IRON MAN (2008) | Mover Ruins Movies

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 864

  • @deltasource56
    @deltasource56 4 роки тому +1448

    i like how hes on a personal cell phone in a secure area

    • @djsonicc
      @djsonicc 4 роки тому +167

      when Tony Stark calls you answer regardless if you're in a secure area or on Titan

    • @isaac-vb1ng
      @isaac-vb1ng 4 роки тому +50

      @@djsonicc phones arent allowed in lol

    • @backseatpolitician
      @backseatpolitician 4 роки тому +10

      Lol. Well it was a burner phone. 🤷‍♂️

    • @djsonicc
      @djsonicc 4 роки тому +31

      @@isaac-vb1ng i don't think you understand

    • @isaac-vb1ng
      @isaac-vb1ng 4 роки тому +48

      @@djsonicc in areas where there is sensitive information government officials are not allowed to bring in phones or other electronics

  • @drunkenbarbarian8211
    @drunkenbarbarian8211 4 роки тому +443

    “It’s not a bogey anymore it’s a hostile” C W Lemoine: every one of these videos.

    • @kennyraiden9346
      @kennyraiden9346 4 роки тому +8

      I noticed that too. Probably he knows the regulations and rules of engagement and all that, but he acts out this way so it adds excitement.

    • @tbeller80
      @tbeller80 4 роки тому +16

      There's a scene in Dawn's Early Light where a B-52 is being chased by three MiGs. The radar operator says they have bogeys coming up on them. The pilot interjects "those aren't bogeys, thems bandits!"

  • @FighterAceee94
    @FighterAceee94 4 роки тому +713

    They're not even close to supersonic according to that HUD...

    • @octobias6705
      @octobias6705 4 роки тому +12

      could be knots idk didnt look

    • @JacenHawk
      @JacenHawk 4 роки тому +56

      @@octobias6705 they are at .51 mach according to the HUD.

    • @Ripsometime
      @Ripsometime 4 роки тому +58

      @@JacenHawk Yeah, the F22 is at .51 before Iron man went supersonic, but the second time we see the HUD the F22's have caught up and, although it is hard to read, they seem to still be going .51

    • @JacenHawk
      @JacenHawk 4 роки тому +2

      @@Ripsometime Ah, didn't see a clear enough short to read it the 2nd time. That is an unfortunate slip up.

    • @HansGruber006
      @HansGruber006 4 роки тому +1

      @Smash That EXACTLY

  • @abelingaw5070
    @abelingaw5070 4 роки тому +537

    That is one of the things not realistic here, a Major is disobeying a direct order.from someone higher in rank (Lt. Colonel).

    • @york7201
      @york7201 4 роки тому +18

      IKR! That always bugged me

    • @legofan9551
      @legofan9551 4 роки тому +2

      Yep Colonel 1 major 0!

    • @roji556
      @roji556 4 роки тому +38

      Yes and no. Rhodes is an O-5 but he’s not in command here, the major is the CO in this case and has Operational Control and Responsibility whereas Rhodes was asked to be there but not as a co. The major may also have an AOR in this case. Now no one is going to sound like that much of a dick but it’s not really particularly unrealistic.

    • @tbeller80
      @tbeller80 4 роки тому +20

      @@roji556 Rhodie's official job is liaison to Stark Industries. That O-4 Watch Officer or whatever his role is in command of that room.

    • @abelingaw5070
      @abelingaw5070 4 роки тому

      @@mee5601 Regardless.

  • @beatboxbuggi6884
    @beatboxbuggi6884 3 роки тому +154

    "Training exercise, isn't that the usual BS?"
    "It's not that simple."
    "Sure it is!!"
    WOW I laughed so hard

  • @Tpachal
    @Tpachal 4 роки тому +885

    I'm going out on a limb here but I think the realism ended when a Genius, billionaire, playboy, philanthropist, built an exosuit in a cave... with a box of scraps.

    • @BigSkyCards23
      @BigSkyCards23 4 роки тому +59

      How dare a movie not be realistic

    • @KaziusAzran
      @KaziusAzran 4 роки тому +65

      Still one of the most entertaining movies of the past 2 decades :)

    • @danielrobinson2861
      @danielrobinson2861 4 роки тому +11

      I'm not Tony Stark!

    • @surfingtothestars
      @surfingtothestars 4 роки тому +25

      Iron Man 1 still better than the last 3 Avenger films combined

    • @ve6009
      @ve6009 4 роки тому +2

      @@BigSkyCards23 Joke flew over your head.

  • @mooblu8837
    @mooblu8837 4 роки тому +175

    Ive noticed that Major talking to a Liutenant Colonel like that, disrespectful

    • @idunbeezasmart1
      @idunbeezasmart1 4 роки тому +41

      That depends. Sure, not calling him "sir" was disrespectful, but if the Lt. Col. wasn't in the chain of command, his rank means nothing there. Even Pvt. Snuffy is God when he is ordered to guard the gate. "Walk my post from flank to flank and take no shit from any rank."

    • @toddkes5890
      @toddkes5890 4 роки тому +14

      Outside chain of command, but the Major could be asking unofficially, hence the "Rhodey". If he use Lt Colonel's Rhodes' rank, the question would be official

    • @blainehutcherson7251
      @blainehutcherson7251 4 роки тому +5

      That's paperwork!

