Drawbacks vs D7200: · Just one SD card slot · Can't use vertical grip · No magnesium alloy chasis · No index ring (can't use AI/AI-S lenses) · Lower resolution LCD This is not a D7500, this is a D5700!!!
I got the 7500, works great, way better than the 7200. This is not a pro camera, but a good photographer can make it work like a pro camera, don`t focus on gear, more on technique.
I think the D7500 is going to be good for D7200 and D500 sales. people who have been holding off purchasing a D7200 until its replacement is announced will go ahead and grab the cheaper and better D7200. people like myself who have held off a D500 purchase incase the D7200 replacement was amazing now realize that its not even close so we'll just go ahead and buy the D500. Who will buy the D7500? People who don't already own a DSLR and shop at Best Buy.
Exactly! I'll be waiting till the end of the year to pick up a D7200 to replace my D7100 with it's way too small buffer...can't believe that we've had to wait this long only to be disappointed in the end...
Theytoldmetodoit1 I've had my D7100 for a couple years now and wanted to skip the D7200 to look into the one there after... or go full frame. Now it looks like I'll be sticking with the D7100 or going full frame.
For me the upgrade would be the D500. Am very happy with the D7200 too though. And as Angry points out, the D7500 has no support for AI lenses - oops. That means there are currently manufactured lenses Nikon produce that will not work on your new Nikon D7500 DSLR. I think the single card slot is a retrograde step and it is not even XQD. Plus, the two things they could have ditched from the D7200 remain - the annoying stacked dials with child-proof buttons and the poor viewfinder. This is an odd "progression" in the Nikon line-up
The D7500 is not a D7200 replacement/Upgrade. Everybody is cracking a rib about the specs. There are lots of people who does not carry the budget to buy a D500 but who shoot a bit of school sports, birds, wildlife and some video. This is not aimed at the pro market!!!! Pro Level we have D5/D810, "pro DX" we have D500/D7200 and mid range DX we have D7500/D5600. So a sport/wildlife camera and a general purpose camera in the different categories. Speaking to a well know retailer who service the wildlife/Nature/Sport shooters. They have young people, students, low budget wildlife/bird shooters who grab this camera. So well done Matt. At least one reviewer who see this camera for what it is. A action/sport camera for the consumer market who is very happy..
Matt, Thanks for the review. I shoot with a D7200, and really like it. The two cards and the battery life are really important. The lighter weight of the D7500 would be nice, but is not worth the loss of the other features. Thanks again
also the loss of the magnesium alloy body... two months ago i was comparing cameras for which i should buy and in the end it was either the d7500 or d7200, i still chose the d7200 because the build quality for me was more important than those few better specs
I've bought the D500 last week and got a bit worried after the first rumors about the D7500 popped up on Reddit, but after seeing the specs of the D7500, I definitely made the right choice.
My wife just purchased the D7200 over the d7500 for some of the reasons you stated. She has been to photography school and wondered away from it. Now getting back to it she wanted a pro model unfortunately we can't afford one. She settled on the 7200 for the dual sd slot. And slightly higher MP. Pretty sure she made the right choice. She got some amazing shots at an airshow. Some beautiful sunset shots at the beach. She loves it. Now i wish i could take photos half as good as hers. Love the 7200.
I have the D7100 and I will stick with it. The D7500 not only has just one single card slot, there's also missing the support for Ai and Ai-S lenses. And when you look underneath the camera, the support for battery grips seems to be missing as well. Is that confimed?
Recall the middle of Nikon's DX line started with D70 that was build with many of the same construction features and followed on through the D90. Then things changed when the D7000 came out with more metal build, dual slots and the feeler. The D300 never got replaced until the D500 finally came out. So its back to like it was when the D200 was introduced and followed by the D80 same sensor processor much less body features. So its back to to 2005.
I have aD7500 and it fits my needs very well. Upgrade from D5300. Tracking, focusing, speed well worth the upgrade. Saved $700Cdn.during the May Nikon sale. Most drawbacks mentioned in comments are insignificant for me.
Hi Matt.....There's also no in body focusing motor, the battery has 15% less capacity BTW. LCD resolution is 980K dots(approx.) The one card slot should be an imprisonable offence!
Thanks Matt, I have the D5100 and currently use the 18-140mm lens rather than kit. However, I'm considering the next upgrade and going full frame, probably the D750 replacement. However, a bit of me is thinking of the D500 and staying with crop. I've read some articles (e.g. from Tony and Chelsea) who say that full frame lens such as the 70-200 2.8 are not as sharp on crop cameras. If that is true then what are the professional DX lens? Have you done a video on using FX lens on DX Bodies, or really, does it not make any difference?
Well Matt I think that force is not strong anymore in Nikon's family. I started to shoot with Nikon's gear 1989. That time I have transferred from Canon. Why? Mainly because I was spoiled kid. BUT...the first Nikon I took (F3HP) gave me the feeling that i hold something special, reliable, useful. That was the way all brands use to practice. And almost all cameras from that time proved their quality. Many of them are still performing strong even these day. Manufacturers used to listen customers. Present time: No acknowledged feedback between manufacturers and customers a.k.a. buyers. So that question 'Who do we think this camera is aimed for?' pretty much has no point. Obviously, manufacturer is 'setting' their own trend in camera line. They are asking only one question: Can we cut the production cost? Hence one card slot less, lighter body. Control layout almost the same without substantial difference between Dxxxx, Dxxx and Dx series. Not to mention previous duds with backfocus issue (D7000), unacceptable noise level with D7100, oil drops on D600's shutter. I forgot what's happen with D750. In my opinion, after the line D300/D700/D3 that company is thinking more of cutting production costs than of its own name and reputation. My thoughts (worth 1200$ multiplied with as many new models in near future) are that I will invest in some high quality scanner and revert back to film photography. After all photography is not feeding me and my family. Cheers
I agree. The D7500 is sort of a lateral move to the D7200/D7100. They took away the DOF preview function and a card slot, BUT give you faster AF like that found on the D500, so I'd almost say this is something of its own.... I'm surprised they didn't start a D8000 line for this camera.
Honestly. Only buy the d500 if you have/ plan on buying decent glass. It's a waste of money throwing so much money on a camera body while still using kit lenses
Heh, I *knew* what the bit at the beginning would be about :) I've had cards fail on me in the past. The second slot in both the D7000 and now in my D7100 saved me. I always shoot RAW to both slots in case of an emergency. Without a second card slot I won't consider buying this camera. At all. It's a crucial feature for me and a deal breaker if a camera doesn't have one. I absolutely don't understand why Nikon chose to omit the second slot. With two SD slots, the smaller buffer and the slower framerate it would still be different enough from the D500... Other than that it sounds great on paper! The D500 sensor is amazing and those who don't care about the second slot will love that they can get this image quality without having to pay more for a D500. Although, the D500 is absolutely worth it. A photographer I always meet at my favorite zoo has both a D500 and the new Nikkor 70-200/2.8... It's incredible and I get jealous every time I see his gear! :'D
I've been using the Nikon D3200 for almost two years now. I love it. If I was gonna upgrade I would consider the D7200, D7500, and D7500 the D7200 is great and cheaper than both, but I like the 4k in the other two. The D7500 is cheaper by about a grand, but you're obviously getting more with the D500
I think you are on point when you said that the D7500 is a new line. This is just like when Canon changed the X0D series when 50D changed to the 60D. The 60D was based on the Rebel with a stronger plastic and extra battery. Nikon did the same thing with the D7500. I think the D7500 is a good camera for people who are looking to replace their D3X00 or D5X00 cameras. If you need 2 card slots, get the D500.
Just recently I stepped up to the D500 from the D7200 and I'm glad I did! Since seeing that the newer "stepped up" version, the D7500 is more a sidestep with the trading off it does. So, in hindsight, I made the wiser move. Thanks for the review, Matt. Good luck in the Big Apple, brother!
