Want more of your favourite moments from Chicago P.D.? Check out our Chicago playlist here - ua-cam.com/play/PLPJF0-2l0r5V51hbGd16OSgYr8VzRBL-X.html Subscribe to PD TV here for classic moments from the best TV Police dramas - ua-cam.com/channels/cfJ9wYielnEqrZWFNsNFBA.htmlfeatured
@@jakemcnulty They explained it fine. Two things. I think Platt just wanted them to drop it and they obeyed the letter of her order but not the spirit.
@@darkshogun5887 they pursued it when she said take it to homicide. the disobeyed a direct order. then they went to the ladies house and started asking questions. which they werent suppose to do.
Great way to offload questionably functional crap guns for a profit. Some of them attract people from out of town/state if the price is high enough above the actual fair value of certain guns. Mainly just captures a lot of junk that was never going to be used in a crime anyway. An actual decent handgun or AR sells for way more than they offer, so why would you turn it in instead of just selling it to a gun store?
Omg me to…waving unknown firearms around like they’ve never touched a gun in their lives….actually…the more I think about it, the more convincing I find the acting to be…
@@gh0st_240 they didn't ask a single question. They went there and exchanged the gift card for the other one. She mentioned the gun bottle all on her own.
No, actual Chicago would get the charges dismissed from the killer and then *charge the officers* for interfering in an "investigation." That's the CHICAGO way!
@@fhfs Bullshit. They just solved a homicide case that the department had previously fumbled and got the perp convicted. That did far more help than the gun buy-back scheme.
I loved it when a pro gun group in Illinois collected old worn out guns from all over the state, turned them in for a bunch of money and used that to fund their summer shooting sports camp
"We, in fact, did not make a single statement ending in a question mark" lol! I love me some Burgess! And I have a love-hate relationship with Platt but she does always have their back when she needs to!
@@matthewsnoogans4693 my point was that the way it's said can be seen as a question and it also can be seen as not a question it's all about who you're talking to, some people might not interpret that as a question, or they will but probably just seen as curiosity as a part of small talk. Well it doesn't really matter tho.
While I get what Platt was coming from... The rebuttal would have been 'Ok, so if I went n shot a bunch of people and escaped, then sold the gun during a buyback... then that evidence is just gone and nothing can tie me to it?'
@@jordanwardle11 It's a wonky situation either way. Tho I feel like the no questions asked is what should change. Even if it's a name/phone number/ID check. That way, if a gun does come back as used in a crime, they can be tracked.
I feel like there are two scenarios here. The police should not be able to justify an investigation with something they obtained during a "no questions asked" buyback. But if evidence of a crime tracks back to a gun they confiscated they should be able to use the gun in court. This would at least give a bit of trust to those gun buybacks while also not just giving criminals a way to "dispose" of evidence.
"If we lose that trust, guns don't come off the street." There are about 433.9 million guns in the United States, and around 140 million of those are owned by the public. Guns are never coming off the street.
Bro no one is actually doing that. The buy back is for regular people living regular lives who stumble on loose guns in the streets, or for regular people living regular lives who feel like they dont need a gun anymore. No mf in the streets would voluntarily sell a gun they spent thousands for, especially with all these makeshift switches and attachments. Guns are stupid but lets put thousands on them to give back to the streets 🤷🏽♂️
They used to do this stuff and the guns for sneakers programs all the time in my old hood. We used to just laugh at it. The few people who would bring anything were parents and old people with old and mostly legal guns. No one was stupid enough to exchange street burners with the police.
That’s how every single buy back goes, the criminals with the switches keep their weapons and the law abiding citizens who only planned on using the gun in case of self defense and protecting family is the one who has to suffer and make themselves defenseless
@@DyegoPC1995 Network shows like this are extremely generic with the lowest tier writers in the business. It's very rare you'll get any real talent on these kinds of shows. They're basically all cookie cutter. Chicago blue, Chicago fire, NYPD blue, Boston PD etc etc they're basically all the same generic show.
