2019 Technical Regulation Changes Explained
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 жов 2024
- All the details you need to know on the regulation changes that will increase overtaking and promote closer racing than ever in 2019.
For more F1® videos, visit www.Formula1.com
Like F1® on Facebook: / formula1
Follow F1® on Twitter: / f1
Follow F1® on Instagram: / f1
If it means cars can actually follow each other and will allow better racing, I'm all for it. Like Ricciardo said, it would be much better for the sport if the cars were a couple seconds slower but could race.
Its sad to think the only good races so far have been the ones involving safety car.
@Alumnikiid Yeah, people bitch how artificial DRS is to create overtaking, but i think safety cars are way more artificial on mixing up the order, really exciting, but really unfair and artificial. Not saying that i dont like seeing it, but its not fair at all.
Kasetti 55 “people bitch”
Let’s be honest. The fanbase will bitch about anything. They demand closer racing, then the FIA does something to address that. Then you see them saying they don’t care about overtaking. Can’t please the fanbase
They should scrap nearly all the stupid rules, let them refuel, whatever, let the teams battle it out like it used to be. The authoritarianism of F1 is always playing catch-up to reality and wrecking the races. I mean they’ve even banned the grid girls ffs the plonkers.
Measurit Properly Refueling will never come back nor should it ever come back. It was very dangerous and there were incidents in almost every race, some had several. It created nice change to strategies but it is just way too dangerous and way too prone to human errors. I'm amazed there are still people like you thinking refueling would be a good idea... Short memory or you're new to F1.
Can’t blame them for changing the regulations for next year. Always frustrating to see a car close up and they stay behind the one in front for almost the whole race
BR1993 it’s a step in the right direction, for sure. It’s just frustrating to see things like DRS. Having to engineer in overtaking seems so futile.
It always tough to find a balance between fast cars and overtaking. Both we want to see but very hard to manage 😂 I wouldn’t want to be the one to call the shots
Hamilton behind Riccardo. As soon as he got a second behind Ric’s car he had no grip through turns
i really dont get why they are not pushing the aero toward more ground effect ? .. if the biggest probleme is dirty air .. with cars aero based on ground effect we get rid off that ... and we get less drag so less fuel used .. lets turn the f1 cars into "fan cars" .. because the problem is not that cars are faster .. its that the aero they using to get faster is creating dirty air
Night Drivin' Avenger because ground effects are dangerous. It makes constructors use less downforce on the wings in favour of the ground effect. That's all fine until a car is launched a bit and all the ground effect is lost
Hoping for a lot more overtaking action in 2019
yeah that's the way we are in now, each season we are waiting for next season to be an interesting one but we all know what will happen next... some fans are actually watching GP2 (f2) rather than F1,itself.
I hope in Monaco as well.
+Antoine Monaco is a disaster of a track. Interesting for Q, but race-wise, disaster.
Cyvan true true
Antoine Yeah, but unfortunately that isn't going to happen. Overtaking has always been and will always remain next to impossible there no matter what you do to the cars, or the tyres, etc.
That awkward moment when you are a Williams designer and are finding out most of the 2018 stuff in this video isn't on your car. Whoops!
Lol!
Week ago people were crying about boring races with no overtakes, now if they change the rules to prevent it, everyone are crying about slower cars
Yeah it’s impossible to please everyone
Hea Mees More than half of the people in the comment section are always complaining.
F1 viewers will cry about anything, there are comments on this video saying to remove the halo next year too lmao damn jokes i swear
Well now they are actually faster
Now that F1 cars are so extremely safe, can we bring back the Nurburgring? (Edit: I meant Nordschleife. Even though nurburgring is coming back 2 years later 🙂)
Kioumaars Taeed Cars are too wide, I think, for effective racing.
Kioumaars Taeed The bumps in the surface would probably break something
Americano Beans What's Monaco's excuse then? I'd rather see Nürburgring on the calendar instead of Monaco to be honest.
Kian Stevens Agreed.
Kian Stevens Monaco has no place on the calendar IMO so it's irrelevant to the discussion currently. But to answer why they keep it, I assume it's because of tradition and the prestige of it.
It did not, in fact, make racing closer.
Racing still isn’t close
Can’t we just make the cars smaller? I mean ever since 2010, the cars have become more and more gigantic!
TRMS I would rather see the tracks get redesigned, dropped off the calendar, or build new tracks that can make racing interesting again. Canada is a great example of a track that once was great. But, now, even Canada can not accommodate these faster and larger cars for passing. And do not even get me started on the street tracks. They ALL need to go.
Definitely. Right now the Mercedes F1 car is larger in both width and height than the S-class saloon. We need to go back to when cars were around 4.5 metres long.
Every time I see the two cars enter the tight coner, I imagine two cars squeeze together between the barrier.
The problem with that is that they have to get so big since refueling isn't allowed anymore. Even now most of the race is spent lift & costing to save fuel
Completely agree. Every race start these days are two by two.
Do you remember when the car was designed by teams
many many millennia ago
Do you remember when "F1 fans" didn't complain about every single thing that is happening, even though the same things have been happening for 68 years?
