The follow-up series to this video is available on Nebula exclusively! Check it out as a part of Curiositystream and Nebula's combined subscription curiositystream.com/featurehistory
@@jwb_666 No, he was 6 when Assassin's Creed came out in 2007. Therefore, he was born in around 2001, so he's probably about 20 now. Though, it looks like he was around 16 when the first video was uploaded to this channel.
@FlippyisFloppy me too when I heard 6 it hit me hard I was definitely 12 or so I just turned 26 but at least I knew the game and played it proper it was a good game none these young kids will know it unless they are luckily
„Whatever the lore says, I don’t know anymore“ is the most assassins creed thing ever said. Don’t get me wrong, Ac has to mix a believable world with a story that’s basically a conspiracy theory, but it’s a lot nowadays. I pity the guy who has to ensure the upcoming AC show is lore conforming and is now confronted with the task to understand what’s going on in the modern day storyline.
"Open up a history book for their next AAA blockbuster." I want a video game franchise where the whole premise is each entry in the series will be set in a different civil war. Doesn't matter the country or time period, just as long as the conflict can be considered a civil war. English Civil War, Spanish Civil War, Rome after Caesar was killed, Russian Civil War, Somalia, Yugoslav wars, anything.
I miss old assassins Creed so much back in the days when it was Just a guy with normal fighting abilities instead of magic powers (excluding eagle vision) and other RPG type bullshit
When playing older 3d games, more so open world ones: CAP YOUR FPS TO 60. Trust me every last glitch in this video was clearly a physics glitching out because old game engine can't handle the high hz world we now live in. I finally replayed the Witcher 3 after 6 years and hair and jewellery freaked out in every cutscene until i remember it hated over 60fps.
I'm gonna take an aside here is disagree on the story being crappy. at least when it come to the writing and character dialogue the philosophical discussions, especially during the memory corridor sequences and the intellectual debates between Desmond and Warren are amazing in how they relate to the fact that 2 people or groups can has vastly different views even if they agree on the premise for those views/actions
Second game really reduces the complexity into "good guys" and "bad guys" based on how "progressive" and "reactionary" devs thought they would be, adds an ancient civilization and pointless sci-fi elements while avoiding asking questions about power and philosophy. AS2 is good and probably more fun than AS1 but the writing gets so cliche
I agree Ac1 story is great it’s just short and maybe repetitive but that’s not the story fault it’s gameplay design, I kind of like it better since it’s non linear.
@@midge_gender_solek3314agreed, in AC1 all the targets, except one guy, thought they were doing the right thing. In AC2 if you watch the target videos, they just essentially say “this guy murders kittens, he burns down homes, and he steals candy from babies”
Desmond is not exactly just a white dude. I don't think we ever see his mother and his father was definitely white but he is sort of olive skin and is shown to have Native American and Middle-Eastern ancestors in the games.
At 3:03, Altair seems to stop his forward momentum and plummet like a rock. Assuming you are playing on PC, you are likely playing this on a higher than 60 FPS frame rate with VSYNC disabled. Classic AC games from AC1 to Revelations has a physics engine bug that will cause this behavior. For correct physics, limit FPS to 59 or 60 and turn on VSYNC in the in game menu. May also remedy the geometry bug causing Altair to die upon landing on haystack @feature history
@@StuartLynx AC is literally one of the easiest franchises ever. As in their games are super easy. The only game in the ENTIRE AC franchise that actually challenges your skill is AC Unity. That's ONE GAME in 12 MAIN GAMES. I literally mastered all AC games that I have played so far in the span of 2 days. Considering I took about 5 days to complete them.
@@Xeno574 honestly you're kind of right. That's why I find it so funny that people can't handle AC 1 like it's some sort of broken illogical game from 1997.
You beeing 6 years old when this came out has a lot to do with you not enjoying it beeing used to later standards. I remember so well when ac 1 released, it was truly remarkable and thought it was really fun! I played AC1 just some months ago and yes it was repetitive, but knowing this was a gamble that nobody knew the outcome of I think it was enjoyable.
I think some of it might be down to persona tastes too. I generally enjoy most open world single player games, so even though I've played a lot of those, I still enjoyed Assassin's Creed 1 a lot. For context, I'm actually younger that Feature History, being born in 2005. The voice lines by the preachers did get very tiring after a while though haha. Assassin's Creed 2 was just a straight up masterpiece in my eyes though.