I hate how people think that making law abiding citizens give up their guns will stop crime. Criminals won't turn in their guns, for obvious reasons, so crime won't go down
No one is buying a gun for $50. And certainly not for a $50 gift card to a grocery store, lmao. "Hey boss, lemme get that Glock. Here's a gift card to WalMart."
@@Fisheee123 How many crimes are committed with guns just lying around a home? Not every crime with a gun involved a hardened criminal who wouldn't be turning over their weapons. Would this stop all crime? No. Would it prevent some crimes or a accident? Sure.
@@cww2490 Lol wut, only idiots turn their guns in at a Gun buy back. If you had a gun lying around at home and wanted money for it, you'd sell the firearm to an actual guns store for actual market value
I cannot think of any rules that they have broken and yet they help break a case and get suspended basically for the evening that is just downright wrong very disappointing I hope our law enforcement nowadays do not do that
"Leading the witness." And you don't need to have a questioning tone to ask a question and receive an answer. Filling in the blanks or appearing ignorant is the same thing. The hurdles that people here and police go to avoid the strictest definition of wrongdoing is precisely why the sergeant is mad. It destroys trust and she is thinking big picture..
@@corkscrewpikachu2730 That's a textbook example of a strawman argument. Violation of public trust in a social program vs a murderer are 2 totally different problems. It's easy to justify doing ANYTHING when the comparison is a triple homicide.
Technically they didn't break any rules but their Sergeant wanted them to drop it as to not endanger the gun buyback program. If that lady went to her neighbors and said cops questioned her or even talked to her about a gun she turned in people would be hesitant to participate in the buyback program.
@@corkscrewpikachu2730 The reason those homicides happened in the first place is because of guns being out and people being too mistrustful of the police to turn the guns in or have any faith in them at all. Likely sabotaging that trust just to nab a single murderer is a drop in the bucket compared to who COULD have been saved by instead getting more guns out of circulation and building more trust with the community so people come forward more in the future.
Man,... this shows how good cops get thrown under the bus by an ignorant Chief or lieutenant. That's messed up. That was crazy when she said: the both of you Go home... hahaha
That sergeant is the exact reason why things don’t get done murders don’t get solved people don’t get justice and the cops that have to serve under them get so jaded and bitter because people like her won’t allow them to do their jobs
there is more at stake here. the fact is that Chicago has a LOT of homicides, and will have more in the future. the gun buy-back program is a goal to reduce the number of the homicides in the future. solving 1 case isn't going to stop future homicides as much as reducing the amount of guns on the streets. while the success of the gun buy-back program can be called into question, they cannot lose the trust of the community just to try to solve 1 case. it's simply not a good business model. Polive is a business, just like anything else, they just deal in order rather than common goods.
Move to Chicago, I lived there 20 years, The criminals have more rights than the citizens! Thanks Alien Lightfoot, oh, she is gone now, but it will be all the same! 😅 Living in the South now is Heaven!
Do you really think they work? Seriously? No criminal will EVER sell their gun, lol. It' their tool. The only people that will show up are those poor suckers who buy into the whole "guns are bad not the people handling them", bandwagon.
How does one (like a government) “buy back” something they *never owned* to begin with? And to “buy” something suggests that there’s at least an equal exchange between two wholly consenting and aware parties. I’m pretty sure a Glock and a Walmart gift card aren’t close in price at all. Lol
It's a market like eBay. Someone sets a price for an item. If someone is willing to they take that price. It's not complicated. It's equal in the eye of the buyer and the seller that's all
@Ben Not in the case of a buyback though. This one seems voluntary, but the ones they are trying to do now are pretty much " Take this price or we take it from you by force
@@Ben-fx9kx Going off of the history of places that enacted similar ordinances, they start raiding and killing those violators. I pray to God that don't happen here. But it's smart to be prepared
@@respondcommander9332 By all means let them start raiding gun owner's homes, but I don't want to hear police dept. cry when their orders for american flags and life insurance skyrocket due to all the "fallen brothers" they end up having.
"I just saw a tumble-weed." that's honestly kewl!!! Timestamp is 0:00 :) also, what color was it? I'm pretty sure they are usually brown, but, anyway :)
I wish CPD was not so understaffed and stretched thin with an overabundance of crime. Officers could actually do their jobs like this. Also the bureaucracy, beetlejuice has only made this cioty worse. Say what you will about Daley or Emmanuel, they were corrupt but not stupid.
