Flat Earth Proven by Triangles!!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 жов 2016
- Flat earthers think it's so easy to pull out mathematical evidence of the sun's distance to the earth. So easy, in fact, that they believe equilateral triangles not only prove a nearby sun, but also disprove the globe earth. Professor Stick shall tackle this topic.
Support me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=3308388
Follow me on Twitter: / stickprofessor
Join us on Discord: / discord
Original Video: • New Proof of a Flat Ea...
♫ Sub Warriors by DOCTOR VOX
/ doctorvoxofficial
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
watching this woman is painful..
Ithinkwithmydick thats obviously why you talk out of your ass
Even listening. Hurts my ears.
What was she on?
It was also painful to listen to her sigh and moan
truly
MTV needs to make a reality tv show where flat earthers try to find the end of the eart
Unstable Games now that's a reality tv show I'd surely watch
Naw, just have them do a reality show where Flat Earthers are rounded up and taken into orbit in such a way that they can see the entire journey through windows from ground to orbit and back to show them the truth and then dropped off at a film studio somewhere to be interviewed about their experience. TAH DAH! No more Flat Earthers! They either grow a brain and abandon their stupidity or they commit suicide because they were proven wrong and can't let go of their stupidity.
Leathurkatt They would say it was fake, projections, holograms, etc, etc.
A better idea would be to send a group of flattards on different expeditions that prove the earth is round, then watch them scramble to rationalize how they are being deceived. They could be sent to the south pole, or on a trip around Antarctica, or even into space on a Soyuz spacecraft.
The fact that such a dullardly person believes the world is flat is excellent evidence that it is not.
Imagine 7 billion microbes living on a marble, and some of them are saying that they actually live on a frisbee
More like a Tiddlywink. Gotta keep the scale right.
i once dated a girl like the one in the video.
been single for over 4 years ever since i dumped her and will stay single for another decade or so.
Damn
The meaning to life the universe and everything.
That's a you problem
F
me too. I dumped her so damn fast I nearly matched the speed of light.
*says Wikipedia is fake*
*uses Wikipedia to prove point*
Of course! Everyone knows NASA pays Wikipedia to tell lies.
@@jtgdyt2 sure...
woosh
@@WarbGames oof for me
Sugárzó Palacsinta yes a whoosh for you
I hate how she uses classical music in her videos... Mozart is rolling in his grave, her valley girl voice and sub 80 IQ ramblings should not have anything to do with masterpieces.
Prod. Cxugh Drxp nah
Freedom! Why bother with a doctor? You've got a faith healer!
Sub 0
@@urshitsux given that he had a shit fetish, you are technically correct
Proud Titanic Denier 80??? Don’t you think you’re being a bit generous?
Her videos are actually really awesome, you just have to turn the sound off
Oof
I love how it took 9 months for some one to respond to this comment
Actually, turn the sound on but your brain off. Watching this with brain on is just a torture. (Except if you're masochist)
no actually it’s not for deaf people/lip readers. in that case they can just close their eyes so it’s only if you have no way of knowing she even _exists_ for it to be good. so basically don’t watch her vids
Play the magic roundabout theme in the background.
“A shell on the back of the sun would be pretty ridiculous and contradictory to all observations we have.”
A flat Earth would be pretty ridiculous and contradictory to all observations we have, so if they are going to say that the Earth is flat, they might as well just say that there is a shell on the back of the sun.
Just watched a SciManDan video today where he shows a person who believes they found the back of the sun on a web cam in Antarctica. The part that doesn't shine....so yeah.
@@MidnightSky1821 If you could show me a link to that video i would love to see it. It would make my day!
@@justeenilingueeni123 I'll dig. It'll take me a while.
@@justeenilingueeni123 Here you go. ua-cam.com/video/mrpt5roYwlI/v-deo.html
@@MidnightSky1821 he did a great job proving a sphere XD
My school had a flat earth society, we acted like it was flat, but even the loudest speaking people in the society, treated it as a joke
Ryan Leifer "We were just being ironic" lmao
There’s your reason
I want to be in that club for some reason.
Ryan Leifer it is a joke the earth is round
My friends and I have been wanting to create a club for a while now. We wanted to create the stupidest club possible. The only requirement is that se need 10 members and 1 teacher to agree with it, (the teach would be responsible for us during meetings) and I'm going to propose a flat earth club to them tomorrow!
I forgot the name of your channel, and I didn't want to go through my 200+ subscriptions to find you, so I literally searched up 'Stick Science' and I found you.
Hell yeah. :P
Why so many subscriptions? I for example have like 15 and always unsub from people, I dont have time to watch/I don't watch their content anymore.
DangWeb you probably spend less time on youtube than he does
Bruh, I just like when everything is clean. I spend on yt my whole life. Like I am lazy to game, do something else, I just sit in yt for like average 12h a day atleast for 4 years now.
Oups, when I wrote about 15 subs, It was a guess. Just checked and I have 51 subs xd
if sun was that close like 6654 kilometers WE DEAD SON
There would surely be no earth if that would be so
Yeah I wouldn't be able to get the marshmallowz out fast enough (Fried)
Mate we'd literally be lava XD
@@parththegr8 lol
Just wait another 5.5 Billion Years.
Google maps/earth should make on 1 april the world like a disk xD
they could a a permanent flat earth mode, and let them use the unreliable map until they conclude by themselves it is not working
@Tiagorpg mendes
bUt ThE mAp IsNt DeVeLoPeD yEt!1!1!1!!!1
Its super hot in her room because the sun is too close to her room.
so hot until it melts down her brain
O man you right
well that made her brain cells burn up
I cried I laughed so hard
he ha, good one
Ironically, I think her argument proves that the earth has to be round.
Daniel Pitts exactly. I think if this is her original idea, she should have known it herself.