I have 2 D7200's and I love them. I don't shoot that much video and the video I do shoot is fine at 1080 X 60 or even 30fps. Most of my video is shot with my D3200 actually. No need for 4K or tilt screen. The absence of the second card slot is huge. I like to make sure in the event something happens, I have a back up. No interest in the D7500.
I started my photography career as a hobby with D3000, then upgraded to d7000 used it for year nd half, wanted to upgrade again as wanted better focus and low light capability. Borrowed D7200 frm a friend, rented D750 nd as no one had D500 so had to go to shop to test it. They were kind enough to let me use it for 2 hours on street being an old customer. D500 was it within few minutes. The iso button placement, focusing system WOW. It just doesn't know how to lose focus. Full frame was never my creteria.just wanted an all round camera for another 5 yrs or so. D500 It is. Been using it fr 2 months now. Nd it just makes me happy with every click. Plus body is good to hold considering i have quite big hands. I still require a battery grip. Battery doesn't last full day With video and stills.
Love my D500. Bought it partly due to your great reviews. Use it mainly for long walks in the Florida wetlands shooting birds and gators. At first missed the "A" setting for when I was in a hurry and not sure I had settings correct but "P" mode does fine as well as four user pre sets you can set up. Use your setup video from time to time to make sure my "a" option is normal to your settings. Keep up the good work.
Matt, I really appreciate your analysis of the newly announced D7500. The D7500 has piqued my interest, though I'm still very happy with my D7100. As a serious amateur, I *could* afford the D500, but I'd rather spend my money on better lenses. Your view that Nikon eliminated the extra card slot to make the body smaller makes sense. My theory was that modern SD cards are inexpensive, fast and reliable enough that redundancy is no longer needed in Nikon's consumer line and this was an opportunity for further differentiation from the pro line.
Totally agree. No dual SD, no AI/AIS. Other links have said Nikon flipped the numbers, this should be a D5700, not a D7500. I own the D500 and D750. Better to buy a used/refurbished D500 for the cost.
This camera should have been called the D6000 and started a new series. It does not deserve to be part of the 7000 series, and should not be confusingly labled as such. I've been a Nikon guy since I started, and my first DSLR was a D7000 back in 2010. This is a big blunder though, and makes me start to consider some other options.
@matt - Currently I am using D5100 and willing to switch and I am a Landscape shooter and also I have low budget. which is why I am going for Manual lenses like samyang 10mm and samyang 85mm with the kit zoom lens .. Wanted to go for D7200 but the Pentax k-3 II just blow me away with it's features .. I know nikon is the best as I am using one already but cant find the power to break free and get the GPS stabilizer gyro level out of my mind while I will be in a distinct place in himalaya ..
I'm shooting a D800 and D300s...I'm looking forward to upgrading later this fall with the new 5th Generation D810 Upgrade, and either a new Nikon Pro Mirrorless or Fuji XT 2 !
I had my D7100 repaired by Nikon when the shutter failed after over 100k exposures. While I was waiting for the repair I bought a refurbished D7200. They're both great. I was on the fence about getting a D500 instead but it wasn't out yet. I regularly shoot over 1000 images in one day, all on one battery and one card, and with either body. If one of my cameras dies, I think the D7500 represents a worthwhile upgrade because of the continuous shooting speed and improved buffer. Of course, I'll be thinking about the D500 again, though. I wonder if there will be a D500S.
What I think is that Nikon removed one SD card slot to protect the sales of the D500. Anyone looking for a dual SD card slot within the DX realm will have to step up to the D500.
I'll be sticking with my D7200, thank you very much. This is a classic example of making cameras for the sake of making cameras. One step forward, 8 steps back!
I have a D7100 and after 3 years i'm still learning new things from it, and finding new ways to be creative with it. Heavily into macro photography so am thinking about a D750/D800 specifically for that - more megapixels, better lower light handling etc, and keeping the D7100 for everything else (or maybe a D500 as a replacement if/when prices come down a little). I was hoping the next D7xxx would be a step up, but it doesn't feel like it is....
I was waiting for this release to make a decision on upgrading my D5200. I think I will wait patiently for a sale for d500 and make my move when it goes down below $1500. What really did it for me was the missing SD card slot when choosing to pass on the D7500.
Have a D7200 and love it... Won't be changing any time soon... Just hope this D7500 isn't a disappointing prelude to whatever the D810 replacement is going to be...
I currently have a D7100 and I was waiting for what Nikon would come out with to see if I would upgrade or not. Overall, I see this camera as a lower end model, not worth being part of the 7xxx lineup. Hopefully, they'll do better with the 750/810 replacements.
The D7500 is a successor to the D5600, with a vertical-tilt LCD instead of a side-flip screen, lower noise via the D500's 21 Mpix sensor, and a major auto-focus upgrade. It also has 4K, for those who don't mind the ridiculous crop factor. Two reasons it should be consided part of the D5X00 line: the single SD slot and its lack of light sensor support for AIS manual lenses. Along with the flippy screen, those were two of the main functional differences between the D5X00 and the D7100/D7200. But is it worth twice the price of a D5600? Well...
I'm a 7100 guy too. I've been very happy with it. I would like to go full frame. I'm waiting for the D500's features with a full frame sensor that is still below $2500. Maybe that's called a dream, but a guy can dream, right?
why? coz you use the second one as backup? what are you a portrait shooter? because you cant use it as backup if you're trying to burst.. takes ages for the buffer to clear this way..
I'm using the D5300, and getting great shots from it. Looking forward to stepping up to the D500. Had a lot of doubts beween D500 and going to Full frame.
I have been shooting a D7100 for several years and love it. I'm not sure what Nikon is thinking with the D7500. I agree with Matt, the single card slot is a show stopper. There wasn't enough in the D7200 for me to upgrade to it. I am currently planning on a D750 to the kit bag to get an FX sensor and better low light capabilities. This is another miss for Nikon. I sure hope they get their act together. The two things I was hoping for out of the successor for the D7200 were improved low-light performance and bigger and faster buffer to drive up FPS. The D7500 delivered those things, but missed the boat by dropping a card slot.
Use a D3200 for studio portraiture and events where i have control of the light .... i was looking at the D500 for my upgrade but.. based on this and what i thought was going to be something really cool... i ll just buy the D7200 dual cards IS important to me as is the 24 megapixel, again i shoot artificial light strobes or constant i dont need the dynamic range etc etc i do most in post edit... so its either a D3300 and premium glass... (Sigma art comes to mind) or a D7200 with maybe a Sigma 50 1.4 prime. Thanks for your preview... now im clear of what to get.
Currently using a D5100 from 6 years ago. Since i have been getting more into photography over the last year. i am finding my current camera, i find i am missing a lot of the shots that the D7500 or D500 would easily allow me to take. both low light focusing & especially the quick burst shots. I have always been saving up for the D500 but am now strongly thinking about the D7500. Thank you for the comparison.
Great overview and assessment. I would only add that the D7500 has automatic microfocus adjustment. That is potentially huge if it works. I spend too much time tweeking the MFA. Touch screen and tilt screen are nice additions. Snapbridge would be if they can ever get it working reliably. Lighter weight sounds promising but single card slot makes it a non-starter for any work for 3rd parties that is not easy to replicate. Sounds like they saved space and weight by deleting the built-in AF engine for older lenses -- makes sense to me. IN SHORT it just depends on the application. Deleting the second card slot is a risk on Nikon's part.
Thanks for the video! I'd love to see a comparision between the D7500 and the new D5600, because the difference doesn't realy show in the Nikon comparision webpage. I can't find significant changes exept the botton layout....so I hope you can help me with that. Thank you and Greetings
After dropping my D7000 in a pond I bought the D500, traded a D3300 in for it. It's great. I'm in the market for a consumer camera, but would rather buy the D5500 than a D7000 series. Why? The only things the D7200/7500 series has over the D5500 or D5600 is the autofocus motor to enable use of lenses without native autofocus capability, and the U1 and U2 presets. I can live without U1/U2 and all of my lenses have autofocus motors. So no reason to get the D7500 for me. The D5--- series have exposure bracketing which the D3---- series don't. So if you can live without full frame, get the D5----, and if you need speed, add a D500. As Matt says, skip this one. One more thing, skip the D5600, get the D5500. Snapbridge sucks.
