Locke versus Leibniz on innate ideas

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
  • Richard Hammerud explains the between Locke and Leibniz on innate ideas.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @dimsim-youtube
    @dimsim-youtube 3 місяці тому

    thanks, I just started reading Locke's Essay on Understanding, and all he talks about for whole chapters is these assumptions about innate ideas, without mentioning who were the champions of this innate ideas idea, the idea he was trying to disprove.

  • @fizaabdulsalem7968
    @fizaabdulsalem7968 4 роки тому +7

    Thank you so much I have learnt a lot from this video which will help me a lot in my philosophy essay.

  • @maskedtrash
    @maskedtrash Рік тому

    Saving my life, I have finals next week and this is really helpful

  • @RandomWildd
    @RandomWildd 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for posting, very informational and has left me with lots to consider. Thank you and please keep it up!

  • @amandankosi9745
    @amandankosi9745 Рік тому

    well explained

  • @jackie9417
    @jackie9417 2 роки тому

    great analysis

  • @andreamaloney3758
    @andreamaloney3758 2 роки тому +1

    Gréât vidéo thank you 🙏

  • @dimsim-youtube
    @dimsim-youtube 3 місяці тому

    whether things like language are innate, I think Locke would say, sure there are innate things like capacity to learn language, but that is not an example of an idea (although the idea we have about that capacity may be an idea, of course, but certainly that is not innate... the infant does not sit expecting to learn a language or pondering about it)