The second game in the series is by far the best. Also because a lot of the assassinations and subject matter really did take place. Lorenzo de Medici is quoted in the game as saying he will erase his enemies and the pazzi family records as well as grave stones were destroyed adding to the historical ambiguity of the game. Also Lorenzo’s brother was assassinated and they got the details right down to where he was stabbed, how many times, and the quote Francesco was yelling
Just imagine an assassin creed way far in the future with JFK, Nixon, Khrushchev, Stalin, Mao Xedong, Thatcher, Churchill, and Tito all alive at the same time battling it out with espionage in an epic battle between the secret societies of the KGB, CIA, MI6, and MSS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey is the most historically accurate game ever made: Alcibiades bangs everything and everyone around. Therefore, 100% historically accurate
"Alcibiades bangs everything and everyone around. Therefore, 100% historically accurate" and sadly despite that wasnt half as fun as Origins. Still a good game and glad I bought it.
~4:54-5:02 No, you do not assassinate Ibn Jubayr, you Assassinate Jubair al Hakim, a fictional character presumably loosely inspired by Ibn Jubayr. He's in the same category as all the other fictional characters you didn't mention, he just shares his occupation and his first name with Ibn Jubayr's occupation and surname, respectively.
I mean, don't play those 1st few games and think it's total historically correct. In fact, if you wanna play the game just for historical accuracy alone, I suggest Origins. That game broke all barriers for what AC should have been all about and also ties back to real historical events and what-nots. Egyptian Civil War, Pompey being beheaded by Ptolemy because he was an idiot, Cleopatra meeting Caesar in a rolled up rag, Caesar falling in love with Cleopatra, Caesar visiting Alexander's tomb and declares his ambitions, the whole Alexandria library, the Siege of Alexandria, the drowning of Ptolemy AND the assassination of Caesar by Brutus and Cassius. ALL THIS, in the game. It's brutally effective and accurate. Plus, as Origins as Origins goes, its as stated in the game where you'll learn of the origins of the original "Assassins" aka "Brotherhood" aka "Hidden Ones" before it became what it was in Altair's rein.
This game requires very precise button skill, if you make a mistake it's not the game's fault. Also, try playing this game without HUD which is how it was meant to be played but PC edition has some investigation missions that can't be played without the HUD.
I like to think that all of the historical innacuracies of a series/movie/game is that it happened somewhat differently in another universe where they lived their lives different and ultimately become different caricatures of the person we knew and so whatever weird logic or action that person and the word made only exists in that world and not our original timeline
Jesus Christ, so you're 19? And already have a channel with half-a-million subs about history? God, what an I doing with my life... Great video by the way! Would love to see more videos of that type.
Historical inaccuracies is not the only AC's problem. The "good vs bad" is. I thank God I didn't even try their game about 20-s Russia 'cause I would cringe to death otherwise. They've had a potential though - idea of bad guys being not so bad or having questionable good as an alternative.
@Mia - Sᴇx Cʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ 18+🅥 I was at least 12 when the first game came out and much older when I actually payed it. And I'm actually fine with the first game and I absolutely agree with you on that one. Now the sequel(s) however is the issue. Telling me that templars are just some bad guys after about 8 to 20 hours of doubting whether am I (as assassin) a good guy is kinda retcon (cringe) IMO.
I didn't know much about the Crusades, and I liked AC1's story. I didn't know much about the Italian Renaissance or Ottoman history, and I liked the Ezio trilogy's story. I knew a lot about the American Revolution, and AC3 made it dawn on me that the whole series up to that point was just really bad ahistorical fanfiction masquerading as high art and my own ignorance of the previous eras muddled that realization.
@@hello11197 sure, but the earlier games gave the implicit pretext that they focused on historical realism as much as possible and that the assassinations were really the only part that took big creative liberties. Meanwhile, in reality the actual people are all hodgepodged together in actually impossible circumstances and radically changed ages, allegiances, and death years for many of them. Ahistorical works can be fun, the streaming series The Great is a good example of that as they don't even remotely pretend to be trying to tell a historically accurate story about Catherine the Great. But AC wore historical realism on its sleeve as a selling point to the level that they didn't want crossbows in the first game as they weren't a thing yet all the while radically altering the actual history in an extremely sloppy fashion. The stories basically relied upon player ignorance. When it got to a subject that you're familiar with, the ludicrousness of what was happening set off major wtf bells.