Rule changes happen all the time and this will (theoretically, they are not wizards) improve overtaking and competition. I really don't get why people complain about "no overtaking boring sport" but also "no, don't change the rules (for the better), the car should be designed by teams" and then even calling themselves "fans"! If you don't like it, good luck finding a Motorsport with no rule changes and super close racing which is also at the top of motorsport.
TheKoalabear crybaby cry
Eugene Foo ironic as he’s not the crybaby here
and actually has sense, all I would want is a return to natural aspiration + KERS asap, since I found that era of F1 more exciting than the current era, but I really don't mind all that much and I am not going to whine at the organisers as its a waste of time.
F1 "Fans" have no idea what they want.
You all want F1 to be the pinnacle of speed and innovation, but you want the drivers to play a part as if it were a single-make series! You want the best teams to be rewarded for building the best cars, but you want underdogs to be able to fight and cost caps to keep them in the series.
They say you can't please all the people all of the time. Well I don't think F1 "Fans" can be pleased any of the time. No sooner do they say they are making changes to reduce the effects of "dirty air" than people start to whine about how the cars will be slower.
sinbaadi With regards to team disparity, MotoGP does a great job of maintaining that balance
Internet F1 fans are suck balls so much, they're not coming to the races anyway why would you listen to them.
I also want free donuts, hot dogs, ice cream, coffee, fried chicken, french fries, pizza, chocolate cake, meatballs, hamburgers, and a hot girl to sacrifice my virginity.
just some spoiled murrican kids that always want something a different day
All these regulations are getting out of hand😂
maybe McLaren can found something this time .
Jaspreet Singh I hope because Alonso is a very very good Driver
Jaspreet Singh that makes no sense
Simon Krause like everyone hoped in 2016, 2017, 2018...
yeah, i hope alonso drives next year too
he will beat barichello record then
(sorry about my bad english)
Simon Krause I predict Alonso going back to Renault if he stays in F1.
I feel like we've reached the point where going back to simpler aero and technology actually helps the races be more competitive which in turn makes it more fun as a spectator sport
Now f1 fans be like, let's start complaining how slow the cars will be, f1 fans are just killing f1. if f1 dies, f1 fans are to be blamed and believe me it will if the fans continue to be such hypocrites.
The TV ratings are dropping because the races are boring and people can't watch cars follow each other, so they are at least trying to make it more interesting
How can the fans kill F1 when they have to do what the fans want? All the sport depends on us fans. If nobody will watch it, nobody will sponsor it.
@BlastForward ,I agree with u and that's what the fia are doing here try to increase overtaking and hence better racing but fans have already started to complain about this as well, we will see how this move goes but at least we have to let them try
I'm not disrespecting anyone here
BlastForward yes but I’ve seen the same people who complain that the aero design is ruining races with dirty air, go on Twitter and they hate these changes cause it’ll slow the cars. Many fans just want something to yell at the FIA about
F1 Fans: Races are too boring! Make close racing and overtakes easier!
FIA: Okay, we’ll make that possible
Also F1 Fans: WHAT ARE YOU DOING!? I DONT CARE IF THERE’S NO OVERTAKES YOURE MAKING THE CARS SLOWER.
Americano Beans Some F1 fans will never satisfy.
You stupid fuck they are different people but there are also different solutions
Americano Beans that's just you bro
Maybe he wants the F1 racing of the 60s and 70s, where cars exploded, and people died left and right. It was an exciting time. Extremely dangerous, but exciting.
Haven't you realized there is always 2 types of people.
For example:
Messi or Ronaldo
Coca cola or Pepsi
Samsung or Iphone
So your comment is kind of pointless now because a certain group asked for more overtaking and Im asking for better engeniered cars.
I like these changes, simplifying the car design and focusing more on the driver. DRS is still a bit too cheesy and videogame-like.
then go watch indy car
@@martineles7369 That escalated quickly.
2020: Replace petrol engine with hairdryer from Formula E
Well that didn’t happen
The FIAFOM really missed a trick here F1 should really have re-explored ground effect aerodynamics -this would have meant less wing turbulence but still massively fast cars . However the FIA seems to have phobia of ever looking into ground effect again ever since it was banned in the 80s because of Safety . Tech have moved on a long way since the 80s and surely engineers could develop ground effect aero that is both effective performance wise and safe for drivers.
Stephen Taylor even with modern technology ground effect isn’t safe. The way the cars currently are if you lose grip mid corner you can save it (i.e. Perez in Canada, Verstappen in Brazil) but if the main aero is ground effect once you exceed the limits of ground effect all downforce disappears and you’re off into the barrier with no chance of saving it whatsoever.
Modern tech isn’t going to change that.
Just because it might cause more spins doesn't mean that is unsafe -no one is going to be killed by spinning the car into a barrier especially with the Halo. Modern technology can always make things more efficient. Ground effect is clearly the way forward.. These are the best drivers in the world a they should be tested.
Can’t agree more. It puzzles me why they bring in all these changes and refuse to explore ground effects again.