    • @SobaOfPulaski
      @SobaOfPulaski 4 роки тому +3

      @@idunbeezasmart1 don't confuse your rank with my authority Captain!

    • @hunterlindbert2679
      @hunterlindbert2679 4 роки тому

      His ass would be grass

  • @IcthioVelocipede
    @IcthioVelocipede 4 роки тому +78

    I wonder why movie jets are equipped with guns straight out of World War I? Movies often overdo a lot of things, but aircraft gun rate of fire seems to be the one thing they consistently under-do.

    • @djsonicc
      @djsonicc 4 роки тому +11

      I'm guessing so that normal folks can hear it. Modern aircraft guns fire too fast.

    • @agostonbazmajer1100
      @agostonbazmajer1100 4 роки тому +5

      And the Aim 9 also has a very little scan zone in the movie.

    • @lonew0lfclaw859
      @lonew0lfclaw859 3 роки тому +4

      Yeah man wat the f#₹k?
      The actual firing rate of the cannon on an F22 is blistering fast!!
      These guys butchered it and this movie is supposed to be about weapons tech!
      Disappointing.

    • @Swedester
      @Swedester 3 роки тому +2

      @@djsonicc what do you mean? You can hear the gun just fine it goes BRRRRRRRRT

    • @ryanshannon6963
      @ryanshannon6963 5 місяців тому

      @@Swedester I think he means by the time you hear it, you may not hear it any longer?

  • @HayderAbdulridha
    @HayderAbdulridha 4 роки тому +179

    That major is now job-less, how does he talk like that to a guy higher than him.

    • @persistentwind
      @persistentwind 4 роки тому +3

      Iron majors... gotta have them.

    • @toddkes5890
      @toddkes5890 4 роки тому +28

      Outside chain of command, the Major is in charge of the situation, but will definitely listen to a higher-ranking officer. The major even tried to unofficially ask for information, saying "Rhodey"

    • @PetrPss
      @PetrPss 3 роки тому

      He is in Iron Man 2.

  • @ajaymanhimselfcodner
    @ajaymanhimselfcodner 4 роки тому +64

    My greatest dream as a black youth is to become a fighter pilot so I always watch your vids.....and I always memorize your words which are “make them tell you no “

    • @jimkennedy4509
      @jimkennedy4509 4 роки тому +13

      You can do it. Keep working toward it

    • @AmyAnnLand
      @AmyAnnLand 4 роки тому +12

      I truly wish you the very best in accomplishing your dream. And yes, his motto is perfect to apply to so many aspects of life. He's a great role model.

    • @terrencebradford1315
      @terrencebradford1315 4 роки тому +2

      Here's a little inspiration for ya! Does my alma mater proud. Aggie Pride!! ua-cam.com/video/FarARtZpMPs/v-deo.html

    • @fastkarr8256
      @fastkarr8256 19 годин тому

      @ajaymanhimselfcodner are you a pilot yet?

  • @telecleez
    @telecleez 4 роки тому +61

    Well Tony technically wasn't out running the AIM-9 but I will say he did release those flares a little bit late.

    • @VunderGuy
      @VunderGuy 3 роки тому +4

      Obviously. The blast causes him a minor inconvenience.

  • @jamesandrew59
    @jamesandrew59 4 роки тому +59

    But he didn't outrun the AIM. It literally closed on him within 3 seconds. The flares were deployed way too late, which is why it chased him and exploded in close proximity, knocking him off level controlled flight.

    • @VunderGuy
      @VunderGuy 3 роки тому +6

      Yeah, CW suffers a lot from what I like to call 'lazy military man' syndrome where they're so puffed up on their own MRE induced flatulence and talking your ears off about technical matters that they ignore very obvious and basic plot points that third graders can very clearly and try and throw their credentials in your face when you call them out on it. I mean, I thought chairforce people were supposed to have a particularly high IQ that tied into being able to see the finest details. I'm glad he got out before we got into a hotwar with a peer opponent. Probably get shot down in the opening weak because he forgot to spot the very obvious SAM batteries on a very prominent hill.

    • @mtf-alpha-1
      @mtf-alpha-1 2 роки тому +26

      @@VunderGuy get some help

  • @KylewTyphewn
    @KylewTyphewn 4 роки тому +83

    I just watched this movie a few days ago and I was wondering why Mover hadn't reviewed it yet! I do love this movie, though.

  • @warhawk9566
    @warhawk9566 4 роки тому +82

    so defending the movie, and sorry that i'm that guy but I would say with the man seat seperation I think the movie is trying to imply that the ejection malfunctioned and the handle you talked about was jammed or something? And the AIM 9 was catching up to him and the Iron Man suit is also supposed to be able to accelerate to pretty much impossible degrees. Anyway again sorry to be that guy, love your videos

  • @theCTCamp
    @theCTCamp 4 роки тому +102

    Would love to see you review the Tomcat vs. Japanese Zero scenes from The Final Countdown.