I came rushing to the comment section hoping I was the first to say that
WTF, are you adhering to facts and data???
Where is the emotional factor?
Exactly what I thought
Daniel Pitts You are right, but she would still get the wrong distance with that observations. I run HER numbres.
She claims that the observers are 6654km appart. With an earth radius of 6371km, they form a triangle with a 59.886° angle at earth center. The chord would be 6360km. Since the observer is looking up 60° the angle to the earth radius is 90+60. Since the inner angles of a diamond add up to 360°, the angle made up from observer a - sun - observer b is 0.16°
The sun, observer a and the middle of the chord form a right triangle. The angle at the sun is 0.16/2=0.08°.
Going by those numbres the distance between the observer and the sun (Hypothenuse) would be 4.555 Million km.
She needs three hours to make minute rice...
😂😂😂
She would cancel a doctors appointment because she’s sick.
Ironically, we can use geometry to prove the Earth is spherical:
1. Start at one of the poles, and travel in a straight line to the equator.
2. Make a right angle turn and continue to travel in a straight line for a few thousand miles.
3. Make another right angle turn and continue straight. If you started at the north pole, travel north, if you started at the south pole, then travel south.
4. You will eventually return to the point of origin.
On a flat Earth, this would be impossible, as according to Euclid, two parallel lines will never meet, and the sum of the angles of a triangle can never be greater than 180 degrees. Take note that these rules only apply to geometry on a 2d plane. The fact that both these rules have been violated proves that we do not live on a flat Earth, but rather an Earth that can only be described using Non-Euclidean geometry. (i.e. a globe.)
Bless you, I'm going to use this
Prich319 Yes because on a sphere, triangles measure 90 degrees
Brilliant, but impractical. There's an even easier way to do it using this idea of geodesic curvature. There is a device called a Foucault pendulum that is essentially a big ball at the end of a very long string. Think a 60 pound sphere hanging on a 200 foot wire. This thing is a pendulum, so it undergoes periodic motion. For a small angle of oscillation, it's sinusoidal. But now, realize that this thing is moving on a line of latitude as the earth rotates. That's parallel transport along a curved surface. So, it will undergo precession if the earth is curved. You can calculate exactly how much precession it undergoes per day if the earth were a sphere. The period of precession is a day divided by the sine of your latitude angle. Experimentally verifying this formula at different places on the earth not only proves the earth is a sphere, but it also proves that it's rotating.
jmcsquared very interesting thanks for enlightening me
@@alphaarcva_1679 Lol I was actually responding to the op, the tag was an accident. My bad. But you're welcome nonetheless 😅
I'm amazed she remembers to breathe when she wakes up in the morning
...and I am saddened by the same fact.
Does she really?
@@thepolicedepartmentunited1543 Yes.
Yeah, I sometimes forget
John Lorimer I’m amazed that she think the earth is flat
I love how she doesn't trust science… unless it jus so happens to be convenient to her own narrative smh.
they all do this.
like owning an operating a internet video series that most likely utilizes a lot of science she doesn't agree with.
if you don't trust the idea of science itself, then any opinions that you have based on a belief that ignores the idea of science should be COMPLETELY IGNORED. They do not need debunking, they simply have nothing to stand on.
Science is defined as basically the systematic discovery of everything around us. Using observation, experiments, logic, and the power of multiple people making sure a theory you find cannot be refuted is what allows us to determine if something is true. Throwing away this process for conviency makes you completely untrustable as a person and any claims you make are worthless.
Modern science is the reason we have advanced so much in the 20th and 21rst centuries. Not people's stupid gods.
Science is literally the idea of finding truth. You might reject mainstream science for being wrong, but science is literally the process by which we learn about everything around us.
There's a very big difference between MAINSTREAM SCIENCE and the DEFINITION OF SCIENCE ITSELF. The former is generally believed easier due to it's credibility throughout time, the latter is literally just the process of finding things which are true.
The way I see it, science is the foundation for what anyone would use to find any truth in the world.
Moving on to mainstream science, which i assume is what you were talking about. We developed rocketry, robotics, and advanced computing and used this to develop rockets designed to go to space. We sent rockets to space. We observed the Earth and the moon in orbit. Nowadays, we have thousands and thousands of satellites in space which are necessary for long distance communication.
Your senses are generally reliable, but in some things they just aren't enough. When's the last time you saw an atom with your naked eye? We can observe these through electron microscopes, but light operates on a wavelength that is so large you literally could not see an atom even if you could zoom in on it enough. Another example being the curvature of the Earth, you could use your own senses to see it, but you would have to be on a rocket going into space. Why don't you attempt to become an astronaut and see it yourself?
There IS curvature. It's just so miniscule you can't see it without going very high in orbit. A plane (on the scale with the size of the Earth) is still just above the ground. If you were to create a scale model of the earth 791 pixels wide on your screen, the atmosphere would literally be 1 pixel wide on your screen. The plane is only a portion of the way up in this atmosphere. You have to be very high above the earth to see curvature with the naked eye.
I am not in a cult, rather I am atheist. I would be left wing, but disagree with their current regressing philosophies, and mostly align with republican ideas, although i wouldn't align with the ideology. I originally supported Trump (although he has been more hypocritical and radical lately). Authority in all phases of life? That's exactly what I'm against. That's why I left the left-wing area, it started to regress to intolerance and trying to force people to act a certain way towards certain "special" groups.
Anarchy is a complete failure in my eyes, we would literally never achieve anything, the sun would eventually engulf the earth and we'd all die, as animals with nothing ever achieved. Authority is necessary to a certain extent. And scare the hell out of me? No, you calling yourself an anarchist over the internet does not scare me, mostly because it is not a position of any threat to anything. You probably just don't like taxes. And it isn't called being a real man. Being a real man is supporting and attempting to change society in a way that can help other people around you. Not trying to be selfish and avoid any responsibility to others that a government implies. If you don't like how your taxes are spent, or how much you are taxed, you vote, protest, and try to change that. Trying to throw away society in it's entirety is not a solution to the problem.
