The MOST Cinematic Camera Settings - Part 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 414

  • @mattih
    @mattih  7 років тому +62

    Hey guys what are some things you would love to learn in the future????

    • @fajarramadhan8793
      @fajarramadhan8793 7 років тому +3

      TravelFeels mirrorless or dslr? On a low budget .. Thx btw for making helpfull videos

    • @MarkGildayJr
      @MarkGildayJr 7 років тому +5

      audio! balancing speech levels in interviews, compression, mixing with music, using Audition, etc

    • @sahorifilms
      @sahorifilms 7 років тому +1

      Thank you for this video!

    • @ibenjaminclarke
      @ibenjaminclarke 7 років тому +3

      How to get near perfect (if not perfect) focus for videos. Seems very simple but i look back at footage I've filmed or even pictures I've taken and they never look as focused as they do when I'm filming! Hope others agree and thanks for the great content!! Love this channel :)

    • @joshlorenzen
      @joshlorenzen 7 років тому +5

      We'd love more tutorials in After Effects about making your handheld videos more cinematic, for example. I'm a musician myself, and I shoot all of my music videos myself. Learned alot of new things from your videos lately, that I'm looking forward to try out!

  • @DutchAussieProductions
    @DutchAussieProductions 6 років тому +22

    Matti and Peter. You guys are great to watch. I have seen just about every video you made and thoroughly enjoyed watching them. I also learned a lot. Thanks. I am 78 and a beginner at video but will improve thanks to your efforts.

  • @tylerjustice5560
    @tylerjustice5560 7 років тому +370

    "piss off a gamer in one sentence"
    The brain can only process 24fps

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому +37

      😂 Process and tell the difference are two different things.

    • @DreamDigital
      @DreamDigital 7 років тому +31

      If you can tell the difference then you simply process the image at different speed.

    • @abdelrahmanhany4399
      @abdelrahmanhany4399 7 років тому +3

      Tyler Justice TRIGGERED

    • @eduards_mellups
      @eduards_mellups 7 років тому

      So what exactly is the difference? :D

    • @jhonsmith9443
      @jhonsmith9443 7 років тому +7

      You're not interacting with a video, while with a game you often interact a lot. With 24fps you will notice a lot of delay that you won't notice with 60fps. Video also has motion blur what is not always the case in games, this is especially the case in games where people care about fps. But, video's with a higher framerate often look smoother too. For example, the Hobbit has been filmed in 48 fps, you can read more about this here: facebook.com/notes/peter-jackson/48-frames-per-second/10150222861171558

  • @aswinbeats
    @aswinbeats 7 років тому +17

    Shooting at 24 fps adds a slight "blur" to the motion in the video, which gives it a "cinematic" feel. If you shoot at 60 fps, the video would look more "realistic" or like news/documentary. Took a while for me to figure this out. Now I always shoot at 24 fps unless I want a documentary-style look.

    • @BuildInRobloxStyle
      @BuildInRobloxStyle 6 років тому +1

      The blur completely depends on the shutter speed you are using lower frame rate makes things choppy lower shutter speed makes things blury. Furthermore most all the motion blur you see in movies is done in post. There is no connection between 24fps and "Cinematic" other than that's what they used for film and that carried over to digital.
      P.S. sorry for necro-posting...

    • @di3g04
      @di3g04 6 років тому

      I would say the combination of 24fps 180 degrees or 1/48 Sutter speed

    • @thetonycam3944
      @thetonycam3944 5 років тому

      Same here! Even with my documentary style project 24 fps looks just more watchable so I always shoot 24fps.

  • @gregj2305
    @gregj2305 7 років тому +76

    Put the speed to 1.25, you're welcome

    • @orionlk5701
      @orionlk5701 4 роки тому +2

      Thanks bro

    • @thefunnytech4612
      @thefunnytech4612 4 роки тому

      please can you elobrate this

    • @gregj2305
      @gregj2305 4 роки тому +5

      @@thefunnytech4612 The way he talks has an odd slowness to it, when I put the speed up to 1.25 he sounded a lot more natural. Not trying to bash on the guy or anything, its a great video and a lot of great information. I just found it easier to watch and listen at that speed.