    • @mrjava66
      @mrjava66 4 роки тому +5

      The turn radius of a zero is so small. If the Japanese pilot was prepared properly, he could out turn fight a f-14. The f-14 would have to use the boom-and-zoom tactic. Yes, please rip up the final count down.
      Also, a f-18 with laser guided bombs and a night vision/infra-red pod could totally destroy any ship at night with a few passes and totally be impossible to fight or counter in any way. You would attack the Japanese at night, not during the day.

    • @tyranusfan
      @tyranusfan 4 роки тому +2

      @@mrjava66 They didn't have any F/A-18s aboard Nimitz in the film. Intruders, Corsairs, at least one Viking and one (photo-recon) Crusader

    • @starleighpersonal
      @starleighpersonal 4 роки тому +1

      they wasted a dang sidewinder on a zero

    • @bjlewis5431
      @bjlewis5431 4 роки тому +2

      @@starleighpersonal
      Well, let's not be stingy..we have plenty of 'em!
      And with all the bean-counters & feminazi Karens in the world, our crews need to take every single chance you can get to deploy a live warshot, especially in actual combat with an armed aggressor..
      Admittedly, I might've wanted to play with 'em a bit first & tag 'em with the guns too..see if the guy survives to bail.
      But I'd DEFINATELY have let go a sidewinder to finish off the enemy machine after the guy bails.

    • @EgorKaskader
      @EgorKaskader 3 роки тому +1

      @@mrjava66 Considering how unholy an advantage an F-14 has in speed, energy, fire control and weapons power, there's no need to turnfight, boom&zoom would really be a good call. No need to turnfight an old prop if even your wake poses notable danger to it.

  • @dbrady1966
    @dbrady1966 4 роки тому +141

    Imagine CW on the set as a technical director...it would be awesome

    • @gregandkaruna6674
      @gregandkaruna6674 4 роки тому +20

      Nope it would be a very boring movie!

    • @philhines
      @philhines 4 роки тому +14

      Lol he’d be like ‘Nope... nope... nope...’ 🤣🤣

    • @paullinkins8121
      @paullinkins8121 4 роки тому +8

      CW's head would explode from all of the director's overrides of what the technical director says. Things that are technically correct don't always make for interesting or exciting viewing.

    • @sh0ckv3l33
      @sh0ckv3l33 4 роки тому +1

      you'd have people dead of boredom in the theater.

    • @erik1tennant
      @erik1tennant 4 роки тому +10

      @@sh0ckv3l33 Realistic doesn’t always mean boring, I feel like CW could do a pretty good job of keeping it interesting while making it at least a little accurate

  • @PassportBrosBusinessClass
    @PassportBrosBusinessClass 4 роки тому +50

    So once the public knew of Iron Man, did Stark get a bill for one destroyed F-22?

    • @cholesterol6703
      @cholesterol6703 4 роки тому +3

      No, because the scriptwriters say so.

    • @therealsharat
      @therealsharat 4 роки тому +5

      150 million dollar a POP lmao

    • @tdylan
      @tdylan 4 роки тому +13

      Nope. The public had no reason to think that had anything to do with Iron Man. It's not like the military said "Well since he's made it public, we would like to revise a statement we had made months ago."

    • @toddie4usa1
      @toddie4usa1 4 роки тому

      @@therealsharat wrong!

    • @justuslm
      @justuslm 4 роки тому +11

      Only if he also sued the air force for unlawfully attacking him, but the court decided that even though the air force made no attempt to communicate with him, and ignored basic rank order during the operation, the actions of the F-22 pilots were still justified because Stark was flying through a no-fly-zone.

  • @RetroFrito
    @RetroFrito 4 роки тому +18

    "I don't know what hostile act he did" - Would his actions on the ground in the previous scenes be viewed as hostile? It wasn't against American forces, of course, but he was an unknown causing great damage in an "active war zone." What would a real-world reaction be to something similar? Genuinely curious.

    • @bemusedalligator
      @bemusedalligator 4 роки тому +11

      the airforce guy said it was a legal no-fly zone, which basically means if you take a plane into that airspace they consider it hostile unless they have reason to think otherwise.

  • @merchillio
    @merchillio 3 роки тому +17

    The “hostile” thing he did was flying in a no-fly zone, according to the movie

  • @darknut9696
    @darknut9696 4 роки тому +80

    Could you look at the Final Countdown film, its the one where there 2 f 14's splash a pair of Zeros in WW2

    • @donkeysunited
      @donkeysunited 4 роки тому +1

      Like this (was also in my feed today)
      ua-cam.com/video/NkOsXNF_ZoM/v-deo.html

    • @nikelinq2899
      @nikelinq2899 4 роки тому +6

      I am hoping for him to review that.

    • @karel3183
      @karel3183 4 роки тому +3

      Yes! Final Countdown!

    • @HochgeborenKlown
      @HochgeborenKlown 4 роки тому +1

      I always hated that scene...Kirk Douglas couldn't make up his mind what to do and then the 20mm's only caused a little smoke when they hit the A6M's...

    • @tyranusfan
      @tyranusfan 4 роки тому

      @@HochgeborenKlown Douglas' character wasn't convinced that it wasn't some kind of Soviet psy-op, so he was reluctant to give a shoot down order. He was fairly skeptical of the situation for most of the movie. It was only when the planes got too close to the Nimitz for comfort that he decided. All that said, I'd like to see that movie covered here too!