Enter the Bully if there is a Bump or let's say you hit the kerb, then the car will suddenly loose traction and since you can't really see bumps on the straight it is too risky.
it works in lmp1
"Things are supposed to get simpler in 2019"
I hope for you liberty media, that you concept will work and make races more attractive. Right now it's hard to watch with almost no overtakes between the top Teams and slower cars ,where equal. Good luck
It’s tough because I love seeing the lap records getting broken at every track. Qualifying is really enjoyable but on Sunday the racing isn’t very enjoyable. I think it’s more frustrating because the cars are actually very close (especially midfield).
P.S- it is just me who has got used to this type of racing. Maybe it’s because I’m a new fan but I’ve kind of gotten used to a Canada type of race.
Good job F1 good job...
Is this sarcasm?
Ben Wiese I guess you don't want overtaking
iliovecaRS he doesn't want overtaking with drs
iliovecaRS when did I say I didnt want overtaking?
@@lor7780 indeed it doesn't improve racing. But it improves fair racing or something like that.
What's the point in making the cars faster if you make them slower again 2 years after?
NtsParadize Nothing.
Just to say you did it, I guess lmao
NtsParadize it will catch up by 2020
But in these 2 years, the cars have become much faster, so it should theoretically neutralise
I don’t know, maybe to improve racing and overtakes?
Yeah closer racing.....
Is this Racing or Ping Pong?!?
2007-2008 was better for me, light nimble fast cars that could race each other for the full distance.
Well that is some good change but teams like redbull are strong on aero so that they can be close to front runners. The removal of complex aero and more effective DRS means cars with powerful engine will always stay at the front. They can start on 10th and still finish on podiums. The real change should be on the power unit, standardizing the MGU K and MGU H could be better.
akhileshmoorthy RedBull will dominate next year because Ferrari and maybe Merc will loose more because a large part of the downforce of the RedBull comes from the ground of the car which will not change, Ferrari and Merc car are more depending on the frontwing
How do you have such a competent knowledge on this subject, may I ask?
@@Freshottolotto yeah and the weakness of the RedBull is power and guess which two top teams will have less drag and more powerful engine oh yea they can win some races for sure but dominate I don't think so unless Honda does something about it
If this change can leave performance above 2016 levels, but also bring racing and overtakes above 2016 levels, then it is a win win
Yes! The 2016 cars were perfect racing machines (only the cars looked a bit... meh). Imagine the 2016 season with Ferrari up there with Merc like we have now? It would've been the best season we had in a long time!
I hope that will be the case
What about Nico and Lewis at Austria, Nico and Lewis and Seb at Abu Dhabi, Nico and Verstappen at Silverstone, Verstappen and Vettel at Silverstone, Gutierrez and Riakonnen at Monaco in the rain, K'Mag and Palmer at Austin. I agree the racing wasn't good in 2016, but I managed to pluck those examples from my head.
Nico v Lewis' battle in Austria, is how the few seasons have been really in the sense differing tyres types and ages allows for pace advantages/disadvantages and therefore overtakes. In the hybrid era, the only real battles that really stick in my mind of close racing were between or involved Nico and Lewis in '14, '15, '16 (because they were so equal) and as of '17 and '18 Verstappen (because of his do or die racing style). I see your point though about overtaking being a product of DRS and tyres. However, if you look at Nico v Lewis in Bahrain '14, they produced probably the best racing of the hybrid era because their cars were so equally dominant, no complaining about F. Wings or 'dirty air'. I think to solve the issue maybe look at the 2014 cars, especially the Mercs just for inspiration because they were trading positions at will for half the race, esp after the SC. I dont know if im making sense to you, but just my opinion. I see your point, but looking at it both ways.
Max vs Dan at Sepang 2016? Those cars could go wheel to wheel at almost any track, I've yet to see anything like that since. And if you want to go there, in 2018 all passes for the lead were made either under SC, DNFs, or due to vastly better tires. If Montreal's 3 DRS zones can't produce some overtakes, you know the formula very negatively affects racing.
not gonna lie, Watching someone overtake with DRS is like watching a dad beat it’s 5 year old son at a game of football.
Both happen very rarely.
people talk like it is so easy to overtake with DRS, well it is not, ask Bottas when he couldn't beat Vettel even when he had DRS and was clearly faster
Carlitox b I presume you’re talking about Bahrain, correct? So wasn’t bottas something like 5 seconds behind going into the last few laps? He only caught up about half way around the final lap so there’s no way DRS would be as effective. DRS is supposed to close the gap of a second generally around the whole lap, so by the last straight, the cars can overtake. It’s unrealistic in the higher tier cars to make up a second and pass in a DRS zone.
Carlitox b *in a single DRS zone
The biggest thing they need to address is making the cars shorter at the wheels, they are way too long now.
Just have one dry tyre compound that is designed to last somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 a race, ideally so it's viable that a team could decide to manage the tyres to achieve a one-stop, but it's generally more beneficial to push and two-stop. With Pirelli as sole supplier, there's no need to have multiple compounds, as it's not like a rival will just make a more durable single compound. This would reduce expenses, increase the number of required pit stops and make it easier for newcomers to the sport to understand. Any "intrigue" over tyre selection strategy at the moment is minimal at best.