    • @thefunnytech4612
      @thefunnytech4612 4 роки тому

      @@gregj2305 okk thats great

    • @aryanbiswas8602
      @aryanbiswas8602 4 роки тому

      but remember to slow down when peter comes in

  • @MangoMaddy
    @MangoMaddy 7 років тому

    Great video - I have question. I am new to vlogging and I am considering a new camera. I've narrowed down to GH5. Do you recommend it?

  • @DoktorKrok
    @DoktorKrok 7 років тому +3

    Flat Image as possible isn't always the best choice as you're using a 4:2:0 8-bit camera.
    When you lower the shadows and the contrast the image tends to pixelate and create noise when it shouln't exist.

    • @stokehauntedofficial
      @stokehauntedofficial 6 років тому +1

      we were told you only fix faults in post now it seems everyone films flat and posts bad practise for the pro industry and too time consuming

  • @katherinepinaphotographer
    @katherinepinaphotographer 3 роки тому

    Have to say, this was the most informative video about camera settings for cinema. Thank you so much!!!

  • @adrianocorrea3039
    @adrianocorrea3039 7 років тому

    Amazing Vídeos !!! Thank u so much ! I have Sony too but why did you prefer s-log2 than s-log3 ?

  • @johnwilcox7826
    @johnwilcox7826 7 років тому +5

    in the early days of silent films the frames rates were around 15 frames per sec
    when sound arrived they found the film was running at a speed that resulted in poor sound quality
    they increased the frame rate to a point when they could get acceptable sound quality without costing a large amount of money in film
    this happened to be 24frames per second
    they would have loved to go to a higher but the cost was the killer
    frame judder has always been a problem with 24fps when anything moves across the frame
    movie cameramen go to great lengths to avoid this

  • @pragav2170
    @pragav2170 4 роки тому

    Thanks a lot @Matti... Watched both parts..
    Wow...Loved every bit of information and the way you delivered it, mate. Very clear and explanatory. I can right away pick up my camera and start shooting.
    And the recaps. Brilliant. !!! Just wow... Thanks again...

  • @HolywellFilms
    @HolywellFilms 4 роки тому

    Love your channel Matti. I've learnt so much from watching your videos. I'm a short movie maker, writer, director, producer, actor, editor, etc but knowing about camera and settings are my weakness but I'm getting there, thanks to you. Keep up the good work. ;)

  • @lokalongoods2018
    @lokalongoods2018 7 років тому

    This is the channel that I'm looking for. I learned so many things about filmmaking and I thank you so much! This is my dream and I hope to be good as you someday.

  • @1063Days
    @1063Days 7 років тому +1

    Would you recommend I set the color profile on my Nikon D3300 to neutral and turn down the contrast and saturation to achieve a flat look?

  • @kamotionmarketing
    @kamotionmarketing 6 років тому +1

    So what's happening with your video when you play it back on a television set? Television sets are playing it back or most of them are at 30 p so I when you shoot a video at 24p is it faking some frames in there in order to come up with their 30p And if you know that your intended audience is going to be watching it on a television set.... it would you not just shoot it at 30 P to start with?

  • @UrantiabookfilmsOrg8
    @UrantiabookfilmsOrg8 7 років тому

    Very nice presentation--thank you. My understanding is that 24fps is about the maximum that the brain can handle because the optic nerve actually samples the visual input to the eye and sends the data to the visual cortex for processing in bursts. In the midst of a crisis--such as while having an automobile accident--adrenaline temporarily alters the sampling rate and we feel as if we're seeing things in slow motion. It's because the sampling rate has increased.

  • @oliscurra
    @oliscurra 5 років тому +1

    So if you've got 23.98, 24 vs 25 (which seem like nuances), what do you go for?

  • @roccotalamantes7297
    @roccotalamantes7297 5 років тому +2

    What about filming in 29, or 30 fps so we can use slowmo... and then export in 24?

  • @Melandjona
    @Melandjona 7 років тому +3

    Now this is a series we're looking forward to! Keep this coming.

