At 3:07 that is the Marshal Shaposhnikov which was returned post refit. It looks different from other udaloys in which its second 100mm AK-190 gun was removed and replaced with modular 16 VLS cells for oniks antiship and kalibr cruise missile. Its large SS-N-14 anti submarine/anti ship missiles was replaced by smaller Kh-35. The remaining udaloys would be retrofitted and upgraded based on that giving them better land strike ability
The Russians do build 'em pretty. Their ships and aircraft all have sleek, sexy lines that make them so nice. And dangerous af. I used to read a lot of Tom Clancy books, both fiction and non-fiction and he was very keen on the Russian designs.
Yes, the Soviet Navy put some "sexy" stuff in the water. My personal favorite is the Victor III nuclear-attack submarines. That towed array pod on the stern fin was crazy genius and wicked cool. The exquisite Sierras and the stunning Akulas would adopt it, but my heart is still with the Victor III.
i dont like the russian designs in planes. i mean outside looks good but practical part: the cannopee (Cockpit) dunno name. is almost in every plane a hard back. so you cant look behind u. wich is an disadvantage, hence the need to put more into 3d trustvectoring then western planes. stealth in su57 only frontal not sides, wich means it has to be lkucky to be flying frontal towards enemy. and in cas eof f35 f22 it wil not know where they are and cant track em as ez as they can track him. even with ground radars and radar planes. they are great at shows empty no weapons etc. but for example yust recent 20-20 alot of planes in russia are being equiped withg radars etc that even the EU and america had for atleast 10-20+ years. i mean look in syria where they had to use american mafde gps systems to drop vbombs becouse theirs didnt work., you should always think yourt opponant is way better then u are so you improve even more skill. and even witrh f35 and f22 already with so many upgrtades while the su57 is stil in early acces and only 8 are made and 4 active for duty., so lo oking cool vs tech is going to be diffrent. also a10 IMO stays coolest design. even tho it has no radars etc amnd is oldscool.
@@marcschepers8144 Russians not gonna be fighting worldwide just in Russian turf like east Europe or North Pacific they have ground radars which will negate the bad plane radars
@@r.p5380 russia army is slowly in every old soviet country giving propoganda that everything that happend is the wests fault. russia is gearing up. and i always say: If theres someone who is intent on beating u up, and you think by acting passive that he isnt going to hit you. then u are a fool. you either strike first or you fight back with everything you have in order to do as much damage. Russia is this bully at the moment. sure america nato etc bully aswell. but russia was the one who before trum,p retreated from the nucliair treaty to produce hypersonivc nukes, torrpedo nukes etc. so why wait for him to strike first . hi sintentions in syria libya al;l old soviet states shows hes gearing up. and yes ukraine made a deal to be guareanteed safety by the russians if tghey got rid opf the nukes. i say arm them with nukes and also low yield nukes. make sure if any of us get hit, russia wont be a part of the map again. you dont go half in to a fiught you go full in. russia has as much to lose as us. and yeah and want to see my kids grow upo. but i be damned if we dont stand up against a bully
A lot of older ships still have use, especially when it comes to guarding maritime trade. It's just we're about to see an age of AI-assisted equipment that's going to put this stuff too far behind the curve to be useful for international warfare.
@@martindevon3204 Russian ships break down just as much, however you are showing you have a premade notion that Russian ships are inferior so before you continue please neutralise your bias
The russians designed their own marine engines and power plants since 2014 as stated my Mr. Shoigu. UEC or united engine corporation has undertook the work. Its called the import substitution program. You might want to do some fact checking before broadcasting. In the old days under the soviet union the work was spread out throughout the different states to employ lesser regions with work, as was the case in ukraine. Since the collapse of relations with ukraine and sanctions from the united states and the european union they decided to go forward with marine engine building from scratch within russia proper since then.
Back in the day, it always seemed that if something got "stuck" (didn't matter which nation) in cold weather, there was always a Russian (Soviet) ice breaker coming to the rescue.
7:30 Vladivostok bridge. Conversely, no bridge is allowed between Portsmouth and Gosport over the neck of Portsmouth Harbour with the motif of bridge being prime enemy target to block the harbour and the naval base. Russian navy isn’t that worried by the look of it.
Of course they are advanced. people who think Russia uses old stuff is dumb. Russia modernized his whole army. Thats why it is smaller, but more mobile and advanced. The army of Russia is focussed on defense and not offensive. That's why Russia has the most tanks of the world.. Thats one sign the red army is build on defense.. The US army is build on offensive thats why they have more aircraft carriers..