Who else is watching Le Mans?
It seems you're not watching Le Mans, if you are here
Louis Aresi sure he can im watching le mans on tv and this on tablet😁
formula 1 in le mans would be amazing tho
🤙🏼🤙🏼
LamboWalker I am too cause most of the comments around here are ridiculous
Cheers and go Alonzo
I'd like to see pre-2009 front wings come back - I don't like how front wings nowadays extend in front of the front wheels. I'm not sure if I'd prefer pre-2005 low, narrow or raised, narrow pre-2009 specifically though since the 05-08 cars looked pretty radical and awesome.
Yep. Significantly reduced downforce overall would produce better racing, as would narrower (or just harder) tyres. It would put performance much more down to the driver than the engineers and designers.
Mario Andretti said this in 1979. It is still true today.
F1 2030: Bus derby
20 Years ago were much less regulations but somehow F1 got much faster since then.
Id like to see a video where an engineer at Mercedes debates these changes with an engineer at Williams
So many specific regulations - I wish engineers could pretty much do what they want, as long as the cars could be tested to ensure they don't create a certain amount dirty air. This would allow cars to overtake, while allowing various weird & wonderful solutions to be invented - a huge amount of the appeal of F1.
Phillip James Thats a great idea!
Thirty + years ago the common answer to "what is the difference between F1 and other series" was that other series specify what IS legal, while F1 only specifies what isn't.
That's an oversimplification, but at heart does go to what F1 was in relation to the rest of the motorsport world. There have always been a lot of regulations, but the amount we have now (specifying the location of exhaust exits, nose design, number and location of rear wing 'gills', mandatory pitstops etc) is pure overkill.
That the FIA believes this level of minutae management is necessary speaks to how fundamentally flawed the present car, engine and tyre specification is.
It's time for wholesale change. If that means F1 cars are no longer the fastest around any given circuit, so be it. We cannot go on imposing ever more extreme regulations on the cars... fundamentally change the nature of the regulations once and let the designers get back to work figuring out how to make the fastest cars under those regulations.
Teams would use different cars for the FIA tests (different wings) and would make them think that their cars aren‘t creating a lot of dirty air. For the opning race in Melbourne they would add some winglets and stuff and you wouldn‘t see any obertaking
List of things that will help to have better racing:
- Smaller cars
- Tyres that don't last the entire race
- Refueling
- No pay drivers
- More sound
- No fuel limits
- No DRS, those overtakes are worth nothing
- More tyre suppliers
- Allow to race when it rains
- More gravel traps in the circuits, mistakes should be punished
- More circuits like Baku
because Baku have a short DRS straight, and a lot of gravel?
So this will make the cars slower...?
These are Aerodynamic regulations, we have some engine regulations too
Yes 1.5-2 seconds slower according to the FIA.
Jayant Paul no vortex generator just messing the wind to the back so the chaser cant chase that easily bec of wind disturbance
At least we have more racing and cars would finally follow each other
So what the cars are a bit slower? You won't notice the difference anyway, atleast we'll get more overtakes and less boring races... hopefully.
Unless designers are forced to make the front wing elements run the full width you're still going to have problems with vortexes being thrown off the side of the car (the inside edge of the winglets creates a vortex travelling behind the wheels and is used to channel air down the sides of the car and create a buffer zone between the upper and lower side of the body to increase overall downforce, commonly known as the Y250 vortex). A simplified design will make the following car slightly less sensitive to dirty air but the vortex problem still exists and cars will still get stuck in an exclusion zone where they are unable to maintain cornering pace within 1-2 seconds of the lead car
How about the engine? I'm not expecting an engine with better performance, but an engine with better sound.... It's matter for the fun factor
2021 that will happen.
2021 still V6
Aries Pradana They're raising the RPM limit.
+Britton Kithcart Here's
In 2017, the FIA began negotiations with existing constructors and potential new manufacturers over the next generation of engines with a projected introduction date of 2021. The initial proposal was designed to simplify engine designs, cut costs, promote new entries and address criticisms directed at the 2014 generation of engines. It called for the 1.6L V6 configuration to be retained, but abandoned the complex Motor Generator Unit-Heat (MGU-H) system. The Motor Generator Unit-Kinetic (MGU-K) would be more powerful, with a greater emphasis on driver deployment and a more flexible introduction to allow for tactical use. The proposal also called for the introduction of standardised components and design parameters to make components produced by all manufacturers compatible with one another in a system dubbed "plug in and play". A further proposal to allow four-wheel drive cars was also tabled, with the front axle driven by an MGU-K unit-as opposed to the traditional driveshaft-that functioned independently of the MGU-K providing power to the rear axle, mirroring the system developed by Porsche for the 919 Hybrid sportscar.
I agree.1988 has 1.5 litr v6 turbo and sounds great.Now why not.
This will hopefully mean more even competition in the future. That being said, we need to make sure there is a balance between restrticting aero complexity and allowing engineers and designers to innovate. Perhaps less restrictions in ither areas of the regulations could allow the different chassis and engines to make for more interesting design along with better racing.