  • @jajuny1627
    @jajuny1627 4 роки тому +46

    hello mover, according to the comics iron man can go at 4.0 mach in that suit (the mark 2) and up to 8.8 mach in his best suit (mark 40) and the speed of an aim 9 is mach 2.5 so he could outrun that missile without any trouble

    • @bartfoster1311
      @bartfoster1311 4 роки тому +34

      So you're saying he was just trolling these F-22s and could have just punched out and taken off UFO style..

    • @VoodooV1
      @VoodooV1 4 роки тому +8

      that was the Mk 3 suit, not the Mk 2

    • @gregandkaruna6674
      @gregandkaruna6674 4 роки тому +9

      He would of passed out going from his current speed to mach anything to outrun the missile.

    • @000xgage1
      @000xgage1 4 роки тому +9

      @@gregandkaruna6674 he's supposed to have a g-proof suit. Maybe fluid lining or sth. Literally never experiences g forces

    • @nikovlogs9837
      @nikovlogs9837 4 роки тому +6

      So the tic tac was iron man?!!

  • @kinagrill
    @kinagrill 4 роки тому +1

    Actually, if you look close at the ejected seat, the pull-handle appears wedged or somehow warped or stuck in place and cannot be pulled. that's why Ironman punches into the machanism itself to force-release the manual-chute pull.

  • @ViceKnIghtTA
    @ViceKnIghtTA 2 роки тому +5

    4:10 "he could probably get it out of his couch cushion" 😂🤣🤣😂🤣

  • @steve2171
    @steve2171 4 роки тому

    YES! I think I asked for you to do this on a video a while ago. Not sure if that's why you decided to do it or not but I'm glad you did.

  • @SWTobito0702
    @SWTobito0702 Рік тому +2

    Iron Man did in fact go supersonic just before the F22 fired the missile. I think canonically a standard Iron Man armor could go up to around mach 8.
    Also funny you should mention the SR-71 cause when Tony tested out the prototype of the armor in this flight scene, he actually measured his armor up against the altitude record of the SR-71.

  • @Charles_And_Christina_H
    @Charles_And_Christina_H 4 роки тому

    I suggested this one a few months ago on another one of your "Mover Ruins Movies" videos. Glad to see it!

  • @calebeastman4069
    @calebeastman4069 4 роки тому +8

    I didn’t know I needed this. I knew something off when I watch this. Thanks Mover.

  • @emersonsrandomvideos248
    @emersonsrandomvideos248 4 роки тому +354

    We have to admit that ironman's F-22 scene is epic

    • @thh1997ptvn
      @thh1997ptvn 4 роки тому +19

      Yep, It is!

    • @SomethingSeemsOff
      @SomethingSeemsOff 4 роки тому +8

      @Norse Woodman lol as someone that doesn't really care for Marvel stories/movies, even I understood this

    • @MadSpectro7
      @MadSpectro7 4 роки тому +13

      The whole damn Ironman movie is epic. It's one of the best Marvel movies ever.

    • @linusa2996
      @linusa2996 4 роки тому +4

      I don't know, I see a pair of CGI F-22's chasing a CGI puppet.
      The F-22's are not even flying as they would in real life. Nor are vapor where they should be.

    • @voidwalker9223
      @voidwalker9223 4 роки тому

      @Mars Exulte calling out edgelord with sarcasm is just as edgy in 2020.

  • @christianreyna5270
    @christianreyna5270 4 роки тому

    oh thanks mover for reacting to this! i was one of the guys that requested it. keep it up bro 👍🏽

  • @goatbacon2977
    @goatbacon2977 4 роки тому +1

    Love this channel !! Great videos !!

  • @jonathanmiller9281
    @jonathanmiller9281 4 роки тому

    Thanks Mover. You always give me a reason to come back. Thanks very much.

  • @trentoneldridge5945
    @trentoneldridge5945 4 роки тому +14

    Mover didn’t even mention the insane amount of Gs Ironman was pulling.

    • @alexisbaz8746
      @alexisbaz8746 4 роки тому +1

      I'was thinking the same, and he gets hit with misseles and hit the ground like a doll... and he is okay, maybe they can make that more realistic if the pilot is a superhuman in some way, that's why I'like the Spartans from Halo, they are realistic in a lot or ways xd

  • @blaydeesy2005
    @blaydeesy2005 8 днів тому

    I love how you kept correcting the major… I was in Balad watching this when it debuted there and quite a few of us were like “uhhh… you mean yes sir?” lol.

  • @snakeandnape9252
    @snakeandnape9252 4 роки тому +1

    I think as an airline pilot you should break down the individual "Nightmare at 10,000ft, scenes from the Twilight Zone franchise. Love your work.

  • @alje311
    @alje311 4 роки тому +9

    My favorite series is back!

  • @VideoManDan
    @VideoManDan 4 роки тому

    I didn't even know this channel existed until I saw it on my recommended. Good stuff! Definitely going to watch more of your videos!

  • @pbdye1607
    @pbdye1607 4 роки тому +16

    You forgot the clip where he askes Jarvis "how high could the SR-71 go?" and ices up.