The US focuses on Naval strength because 95% military invasions would come via the sea. The RF focuses on Army strength because 95% military invasions would come via land. Also your argument falls apart when Russian tanks are designed for offense, it's why they have less armor and move faster. They are designed to overrun enemy positions as fast as possible to support an infantry surge. US tanks are slower, more heavily armored and hit harder. Both nations still inherent their military doctrines from the cold war. Russia feared a US naval invasion so they focused submarines because 1 sub was a threat to multiple surface ships. The US feared a land invasion of europe so they focused on Tanks which could take as big a beating as possible.
You think all tanks are light.. do your homework man. You know nothing about the russian army and you know nothing about the US army..... since when have russia sn offensive army man?since never because russia is a defence land .USA is offensive thats why they have 20 aircraft carriers and russia only one. Know ur history man.. russia was never an offensive country.. russia does not like war, like the US does.
Umm no, No I can’t say they’re more advanced than I thought. The better question is; Do they possess enough to make a difference when facing a enemy ship fleet
They are heavily armed compared to American or western ships. Four 30mm Kashatan gatling guns! - I suspect that up close they are just 100% beastmode. Those Kashtans could probably wreck any surface ship that came into their firing envelope.
Ces destroyers ont le même problème que le Moskwa : une dca d il y a 40 ans, incapable d intercepter un exocet ou un harpoon. Avec deux croiseurs Slava ça fait une dizaine de navires qui doivent être moder nisés ou retirés.
Again, the author is off topic, project 1155 is classified as a BOD (Large anti-submarine Ship), not a destroyer or frigate. Its equipment and weapons are sharpened to combat submarines (submarines). According to its characteristics, it quietly provides anti-submarine defense of the entire order in the squadron.
Dude what? Project 1155 is the Udaloy. NATO classifies it as a destroyer, the Soviet Union gave it the project name Fregat, not correlating it to an actual frigate
Only ONE Udaloy II class destroyer was built. Only 7 or the original 12 Udaloy I class ships are still in service (several of which are currently out of service undergoing overhaul/refit upgrade). Not much of a threat.
Indian destroyers have a shortage of VLS tubes when compared to destroyers of other countries of similar displacement. This suggests inefficient ship design. Also the propulsion system, most sensors and weapons on Indian destroyers are just sourced from other countries so there is not much unique to talk about in a video.
@@tomjohnston3393 When the brahmos will hit your British destroyer it will be ravaged and by the way the tomahawk your ship uses is American. And you will tell we make it in our island then I must say Barak 8, MF Star and many others are Indo Israel product the propulsion system of Barak 8 is from DRDO and more than 2/3 rd of the components is indigenous and ofcourse propulsion system is where we lack. And lacking vls cells I must say brahmos is way more heavier than other of your sub sonic missiles which we can shoot it down by our Barak 8 and by the fact AMERICA DID A STUDY AND ITS OWN DESTROYER CAN'T STOP 2 BRAHMOS COMING AT A TIME BECAUSE its radar cross section is like a little bird and you get only 20 sec to response. So our destroyer is way more ahead of your BRITISH DESTROYER. SO GO GET GOOD INFORMATION BUDDY I DON'T WANNA SPOIL YOUR IMAGE
Опять автор не в теме, проект 1155 по классификации является БПК (Большой противолодочный корабль), а не эсминец или фрегат. Его оборудование и вооружение заточено для борьбы с ПЛ (подводными лодками). По своим характеристикам он спокойно обеспечивает противолодочную оборону всего ордера в эскадре.
The Udaloy class of Destroyer is a very capable ship, it's real downfall is numbers. If the Russians had as many Udaloys as the US Navy has Burke class ships then NATO would be in real trouble, but they don't and they won't...so while the Udaloy is a very capable ship they would be quickly hunted down in a real shooting war by the vastly superior numbers of NATO ships.
Russia has a very sneaky trick in that they have hundreds of frigates/corvettes, all of which come with missile tubes that could fire hypersonic missiles
@@r.p5380 everything is right. Russia cannot come to visit you, but it is very dangerous to think that Russia has no teeth in the sea. Light corvettes don't have hundreds of launchers. But there are quite a few of them and they can even be found in fresh rivers and lakes. And they have 4-8 full-fledged long-range anti-ship missiles. And despite the devastation in the 90s, Russia still has the most powerful anti-ship systems
Irrelevant. Any major confrontation will escalate to nuclear exchange and the end of civilization as we know it. What do you prefer, to be incinerated or to be frozen to death?