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому

      Thanks so much for watching! 🙏

  • @Seebob86
    @Seebob86 5 років тому

    Hey Matti, I have got a question. Which aperture should I choose if I want to shoot landscape? I don't want the background to be blurred,I need a high depth of field. This means I need higher values like f 5-8 right? Greetz

  • @paulmustarde7175
    @paulmustarde7175 7 років тому

    You discuss using 24 fps normally, and switching to 60fps for slow mo. That means you are sort of committing to one or the other right at the point of shooting. of course you can speed up the slow mo to give normal speed but it doesn't look the same as 24fps does it? I see in your films that you dip in and out of slow mo alot. how do you decide, when out shooting, which fps to use in different situations? Thanks

  • @IstoryangPagibig
    @IstoryangPagibig 7 років тому +1

    Stupid question but...if I want a slowmo, I should shoot it in 60fps, put it on a 24fps timeline and export in 24fps?

    •  7 років тому +1

      Neil Mutia Yes

  • @SpelledKrystal
    @SpelledKrystal 6 років тому

    Your videos as well as Peters are like BUTTER.

  • @MartinFriedrich73
    @MartinFriedrich73 7 років тому

    Hi. Great Channel! Thx for all efforts. Which source for sound / music do you use?

  • @SBKProductions
    @SBKProductions 6 років тому

    So do you take pictures in neutral or the Flat profile s-Log?

  • @LPvonBayerncraft
    @LPvonBayerncraft 6 років тому

    @Matti Haapoja i think the problem with 24fps (and that is why 60fps looks smoother) ist that the moment when your eye is "taking" a picture and the moment when the screen "sends" a picture arent allways the same
    same as playing on a PC with 120fps but a 60Hz Screen. The screen wants to send a picture but the pc is not sending one. That problem or better to say its less often the case that this happens so we think the video is smother
    hope my bad English is understandable

  • @feridunkizgin3636
    @feridunkizgin3636 7 років тому +1

    Thank you for yours helpful vids. I m french guy and my english isn't so good ! But if i'm not wrong i don't see the part that you speak about f stop suggestion and iso as well !! Thanks again !

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому

      Thanks for watching! Thats in Part 2 👌

  • @BAMAVLOGS
    @BAMAVLOGS 6 років тому

    THIS VIDEO WAS A GEM FOR ALL THOSE NEW IN FILM MAKING. THANKS MATTI

  • @delas0ul
    @delas0ul 7 років тому +1

    good stuff, cant wait for part 2. i've been following your uploads and i've learned so much! thinking about signing up for your course.

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому

      So good! Definitely check the course out I'm sure you'll learn a lot 🙌

    • @delas0ul
      @delas0ul 7 років тому

      TravelFeels just about to purchase the luts, compatible on FCPX?

  • @jajaoooh3251
    @jajaoooh3251 7 років тому

    I'm using a Canon 60 d, with a tamron lens 17mm-55mm lens, I'm not sure that my camera can shoot in log but there is a neutral setting. Would this be the right setting to choose as you said some cameras can't take log, or flat images being tweaked in post?

  • @hunge
    @hunge 7 років тому

    G'day, I have the E-M10 and wondering what adapter I would need, so I can use my Canon lenses or Nikon lenses?

  • @akashkhairal
    @akashkhairal 7 років тому

    Sir,
    Do you use Davinci Reslove for color grading. OR have you ever used it. And if yes , will you make a tutorial of it?

  • @rubybourne5968
    @rubybourne5968 7 років тому

    Hey Matti. Great video as always. I did have a nooby question. I shoot at 24fps on my phone and 60fps on my gopro. How should I render the final video, still on 24fps? Thanks! :D

  • @RyanAnthonyDigitalMedia
    @RyanAnthonyDigitalMedia 7 років тому +1

    SLOG is not always the best PP to use in cameras because it usually has a minimum ISO setting of around 1,600 which is SUPER high. It's best to use a different flat PP that has no minimum ISO setting so you can set it to 100-320.

  • @WheresApollo
    @WheresApollo 7 років тому

    I shoot with the canon 80d on a landscape picture profile. Do you have any suggestions for what picture profile I should use without it being to flat??