    • @lawlessfpv
      @lawlessfpv 4 роки тому

      @Billy Hill He eventually adopted the gold titanium alloy used in satellites to overcome that icing problem lol

    • @rykehuss3435
      @rykehuss3435 3 роки тому

      @@lawlessfpv There's no icing problem in space, because there's no moisture to freeze on surfaces

    • @lawlessfpv
      @lawlessfpv 3 роки тому

      @@rykehuss3435 what about low earth orbit satellites?

    • @rykehuss3435
      @rykehuss3435 3 роки тому

      @@lawlessfpv Theyre outside the atmosphere as well

    • @lawlessfpv
      @lawlessfpv 3 роки тому

      @@rykehuss3435 they aren't. Although it's pretty far up.

  • @warotimi6182
    @warotimi6182 4 роки тому +1

    A Major deciding a course of action when a Colonel asks him to stand down. That's court-martial worthy performance 👏🏻

  • @wesleylee1147
    @wesleylee1147 4 роки тому

    He finally did this movie! Was waiting for so looong.

  • @EDCandLace
    @EDCandLace 4 роки тому +6

    The funny part is Tony being able to go from hover to super sonic nearly instantly... The acceleration G would be insane lol and then i guess the suit protects from the sudden stop of the human jnside the suit when hitting the ground at terminal velocity or smacking buildings at high speeds... Just because the structure doesn't contact the body the inside of that suit damn sure would lol.

    • @orlock20
      @orlock20 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah, ask those retired NFL players about those concussions and they were moving slower.

    • @Ripsometime
      @Ripsometime 4 роки тому +1

      Say the suit was heading for Mach 2.5+ to outrun the AIM-9 in the 10 seconds since the start of the acceleration until the AIM-9 caught up, thats 8.7G, but in reality, they are at cruise before the acceleration. F22 HUD says .51 (although it says .51 after they catch up as well, probably just didn't bother changing the speed on the HUD), so he only needs to make up Mach 2 in 10 seconds which is 7G. If he has training and the iron man suit works like a G-suit, he could do that.

    • @tdylan
      @tdylan 4 роки тому

      @@Ripsometime He doesn't have training though. We see him still very much working on the suit while watching a news broadcast about what's going on in the area. In a rage he repulsor blasts his lab, then suits up and takes off to the war zone.

    • @Ripsometime
      @Ripsometime 4 роки тому

      @@tdylan What's to say he didn't fly high G aircraft at some point before then? Dudes an adrenaline junkie who owns a weapons manufacturer that also makes aircraft, also has high up connections in the Military, especially the airforce.

    • @tdylan
      @tdylan 4 роки тому +1

      @@Ripsometime That doesn't explain his brain not crashing into his skull during the sudden stop when he does that "3 point super hero landing."

  • @navydave9667
    @navydave9667 4 роки тому +1

    My man, Mover! The Harrier scenes from True Lies! Taking out the bridge, Arnold breaking off the rust as he takes off aggressively, and the entire building engagement. Let's get some!!!

  • @andyrockism
    @andyrockism 4 роки тому +1

    Great Video Mover, Keep These and any video coming.

  • @blakemoreno776
    @blakemoreno776 4 роки тому

    Oh my god. He took my suggestion. Love the vids my guy

  • @SpaceWolfPainter
    @SpaceWolfPainter 4 роки тому +7

    One of the greatest movies of all time, the movie that allowed the entire Marvel universe to gain traction and actually happen. "not a bad movie" LOL

  • @sikacod
    @sikacod 4 роки тому +10

    Could you do Independence Day? One of my favorites.

  • @skarmex3439
    @skarmex3439 Рік тому +1

    "Definitely not a bogey if you're shootin at it,"
    Me: 🤣🤣 "True,"

  • @bobbrown8661
    @bobbrown8661 4 роки тому +7

    One for the suggestion box: How about the F22 Starscream scene from Transformers?

  • @Pavk-9918
    @Pavk-9918 4 роки тому +1

    Also something that seems strange to me and I need someone who knows to clarify it. When a bogey is in range locked on and it doesn't make any evasive maneuver keeps the same direction... Isn't it a sign that it doesn't have hostile intentions and that it just wants to leave????

  • @idkwhatcoolnametouse8987
    @idkwhatcoolnametouse8987 18 днів тому

    funny enough, you can see on the belly-shot where tony was hanging onto it that the Raptors belong to the 71st Fighter Squadron, aptly named the Ironmen
    but they also didn't get the Raptor until 2023 so there's also that

  • @picoletor
    @picoletor 4 роки тому +2

    am i the only one who noticed at 4:13 he is looking at the schematics of an YF-22 lightning instead of a raptor?

    • @sladestryder5264
      @sladestryder5264 3 роки тому

      Do u mean 35 or ?????

    • @jaxyouwill
      @jaxyouwill 2 роки тому +1

      @@sladestryder5264 the YF-22’s original designation was Lightning II, and then they gave it to the F-35 later when they chose raptor for the final designation

  • @pwebbo1979
    @pwebbo1979 4 роки тому

    Just found your channel Mover, I always wanted to be a fighter pilot but I'm too old now. Keep up the good work mate, you're vids are awesome!

