Let's Make Fun of JK Rowling for 32 More Minutes
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 сер 2024
- "Harry Potter is a book about children in the 90's that never got to hear the Spice Girls. There's also magic, but that's way less intreresting." - Killian Experience
Patreon - bit.ly/39XbKga
Ko-Fi - bit.ly/3fw7BB0
Tumblr - bit.ly/3gvBR0m
Got Something For Us? Send it to lilypeetsubmissions@gmail.com
00:00 - Introduction
00:14 - Harold Twatter
01:38 - Girlboss Movie Hermione
07:39 - Ron Is A Dick
13:58 - Simp Man
24:18 - Rowling Hates Women
31:36 - Conclusion
#harrypotter #jkrowling #potterheads - Розваги
Pointing out that detail of Snape checking to see if Harry was dead in movie 4 only to relax when he saw it was Cedric made me laugh WAY harder than it probably should've
“OH NO HARRY- oh wait it’s just a hufflepuff.”
My bf laughed at that
666th like
Sorry this happens like once every three years for me lol
There's also the fact that the words "bossy", "naggy" and "busybody" are practically synonymous in this context. So really Hermione has one flaw: being constantly confrontational.
and God forbid a woman sand up for herself
@@erika-paigehutch3930 Indeed, heaven forbid a woman not tolerate abuse upon herself or others not deserving of it-
Especially when pretty much all of the times she confronts them they are doing or are about to do something insanely reckless, dangerous, or just plain old cheating
My biggest issue with Snape is that he is an incredibly vile person. He calls his best friend a racial slur when she pushes him away for being a death eater. Then he tells her that she is the exception. He also threatened to kill Nevilles pet and punishes him for not letting that happen. He bullies Neville to the point where a child, one who's parents were tortured into insanity by death eaters, sees Snape as the thing he fears most. Not his family dead (like Mrs weasley), not the death eaters, not voldy or dementors or any of the many terrifying things he has seen. Nope. It's his teacher that he fears the most.
It's funny that when Harry Potter came out, the Conservatives were quick to label it Satanic because of witchcraft, and now those same people support JK.
@@aimeejo3405 Lies and revisionist history.
Well, DUH it's a book(/movie), ABOUT WIZARDS-
@@RichterTheRat what was the prominent conservative group that called it satanic?
Lol no
My own parents told me not to read it as a child because it would "lead me to devil worship". They could've just pointed out it's shitty writing and I would've put it down! 😄
If you get an ad for Hogwarts Legacy on this video please tell me the URL in the bottom left hand corner. I can block ads on a URL basis.
Thanks for the heads up.
I did not know that was a thing, blocking certain URL's, neat! Though I've got YT Premium so we chill
Also, there’s this thing about Hermione and almost every single woman/girl in Chamber of Secrets is infatuated by Lockhart and keep making excuses for his clear and utter incompetence as a teacher, with Harry and Ron being the only ones who openly criticize him and Hermione being upset when they do.
In most cases Hermione is able to see through BS and uses facts and logic to poke holes in stories and theories that don’t make sense, generally being called insensitive, rude, mean or boring when she does. But with Lockhart she somehow doesn’t? Because Hermione is suddenly superficial and obsessed with looks and keeps making excuses for him when he can’t do anything right.
Also, I remember that when we are introduced to Fleur De La Cour, Hermione is immediately antagonistic and jealous when the boys say they think she’s pretty and tries to say anything to bring her down in their eyes. And when Bill later gets engaged with Fleur- Mrs Weasley, Ginny and Hermione are still acting antagonistic towards her, with Mrs Weasley going so far as to say they are moving too fast while making excuses for getting married to her husband very quickly by saying that “it was meant to be”.
And the real only reason we’re given for why the girls don’t like Fleur is because she’s rude and snobbish, but given how Rowling writes women I generally believe that this how she believes beautiful women act. Stuck-up, snobbish and rude creatures who think the world of themselves and need to be humbled (by a man btw). And that also makes it okay for every other woman to not like them and act like they have hurt them personally somehow.
So, Rowling hates women for being too pretty and she also hates women for being too ugly. Just can't do right by her.
@@auditect950 Yeah, the more I look at how she writes women and girls a lot just comes across as internalized misogyny which feels very uncomfortable.
A while ago I thought it was kinda neat how Hermione is the most competent person out of the main characters (including Harry) but now it just comes across as Hermione taking it upon herself to look after the boys so they don’t kill themselves or get expelled.