I remember the "Hood" was the proud of the English Navy in the 40s ...... a floating fortress ..... for 4 Minutes. War - though technical impressive - is cruel shit! We´re all friends, we are one!
As expected, many people in the comments are unaware of Soviet naval doctrine. Geographically, Russia has extremely limited access to both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The Soviets knew it, accepted it, and effectively designed their navy around it. As opposed to power-projection like the US Navy, the Soviets geared their navy toward defending waters around the coast. That's not a blue-water strategy, nor is it a weak one; it's just more defensive.
@@istvansipos9940 - "Everyone" (meaning poor countries with a small military budget) want to buy Russian tech because it's CHEAP! It's also garbage. Every major Soviet/Russian client state that had an armed conflict with a Western client state in the last 3 decades had their Soviet/Russian equipment utterly destroyed. Both Gulf wars and the wars between Egypt and Israel being prime examples.
The biggest disadvantage the Russians have is they are just a navy of one. All of their technology upgrades are developed in-house. The NATO countries integrate and share their advance technologies in their new ship design. Commercial western companies are competing to sell their advance equipment to NATO navies. You know how far behind the Russian technology is when they say their brand new sonar system; ”The Zvezda sonar system is considered by its designers to be the equivalent in terms of overall performance of the AN/SQS-53 on US destroyers…”, comparing it to an old US SONAR system and not being better. The US alone has 62 Arleigh Burke Class destroyers and 2 Zumwalt destroyers, plus the rest of the NATO countries with their modern destroyers. The other big disadvantage the Russians have, is they now are without strong allies like NATO on their side. The difference between NATO and the Russians, when NATO conducts large scale war games, they conduct their large scale war games with their allies. When the Russians have large scale war games, they play mostly by themselves or sometimes with the Chinese; it’s good to have friends
Well when you make a video that has a voice over reading a wiki page updated in 2009 you get what you get. Russian tech may not be as flashy nor costly but its still effective. No matter what you compare its the same old story. A Russian boot covers your foot, you can walk in it fight in it and it has rope laces lasts a long time. Great foot wear $20 a pair! A NATO boot has a carbon fiber arch support and an adjustable heel catch with kevlar stitch and ballistic nylon....you can walk in it you can fight in it and it costs $480 a pair........While this is not a factual example it illustrates the point.
@@adrianepenalosa8875 Name a single time a Russia ship was sunk by a USN ship? Never took place. If however your argument is that the US with 700 billion a year budget is more powerful than a Russia and its 60 billion? Of course it is.
I could not see how the Udaloy class is more advanced than someone probably thought, as the video title suggested... It is a rather old design that is being modernised / upgraded with newer electronics and weapons, as in every other navy...
Boa noite Deus abençoe sempre todos os aliados do Brazil o presidente da Rússia Vladimir puti e o presidente da china chixipin o presidente da Coreia do Norte kindioun da penicila Deus proteja todos os dias de guerra Deus pai criador do céu e da terra amém glória a Deus poderoso sempre 🙏🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 parabéns pelo seu dia abençoados
با عرض سلام و خسته نباشید خدمت ادمین کانال میلیتاری برنامه هایی که تولید میکنید عالیه اما تنها نقص برنامه ها تون دوبله نشدن برنامه هاتون به زبان شیرین فارسی هست اگر برنامه هاتون به زبان شیرین فارسی دوبله بشوند عالی میشه و دنبال کنندگان شما انشاالله چند برابر خواهند شد
.The real point of a large aircraft carrier is to launch the The Northrop Grumman E-2 Hawkeye (Eye in the sky). Its radar our ranges any surface ship. Its radar disk is much too large to put on and helicopter or vertical lift jet. The US will alway see the other side first . Even non-catapult carries can not launch them from a ramp deck. A Russia ship will be detected hours before it detects a carrier group.
At 3:07 that is the Marshal Shaposhnikov which was returned post refit. It looks different from other udaloys in which its second 100mm AK-190 gun was removed and replaced with modular 16 VLS cells for oniks antiship and kalibr cruise missile. Its large SS-N-14 anti submarine/anti ship missiles was replaced by smaller Kh-35. The remaining udaloys would be retrofitted and upgraded based on that giving them better land strike ability
True
The Russians do build 'em pretty. Their ships and aircraft all have sleek, sexy lines that make them so nice. And dangerous af. I used to read a lot of Tom Clancy books, both fiction and non-fiction and he was very keen on the Russian designs.