  • @DonVigaDeFierro
    @DonVigaDeFierro 4 роки тому +1

    You should check the Wyvern intercept scene in Patlabor 2: The movie.
    It's animated, but everything down to the radio chatter seems very well thought out. You may like it.

  • @maxwellclark6992
    @maxwellclark6992 4 роки тому +10

    They love to say bogey, don’t they. Great video, do you think you can do a mover ruins movies on the original top gun

    • @razorbackblood06
      @razorbackblood06 4 роки тому +2

      I thought he already did Top Gun.

    • @MotoroidARFC
      @MotoroidARFC 4 роки тому +1

      @@razorbackblood06 nah. Just the trailer for the new one.

  • @louispenn9253
    @louispenn9253 4 роки тому +4

    1:21 They're not using guns, that's weapon release. plus that stick movement suggests they'd be rapidly diving

    • @Nghilifa
      @Nghilifa 4 роки тому +2

      And the gun sounds like a .50 cal too.

    • @crashtestdummy9985
      @crashtestdummy9985 4 роки тому +2

      @@Nghilifa Was just about to ask what the hell Raptors are doing with a couple Mod Deuces. Then I realized it actually sounds more like an AK than a .50cal. Been a while since I've heard either, but those are definitely not 20mil rotary cannons.

    • @llYossarian
      @llYossarian 4 роки тому +1

      ​@@crashtestdummy9985 How good can your hearing really be if you think it's the "Mod" Deuce? (...it's the MA Deuce for anyone wondering)

  • @RIP_Sloucher
    @RIP_Sloucher 4 роки тому +7

    There's a UA-cam clip you should check out; it's called "Dogfight F-18 Vs Mig-29". The uploader is named Double Duke. The video is a promotional shoot done by an airshow over in Europe. Not very realistic, but I suppose that's kinda your shtick with these reactions. Anyways, check it out.

  • @grimkupid8478
    @grimkupid8478 4 роки тому +5

    This scene brings up a question I have with regards to your training specifically, with regards to ejections and parachute landing. In all the military training specials I've seen, I've never come across pilot ejection parachute procedure. You do cover what the sequence is in this video to get out of the plane, but how much training is offered after? What type of parachute landing training is given to pilots? I'm really curious to know, if you could provide some insight into the training that you've had it would be greatly appreciated. Please & Thanks

    • @1twoProductions
      @1twoProductions 4 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/l1ObX0XiPkk/v-deo.html

    • @z1maass727
      @z1maass727 4 роки тому

      there are special design training aircraft where the back seat( with trainee on it) can be eject while the pilot flys the aircraft around.

  • @nickofhelmet
    @nickofhelmet 2 роки тому

    Dude I just love your stuff. Thanks for the details

  • @jamestheotherone742
    @jamestheotherone742 4 роки тому +6

    Fighters in wingtip during an intercept- It's "Cinematic".

  • @martinrps13
    @martinrps13 4 роки тому +5

    3:49 pretty sure he punched the manual chute release....not the ejection seat handle

    • @nikelinq2899
      @nikelinq2899 4 роки тому

      I think so tool

    • @CWLemoine
      @CWLemoine  4 роки тому +1

      That handle would be on the side of the seat, not where the ejection seat handle is on the front.

    • @jasonharris2863
      @jasonharris2863 4 роки тому

      C.W. Lemoine You weren’t when the pilot tried the man seat sep. Hollywood made it get stuck for some reason. He punched the side of the ACES II.

    • @martinrps13
      @martinrps13 4 роки тому

      C.W. Lemoine the “emergency manual chute handle” is on the right side of the seat. This is where he punched with his hand. The “D-Ring” is on the front of the seat between the pilots legs. But I am unaware of the pulling of the manual chute handle will separate the pilot from the seat....I will ask an egress technician tomorrow or look at the TO.

    • @jamesrice6096
      @jamesrice6096 4 роки тому

      M61 kinda sounded like a... not a vulcan cannon.
      BTW, does mover find permanent bogies irritating? And, did you write 'em up?

  • @dryzalmynelli9600
    @dryzalmynelli9600 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks for this one!!!!
    Don't tell Tony, he'll be upset. 😂

  • @TakeDeadAim
    @TakeDeadAim 4 роки тому +1

    Hey mover. I just realized that transitioning to whirlybirds means you can keep the beard. No mask to seal up! Good job!

  • @treeamble585
    @treeamble585 4 роки тому +1

    this is the movie that got me into aviation and when Lemoine said "if he hit that wing hard enough for it to break it's going to hurt" I'm thinking I feel like you don't know this but Iron man got shot by a tank while in mid air and he just brushed it off and shot a missle at the tank I don't think hitting an F-22 wing will hurt "that" much

  • @WildBillKelso32
    @WildBillKelso32 4 роки тому +2

    Flight of the Intruder would be a good one. Really enjoy these.

  • @Raist474
    @Raist474 4 роки тому +1

    Also the cannon sounds like a single barrel vickers machine gun instead of a rotary cannon.

