I lived so much time without a decent Internet connection, and outside of the milsim community. It's amazing to be catching up with the games that we have today and the ones we will have in the future.
Depends on the price, but I'd be willing to check it out. Nothing shown so far really stands out as being very unique. We've gotten a dozen or so tactical shooters in the last 4-6 years, all with varying levels of "milsim" features. Let's see some prioritization of mod support and I'm much more interested.
@@GG_SpaceGhost You’re not wrong! Though knowing the caliber of development team I’d say this one will stand out amongst the crowd. It may not be balls to the wall at launch but it might be close. I believe he said something about mod support in future but right now they’re focusing on nailing the core gameplay.
no singleplayer makes it irrelevant. we already have a surfeit of realistic high quality multiplayer tactical military games. ground branch, ready or not, grayzone, arma reforger, squad, etc to name a few. what sets this apart?
Sometimes if they just get them to work would be amazing how long Tarkov been around and after update you still can't play that shit I'm excited and ready for a group of men that actually know what the hell they are doing.
The guys developing it all use tons of mods in the other games they play. I have no doubt they will bring in a ton of modders once they've got the base game sorted out.
warthunder like armor models not full detail but armor thickness and how shells effect the crews health specific to hit area, along with engine track and armorment being able to be disabeld
no talk about single player content and AI companions. If there is not im gonna play ARMA and old school Tom Clancy than another multiplayer reliant game.
So my issue is this: it will be easier to do this in Arma 4. It will literaly take 100x less hours and we'll have the same result but also millions of assets on top of that. And hey, I love Karmakut but his perspective on what's fun and not fun is really skewed by the fact he's a streamer. A specific type of streamer. I just have hard time believing it will translate to a product that will be liked by more people.
That’s a fair assessment, and I feel that’s where the rest of his team is there to course correct and provide that internal feedback should it get off the rails. We’ll see how it turns out!
I’m really really looking forward to this, second I have a chance to support I’m going too. Looks like what I hoped Squad was gonna be, but looking at stuff like Road to Vostok and the like, seeing the changes happen as the games developed; yeah, I really can’t wait to support and be involved in this development.
@@johjoh9270 Fair, Arma is unmatched. I look at tactical shooters as games like this and Arma as military simulators. “Shooter” to me is just that, shooting and not much else. Arma is on a whole other level.
@@Viper1Zero I mean the problem is all these new tactical shooters forgot the "game" part along the way, like, not mean they shoudl be more arcade, but like, they have no game mode, no campagin, no servers, unless you join with a closed group you can do nothing, cool customization but tactical barbie on the end Even if the gunplay isn't the best, Arma got everything from the start, user created missions, official campaigns in plural (although not reforger), official gamemodes that servers can run etc Plus, I'm really skeptical on any youtuber running it, whatever they wish, games are not cheap nor simple to develop, I question wether any youtuber has sufficient funds to do so in the first place
Many of us would like to see: - Wild animals and predators that can interfere the events and outcome of a mission. - Human tracking capacity: leaving footprints, wheelprints, blood stains, altered vegetation and environment due to human presence. - Mission editor. - Standard price for an indie game.
I don't recall a single story from a war veteran or an experienced operative involving wildlife interfering the operation and changing its outcome. Maybe let's leave wars to people and keep wildlife in hunting sims for now. Maybe let's focus, for example, on civilian presence in AO and their often huge influence on military operations first, before focusing on absolutely marginal stuff.
Lets not forget that MILSIM is a niche - it already has features that will probably filter out most of the casual players - It will probably not be a big economical success, but it will be played
This looks pretty sick. Personally, I do prefer sim gameplay on all levels. My old unit had a few real world first responders and veteran medical personnel, so we went pretty hard with our implementation of ACE Medical, KAT and Pharmacy mods, which I thought was fun. I like when TCCC actually feels like it's a high stakes pursuit that is extremely time sensitive. But that's Arma; this is clearly geared more toward more typical tactical FPS gameplay, which I also enjoy. Having played a bit of all of the other devs games mentioned and feeling like all of them were sort of incomplete in one way or another, I'm excited to see what these guys produce together. That ATAK UI looks pretty freakin' awesome.