"We literally did not make a single statement that ended in a question mark." *30 Seconds Earlier* "Do you think we could maybe come in and exchange it for the other one?" "Know what was weird about that puppy?" How are writers this bad?
@@gokuandmario4ever and what if they were wrong or worst what if they found evidence that leads to a killer but because they didn't do it by the book the gun and evidence are thrown out in court. they disobeyed a direct order, found a woman that dropped off a gun into a no questions asked buyback program and then they both lied to the woman on why they were there. and trying to do what they felt was right is a lousy excuse because the same excuse can and is used by people who do horrible things. not saying what they did is horrible, just saying doing something because it feels right doesn't make it right also, before someone comes in and says it. yes, i get it's a show so it isn't real but showing the consequences of doing things the wrong way is important to anyone who takes inspiration or looks up to these characters
Want more of your favourite moments from Chicago P.D.? Check out our Chicago playlist here - ua-cam.com/play/PLPJF0-2l0r5V51hbGd16OSgYr8VzRBL-X.html
Subscribe to PD TV here for classic moments from the best TV Police dramas - ua-cam.com/channels/cfJ9wYielnEqrZWFNsNFBA.htmlfeatured
This was actually on TV lol glad I dont watch TV
Technically, they didn’t actually break any rules. They just had a conversation with the lady that led to solving a case
True, but they didn’t explain it to Platt clearly enough. If they had, she would’ve understood they didn’t break any rules
@@jakemcnulty Seemed like they explained it just fine to me
@@jakemcnulty They explained it fine. Two things. I think Platt just wanted them to drop it and they obeyed the letter of her order but not the spirit.
the did by asking the lady questions then they went to the ladies house. the said fk what they were told.
@@darkshogun5887 they pursued it when she said take it to homicide. the disobeyed a direct order. then they went to the ladies house and started asking questions. which they werent suppose to do.
The most unrealistic part of this is that a gun buyback actually did something significant
The kid coming with a BB gun was funnytho
Is it though? Australia had a gun buyback in 1996 and how many mass shootings has the country had since? 0
Great way to offload questionably functional crap guns for a profit. Some of them attract people from out of town/state if the price is high enough above the actual fair value of certain guns.
Mainly just captures a lot of junk that was never going to be used in a crime anyway. An actual decent handgun or AR sells for way more than they offer, so why would you turn it in instead of just selling it to a gun store?
Naw I get some good deals at gun buyback programs 😂
@@ihatecheese623 that was the most realistic part
The absolute lack of muzzle discipline is driving me insane
Yep. That and yanking a gun out of a pocket or bag in front of cops
liberals wrote this show. you think they understand a single thing about muzzle discipline?
Omg me to…waving unknown firearms around like they’ve never touched a gun in their lives….actually…the more I think about it, the more convincing I find the acting to be…
That's very realistic for the cops.
And handling it nonstop with gloves.
"We maintain trust with the community"
Gotta love the realism with these shows.
They didn't break any rules. They never mentioned anything about a homicide case to the lady.
they went and asked questions. which they werent suppose to do. they were told to hand it over to hoimicide. which they didnt do.
@@marshmelo15 they didn’t ask a single question
@@gh0st_240 they didn't ask a single question. They went there and exchanged the gift card for the other one. She mentioned the gun bottle all on her own.
@GH0ST_ dude what rewatch the video lol they didn’t ask the woman a single question or bring up the crime
@GH0ST_ WATCH THE VIDEO
I don’t watch the show, but this older woman trying to stop positive progress sounds exactly what Chicago leadership would do
No their playing with kerosene soaked matches that could've easily blown up in their face and the entire department.
Still waiting for the FBI Corruption Task Force to be added to the series. No hope in sight.
No, actual Chicago would get the charges dismissed from the killer and then *charge the officers* for interfering in an "investigation." That's the CHICAGO way!
@@RobinDale50Nope.
@@fhfs Bullshit. They just solved a homicide case that the department had previously fumbled and got the perp convicted. That did far more help than the gun buy-back scheme.