  • @amazingmao
    @amazingmao 2 роки тому +1

    I think the purpose of the close distance wasn't to intercept and engage, it was for visual identification of the unknown

  • @Silva820
    @Silva820 4 роки тому

    Love the insight you provide in your videos!! Very cool stuff 👍

  • @PhantomViper49
    @PhantomViper49 3 місяці тому +1

    Pilot: it looks like a, man
    Mover: Man!
    😂

  • @JL-uv1ms
    @JL-uv1ms 4 роки тому

    Fantasy,fun,but nice to have a professional spot things that are outrageously incorrect,lol the harness in the F-22 is not fastened to anything,thank you Mover for your expertise,you made it fun wishing you ,success and happiness in all you do.!

  • @theeldenpost
    @theeldenpost 4 роки тому

    Been waiting for this

  • @bigjay5516
    @bigjay5516 4 роки тому +1

    Hey if u haven't done it yet. You gotta do a break down of the first transformers movie. Excellent military scenes.

  • @timothysherrange
    @timothysherrange 4 роки тому

    Been waiting for this one. Grabbing the popping corn.

  • @deangordon7783
    @deangordon7783 4 роки тому

    CW did you see that video of the 52 F35s airborne from Hill AFB? Amazing sight. Just saw the video on UA-cam. It's from US military news. Wow it cost $44,000 an hour to operate an F35. That's nuts

  • @flatbill2
    @flatbill2 4 роки тому

    I just watched an episode of making of the Mandalorian, Jon Favreau explained that they flew the route with two trainer jets to get reference plates. But they couldn't have two planes in the same shot.

  • @masatotanaka999
    @masatotanaka999 4 роки тому

    There is a scene from stargate continum where F-15s and MIG 29s battle the Goa’uld death gliders. You should take a look at that scene someday.

  • @macieksoft
    @macieksoft 4 роки тому

    HUD is from F-16 with extra fake ted triangle. And NAV mode means they are enroute, not engaging.
    Not to mention flying .51 mach (just below 300kts CAS). Funny how radar altitude is missing, even know they are just 1.7k feet baro.
    The gun sounds like AH-64 gun, not even close to M-61. Common mistake in movies when gatling guns sounds like single barrel. Most audio guys don't know the shit about it.
    1:31 COMSAT rack have some gear from recording/mixing studio, you can see graphic equalizers and compressors.

  • @Optimus888Amicus
    @Optimus888Amicus 4 роки тому

    Hello The Great Pilot ! 🌞😉👍
    Happy, Nice, Sunny Day to you !

  • @deltacs4934
    @deltacs4934 4 роки тому

    Hi, I would personally recommend to watch Yukikazu and パトレイパーf15s scene. Its been said that those movies are well made but wanna make sure how the real former pilot would react.

  • @everythingman987
    @everythingman987 4 роки тому

    At 4:14 the diagram in Iron Man's HUD is a YF-22 lol, very different airframe to an F-22A.

  • @theRumpkie
    @theRumpkie 4 роки тому

    Adding an interesting point to Mover's comment about the a2a missile, if you look on the hud, Ironman jumps from about 1100 yards/meters at 290 knots to pulling away from the Raptors at roughly 600 meters per second adding another 1300 mph to his already 330 mph in less than 4 seconds, and the pilot announcing he just went supersonic.... It stands to reason that if the acceleration continues by the time that a2a comes off the rail, Ironman is pushing Mach 3+ over the 14-second scene, probably not unreasonable given his main thrust comes from a pair of repulsor engines from the Jericho missile system. And then he adds the two hand repulsers. That kind of acceleration response is probably quite possible on a suite that weighs about the same as an aim7. I suspect Tony would be under strain as he would be pulling just a bit over 9Gs.

  • @WildBlueYonder
    @WildBlueYonder 4 роки тому

    He was pulling up on the Man Seat Separation handle. It looked like it was jammed

  • @SarcastSempervirens
    @SarcastSempervirens 4 роки тому

    Also, the F-22's firing like 4 rounds per second :D Tu-tu-tu-tu... like some ancient Gatling.

  • @Spotcats
    @Spotcats 2 роки тому

    I know this post is long after this vid is relevant, but it don't hurt to ask questions. I heard that the G force experienced by ejected pilots causes most if not almost all of them to pass out. Everything after the ejection would have to be automatic, including seat separation. Is this correct? Also if Mover sees this I wanna say thanks for the channel and entertainment man. Keep doin what you do.

  • @lawlessfpv
    @lawlessfpv 4 роки тому +1

    Iron man was probably accelerating to mach 2. But the AIM9 caught up. He didn't outrun it tbf.

  • @iBlue0riginal
    @iBlue0riginal 4 роки тому

    1:50 Surprised to see that it's downloaded from UA-cam, not Pirate Bay :o)