  • @chrissearle6411
    @chrissearle6411 7 років тому +1

    What setting for colour profile would you recommend for the DJI P4? I've used both d-cinelike & d-log and I agree the d-log is hard to work with but I'd also say the d-cinelike has so much colour it's hard to grade/correct. Any suggestions?

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому +1

      Cinelike is the best option that Ive found. Still on the flat side but not too flat for the codec

    • @chrissearle6411
      @chrissearle6411 7 років тому +1

      Yeah I kinda liked the flat look of the d-cinelike on the P4 anyway and just use movement to create the depth I'm looking for. Thanks for getting back so fast I haven't even finished the video yet haha! Keep up the good work man!

  • @jablais4
    @jablais4 5 років тому

    I downloaded and installed a c-log type profile for my 1DX MKII. Have you ever played around with something like this with the 1DX MKII? Would you recommend staying with that or just using the neutral profile and flatten it? Thanks

  • @YoungBlaze
    @YoungBlaze 7 років тому

    what about 23.976

  • @iriofpod
    @iriofpod 7 років тому

    This is like the 8th video I see of yours the last 2 hours haha!
    Is it the same to shoot it at 60 fps and then in Premiere modify it to 24fps as shooting it directly in 24 fps? What do you recommend? Thanks!

  • @LiamDalley27
    @LiamDalley27 6 років тому

    Question - if your camera doesn't have a log profile but instead you just dial back the contrast and saturation etc when it comes to LUTS would you then use the LOG version or do you still use the REC709 versions? Thanks

  • @BokehMarket
    @BokehMarket 7 років тому

    Kudos for bringing on Peter McKinnon. Dude is a hero. Great channel TravelFeels, great channel.

  • @EricBandholz
    @EricBandholz 7 років тому

    enjoyed this video and it's nice to follow other Olympus users. I shoot my vlog with an EM5II and try to nail the color in camera to save time in post. For vlogging I'm at 30 fps, 1/60 shutter speed, and auto aperture and iso

  • @jackbotti
    @jackbotti 7 років тому

    QUESTION: Do you shoot stills in SLOG2 as well? Or no color prof

    • @popartmediaPL
      @popartmediaPL 7 років тому

      jack botti he shots in RAW - picture profiles only affect video

  • @evilsnake343
    @evilsnake343 7 років тому +1

    what is the song in the beginning? I shazamed but it keeps giving me songs that are not in the video

  • @nadiamahmood5893
    @nadiamahmood5893 4 роки тому

    Hi Matti! I have a question about focus settings for a cooking show-I’m having issues with the focus-my camera (canon 80D 18-55mm) keeps going in and out of focus causing some blurriness in the video clips-primarily my hands are in the shot (no face) and I have the camera on autofocus-many thanks if you can explain what I’m doing wrong!

    • @VegardThefilmmaker
      @VegardThefilmmaker 4 роки тому

      Try set it up in manual focus. Or in autofocus try using a Wide setting for focus.

  • @joernsns
    @joernsns 7 років тому +3

    Dumb question: When you film with 60fps can you edit in post that its 24fps without getting slow mo?

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому +3

      Yep! you can just stick it straight into a 24fps timeline. BUT the footage will have a higher shutterspeed then if you filmed it at 24p and had shutterspeed 48 so thats the down side. Great question!

  • @vertusmatjaz
    @vertusmatjaz 7 років тому

    What about PAL (25fps)? That is used everywhere except in USA (NTSC = 30fps). Can you see difference between 24 and 25 fps ?

  • @Mvrderface
    @Mvrderface 4 роки тому

    got me thinking of something i never found. in raw photos white balance doesn't matter, why does it matter more in video? thanks.

  • @KingmonCreativewa
    @KingmonCreativewa 7 років тому

    Where did you get that poster thing behind you? lol I would like to buy that.

  • @dominiquethenosyreader2686
    @dominiquethenosyreader2686 7 років тому

    Does it matter what camera you use for short films and projects

  • @nickk6390
    @nickk6390 7 років тому

    you said the phantom 4 can't handle log. what profile would you use?

  • @allenadventures5407
    @allenadventures5407 7 років тому

    If you don't shoot log on a dji, What profile would you recommend?