My dad witnessed a gun back program where people were buying guns off of other people more than the police got.
There was also one someone 3d printed 50 of them lmfao, brought em in and got like 10k.
😂
Seeing clips from earlier seasons makes me realize how much I miss the patrol aspect of the show
Same. The show is an empty shell of itself now.
@@LotsofLisa What is it like now? Never watched it except for this clip
@@icarus2k Chicago PD
@@DevonteM317 I mean what is the show like? How has it changed from this video?
Yeah, should have kept Roman or filled his spot with another patrol officer.
“I just saw a tumble weed” haha 😂 😅that got me
I loved it when a pro gun group in Illinois collected old worn out guns from all over the state, turned them in for a bunch of money and used that to fund their summer shooting sports camp
Hey that's a good way to make money of old guns that probably don't work.
Seconded
Rules or not, they didn't break the trust of the community which is all that lady seemed worried about.
"We, in fact, did not make a single statement ending in a question mark" lol! I love me some Burgess! And I have a love-hate relationship with Platt but she does always have their back when she needs to!
3:57 "Do you know what's weird about that puppy?"
@@JinKee because he just said it right after that instead of waiting for her to say something, it's meant as more of a statement than a question.
@@meng_jan "Can we come inside and exchange this for the other one?"
The policy was No questions asked, not Some questions asked
@@matthewsnoogans4693 my point was that the way it's said can be seen as a question and it also can be seen as not a question it's all about who you're talking to, some people might not interpret that as a question, or they will but probably just seen as curiosity as a part of small talk. Well it doesn't really matter tho.
@Meng_梦 "Can we come inside and exchange it for the other one?" is a question. There's no disputing that, its not open for interpretation.
The only thing she did was write down a license plate, but look at how smug her face is when he explaining the case lol
Imagine selling your firearms back to a government agency 💀💀💀
for $50 no less💀💀💀
could sell my handgun tomorrow for $1000 all day.
@@user-pn3im5sm7kwhat u got?
@@j18397 Colt 70 series 1911
the first step to an Orwellian Society
@@natemorrow2911 lol Americans are delusional on guns
While I get what Platt was coming from... The rebuttal would have been 'Ok, so if I went n shot a bunch of people and escaped, then sold the gun during a buyback... then that evidence is just gone and nothing can tie me to it?'
What's the alternative? Detain everyone who brings a gun and interrogate them? Then no one would come and the gun would still be on them.
@@jordanwardle11 It's a wonky situation either way. Tho I feel like the no questions asked is what should change. Even if it's a name/phone number/ID check. That way, if a gun does come back as used in a crime, they can be tracked.
I feel like there are two scenarios here.
The police should not be able to justify an investigation with something they obtained during a "no questions asked" buyback.
But if evidence of a crime tracks back to a gun they confiscated they should be able to use the gun in court.
This would at least give a bit of trust to those gun buybacks while also not just giving criminals a way to "dispose" of evidence.
"If we lose that trust, guns don't come off the street."
There are about 433.9 million guns in the United States, and around 140 million of those are owned by the public. Guns are never coming off the street.
Hi five
You can’t “buy back” something you never owned 😅
Imagine selling your $400 handgun for a measly $20 and some McDonald's coupons back to the government 💀😭
It's not selling "back to the government" the government didn't buy them, the government didn't sell them
I think it’s to sell unregistered and illegal guns get them of the street idk
Why would you want me to imagine such horror?
Bro no one is actually doing that. The buy back is for regular people living regular lives who stumble on loose guns in the streets, or for regular people living regular lives who feel like they dont need a gun anymore. No mf in the streets would voluntarily sell a gun they spent thousands for, especially with all these makeshift switches and attachments. Guns are stupid but lets put thousands on them to give back to the streets 🤷🏽♂️
What handgun is $400 anymore? Well-used 6-10 year old police trade in Glocks are going for $450.
They used to do this stuff and the guns for sneakers programs all the time in my old hood. We used to just laugh at it. The few people who would bring anything were parents and old people with old and mostly legal guns. No one was stupid enough to exchange street burners with the police.