Also, how so many girls are written emotional and being given very little support or understanding from the people around them. Like Cho being upset after Cedric being killed and being an emotional mess. It could have a set up for sort of relationship or even just friendship between her and Harry as he maybe comforts her, helps her and all that and over the story they grow closer and she’s able to let go of Cedric. But instead Harry just looks like a sick but Rowling just writes as her being too emotional and needing to get over it already.
So, to sum up, women are emotional, superficial, nagging, bossy, boring and rule abiding (read: not letting boys have any fun), jealous and just need to settle down and have a family already because that what they’re role in life is. And depending on whether they are ugly or beautiful, they’re likely going to be horrible people who need to be taught a lesson.
… yeah
I think that there's is a lack of general understanding permiating through the Gryffindor Trios friendship where, despite being friends for years they still showcase that they misunderstand each other even when it's completely nonsensical.
A better version of Philosopher's Stone would be about these three kids who come from very different backgrounds to learn to cooperate and understand each other which would then serve as a base for their future friendship. With disagreements only coming because of circumstantial plot stuff and always noticing when one of them is going through stuff from then on.
I still don't like the fact that Harry and Ron never seem to realize that Hermione could face being excluded from the wizarding world entirely if she were to screw up solely because of her background.
That would mean an actual understanding of your characters with empathy and depth and we can't have that!
The one thing that absolutely enrages me about the stuff that JK has said post-harry potter is saying that lycanthropy is a metaphor for HIV/AIDS. A note about Potterheads is that they headcanon the only werewolf character we know as gay, like wtf
It's even worse: Potterheads claim Jojo's claim about lycnthropy being akin to AIDS makes him "gay coded" and argued his relation with Tonks was a hetcon
Fuck I hate Potterheads so much
Pause
and that werewolf guy who was aligned with voldemort and made that creepy comment about liking kids
The only Hermione flaw which isnt on the list, and which is still a sexist trope but not quite as intensely, is how much she follows the rules. And wait a minute, that's the flaw they gave her in the movies!
In one of the video games, Hermione literally has nagging as an ability. (It provides buffs.)
Which game? I'm now oddly curious.
I think it was the GBA game for the Prisoner of Azkaban@@Prince__Teclis
11:15 I only just noticed "alan rickmans alan rickmanly" and I was rolling on the damn floor.
oh dear, that part about snape and teachers being bullies... hits too close to home. my dad was horribly abused by a teacher and still holds it. i went to the same school as my parents did and during an end of the year ceremony he didnt clap when that bully walked on stage (shes still there but mostly as an authority figure and not a teacher for better and for worse). thats a tiny example, but its fucking deep in there and he never talks about any of this, the only time i got info about the details of the abuse (i wont share for privacy but you can imagine) was from my mom as they were in the same class. ive interacted with the bully a few times and i see her as a monster. it probably goes both ways as i have my dads last name and the same facial features, i have no doubt she sees him in me and im just glad i never had any real classes with her
going back to snape, to see what is otherwise meant to be a morally good character do something like that... no. it makes me shiver from fear and anger. no child or adult or anyone deserves to be treated like that and acting like its just normal is so, so wrong. while i dont know that much about harry potter as i wasnt ever that into it, i did absorb it via osmosis and those little bits and pieces i picked up about snape have always been so cruel to me, especially now that im older and understand it more. all of this is just more proof that rowling LOOOOVES to keep things exactly the same, but that one example in particular is just too much for me. anyways fuck bullies
my friends and i recently watched the last two harry potter movies because my friend was binging them and we were all like "yeah we're down for that" but when Snape died and it acted like it was supposed to be sad we all screamed at the screen about what a horrible awful person he was. Cannot imagine seeing this man, who fucking bullied CHILDREN as a victim
When I think of all of Joke Rolling’s issues with women and people of color, I can’t help but always think back to Angelina Johnson, the black girl who was captain of Harry’s quidditch team. Not only was she treated also like a nag that annoyed her team, but that her *being* a nag was her compensating for not being as good of a captain as the boy that came before her.
And she gets ACTUAL racial insults thrown at her. Draco and his cronies actively say, and I quote, that “her hair looks like worms”. And while Harry is angry about it, it isn’t ever actually directed in defense of Angelina, but focused on his own generalized hatred of Draco. And as someone who didn’t look at the books until they were older, that was a big 🚩🚩🚩🚩immediately
Literally had to go check looking for it, and HOLY SHIT! That's fucking gross
Jesus fucking Christ.