True, but the Burke and the Ticon are also very easy on the eyes.
Yes, the Soviet Navy put some "sexy" stuff in the water. My personal favorite is the Victor III nuclear-attack submarines. That towed array pod on the stern fin was crazy genius and wicked cool. The exquisite Sierras and the stunning Akulas would adopt it, but my heart is still with the Victor III.
i dont like the russian designs in planes. i mean outside looks good but practical part: the cannopee (Cockpit) dunno name. is almost in every plane a hard back. so you cant look behind u. wich is an disadvantage, hence the need to put more into 3d trustvectoring then western planes. stealth in su57 only frontal not sides, wich means it has to be lkucky to be flying frontal towards enemy. and in cas eof f35 f22 it wil not know where they are and cant track em as ez as they can track him. even with ground radars and radar planes.
they are great at shows empty no weapons etc. but for example yust recent 20-20 alot of planes in russia are being equiped withg radars etc that even the EU and america had for atleast 10-20+ years. i mean look in syria where they had to use american mafde gps systems to drop vbombs becouse theirs didnt work.,
you should always think yourt opponant is way better then u are so you improve even more skill. and even witrh f35 and f22 already with so many upgrtades while the su57 is stil in early acces and only 8 are made and 4 active for duty.,
so lo oking cool vs tech is going to be diffrent. also a10 IMO stays coolest design. even tho it has no radars etc amnd is oldscool.
@@marcschepers8144 Russians not gonna be fighting worldwide just in Russian turf like east Europe or North Pacific they have ground radars which will negate the bad plane radars
@@r.p5380 russia army is slowly in every old soviet country giving propoganda that everything that happend is the wests fault. russia is gearing up. and i always say:
If theres someone who is intent on beating u up, and you think by acting passive that he isnt going to hit you. then u are a fool. you either strike first or you fight back with everything you have in order to do as much damage. Russia is this bully at the moment. sure america nato etc bully aswell. but russia was the one who before trum,p retreated from the nucliair treaty to produce hypersonivc nukes, torrpedo nukes etc. so why wait for him to strike first . hi sintentions in syria libya al;l old soviet states shows hes gearing up. and yes ukraine made a deal to be guareanteed safety by the russians if tghey got rid opf the nukes. i say arm them with nukes and also low yield nukes. make sure if any of us get hit, russia wont be a part of the map again. you dont go half in to a fiught you go full in. russia has as much to lose as us.
and yeah and want to see my kids grow upo. but i be damned if we dont stand up against a bully
Some beautiful destroyers. When I was stationed in the UK I got to go on the Admiral Levchenko and the Admiral Chabanenko during port visits.
Wow 😳 it's my drean to go inside big warship
When was this???
Its a old ship but still very capable of modern naval warfare if upgraded properly it stll has quite a few years left in her
A lot of older ships still have use, especially when it comes to guarding maritime trade. It's just we're about to see an age of AI-assisted equipment that's going to put this stuff too far behind the curve to be useful for international warfare.
Russian ships have more armaments and capabilities than American ships
@@clb_52 that's why they're always broken down. To difficult and costly to service
@@martindevon3204 all ships break down
@@martindevon3204 Russian ships break down just as much, however you are showing you have a premade notion that Russian ships are inferior so before you continue please neutralise your bias
Very impressive that’s what a war ship should look like 👍
I think that design is lacking in stealth
Lacking in stealth but at the same time sexy and menacing, if that were a woman I would steer clear and leave her alone
No lacking anti quefer tech and not Soviet it’s qufer ppls Soviet cruiser run if you see it . During the civil war killed quefer battle quefer ship
The russians designed their own marine engines and power plants since 2014 as stated my Mr. Shoigu. UEC or united engine corporation has undertook the work. Its called the import substitution program. You might want to do some fact checking before broadcasting. In the old days under the soviet union the work was spread out throughout the different states to employ lesser regions with work, as was the case in ukraine. Since the collapse of relations with ukraine and sanctions from the united states and the european union they decided to go forward with marine engine building from scratch within russia proper since then.
I love Russian technology, it's sophisticated and advance. From Philippines
Oo nga, sana sa kanila na lng tayo bumili ng mga gamit..