  • @antidecepticon
    @antidecepticon 6 років тому +1

    The 48fps frame rate is so each eye can have its own 24fps film. The glasses are polarized 90 degrees and every other frame on the film is too. you only see one eye at a time but its at 24 fps so you don't notice. same for 120hz Tv is for 3d glasses. 2 60hz signals intertwined. =)

  • @elauadeinsf
    @elauadeinsf 2 роки тому

    The islands - in your intro, where the word 'INSPIRE' appears - where is that? I want to go there!

  • @matthewhassell
    @matthewhassell 7 років тому +1

    This might sound like a strange question but what if you live in the UK, most people will use the Pal setting on their camera which only lets you pick 25fps. is there much difference? also what happens if you use NTSC settings while living in the UK or vise versa?

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому +1

      Good question. It doesnt really matter 24 vs 25. PAL and NTSC are for broadcast. So if your stuff isnt going on TV it doesnt matter. And I'm not even sure it makes all that much of a difference even if it was going on TV. Not an expert here but I think thats how it is.

    • @Tuuuudels
      @Tuuuudels 7 років тому +1

      There's one more point you have to think of when you choose PAL/NTSC: The electricity got a different frequency in different countries, so you will mostly see those flickery lights when you choose the wrong setting.

    • @matthewhassell
      @matthewhassell 7 років тому

      Cheers for the reply. So with me being from the UK would i be better shooting in 25fps do you think

    • @matthewhassell
      @matthewhassell 7 років тому

      Cheers for the reply, So would you say they look pretty much the same? Obviously with me being from England Ive always been used to just picking Pal settings on electrical stuff.

    • @anttiheik
      @anttiheik 7 років тому

      There actually is a very important difference, at least in shooting slow motion. The electrical grid in Europe (and most of the world except USA) is 50Hz, so if you shoot under fluorescent lighting with a shutter speed that is not a multiple of 50, you will get horrible flicker in your video. Learned this the hard way... 🙄

  • @w500nm
    @w500nm 7 років тому

    The thumbnail of this video has a lumix and some lens, what lens is that?

  • @maksymilianbylica2532
    @maksymilianbylica2532 7 років тому

    Another great movie! Thank you for your knowledge. I love all of your things. I'm just a little bit confused about what you told about 60fps. I thought that if your camera has got a 60fps that's great. I even saw a Peters video where he's describing one cameras conviniences and he mentioned that this camera's got 60fps. I treated it like an advantage. Am I wrong? I'm not an english fluent speaker, maybe I did not unterstand what exactly he said. If I don't, pardon me for this mistake :) Cheers, and keep updating!

  • @akshayostwal1614
    @akshayostwal1614 7 років тому

    very genuine content!
    i wanted to know your perspective on different ways of storytelling.
    I'm an aspiring travel filmmaker and your response your really uplift my sense of knowledge.
    keep creating 🙌🙏

  • @harrysanders4322
    @harrysanders4322 7 років тому +1

    What watch is that?

  • @youtuberyoutuber2495
    @youtuberyoutuber2495 4 роки тому

    What camera settings (like color and audio etc...) does Nickelodeon use for their shows?

  • @livefreeaudio1834
    @livefreeaudio1834 6 років тому

    Now when you say conform it to 24 FPS are you saying I can shoot all my videos in 60 FPS then in premiere for the settings of the project set it to 24 FPS?Also, what FPS do you vlog and shoot B-roll with?

  • @WilliamMcAlpine777
    @WilliamMcAlpine777 7 років тому

    I have a Canon Legria HF R706. I'm trying to get the BEST results from it!

  • @SamuelHeinrich
    @SamuelHeinrich 6 років тому

    I think that the human eye can only see 24fps when it comes to motion and the blur it creates. However, when looking at a screen where the LEDs just change their color, there isn't much movement at all. That's why we can tell the difference between a 24fps video and a 120fps video. That's just what I think though. Feel free to correct me :)

  • @ed-roberts
    @ed-roberts 7 років тому

    Do you use 24fps for drone footage too?

