Check out the Store: www.longshotstore.com/ Join the Discord channel: discord.gg/drNE6bT Hey guys. In this DCS World Simulator video Growling Sidewinder and I protecting our base from incoming SEAD strike. Thanks to GS for the help, Hope you guys enjoy!
Sadly in real life, the tanker crew would not get out as there are no ejection seats. You would have to fight against the Gs of the spinning plane, pull a jettison handle on the ceiling and then go out through the main entry hatch.
@@SVSky Back in the day, we carried 7 chutes and survival kits all of the time. When they were flying combat missions they wore the chutes. We used to wear chutes doing air refueling even further back. They took them off of the airplane for regular use just before I retired in 2005. I believe they deactivated the escape spoiler as well.
Exactly what the 29 was created for ..... short point blank defence ! But I would take an ET as well as the 77's just for the tanker or to surprise those 16's with a nasty silent shot :) Well done , great vid . If they are very close the vertical scan is a powerful tool instead of looking for them by scanning .
I've been trying to convince GS to play an Apache vs Ka-50 duel, in an environment with tall buildings, so that there can be peek and shoot. Also, a couple of shorads on each side to make things more interesting. Would you discuss it with him?
Great video Longshot, however I wonder how this would have turned out if you were fighting your clones and they were in the F-16s? I still feel in BVR the F-15 and F-16 have the upper hand on the Mig 29....I have been known to be wrong though...lol
Oh, Come ON! One missile catches all four engines on fire? .... Also, I'd like you guys to play this game flying the F-16s, and see if the MiG's shoot down everything.
Looks like those F-16's didn't have air cover support while conducting the ground attack or were too focused on the ground attack itself. Perhaps it may have played out differently. That's just my two cents. Great video and editing as always. It would interesting to do the mission again on the opposite side with air cover support.
OOOFF ! That's gotta hurt, all those F-16's down. You can guarantee this wouldn't be reported on CNN as " we just got our asses kicked by Syria" lol You guys works so well together I watch both your channels
You guys were good until you showed the crew bailing out of the tanker. With the way it was spinning no one would have gotten out. You have to freefall from the crew entry hatch to get out of a 135. Not to mention that it would have shed it's wings on the first roll.
İn real life there would be support jets for the ones which are on the SEAD mission. And as soon as they launch the HARM missiles they wouldn't be on high altitude like a sitting duck.
Your objective shows why I put such a high focus on the concept of a High Value Asset escort. One with a range to match the AWACS and Tankers endurance. One of them I designed is called the Northop Grumman F-47 Thundershadow. It got that name because I don't think "Thunderbolt III" would make sense with the A-10 still being in service.
Check out the Store: www.longshotstore.com/
Join the Discord channel: discord.gg/drNE6bT
Hey guys. In this DCS World Simulator video Growling Sidewinder and I protecting our base from incoming SEAD strike. Thanks to GS for the help, Hope you guys enjoy!
Sadly in real life, the tanker crew would not get out as there are no ejection seats. You would have to fight against the Gs of the spinning plane, pull a jettison handle on the ceiling and then go out through the main entry hatch.
I was going to say, the -135 chutes popped fast. I don't think I've ever seen a -135 crew wear chutes.
@@SVSky Back in the day, we carried 7 chutes and survival kits all of the time. When they were flying combat missions they wore the chutes. We used to wear chutes doing air refueling even further back. They took them off of the airplane for regular use just before I retired in 2005. I believe they deactivated the escape spoiler as well.
@@beverlychmelik5504why did they do that?
@@pastlast158 Weight savings, and wear and tear and to be honest, other than a controlled bailout, your chances of getting out are slim.
In real life tankers would not fly so close to the enemy controlled airspace. MiG-29 wouldn't have enough range to chase enemy tanker.
Exactly what the 29 was created for ..... short point blank defence ! But I would take an ET as well as the 77's just for the tanker or to surprise those 16's with a nasty silent shot :) Well done , great vid . If they are very close the vertical scan is a powerful tool instead of looking for them by scanning .
MiG-29 is such an amazing aircraft! I'm really enjoying the colours in your videos, I assume you're using reshade? Would you mind sharing your preset?
Great to see you guys back together again! Please keep collaborating.
Did the F16’s fire a single A/ A missile between them?
Does not look like it, then again DCS is fantasy
Seems a lil fishy to me also
Bc when sidewinder do that,,, you noticed it's true fight..