@@RasPutintheGreat rusian equipment is only paper in usa
@@RasPutintheGreat Russian technology is not that good
@@Shammie19 Propaganda 🤡
🇮🇳❤🔥❤🇷🇺
Back in the day, it always seemed that if something got "stuck" (didn't matter which nation) in cold weather, there was always a Russian (Soviet) ice breaker coming to the rescue.
Nuclear powered offcourse!
Ah yes... the mighty power of Soviet help!
Since I live in Korea, I first saw a Russian ship at the International Fleet Review in 2018, and it has a different power than the United States.
7:30 Vladivostok bridge. Conversely, no bridge is allowed between Portsmouth and Gosport over the neck of Portsmouth Harbour with the motif of bridge being prime enemy target to block the harbour and the naval base. Russian navy isn’t that worried by the look of it.
Thanks i was wondering what bridge that was. I first was thinking the bosphorus or the new bridge in crimea.
The Russians sure know how to arm their ships with missiles, guns, rockets, etc.
Of course they are advanced. people who think Russia uses old stuff is dumb. Russia modernized his whole army. Thats why it is smaller, but more mobile and advanced. The army of Russia is focussed on defense and not offensive. That's why Russia has the most tanks of the world.. Thats one sign the red army is build on defense.. The US army is build on offensive thats why they have more aircraft carriers..
The US focuses on Naval strength because 95% military invasions would come via the sea.
The RF focuses on Army strength because 95% military invasions would come via land.
Also your argument falls apart when Russian tanks are designed for offense, it's why they have less armor and move faster. They are designed to overrun enemy positions as fast as possible to support an infantry surge. US tanks are slower, more heavily armored and hit harder.
Both nations still inherent their military doctrines from the cold war.
Russia feared a US naval invasion so they focused submarines because 1 sub was a threat to multiple surface ships.
The US feared a land invasion of europe so they focused on Tanks which could take as big a beating as possible.
@@louiscypher4186 and what kind og naval strength?? Aircraft carriers.
You think all tanks are light.. do your homework man. You know nothing about the russian army and you know nothing about the US army..... since when have russia sn offensive army man?since never because russia is a defence land .USA is offensive thats why they have 20 aircraft carriers and russia only one. Know ur history man.. russia was never an offensive country.. russia does not like war, like the US does.
What a bullshit man..
You say so much shit.. and you dont even know that a lot of aircrafts belong to the navy instead of airforce.
Was it that Admiral Levchenko that was used in the movie 'Hunter Killer' by Gerard Butler?
Umm no, No I can’t say they’re more advanced than I thought. The better question is; Do they possess enough to make a difference when facing a enemy ship fleet
Their ship are designed to be able to fight on their own with little to no support from other ship
@@Gow-13510 most Russian ships are
I just want the title of that background music.
with this TORPEDO boat we can be the masters of all seas it's amazing
Such a beautiful ship, gotta love allot of boom boom(:
They are heavily armed compared to American or western ships. Four 30mm Kashatan gatling guns! - I suspect that up close they are just 100% beastmode. Those Kashtans could probably wreck any surface ship that came into their firing envelope.
and then from a distance they have to deal with the 100m naval artillery gun. it will be difficult for surface ships to come close to this vessel.
They seem to be using the speed flag. But did they equipped the Detonation flag?
No need!
If undetected +10% speed and thanks to the citadell layout, no detonations possible....cause - russian bias :)
@@k98_zock_tv47 🇺🇸💪💪💪💪💪
Ces destroyers ont le même problème que le Moskwa : une dca d il y a 40 ans, incapable d intercepter un exocet ou un harpoon.
Avec deux croiseurs Slava ça fait une dizaine de navires qui doivent être moder nisés ou retirés.
It's like a prototype that they've made one of but it doesn't really function from the inside out
Again, the author is off topic, project 1155 is classified as a BOD (Large anti-submarine Ship), not a destroyer or frigate. Its equipment and weapons are sharpened to combat submarines (submarines). According to its characteristics, it quietly provides anti-submarine defense of the entire order in the squadron.
Dude what? Project 1155 is the Udaloy. NATO classifies it as a destroyer, the Soviet Union gave it the project name Fregat, not correlating it to an actual frigate
@@yuripotecknov5164 В каком полку служили, юноша? В штабе НАТО?
@@legkostypovI’m confused by what your asking
Only ONE Udaloy II class destroyer was built. Only 7 or the original 12 Udaloy I class ships are still in service (several of which are currently out of service undergoing overhaul/refit upgrade). Not much of a threat.