Jon, you cannot be serious. Do you even know what the scientific method is?
It also includes experiments, also experiments of which you do not like the results. Often with instruments.
So, when on a sunny day you go and observe a ship in the distance disappear behind the horizon you measure all!!
Not only the hight but also the parts that are disapearing first.
And no, flattards do there "research" from the comfort from their home with google.
They can easily go to the southpole for them selves and see.
One of the simplest experiments from your armchair.
Go figure out how long a transatlantic flight takes on the northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere.
Things like that are simply not done by flattards.
Proof me wrong by showing your flight data on transatlantic flights.
Flat earthers are like
“I can prove that the earth is flat”
And 80% of the evidence are assumptions
@@renatopereira1121 found the crazy escaped flat head
100%
@@johnphinny1420 about 80%
The rest 20% is proof using the assumptions
More like, 99%
That's what they _want_ you to think. There _is_ no Earth.
I calculated angle between sun and horizon it was 60° my friend 1 meter awy calculated and what a surprise it was 60° too so sun is just 1meter abow..wow i discovered something great
glitch gamer *yes*
@@maulwurf9414 *yes*
Vikas Chaurasia,
*Yes*
I'd be arguing with you right now, but I just bumped my head on the sun and I just can't think straight anymore
Wow good job at proving nothing👏👏
The sound of her voice makes me want to tear my ears off.
Kenneth Okubo right my dude
#Kenneth Okubo
The sound of her voice makes me want to tear her tongue out!
Kenneth Okubo my politics teacher sounds almost identical to her and I have a 40 minute class on it...
I want to wear her thighs as hearing protection
Kenneth Okubo I agree
I dont know Stick. she busted out the crayons and makers, she might have a point you know. Anything done in crayons and magic markers is already 100 times more likely to be scientifically right..
The only thing that was missing was a smiley face sticker, some glitter, and some construction paper cutouts.
worlock1422 try it and have fun.
Shes the most talented "special" gal since temple grandin
Haha!
She has a point but it's her head
@@eneresolong r/facepalm
If this woman's logic is true then that means the Sun could be at any distance, like 1cm away.
Btw, that is false.
Logic?
The earth is flat and constructed by IKEA
Congrats to the ikea shoppers for creating the flat earth.
in soviet russia flat earth constructs you !
DAMMIT SWEDEN!!!
Ahaahaaha omg that's funny 🤣🤣
It would be a better flat earth than whatever she's describing! 😒
I have an idea:
We shall settle the flat earth debate once and for all.
Let's fund a rocket and send them to to orbit. If we make them look out the window, they'll say it's fake. If they do that, we'll let them go on a spacewalk. They'll say that there are projections on the helmet. If so, we tell them to take their helmets off and GTFO.
I'll help fund it and I will tell them they are going to see it as a flat earth just to crush them even harder than a hydraulic press when they find out the earth is FUCKING ROUND.
Yes lol
Or... we could just kill all flat earthers, just like how Galileo died.
Mary Mara How'd he die?
If my science and history is correct, Galileo was the first to suggest that the Earth was round, with scientific evidence. However, no one believed him, so they killed him.
And at that moment, the flat earthers realised...
They f*cked up
Girl in video: “from the horizon”
Me: you mean the horizon created by earths curve?
*CRACKING*
Ava Nicole *O M F G I C A N T F U C K I N G B R E A T H E*
*W H E E Z E*
*o o f*
😂😂😂
"The angles in a triangle have to add up to 180"
In a triangle on a plane surface, true.
But this is a spherical triangle (such as on a great circle), the angles do NOT add up to 180.
And the surface of the Earth is curved, so spherical trig has to be used.
In spherical geometry the angle sum can be 180
Talks about the flat Earth.
Uses Time zones at the same time.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
*Self-Destruction 100*
I am positive the irony escapes her.
She wasn’t talking about a flat earth but rather the distance to the sun. Her drawing was of a spherical earth.
Flat earhters saying there is a shell behind the sun would be ridiculous? Really? That's where you draw the line?
Chris Dishneau *earthers
Chris Dishneau if you draw a line it doesn't equal the horizon
Ooooh jk plz no hate this is joke
he only cleared up the general argument of what they claim. he did say the shell would be just as ridiculous as the flat earth belief, so the line has been crossed and the shell would be for extra tard points, but he was making sure he was addressing the common explanation of "spot light" and to not address the question as if they even mean it has a shell over it as a spot light does. This way the person asking the question knows what the flat earthers are actually arguing and how it is still flawed.
I recently joined the Flat Earth society. We have members all around the globe.
Ish Death Nice one.
Noice joke
Ish Death Nice one. 😜
Hmmmmm... Do I sence sarcasm?
Nioce!
Man, these quick cuts by that flat-earther must be indicative of damaged short-term memory!
I love how flat earthers think that their “common sense” and “observations” immediately disprove theorems and equations that scientists spent their lives on. Like, why?
ua-cam.com/video/3FBlR_5dCt0/v-deo.html
The east-going shadow of a heliocentrism solar eclipse cannot be modelled to scale.
This brave guy, for whom I have a lot of respect, did achieve an eastward shadow, but unfortunately he was forgetting that the sun distance is the crucial factor in shadow speed.
(Remember when you must have made faster shadows on the wall with a torch held closer to your hand ?)
Exactly the same principle is going on here.
So keen that you get the official explanation to the shadow direction issue is google, that you need only type, "shadow east" , let alone "why shadow east" and like a jumpy person it blurts out the mainstream answer!