Giorgio Piola gli italiani dominano
Yuppi Do grandeee
Great job liberty media! You're actually listening to our suggestions and gripes. Can't wait for 2019 already
I like them widening the wings. But dislike heightening
hope that it'll still be lower than 2009-2016 rear wings.
It'll only be heightened by 20 mm
phew, thank god.
It will allow closer racing, and that's what I want
It will still be hard to overtake, put simply the sport is to fast.
For one second I was hoping they were announcing the return of the V12s, manual shifting and unlimited everything, guess I was wrong.
V12 are trash
Aries Pradana No they aren't, but they won't ever come back.
Only thing I don't like is the wider front wing will mean more front wing damage. Sometimes just the smallest touch will destroy someone's race.
All these teams and engineers must be beyond frustrated. They go through all the work designing, testing and developing the best car they can to have their own sport say we want your cars to be simpler and slower.
Yeah and the chef will just want to make small and easy meals
It just gives the engineers a challenge to find other innovations to make their cars faster than the other guys'.
Nobody said it was easy.
I think I would love regulations changes as a engineer...
New and fresh ideas and changes to find loop holes in the regulations...
Yup, I would absolutely love it
If you are a game designer you wouldn't like slightly improving the same game for years and years...you want to make a new game, a new challenge
Not sure it's the best comparison bit still...nothing wrong with regulation changes
I think F1 should take a look at what indycar is doing with under body downforce, and less complicated aero.
Front wing is too big
おかもこーへー Why?
[[Insert Name]] I think it increase the risk of minor collision .
Should be from inner tire to inner tire length
Well, it's a similar size to the wings back in 2008-2014, so any drivers from that era will be kind of used to it, and actually, the minor collisions now are more because of the small, complex and fragile endplates and devices, with a more basic design, it'll be sturdier and less likely to break from a small collision, so I don't think it will change as much
Ieuan McArthur Wings from 2009-2013 were 180cm wide, same width as cars
Reminds me of 2009. Simpler Aero introduced compared to 2008, and taller rear wings.
The problem is pitstop.. if f1 were to bring back refueling we won’t see alot of 1 stop in the race..
Blackjack 91 None of the teams seem to even entertain the idea of refueling unfortunately
Blackjack 91 yes that way we can get rid of all the on track overtakes
Americano Beans it’s because of cost savings issue that mid and lower team can’t afford have.. reason refueling was banned because of save cost and safety
Blackjack 91 unfortunately, that’s not gonna happen, cause of health and safety and the fuel fires that happen during refuelling, and I think the drivers are not gonna be happy staying in the pits longer, even though pit stop battles are good to watch
my thoughts exactly the cars should be racing each other as light as possible non of this racing when very heavy, then saving tyres when you could actually be racing because the car is nimble at the end of a race.
I wish that F1 invents DIS (Drag Incretion System) that defends a driver's position from the driver behind who has the Drag Reduction System so it can be fair, especially on the straightaways
Can't wait to V4 ENGINE car regulation, so F1 simply just engine reliability race !!
V4's aren't really a thing... they'd use a inline 4 or a flat 4 engine instead.
very happy about these changes. simplifying aero in IndyCar this year has made racing a lot more exciting, so hopefully it'll do the same here.
watching it in 2022: pathetic
I'd rather see pushes to update the tracks for better racing than taking the piss out of the engineers trying to advance what can be done in automotive engineering.
I still wish they'd rather keep the technical regulations entirely stable until 2020 as significant technical reg changes are set to come into effect for the following season anyway due to the '1.5 seconds slower lap times compared to this season' estimation. Hopefully, with the 2021 changes, we would be able to get both the lap times back to the 2017-18 levels as well as the cars being significantly more following-friendly/race-able than they've been for a long time. If these short-term interim changes were to fail to make any difference at all to the difficulty of following another car closely, i.e., things would remain precisely the same as now with the more complex front wings, etc., then the 1.5-second loss in lap time would be even more annoying.
TheJokerit19 as a viewer you don't see any difference when cars are slower 2 seconds or even 5 seconds. But you see there 's no action in race. And that's why it is important to reduce the aerodynamics. We are all F1 fans because of races and not free quick hot laps in FP or Q
Wrong, a difference of 5 seconds in lap time is indeed very noticeable. Anything starting from 2 seconds or even lower than that can be rather easily noticeable to the naked eye especially when comparing two laps with that big difference side-by-side. Furthermore, concerning the last part of your reply: I indeed am a fan of F1 also because of free quick hot laps in qualifying, and or free practice, not only because of the races, i.e., I do care a lot about the lap times as well, which is why I hope that with the next significant technical regulation changes we could have both the lap times in the 2017-18 levels, as well as, significantly more followable/race-able cars.
Bring back re fueling , cars heavy or light depending on race strategy , ban the " party mode" qualifying settings , put a limit on bhp of the engine , another tyre manufacturer on some teams would also be interesting.
Honestly, it doesn‘t matter which car, I‘ll win! But max will still play pingpong with anyone!