Please make a dedicated video on Vishakapatnam class destroyer please please please please 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺 a request please 🥺🥺🥺🥺
Indian destroyers have a shortage of VLS tubes when compared to destroyers of other countries of similar displacement. This suggests inefficient ship design. Also the propulsion system, most sensors and weapons on Indian destroyers are just sourced from other countries so there is not much unique to talk about in a video.
You can see that video on "military detective" and I think that channel is more informative than this one
Sorry those only exist in ones mind!
@@tomjohnston3393 When the brahmos will hit your British destroyer it will be ravaged and by the way the tomahawk your ship uses is American. And you will tell we make it in our island then I must say Barak 8, MF Star and many others are Indo Israel product the propulsion system of Barak 8 is from DRDO and more than 2/3 rd of the components is indigenous and ofcourse propulsion system is where we lack. And lacking vls cells I must say brahmos is way more heavier than other of your sub sonic missiles which we can shoot it down by our Barak 8 and by the fact AMERICA DID A STUDY AND ITS OWN DESTROYER CAN'T STOP 2 BRAHMOS COMING AT A TIME BECAUSE its radar cross section is like a little bird and you get only 20 sec to response. So our destroyer is way more ahead of your BRITISH DESTROYER. SO GO GET GOOD INFORMATION BUDDY I DON'T WANNA SPOIL YOUR IMAGE
@@akirayuu7318 thanks bro I have seen it. I request because I like his tone and editing in a way
0:04 is that Admiral Panteleyev
Опять автор не в теме, проект 1155 по классификации является БПК (Большой противолодочный корабль), а не эсминец или фрегат. Его оборудование и вооружение заточено для борьбы с ПЛ (подводными лодками). По своим характеристикам он спокойно обеспечивает противолодочную оборону всего ордера в эскадре.
I love it when you say Udaloy.
You know some things should remain a secret until the need to surprise... thats the way it should be...
Cuantas toneladas desplaza?
The Udaloy class of Destroyer is a very capable ship, it's real downfall is numbers. If the Russians had as many Udaloys as the US Navy has Burke class ships then NATO would be in real trouble, but they don't and they won't...so while the Udaloy is a very capable ship they would be quickly hunted down in a real shooting war by the vastly superior numbers of NATO ships.
Russia has a very sneaky trick in that they have hundreds of frigates/corvettes, all of which come with missile tubes that could fire hypersonic missiles
@@r.p5380 everything is right. Russia cannot come to visit you, but it is very dangerous to think that Russia has no teeth in the sea. Light corvettes don't have hundreds of launchers. But there are quite a few of them and they can even be found in fresh rivers and lakes. And they have 4-8 full-fledged long-range anti-ship missiles. And despite the devastation in the 90s, Russia still has the most powerful anti-ship systems
Irrelevant. Any major confrontation will escalate to nuclear exchange and the end of civilization as we know it. What do you prefer, to be incinerated or to be frozen to death?
DAMN WHY DO RUSSIANS MAKE SOME OF THE BEST LOOKING SHIPS IN THE WORLD..LOOK AT THEM LINES! ITS LIKE LINES USED ON SOME FAMOUS SUPER YACHTS!
Yes it is much more advanced than one should think, for one it floats.
Soviet Union? What year is it?
If kamikaze drone Attack Can this ship survive?
A great Cold War Destroyer, they certainly get their money's worth out of now middle aged ships.
The one thing we all can give credit to the Russians is they know how to arm thier vehicles to the teeth.
Ты прав )
Yeah so when it catches a fire like most of their ships it makes for a great firework display
@_______ • 1000 years ago what???
Wow, what a warship! But does the Russian Navy have a Hammerhead Corvette!?
American ships: looks gorgeous
Russian ships: menacing, Intimidating, floating fortress 😳
Chinese ships: just a copycats, low quality
Yea I agree 🇺🇸💪💪💪
American ships looks like a barn on the boat.
I remember the "Hood" was the proud of the English Navy in the 40s ...... a floating fortress ..... for 4 Minutes. War - though technical impressive - is cruel shit! We´re all friends, we are one!
A beast of a ship.
the bigger they are, the bigger a target
The Russian Navy isn't a blue-water force. Even at its height in the mid 80's, the Soviet Navy wasn't blue-water either.
Lol. Russian boomers were even patroling near the US east and west coast during cold war. And even Russian frigates reached the waters of New Zealnd.