If it takes a different battery than the D7200, that would chill any upgrade temptation for 7200 owners. I'm not ready to upgrade my D7100, but when I do, the D7200 price will make it hard to resist. If I want to go to the D7500, I'll sit on the sidelines another two years for Nikon to come out with the D7600!
Agree, stupid to bin the second slot, it is clear to see why the specs are a little better than the D7200 and not quite as good as a D500, as the camera must fit in-between and the price must fit in between, I have no desire to buy this as I would get a D500, for an extra £400 in the UK, the good thing now is that the D500 will drop price quickly, so mid to late summer the D500 will be aprox £1500.00, nice review thanks
Mik Hail Which is a good choice. Throwing out the money for a 7500 wouldnt be smart imho. d500 is a pro body with waaay better specs. plus by this point you probably have a good collection of lenses
Same here. I've been using my D7100 for years now but I wanted to treat myself with an upgrade. I was reading all fantastic things about the rumored D7500 but I'm not happy about it anymore. I've decided to upgrade a little bit further and will get the D500
I have a D500 and D7500, the D500 have waaay better specs but for birds and wildlife, the end result the images are the same. 2 fps faster makes no difference, 1 card slot makes no difference as I have not had a card fail in 10yrs. Battery Grip, no issue as the D500 grip is crazy expensive. I bought the D7500 with a Sigma 100-400 as a hiking camera photographing wildlife and birds in the mountains. Sad to say but my D500 have not seen a lot of work.
I am not a pro. Upgrading on tight budget is the name of the game. I have a Nikon 5100 and I am spoiled by the articulating screen. So on the 7500 when it came out. I was disappointed it didn't have a touch screen that was similar to the Canon's 80 d. I have shot in old missions, air shows too. The dual slots and higher Iso really don't impress me. Also the buffer. I am leaning towards the 7200. A great camera. lower price. It is proven. All I have heard is good things. No problems with it. Can you ask for anything more?
I have the D7200, love that camera. It does everything I need it to do. I carry a D3300 to work for my pictures on the road. I'll pass on the D7500. My son has the D5500 and loves that camera. If and when I move up it will probably be the D500.
I have a d7200 and I like it though I'd like a full frame camera . Anyways I think d7500 is focused toward vloggers who are just beginning or have become decently good at vlogging and want to do it on a budget. only thing lacking from d7200 is 4K which I really don't need and who needs swiveling screen when you can see your LCD view on your cell phone screen
I've been shooting with a D2x and D5100 and have been considering either the 7200 or the 500 to replace my not-dead-but-dying 5100. I want the fps but would rather spend the difference on better glass. Now the 7500 comes along. Perfect timing. Mind made up, glass and 8fps will work for me.
Matt made a fair review of the camera, i come here for the comments usually, the may be constructive but a lot of people today is complaining about new tecnology like they have not enough capacity to practice, improve and get the last and best of their tools, i mean, most of us are photograpers here and it seems like we depend on the new tech to make better results instead of using our brain, creativity and technique, i feel upset because i am here to learn and find a lot of crying from people who several times only achieve sharp pictures of mediocre ideas, that is sad, gear improvements sometimes slow down our capacity to develop a better way to make photo, you can do great with "obsolete" gear.
If you look at Tony Northrups video of the d500 vs d7200. It beats it in IQ. So yes the d7500 beats the d7200. If I was at a d7200 I wouldn't get it and go straight to the d500. Though if I was going from the d3/5xxx I would move to a d7500. If more features are needed you have the d500.
I must admit, I wonder if this really is a replacement for the D7200 or whether they've tried to re-jig the product line where you go pro (D500, D5), compact and high quality (D7500) or beginner. The D7200 really sits between the D500 and the D7500 in terms of still camera features, although I do wish it had a tilty touch screen.
1 card slot!? WTF? It's 2017...having two is standard now. I was sold on the tilt screen and bigger buffer and the price is reasonable...but I'd rather have the extra resolution (the stock image agency I shoot for won't take files under 24MP's on a crop sensor) and be able to back up to a second card while I'm shooting...so for now I'll stick with my D7100 as a back up to my FX. Actually, one of only two reasons I never jumped completely to Fuji is that they didn't have 24MP sensors and dual card slots until the new X-T2. Nikon's trying a lot harder than Canon with the new stuff I think...I like that there are lots of cameras/lenses to choose from...but they're still not wowing me like Fuji. It sounds like the D7500 is in between the D7000 series and D5000...capable for sure, but the single card slot is what kills it for me.
I have two D7000s mainly for video and still love them. The extra card slot isn't a deal breaker for me, but the older models are always much less expensive for similar tech so I'm not running out to buy this. I would love to have: the flip screen (don't know if the 7100 or 7200 have this); the ability to change aperture in live view (like the D810 - not sure if the others do this?); a lock so the mode dial doesn't slip off of "M" (I think I see this?); and most of all focus peaking, which none of the cameras seem to have. I often use an external monitor but that would be amazing. They did add zebra stripes but exposure is less of an issue for me than maintaining accurate manual focus with video.
One card slot is definitely a deal breaker for even me for whom photography is just a hobby. I currently use D7000... and use dual card slot for all my trips to have backup of my photos...
Interesting camera. I've been thinking of upgrading my D7000 to the D7200, and now this appears. Yes, Nikon dropped some D500 features, like a second card slot. I'm not sure that's a deal breaker for me. I like the fact it has a built in flash which can control the Creative Lighting System speedlights. I've got an SB800 and SB900. For video, it has clean HDMI output so you can record 4K to an external recorder. The form factor looks like it will feel better in hand. Side by side image comparisons will be nice to see when the D7500 is released.
From a Canon user's point of view, I'd get this over the 80D, by far. I'm mainly a video kind of guy, and with the 4K I really think that this camera is great for my aviation hobby. To film through fences I'd need a 300mm lens, and compared to Canon or Panasonic, Nikon's 300mm lens seems to give what I need for the price. I really think this is a camera designed to convert those who'd otherwise buy something like the 80D for a combi camera.
I have the D5600, and pure gadget lust has me seeking justifications to upgrade, but I just can't find one. I don't shoot sports or birds in flight, so I don't need rocket auto focus. The D5600 is 24mp vs 20, and to upgrade to any of them, means giving up my fully articulating touch screen. The D5600 in my view, is very underrated, and a superb value for the potrait/landscape prosumer.
What a stupid move on Nikon's part to only put one card slot! I own the d500 and I absolutely love it! The iso performance on this camera is absolutely incredible!
I'm due for a new camera upgrade - to go for the rangefinder mode (e.g. Sony a6500, etc.) or retain mirrored DSLRs system (e.g. Nikon D500, etc.). I'll wait a few months for the price to stabilize and more in depth reviews from web and users I might know who will have one when it goes for retail.
Hi buddy, I've had a Sony Mirrorless after selling my nikon d7000. I love my new setup but wanted to say thank you for great videos and tips over my nikon years. Best wishes :-)
I have a D7200 and love it. Been shooting it for about 6 months now with Nikon lens and Sigma and works great for all I need which is a serious amateur and also getting paid for some. Will get a full frame one of these days but not for the near future. I don't see why Nikon did some of the stuff for the 7500 I think the D7200 will be better then the 7500. But will see as it comes out cause Nikon I'm sure coming out with a replacement for the D500 and so on always moving forward hopefully
Been shooting a D7000 for years now, so I'm always excited (and envious) to see what its replacement looks like. It's not like there's a chance I'd upgrade, but hell. One card slot? That's ridiculous. I don't care for wifi, bluetooth or NFC, but having two card slots in a higher end DSLR is a must. Like you said, dumbed down. Whether that's because Nikon wants to make a clear separation between the D7000 series and the D500 or not, it seems like an idiotic move. On paper it's not that much better than the D7200, so why would anyone spend more to get it?