The fact that it wasn’t ever addressed with Angelina or Harry or literally anyone introducing Draco’s face to their bare knuckles (or comforting Angelina; literally anything other than just dropping it) makes this feel so much worse than it already is. It makes me think that Jo Jo’s Bizarre Transphobia thought of it as bad enough to give to the schoolyard bully obsessed with blood/racial purity, but not bad enough for it to ever be fully responded to and addressed.
Joanne is just the worst type of person.
I remember reading all the books and I feel bad that I never noticed that. You'd think something that blatantly s3xist and r@scist would stand out to a black girl, but no. Just completely over my head. I realized the house elf thing but at the time i just thought "rowling probably didn't realize what she wrote about". Which I also now kick myself about.
Harry Potter used to be my favorite book series, am I just oblivious?
@@untitled-gv3qp In my experience, those books are so long winded you probably skimmed over it.
This reminds me of HP Love Craft, and how the “horror” in his stories was just him being afraid of everyone who is not a rich white male.
I did giggle when I found out one of his stories was based of learning his grandmother was Welsh.
i really love the point at 21:05. as a kid it's so easy to buy all the crappy excuses for child abuse that get thrown around. but they lose their power when u become an adult and realize that the idea of systematically hurting and manipulating a child is JUST FUCKING BONKERS. being a 12yo and pain being your norm, you just dont know any different ... vs being a grown ass adult and LOOKING at a 12yo and seeing how absolutely little and half-grown and vulnerable they are. the older i get, the less my parents' cruelty makes sense.
It gave me an ad for Hogwarts legacy ☠️
Did you get the Ad URL? I can block that
@@LilianOrchard Oh snap, I'll try to get the link, but, I haven't gotten those ads lately :')
@@LilianOrchard I didn't, sorry. I would have gotten it but I got another ad and it disappeared.
💀
Me too😂
It's a shame that a lot of people see Snape's character as Incel when as you showed he is quite literally the opposite in terms of his behavior towards Lily, honestly that probably says a lot about actual Incels who *think* they behave like Snape in wanting what's best for their obsession but in reality would rather see them dead than not owned by them.
@@tainasiman2107 It's as Lily said in the video towards the halfway mark of Snape's section
@@artysaurus6969I would argue that Snape is not an incel in a different way than Lily would (e.g. his undying devotion to protect his love interest as opposed to the scorched earth tactic of “if I can’t have you, nobody can).
My argument is that his celibacy is voluntary. He chooses not to be in any relationship BECAUSE he chooses Lily (in much the same way that Catholic Monks choose God as opposed to the flesh). If he wanted a wife, Voldemort would have provided him a “worthy partner” - assuming that no other Slytherin woman wanted him.
Another female character that was bound to be wife and mother is Nymphadora Tonks. She's such interesting idea of character, being metamorph! Come on, when I watched movies and saw her first time I wanted to learn more about her. And then she's just Lupin's wife. Some book fans told me that there is story about her. This story is about her love for old, depressed and kinda pathetic guy who wants to leave her because of his problems. Which causes Nymphadora being depressed too. Oh, of course she's mother and have a baby! Then she dies. The end) I hate the potential she had, honestly.
(Also, sorry for mistakes)
This is spot on! I remembered reading someone's Facebook post talking about how rewatching the movies made them realized that Snape, for some reason, had always loved and cared for Harry DESPITE that he is shown BLATANTLY making his life and other children that’s NOT in the Slytherin house a living hell! Followed by others commenting how they agreed to this with crying and heart emails next to their comments( Big Yikes). When I opposed this and providing evidence that says otherwise, they just brushed it off and saying they disagree. Like its ok to like an antagonist or villain if their interesting but the defense or justification of clear abuse and inhumane actions is scary to me.
Also Jane Elliot is right on the nose and the funny thing is the Birth Dearth suspiciously is nowhere to be found online or if it was, it cost an arm and leg to get the last I remembered.
A woman wanting so badly to just be a housewife and instead of doing that; writing stories which villify women in any other position and screeching about it on twitter years after she finonshed the only book series she wrote which anyone cared about, is just pathetic.
And this is after going through an abusive relationship...
I think one reason why snape is rotting so badly in and out the fandom unlike other characters that did terrible things is that he never really gets shit for his treatment of children.
Take sirius for example, he does something that is ( because of the even larger power difference) Worse than abusing students, sirius abuses his slave yet inside the narrative thats the main reason he gets murdered, the text explicitly punishes him for it so maybe ot makes it easier for the reader to overlook it or at least not be as uncomfortable with him.
With snape, he never improves nor he repents for this specific thing, hell, none of the teachers seem to even dislike him~ for it, no wonder he was never even coerced into changing his awful behavior, because no adult said shit abt it (all the complains were about him being a DE, not a douchebag). He redeems himself only in parts, he dies not as a good or kinder person, while still being very heroic and thats not very satisfactory for most readers, I suppouse.