I'm sure I used to see more hits in the past. So watch that space, because I think it's possible the globe based establishment may be on the hop and right now having to come up with a new answer.
Something like, that the eclipse shadow direction is no longer about heliocentricity's moon speed but tricks of the light, refraction etc.
(The recent change of ideas, that the moon is supposedly in earth's exosphere, may just be leading to a remodeling of how the atmosphere works so they can teach a new explanation for why the shadow can go east.)
If they do it won't fit. As far as I recall, the eclipse scale model (video above) has a reduction in the sun distance (when scale is taken into account), of about 30 hundred percent.
I'm sorry, but there really is something, central, that doesn't work in globe theory.
Orphan Red featured from 4:39 is correct to see the link between angles of sun elevation above us (whatever they be), the viewing platform's shape (flat or curvature) and the distance to the sun btw.
This website
phys.org/news/2015-01-distance-sun.html
makes believe that two of the ancient Greeks lived and produced their astronomy work in the opposite order!!,
thus helping to obscure that mankind would have had no essential first known length in the triangle moon-earth-sun, needed for any trigonometry for globe.
Best wishes.
@@fair1831 ''globe theory''
@@fair1831 Comedy gold. ;)
I think the reason why Flat-Earthers exist is that they don't understand how freaking HUGE the Earth is compared to a person. This is why when you look off into the distance, there's not much of a curve in the land.
Mohamed Elhassan no no they don't BELIEVE the Earth is as big as we say it is.
Sincere Flowers just flatter than we say it is
Ismail Riley
"They throw out their previous size."
The only people who do that are people who have never travelled and therefore believe that these other places don't exist.
I've been to New Zealand in the summer. I've seen the sun rise in the SE and set in the SW, above the horizon for about 15 hours. In the flat earth model, with the north pole at the center of a disk and Antarctica around the edge, New Zealand should never see more than about 10 hours of daylight, and the sun should rise in the NE and set in the NW.
phoenixshade3 you can't argue with a flat earther. There is no end to it. If that's what they want to believe.... let them. They say science is a lie and not a fact despite actual facts and evidence but deny it and insist their BELIEF is fact..... see where im going here. Like i said beforw though, them believing in a flat earth really isn't hurting anyone. I would honestly believe in a flat earth due to the fact NASA has been caught lying IF the theiry had a single shred of evidence behind it.
Well I guess the arguments over
Uggggh.
The education system has failed us
We take English classes for 12 years and are forced to take- at least I am- 2 years of a foreign language, it already has failed us
More in the US than anywhere else apparently
This made me happy for living in a country that's not the us
The mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell
We have some of the worst collage drop-out rates I think and we have studies that show the current education system (k-12) is the reasoning. but yet the government thinks taking more PSATs will fix that (only making it worse)
How do you watch these flat earth videos without having to go through a lot of therapy
I love how her drawing demonstrates the flaw with using 60 degree angles on a sphere (i.e. that they don't form a triangle) and she doesn't notice
Drugs are a hell of a drug
Hey, I mean if I had the crap these people were taking to believe in a flat Earth,
I would totally O.D because that shit has to be godly for them to take
SOOOOOOOO MUCH
Of that drug.
xoShiningKrystlexo don't do drugs girll
Two quotes poped in my head when hearing her talk. " Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul." And "Kids, don't smoke crack"
xoShiningKrystlexo well why do you have it burn!
Советская Россия r/wooooosh
Hahaha you found orphan red. She's the worst. I'm glad to see you made it out alive.
Stick figures are immortal.
Professor Stick I tackled her videos a while ago. I think I used up a few of my nine lives.
Rhetoric&Discourse Wow. How many?
Professor Stick I think I'm down to three.
+Rhetoric&Discourse I agree with your comment, she is a pathetic, and that's being generous. I hate it when a video of hers comes up as recommended viewing. Sometimes I can't help myself and have a look, then regret it for the rest of the day. The Dunning-Kruger effect has bitten her on the ass!
Hey do you wanna know a secret...
Google isosceles triangle
Is it just me or does she only know what a 60° angle is.
And 180°
But only barely.
4th grade math
To her, 4rd.
I am really surprised she is using triangles, because they are actually used to prove the earth is round. Like she said, the angles for an equilateral triangle are always 60 degrees - but that is on a flat surface. On a round surface the angles for an equilateral triangle are larger than 60 degrees and you can measure and prove that for yourself RELATIVELY easily.
gostei
yes so true...
She debunked herself without even realizing it. Thats the problem people dont look for evidence to support and disprove there theory only to support and even if there wrong and find something disproving there own theory they try to say it disproves the globe earth
The diagram at 9:26, if drawn correctly, shows that the 60Deg lines from each location converge very gradually over an extremely long distance (her diagram suggests they diverge, which is incorrect), which when extrapolated to their point convergence no doubt reaches approx 149 million km. Though tere are considerable errors in the points on the earth the readings would be taken as they would be a different elevations and they are at different latitudes, so that introduces a lot of error when taking the earth-sun distance into account. I just don't have a big enough piece of paper to draw the lines out to convergence. I guess that's what flat earther's do, they draw diagrams that totally misrepresent reality in order to support their fantasy.
I had this same debate a week ago with some flat earth nutjob, he didn't get it. I told him to read up on geodetic surveying and it was then when he told me he didn't understand what geodetic surveying was that the penny dropped for me.
Kids, don't do the drugs.
Kids, watch the video first.
And the comment above yours has somebody smoking
Don't blame drugs. The highest crackhead isn't as dumb as a flat earther. Should be:
Kids, don't UA-cam.
The drugs? Which ones?
i think you mean
Kids, don't forget to use condoms
Wow. She managed to get the concept of an equilateral triangle in her brain. I'm impressed.
if the earth was flat, we would be dead because it was going to colapse until it turns into a globe
I'vE nEvEr HeArD oF a FlAt DiSc *CoLlApSiNg* InTo A bAlL
Whatever drugs she is doing I don't want any xD
.....