@@Terinije But AC didn't claim to be historically accurate. It claimed to be based on history, but it didn't wear historical accuracy on it's sleeve, it never even claimed to be accurate. You just made that part up.
@@Terinije None of the games focused on historical realism, stop making stuff up. They never said "this game is a 100% accurate documentary", they said that it's based on history, not how accurate it is. Stop making shit up and STFU.
Back at 2007 this game dominated the market and our fantasies. It was just perfect, the medieval era, the plot, the crusades, the scenery, everything! We should show some respect. We are judging the games by the year they were made , and not 15 years after their realese.
"Please don't hate us" sreen - that is accurate. Repetitive? Yes. Sometimes frustrating climbing? Yes. Seamless transitions between cutscenes and gameplay? Also, yes! Numero uno was really a unique game. With many historical and gameplay problems, it *was* immersive. The second one, arguably the best AC game, lost that seamlesness (while getting almost everything else in the gameplay right).
I've played all the main assassin's creed games since 2007 (I was 12 back then), and I've got say, the AC series is what actually got me really interested in history. Before this, I wasn't really interested in history. I guess I wouldn't be watching this channel today if I hadn't started playing AC 14 years ago.
Do I think the gameplay is good? No it actually pisses me off a lot. Do I think the story of the franchise is good? It's okay but it's a little rushed. Is it accurate? No, but it's called historical fiction for a reason, so I don't really care about that as much as other people. Do I still enjoy this franchise more than any other ones? Fuck yes. The very idea of it is enough for me to be into it
Hi. Want to note that UA-cam secretly removed my "bell notification" for your channel. Just want you to know that I really enjoy your videos hate UA-cam's such soft banning methods
you know another game that also does something like this is nioh, it takes actual history and makes it into some crazy shit, and by the end of it you've looked at some of the database entries and are now looking for wikipedia notes on the sengoku jidai.
No lie....it WAS because of AC 1 that I looked up what a "First Crusade" was in my freshman year in high school....then I saw something called a "People's Crusade", then this thing called "Inquisition" and then i started to learn about some chad named Edward the Black Prince and boy oh boy it was all off from there. I FUCKING HATE what Assassin's creed represents as a product and Ubisoft is one of the most disgusting developers out there. But i'd be lying if I didn't say I got something out of the experience.
Also what about the vision from the 'Apple of Eden'? Its the 12th century, a holographic globe appears and shows the modern borders of the USA and other states? Did the precursors form the exact same states with the exact same borders that exist today?
The follow-up series to this video is available on Nebula exclusively!
Check it out as a part of Curiositystream and Nebula's combined subscription
curiositystream.com/featurehistory
"being a 6 year old when it came out"
Still can't believe how young you were when you started this channel
Waiiiiiiiit waiiiiit waiiiit he was born in 2006? He's 14/5? What?
@@jwb_666 No, he was 6 when Assassin's Creed came out in 2007. Therefore, he was born in around 2001, so he's probably about 20 now. Though, it looks like he was around 16 when the first video was uploaded to this channel.
That's so weird! I'm about to be 21, I'm actually older than him! He sounds like he's in his mid 20's!!!
@@Baxtab13 He said in a video maybe a year or two ago he was like 17
@chimneyclimber I thought hr was in his 30's...
I'm 25, tf am I doing with my life?
“Being 6 years old when it came out”
...God I’m so old
I was a senior in high school when it came out crazy
@FlippyisFloppy me too when I heard 6 it hit me hard I was definitely 12 or so I just turned 26 but at least I knew the game and played it proper it was a good game none these young kids will know it unless they are luckily
I was 4, now 18 and finally graduated from highschool. Crazy
Wait, so you were born after 2000? Man I'm old.
Yup we’re old, lol.
I was born in the 1960’s so imagine how I feel :-)
@@patrickols oh, jeez, you're, like, ACTUALLY old
@@CharliMorganMusicdamn 😂
"being a 6 year old when it came out" - Wait what?
yeah his first video was like when he's still 15/16
„Whatever the lore says, I don’t know anymore“ is the most assassins creed thing ever said. Don’t get me wrong, Ac has to mix a believable world with a story that’s basically a conspiracy theory, but it’s a lot nowadays. I pity the guy who has to ensure the upcoming AC show is lore conforming and is now confronted with the task to understand what’s going on in the modern day storyline.
