I got this as a backup to my NanoFlare 700 and also for my wife to use, and at the price point I couldn’t beat it here in the US. There is no way I would consider it head heavy, I think as we move to 4U, 5U, etc towards lighter rackets and still able to get the power we need I think we need to adjust what the balance point should be. It seems to be to maintain headlight status as we get lighter and lighter, the numbers need to change. Such as NanoFlare 700 or 800/800LT, the balance points for the 5u vs 4u isn’t the same, but I would argue they have more similar feel. This is a phenomenally easy racket to play, I thought I wouldn’t like it since I actually normally prefer head heavy rackets, but I loved the speed I got from the NanoFlare 700 and never wanted for power. This felt the same, it was so much lighter than my 4u 700, that I felt like I could always produce more speed to compensate for the lightness. It is also very forgiving. TH only thing I wish is they would include VDM in more rackets, like their tennis rackets.
As beginner. Got my eyes on nanoflare 170 for my first light weight racket. On my average budget, probably have to skip n270. But seems like I should try Abroz Venom instead for better racket than this and price wise. Though seems like the n170 has better durability. Do advise. Tysm
@@badmintonracketreview2814 Appreciate the replied! After going around back and forth throughout your vids for lightweight rackets, seems like I'll going to settle down with hammerhead. Venom is very tempting but seems like hammerhead is more forgivable for beginner like me. Do tell your opinion about my pick or should I stay with venom recommendation afterall instead. Though it absolutely amazing to get some other recommendation rackets about the same price as them. Something light and small grip (not sure if possible since my hand very small). I still getting use to be all round and I do love to smash. Much grateful!
Hello sir. I need a light racket but with good repulsion and some "oomph" in shots, if you know what i mean, because i have a weak arm (injuries). Is this racket a good choice???
Can you also add some fragility test? We play doubles and mostly hit each others racquet so before buying a racquet someone love to hear about fragility of a racquet.
Hello sir, which you recommend, nanoray11/nanoflare170/nanoflare270, i didn't has strong power (short forehand/backhand clear) and usually plays double on the front, thanks 😁
I'm a beginner looking for a lightweight racket, all rounded performance, and better smash which to choose? Astrox Smash, Nanoflare 160fx, nanoflare 170 light
I am somewhat between intermediate and advanced player. Can you please recommend which nanflare shall I choose for doubles and occasional singles play.
nope this racket can't handle tension more than 26lbs it will start to wobble and probably break after a smash. I would personally recommend to have it strung at 25lbs only. with the main strings at 23 and cross at 25. very good racket though
Lols i would do the main strings at 27lbs and the crosses at 30lbs as a maximum, not sure i would be confident to go over that. Remember Yonex will not honor the warranty if you go over the recommended string tension.
NF 170 much easier to use, the FB lightning fast, but small sweet spot and harder to get timing right with. For intermediate or below i would say NF 170
I got this as a backup to my NanoFlare 700 and also for my wife to use, and at the price point I couldn’t beat it here in the US. There is no way I would consider it head heavy, I think as we move to 4U, 5U, etc towards lighter rackets and still able to get the power we need I think we need to adjust what the balance point should be. It seems to be to maintain headlight status as we get lighter and lighter, the numbers need to change. Such as NanoFlare 700 or 800/800LT, the balance points for the 5u vs 4u isn’t the same, but I would argue they have more similar feel.
This is a phenomenally easy racket to play, I thought I wouldn’t like it since I actually normally prefer head heavy rackets, but I loved the speed I got from the NanoFlare 700 and never wanted for power. This felt the same, it was so much lighter than my 4u 700, that I felt like I could always produce more speed to compensate for the lightness. It is also very forgiving. TH only thing I wish is they would include VDM in more rackets, like their tennis rackets.