I own the 7200 and the 500, by far the 7200 is my go to body for weight and travel size. the 500 is awesome if you can use a tripod. however, of them all, my favorite body out of my lineup including my d5 and d4x is my d3s.
I also heard and seen pictures that support that Nikon is not adding a MB Battery Grip for this D7500?? I saw pictures of the bottom the the D7500 that show no inputs for a battery Grip.. Can anyone else tell me if I am right or wrong? I am sticking with my D7200 thank you very much.. I get 2 card slots, and a battery grip. I also have 24MP resolution.. Who cares about the flippy touch screen.. My next SLR will be the Nikon D500. Not sure what Nikon was thinking..
I love my D7200. I'll definitely be getting the D7500. 4k and flipscreen are more important to me than a 2nd slot but I am disappointed it doesn't have a magnesium body.
I have a d7100 and I like it a lot, use it very frequently and had it for four years now and still going strong, but if I get the chance I would like to get the d500 or d810 if possible, the d7500 is not an upgrade is more for a fist time buyer of a dslr and coming from a point and shoot camera
From your pictures too, it does appear that there will be NO MB battery grip as on the D700, D7100 & the D7200.. If that is the case, it surely is a waste of an upgrade.. I skip it and keep my D7200 until it dies then move up to a D500..
Well coming from the D5100 I guess that everything is a step up. I don't know but I feel like it worth going for a used D500 this one seems a mini version of it.
I've got the D7000, and with the shutter count getting incredibly close to 250.000 shots, I was waiting out for Nikon to announce a D7300 (which was the D7500). The single SD-slot, though, has pushed me back to probably the D7200 (one does need to work within ones budget, so not likely to go for the D500).
You don't mention in the video, but apparently the D7500 has no AI indexing for AI and AIS manual focus lenses. That's a deal breaker for me. This is clearly an extension of the 5000 line, not a proper replacement to the D7200.
I think I'm one of the few who is fine with this camera. Yes the naming is weird, but so was the naming of the D750 which everyone said wasn't a true successor to the D700 when it came out. I do video professionally and I like this cameras specs and the potential to be a great B-cam or something a bit lighter and with good specs to take on location shoots. You can complain about the 1SD card slot all you want, but the Sony A7 line still only supports one SD card slot and they have done excellent. I think that this is a good camera, yes it has its flaws but so does every other camera and because this is the internet people pre-judge a cameras abilities and sales figures based purely by what's on paper. Wait for it to come out, get out and shoot with it in a real world situation and not charts and then form an opinion on if it's right for you or not.
I'm looking for a bit better camera up from my D3500, It's lacking some important features to make Photogrametry and architectural reference photography easier. I'm not looking to spend a ton as I don't do traditional photography, I also have some decent quality DX lenses so not looking to go full frame. I was leaning towards the D7500 but it's lacking some resolution that the D7200 has, it also has a second card slot for easier backups. Should I buy the D7200?
I use a D7200 and a assorted collection Nikon 35mm film cameras… and some Mamiya medium format, so for me it is basically Nikon and Mamiya (PhaseOne). With them ditching the second card holder and the in camera AF-system it simply feels more like a “marketing-ploy-toy-thing” then a legit evolution of the 7000 line of cameras.
Thanks Matt - Currently using the D7000 and wanted to upgrade to the D7500, but listening to your video it seems that the D7500 is a dumber down version of the D500 at half the price? As they say, the D500 (Professional Use) the D7500 for (Consumer Use)?
I am using d7500 .. I am no professional .. But enthusiast .. The reasons I preferred 7500 over the 7200, are: 1: extremely fast performance .. 2: Tilt and touch screen for weird angles .. 3: 4k recording (although not much needed but definitely it is worth consideration) But no doubt I hated single card slot option as much as any other has hated it .. I only wished it has 2 card slots .. But the bright side is that I got a 3 months used d7500* camera with Shutter Count less than 1500 .. Barely used in 2 wedding functions by the previous owner .. 9 months official warranty remaining (In Pakistan, official warranty is limited to 1 year only) .. Worth 100000 Pakistani Rupees almost 820 US Dollars .. While the price of a new d7200* is well above 120000 new and around 100000 used (warranty over and shutter count above 15000 to 20000) .. So I think what I got is a fair deal ... * with the Nikorr 18-140 f3.5 VR lens ..
I started with a D3300 and then got the D7200, I use the dual slots not as backup but for continuity writing. I can't find a reason to upgrade to the D7500 but If I still had the D3300 I think I'll go for the 7500 instead of the 7200. That said, weight and the grip is the only thing I complain about my D7200.
The upgrades both Nikon and Cannon are making to their new cameras are so insignificant there is no reason to upgrade from the older models and don't justify the outrageous prices. I got a used D7100 for 400$ more than 2 years ago and see no reason at all to pay 3 times that for the minor improvements the D7500 brings. Getting the D7500 might make sense for someone new to photography but even then, the outlandish price would drive a lot of people away to cheaper alternatives or to the used market.
Got the D3200 when it first came out. I shoot families, landscape, and engagement sessions. ITS TIME TO UPGRADE! I wanted the d7200, then 7500 came out, should I just suck it up till I can get a d500? Duel card slot is a big loss and so is the ability to place a battery grip on the d7500.
Who do you think this is aimed at? Its fast, lightweight, less battery life and a mix of latest gen and last gen tech... Vloggers who want a lighter 4k camera? Hikers and birders willing to trade weight for the advantages of the D500??
I think Nikon failed with this camera. There's no point in upgrading from a D7100/D7200. The only good things over those are the sensor and the buffer. EDIT: and the tilty screen.
Its so odd, neither hikers or birders would probably be willing to go with 1 card slot only. If I imagine myself hiking out and having an issue with a card and possibly lose the whole trip, wow what a downer. This just makes no sense that such a camera has no dual card slot. I got the D7200 and was looking forward to this, but like you said its not a follow up, it seems it got lost in the middle of nowhere.
I think the lack of that backup card slot is a huge issue for anyone wanting to upgrade to the prosumer level. Also, write speeds of relatively inexpensive RAM is now low enough that it should be relatively cheap / easy to include a buffer capable of holding far in excess of a few hundred shots.
Drawbacks vs D7200:
· Just one SD card slot
· Can't use vertical grip
· No magnesium alloy chasis
· No index ring (can't use AI/AI-S lenses)
· Lower resolution LCD
This is not a D7500, this is a D5700!!!
I got the 7500, works great, way better than the 7200. This is not a pro camera, but a good photographer can make it work like a pro camera, don`t focus on gear, more on technique.
I think the D7500 is going to be good for D7200 and D500 sales. people who have been holding off purchasing a D7200 until its replacement is announced will go ahead and grab the cheaper and better D7200. people like myself who have held off a D500 purchase incase the D7200 replacement was amazing now realize that its not even close so we'll just go ahead and buy the D500. Who will buy the D7500? People who don't already own a DSLR and shop at Best Buy.
Exactly! I'll be waiting till the end of the year to pick up a D7200 to replace my D7100 with it's way too small buffer...can't believe that we've had to wait this long only to be disappointed in the end...
i agree..
Use Best Buy to test out lenses then buy them from BH
Dane Liberatore renting costs money.returning to Best Buy is free what are you saying no for? Lol
Dane Liberatore true true
I have a D7200. I think it is a great camera. Seems to me, when compared with the D7500 that the D7200 is still the better camera.
Theytoldmetodoit1 I've had my D7100 for a couple years now and wanted to skip the D7200 to look into the one there after... or go full frame. Now it looks like I'll be sticking with the D7100 or going full frame.