That's been the results for all gun buybacks.
Mostly old single shot rifles and guns found in some dead guys attic.
That’s how every single buy back goes, the criminals with the switches keep their weapons and the law abiding citizens who only planned on using the gun in case of self defense and protecting family is the one who has to suffer and make themselves defenseless
That Sgt makes total sense as they don’t like arresting criminals in Chicago anymore
This is a perfect example why you gotta defend yourself now a day, can't rely on police departments cause they literally get shut down like this video
Especially ppl of color gotta look out for themselves now due to how police officers murdered and got away with it
They don't this is just weirdo blue line propaganda
I always forget this is the same universe as Chicago Fire
And Chicago Med
And Chicago pd
yo turn in your gun😂😂😂no questions asked😂😂😂
This is where you sell them HiPoints and get lots of money lmao.
who needs high points? pipe and wood counts at these idiotic things.
Sergeant Platt : “ no questions asked”
Burgess: “ You know that's a BB gun right?”
Roman: “ what do got for us?”
In real life,that boy would have gotten shot the way he pulled that gun from his pocket...
Not when you put it on the table.
The other boy aimed a gun at the cops is why they opened fire.
@@robertdeffenbaugh9004 I said the way he drew it from his pocket would have prompted a reflex from officers,be safe
Based
@@gtaambassador744 Have to agree with you
@Tylerrr324 ha,yeah 😅
Idk what's more baffling, the fact that people watch this show, or the fact that anyone would give away their guns in Chicago
Yea this show decides to leave out a lot of the actual causes of violence in this city
Disarm criminals not law abiding citizens guns.
Just curious, never seen the show except for this clip and think its ok for TV, but honestly Why do you believe its a bad show?
@@DyegoPC1995 Network shows like this are extremely generic with the lowest tier writers in the business. It's very rare you'll get any real talent on these kinds of shows. They're basically all cookie cutter. Chicago blue, Chicago fire, NYPD blue, Boston PD etc etc they're basically all the same generic show.
Why do they even have her on the show?
Ah yes gun buy backs where often non working, stolen or homemade guns that cost a few dollars in material are unloaded so working guns are bought.
At least it’s something
I hate how people think that making law abiding citizens give up their guns will stop crime. Criminals won't turn in their guns, for obvious reasons, so crime won't go down
No one is buying a gun for $50. And certainly not for a $50 gift card to a grocery store, lmao.
"Hey boss, lemme get that Glock. Here's a gift card to WalMart."
@@Fisheee123 How many crimes are committed with guns just lying around a home? Not every crime with a gun involved a hardened criminal who wouldn't be turning over their weapons.
Would this stop all crime? No. Would it prevent some crimes or a accident? Sure.
@@cww2490 Lol wut, only idiots turn their guns in at a Gun buy back. If you had a gun lying around at home and wanted money for it, you'd sell the firearm to an actual guns store for actual market value
Gun Buybacks are one of the most ridiculous things ever
So you’re for dangerous weapons ending up in the wrong hands?
@@joewhitehead3 of course you're that one guy who has to go there
@@MasterVideoStudios Well Am I wrong?
@@joewhitehead3 yes you are
@@MasterVideoStudios About?
I laughed for an hour when she said “the science fair was the next week” 😂
The Sargeant is the reason crimes don't get solved.
Ah yes, the old treat everyone as a criminal so that you can solve all the crimes. Makes perfect sense.
Them boots must taste real good , huh?
@@jordanwardle11 They are criminals.
Sergeant
The question is, is the sergeant right? If you break no questions asked, does it solve more or cost you more in the long run?
They should've had body cams and recorded what the Sergeant said to them and see what the public think, and if she gets fired. 🤔
one of my fav. tv shows,everyone needs a friend like voight.
The chief is protecting the guy.
The Sergeant isn't protecting the murderer she's protecting the gun buyback program that gets guns off the streets.
I've only seen two clips of this show, and so far all I see is that the Sergeant is *VERY* bad at her job.