"Open up a history book for their next AAA blockbuster."
I want a video game franchise where the whole premise is each entry in the series will be set in a different civil war. Doesn't matter the country or time period, just as long as the conflict can be considered a civil war. English Civil War, Spanish Civil War, Rome after Caesar was killed, Russian Civil War, Somalia, Yugoslav wars, anything.
Love the idea.
Im being taught history by an infant. Ah, the wonders of the interwebs.
The first game came out in 2007, so he's at the very least 19 years old
@@Troyless as you get older you tend to view all people younger than 25 as infants basically
To all those born on or before 2000, yes, we're getting old.
I was born in 2002 that would mean I would be 4 or 5 when playing the game which I did play years later when I was much older.
I was born in 2002
Do i still get old?
Rubbing salt into the wound isn't helping helping
@@quinnholloway5400 Nah, not yet, once we hit our 30's, then it will start kinda (03)
@@iregreteverything360 ok thanks man
Pretty sure I made the exact disappointed noises while constantly not getting the exact jump
I miss old assassins Creed so much back in the days when it was Just a guy with normal fighting abilities instead of magic powers (excluding eagle vision) and other RPG type bullshit
This is brilliant
Brilliant
Brilliant
Brilliant
Brilliant
Nice, looking forward to this mini-series!
When playing older 3d games, more so open world ones: CAP YOUR FPS TO 60. Trust me every last glitch in this video was clearly a physics glitching out because old game engine can't handle the high hz world we now live in. I finally replayed the Witcher 3 after 6 years and hair and jewellery freaked out in every cutscene until i remember it hated over 60fps.
>he doesn't mention the Nine Degrees of wisdom in Nizari ismailism corresponding to the nine assassination targets
Altair: I'm the best assassin
Also altair: 2:34
Someone younger than me explaining the history of the first Assassin’s Creed to me is a new one. 😂
I'm gonna take an aside here is disagree on the story being crappy.
at least when it come to the writing and character dialogue the philosophical discussions, especially during the memory corridor sequences and the intellectual debates between Desmond and Warren are amazing in how they relate to the fact that 2 people or groups can has vastly different views even if they agree on the premise for those views/actions
Second game really reduces the complexity into "good guys" and "bad guys" based on how "progressive" and "reactionary" devs thought they would be, adds an ancient civilization and pointless sci-fi elements while avoiding asking questions about power and philosophy. AS2 is good and probably more fun than AS1 but the writing gets so cliche
I agree Ac1 story is great it’s just short and maybe repetitive but that’s not the story fault it’s gameplay design, I kind of like it better since it’s non linear.
@@midge_gender_solek3314agreed, in AC1 all the targets, except one guy, thought they were doing the right thing. In AC2 if you watch the target videos, they just essentially say “this guy murders kittens, he burns down homes, and he steals candy from babies”
Desmond is not exactly just a white dude. I don't think we ever see his mother and his father was definitely white but he is sort of olive skin and is shown to have Native American and Middle-Eastern ancestors in the games.
Only around 20 and already a big UA-cam channel. Nice work my man!
At 3:03, Altair seems to stop his forward momentum and plummet like a rock. Assuming you are playing on PC, you are likely playing this on a higher than 60 FPS frame rate with VSYNC disabled. Classic AC games from AC1 to Revelations has a physics engine bug that will cause this behavior. For correct physics, limit FPS to 59 or 60 and turn on VSYNC in the in game menu. May also remedy the geometry bug causing Altair to die upon landing on haystack @feature history
“brilliant brilliant brilliant brilliant brilliant brilliant brilliant brilliant brilliant brilliant”
can you delete these weird ass replies
@@jinglefart OMEGALUL
@@d.3521 send help
"I've spent the last 3 days subjugating myself to the gameplay of assassin creed"
Dear god man, why. Why punish yourself so.
Once you know how Assassin's Creed games work, it becomes more manageable
@@northchurch753 The first one did not age well at all. Everything in that game is designed to annoy you. They got much better starting from AC2.
Nah a lot of people say that but then you see them play and realize that they... Actually... Kinda...