  • @robertzeurunkl8401
    @robertzeurunkl8401 4 роки тому

    I like how this guy knows the difference between "bogey" and "bandit". I didn't watch all the vid, so I do not know if he got to explaining "bandit".
    All of the Continental United States is watched by long range radar sites situated along coasts and borders. Surveillance techs watch these radar. For the most part, they ignore them if they are outside the ADIZ. If they cross the ADIZ, they become "unknown". (Gotta say, here, I am former NORAD/23rd ADS, Tyndall AFB, Weapons Controller - "Oak Grove" to any 80's era fighter pilots who flew anywhere in the Southeast United States at that time). Once they cross the ADIZ, the "Identification Section" get's them first. They try to match the incoming radar track with any known, filed flight plans. Maybe it's an airliner with a non-functioning transponder, or malfunctioning radio. If they can't identify the track in a short time - literally, just a few minutes, they declare the track "Unknown".
    The *biggest* jump in activity in a NORAD facility is when the PA System comes on in the whole building, and the announcement is made: "Track U267.... UNKNOWN". The place erupts in activity. Weapons controllers and Senior Director staff scramble to the control room. Calls are made to scramble interceptors. ID continues to try to ID the aircraft. They have only a few minutes before the Senior Director orders an intercept. Interceptors from the nearest AFB are launched. Weapons Controllers use ground radar to vector AC to the target. About 9 times out of 10, ID will successfully ID the AC and the interceptors will RTB.
    But when they can't, the intercept takes place. Taking us to this place in this video. I like how this guy tells the truth about not shooting at an "unknown". "Unknown" becomes "bogey" as soon as interceptors are launched. Even once they intercept, the target is "bogey". Only when the target exhibits clearly malevolent intent does it escalate to "bandit". (I didn't watcht he whole vi, so I do not know if C.W. mentioned the "bandit" label.
    For me, as a Weapons Controller (because the USAF, in an extreme case of understatement, refers to an F-15 as a "weapon", not an "aircraft" - thus "Weapons Controller" instead of "Air Traffic Controller" - though I still tell people my job was "ATC", because they have no idea what a "Weapons Controller" is)... For me, the occasional intercept mission was to intercept a Soviet Union TU-95 "Bear" Delta Bomber on a run to Cuba. They fly right along the ADIZ, and then once in a while, cut in and head for land. Usually alongside the coast of Georgia or Florida. They time how long it takes our interceptors to arrive. Take pics of our planes for their intel files. We take pics of them for our intel files. They linger for a while then turn their lumbering beast back out to sea and go (went) on their way to Cuba. And, Usually, this was a pretty friendly affair. A quick exchange of salutes from both cockpits, and we go our seperate ways.

  • @AgiDaKinG
    @AgiDaKinG 4 роки тому

    I wouldn't mind seeing you cover one of the videos "TheFlightChannel" posted a day or two ago, normally that channel covers commercial airline accidents but he recently made a video that covered/re-created an incident involving two F-14s shooting down two Libyan MIG-23s, it would be interested to get a pilots take on the incident.

  • @johnsteiner3417
    @johnsteiner3417 3 роки тому

    Quick question: Did they at least get the F-22's gun location correct within the air frame? At least it's just the one gun, but I don't know where it was installed.

  • @jakubfabisiak9810
    @jakubfabisiak9810 4 роки тому

    Once again - please do "Red Flag: the Ultimate Game".
    Also: the spitfire scenes in Dunkirk, and Blackadder's basic flying training.

  • @Patriotsounds
    @Patriotsounds 4 роки тому

    Please do Final Countdown, that would be hilarious. I think it was a Hornet vs a Zero? Been years, can't remember exactly.

  • @7James77
    @7James77 4 роки тому

    I know nothing about flying, but damn, man, I enjoy watching you talk about it.

  • @jazzechos1372
    @jazzechos1372 4 роки тому

    That is true an O5 does out rank a Major, However if the O5 does not fall within the Majors chain of command (observer) .The O5 does not have the authority to issue a lawful order disrupting the O4 standing orders or usurping his authority of an operation/ command of the O4. Now if he was a Full-Bird then maybe but even Full-bird knows when to stay out because he want's to make his Star.

  • @akthegamer150na2
    @akthegamer150na2 4 роки тому +1

    in this part of the movie he is in a no fly zone like the movie briefly states

  • @tommytexter4054
    @tommytexter4054 4 роки тому +1

    would love to see how Mark 50 or 85 do against F22....lol.

  • @Ss-hn5rf
    @Ss-hn5rf 4 роки тому

    "You don't know what it is but you still engaged and shot it"..... Murica!!!

  • @idunbeezasmart1
    @idunbeezasmart1 4 роки тому

    Can you do Final Countdown? I'm not only interested in your breakdown of the flight scenes and S.O.P. accuracy, but I'm also interested in your professional opinion of how successful would the Nimitz be taking on the whole of the Japanese attack fleet.

  • @mrjava66
    @mrjava66 4 роки тому

    An Aim-9 is pretty speedy off the rail. I think you once described it as “like a bottle rocket”, when you launched one. But an aim-7 or amraam has a low enough thrust to weight ratio at launch that 2 to 3 g-s of thrust in a target could out run the missile for a while. In principle, and “in character”, a better directing choice would have been a custom “gen-x/z” decoy that would hack and confuse an amraam.

  • @iketurnher4745
    @iketurnher4745 4 роки тому +1

    Bogey

  • @timsonins
    @timsonins 4 роки тому

    Hello! I would like to ask, what is a mover in the context of the video title? English is not my first language. Only meaning I have points to your videos

  • @Butterzzzz
    @Butterzzzz 4 роки тому

    Are you familiar with older planes? A review of midway would be pretty cool, lots of air battles

  • @shrekvt
    @shrekvt 4 роки тому +1

    You need to review Flightplan the movie...