Robert Steich go full frame
Shoot film? 😏
Robert Steich Go full frame if you don't have to change up all your lenses. For the price of a new 7500 you can get full frame
For me the upgrade would be the D500. Am very happy with the D7200 too though. And as Angry points out, the D7500 has no support for AI lenses - oops. That means there are currently manufactured lenses Nikon produce that will not work on your new Nikon D7500 DSLR. I think the single card slot is a retrograde step and it is not even XQD. Plus, the two things they could have ditched from the D7200 remain - the annoying stacked dials with child-proof buttons and the poor viewfinder. This is an odd "progression" in the Nikon line-up
The D7500 is not a D7200 replacement/Upgrade. Everybody is cracking a rib about the specs. There are lots of people who does not carry the budget to buy a D500 but who shoot a bit of school sports, birds, wildlife and some video. This is not aimed at the pro market!!!! Pro Level we have D5/D810, "pro DX" we have D500/D7200 and mid range DX we have D7500/D5600. So a sport/wildlife camera and a general purpose camera in the different categories. Speaking to a well know retailer who service the wildlife/Nature/Sport shooters. They have young people, students, low budget wildlife/bird shooters who grab this camera. So well done Matt. At least one reviewer who see this camera for what it is. A action/sport camera for the consumer market who is very happy..
Matt,
Thanks for the review. I shoot with a D7200, and really like it. The two cards and the battery life are really important. The lighter weight of the D7500 would be nice, but is not worth the loss of the other features.
Thanks again
also the loss of the magnesium alloy body... two months ago i was comparing cameras for which i should buy and in the end it was either the d7500 or d7200, i still chose the d7200 because the build quality for me was more important than those few better specs
landscapes/portrait = D7200
Sports/wildlife/4k = D500
Don't care = D7500
I've bought the D500 last week and got a bit worried after the first rumors about the D7500 popped up on Reddit, but after seeing the specs of the D7500, I definitely made the right choice.
My wife just purchased the D7200 over the d7500 for some of the reasons you stated. She has been to photography school and wondered away from it. Now getting back to it she wanted a pro model unfortunately we can't afford one. She settled on the 7200 for the dual sd slot. And slightly higher MP. Pretty sure she made the right choice. She got some amazing shots at an airshow. Some beautiful sunset shots at the beach. She loves it. Now i wish i could take photos half as good as hers. Love the 7200.
I have the D7100 and I will stick with it. The D7500 not only has just one single card slot, there's also missing the support for Ai and Ai-S lenses. And when you look underneath the camera, the support for battery grips seems to be missing as well. Is that confimed?
Recall the middle of Nikon's DX line started with D70 that was build with many of the same construction features and followed on through the D90. Then things changed when the D7000 came out with more metal build, dual slots and the feeler. The D300 never got replaced until the D500 finally came out. So its back to like it was when the D200 was introduced and followed by the D80 same sensor processor much less body features. So its back to to 2005.
I have aD7500 and it fits my needs very well. Upgrade from D5300. Tracking, focusing, speed well worth the upgrade. Saved $700Cdn.during the May Nikon sale. Most drawbacks mentioned in comments are insignificant for me.
Hi Matt.....There's also no in body focusing motor, the battery has 15% less capacity BTW. LCD resolution is 980K dots(approx.) The one card slot should be an imprisonable offence!
Errrr yes there is.
Thanks Matt, I have the D5100 and currently use the 18-140mm lens rather than kit. However, I'm considering the next upgrade and going full frame, probably the D750 replacement. However, a bit of me is thinking of the D500 and staying with crop.
I've read some articles (e.g. from Tony and Chelsea) who say that full frame lens such as the 70-200 2.8 are not as sharp on crop cameras. If that is true then what are the professional DX lens?
Have you done a video on using FX lens on DX Bodies, or really, does it not make any difference?
Well Matt I think that force is not strong anymore in Nikon's family. I started to shoot with Nikon's gear 1989. That time I have transferred from Canon. Why? Mainly because I was spoiled kid. BUT...the first Nikon I took (F3HP) gave me the feeling that i hold something special, reliable, useful. That was the way all brands use to practice. And almost all cameras from that time proved their quality. Many of them are still performing strong even these day. Manufacturers used to listen customers.
Present time: No acknowledged feedback between manufacturers and customers a.k.a. buyers.
So that question 'Who do we think this camera is aimed for?' pretty much has no point.
Obviously, manufacturer is 'setting' their own trend in camera line.
They are asking only one question: Can we cut the production cost? Hence one card slot less, lighter body. Control layout almost the same without substantial difference between Dxxxx, Dxxx and Dx series. Not to mention previous duds with backfocus issue (D7000), unacceptable noise level with D7100, oil drops on D600's shutter. I forgot what's happen with D750. In my opinion, after the line D300/D700/D3 that company is thinking more of cutting production costs than of its own name and reputation.
My thoughts (worth 1200$ multiplied with as many new models in near future) are that I will invest in some high quality scanner and revert back to film photography. After all photography is not feeding me and my family.
Cheers
I agree. The D7500 is sort of a lateral move to the D7200/D7100. They took away the DOF preview function and a card slot, BUT give you faster AF like that found on the D500, so I'd almost say this is something of its own.... I'm surprised they didn't start a D8000 line for this camera.
I have a d500. Love it. you might as well just save abit more and buy the d500 or get the d7200 and buy a good lens.
Honestly. Only buy the d500 if you have/ plan on buying decent glass. It's a waste of money throwing so much money on a camera body while still using kit lenses
tolga1cool it depends what you are shooting. I shoot motorsport and the 10fps help me get the shots I need. but yes you do need good glass as well.
Andy Sheen But especially for sports the kit lenses won't cut it anyways. But yes I agree. The frame rate and focusing are needed
tolga1cool yes I agree the kit lens will need an upgrade, I bought mine body only.
I guess nobody buys the D7200 and uses it with the kit lenses either...
I currently own the d7200 and I wouldn't dare to upgrade to the d7500. I'd instead go for the d500. Totally agree. Thanks for that great video 👏👌👍
Heh, I *knew* what the bit at the beginning would be about :)
I've had cards fail on me in the past. The second slot in both the D7000 and now in my D7100 saved me. I always shoot RAW to both slots in case of an emergency.
Without a second card slot I won't consider buying this camera. At all. It's a crucial feature for me and a deal breaker if a camera doesn't have one.
I absolutely don't understand why Nikon chose to omit the second slot. With two SD slots, the smaller buffer and the slower framerate it would still be different enough from the D500...
Other than that it sounds great on paper! The D500 sensor is amazing and those who don't care about the second slot will love that they can get this image quality without having to pay more for a D500.
Although, the D500 is absolutely worth it. A photographer I always meet at my favorite zoo has both a D500 and the new Nikkor 70-200/2.8... It's incredible and I get jealous every time I see his gear! :'D
I've been using the Nikon D3200 for almost two years now. I love it. If I was gonna upgrade I would consider the D7200, D7500, and D7500 the D7200 is great and cheaper than both, but I like the 4k in the other two. The D7500 is cheaper by about a grand, but you're obviously getting more with the D500
I think you are on point when you said that the D7500 is a new line. This is just like when Canon changed the X0D series when 50D changed to the 60D. The 60D was based on the Rebel with a stronger plastic and extra battery. Nikon did the same thing with the D7500. I think the D7500 is a good camera for people who are looking to replace their D3X00 or D5X00 cameras. If you need 2 card slots, get the D500.
Just recently I stepped up to the D500 from the D7200 and I'm glad I did! Since seeing that the newer "stepped up" version, the D7500 is more a sidestep with the trading off it does.
So, in hindsight, I made the wiser move. Thanks for the review, Matt. Good luck in the Big Apple, brother!
I have 2 D7200's and I love them. I don't shoot that much video and the video I do shoot is fine at 1080 X 60 or even 30fps. Most of my video is shot with my D3200 actually. No need for 4K or tilt screen. The absence of the second card slot is huge. I like to make sure in the event something happens, I have a back up. No interest in the D7500.
I started my photography career as a hobby with D3000, then upgraded to d7000 used it for year nd half, wanted to upgrade again as wanted better focus and low light capability. Borrowed D7200 frm a friend, rented D750 nd as no one had D500 so had to go to shop to test it. They were kind enough to let me use it for 2 hours on street being an old customer. D500 was it within few minutes. The iso button placement, focusing system WOW. It just doesn't know how to lose focus. Full frame was never my creteria.just wanted an all round camera for another 5 yrs or so. D500 It is. Been using it fr 2 months now. Nd it just makes me happy with every click. Plus body is good to hold considering i have quite big hands. I still require a battery grip. Battery doesn't last full day With video and stills.