Lol at the prices. That's never going to work 🤣
Omg can she be fired already that woman is a huge jerk 5:20
I cannot think of any rules that they have broken and yet they help break a case and get suspended basically for the evening that is just downright wrong very disappointing I hope our law enforcement nowadays do not do that
"Leading the witness." And you don't need to have a questioning tone to ask a question and receive an answer. Filling in the blanks or appearing ignorant is the same thing. The hurdles that people here and police go to avoid the strictest definition of wrongdoing is precisely why the sergeant is mad. It destroys trust and she is thinking big picture..
Loopholes versus triple homicide. I think I would take cops who find loopholes than a guy who killed 3 people still being on the street.
@@corkscrewpikachu2730 That's a textbook example of a strawman argument. Violation of public trust in a social program vs a murderer are 2 totally different problems. It's easy to justify doing ANYTHING when the comparison is a triple homicide.
Technically they didn't break any rules but their Sergeant wanted them to drop it as to not endanger the gun buyback program. If that lady went to her neighbors and said cops questioned her or even talked to her about a gun she turned in people would be hesitant to participate in the buyback program.
@@corkscrewpikachu2730 The reason those homicides happened in the first place is because of guns being out and people being too mistrustful of the police to turn the guns in or have any faith in them at all.
Likely sabotaging that trust just to nab a single murderer is a drop in the bucket compared to who COULD have been saved by instead getting more guns out of circulation and building more trust with the community so people come forward more in the future.
People who are willing to sacrfice their freedoms are easily manipulated.
Man,... this shows how good cops get thrown under the bus by an ignorant Chief or lieutenant. That's messed up. That was crazy when she said: the both of you Go home... hahaha
That sergeant is the exact reason why things don’t get done murders don’t get solved people don’t get justice and the cops that have to serve under them get so jaded and bitter because people like her won’t allow them to do their jobs
there is more at stake here. the fact is that Chicago has a LOT of homicides, and will have more in the future. the gun buy-back program is a goal to reduce the number of the homicides in the future. solving 1 case isn't going to stop future homicides as much as reducing the amount of guns on the streets. while the success of the gun buy-back program can be called into question, they cannot lose the trust of the community just to try to solve 1 case. it's simply not a good business model. Polive is a business, just like anything else, they just deal in order rather than common goods.
Trudy Platt: “no questions asked”
Kim: “You know that's a BB gun right?”
Platt: Do you know what no “questions asked” means?!
Change out go home
Keep Calm and Carry on.
Which season and episode is this one?
I clicked because of the lady cop. Good job UA-cam for that
Lol at her face in the thumbnail, she’s like “bitch please, I’m the total package” 😂
And
Desk SGT is my favorite person in this whole series
What episode is this?
digging throughg the dumpster no ppe in chicago is wild
Move to Chicago, I lived there 20 years, The criminals have more rights than the citizens! Thanks Alien Lightfoot, oh, she is gone now, but it will be all the same! 😅 Living in the South now is Heaven!
😂😂😂😂😂😂 that too in Chicago
Almost as good as the free television prize for winning the contest that they did not enter to bring those warrant scofflaws in the easy way.
This Sergeant is the worst. She's definitely Chicago police material.
3:04 just "float" the gun to homicide hahaha
If I were the chief, I would promote them bothe for doing this
Why? That just leads to more police power trips
Good ideas
Great job
🙏
Well, the gun is no good now since you were handling it with your bare hands, that's like crime 101. Even the lady that brought it to you knew that.
No good deed goes unpunished
Disobedience from a DIRECT ORDER. What a boot 🥾
They need to explain it to Hank, he will update Platt and all is good. good clip!
Super realistic! Cops who don’t know the law 😂
BB guns are toys not guns 😂
I just realized, the young man didn’t say Thank You. Please and Thank You goes a long way.
How can you "buy back" something you never owned?
Now his prints all over the gun.,really smart 🤓
Getting guns off the street is more important than catching a murderer.
Politics.
Lady called it "The Jewels" - she a real Chicago local.
"Do you know what's weird about that puppy?"
The whole point of the program is to stop multiple future crimes, not solve a single past crime.
Do you really think they work? Seriously?
No criminal will EVER sell their gun, lol. It' their tool.