Suck at it.
@@StuartLynx AC is literally one of the easiest franchises ever. As in their games are super easy. The only game in the ENTIRE AC franchise that actually challenges your skill is AC Unity. That's ONE GAME in 12 MAIN GAMES. I literally mastered all AC games that I have played so far in the span of 2 days. Considering I took about 5 days to complete them.
@@Xeno574 honestly you're kind of right.
That's why I find it so funny that people can't handle AC 1 like it's some sort of broken illogical game from 1997.
The nostalgia when i saw altair in that room with malik hit reaally haard maan !
@hatsune minecraft Don’t worry about those “runes”, it is just him remembering his lineage of electricians.
@hatsune minecraft he's just honoring the electricians in his family
You beeing 6 years old when this came out has a lot to do with you not enjoying it beeing used to later standards. I remember so well when ac 1 released, it was truly remarkable and thought it was really fun!
I played AC1 just some months ago and yes it was repetitive, but knowing this was a gamble that nobody knew the outcome of I think it was enjoyable.
Even alot of the Ezio trilogy is getting a bit 'stiff' in gameplay comparatively. Still enjoyable, but definitely product of its time XD
I have the same feeling playing the early Tomb Raider games. They're considered outstanding games but all I feel while playing them is jank.
I think some of it might be down to persona tastes too. I generally enjoy most open world single player games, so even though I've played a lot of those, I still enjoyed Assassin's Creed 1 a lot. For context, I'm actually younger that Feature History, being born in 2005. The voice lines by the preachers did get very tiring after a while though haha. Assassin's Creed 2 was just a straight up masterpiece in my eyes though.
I was only 3 years old when it was released and I went back and loved it, but I like older games better than new age crap.
Do more historical video game breakdowns. I really liked it.
The second game in the series is by far the best. Also because a lot of the assassinations and subject matter really did take place. Lorenzo de Medici is quoted in the game as saying he will erase his enemies and the pazzi family records as well as grave stones were destroyed adding to the historical ambiguity of the game. Also Lorenzo’s brother was assassinated and they got the details right down to where he was stabbed, how many times, and the quote Francesco was yelling
A much appreciated soon to be series. Will be interesting to see the later games covered.
wait, the graphics are way better than i remembered them to be wtf
I can already tell this is going to be a brilliant video
Pardon the pun.😁
Just imagine an assassin creed way far in the future with JFK, Nixon, Khrushchev, Stalin, Mao Xedong, Thatcher, Churchill, and Tito all alive at the same time battling it out with espionage in an epic battle between the secret societies of the KGB, CIA, MI6, and MSS
I would love to actually see this I wanted a video on this for so long
Finding out I’m basically the same age as Feature History* has kind of made my day I won’t lie
*corrected because I’m dumb
This isn't the internet historian.......
@@MasonBryant yeah that was a mistake on my part lmao, cheers for the spot
@@starguy321 He started this show when he was 16
Assassin's Creed Odyssey is the most historically accurate game ever made: Alcibiades bangs everything and everyone around. Therefore, 100% historically accurate
"Alcibiades bangs everything and everyone around. Therefore, 100% historically accurate"
and sadly despite that wasnt half as fun as Origins. Still a good game and glad I bought it.
"I thought it was fun until I played it" man I love that game.
people too often forget the database entries in the assassins creed games that give some history mixed with a bit of fiction
I never clicked so fast on a video before. Like finding loot in a game.
When I replayed the game, I got stuck behind a wall twice when I was trying to get back to the Bureau after assassinating a target
It’s been a while since I’ve watched this channel but this is the first thing I see after playing origins
~4:54-5:02 No, you do not assassinate Ibn Jubayr, you Assassinate Jubair al Hakim, a fictional character presumably loosely inspired by Ibn Jubayr. He's in the same category as all the other fictional characters you didn't mention, he just shares his occupation and his first name with Ibn Jubayr's occupation and surname, respectively.
I mean, don't play those 1st few games and think it's total historically correct. In fact, if you wanna play the game just for historical accuracy alone, I suggest Origins.