But in all seriousness she is actually painful to watch....
It's a pain to watch how people share their stupidity with the whole world....good thing that's not the only thing the internet is used for otherwise it would have been shut down already.
It hurts
i want to punch something so badly after hearing her speak.
dumb/challenged low iq..
She just confused me.... She don't even know what she talking about
If I become very rich president, I will ban flat earthers and send them into the moon until they prove earth is flat.
jerungbiru55 and just like that. You have my vote
And build a wall, so they can't come back plz
You've got my vote
@@daltoneil408 no. Wall will not help.
@@daltoneil408 my plan is to create a powerful gauntlet that powered by six very powerful element that can annihilate oxygen from flat earthers body. Basically, they will turn into sands.
I would love to learn more about how a sun 6000 KM away would work and how it would light up exactly half the...well disc, I guess.
"It is better to remain silent at the risk of being thought a fool, than to talk and remove all doubt of it". - ABRAHAM LINCOLN.
*casually forgets that isosceles triangles exist*
CorgiDorki Wow! You totally destroyed that idiot in one sentence.
With 2 60° angles it would be an equilateral triangle. Her theory is still wrong because of what stick says in the video, but not because it could be an isosceles triangle.
Rodolfo Innocenti Risaliti oh thanks for the correction ❤️
Ironically the 60 degrees she is getting comes from the curvature of the Earth in the two different locations in relation to the observed Sun, but then uses the 'line through the Earth' to make the triangle as Stick said in the video.
simon turner Wow this comment thread is full of knowledge, except for mine, of course, it was pointed out as incorrect :')
Not all triangles are equilateral triangles.
+SheldonLudlow ...in euclidian geometry, which only describes objects on a 2-dimensional plane.
#notalltriangles
#isosocelesaretrianglestoo
2017 National champs #smashthegeometry
71dembones #RISESCALENETRIANGLES
#RISEISOSCELESTEIANGLES
#RISETRAPEZOIDS
DON'T LET OTHER SHAPES EQUINORMATIVE VALUES OPPRESS US
That woman was on some serious crack. Like, her voice sounding higher than louis griffin
The plane on a spinning Earth makes sense until you think about jumping on a plane and slamming into the back at 600 MPH
6:00 If you were going to cut out the irrelevant parts, why did you not just take out all of her video
WOW Shots fired
But I agree this entire video he showed us was pretty irrelevant considering she attempt to use things that proved the Earth was a sphere (I know it isn't a perfect sphere, I said it for simplicity )
midgetapple13 Gaming were in the stupid era
midgetapple13 Gaming that is what I thought
midgetapple13 Gaming ooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhh
Just a fun point, a triangle generally has 180 degrees on a plane only. On a spherical object (a sphere being topologically different from a plane), a triangle can have double or triple that amount.
HOORAY FOR TOPOLOGY!
I returned to this video as I saw I had abandoned watching it, I picked up where I left off @ 7:20...realizing why I had abandoned it...and I quote..." n...den...n juss...math...derp, derp...ew hehe...wRvlgrggle" end quote. If an equilateral triangle proves anything is flat, it's a one dimensional 360 degree circle...last time I checked...my body has a volume of mass that covers a 3 dimensional area with a multitude of internal energy and functions possibly operating and existing within a 4th, 5th or 6th...unless I am a wormhole, black hole or some kind of cosmic dimensional anomaly, it would not be possible to exist on flat Earth...someone hand me a baseball bat please, I have work to do...
It’s not out of the question that she might have a very minor case of serious brain damage
Minor??????
Circumference of Earth at Equator: ~24,898.344 miles
Radius of the Earth at Equator: ~3,962.694mi (Circumference÷2π)
She chose two points with different latitudes, that aren't on the equator, and one is no more specific than a country more than 400 miles wide! Instead, let's pick two places very near the same longitude, but are both exactly at the equator. The equator touches Brazil at ~(0°, 49.19°W) and Gabon at ~(0°, 10.82°E). They're approximations, because she listed the altitude of the sun at 60°--these two locations, at exactly 13:24 UTC, are exactly 60.00°--at least, within a hundredth of 60.00°.
www.suncalc.org/#/0,-49.19,10/2015.03.21/10:24/1/0
www.suncalc.org/#/0,10.82,9/2015.03.21/14:24/1/0
Distance between these two coordinates: |-49.19° -10.82°| = 60.01°
Distance in miles on surface: 4,150.416 mi (24,898.344mi ×60.01° ÷360°)
Distance of line straight through planet: 3,963.293mi (2 ×3,962.694mi ×sin(60.01° ÷2))
Since our angles are both nearly 60°, it makes sense the straight-line and radius would be almost the same.
So, 60.01° -60.00° at each point (arc÷surface distance - angle of sun) gives us an acute angle, at the sun, the double of 0.01°
A right triangle, whose 90° angle sits at the middle of our straight-line distance (3,963.293mi ÷2 = 1,981.646mi), and whose distant angle (the Sun) is 0.01°, so 180° -90° -0.01° = 89.99°. That's damn near a right angle. If the two points could "see" each other through the planet (which they wouldn't need to do if the Earth was flat, they could see each other), this is the angle measured from one point between the Sun and the other point.
Cosine is adjacent side divided by hypotenuse, or COS(θ) = adj ÷hyp, so hyp ×COS(θ) = adj, so hyp = adj ÷COS(θ). Adjacent side is 1,981.646mi, and COS(89.9°) = 0.001745. 1981.646mi ÷0.001745 would give us the distance from one coordinate to the sun. And that comes out to, well, 1,135,400 miles.