Target locked.
This is gonna be fun
Forza Ferrari Lord Vettel
Sebastian Vettel 😂😂😂😂
CHAMPİON VETTEL
Following the 2018 IndyCar changes - especially on the front wing simplification and encouraging floorpan downforce
That’s a nice vacuum cleaner
Why is it a vacuum cleaner?
Cause Gran Turismo 4 (ignore this)
@@Shebbi04 Maybe becouse of that wide front wing ...
Oh, those look so much better. Especially the rear wing. Incredible!
Back to the past. The old good times...
I think what they should do is have two different "trims".
One for qualifying which has all the detailed aerodynamics of the 2018 chassis and another for the actual race which has all the changes for next year.
I'm just not sure if they can just switch out the parts because maintaining a total of 4 cars per team will be super expanding.
Ditch Monaco and race some where, well maybe somewhere there is some racing. Not trotting around an expensive town
So Canada should be removed too. That race was dog shit boring.
Tameem Webster well the Canada race. 2011 I believe it was. Most call the greatest race ever. Nearly 4 hours. Jenson button crashing into Hamilton. Punctures. Penalties. Was at the back of the grid. Chased down vettel. Vettel made error and button won in extreme weather. That was a great race. Cars are too wide nowadays. By seeing how tightly everyone is packaging their cars there is some room to make them narrower and more agile.
No Canada needs to be removed along with Monaco.
Canada and Monaco are too small and the 2019 F1's are gonna be bigger so it'll be even harder to over take on these tracks next year so yeah, Canada and Monaco 100 percent need to be removed.
If you disagree with removing Canada you're just a Canada GP fanboy.
I agree Monaco is hell boring. I'm watching f1 for the racing, not for the scenery.
Nurburgring, since the cars are all safe now
You knows things are getting out of hand when you have air being blown through the car's axels lol
Yeah, I'm happy for these rule changes.
Some of these replies, yes it’s a waste of time the last few years if they making them slower again for next but you want to watch ANOTHER season of poor racing? Come on the only races which have been good this year is down to safety car intervention nothing else
Harry Banks 2 People aren’t aware of the sunk cost fallacy
Only decent race this season was Baku. :/
Has it been poor racing this year?
OffEfOne Pretty much been nothing but Vettel and Hamilton winning everything from pole.
deathrooster14 but Ricciardo won 2 and Hamilton was gifted victory at Baku, Bottas would have won if not for the puncture. The only ‘boring’ races has been Spain, Monaco and Canada
Good. I really hope this resolves the issue of cars being able to follow each other much more easily. And if it works, it needn't be changed later down the line!
We live in the year 2018 where we have the fastest F1 cars ever produced, we have to enjoy it because i think it won’t be anymore faster in the future.
A bit sad but if it can help for the show and overtakes, i take it!
You have X amount of DRS depending on the track but scrap the zones. You use it when and where you think you want to. This will give more control to the driver and choice over when they use their DRS to gain and advantage or not.
Liberty Media, how about smaller cars that can actually overtake each other..?
Please bring back refueling as well.. We want drivers actually pushing it rather than coasting it as they know that they won't be getting overtaken by anyone as others are doing exactly the same..
Less complicated cars to help the smaller teams compete and possibly add new teams..
DUDE SMALLER CARS MEAN LESS MECHANICAL GRIP AND WORSE CARS, fucking shit everybody talks out of their asses here
Haven't we done this already? 2008 -> 2009. The wider front wing made it impossible to be in traffic without being hit or puncturing someone's tire. The super tall rear wing just looked silly.
I really like the more simpler look.
J
Nationsa
,00
..
0
.
,989909
. ?jlpl9
I agree.Perhaps we re gonna See more overtaking and Side by sides,which is always good
Front wing changes: umm...sure
Bargeboard changes: woah whut
.
.
DRS/REAR WING CHANGES: NO TENKS
2019 season summed up. less aero so the teams with the big and fast engines will automaticly win every race :)
They can easily lower the DRS effect by shortening the DRS zone, however the DRS effect is too weak on some tracks, and there is no way to make it stronger except like this.
DRS:Unplug
Bargeboard:Bwoah
I just hope they mix and match the DRS perfectly per track so that we will have the actual overtake into the corner/braking zone and not on the straight :) (adding that each driver should also work for setting up the overtake and the overtake itself)
What a kindergarten comment
0:35 that front wing seems solid
became slower than this seasons.
doesnt matter if the cars are slower by a second or two, if the cars are actually racing again isnt that much more important? im sick of knowing who is gonna win the race before it has even started
And?
id happily take that for more intense races and i think everybody will
mad bird Well you are always going to find something to moan about aren't you?
I would prefer to trash all rules and make the cars as fast as technically possible. Basically cars that are too fast to be driven. That would mean that the talent the driver would be the key factor of winning. The more talented you are the more you can Go to the cars limit. Oh yeah and no fuel or tire limit
Not to sure about the rear wing change to make DRS more powerful. Think of tracks like Baku, China, Monza etc with huge straights were the current DRS already allows drivers to completely pass the other car on the main straight before the first corner. These changes will mean that a car can overtake on the straight even more easily. We want exciting overtakes, not boring straight line passes....
Soooo screw the innovation and all the work that the leading constructor teams have put in building these engineering masterpieces, in favor of the runner-up half ass teams?
Dmitry H It's for fans whining about no overtakes
Believe it or not some of us don’t won’t to watch boring races for another season if it’s closer all it means is more dependence on driver skill not car quality ... and that’s a good thing if your a true F1 fan
Pretty much, innovation is not liked by F1 Management
Dmitry H I love how everybody complains about little overtaking, and when they do something about that you complain again
Harry Banks 2 I'm glad someone has sense! Agreed.
The reason the narration falls behind the animations is because it came second. This was originally a Giorgio Piola video without narration.
This isnt really a big drawback in technology since aerodynamics are much less complex than parts like the engine or battery. The direction in which aero evolved was making thinner and smaller winglets from carbon fiber which could only get so small before they lose all effects. What im saying is that aero was a dead road and if these regulations stayed, room for improvement would be minimal
I'm assuming they've decided on this because of how much more competitive and exciting the road racing has become in Indycar after Indycar simplified the top aero and improved the underwing. F1 isn't really gambling with the new changes because it has already been proven to improve the racing in Indycar (which is a similar racing series in many aspects). Plus, more simple aero will allow for smaller teams to try and compete because aero development will be less expensive. If the cars are slower in the corners but drivers can actually compete and battle for position then it's a win win scenario. Drivers are happier and fans are happier.
how bout making the cars shorter or the tracks wider too so more possibilities for overtaking in corners instead of „oh straight and drs overtook“
Rip Red Bull Racing
This regulation change will give Adrain Newey a head ache.(?-?)
GT3, GT2, GTE, GT500 and LMP1 are more interesting racing categories imo.
or, you know, you could just use v10 engines at 20k rpm again, dump the hybrids, kers, drs and turbo... just saying.
Guilherme Schmidt which would Change nothing about the Aero therefore not increasing overtakes.
I'm not talking about aero
Guilherme Schmidt And what would that do make the racing more competitive?
F1 is supposed to push the limits in every way, not go back to the stone age
It would improve at least the sound and the speed!
Most of the changes make perfect sense, but increassing the width of the front wing will probably lead to more damaged front wings.
So all the research in aerodynamic that has been done in the past decades will be thrown away to prevent weak ass teams to go bankrupt? Nice, why don't you all race in go-karts you'll be all even there and it's cheaper than a F1 car.
Help me then, at this point why don't they make all the cars equal like in F2? (all the chassis are made by the same manufacturer)
so what do you want? a parade of the fastest cars in the universe? seriously?, be more empathic and if you don't understand the sport spend a little time educating yourself about what is this all about and how it really affects the show on the track, stop complaining
So you want backmarker team to go bankrupt?
I'm afraid the simpler front wing will make cars get closer because less dirty air, and then they will just pass on the straight with the even more overpowered DRS.
DRS was made to compensate for the dirty air. Now that we have less dirty air (2019), they make the DRS EVEN STRONGER. I'm scared. Back in the day you had to get a good exit, slipstream, a good maneuver, a good line and good braking to get past on a straight line with almost equal cars. Now it's all done with the press of a button.
A bit of DRS is fine, because F1 cars generate much dirty air, regardless of the simplicity. The wings are just very big.
Formula 1 was once the pinnacle of motorsport! Now it's just a laughing stock! We want the best tech and the fastest cars. Not the EU on wheels!
Andddd it’s still the pinnacle of racing sports. And what do mean “the best tech”. Formular 1 is not about who has the best tech but rather who can build the best machine which might involves some technologies. Another point, aren’t f1 cars the fastest cars on tracks right now or am i missing something.
Tuan Phong Nguyen nope the Porsche 919 evo recently lapped spa faster than a f1 cars lap record! easily. Give them all the banned tech like ground effect and skirts back and watch lap times fall and overtaking flourish! Makes more sense than making them slower than lmp1 cars.
matthew barclay First of all, why compare a TIME ATTACK fully upgraded lmp1 car with an f1 car? Second of all ground effect won't come back I'm afraid because the FIA thinks it's too unsafe.
AJW10 because it's the fastest track car in the world at this moment in time. Where as f1 are supposed to be the fastest track cars in the world! Kinda makes the whole conversation about f1 getting slower and more irrelevant alot more legitimate wouldn't you agree ? And the f1 car was in full quali mode so ?
matthew barclay That 'lmp1' car had was more easy to drive and as I said fully upgraded, no rules. F1 cars have never been this fast. If some company upgrades a 2017/18 F1 car it would smash that record again. Besides, F1 cars will probably get that record back this year anyway. Ground effect will indeed help for overtaking and speed, but the FIA just won't allow it.
lets hope this works. I was watching the v8 supercars yesterday (I know different type of car altogether) and during the race there was a moment where there was 4 cars all in the same corner trying to over take.
It was great and it struck me,, you don't even really see F1's going two wide into corners much these days, it happens sometimes but then the disturbance happens.