The only people that will show up are those poor suckers who buy into the whole "guns are bad not the people handling them", bandwagon.
@@axelfoley1406umm, guns *are* bad…not one single normal healthy nation has guns available to civilians, obviously… 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
Roman played in an episode of Law & Order SVU
It’s a gun ain’t it 😂
Tec 9 is a street sweeper? Wrong! The 12 shot demon is op
They did not ask a single question related to the homicide. No rules were broken
No gloves 💀 10/10 police work
Sadly they ended losing their jobs at the end that led to the series finale.
Yes Trudy may have ashort fuse at some moments but the agents love breaking rules very much too.
How does one (like a government) “buy back” something they *never owned* to begin with? And to “buy” something suggests that there’s at least an equal exchange between two wholly consenting and aware parties.
I’m pretty sure a Glock and a Walmart gift card aren’t close in price at all. Lol
It's a market like eBay. Someone sets a price for an item. If someone is willing to they take that price. It's not complicated. It's equal in the eye of the buyer and the seller that's all
@Ben Not in the case of a buyback though. This one seems voluntary, but the ones they are trying to do now are pretty much " Take this price or we take it from you by force
@@respondcommander9332 really? Haven't really heard much about that. What's the "else" though? As in or else they'll do what?
@@Ben-fx9kx Going off of the history of places that enacted similar ordinances, they start raiding and killing those violators. I pray to God that don't happen here. But it's smart to be prepared
@@respondcommander9332 By all means let them start raiding gun owner's homes, but I don't want to hear police dept. cry when their orders for american flags and life insurance skyrocket due to all the "fallen brothers" they end up having.
I'm sure no one cares, but I am making ravioli of anyone wants some
i am so high right now i would love some.
@@hardwirecars You got it!
😂 gun buy back….only in states like this smh
The Washington commanders need a program like that
It's amazing how many people would bend over and drop pants for the cops if they asked
"I just saw a tumble-weed." that's honestly kewl!!! Timestamp is 0:00 :) also, what color was it? I'm pretty sure they are usually brown, but, anyway :)
How is gun buy backs even legal, like it how dare you give my taxes back for my property
For everyone asking, it’s from Chicago pd, gun is assumed to be connected to a triple homicide
“It’s a gun, ain’t it?”
No no, he’s got a point.
Burgess dont wanna smell stinky in patrol
What a horrible cop. She'd rather a guy who killed 3 people walk free than to let good cops be good cops.
How does govt "buy back" something it never bought or sold in the first place?
Wow, refusing to solve an actual crime in favor of a silly buyback program
0:36 I know it’s a Show but this looked like he was about to take out the Gun and Start Shooting
I wish CPD was not so understaffed and stretched thin with an overabundance of crime. Officers could actually do their jobs like this. Also the bureaucracy, beetlejuice has only made this cioty worse. Say what you will about Daley or Emmanuel, they were corrupt but not stupid.
"We literally did not make a single statement that ended in a question mark."
*30 Seconds Earlier*
"Do you think we could maybe come in and exchange it for the other one?"
"Know what was weird about that puppy?"
How are writers this bad?
No way thats on western and 61 lol
Gun buyback in Chicago 🤣🤣🤣
yes finally we see main characters getting into trouble for the crap pulled
@@gokuandmario4ever and what if they were wrong or worst what if they found evidence that leads to a killer but because they didn't do it by the book the gun and evidence are thrown out in court. they disobeyed a direct order, found a woman that dropped off a gun into a no questions asked buyback program and then they both lied to the woman on why they were there.
and trying to do what they felt was right is a lousy excuse because the same excuse can and is used by people who do horrible things. not saying what they did is horrible, just saying doing something because it feels right doesn't make it right
also, before someone comes in and says it. yes, i get it's a show so it isn't real but showing the consequences of doing things the wrong way is important to anyone who takes inspiration or looks up to these characters
@@gokuandmario4ever buybacks aren't the right thing to do
I use live 5 blocks away from where they filmed this scene
I know it’s just tv but gun buybacks don’t work anyways lol
Don't rile up Trudy!!!!!!
Keeping Law & Order in 21st Century USA.
You gotta love Trudy!