But that's not the distance science says! That's correct, because our angles are rounded to the nearest hundredth. We can't tick up one more hundredth of a degree, or we're at 90°, which would give parallel lines and set the sun an infinite distance away. Do we need to tick up thousandths of degrees? Millionths? _Billionths?_ Let's find out:
How much more precise, and how much more of an angle, would be required to make the correct distance? And is it less than a hundredth of a degree? Let's run the numbers the other way: COS(θ) = 1,981.646mi ÷92,957,130.359mi, so θ = ARCCOS(1,981.646mi ÷92,957,130.359mi) = 89.9987785773°. From 90°, that's a distance of 0.0012214227°. One THOUSANDTH of a degree less.
Our arc distance between our two coordinates was 4,150.416mi, or 60.01°. What arc distance would we need to match the angle above? (4,150.416mi ÷60.01°) × 60.0012214227° , which comes out to 4,149.809mi. Or, 0.6071mi (3205.724 feet) further apart than the two points picked. So I think it's safe to say that we've more than surpassed the limits of the simple tools we have access to. But this should serve to prove that your triangle doesn't prove the earth is flat, or round, or bigger or smaller than it's been calculated to be.
A variance that small is almost impossible to measure, and again, considering one point looks through a morning sun (lower heat and humidity, lower pressure), and the other through an afternoon sun (higher heat and humidity, higher pressure), the differing angles of diffraction of the atmosphere between the two would more than account for such a tiny variance. She only thinks she used math because she either didn't realize how many more steps would be necessary, didn't calculate (find) accurate numbers, or both.
*writes 2hr comment
*gets 2 likes
rip
senselocke incorrect. Did you not watch her explanation? Earth is clearly flat
My english is not so good thus I couldn't understand this whole comment but I surely know that this is how you destroy someone by using only words, congrats m8.
Why the hell did I hit read more???
curiosity killed the cat. and he did one hell of a job there, congrats to senselocke from me as well ^^
i didn't realize the earth was so low poly
Most of their answers are essentially "but my holly book
oh hai Cool hard Logic.
Wow, Mr. Stick! You, sir, have an astounding level of patience to do these videos 🙈
It's funny that when flat earthers find a flaw in their belief,they say scientists are wrong about it
Do you think they are correct ?
Just check governments and corruption..Vatican and pedophile Africa and people dieing starvation...ah ok scientist's are God and Jesus hahahaha
renato pereira he said science not government. Yes government is corrupt and whatnot, but science has no political bias, unless your political party believes that science is always wrong.
@youreconfused you are mixing things and simplifying them.
Mixing because professors are not the government, they are public employees yes, but also they are ex-students with passion for their discipline, and those professors make the departments for each university. So you can't just assume professors will censor information on purpose to students in pos of government interests.
Simplifying because plenty of reasons, 1) every country has a different government; 2) not every science department is ran by government, there's independent ones too, so knowledge gained will most likely get public one way or another; 3) the assumption you did at the end is a false dicotomy, were you claim if something is false it instantly proves the other; 4) you're implying a conspiracy bigger than what logic dictates is possible. For it to be viable government should only allow people with low ethic parameters in their lines, for which they should have really strange job interviews, if that were the case common public would notice, voice would spread eventually that there's something very fishy about those interviews, because they'd only need to admit people willing to hide information and allow their superiors to apply their mass control unpunishedly and unnoticed.
(Sorry not the best english, not the worse, hope it was clear enough)
@@renatopereira1121 ?
@@justanothersam5708 science it's a new religion ;)
I’m 12 and I can figure out at least 10 good reasons the earth is not flat
That's the reason why I think children are more intelligent than adults. 😑
It's an extinction event the sun's too close oh wait it's puny🤣🤣🤣🤣
I sadly have to agree. But, I'm very happy too. The next generation has more sense than some adults as shown in just this vid. :D
Ilikescake because it's NOT FUCKING FLAT.
Tell us these good reasons.
I love the way they think the whole world is fooled and pretending scientists are hiding truth and then they say "scientists say this or that " to prove point
Your really hurting the flat earthers with good actually theory comebacks and i love it
we have flat earth fans ALL AROUND THE GLOBE
Illuminati: Stay right the fuck where you are
Yeah it's a GLOBAL consipracy..... ---> GLOBAL
The more you watch Orphan Red, the worse she gets.
I can imagine.
kyzercube _ I don't buy it for an instant. It's an act, a put-up job, but there are too many people that take it seriously. It's pathetic.
Embrace the Ball I've been in many hangouts with FEers. There are basically 3 categories of them:
1: Mental disorder or history of sexual abuse ( not even kidding about that )
2: On drugs ( I've encountered many meth/coke head FEers already )
3: Charlatans that actually know what they're doing and truly don't give a damn about spewing metric tons of disinformation. They're just in it for the money/bitcoin/paypal ie: Jizm, Douchebay, Scott C'one ( aka Scatt Semen ), and MrLieandConnive.
kyzercube _ I put Orphan Red in the third category.
Hope you get paid for shilling like this.
Explain the Rain bow. You know the bow and double bow part. I get the splitting of light by water. But that does not make it bow. Show me video of an artificial rainbow and how they did it. Clue they put a light source inside a reflective bowl. Like the tabernacle of the Sun.
How if ever does flat earth explain how the southern hemisphere has 24 hours of daylight during summertime?
Fun fact: Equilatorial triangles' angles aren't always 60 degrees. They're only so on a flat plane. Try drawing a triangle with 3 equal sides on a cone. Have fun seeing some weird angles.
...or instead of equilateral triangles you could use middle school trigonometry
where do they teach trig in middle school?
GUI Guy I learned trig functions in geometry.
In geometry (which is taken by some 8th graders normally (the ones classified advanced, usually) or even earlier in special cases) you learn about sine, cosine, and tangent, and maybe the others (sec, csc^-1(x), etc., it is too long ago for me to remember geometry in that much detail).