The whole thing about JK Rowling hating even cis women and only surrounding herself with people just like her rang true to me until I remembered that she wrote it so Voldemort couldn't feel love cause of being conceived under the effects of the love potion. But Rowling herself and her own daughter were products of overall loveless relantionships/abusive situations so like. And that coupled with that thing you said about her probably handwaving her own personal abusive teacher trauma just comes across as her view of the world being a mix of her always making herself the victim while simultaneously believing that other people's trauma isn't a big ideal...
Yeah that's a very long way to say she's stupidly self centered I know.
Thanks for the summary, I was lost.
It’s a really ironic thing of hers to hate trans woman for “not being real woman” but then hating bio woman too. it would be funny if it wasn’t so pathetic.
When I was a kid I loved Ron, but looking back now I think that was a combination of not reading the last couple of books, misremembering the first ones, and ignoring his actual character traits in order to see him as a loyal, funny, down to earth kid who butted heads with Hermione but respected and cared about her for who she was. I think I loved the character I remembered rather than the one I read about.
Wait... You mean that was her writing a romance?! No wonder I never understood why Ron and Hermione got together.
I think some of Rowling's disturbing views on child abuse can be seen when examining Dudley Dursley.
Harry and Dudley don't like each other, because Vernon and Petunia spoil Dudley and bully Harry, encouraging their son to do the same, and the narrative does correctly portray this as bad. However, when someone who Rowling does want to portray as likable shows up, their response is usually to turn the tables, being nice to Harry and cruel to Dudley, and it's framed as Dudley deserving it.
When Hagrid shows up, he physically disfigures Dudley, who is at the time an eleven year old child. A mean one, yes, but still a child who can't do anything to defend himself against a literal half-giant who can use magic. Maybe the pig's tail would have been more acceptable had it just been there for a second to scare him, and then poofed into nothingness, but it was permanent and it was even said that they had to surgically remove it.
In one of the later books, Fred and George hide a jynxed candy for him to find, once again using magic to disfigure someone who can't do anything to retaliate.
In both of these cases, it's framed as Dudley, who I remind you is literally a child in both of these instances, deserving it, not because of his meanness, but because of his weight.
You can tell who is good and bad by which child they like and which one they abuse, not the fact they are abusing a child in the first place. I don't remember a single Harry Potter character actually wanting for Harry and Dudley to get along.
It is even worse than that, Hagrid wanted to turn Dudley COMPLETLY into a pig.
@@poppie267 Goodness, I forgot about that! That people call out child abuse from Snape and the Dursleys but not Hagrid is truly some protagonist-centred morality. He isn't even a relative, teacher or other sort of Guardian figure for Dudley and he really has no business doing these things to him.
But they do that to him because he is a "bullying git". Not because he is fat
@@havewissmart9602 I didn't claim that they did it because of that.
@@auditect950 but you said " In both of these cases, Dudley is framed as deserving it, because of his weight"
Videos like these are some of my favorites because I love being schooled about subjects that I had/have a vague idea about but could never really figure out how to put into words. It either helps me have a more concrete idea about something I was starting to pick up on and didn't quite understand before or just teaches me entirely new things. It kind of reminds me of the Diversity Issues in Counseling class I took as part of my Master's Program because it just gives me the opportunity to sit with and think about some of the uncomfortable, but necessary-to-understand realities of the world.
You know that Jane Elliot quote was oddly uplifting, it’s a reminder how damage to one part of the system is damaging the whole. The monster is big but it’s weak points are multiple
Hey lily as a Pakistani ex Muslim I’d just like to let you know that our community would prefer it if instead of islamaphobia that you would use anti-Muslim bigotry or another similar term instead as the term islamaphobia is commonly used to denounce the experience of ex Muslims by both extremist Muslims and non Muslims
Thank you
Will do
You know it sickens me when people complain about a "girlboss" character cus the argument is so boring take princess peach from the new mario movie the creator of mario myiamoto himself said she never saw herself as "protected" and she was never ment to be he played it off as a joke and yet people complain she's not begging for mario to come save her helpless ass No she pulls up her "dress" as it where gets off her ass a protects her kingdom forget her as a princess she is a queen and people act like its a bad thing?
Personally I felt like she was too OP and it didn't ever feel like she was in danger. And while making her more independent from Mario certainly was a good thing, I am led to question why she ever saw any use in him in the first place. With how strong she was, she really deserved to be the main character instead of Mario's support.