What ?? They had Cruisers, carriers and nuclear subs.
As expected, many people in the comments are unaware of Soviet naval doctrine. Geographically, Russia has extremely limited access to both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The Soviets knew it, accepted it, and effectively designed their navy around it. As opposed to power-projection like the US Navy, the Soviets geared their navy toward defending waters around the coast. That's not a blue-water strategy, nor is it a weak one; it's just more defensive.
@@metalmadsen "They had Cruisers, carriers and nuclear subs." Nearly all of which were relegated to defending the waters around the USSR.
@@Kwaj go search it up instead of bluffing
This tiny little russian navy with a few ships. Nothing to fear..... 😁
Arma russa são tão boas um cruzador só com tiro foi para o fundo do mar
this ship is damn heavyly arm
With lack of numbers it comes with power
If its Russian made its well made 👍
U mean like the Russian automobile 🚘? Lol. Just kidding . Russians have lots of cool gear.
@@bengreg2457 when it comes to war gear yes......automobiles I dont know.
Unreliable piles of junk....
yes, that's why every1 wants to buy Russian technolo... Oh. Wait. Stop it.
some Russian products are well made, some are not.
@@istvansipos9940 - "Everyone" (meaning poor countries with a small military budget) want to buy Russian tech because it's CHEAP! It's also garbage. Every major Soviet/Russian client state that had an armed conflict with a Western client state in the last 3 decades had their Soviet/Russian equipment utterly destroyed. Both Gulf wars and the wars between Egypt and Israel being prime examples.
Still a very capable and potent ship, but the biggest disadvantage would be that almost all modern warships have a reduced rcs (stealth) design.
Old but gold
Ồ tầu khu trục của Nga to dài ,có hỏa pháo,tên lửa mạnh hầy ,đánh được cả tầu ngầm là ok
1:50 水兵が半袖半ズボンだ！なんか始めてみた気がする。
How advanced do I think this ship is? Hardly at all. Still ten years out of date compared to Western navies.
30 years
The biggest disadvantage the Russians have is they are just a navy of one. All of their technology upgrades are developed in-house. The NATO countries integrate and share their advance technologies in their new ship design. Commercial western companies are competing to sell their advance equipment to NATO navies. You know how far behind the Russian technology is when they say their brand new sonar system; ”The Zvezda sonar system is considered by its designers to be the equivalent in terms of overall performance of the AN/SQS-53 on US destroyers…”, comparing it to an old US SONAR system and not being better. The US alone has 62 Arleigh Burke Class destroyers and 2 Zumwalt destroyers, plus the rest of the NATO countries with their modern destroyers. The other big disadvantage the Russians have, is they now are without strong allies like NATO on their side. The difference between NATO and the Russians, when NATO conducts large scale war games, they conduct their large scale war games with their allies. When the Russians have large scale war games, they play mostly by themselves or sometimes with the Chinese; it’s good to have friends
Well when you make a video that has a voice over reading a wiki page updated in 2009 you get what you get. Russian tech may not be as flashy nor costly but its still effective. No matter what you compare its the same old story. A Russian boot covers your foot, you can walk in it fight in it and it has rope laces lasts a long time. Great foot wear $20 a pair! A NATO boot has a carbon fiber arch support and an adjustable heel catch with kevlar stitch and ballistic nylon....you can walk in it you can fight in it and it costs $480 a pair........While this is not a factual example it illustrates the point.
@@TP-ie3hj rusian ship is always got sunk by us ship
@@adrianepenalosa8875 hmm🤔 ?
@@adrianepenalosa8875 Name a single time a Russia ship was sunk by a USN ship? Never took place. If however your argument is that the US with 700 billion a year budget is more powerful than a Russia and its 60 billion? Of course it is.
@@TP-ie3hj 20 rusian ship was sunk only by uss seawolf submarine during thats why soveit is already broke
Russian ships never stop 💪💪💪💪💪❤️
I could not see how the Udaloy class is more advanced than someone probably thought, as the video title suggested... It is a rather old design that is being modernised / upgraded with newer electronics and weapons, as in every other navy...
Так фрегат или эсминец? Разница есть.
6:19 - They have $50 desk chairs with wheels....on a combatant? LOL
The question is, could it track and shoot down a f35?
if s 200 can shoot sistem old 1960 can shoot stealth f 117 then can shoot and f 35
@@sasomilenkovski1376 Not sure about that one, f35 is miles ahead of all other aircraft, but maybe your right
She has a teeth that any ship will afraid to come near her
The real question is, how good are they at finding boomers?
