simple timeline preview can be done smoothly with much less... put effects and other tracks on it..... also you were using the 3090 in parts.. obviously that is going to be smooth. if you look at the igpu it is at 0%.. .so obviously it is completely fine..... talking about around 8:10 timeline.. possibly others... you should have possibly had the taskbar performance usage on top all the time, you would have seen it... but to be honest hard to make head or tails of this video as it is unclear if the gpu is used all the time or just with x265
I would love to see the benchmark more in terms of 3d development and modeling. Unreal and blender or Houdini running with after effects running in the same computer. I am not saying this is not valuable, but it is for UA-camrs, but there is bunch of sectors in the industry that really needs power houses.
@@infotainment9364 I had core 2 duo 2 core cpu but never edited on that , but then later i had 4 cores (core 2 quad ) cpu which I tried to edit, it was hard, it was lagging on higher resolution, editing at 1/4 😂 of 1080p, then later i had 6 cores (Ryzen 5 3500) cpu which was ok I used to edit 1080p easy, this cpu was performing good for gaming, then now I have 8 cores ryzen 7 5700g which I bought in case I will change my dgpu to any new graphics card, i can easily edit 4k videos and watch 8k youtube videos.
Thx, I like your praxis near tests so much. Can you show the timeline performance for the 13900k with the 4090 and the 3090? For creator it is interesting to know how much the 4090 increase the timeline perfomance.
Thanks for this video. I was researching to see if this processor could deliver good performance in video editing. I use both Premiere and DaVinci for editing. All the reviews only mention its excellent gaming capabilities. I usually work with proxy on 10bit h265 files. I work with an old computer, it's 10 years old. A 4th generation Intel i7, 4790. I want to upgrade: Ryzen 5 7600x + B650 MSI MAG Tomahawk Motherboard etc.
Considered overall cost of new platform (mobo, ram, CPU) is simply not worth to go for 7600x. If you want better value for money choosing stronger CPU is way to go. If you go for 7900x instead you get 2x more raw horse power for something about 30% higher overall cost of adapting the AM5 platform (I assume 32GB of ram config and average price of x670 mobo ).
Hey I have a quesiton. I am buying new PC set right now and I am wwondering if 7600X (or maybe even 7600) is good enough to freely program (in ide like Visual Studio code - big projects thats why I ask), or occasionally edit videos in adobe after effects (I dont know much about editing and I do it very rarely but i would probably edit in 1440p and like 120 fps). I also use virtual machines. Is it enough? thanks
Hi mate, thanks for great information on pc, I am looking to build ryzen cpu pc build, for 6k blackmagic video editing, can you please suggest? With hardware I should go with! I am in Australia 🇦🇺
@@hariskhan01 That's what I want to know. I've seen one person testing i9-13900K with a Noctua NH-D15 and it worked well. But, let's see what @TechNotice says.
so basically with me editing videos with output of 4k with adobe premier im good then to use ryzen 5 in my pc build? I only editing UA-cam and some music videos not like movies or should I go intel to prevent having to try to upgrade later?
@@IAmWadih I have the rx 7900xt 20 gb I’ve been setup for a couple month it’s great for gaming and editing + live streaming built it myself your the 1st person to answer any of my questions on UA-cam appreciate you
You don't have any movement in the frame which is skewing the results. Subject movement in the frame requires more resources and will choke that CPU even further than you are getting with your "still video" sequences. Thx for the info though.
My old prebuilt has a 5700x. It fairs well enough, same kinda deal where there’s no real dropped frames or anything in premiere for standard playback and higher codecs. When you start laying effects on it does chug a little though but as a whole it’s doable and isn’t too intrusive on your workload
Please I need someone’s help. I’m torn between buying the ryzen 5 7600x and the r7 7700x. My needs are gaming, productivity tasks, and editing on Capcut. Is the 8 core difference worth the extra money? It’s a 40-60 dollar difference from where I live.
Running a 3900X and 3070 with 32GB, and even when the resolution playback is reduced to 1/4 - 1/8 (1440p), I still can see many dropped frames (hundreds).
Glad to someone with 2 cores. I have i5 6th gen 2 core. 12gb ram, geforce 2gb. 6 year old laptop. Edit gopro 2.7k footage + yi4k footage + color grade and animations from AE using dynamic link. Its difficult but doable
I am in for the same choice... But, will the 7900 with double cores be like 80% faster in encoding video as opposed to the 7600, or just like a minor 20%? Do you know? How much do the core count have effect when encoding 4K video's.
simple timeline preview can be done smoothly with much less... put effects and other tracks on it..... also you were using the 3090 in parts.. obviously that is going to be smooth. if you look at the igpu it is at 0%.. .so obviously it is completely fine..... talking about around 8:10 timeline.. possibly others...
Welp, that answers the only question I had about Ryzen 7000. Maybe by the time I get round to upgrading AMD will have made their own alternative to QS, but in the meantime I guess I'm saving for an Intel!
AMD really needs to improve Media engine performance on everything, iGPUs , APUs and graphic cards. Their GPUs have always lacked behind in content creation and rendering performance.