Love my D500. Bought it partly due to your great reviews. Use it mainly for long walks in the Florida wetlands shooting birds and gators. At first missed the "A" setting for when I was in a hurry and not sure I had settings correct but "P" mode does fine as well as four user pre sets you can set up. Use your setup video from time to time to make sure my "a" option is normal to your settings. Keep up the good work.
Matt, I really appreciate your analysis of the newly announced D7500. The D7500 has piqued my interest, though I'm still very happy with my D7100. As a serious amateur, I *could* afford the D500, but I'd rather spend my money on better lenses. Your view that Nikon eliminated the extra card slot to make the body smaller makes sense. My theory was that modern SD cards are inexpensive, fast and reliable enough that redundancy is no longer needed in Nikon's consumer line and this was an opportunity for further differentiation from the pro line.
Totally agree. No dual SD, no AI/AIS. Other links have said Nikon flipped the numbers, this should be a D5700, not a D7500. I own the D500 and D750. Better to buy a used/refurbished D500 for the cost.
This camera should have been called the D6000 and started a new series. It does not deserve to be part of the 7000 series, and should not be confusingly labled as such. I've been a Nikon guy since I started, and my first DSLR was a D7000 back in 2010. This is a big blunder though, and makes me start to consider some other options.
@matt - Currently I am using D5100 and willing to switch and I am a Landscape shooter and also I have low budget. which is why I am going for Manual lenses like samyang 10mm and samyang 85mm with the kit zoom lens .. Wanted to go for D7200 but the Pentax k-3 II just blow me away with it's features ..
I know nikon is the best as I am using one already but cant find the power to break free and get the GPS stabilizer gyro level out of my mind while I will be in a distinct place in himalaya ..
I'm shooting a D800 and D300s...I'm looking forward to upgrading later this fall with the new 5th Generation D810 Upgrade, and either a new Nikon Pro Mirrorless or Fuji XT 2 !
I had my D7100 repaired by Nikon when the shutter failed after over 100k exposures. While I was waiting for the repair I bought a refurbished D7200. They're both great. I was on the fence about getting a D500 instead but it wasn't out yet. I regularly shoot over 1000 images in one day, all on one battery and one card, and with either body. If one of my cameras dies, I think the D7500 represents a worthwhile upgrade because of the continuous shooting speed and improved buffer. Of course, I'll be thinking about the D500 again, though. I wonder if there will be a D500S.
Do we finally have aperture control in video mode? I think we need some more information on its video capabilities.
Sticking with my D7100. Still does everything I need.
What I think is that Nikon removed one SD card slot to protect the sales of the D500. Anyone looking for a dual SD card slot within the DX realm will have to step up to the D500.
I'll be sticking with my D7200, thank you very much. This is a classic example of making cameras for the sake of making cameras. One step forward, 8 steps back!
I have a D7100 and after 3 years i'm still learning new things from it, and finding new ways to be creative with it. Heavily into macro photography so am thinking about a D750/D800 specifically for that - more megapixels, better lower light handling etc, and keeping the D7100 for everything else (or maybe a D500 as a replacement if/when prices come down a little).
I was hoping the next D7xxx would be a step up, but it doesn't feel like it is....
I was waiting for this release to make a decision on upgrading my D5200. I think I will wait patiently for a sale for d500 and make my move when it goes down below $1500. What really did it for me was the missing SD card slot when choosing to pass on the D7500.
Have a D7200 and love it... Won't be changing any time soon... Just hope this D7500 isn't a disappointing prelude to whatever the D810 replacement is going to be...
I currently have a D7100 and I was waiting for what Nikon would come out with to see if I would upgrade or not. Overall, I see this camera as a lower end model, not worth being part of the 7xxx lineup. Hopefully, they'll do better with the 750/810 replacements.
agree
The D7500 is a successor to the D5600, with a vertical-tilt LCD instead of a side-flip screen, lower noise via the D500's 21 Mpix sensor, and a major auto-focus upgrade. It also has 4K, for those who don't mind the ridiculous crop factor. Two reasons it should be consided part of the D5X00 line: the single SD slot and its lack of light sensor support for AIS manual lenses. Along with the flippy screen, those were two of the main functional differences between the D5X00 and the D7100/D7200.
But is it worth twice the price of a D5600? Well...
One card slot??? I'll stick to my D7200.
+Wendell McMillan I agree! I'm still running a D7100 and am more than happy with it. Perhaps I should thank Nikon for not tempting me? ;) Enjoy!
I'm a 7100 guy too. I've been very happy with it. I would like to go full frame. I'm waiting for the D500's features with a full frame sensor that is still below $2500. Maybe that's called a dream, but a guy can dream, right?
Love my 7100, would only change if i had the cash for an 810!
why? coz you use the second one as backup? what are you a portrait shooter? because you cant use it as backup if you're trying to burst.. takes ages for the buffer to clear this way..
Just wifi it to a backup device.. On the fly. Works great.
I'm using the D5300, and getting great shots from it. Looking forward to stepping up to the D500. Had a lot of doubts beween D500 and going to Full frame.
the d500 have a ton of features that might be useful or useless to different people. if you want those extra features go for the d500.
I have been shooting a D7100 for several years and love it. I'm not sure what Nikon is thinking with the D7500. I agree with Matt, the single card slot is a show stopper. There wasn't enough in the D7200 for me to upgrade to it. I am currently planning on a D750 to the kit bag to get an FX sensor and better low light capabilities. This is another miss for Nikon. I sure hope they get their act together. The two things I was hoping for out of the successor for the D7200 were improved low-light performance and bigger and faster buffer to drive up FPS. The D7500 delivered those things, but missed the boat by dropping a card slot.
Use a D3200 for studio portraiture and events where i have control of the light .... i was looking at the D500 for my upgrade but.. based on this and what i thought was going to be something really cool... i ll just buy the D7200 dual cards IS important to me as is the 24 megapixel, again i shoot artificial light strobes or constant i dont need the dynamic range etc etc i do most in post edit... so its either a D3300 and premium glass... (Sigma art comes to mind) or a D7200 with maybe a Sigma 50 1.4 prime.
Thanks for your preview... now im clear of what to get.
i like the newer body design of nikon d7500 though and man that great sensor coming from nikon d500!
Currently using the D7200, and I think I'll be sticking to that one until I can afford the 500!
Currently using a D5100 from 6 years ago. Since i have been getting more into photography over the last year. i am finding my current camera, i find i am missing a lot of the shots that the D7500 or D500 would easily allow me to take. both low light focusing & especially the quick burst shots. I have always been saving up for the D500 but am now strongly thinking about the D7500.
Thank you for the comparison.
I shoot a D7100 and it's great. I'd never do without the dual card slots again. That was a weird move in my opinion.
Great overview and assessment. I would only add that the D7500 has automatic microfocus adjustment. That is potentially huge if it works. I spend too much time tweeking the MFA. Touch screen and tilt screen are nice additions. Snapbridge would be if they can ever get it working reliably. Lighter weight sounds promising but single card slot makes it a non-starter for any work for 3rd parties that is not easy to replicate. Sounds like they saved space and weight by deleting the built-in AF engine for older lenses -- makes sense to me. IN SHORT it just depends on the application. Deleting the second card slot is a risk on Nikon's part.
Let's hope that they will release worthy upgrades for the D750 and the legendary D810.
Thanks for the video! I'd love to see a comparision between the D7500 and the new D5600, because the difference doesn't realy show in the Nikon comparision webpage. I can't find significant changes exept the botton layout....so I hope you can help me with that.
Thank you and Greetings
After dropping my D7000 in a pond I bought the D500, traded a D3300 in for it. It's great. I'm in the market for a consumer camera, but would rather buy the D5500 than a D7000 series. Why? The only things the D7200/7500 series has over the D5500 or D5600 is the autofocus motor to enable use of lenses without native autofocus capability, and the U1 and U2 presets. I can live without U1/U2 and all of my lenses have autofocus motors. So no reason to get the D7500 for me. The D5--- series have exposure bracketing which the D3---- series don't. So if you can live without full frame, get the D5----, and if you need speed, add a D500. As Matt says, skip this one. One more thing, skip the D5600, get the D5500. Snapbridge sucks.