  • @jacquelinejackson5191
    @jacquelinejackson5191 3 роки тому

    Teacher, I was looking for a video for camera settings for the look of cinematic images, direct me if you can, thanks

  • @diyowl5496
    @diyowl5496 7 років тому +1

    Thanks Matti! All of these tips are really useful! Keep up the good work! Subscribed!

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому

      So good! Welcome to the channel. Its good to have you here 🙌

  • @justinromero3655
    @justinromero3655 7 років тому

    Do you only edit on Adobe Premiere ?

  • @matthill4063
    @matthill4063 6 років тому

    Hey Matti, I love your channel man, I find it really helpful! One question: when I go travelling and filming, for some shots I will want slow motion but some others I will want normal speed but I won't necessarily know which shots I will want in slow mo until I'm editing in post back home. Do you think it would be better to just always film in 60fps at 1/120th so that I have the flexibility when I get home or should I try constantly changing the settings and try and plan which footage I will want in slow motion? I just don't want to get home, realise I filmed in 24 or 30fps on some shots where it would have been nice to slow it down?

  • @theuruguayanpolyglot8706
    @theuruguayanpolyglot8706 2 роки тому

    Thank you very much Matti! The video was super useful

  • @federer0
    @federer0 7 років тому

    I would like to se examples of what you are talking about. Is a very interesting topic and with footage showing what you mean would be a lot better. Thank you though for giving us your insight

  • @justinjdcruz
    @justinjdcruz 7 років тому +1

    i feel more confident taking advice from you, your work is great!!

  • @kyleharvey3902
    @kyleharvey3902 7 років тому +3

    Great video, I like the approach that you took with this by not only telling what settings Hollywood uses but a little bit into why. Looking forward to seeing the next video! personally being a Sony guy as well id love to see more stuff about the settings that you use specifically for the Sony and why you use those. I haven't been able to find a good breakdown video yet for that.

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому

      Thanks man! 🙏 Slog2 and other then that I told you everything in this video 👌

  • @fandjproductions
    @fandjproductions 7 років тому

    What profile would you recommend for the mavic?

  • @KaisarKhan87
    @KaisarKhan87 5 років тому

    Which watch are you wearing?

  • @fahmidakarobifahmida1116
    @fahmidakarobifahmida1116 5 років тому

    what lens will be perfect for getting most cinematic look.

  • @quonellama8769
    @quonellama8769 7 років тому

    what do you think about panasonic g7?

  • @oublckoficial5869
    @oublckoficial5869 6 років тому

    Always Helpful Matti!!!!

  • @cosplayintampabay1624
    @cosplayintampabay1624 6 років тому

    That background behind you where did you get it?

  • @martinparzenfilm3498
    @martinparzenfilm3498 6 років тому

    when i mix it up in one scene, means slow motion and fast or double speed parts, should i film with 60 fps right ?
    thxx

  • @miggysilvestre
    @miggysilvestre 4 роки тому

    Does log means standard?

  • @nicovargas2072
    @nicovargas2072 6 років тому

    Is this a full frame?

  • @leticialomp87
    @leticialomp87 7 років тому

    Please explain what's a log profile

  • @Wanpis46
    @Wanpis46 7 років тому

    what is the easiet editing software for creating movie?

  • @YunProductionCanada
    @YunProductionCanada 6 років тому

    I'd say it's more of balance between cost and quality back in film era. Also making 24fps gives you dream like/illusion and sense of story. Which we call Cinematic look.

  • @dauph6252
    @dauph6252 7 років тому +1

    sweet info can't wait for part 2!

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому

      Coming reallll soon! 🙌

  • @JaredIsham
    @JaredIsham 7 років тому

    The 24fps standard also has to do with sound and how it was able to sync with the picture. I think they said 48fps looked the most realistic but because it was film and back in the day the cut it in half to 24fps.
    Now 24fps is the look we are all used to. Also, I think 24fps looks the best. 😉
    For TV the sound sync and the frame rate had to do with the electric cycle 60hz North America (others too I think) 29.97fps NTSC 50hz Europe 25fps PAL.

  • @momustafa321
    @momustafa321 7 років тому

    We need lessons on have to make cinematic look with drones like you did in Iceland and settings

  • @ryanhelle4572
    @ryanhelle4572 5 років тому

    Can i shoot 24fps and slowmo the footage?