That game broke all barriers for what AC should have been all about and also ties back to real historical events and what-nots. Egyptian Civil War, Pompey being beheaded by Ptolemy because he was an idiot, Cleopatra meeting Caesar in a rolled up rag, Caesar falling in love with Cleopatra, Caesar visiting Alexander's tomb and declares his ambitions, the whole Alexandria library, the Siege of Alexandria, the drowning of Ptolemy AND the assassination of Caesar by Brutus and Cassius.
ALL THIS, in the game. It's brutally effective and accurate. Plus, as Origins as Origins goes, its as stated in the game where you'll learn of the origins of the original "Assassins" aka "Brotherhood" aka "Hidden Ones" before it became what it was in Altair's rein.
This game requires very precise button skill, if you make a mistake it's not the game's fault.
Also, try playing this game without HUD which is how it was meant to be played but PC edition has some investigation missions that can't be played without the HUD.
@Mia - Sᴇx Cʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ 18+🅥 Why tf are you replying to me? Why do you have so many alt accounts? What is wrong with you?
@Rita 25 y.o - check my vidéó Stop spamming with your alt accounts, you incel.
I love this channel it’s like Samonella academy but in more detail and mostly about history
That's exactly what a templar would say...
I like to think that all of the historical innacuracies of a series/movie/game is that it happened somewhat differently in another universe where they lived their lives different and ultimately become different caricatures of the person we knew and so whatever weird logic or action that person and the word made only exists in that world and not our original timeline
Man really called me out at the start of the sponsor message 👀
I’m the same age as u, I love history like u, I’m studying history in college but u r more talented than most ppl our age n me. Hope u doing good
Nice video gamer, been subbed since we where 15
You're back!
Considering how unhistorical AC3 was I was very surprised at how similar to the source material Black Flag was.
Remember when assassins creed let you play as an assassin? Good times
Jesus Christ, so you're 19? And already have a channel with half-a-million subs about history? God, what an I doing with my life... Great video by the way! Would love to see more videos of that type.
This is great, I’d love to see more of this sort of thing!
this dude 19 years old
Historical inaccuracies is not the only AC's problem. The "good vs bad" is. I thank God I didn't even try their game about 20-s Russia 'cause I would cringe to death otherwise.
They've had a potential though - idea of bad guys being not so bad or having questionable good as an alternative.
An amazing piece of criticism left for future generations!
@Mia - Sᴇx Cʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ 18+🅥 I was at least 12 when the first game came out and much older when I actually payed it. And I'm actually fine with the first game and I absolutely agree with you on that one.
Now the sequel(s) however is the issue. Telling me that templars are just some bad guys after about 8 to 20 hours of doubting whether am I (as assassin) a good guy is kinda retcon (cringe) IMO.
@Mia - Sᴇx Cʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ 18+🅥 Nah don't listen to this whiny boy.
Rants about the game butchering history while simultaneously butchering Salahuddin's name
LOL
Ohh how I love the lenght of 9:11
Dude I remember Al’s it breaking my controller over the parkour system, might just replay this to redeem mysef
I didn't know much about the Crusades, and I liked AC1's story.
I didn't know much about the Italian Renaissance or Ottoman history, and I liked the Ezio trilogy's story.
I knew a lot about the American Revolution, and AC3 made it dawn on me that the whole series up to that point was just really bad ahistorical fanfiction masquerading as high art and my own ignorance of the previous eras muddled that realization.
I can’t wait until your next update when you realise it doesn’t remotely matter how historically accurate it is. It’s not a documentary.
@@hello11197 sure, but the earlier games gave the implicit pretext that they focused on historical realism as much as possible and that the assassinations were really the only part that took big creative liberties. Meanwhile, in reality the actual people are all hodgepodged together in actually impossible circumstances and radically changed ages, allegiances, and death years for many of them.
Ahistorical works can be fun, the streaming series The Great is a good example of that as they don't even remotely pretend to be trying to tell a historically accurate story about Catherine the Great. But AC wore historical realism on its sleeve as a selling point to the level that they didn't want crossbows in the first game as they weren't a thing yet all the while radically altering the actual history in an extremely sloppy fashion.
The stories basically relied upon player ignorance. When it got to a subject that you're familiar with, the ludicrousness of what was happening set off major wtf bells.
@@Terinije But AC didn't claim to be historically accurate. It claimed to be based on history, but it didn't wear historical accuracy on it's sleeve, it never even claimed to be accurate. You just made that part up.
@@Terinije AC never claimed to be realistic.