Which is why I only use the term boss. Girl boss is so silly.
Okay, I know this is late buuuuut I had to share this little bit of info on JKRolling. I watched like 3 minutes of a documentary on her life and low and behold! Her hatred for women and cliche writing got explained instantly. Why in the first 3 Minutes? Because her parents were expecting to have a boy and were disappointed (jesus christ) when they got a girl instead. So they raised her as a boy. And with all the stereotypes attached to that I bet!
Kinda sad that she had to go through that, honestly.
I'm only about halfway through, but your points reiterate my thoughts from last time:
A lot of the nostalgia for the franchise doesn't actually come from the books, they come from the movies which do an excellent job of cutting the waffling that infests every corner of JK's writing and they go out of their way to sand down the edges of her *mean spirited* descriptions and events. When I think of the movie adaptations, my feelings are (mostly) positive, though there was little that could be done to salvage the 7th book. But when I actually look in the books? I'm struck by how mean spirited every fucking line is, nevermind the poor writing and pacing.
Some friends and I were talking about the "true to Rowling's vision" TV serial of Harry Potter, and the jokes eventually devolved into "I can't wait for a full episode where Harry and Ron are weirdly racist to a side character for 48 minutes and nothing else happens."
I'm looking forward to the serial, if only because it will put a couple more nails in the coffin of this series by forcing everyone to admit how mean it really is.
Don't watch it. Hatewatching is considered success in the industry
@@LilianOrchard absolutely. Life's too short to mire myself in that obnoxiousness. I just hope its bad writing exposes its ass to all the fans who will watch it.
The whole segment about Hermione abuse makes me think about your various essays about fandom LOOOOOVING to watch women get tortured and a cynical person would say that was the real gripe people had about the changes to the movie. Even with the changes Hermione gets brutalized in ways the boys don’t. Writers who hate women are cut from the same cloth I suppose
That pbs segment was excellent. Thank you for including it. Im gonna go watch the rest of it now.
The most amazing thing is just how influential these relatively unknown books are, look at The Pink Swastika for instance, it presents quite clearly why they believe any encounters with proggies are "NO U are teh nazi!" and how " the gay agenda" is all about convincing "The breeders" to.... Well, *not breed* ultimately as a form of _soft, socially acceptable genocide_ yes really.
Well, relatively unknown _in the Anglo countries_ at least. It sold gangbusters in Uganda, and is credited with influencing their gay bans and homosexual lynchings.
And it's obvious people never bothered reading the second half because it goes into absolutely *bonkers* theory crafting, positing the roots of Nazism goes back to ancient Greco Roman pagan pederasts and their orgies, using *far left Marxist Jean Baptist von Schweitzer* As the linking point to "shadowy gay predatory secret organisations controlling countries"
Forget the is *completely on the opposite side politically* he is a rich gay German in government and they shared interest in the occult, that's all that counts! 😂
It'd all be so funny, if it wasn't promoting such a damaging perspective
The connections he draws pretending there's an unbroken connection in powerful pederasts since 200 bc are literally the conspiracy whiteboard meme.
Another thing about Rowling's hateful ideology:
The only people without magic that we see, aside from Hermione's parents, are all abusive and spiteful to those who have magic.
The Dursleys are the first that we meet, and their defining characteristic is that they're bad people. Mcgonagall, one of the people you're supposed to trust as an authority on the world, said the Dursleys "wouldn't understand him" and that they're the "worst sort of muggles imaginable". The Dursleys aren't characters, they're caricatures, the only one who manages to dip a toe into the kiddy pool of character development being Dudley who learns "oh, hey, maybe being a piece of shit to my family is bad"
Then there's Filch. Filch is the only squib we meet in the series (for anyone not in the know, a squib is a person born to two magical parents but doesn't have any magic). His main character trait is that he is cruel. His most well known quote is him mourning the fact he can't torture children.
Rowling's portrayal of disability and mental illness is far from good, to put it politely.
The reason Filch hates the kids is the same reason the black janitor at the Nathaniel Bedford Forrest school for uber-wealthy, neo-Confederate trust fund babbies hates the students.
I'll do you one better, the good non-magical people are entirely inferred. Hermione's parents are given one sentence in the entire series where it is said that they're in Diagon Alley when Hermione is picking up her books, but there isn't a word of description given of them, to the extent that neither of them even have canonical NAMES before Hermione wipes their memories and changes them.