@@DaniHaldar-qk5zg 🤡
The enemy did not fire a single amraam or had any escort fighter?
Plot Armor for the MiG-29s
Right? Worst Western pilots ever, lol
they went for an easy win scenario .. pretty lame mission
I've been trying to convince GS to play an Apache vs Ka-50 duel, in an environment with tall buildings, so that there can be peek and shoot. Also, a couple of shorads on each side to make things more interesting. Would you discuss it with him?
Gerat video every time you and GS getting together it's more fun. Thanks ❤
Great video Longshot, however I wonder how this would have turned out if you were fighting your clones and they were in the F-16s? I still feel in BVR the F-15 and F-16 have the upper hand on the Mig 29....I have been known to be wrong though...lol
No amraam fired at those ranges? Had those pilots just graduated from a cessna 152 and forced into an F16?
Looks like the SEAD mission was successful at any rate. I wonder why the 16's didn't have any overwatch against you?
That was one of your cooler videos, I like the realistic scenarios from smaller airforces
Great content, loving your videos, very good fights!
It was a ..turkey shoot !
Oh, Come ON! One missile catches all four engines on fire? .... Also, I'd like you guys to play this game flying the F-16s, and see if the MiG's shoot down everything.
I love your content man thanks for the vid
Thanks!
😄 The chuckling about the tanker making a big boom. Haha Thanks for the upload LS!!!
Hi I’m from Saudi Arabia I like you channel, I’m happy you watch channel❤️❤️❤️
Did the F-16s forget to bring missiles? Lol
Looks like those F-16's didn't have air cover support while conducting the ground attack or were too focused on the ground attack itself. Perhaps it may have played out differently. That's just my two cents.
Great video and editing as always. It would interesting to do the mission again on the opposite side with air cover support.
Finally a Mig 29 video by LongShot ❤
Did the NATO radars quit working?
OOOFF ! That's gotta hurt, all those F-16's down. You can guarantee this wouldn't be reported on CNN as " we just got our asses kicked by Syria" lol
You guys works so well together I watch both your channels
you and GS are absolute madlads
This just shows how capable the mig 29 is.
or how stupid the DCS AI is....
@@echodelta2172bc,,,your sidewinder channel AI also stupid... and your Western propoganda...
@@DaniHaldar-qk5zg 🤡
Are you fighting AI in these fights? Because i have to imagine they'd atleast shoot back at you ya know? Lol 🌻
They are fighting AI, this was done using the mission editor in DCS.
Imagine if the Iraqis had you two as pilots during OIF. Phew, happy you're on our side.
Excellent quality of video - keep up the great work 👍
I also enjoy the less-moronic partnership - nice vid, LS.👋
YEAY! Another vid with GS!
Two of my favorite digi flyers doing a thing, ❤ing life! By the way, we need more idiot vids guys!!😅 Peace.
Love your workmanship!
Very enjoyable video, thanks!
Can you add this mission file in the description maybe?
When I share missions It's in my Discord. I'll post it there
@@LongShotChannel I'm in your discord thanks man
Our fighters have the ability to train in simulaters time and time again! Well before they fly them.
8:42 Hmm hmm. 😅 great video!
great action but a little better editing from the missile/target point of view is needed. still great stuff though
i love these mission vids with two players
You guys were good until you showed the crew bailing out of the tanker. With the way it was spinning no one would have gotten out. You have to freefall from the crew entry hatch to get out of a 135. Not to mention that it would have shed it's wings on the first roll.
İn real life there would be support jets for the ones which are on the SEAD mission. And as soon as they launch the HARM missiles they wouldn't be on high altitude like a sitting duck.
Your objective shows why I put such a high focus on the concept of a High Value Asset escort. One with a range to match the AWACS and Tankers endurance. One of them I designed is called the Northop Grumman F-47 Thundershadow. It got that name because I don't think "Thunderbolt III" would make sense with the A-10 still being in service.
"High Value Asset Escort"
That's called literally any fighter.
3:20 which missile is used?
what are your reahade profile?
Those mig29s look so sexy in formation.
45 years of MiG-29 in 2022
What is the airbase name?
Formidable Pair of aces
F-16 Turkish?
Великолепно! Красавчики.
IRL you guys would not have gotten off the ground... And if you did you would most likely get splashed as you got off the ground