As beginner. Got my eyes on nanoflare 170 for my first light weight racket. On my average budget, probably have to skip n270. But seems like I should try Abroz Venom instead for better racket than this and price wise. Though seems like the n170 has better durability. Do advise. Tysm
I would say the Venom is way better and has great durability
@@badmintonracketreview2814 Appreciate the replied! After going around back and forth throughout your vids for lightweight rackets, seems like I'll going to settle down with hammerhead. Venom is very tempting but seems like hammerhead is more forgivable for beginner like me. Do tell your opinion about my pick or should I stay with venom recommendation afterall instead.
Though it absolutely amazing to get some other recommendation rackets about the same price as them. Something light and small grip (not sure if possible since my hand very small). I still getting use to be all round and I do love to smash. Much grateful!
@@farahhanim3340 this is a very good racket, my friend ijaz bai uses this and he's a very good and powerful player with big smashes
Hello sir. I need a light racket but with good repulsion and some "oomph" in shots, if you know what i mean, because i have a weak arm (injuries). Is this racket a good choice???
Yes it is or try the 270 even better!
Can you also add some fragility test? We play doubles and mostly hit each others racquet so before buying a racquet someone love to hear about fragility of a racquet.
Would be hard to test for fragility on all rackets, would lead to a lot of broken or damaged rackets
Hello why don't you do a give away of one of your badminton rackets that would be great , but its up to you mate
Good Idea, we will organise this
Yeaaaah can't wait
Sir can you review the nanoray light 9i for me thank you very much
Please review Nanoflare 200 light blue and Victor Thruster K HMR L.
They new?
@@badmintonracketreview2814 no... Don't think so... Both felt great in the hands but your opinion n review will help in the decision...
@@imataquito005 the reviews we are releasing we tested in October 2020. The next session will be in April/May this year
@@badmintonracketreview2814 awesome... hope you guys could include those two racquets. 😁
ASTROX FB OR ASTROX SMASH please tell... ITS URGENT.... PLS...PLS........PLS ..........
Smash
Hello sir, which you recommend, nanoray11/nanoflare170/nanoflare270, i didn't has strong power (short forehand/backhand clear) and usually plays double on the front, thanks 😁
Try the N270
I'm a beginner looking for a lightweight racket, all rounded performance, and better smash which to choose? Astrox Smash, Nanoflare 160fx, nanoflare 170 light
I am somewhat between intermediate and advanced player. Can you please recommend which nanflare shall I choose for doubles and occasional singles play.
N800 should work well for you
Please review Nanoflare 33is Light
Its on the E-zone now - take a look
Please do review of carbonex 8000 plus.
Do you have made a video of Yonex nanoaray speed?
Don't think so
@@badmintonracketreview2814 what is your opinion about nanoray speed, actually i like the name. but what about the performance?
Sir, can NF170 strung tension until 28 lbs..?
26lbs max
should i go with nanoflare 160 or 270 speed? im beginner
nope this racket can't handle tension more than 26lbs it will start to wobble and probably break after a smash. I would personally recommend to have it strung at 25lbs only. with the main strings at 23 and cross at 25. very good racket though
Astrox 22 or NF 170 ? Pls help
Very Different to play with - i would say the N270 is easier work
Nanoflare 170 vs Astrox 39?
The Ezone is now free for access, please sign in and use the compare tool - badmintonracketreview.com/intro/ Please subscribe to You tube too
Pulled 30 safe?
Lols i would do the main strings at 27lbs and the crosses at 30lbs as a maximum, not sure i would be confident to go over that. Remember Yonex will not honor the warranty if you go over the recommended string tension.
Bro, what manual pull is digital?
We use digital pull
can this racket used for smash power?
No. Only for speed. Not for smashing. Head heavy rackets are good for smashing
Astrox FB or Nanoflare 170 light for doubles?
NF 170 much easier to use, the FB lightning fast, but small sweet spot and harder to get timing right with. For intermediate or below i would say NF 170
astrox flash boost
Sir, can Nanoflare 170 light stringed until 28 lbs..?
Not officially, 26lbs is the max. However loads of players do string higher at their own risk, many without any issues.
Oke thanks your info
Arcsaber 15i or nanoflare 170 light?
Arc 15i
@@badmintonracketreview2814 i have Arc 15i good for defense, but nanoflare 170 light next to try