Nice video. I haven't read Potter books or watched the movie pretty much since the original ran ended so hearing all those lovely ways Rowling is not only a bad person but also incompetent at writing was really interesting to hear. Man, nostalgia blinded us to that decades ago and Rowling just not shutting up made us actually check things back and realize they were worse than we remember :D.
I don't know how old you are, but in most cases, people were just kids, of course, it goes over our heads. We all just remember the stuff we enjoyed.
I must admit, I never really read the books or watched the movies, so my impressions of snape was that he was a bit of a snarky asshole, but goddamn, being cruel to children, especially the child of the woman he loved, what the actual fuck?
I remember seeing another video essay a couple of years ago where the essayist called Movie Hermione an "airbrushed Hermione" for being rid of her flaws or something of the like. Really reads different when you realise that that was simply text refusing to treat the character with contempt like the previous text did.
I always enjoy that you take the Doylean perspective in your essays when most other reviews take everything at face value.
Rowling does also have some ill will against extra shitty teachers (see her description of why she made Umbridge like that), but it's all warped by misogyny so badly that you can tell she thinks that it's just because female teachers exist. Hence the excuses when Snape does it.
Can i be totally honest? Making fun of someone like Jk Rowling is like shoot at an immbole object at close range, it's too easy
@@majorghoul9017 Eh...fair
What are you talking about? Movie Hermione had a great reason to marry Ron!
She loves charity...
great video. I'm not some expert of your channel, but I'm tired of folks whining about your existence while under the guise of trans allyship simply because you're mundanely flawed. where men are often embraced for their honesty, women, redundantly-obviously, further marginalized women, aren't afforded that same 'luxury'
Thank you ^w^
Oh yay!
Alan Rickmans Alan Rickmanly! 🤣
As someome who has come into critical literary methods of literacy, what you said about all the baked in, interconnected, sections of white supremacy. Its nothing but facts.
You cant examine a work without its merit, you cant examine the merit without its structure, you cant examine the structure until gou understand its fundementals, ans when gou understand that, you question ghe women in the work, the men in the works, the symbolism in the works, the materialism in it, etc.
You cannot end with just one point after tou thoroughly examine all ofher points about the work. You cannot seperate the art from the artist, because the artist is themselves, always, part of the art, explicitly, and implicitly.
Ngl I kinda needed to hear that naricissism can be learned and doesnt automatically make you a bad person, I got some reasurch I need to do after this video.
It's always fun to watch a new Lily Orchard video, but the fact this came out on my birthday made it super special. Thanks for the birthday present, Lily. :)
On a separate note, everything you've laid bare in the previous video about how JoJo can't keep her mouth shut gave me the final push I needed to part with my Harry Potter memorabilia. I dropped off the fandom around the time the last book came out, and I've never felt inclined to come back since everyone and their grandmothers were working themselves up about spoilers and how kids might need to have counseling due to all the death. Back then, I was an ignorant high school sophomore, and even I felt: "Okay, I'm not having fun anymore. When people dying has become so casual in your children's story about kids going to Wizard School, it's time to pack it in."
Happy bday Johnny e.e
@@sebastianchavez1225 Thank you :)
I appreciate the well-wishes.
Happy birthday!
Oh thank god it was the yellow one- snape LMAO
“Oh thank God it’s just the yellow one” 😂😂😂
She's got a point
It's funner if the skeleton of a good story is there but the writer is just incompetent as f___k rather then it being entirely garbage
Also my favourite gag of the video is "Alan Rickmans Alan Rickmanly" and if you missed it go find it because I was sent into hysterical laughter and had to pause the video for like 15 minutes because I was just stupid giggling and couldn't concentrate on anything XD
Are you aware that some of her stans really believe that Rowling was the first famous female author ? Or even more stupid. That she was the first author who teaches about class and wealth 😂
Me in the first half of the snape section: you know what this is actually interesting and full of potential. Why did I always dismiss Snape as a shit character I didn’t care about?
Me after minute 20 in the second half: Ohh, that’s why. Yeah that’s why.
Fucking dammit JoJo, you just couldn’t go without abusing children huh?
*Lmfao Harry Potter puppet pals in my ringtone idk why*
8:35. Thanks for bringing that point up. No one on UA-cam even the channels dedicated to discussing Harry Potter want to talk about how Ron was written as emotionally and psychologically abusive towards Hermione. The channels would rather analyze the relationship than anything else.
I'm suddenly glad i didn't read the books as a child. I mean it's literally in the genre i ate up the Most as a child and still do. I don't know if it's because i already saw the movies but that didn't stop me with Eragon. Best guess is the summary wasn't attention grabbing enough to bother.