If it takes a different battery than the D7200, that would chill any upgrade temptation for 7200 owners. I'm not ready to upgrade my D7100, but when I do, the D7200 price will make it hard to resist. If I want to go to the D7500, I'll sit on the sidelines another two years for Nikon to come out with the D7600!
Agree, stupid to bin the second slot, it is clear to see why the specs are a little better than the D7200 and not quite as good as a D500, as the camera must fit in-between and the price must fit in between, I have no desire to buy this as I would get a D500, for an extra £400 in the UK, the good thing now is that the D500 will drop price quickly, so mid to late summer the D500 will be aprox £1500.00, nice review thanks
Hi there! I use D7100. My next body will be D500, and no way for D7500.
Mik Hail Which is a good choice. Throwing out the money for a 7500 wouldnt be smart imho. d500 is a pro body with waaay better specs. plus by this point you probably have a good collection of lenses
Hello....D7100 is one gem of a camera....and d500 with xqd card + sigma 150-600 mm is a weapon. (I have both cameras) :)
I have a 150-600 lens also) But Tamron.
Same here. I've been using my D7100 for years now but I wanted to treat myself with an upgrade. I was reading all fantastic things about the rumored D7500 but I'm not happy about it anymore. I've decided to upgrade a little bit further and will get the D500
I have a D500 and D7500, the D500 have waaay better specs but for birds and wildlife, the end result the images are the same. 2 fps faster makes no difference, 1 card slot makes no difference as I have not had a card fail in 10yrs. Battery Grip, no issue as the D500 grip is crazy expensive. I bought the D7500 with a Sigma 100-400 as a hiking camera photographing wildlife and birds in the mountains. Sad to say but my D500 have not seen a lot of work.
I am not a pro. Upgrading on tight budget is the name of the game. I have a Nikon 5100 and I am spoiled by the articulating screen. So on the 7500 when it came out. I was disappointed it didn't have a touch screen that was similar to the Canon's 80 d. I have shot in old missions, air shows too. The dual slots and higher Iso really don't impress me. Also the buffer. I am leaning towards the 7200. A great camera. lower price. It is proven. All I have heard is good things. No problems with it. Can you ask for anything more?
I have the D7200, love that camera. It does everything I need it to do. I carry a D3300 to work for my pictures on the road. I'll pass on the D7500. My son has the D5500 and loves that camera. If and when I move up it will probably be the D500.
I have a d7200 and I like it though I'd like a full frame camera . Anyways I think d7500 is focused toward vloggers who are just beginning or have become decently good at vlogging and want to do it on a budget. only thing lacking from d7200 is 4K which I really don't need and who needs swiveling screen when you can see your LCD view on your cell phone screen
Ive been waiting to upgrade from my D7000, I think I'll be choosing the D7200 now that the D7500 as been announced.
I've been shooting with a D2x and D5100 and have been considering either the 7200 or the 500 to replace my not-dead-but-dying 5100. I want the fps but would rather spend the difference on better glass. Now the 7500 comes along. Perfect timing. Mind made up, glass and 8fps will work for me.
Matt made a fair review of the camera, i come here for the comments usually, the may be constructive but a lot of people today is complaining about new tecnology like they have not enough capacity to practice, improve and get the last and best of their tools, i mean, most of us are photograpers here and it seems like we depend on the new tech to make better results instead of using our brain, creativity and technique, i feel upset because i am here to learn and find a lot of crying from people who several times only achieve sharp pictures of mediocre ideas, that is sad, gear improvements sometimes slow down our capacity to develop a better way to make photo, you can do great with "obsolete" gear.
If you look at Tony Northrups video of the d500 vs d7200. It beats it in IQ. So yes the d7500 beats the d7200. If I was at a d7200 I wouldn't get it and go straight to the d500. Though if I was going from the d3/5xxx I would move to a d7500. If more features are needed you have the d500.
I must admit, I wonder if this really is a replacement for the D7200 or whether they've tried to re-jig the product line where you go pro (D500, D5), compact and high quality (D7500) or beginner. The D7200 really sits between the D500 and the D7500 in terms of still camera features, although I do wish it had a tilty touch screen.
Nice job Matt. I love how you can break these equipment reviews into realistic and pro relative terms.
Thanks for the video. I'm thinking about pulling the trigger on a D500 and just heard about this.
1 card slot!? WTF? It's 2017...having two is standard now. I was sold on the tilt screen and bigger buffer and the price is reasonable...but I'd rather have the extra resolution (the stock image agency I shoot for won't take files under 24MP's on a crop sensor) and be able to back up to a second card while I'm shooting...so for now I'll stick with my D7100 as a back up to my FX. Actually, one of only two reasons I never jumped completely to Fuji is that they didn't have 24MP sensors and dual card slots until the new X-T2. Nikon's trying a lot harder than Canon with the new stuff I think...I like that there are lots of cameras/lenses to choose from...but they're still not wowing me like Fuji. It sounds like the D7500 is in between the D7000 series and D5000...capable for sure, but the single card slot is what kills it for me.
I have two D7000s mainly for video and still love them. The extra card slot isn't a deal breaker for me, but the older models are always much less expensive for similar tech so I'm not running out to buy this. I would love to have: the flip screen (don't know if the 7100 or 7200 have this); the ability to change aperture in live view (like the D810 - not sure if the others do this?); a lock so the mode dial doesn't slip off of "M" (I think I see this?); and most of all focus peaking, which none of the cameras seem to have. I often use an external monitor but that would be amazing. They did add zebra stripes but exposure is less of an issue for me than maintaining accurate manual focus with video.
One card slot is definitely a deal breaker for even me for whom photography is just a hobby. I currently use D7000... and use dual card slot for all my trips to have backup of my photos...
Interesting camera. I've been thinking of upgrading my D7000 to the D7200, and now this appears. Yes, Nikon dropped some D500 features, like a second card slot. I'm not sure that's a deal breaker for me. I like the fact it has a built in flash which can control the Creative Lighting System speedlights. I've got an SB800 and SB900. For video, it has clean HDMI output so you can record 4K to an external recorder. The form factor looks like it will feel better in hand. Side by side image comparisons will be nice to see when the D7500 is released.
Gerry Fraiberg Sounds like it might work for your needs, but the 7500 is definitely not an upgrade from the 7200.
No, not necessarily an upgrade but a different camera slotted in between the D7200 and the D500.
From a Canon user's point of view, I'd get this over the 80D, by far. I'm mainly a video kind of guy, and with the 4K I really think that this camera is great for my aviation hobby. To film through fences I'd need a 300mm lens, and compared to Canon or Panasonic, Nikon's 300mm lens seems to give what I need for the price. I really think this is a camera designed to convert those who'd otherwise buy something like the 80D for a combi camera.
I have the D5600, and pure gadget lust has me seeking justifications to upgrade, but I just can't find one. I don't shoot sports or birds in flight, so I don't need rocket auto focus. The D5600 is 24mp vs 20, and to upgrade to any of them, means giving up my fully articulating touch screen. The D5600 in my view, is very underrated, and a superb value for the potrait/landscape prosumer.
What a stupid move on Nikon's part to only put one card slot! I own the d500 and I absolutely love it! The iso performance on this camera is absolutely incredible!
I'm due for a new camera upgrade - to go for the rangefinder mode (e.g. Sony a6500, etc.) or retain mirrored DSLRs system (e.g. Nikon D500, etc.). I'll wait a few months for the price to stabilize and more in depth reviews from web and users I might know who will have one when it goes for retail.
Hi buddy, I've had a Sony Mirrorless after selling my nikon d7000. I love my new setup but wanted to say thank you for great videos and tips over my nikon years. Best wishes :-)
I have the D500 and the D750 and I love both of them. But for wildlife shooting I use my D500 and I love it.