I took Honors Geo last year, your not wrong, we barely scratch the surface of trig, we use sin cosine and tangent, that's about it. My friend was is in AP Geo and didn't touch it more than that either
GUI Guy not In South Georgia that's for sure. I had to borrow my older friend's textbooks to learn it at that age
Wait, if she is a flat earther, why was she use the globe earth as reference?
Because she is not a flat earther.
Jyden Schmid Oh yeah?
Yeah.
Yeah i was wondering that too
Armando Rizqy maybe it’s to gain the trust of sphere earthers
0:10 "If you want to skip to the second part, click this annotation to go there directly."
man i wish we could
shes the kinda girl to have a bowl of marbles on table.
No, I'd say she's the kind girl to HAVE HAD a bowl of marbles on her table. But then she lost them.
what i meant is, she lost them mentally so she is the kinda girl to compensate by having a bowl full of them on the table, something like self assurance ... :) i get what you mean though..
I nearly couldn't finish watching this video because she was so annoying to listen too. Lol!
I can't belive I had to spend 5 minutes of watching her, before asking myself, why am I spending my time on something lacking so much intelligence. To make myself feel better? nah just to numb myself and spend time for the shake of spending time
Its hard to believe that some people think that the round earth spins.
@@Robert-yf1knLol! I know. It's bad enough there are people that think the Earth is sphere shaped and orbits the Sun but, then to also think that the Earth spins is a whole new level of stupidity. Lol!-
It does. If it didn't, geostationary orbit would be impossible.
Sam Carver I'm pretty sure they're actually saying how the woman who's saying how the Earth is flat with equilateral triangles, not saying that it's ridiculous that the earth is round.
Flerfers can't grasp the idea of 3 dimensional things.
Fit4EPICness that’s because they have a 2 dimensional brain.
@@pistachio1293 you made my day.
They cant do that because counting to 3 is really, really, really hard.
Watching that young woman "explain" stuff made me cringe, but also showed three things:
1. Somewhere there are high school math/science teachers crying right now.
2. Being superficially "cute" but terminally stupid makes one ugly.
3. The White House may just have found a new science advisor.
The sun is 6,600km away? She... does realize that we have satellites 36,000km away, right?
1- PLANES : they are lifted by AIR. AIr is part of the Earth, and... spinning with it !
Hi so the air is spinning with the earth.....outer space is not spinning at all....so from the earth to outer space there is a gradual lessening of air, so, there should be a gradual lessening of the spinning of the atmosphere right? so does this mean that the higher a plane goes the slower it will fly?....
The vacuum of space is the absence of atmosphere; does it really make sense to say that the vacuum is either moving or not moving? In the absence of factors like turbulence or bombardment from solar particles every molecule of atmosphere would, I think, be like a tiny geostationary satellite no matter how far out.
I hope this makes sense. My main point is that a vacuum is not a stationary medium that is going to cause any drag on the atmosphere.
Correct. it wont cause a drag on the atmosphere because there is nothing there. What I saying is that the drag of the earth spinning on the lower levels of atmosphere would not be there in the higher levels so without this drag would the air molecules in the outer layers try to stop rotating with the earth as all matter without energy applied to it would eventually come to rest? thanks for your reply
DE S I think one has to consider that, as far as we know, a planet's atmosphere is formed with the planet, and so it has always been turning with the planet. But even if that were not the case, given enough time the drag of the lower atmosphere, it seems to me, should bring the upper atmosphere along with it, so it's all going at the same rate. A bit like stirring a mug of liquid except that in that case you have the resistance of the mug. You have to bear in mind also that the atmospheric layer is *very* thin in comparison with the earth's size.
"All matter without energy applied will eventually come to rest." This actually isn't the case. Only matter that is experiencing a resistance will eventually come to rest
exactly, air is moving at a relative speed similar to earth, air has mass, it can lift planes, power sails and knock down buildings. This is actually partially responsible for weather systems.
girl on youtube with crayons figures our mysteries of the universe. meanwhile, scientists around the world can't get it right.
Best comment all time haha
seems legit
Playasum ill explain it to you one by one
1.) The earth is round. We literally have pictures from space of a spherical earth, only showing one half of it's surface with the other concealed. A picture of the americas doesn't show euroasia, because the earths a fucking ball and one side is not shown. That's it. The end
2.) You seem to understate the difficulties of sending objects to space. "Expensive fireworks" The word expensive hits exactly the problem. I'd like to see you fire a shuttle to space, or even just make a regular firework.
3.) Of course you work at seven eleven, since you couldnt go to school and learn shit along with getting a better job
4.) Prove the earth is flat after you graduate.
5.) he was joking ya dipshit.
8.) This is awkward but i dont feel like deleting my comment
*Flat Earther sees sunset*
“IT’S PHOTOSHOPPED!”
The earth is flat.
Therefore angles.
Therefor the earth is flat.
*LOGIC WINS AGAIN!*
I think she does this drunk. Just listen to her.
Lemmy Koopa King Or just another ditzy chick that thinks all her mistakes can be overlooked as long as she acts cute. It's the same with "gamer girls" who bounce their tits to distract from the fact that they actually suck at video games.
Lemmy Koopa King yes in another video you can see her drinking drunk confirmed
@@killianlile173 can you provide such a channel name? Asking for a friend :)))
Someone should explain to her that triangle prove the Earth is spherical (roughly). If you start at the North Pole, and go directly south to the equator, then turn 90 degrees east, and travel one quarter of the Earth's circumference (90 degrees of longitude) then turn north 90 degrees you end up back at the pole, arriving at a 90 degree angle to your starting course. You form an equilateral triangle with angles adding up to 270 degrees rather then the 180 degrees in flat triangles. On the flattard Earth, the trip from west to east would be LONGER than the other two legs, but it isn't. This is why navigators use spherical geometry for anything other than short trips.