Someday I want to do an essay on toxic anime characters and how people overpraise them. I plannon pissing off alot toxic fanbases by addressing that crap and videos like this fire me up to work on those sctipts. Thank you Lily.
3:14 I've met a potterhead who defends that side plot for some(internalised racism) reason.
Your clowning on Rowling gives me stuff to look out for when I start writing.
Also, it helps me realize how and why I lost interest in Harry Potter.
0:39 that is a wonderful reaction image
Lily, I always knew you have good taste, but fucking hell I wasn't expecting the Magical Metamorphosis fanfiction to be AS GOOD as it was. Kudos to whoever wrote it bc the shitty characters got less shitty, the good characters got better and the new H. Potter might as well be the cutest character to ever come out of a Harry Potter fanfiction 🥰
i love how i had to pause 14 seconds in to stop laughing and then by the end of it i had a lot of interesting shit to think about and felt like i learned a lot. thank you so much for all your hard work lily! i hope you and mikaila are doing well 💕
I was 10 when I read the books. When I read about the SPEW plot I was so confused I had to read it like 5 times just to process it.
If the books had explored those aspects of Ron's character you mentioned and had him go through that arc, he wouldn't be such a divisive character. This video explains why I had a lingering ick while reading these books as a kid.
we have a bunch of harry potter books in my school's library and nobody ever read them because of how big they where. and if you read them you where automatically a nerd. made no sense
Holy shit. I'm Irish... and I went to a Christian Brothers school... And let me tell you that the schools have not gotten better. I graduated in 2018
Yeah I'm going to re-watch the fuck out of this
As someone essentially forced to read the first Harry Potter book in highschool for lack of better literature, I was surprised by how good some of the ideas in it were. Snape as a character has inspired one of my own. That series is not wholly rotten and sinister. There are good ideas when you get down into it. But that's one of the problems. You have to dig down and peel off all the layers of garbage to get there. Shoutout to people who are genuinely committed to rewriting the series, because that sounds genuinely hellish.
After watching movies, I wondered whether I should read the books. Guess I dodged a bullet there.
i'll never forget how our literature highschool teacher (who i loved to death) made us read 4 or 5 chapters of one of the books (can't for the life of me remember which one) and i couldn't do it bc whenever i pick them up my immediate reaction to the second paragraph was "omg joanne stop being such a boomer"
i still got an a+ bc for once i was not the only one who read all of the material, so i just half-listened to what my classmates discussed before class and retained all of it. the woman really was lucky she accidentally wrote good things into otherwise kinda meh books
Wanna hear a joke?……..Adam Driver plays Snape in the upcoming tv show.
Don't say shit like that! You never know when Apollo is listening!
I think Allan Rickman is the Snape that Rowling wanted to do but didnt. Not because the actions he takes when shit's hitting the fan, but because the way he acts as a teacher during his classes. Its not just "he's a ass with everyone" is "he's abusive with everyone"
I generally praise the actors in the films for taking such dogshit material and spinning it into an enjoyable experience. The collaborational effort by everyone making the films needed to move some damn mountains.
I think I speak for a lot of us when I say I'd love to see this become a mini series
I was not expecting Hermione should cut off contact with ron and run away with luna but I agree
A personal question, but the AO3 Section, you specifically excluded mind control/mind break. Is there a reason for it? Is it explained somewhere else that I should watch?
In the context of AO3 they're rape tags
24:41 oh yeah, i remember that when i read it the firt time i was CERTAIN that Harry was poisoned by some potion or under the influence if some curse, and got extremely frustrated when the book was over and the poisoning wasn't explained, just to find out in later books that somehow it wasn't a curse, just a crush. What the hell?
Great Video! Really enjoyed that last one also. When you said you might make this a regular series did you mean making fun of rowling more or generally this format for different authors?
Calling Rowling a TERF is giving her too much credit. The trans-exclusionary part is correct. But I don't think she has ever had a thought in her entire life which is either feminist or radical.
You have a point, the fact that we call conservative women "radfems" was always kinda stupid.
The section with Jane Elliot was shocking. I’m shocked, I’m horrified.
my ass who had undiagnosed ODD: wait a minute hold on
So this is a me thing, but I’ve had to rewatch this for two reasons. One is that Lily/Mikaila (I don’t know whose voice is who’s yet, I stumbled upon this video recently) has a passionate punch with each word, and I’ve been left cackling to myself at some of the quips-“back in the pantry” being the one that caught me the most off guard. The second reason is to make sure I’m digesting everything properly because the subject matter brought up is deeply important, not to mention interesting, yet trying to digest it all at once has proven difficult. Whether that’s because I’m a dumbass or simply because the human mind has its limits…I’ll leave that to the jury. I’ve also just realized this is a part 2 and now I shall do the same thing for the first video
29:20 Something fascinating about the Birth Dearth book mentioned is that if you try to find a hard copy of it, you will have to pay outrageous prices for it. When I looked, Amazon had one copy for sale for over a thousand dollars. Wow
More of this, please! I love making fun of JK Rowling! Making transphobes seeth is my favorite pass time!