I have a D7200 and love it. Been shooting it for about 6 months now with Nikon lens and Sigma and works great for all I need which is a serious amateur and also getting paid for some. Will get a full frame one of these days but not for the near future. I don't see why Nikon did some of the stuff for the 7500 I think the D7200 will be better then the 7500. But will see as it comes out cause Nikon I'm sure coming out with a replacement for the D500 and so on always moving forward hopefully
So I should buy the D7200? Got it, thanks for the help, Matt! Excellent video, as always.
Sterby jr. i have one for sale with only 1700 shots on it
Been shooting a D7000 for years now, so I'm always excited (and envious) to see what its replacement looks like. It's not like there's a chance I'd upgrade, but hell. One card slot? That's ridiculous. I don't care for wifi, bluetooth or NFC, but having two card slots in a higher end DSLR is a must. Like you said, dumbed down. Whether that's because Nikon wants to make a clear separation between the D7000 series and the D500 or not, it seems like an idiotic move. On paper it's not that much better than the D7200, so why would anyone spend more to get it?
I own the 7200 and the 500, by far the 7200 is my go to body for weight and travel size. the 500 is awesome if you can use a tripod. however, of them all, my favorite body out of my lineup including my d5 and d4x is my d3s.
I also heard and seen pictures that support that Nikon is not adding a
MB Battery Grip for this D7500?? I saw pictures of the bottom the the
D7500 that show no inputs for a battery Grip.. Can anyone else tell me
if I am right or wrong? I am sticking with my D7200 thank you very
much.. I get 2 card slots, and a battery grip. I also have 24MP
resolution.. Who cares about the flippy touch screen.. My next SLR will
be the Nikon D500. Not sure what Nikon was thinking..
I love my D7200. I'll definitely be getting the D7500. 4k and flipscreen are more important to me than a 2nd slot but I am disappointed it doesn't have a magnesium body.
I have a d7100 and I like it a lot, use it very frequently and had it for four years now and still going strong, but if I get the chance I would like to get the d500 or d810 if possible, the d7500 is not an upgrade is more for a fist time buyer of a dslr and coming from a point and shoot camera
From your pictures too, it does appear that there will be NO MB battery grip as on the D700, D7100 & the D7200.. If that is the case, it surely is a waste of an upgrade.. I skip it and keep my D7200 until it dies then move up to a D500..
Well coming from the D5100 I guess that everything is a step up.
I don't know but I feel like it worth going for a used D500 this one seems a mini version of it.
I've got the D7000, and with the shutter count getting incredibly close to 250.000 shots, I was waiting out for Nikon to announce a D7300 (which was the D7500). The single SD-slot, though, has pushed me back to probably the D7200 (one does need to work within ones budget, so not likely to go for the D500).
You don't mention in the video, but apparently the D7500 has no AI indexing for AI and AIS manual focus lenses. That's a deal breaker for me. This is clearly an extension of the 5000 line, not a proper replacement to the D7200.
what does that mean?even d5300 has this
I think I'm one of the few who is fine with this camera. Yes the naming is weird, but so was the naming of the D750 which everyone said wasn't a true successor to the D700 when it came out.
I do video professionally and I like this cameras specs and the potential to be a great B-cam or something a bit lighter and with good specs to take on location shoots.
You can complain about the 1SD card slot all you want, but the Sony A7 line still only supports one SD card slot and they have done excellent.
I think that this is a good camera, yes it has its flaws but so does every other camera and because this is the internet people pre-judge a cameras abilities and sales figures based purely by what's on paper. Wait for it to come out, get out and shoot with it in a real world situation and not charts and then form an opinion on if it's right for you or not.
This is the D3400 all over again.
Let's make the new camera worse then the previous one.
Single SD slot was a terrible idea
Dan Koester They had to differentiate it from the D500. If you need dual card slots, Nikon wants you to buy the flagship.
I'm looking for a bit better camera up from my D3500, It's lacking some important features to make Photogrametry and architectural reference photography easier. I'm not looking to spend a ton as I don't do traditional photography, I also have some decent quality DX lenses so not looking to go full frame. I was leaning towards the D7500 but it's lacking some resolution that the D7200 has, it also has a second card slot for easier backups. Should I buy the D7200?
I use a D7200 and a assorted collection Nikon 35mm film cameras… and some Mamiya medium format,
so for me it is basically Nikon and Mamiya (PhaseOne).
With them ditching the second card holder and the in camera AF-system it simply feels more like a “marketing-ploy-toy-thing”
then a legit evolution of the 7000 line of cameras.
I have the original D7000 and I think I will wait little longer and keep saving before upgrading, especially if the 7500 is what is hot right now.
Thanks Matt - Currently using the D7000 and wanted to upgrade to the D7500, but listening to your video it seems that the D7500 is a dumber down version of the D500 at half the price? As they say, the D500 (Professional Use) the D7500 for (Consumer Use)?
I am using d7500 .. I am no professional .. But enthusiast .. The reasons I preferred 7500 over the 7200, are:
1: extremely fast performance ..
2: Tilt and touch screen for weird angles ..
3: 4k recording (although not much needed but definitely it is worth consideration)
But no doubt I hated single card slot option as much as any other has hated it .. I only wished it has 2 card slots ..
But the bright side is that I got a 3 months used d7500* camera with Shutter Count less than 1500 .. Barely used in 2 wedding functions by the previous owner .. 9 months official warranty remaining (In Pakistan, official warranty is limited to 1 year only) .. Worth 100000 Pakistani Rupees almost 820 US Dollars .. While the price of a new d7200* is well above 120000 new and around 100000 used (warranty over and shutter count above 15000 to 20000) .. So I think what I got is a fair deal ...
* with the Nikorr 18-140 f3.5 VR lens ..
D7500 is most underrated camera of nikon. There are lots of pros when compared to D7200. I would like to get it but price is setting me back 🙂
I started with a D3300 and then got the D7200, I use the dual slots not as backup but for continuity writing. I can't find a reason to upgrade to the D7500 but If I still had the D3300 I think I'll go for the 7500 instead of the 7200. That said, weight and the grip is the only thing I complain about my D7200.
I think you forgot to and this one : D7500 not be able to mount AIS lens :-((((
The upgrades both Nikon and Cannon are making to their new cameras are so insignificant there is no reason to upgrade from the older models and don't justify the outrageous prices. I got a used D7100 for 400$ more than 2 years ago and see no reason at all to pay 3 times that for the minor improvements the D7500 brings. Getting the D7500 might make sense for someone new to photography but even then, the outlandish price would drive a lot of people away to cheaper alternatives or to the used market.
Got the D3200 when it first came out. I shoot families, landscape, and engagement sessions. ITS TIME TO UPGRADE! I wanted the d7200, then 7500 came out, should I just suck it up till I can get a d500? Duel card slot is a big loss and so is the ability to place a battery grip on the d7500.
good review Matt. also no joystick I believe. I won't be swapping my D500. where is the D750 and D810 replacemebt.
Who do you think this is aimed at? Its fast, lightweight, less battery life and a mix of latest gen and last gen tech... Vloggers who want a lighter 4k camera? Hikers and birders willing to trade weight for the advantages of the D500??
I think Nikon failed with this camera. There's no point in upgrading from a D7100/D7200. The only good things over those are the sensor and the buffer.
EDIT: and the tilty screen.
I think it's there to complete against the Canon 80D, pretty much.
And live view auto fine tune feature.
Its so odd, neither hikers or birders would probably be willing to go with 1 card slot only.
If I imagine myself hiking out and having an issue with a card and possibly lose the whole trip, wow what a downer.
This just makes no sense that such a camera has no dual card slot.
I got the D7200 and was looking forward to this, but like you said its not a follow up, it seems it got lost in the middle of nowhere.
I think the lack of that backup card slot is a huge issue for anyone wanting to upgrade to the prosumer level. Also, write speeds of relatively inexpensive RAM is now low enough that it should be relatively cheap / easy to include a buffer capable of holding far in excess of a few hundred shots.