" navigators use spherical geometry for anything other than short trips"
This bit blew my mind a little. I mean, it makes total sense when you explain it like that, but if I happened to find myself on a boat and having to make these calculations, I would totally not take any of this into consideration and probably discover a new continent when I meant to travel to India.
Ooh! A Columbus joke. Well played!
Pat Doyle thank you!
Nah my man Earth is flat,
the sun is 4134 miles away and EVERYTHING was just vaporized by the heat alone as our DNA is deconstructed into elementary particles. Yup, Earth-chan is most definitely flat
David Butler so is your brain if that's your logic
Sun set is my favorite argument.
I want to rip out my hair listening to that girl😭😭
Excellent video. I doubt Orphan Red cares if she's right or not though, or even if the Earth is flat or not. She's getting attention from drooling guys, who seem to find her little girl act a turn on. Personally, it turns my stomach.
Oh yeah. It's so obvious that she's trying REALLY hard to act "cute" and stuff, like a little girl.
I will defend mi'lady's honor and theories no matter how ridiculous they are. *tips fedora helmet*
VIRGINS FOREVER!!!
She's useless at it then. I'm a sucker for the cute act and she wound me up before she finished her first sentence
J
Are videos like her's even worth debunking, she obviously failed elementary school.
she failed at being human...
That just proved what those Flat-earthers are
They are worth being debunked...'Cause their so god dam funny!
Not just elementary, but preschool as well.
People who think that the earth spins arent very smart.
Not a single documentation of the edge of the world and yet here they are.
Your last argument is literally how we discovered we were rotating around the sun, almost 2000 years ago! Why is flat earth a thing?
Cause we once thought that and they still exist it was just small number but now it's growing again hoping to claim the earth once more
I don't think she understands how distanxe works, it's almost as if she thinks the world is flat...
Oh wait...
if the sun were 4000 miles away...
WE'D BE BURNING ALIVE! GAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
oof
we wouldn't ever be alive because earth wouldn't be suitable for life for the most part
I think we wouldn't be burning ALIVE anymore...
Let's just say i would be reading that comment if that was the case.
Bro the earth wouldnt exist if the sun was that close lol
I don't think Flearthers even consider Comets, Asteroids or NEOs in their models... I want to hear them try to explain this. There are a plethora of other Astronomical bodies which defy Flat-Earth logic.
Wait, what am I saying... Models and Logic?!?!
Their model is just a typical 2D Atlas, and even then they add extra features, such as some odd Ice boundary which "nobody has ever seen", yet they've mapped beyond that boundary, which features more ice which has a sea between the two of these so-called boundaries. WTF!
If nobody has ever seen beyond this apparent boundary, then how do they know that there is another?
Logic - Oh yeah, that's me being nice *cringing as I type*. Just replace 'Logic' with 'stupidity'.
Read ancient civilizations Sumerians egipcians maybe you learn something real ;)
I think horizon/horizontal answer to everything...
Assuming words and his meaning.
Otherwise take your curvizontal/curvizon globoides
@@renatopereira1121 omg here we go. Flattards attacccc
@@billyn07 attack ?!its the globoides who attacks...everything os relativity for explain rotations hahaha
Did you already saw Antarctica in a globe ?
I think no...just on Google like us...so until they show it's ridiculously what you said.
If you talk about photos and videos there also flat videos and photos like globe...but from flat they're old...now we can't go there with a balloon :(
So if you find a explanation ;)
9:22 and also, THAT'S NOT A STRAIGHT LINE!!!
i like how you put your ad in between the parts, it kinda made it feel like a TV show. good job!!
I want to see a reaction of a Flat Earther going into orbit XD
DogeNetwork Gaming and More! Have you gone to orbit just wondering
Michael Aiwohi no but it would be cool
Sadly, they would probably just dismiss the view from orbit as a fake video or something.
They would be like "wow, nice tv windows, now show me what is actually there!"
E135 Instead of making them watch from a ship, we'll just chuck them out into open space with a suit to float for the rest of their lives in space.
As a student who is currently in geometry, she set up her triangle wrong by claiming that the sun was 93 million miles from each person on the flat earth not in the middle where it would make a straight line from the sun to the earth making the sun actually farther away from the people than what she claimed
By the way, if you were wondering how far it would be it would (going off the assumption that the people were 1000 miles apart) 93,000,000.00134409 miles from sun to person
I feel like she would claim that I have two heads because there's a skull tattooed on my shoulder.
Damn, that must mean I'm a conjoined twin due to the skeleton on my back 😂
And plus you have to consider that it takes 7 minutes for the suns light to reach earth along with atmospheric refraction
Maxatal mhm?
"ridiculous and contrary to all observations" doesn't normally stop Flerfers, so why *don't* they argue for a 'shell' on their spotlight sun?
I think she proved the ilimanti is real and I know I spelled it wrong
Lol good one
The Marrano Jew Ignatius of Loyola created The Jesuit Order AND the ILLUMINATI. And it is The Jesuits who are behind the Globe Earth Conspiracy, the BIGGEST lie of all lies.
www.worldslastchance.com/end-time-prophecy/the-jesuits-the-globe-earth-the-mother-of-all-conspiracies.html
@@tonimakkaroni182 !?
You mean I am a blind believer?
As someone who is pretty good at trigonometry, this lady’s lack of mathematical competency hurts me.
I know that feel.
According to her, there is only one kind of triangle - the equilateral triangle and the distance of the sun depends on the distance between two people!!!
If two people stand 5m apart then the sun should be at a distance of 5m from both of them!
WHY DOES SHE EVEN TRY TO EXPLAIN THAT SHE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND OR HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF ?