@@joeltucci1916 I don't mind the concept of remix drafts, but I recall them saying that the entire point of them was that they have a different theme each time. This is just the exact same draft as last time.
I love how interesting it is when the opponent plays the t1 bomb that grows despite having 7 removal spells in the deck, i dont have one in hand, so i lose
nope. the way you can tell is because the packs are not randomly sorted in this format, but rather setup to be more like a standard draft pack (1 rare, 3 uncommon, rest are commons). a cube is a list of however many cards, randomly divided and split up between packs with no regard for rarity. also, typically cubes are all singletons (unless it’s a set cube or other unique variation).
@mikebellsfitnessshorts2783 there's not a lot of creative stuff you can do in the format. It's pretty much beat down or be beat down with x y z choice of 2-color archetypes
@mikebellsfitnessshorts2783 It wasn't directed at me, but personally, i hate how often there are "non-games". There are some curve outs that just make playing that match boring (even if you are the one curving out)
@@mikebellsfitnessshorts2783pretty much no room for creativity. Find your lane in the draft and build a low curve if you want to win. A lot of the good commons/uncommons were only good in one color pair which just cemented the lanes. That’s my take.
@@boots4snootin571 Not true. There's tonnes of other types of decks now that Squirrels/Rabbits are so contested. Esper control is good, rat control is good, decks built around Builder's talent, mono blue Eluge, UR spells
My memory is it was a very good format and Nummy did play it a bunch
I did a quick 7-0 draft today of u/w flyers with three bone splitters . I also had thee relevant mythics but we won't mention those.
Dance with 14 lands was very ambitious
We got to see Dance of the Manse pop off, nice!
This is not a new version of the remix artifacts set, it's a flashback of the same one we had back in April.
30min draft, I can see the future! Sub for more predictions.
Qq
I went GB in the seat to the left of you. Pretty sure it was this draft, 7-2, thank you Nummy!
Drafted a deck yesterday that was very similar to yours, and also went 1-3. 😂
Yo I loved this set, I'm excited to play some more
I know you said we were done with bloomburrow draft.... but like. Maybe.
Day 2 of asking nummy to make a draft tier list
Make you could ask him once, and if he does, he does.
perhapsssss
i got 1-3 and then I gave up. Im just not cut out for these kinds of drafts
Yes!
I wish this had been cube instead 😞
Same, they tried this exact same thing before and it was exceedingly mediocre. But they can charge more gems for it so that’s what they go with
@@joeltucci1916 I don't mind the concept of remix drafts, but I recall them saying that the entire point of them was that they have a different theme each time. This is just the exact same draft as last time.
😊
I dont get p1p1 at all
time to go back to bloomburrow, atleast thats more interesting
I love how interesting it is when the opponent plays the t1 bomb that grows despite having 7 removal spells in the deck, i dont have one in hand, so i lose
By definition this is a cube. Cubes don’t have to all be rares
nope. the way you can tell is because the packs are not randomly sorted in this format, but rather setup to be more like a standard draft pack (1 rare, 3 uncommon, rest are commons). a cube is a list of however many cards, randomly divided and split up between packs with no regard for rarity. also, typically cubes are all singletons (unless it’s a set cube or other unique variation).
Definitely not a cube
Its kinda cubish come on
@@santiproductions9318 cubes can also be set up this way with rarity it just takes a lot of work 🤷♂️
No it’s not. In cubes cards are drafted out of a set pool of typically 360 or 540 cards, of which there is one copy of every card in the cube.
this format is trash. just give us cube wotc!!!
Watching this 30 min draft was infinitely more fun and entertaining than watching literally any bloomburrow draft 🫶🏻 thanks for switching it up!
I'm just curious, but what did you not like about Bloomburrow? I thought his 4/10 rating was pretty harsh.
@mikebellsfitnessshorts2783 there's not a lot of creative stuff you can do in the format. It's pretty much beat down or be beat down with x y z choice of 2-color archetypes
@mikebellsfitnessshorts2783
It wasn't directed at me, but personally, i hate how often there are "non-games". There are some curve outs that just make playing that match boring (even if you are the one curving out)
@@mikebellsfitnessshorts2783pretty much no room for creativity. Find your lane in the draft and build a low curve if you want to win. A lot of the good commons/uncommons were only good in one color pair which just cemented the lanes. That’s my take.
@@boots4snootin571 Not true. There's tonnes of other types of decks now that Squirrels/Rabbits are so contested. Esper control is good, rat control is good, decks built around Builder's talent, mono blue Eluge, UR spells