@@JesseArt I hear you, and there is definitely a huge audience that loves the advanced medical stuff and I’m glad they have their space where they can thrive and employ life saving actions. I liken that to when I’m on a high stakes CAS call and time is a factor
Every time we get super hyped "new MiLsIm tAcTiCaL sHoOtEr!" games, they end up fading out quicker than a fart in a tornado until the next one pops up. It's like DayZ--they all just take the same ideas and do a different take and then yeah sure it might be fun at launch for a bit, but again.....fades out of existence until the next "is this the next [insert name] killer?!" videos start coming out for the next title. I'll actually be excited about an Arma challenger. But so far all these so-called "big names" that everyone drools over and acts like are the end-all/be-all milsim gods just go for SQUAD or GroundBranch knockoffs. Fair enough if that is your thing, but man....when the hell are we going to find some of these so-called "big names" get brave enough to pool all that money, talent, and experience to give Arma a run for its money?! I LOVE Arma and have always since first playing Armed Assault's demo back in the day, but Bohemia NEEDS real competition finally. :\
I don’t honestly know if there IS an Arma killer, ya know? The only thing that could kill Arma IS a better Arma, at least in my eyes. Reforger is really great for what it does but is it the killer of Arma 3? Eh I dunno, not without an offline editor tbh. We’ll see how this all pans out, I just like supporting friends who want to create new things for the community.
Hi, what about some tank modes for Arma 3, I just discovered the Zeus airstrikes and arty sisteme there and I want to start ,,cratering the map" like you said :)
The issue is that this can just be a mod in Arma and maps can be made in the new infusion engine. So I see the potential but at the same time it's tough. ARMA also has AI Reforger AI has improved a lot(still needs a lot of work) but no vehicles ? No helis ?
As someone who came into the milsim community from PR Bf2 beta, I’m cautious of creator crowdfunded dev projects. Squad, for the first 5+ years, was basically not worth playing.
My biggest hope is that it comes out and doesn't need DLSS to get to 60 fps at 1080p like a lot of the games coming out recently. Other than that only time will tell if this game is for me. I like how all the ideas sound so far. I just wonder how it will all interact with each other once it is out in the wild. There are so many more factors that will determine whether this succeeds in the stuffed MILSIM market. I hope it finds it's place and I hope it shakes things up in a good way. I would love if it lit a fire under the butt of other game dev teams out there.
I personally do not like the position of the weapon and the animation of carrying the rifle, I would like it to be positioned in the middle of the screen instead of standing in the right corner and in the options we can set it to be closer or further away from the player's body so that the whole rifle can be seen and to insert a free aiming deadzone which would lead to the fact that when you go left you see the left side of the gun and when you go right you see the right side of the gun, similar to Bodycam
I was trying to make the mod in OHD and it looked quite nice and the gameplay itself is much more believable. I really enjoyed it. And like this, when I see this old way of weapon animation that is fixed in the lower right part of the screen, it disgusts me so much. Somehow the games have progressed graphically, but the animations have remained the same as they were 20 years ago
Seems like there's a lot of Dev's some single and some in teams who are capable of takingvthe tools and engines out there to create what would of been a jaw dropping looking game a handful of years ago. Still awaiting that team who can produce a relatively decent enemy A.i though, as that appears to be where the majority fall down big time. There's far to many multiplayer games that have nothing to sustain them long term and such a massive market out there for single player friendly stuff.
with a team with that kind of resume, proper management is going to be key. to many passion projects have collapsed or delivered a barely functioning product because of piss poor management
I’m only hoping it runs faster than a powerpoint slideshow. 3DMAs models are too detailed and over complicated. I’ve only seen guys run their assets in Arma for artwork projects.
Seems cool but after waiting years for GroundBranch to become half-decent, my faith (or at least willingness to engage) with a startup project is pretty thin. They tend to be great concepts, but it’s 99% perspiration to 1% inspiration.
Another multicam bros game with high tech gadgets, fidgeting around walls and jungles, very Special Ops, such pmc, wow...in all seriousness, the genre needs a new vibe, but this looks like any other game that sells The Milsim Experience.
why every tactical shooter content creator wants to make their own game? Seriously best of luck for that, but I want to play it for myself not for my grandson. If possible, they all should make mods for ARMA 3 or any other existing game with their own CDLC. We will pay for that. Now I'm tired of this, "hey guys I am making new game and we will change the tactical shooter scene. Please support me."
Another shooter without controller support EXCLUDING GAMERS WITH DISABILITIES DEPRIVING US FROM BEING ABLE TO JUST PLUG AND PLAY WITHOUT MUCH OR ANY HASSLE 😮😢SUCH A DAM FCKIN SHAME REALLY!!!.
I mean hes right though. Karmakut has made a different game before and it didnt turn out well. This game just sounds like Squad, will probably turn into a clusterfuck community like squad
I lived so much time without a decent Internet connection, and outside of the milsim community. It's amazing to be catching up with the games that we have today and the ones we will have in the future.
Depends on the price, but I'd be willing to check it out. Nothing shown so far really stands out as being very unique. We've gotten a dozen or so tactical shooters in the last 4-6 years, all with varying levels of "milsim" features. Let's see some prioritization of mod support and I'm much more interested.
@@GG_SpaceGhost You’re not wrong! Though knowing the caliber of development team I’d say this one will stand out amongst the crowd. It may not be balls to the wall at launch but it might be close.
I believe he said something about mod support in future but right now they’re focusing on nailing the core gameplay.
And all being multiplayer only
no singleplayer makes it irrelevant. we already have a surfeit of realistic high quality multiplayer tactical military games. ground branch, ready or not, grayzone, arma reforger, squad, etc to name a few. what sets this apart?
Sometimes if they just get them to work would be amazing how long Tarkov been around and after update you still can't play that shit I'm excited and ready for a group of men that actually know what the hell they are doing.
The guys developing it all use tons of mods in the other games they play. I have no doubt they will bring in a ton of modders once they've got the base game sorted out.
*What are your thoughts on Bellum?* What features would you love to see??
warthunder like armor models not full detail but armor thickness and how shells effect the crews health specific to hit area, along with engine track and armorment being able to be disabeld
@ Hmm that would be cool to see implemented in a tactical shooter like this. Maybe loss of limb if not address medically?
bro, this is his second game... , looks like he is again try to farm money
Environmental destruction. It just makes gameplay more engaging. Just imagine the pure chaos a .50 cal can bring as it destroys your cover.
@@xztwinzx What was his first?
Awesome video like always
@@MrBruceleroy1974 Thank you my friend!
the game sounds sick! and thank YOU for producing these videos keep it up.
no talk about single player content and AI companions. If there is not im gonna play ARMA and old school Tom Clancy than another multiplayer reliant game.
Same for me.
I think that this is going to be absolutely amazing
@@midnightxx95 It’s already looking awesome, I’m gonna keep an eye on it!
So my issue is this: it will be easier to do this in Arma 4. It will literaly take 100x less hours and we'll have the same result but also millions of assets on top of that.
And hey, I love Karmakut but his perspective on what's fun and not fun is really skewed by the fact he's a streamer. A specific type of streamer. I just have hard time believing it will translate to a product that will be liked by more people.
That’s a fair assessment, and I feel that’s where the rest of his team is there to course correct and provide that internal feedback should it get off the rails. We’ll see how it turns out!
Looks incredible.
@@adamesposito3662 hell yeah it does, definitely snagging this one
this looks like a fabulous mix of ground branch, arma, Ready or not..all the good stuff!!! just hope it wont JUST be a 100 vs 100 PvP game
3:56 I love you style that not bring a gun to a bomb fight😂
Hopefully this won't be a bluedrake situation
What’s a blue drake situation
@@neosporin5608 go down the rabbit hole its bad and not easily explained lmaoo
I’m really really looking forward to this, second I have a chance to support I’m going too.
Looks like what I hoped Squad was gonna be, but looking at stuff like Road to Vostok and the like, seeing the changes happen as the games developed; yeah, I really can’t wait to support and be involved in this development.
I might keep an eye on it, but I don't really trust the whole "best new tactical shooter" anymore unless it comes from Arma
@@johjoh9270 Fair, Arma is unmatched. I look at tactical shooters as games like this and Arma as military simulators. “Shooter” to me is just that, shooting and not much else. Arma is on a whole other level.
yeah i'm hopeful from afar
@@Viper1Zero I mean the problem is all these new tactical shooters forgot the "game" part along the way, like, not mean they shoudl be more arcade, but like, they have no game mode, no campagin, no servers, unless you join with a closed group you can do nothing, cool customization but tactical barbie on the end
Even if the gunplay isn't the best, Arma got everything from the start, user created missions, official campaigns in plural (although not reforger), official gamemodes that servers can run etc
Plus, I'm really skeptical on any youtuber running it, whatever they wish, games are not cheap nor simple to develop, I question wether any youtuber has sufficient funds to do so in the first place
yes, we know what happens when a youtuber promises they will deliver a tactical shooter better than squad or project reality...
Damnit! "YT MILSIM influencer making their own game" wasn't on my bingo card for 2025
Many of us would like to see:
- Wild animals and predators that can interfere the events and outcome of a mission.
- Human tracking capacity: leaving footprints, wheelprints, blood stains, altered vegetation and environment due to human presence.
- Mission editor.
- Standard price for an indie game.
I don't recall a single story from a war veteran or an experienced operative involving wildlife interfering the operation and changing its outcome. Maybe let's leave wars to people and keep wildlife in hunting sims for now. Maybe let's focus, for example, on civilian presence in AO and their often huge influence on military operations first, before focusing on absolutely marginal stuff.
Lets not forget that MILSIM is a niche - it already has features that will probably filter out most of the casual players - It will probably not be a big economical success, but it will be played
If the game has an eden-style scenario editor, and modding tools released, it will be an assured purchase.
This looks pretty sick. Personally, I do prefer sim gameplay on all levels. My old unit had a few real world first responders and veteran medical personnel, so we went pretty hard with our implementation of ACE Medical, KAT and Pharmacy mods, which I thought was fun. I like when TCCC actually feels like it's a high stakes pursuit that is extremely time sensitive. But that's Arma; this is clearly geared more toward more typical tactical FPS gameplay, which I also enjoy. Having played a bit of all of the other devs games mentioned and feeling like all of them were sort of incomplete in one way or another, I'm excited to see what these guys produce together. That ATAK UI looks pretty freakin' awesome.
@@JesseArt I hear you, and there is definitely a huge audience that loves the advanced medical stuff and I’m glad they have their space where they can thrive and employ life saving actions. I liken that to when I’m on a high stakes CAS call and time is a factor
10/10 choice of music once again
Will there be single player in this game?
If this game come to consoles i definitely buy it
Every time we get super hyped "new MiLsIm tAcTiCaL sHoOtEr!" games, they end up fading out quicker than a fart in a tornado until the next one pops up. It's like DayZ--they all just take the same ideas and do a different take and then yeah sure it might be fun at launch for a bit, but again.....fades out of existence until the next "is this the next [insert name] killer?!" videos start coming out for the next title. I'll actually be excited about an Arma challenger. But so far all these so-called "big names" that everyone drools over and acts like are the end-all/be-all milsim gods just go for SQUAD or GroundBranch knockoffs. Fair enough if that is your thing, but man....when the hell are we going to find some of these so-called "big names" get brave enough to pool all that money, talent, and experience to give Arma a run for its money?! I LOVE Arma and have always since first playing Armed Assault's demo back in the day, but Bohemia NEEDS real competition finally. :\
I don’t honestly know if there IS an Arma killer, ya know?
The only thing that could kill Arma IS a better Arma, at least in my eyes. Reforger is really great for what it does but is it the killer of Arma 3? Eh I dunno, not without an offline editor tbh. We’ll see how this all pans out, I just like supporting friends who want to create new things for the community.
Hi, what about some tank modes for Arma 3, I just discovered the Zeus airstrikes and arty sisteme there and I want to start ,,cratering the map" like you said :)
The issue is that this can just be a mod in Arma and maps can be made in the new infusion engine. So I see the potential but at the same time it's tough. ARMA also has AI Reforger AI has improved a lot(still needs a lot of work) but no vehicles ? No helis ?
i think it looks good. ive been following bluedrake's game but its k.. I'll watch what karmakut comes up with
@@MoonCrawlerVG OHD was pretty ok at the start, I wasn’t really impressed with vehicle inclusion tho
As someone who came into the milsim community from PR Bf2 beta, I’m cautious of creator crowdfunded dev projects. Squad, for the first 5+ years, was basically not worth playing.
And it's not worth it once again after they removed ICO update
wasnt this game called Blue-something a year ago?
My biggest hope is that it comes out and doesn't need DLSS to get to 60 fps at 1080p like a lot of the games coming out recently. Other than that only time will tell if this game is for me. I like how all the ideas sound so far. I just wonder how it will all interact with each other once it is out in the wild. There are so many more factors that will determine whether this succeeds in the stuffed MILSIM market. I hope it finds it's place and I hope it shakes things up in a good way. I would love if it lit a fire under the butt of other game dev teams out there.
I personally do not like the position of the weapon and the animation of carrying the rifle, I would like it to be positioned in the middle of the screen instead of standing in the right corner and in the options we can set it to be closer or further away from the player's body so that the whole rifle can be seen and to insert a free aiming deadzone which would lead to the fact that when you go left you see the left side of the gun and when you go right you see the right side of the gun, similar to Bodycam
I was trying to make the mod in OHD and it looked quite nice and the gameplay itself is much more believable. I really enjoyed it. And like this, when I see this old way of weapon animation that is fixed in the lower right part of the screen, it disgusts me so much. Somehow the games have progressed graphically, but the animations have remained the same as they were 20 years ago
Interesting point, I’m curious if it’s just still so alpha that they haven’t dialed in the weapon position completely yet.
Pretty dope
Will it be available on ps5?
Seems like there's a lot of Dev's some single and some in teams who are capable of takingvthe tools and engines out there to create what would of been a jaw dropping looking game a handful of years ago. Still awaiting that team who can produce a relatively decent enemy A.i though, as that appears to be where the majority fall down big time. There's far to many multiplayer games that have nothing to sustain them long term and such a massive market out there for single player friendly stuff.
🥶🔥 🥶🔥 🥶🔥
with a team with that kind of resume, proper management is going to be key. to many passion projects have collapsed or delivered a barely functioning product because of piss poor management
Are you love this game ❤️❤️❤️
3:57 Reasonable
Oh wow another special forces milsim game
VIPER where is my But BUTT 🤣
@@kenooooooooobiii1125lmao no butt this time my man, I’ll make up for it next time 😂
@Viper1Zero our savior and arma goat🙏🤣
Yeah, and maybe you can create a video about the upcoming Arma 4 game which I heard will be released in 2027, you can search for more
I’m only hoping it runs faster than a powerpoint slideshow. 3DMAs models are too detailed and over complicated. I’ve only seen guys run their assets in Arma for artwork projects.
Yeah those assets were beautiful but TAXING, I didn’t realize till I made a full squad
Coming to console??
I think it’s going to be a PC title, my friend
if i understand correctly you'd need friends to play this
Maybe, or at least drop in with randoms
yeah not getting it, look at Gray Zone, unfortunately Karmakut has alot to prove
The recoil feels a bit weak
Another half made terminally early access game. Also sad that youtubers hype of these games just for it to be slop… ehmm im looking at you OHD
Seems cool but after waiting years for GroundBranch to become half-decent, my faith (or at least willingness to engage) with a startup project is pretty thin. They tend to be great concepts, but it’s 99% perspiration to 1% inspiration.
Hey look. Another one.
DJ Khaled that you playa?
Another multicam bros game with high tech gadgets, fidgeting around walls and jungles, very Special Ops, such pmc, wow...in all seriousness, the genre needs a new vibe, but this looks like any other game that sells The Milsim Experience.
Like good for him but arma3/reforger mods already do this for free.
IDK if it's not coming to PS5 I don't really care
Disappointing _yawn_
why every tactical shooter content creator wants to make their own game? Seriously best of luck for that, but I want to play it for myself not for my grandson. If possible, they all should make mods for ARMA 3 or any other existing game with their own CDLC. We will pay for that. Now I'm tired of this, "hey guys I am making new game and we will change the tactical shooter scene. Please support me."
first
@@floobieway Legend
Xbox plz
Another shooter without controller support EXCLUDING GAMERS WITH DISABILITIES DEPRIVING US FROM BEING ABLE TO JUST PLUG AND PLAY WITHOUT MUCH OR ANY HASSLE 😮😢SUCH A DAM FCKIN SHAME REALLY!!!.
I hope it supports voice-attack.
crazy clickbait title for a game that's only had 1 solid dev gameplay video
it looks SO BAD
Base on what? Keen to hear since its still pretty alpha
Another dry failed tactical shooter from a UA-camr, with another backpacking the game for content.
What a shit take. You must have never supported a friend in your life. Do better.
I mean hes right though. Karmakut has made a different game before and it didnt turn out well. This game just sounds like Squad, will probably turn into a clusterfuck community like squad