@@Terinije None of the games focused on historical realism, stop making stuff up.
They never said "this game is a 100% accurate documentary", they said that it's based on history, not how accurate it is. Stop making shit up and STFU.
If the American Revolution has taught me anything, is that they are so badass that they made us a new Nation :D
6 years old when it came out?? Holy shit I am old
@Jessica💋 Sweety Hotgirl - Vlogs I was quoting him. I wasn't 6 when the game came out
Back at 2007 this game dominated the market and our fantasies. It was just perfect, the medieval era, the plot, the crusades, the scenery, everything! We should show some respect. We are judging the games by the year they were made , and not 15 years after their realese.
Altair: I'm the best assassin
Also altair: 2:34
"Please don't hate us" sreen - that is accurate.
Repetitive? Yes.
Sometimes frustrating climbing? Yes.
Seamless transitions between cutscenes and gameplay? Also, yes!
Numero uno was really a unique game. With many historical and gameplay problems, it *was* immersive. The second one, arguably the best AC game, lost that seamlesness (while getting almost everything else in the gameplay right).
I've played all the main assassin's creed games since 2007 (I was 12 back then), and I've got say, the AC series is what actually got me really interested in history. Before this, I wasn't really interested in history. I guess I wouldn't be watching this channel today if I hadn't started playing AC 14 years ago.
Do I think the gameplay is good? No it actually pisses me off a lot. Do I think the story of the franchise is good? It's okay but it's a little rushed. Is it accurate? No, but it's called historical fiction for a reason, so I don't really care about that as much as other people. Do I still enjoy this franchise more than any other ones? Fuck yes. The very idea of it is enough for me to be into it
WHERE ARE YOU AT BRO I AM WAITING FOR YOUR NEXT VIDEO!!!!!
Glad to see I'm not the only one made to feel old here O.O
You better make this a series
Assassin's Creed's main problem is the unrealistic jumping and only fighting one man at a time
This is a dope video concept.
Feeling a bit weird watching a video game video instead of the usual history. Good thing I’m a gamer myself
This game and horrible histories is what got me really interested in history
Wikipedia…. WIKIPEDIA ??????
tut tut tut tut tut
Hi. Want to note that UA-cam secretly removed my "bell notification" for your channel. Just want you to know that I really enjoy your videos hate UA-cam's such soft banning methods
Yay new vid
So we all agree that assassins creed is 100% accurate
No.
Holy crap, you were 6 when this came out? I was 7! You're younger than me?!?!?!
You’re his senpai.
Didn't feel old till dude says he was 6 when assassins creed came out.
you know another game that also does something like this is nioh, it takes actual history and makes it into some crazy shit, and by the end of it you've looked at some of the database entries and are now looking for wikipedia notes on the sengoku jidai.
Bro you were 6 in 2007 too? Based fellow 2001 gang member
Gotta love that Dervish dancing tho)
Props to the pronunciations throughout the video
You got the etymology ass-backwards. The word is assassin because they were known as hashashin. Not the other way around.
I liked this idea a lot keep it up
I have a feeling AC1 will get a remastered.
I wasted way more than 3 days playing assassin's creed...
Black flag was super fun
Wait til he hears about kingdom come deliverance
Woah woah woah, Feature History guy is only around 20 years old??
The most realistic moment in AC history: 2:24.
So you mean that AssCreed is the Sigmund Freud of the historical gaming world?
Yeah guys don't be like him, played Assassin's Creed for 3 days
Play it for 14 years
Very cool idea
_Please make episode on second Boer war_
Loving the Chungus Among Us
No lie....it WAS because of AC 1 that I looked up what a "First Crusade" was in my freshman year in high school....then I saw something called a "People's Crusade", then this thing called "Inquisition" and then i started to learn about some chad named Edward the Black Prince and boy oh boy it was all off from there.
I FUCKING HATE what Assassin's creed represents as a product and Ubisoft is one of the most disgusting developers out there. But i'd be lying if I didn't say I got something out of the experience.
Also what about the vision from the 'Apple of Eden'? Its the 12th century, a holographic globe appears and shows the modern borders of the USA and other states? Did the precursors form the exact same states with the exact same borders that exist today?
I very much agree with this video
the name Altair bin laahad literally means bird son of no one in arabic
The bird, son of no ome?