رہیں بہترین کام کرتے رہیں جس ادمی کا نام اپ نے نہیں لیا جب یہ ویڈیو اس تک پہنچے گی تو وہ اور اس کے شاگرد اپ کے پیچھے پڑ جائینگے تیار رہیں اللہ اپ کی حفاظت فرمائے اور اعلی اخلاقی معیار قائم رکھیں تبارک اللہ جزاک اللہ
Ameen, and may Allah do the same for you, Ameen.
JazakhAllah Khayr my brother, may Allah reward you for your kind words, Ameen.
برادر محترم اواز بہت کم ہے اچھے مائک کا استعمال کریں شکریہ
JazakhAllah Khayr for the feedback, will improve it in the next video.
Super Based