Me seeing that it's making fun of JK time: >:3
Our Queen Liliy should re-write Harry Potter. She knows whats what.
Yes but there are more important things that she can be doing, like play Pokémon or giving her wife more cuddles
@@dokikicingene1517 true.
This is the real disturbing, stalker behavior that Lily will NEVER fucking speak out against. I swear, some of you obsessive, rabid stans of hers just take lines straight out of Misery!
She's been playing around with some rewrite ideas on her Tumblr
@@jamiewebber7485 What did they say that was stalkerish? Queen? That's what a lot of people call creators or even friends these days. I'm not even a particular fan of Lily. I don't see what op said wrong.
Thank you, Lilly. This will give me very good entertainment while I cozily lay in my bed after a long day with my family. U da best
Im so happy that you keep jk hate to her actual work and not her twitter mess. I was a potterhead as a child. Keyword child because i outgrew the series. I then reread the books and im like wow this was... i didn't have good tastes
Talking about her Twitter stuff requires keeping up to date with it
17:33-17:35 Snape jumping onto the scene with his first words, it sounds like his voice was put through a deepening filter, like how voices sound in slow-motion movie scenes lmao
15:04 Urdnot Wrex? Really? I never got the impression he was _meant_ to be morally grey. His whole character is based around wanting what's best for his species. He's not even all that 'toxic' of a character either. He's a man who's seen his people dragged through the mud and shattered for his entired centuries long life. He's jaded and he's got grudges.
Wrex also never actually does anything 'evil' any more so than the rest of the Normandy Crew. The only times he ever actually turns on you are on Virmire when you have to destroy a cure for the bio-weapon that's plagued his people for over a millennia in order to stop Saren (at which point you can still talk him down), or in the third game when you already betrayed his trust and sabotaged the second attempt at a cure. In either instance he's rightly fucking pissed with you, and you aren't giving him any reason not to be.
In the first Mass Effect, Wrex is saddled with the job of being the one who mostly suggests renegade options. He broke out of this in the Second and Third game.
@@LilianOrchard 2 things
Firstly, holy shit that was a quick reply. Kudos to that I guess.
Secondly, that's a very fair point. However it is _slightly_ undermined by the influence system in ME1 which could lead to instances like (hilariously enough) Garrus telling you to kill the Rachni Queen and Wrex telling you to spare her. So you _could_ break him out of that role through your own actions In the first game, though unless you knew about the influence system and were actively trying, it wasn't likely to happen. Your point still stands though and I will concede that he's not quite as well developed in the first game.
This was just a delight to listen to, always nice to hear Joke Rolling getting lambasted.
I got nothing else to add, this video is perfect. Doing amazing as always Lily.
I think Hermione's _real_ big flaw is a degree of callousness, misanthropy, and willingness to do horrible things if she can justify it in her ultimately-somewhat-flexible views on what is and isn't against the "rules" (and even that kinda goes by the wayside sometimes). Fortunately, fanfiction does what Joanne is too cowardly to and Gay Deadly Polymath Hermione is the best evolution of the character, no one will ever convince me otherwise.
@@Abcdefg-tf7cu I think you're lost.
God I love your content.
I never read the book series as a kid, a friend of my did so when we would watch the movies she would tell me how parts of the movies were different from the books and the slavery and the sexism went over my little kid head.
Further proof my love of the books is purely based in nostalgia.
Barty shouldn't have done his Winky like that
An Intersectional Analysis of Harry Potter was not what I expected but HellYea I'm here for it now XD
Jane Elliot ATE and left NO CRUMBS. Love that. I love your videos!!
It was only a matter of time.
I'm so glad that I wasn't the only one that thought Ron and Hermione ending up together was really weird, like even when I was a young kid and first read the book I thought it was really a strange choice.
I remember being a kid and thinking the women in the HP books were mindblowing for how well rounded and progressive they were ;-; and that really says a lot about the women in the stories I was allowed access to at that age, rather than being a compliment to jojo.
I like that as this comes out: hogwash legos gets a whopping 4.66GB update and I still treat it like ancient food in my fridge. I dare not open it…