Why does the sound the torpedo makes when hitting the water sound exactly like my ‘Number two 💩 when it splashed down in my toilet?
Beautiful ships!
1:05 what's a Russian destroyer doing in a US port.
Goodwill visit.
Thanks.
Dieser russische U-Boot-Zerstörer ist fortschrittlicher als Sie denken: dass ich nicht lache. 40-Jahre alte Technologie
Those frigets are older then me 😆
বাংলাদেশের সরকারের উচিত সাবমেরিন ডেসটযার তৈরির কারখানা জরুরী ভিত্তিতে তৈরি করার একান্ত দরকার।
cool rusty troughs)))
The Moskva has reached its final destination!
The bottom of the Black Sea!😀
قوة جبارة
Oh my gawd soo many armaments! Russian ship for a reason ....🔥🔥🔥🔥
Don't worry it will be in dry Dock most of the year with the rest of the fleet awaiting repairs.
😁😁😁💪
@pstanyer1 Propaganda 🤡
Sounds like the Royal Navy.
Ang Ganda Naman nito warships Ng russian ibibigay mo na Ito sa philipinas
Russian wars are not unleashed, they do not attack anyone, but they are able to end wars and fight back against any aggressor........
Youre comment is very very good guys we like it !
Goddamn, they should have just named the thing The Porcupine
Boa noite Deus abençoe sempre todos os aliados do Brazil o presidente da Rússia Vladimir puti e o presidente da china chixipin o presidente da Coreia do Norte kindioun da penicila Deus proteja todos os dias de guerra Deus pai criador do céu e da terra amém glória a Deus poderoso sempre 🙏🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 parabéns pelo seu dia abençoados
Очередная история про аналоГовнет!
با عرض سلام و خسته نباشید خدمت ادمین کانال میلیتاری
برنامه هایی که تولید میکنید عالیه اما تنها نقص برنامه ها تون دوبله نشدن برنامه هاتون به زبان شیرین فارسی هست
اگر برنامه هاتون به زبان شیرین فارسی دوبله بشوند عالی میشه
و دنبال کنندگان شما انشاالله چند برابر خواهند شد
pretty big for a frigate
Sya fdari indonesia dari dulu saya sangat suka dengan persenjataan rusia hebat
Please discribe about s 500
aku sendiri orang indo?
If you have to tell me it is more advanced than I think it isn't.
.The real point of a large aircraft carrier is to launch the The Northrop Grumman E-2 Hawkeye (Eye in the sky). Its radar our ranges any surface ship.
Its radar disk is much too large to put on and helicopter or vertical lift jet.
The US will alway see the other side first .
Even non-catapult carries can not launch them from a ramp deck.
A Russia ship will be detected hours before it detects a carrier group.
Меня всегда удивляло модернизированные БПК называют фрегатами , неее ну у нас
The word anti-submarine destroyer is funny, as all destroyers were originally called submarine destroyers.
I sink it everyone in cold waters. 1 Wired torpedo is all it takes from my sea wolf.
Way to go russia!! Keep the world safe from US and NATO..
🤣 so what if it's more advanced than we think, doesn't matter when you have ten times the amount of destroyers
Russia has weapons, we Czechoslovakians has rest and lowest uncomment rate in Europe :)
Kennen wir doch alles!
Adakah minat Indonesia membeli kapal perusak dari Rusia ini? Andai? Alangkah menakutkan. Asing ga ada yg berani walau cuma niat aja
Klingons on the STBD Bow
Просто сравните по ТТХ и вооружению с американскими эсминцами типа "Арли Берк". Это просто старье.
เห็นแล้วก้อยากได้บ้าง ทัพเรือไทย จัดมาสัก 3ลำก้พอ
O rachetă e mai avansată decât ai crede...
Mạnh nhất t2 luôn đấy
How can russia have such a big army navy and airforce with such less spending
ага..только их всего 2 и им почти по 50 лет))
6 в строю 2 на модернизации самому старому 40
@@sashan1975 Самостоятельной выйти в океан и там не утонуть могут только два)
@@Ving_Demon мне то не рассказывай сказки.
@@sashan1975 Это ты мне сказки не рассказывай
@@Ving_Demon ну расскажи, каким кораблям по 50 лет и какие из 6 штук не могут выйти в море.
Кораблям 40 лет. Чем они лучше?
Bravo Rusia
with light steam