  • @BarryMaskell
    @BarryMaskell 7 років тому

    It originally came down to cost - 24fps was adopted because film was expensive and this was the least amount of frames they could get away with without the movies becoming choppy

  • @xantlin3323
    @xantlin3323 5 років тому +12

    Take a shot every time he says “24 frames per second”

  • @305Free
    @305Free 7 років тому +1

    Can you do the GH4 cinematic Camera Settings?

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому +1

      CineD I believe is what I use. I find the Vlog isnt so good with the codec and a bit wonky with colors at times. Other then that this video is all you need to know!

    • @305Free
      @305Free 7 років тому +1

      TravelFeels
      Ok thanks do you have numbers for aperture and Shutter Speeds and iso you recommend for best cinematic look?

  • @uglynerfherder
    @uglynerfherder 4 роки тому

    A lot of using 24 fps is because of the accurate motion blur you get when comparing to our normal vision. Using 24 fps also allows VFX artists to work at a faster pace.

  • @zjapp
    @zjapp 7 років тому

    whats the difference between 24 vs 25fps?

  • @FairDinkumAussieBloke
    @FairDinkumAussieBloke 6 років тому

    From what I researched, 24fps was originally used to save money during the recession in the 30's. They discovered that 24fps was the slowest they could go without losing the natural look and it just became the standard!

  • @michellev.8964
    @michellev.8964 7 років тому +1

    thank you for going in depth, i needed this!

  • @skraghav22
    @skraghav22 7 років тому

    can i shoot on LUT profile on canon 80D

  • @Nqrgaard
    @Nqrgaard 7 років тому +35

    Once I read that 24 was chosen because at that time every picture cost money and to stay on a budget they used 24 instead of 30 😊
    That makes sense too

    • @mattih
      @mattih  7 років тому

      Yea Ive heard all sorts of things but I think theres more to it then a silly reason like that. Otherwise it wouldn't have stuck

    • @Nqrgaard
      @Nqrgaard 7 років тому

      I think it is because the frame rate is perfect and "because we always have done it like that" ish
      The frame rate is of course chosen right at that time, because it is the highest frame rate the brain can handle and around the lowest before it looks unnaturally. It is stupid to pay for 360 frames extra pr. minut to get 30 frames and these last frames doesn't make a difference.
      Every frame at that time costs money, so these was worth saving.
      If you take a look at even older film where the frame rate is lower it feels unnaturally.

    • @dansedran
      @dansedran 7 років тому +10

      24 was chosen because that was the slowest speed motion images could be played at while still being able to sync with audio at that time. Which yes was also to save money on film. People got used to it and it standardised and here we are today :)

    • @Juone87
      @Juone87 7 років тому +3

      Film isn't a cheap medium, this was one of the key factors when the standard was decided - the least amount of frames per second to achieve the illusion of motion was determined to 24. One roll of film can only have certain amount of frames and this also limited the duration of a take. Alfred Hitchcock did a "one take" feature called ROPE which was impossible (or too expensive) to do in one take by that time. He used hidden cuts - same kind of method was used in Birdman but with much better hidden cuts/transitions.

  • @Jordanlehman
    @Jordanlehman 6 років тому

    I’m shooting a music video and I want to slowmo the intro part but when I filmed using 24fps and then slowed it down in adobe premier I was getting a weird glitch in the bottom corners so I tried to film it in 60fps which fixed the problem, just curious to what other people would suggest filming something like that in?

    • @BuildInRobloxStyle
      @BuildInRobloxStyle 6 років тому

      Always shoot the highest possible frame rate when planning on slowing it down in post. 60fps is the minimum for slow motion video, reason being is that you can half the speed to get 30 fps, 120fps allows you to do 1/4 realtime and it just goes up from there. I say highest possible because most camera can only do 60fps at 1080. I hope this helped.

  • @aritrapramanik1988
    @aritrapramanik1988 7 років тому +2

    That's a bit misleading Matti coz all along Peter was holding a GH5! xD

  • @UlreyProductionsfilm
    @UlreyProductionsfilm 6 років тому

    how much gh5 vido did end up in peter's vlog if any