Hopefully the new aero changes makes going two wide and following close more of a possibility in 2019.
I'd like to see them consistently been able to follow only about 4-5 meters from each over with no or very minimal disturbance from the air.
Just get rid of DRS...
Cormacca What's the point? DRS gives a compromise - it allows high downforce around the track, and then lower downforce on the straights. Without DRS, constructors would have to focus purely on high downforce for the corners, or purely on low downforce for the straights.
Kian Stevens The point is - DRS creates artificial overtaking.
What's so bad about that
his point is, what happened to drivers being able to overtake normally?
Why?
Love these kinds of videos.
The car look ugly again..i don't like higher rear wing.
This rule makes it all about the pilot and not the car. And indeed its a great part, but I would like to see what limits engenieers are able reach to make the car out perform the others. Something like old lemans races.
Invece di migliorare sempre di più si torna indietro 🙈
almeno nel 2019 si vedranno delle gare interessanti...
Comi spero perché sennò è stato tutto inutile. Per colpa di questi nuovi regolamenti i team sono costretti ad interrompere prima lo sviluppo della vettura di quest'anno, praticamente bisogna rifare un telaio completamente nuovo e la aerodinamica sarà stravolta. Secondo me la FIA sta facendo troppi cambiamenti in questi 3 anni, si dovrebbero lasciare uguali le auto per almeno un paio di anni, e poi ci sono sempre meno motori e ,come ha detto Hamilton, sarebbe ridicolo che l'anno prossimo ci fossero solo 2 motori, così si correrebbe il rischio di pregiudicare una stagione dell'affidabilità e non sarebbe per niente bello.
Matteo Tonioll Tonioll il fatto è che la complessità dell' aerodinamica attuale crea dei vortici di "aria sporca" che non permette all' auto che segue di avvicinarsi oltre il secondo di distanza, per questo l'aerodinamica è stata semplificata, per permettere alle auto di gareggiare
aguj10 secondo me sta cosa dei 2 motori mi sembra un po' esagerata :D sono d'accordo con più modifiche che portino a più sorpassi ma neanche cose così forzate.. poi vabbe sono opinioni, ognuno c'ha la sua (:
Beh..se si torna indietro significa che allora c'erano regole più semplici che consentivano alle F1 di gareggiare. Le F1 moderne sono tecnologicamente super avanzate oggi, si parla da una decina d'anni di auto ibride ma la meccanica restameccanica, l'aerodinamica pure, e se l'opzione migliore fosse quella di tornare alla semplicità e pulizia di queste ultime, allora io sono per! :)
FOM still don't understand that not the quantity of overtakings is impossible. But the quality is. We need hard fights and no overtaking by pushing a DRS-button. But I agree with all changes up to 1:39.
That wouldn't work plus the cars will be slower like 2014 level
David D ELI
The changes are made for better racing not faster cars!
Would you rather see way faster cars and another race like Canada?
Only by 1.5 seconds. They'll probably be halfway between 2018 and 2014.
The goal isn't to make the cars as fast as possible it's to create better racing. Currently it's impossible to follow or have a serious attack on many circuits and between many cars. More attacks is better for the sport than another 2 seconds off a lap
dries3654 this year the cars are a almost a second faster than 2017 (except Baku) so maybe a little bit slower than the 2017. Maybe half a second or something like that.
David D ELI Nowhere near to that level, LOL. What pot have you been smoking? The lap times are estimated to only be 1.5 seconds slower compared this season, so they're still going to be 'significantly' faster than 2014, '15, and even '16 on most of the circuits. On most of the tracks, next season is set to only lose to this and last season but still remain ahead of all the pre-2017 aero-reg seasons. It'd be close with 2016 in Bahrain and Baku, but on the remaining five venues F1's been to so far this season besides those two, they're still going to stay comfortably ahead of 2016 in ultimate lap time pace especially in China and Spain.
Regulation changes introduced for 2009 to the front wing kind of worked, but the cars were still having a hard time following though. But soon after, teams were finding ways to add bits to the front wing with no intervention from the FIA. IMO they should bring back ground effect and get rid of that damn plank of wood underneath.
Replace halo with aeroscreen or shield!
You think they never considered that?
Aeroscreen and shield looks much more worst then the halo on the cars
i prefer the halo to any of those options, i am quite used to halo now in fact
are you high. go look at a video of indy car you newbie? the shield looks waaaay better then a flip flop
well the shield is not bad, i hadnt seen the indycar with a screen before - ther are not alot of images of it, but it looks okay - actually what i just found, is that clip of a red bull f1 testing an aeroscreen back in 2016 and that looks fine too, - i guess i was thinking some kind of full canopy covering which i would not like to see. I am sure in F1 the screen/shield idea was floated but for whatever reason they went with the halo - maybe it is the extra advertising space? or the screen option would not be sufficient to deflect flying tires?
I can say that... FORMULA 1 is returning to their state in 2000-2008 eras, which the cars back then wqs so simple... And has slightly larger rear wing than the newly introduced 2019 car regulation.