Blue water v green water navy - what's the difference?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 лют 2024
- Until now, nations have worked on the basis of green water and blue water deployments - based on home defence or projecting power to react to global threats.
Now, however, traditional naval strategy is being challenged by new technology and tactics.
#forcesnews #navy #military #war #warships #technology
Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
Check out our website: www.forces.net/
Facebook: / forcestv
Instagram: forcesnews...
X: / forcesnews
They should prob think about putting some kinda listening devices along the route of the trans Atlantic data cables
Sweden has excellent green water capabilities…
The color of the water. Follow me for more ingenious tips.
Any water where your ship is sunk totally sucks.
Here is the difference green water ship sinks the crew walks to shore. Blue water ship sinks the crew use life boats to row to shore.
Спасибо за резюме к этому видео.
Спасибо за резюме к этому видео.
think of the drones as simple torpedos, it is a problem, but not as much as people believe, the reality is that the tactis and technologies already exist.
They make it sound like they haven't been considering this for the last few years as this tech as rapidly continued to grow lol. You'd be an ignorant leader/military commander if you ignored this threat emerging over the last decade...
The MOD is unable to manage to replace Harpoon in a timely manner leaving the surface fleet without an anti shipping threat so how they’re going to react to a fast moving threat matrix is anybodies guess. But the good money is on slowly and badly at great expense.
The RN has some amazing escorts regardless of age, it’s the crews that make them and they’re world class but unfortunately the RN is let down time and again by the MOD which is anything but world class.
Это не удивительно - то, что вы изложили: в этом даже - проявление Традиций Royal Navy. Вот поэтому Ministry of Defence - и не играет такой важной роли в мирное время: потому как главным защитником Home Island является (и всегда являлся) Royal Navy.
Только и всего.
They bought Naval Strike Missiles and are already deploying Type 23's with them aboard.
@@SCscoutguy Thanks.
@@SCscoutguy the NSM is the stopgap replacement for the Block 1C Harpoon which had to have a life extension to 2023 because the replacement Future Cruise/Anti Ship Warfare missile isn’t due to enter service until to 2030’s. The Block 1C Harpoon are a relic of the 80’s and should have been retired sometime before 2020 but had to be extended until 2023 to allow the NSM to be fitted so the RN has a feasible surface threat.
The out of service date of Harpoon was known by the MOD and they’re the ones driving the FC/ASW programme with the French so they know the likely developmental timescales of the new missile so to have to extend the life of Harpoon by 5 years to be able to sort out a ‘temporary’ replacement in NSM knowing the planned replacement is still a decade away is incompetence. They should have been on top of the Harpoon replacement for it’s original out of service date, because extension or not there’s a reason why those missiles were up for retirement and it’s because they are considered obsolete.
At least they managed to get it right with the NSM, that’s a worthwhile weapons system to deploy.
Although obsolete or not with the performance of the Moskva perhaps there’s a case to say that the Block 1C Harpoon were still capable of performing in a peer to peer conflict with the Russians. I’m just glad I’m no longer in a position to find out!
There were plenty of options but the MOD just decided to take the worst one
The best option was the US made LRASM. The LRASM can be used by F-35s and P-8s, additionally there is VLS capability as well top side container launcher models
Adding it to the Typhoon wouldnt an issue as the LRASM actually weighs less than the Storm Shadow
The LRASM would have given the UK a very capable weapon against all ship types but usable by both the RN and RAF
FYI, Lockheed is testing it from HIMARS and if that is success, the trifecta for the UK
The NSM is great light weapon for coastal defense but for deep water combat, its useless
Up to 1798 Russia had an outstanding Blue Water Navy. But when Catherine the Great died subsequent leaders focused on land defense and they started letting their navy decline. It got so bad that when Russia and Japan got into a war, Japan clobbered the Russian Navy. In WW II the Russian navy was the worst of all the allies and it was up to the US Navy and British navy to do the sea battles. Since then their Navy has become a real joke, except for their submarines but even with those, when you think of a Russian sub you think of the Kursk.
Thise drones wouldnt gwt anywhere near a Western war ship see outin most western countrys arnt using 50 year old ahips tgat should of been retired before the turn of the millennium
What would Trump do about this situation, oh that's right, there wouldn't be any war:)
#45 is a wannabe dictator and deluded fantasist. He belongs in Fulton County Jail where he will be accountable for his actions and not above the law 🇺🇸
when will you stop lying, calling the sea drones that Ukraine uses Ukrainian? Ukraine is a country with a destroyed economy - they cannot produce drones. They will soon not be able to bake bread for their population, and you are talking about Ukrainian maritime drones. It's disgusting
Is it making you cry ?
@@paulhellawell5920 No . This just shows the hypocrisy of the author of this video.
They spent 1/3 of their gdp on defense and they couldn't possibly have manufactured a sea drone? ok, cope.
@@gnihtemos69 the only thing they could do, it seems to me, was to provide a high-explosive fragmentation bomb for the charge. This technology has been developed since WWII and a huge number of them were stored in Ukraine.
@@Imprudentman well you just answered your own question, probably a bot haha