This is not a cpu problem lol .Canon files codac are bad as hell. Hard to edit on any PC. This same cpu can handle 6k 60p 10 422 from other camera manufacturers if they choose a decent codac
What software do you use? I use wondershare and it works great with no lag and encodes much faster with gpu encoder but the output is too bad even when it's 4k 60 FPS given that the video to be edited also being at 4K 60 FPS has a very high quality.
Bro if you haven’t bought yet, the. I would recommend you go for 5500 cause its more latest the 2700 also it’s performance is better than 2700 about 15 to 20% Thanks…….
@@superbgamer3886hi pls help. I'm thinking to take ryzen 5 7600x. Can u pls suggest compatible GPU, motherboard etc for that. Mainly for video editing and is it good choice for video editing and does 6 core is enough. Thanks 🙏👍
Problem with zen4 cpus are that ipc only match Alderlake and its 12-13% only above zen3 even everyone expect 20-25% just like more cores and better pricing and AMD only offer high clocks and not so strong cores and lucky for them that sells of zen3 are still pretty fine but question for how long
AMD promised that as single thread specifically, not IPC. IPC being a relative metric matters when clocks are equal. Since they aren't the, absolute performance is the combination of IPC and clocks. Unless you'd plan to run a Zen4 chip at the same clocks as Zen 3 for some reason, I don't see how it's a problem.
@@blkspade23 ipc are bad clock for clock,some channel show it and its basically few% only above zen3!!seems they start slowing down too much so they use high clocks but that is not fine because high temperature are there even with pretty expensive coolers snd we see now that zen4 and raptor lake are simply too weak to push rtx 4090 more on 1440p just like on 1080 and basically you will need cpu from 2025 to.push gpu from 2022 on max
Yeah I agree - Alderlake IPC sucked, and high clocks don't do anything ... as Intel has always said, throwing more cores at the problem is the only way to improve a CPU.
Huge Thanks to CCL Online for supplying the Ryzen 7000 CPUs for testing! Check them out here: geni.us/4090inUK
simple timeline preview can be done smoothly with much less... put effects and other tracks on it..... also you were using the 3090 in parts.. obviously that is going to be smooth. if you look at the igpu it is at 0%.. .so obviously it is completely fine..... talking about around 8:10 timeline.. possibly others... you should have possibly had the taskbar performance usage on top all the time, you would have seen it... but to be honest hard to make head or tails of this video as it is unclear if the gpu is used all the time or just with x265
I would love to see the benchmark more in terms of 3d development and modeling. Unreal and blender or Houdini running with after effects running in the same computer. I am not saying this is not valuable, but it is for UA-camrs, but there is bunch of sectors in the industry that really needs power houses.
6-cores seriously bro... i edit my video in 2-cores😂😂
Your legend bro
@@goregejones7248 me to edit on 2 cores. Laptop cries sometimes
@@infotainment9364 I had core 2 duo 2 core cpu but never edited on that , but then later i had 4 cores (core 2 quad ) cpu which I tried to edit, it was hard, it was lagging on higher resolution, editing at 1/4 😂 of 1080p, then later i had 6 cores (Ryzen 5 3500) cpu which was ok I used to edit 1080p easy, this cpu was performing good for gaming, then now I have 8 cores ryzen 7 5700g which I bought in case I will change my dgpu to any new graphics card, i can easily edit 4k videos and watch 8k youtube videos.
same bro. I also edit video in i3 4 gen and 4 gb ram 😁
😮@@goregejones7248
These videos are the best, not just benchmarks like others do it but real playback. Now we need to see what the 13600k can do :)
For 1080p and 4k is very nice!!!
Thank you for this video my friend. Very important for me
Thx, I like your praxis near tests so much.
Can you show the timeline performance for the 13900k with the 4090 and the 3090? For creator it is interesting to know how much the 4090 increase the timeline perfomance.
Plz same test on i5 13600k
The i5 beats it and even the 7700x
I5 will be much better then this laggy footage
Coming!
@@najeebshah. but 7600x is 100 dollar cheaper how can you compare with 13th gen its better than 12th gen and even cheaper than i5 12600k in India
@@ig-whycantyoufindme amd just reduced the prices a bit because people weren't buying lol
Thanks for this video. I was researching to see if this processor could deliver good performance in video editing. I use both Premiere and DaVinci for editing. All the reviews only mention its excellent gaming capabilities.
I usually work with proxy on 10bit h265 files. I work with an old computer, it's 10 years old. A 4th generation Intel i7, 4790. I want to upgrade: Ryzen 5 7600x + B650 MSI MAG Tomahawk Motherboard etc.
Considered overall cost of new platform (mobo, ram, CPU) is simply not worth to go for 7600x. If you want better value for money choosing stronger CPU is way to go. If you go for 7900x instead you get 2x more raw horse power for something about 30% higher overall cost of adapting the AM5 platform (I assume 32GB of ram config and average price of x670 mobo ).
true but what if you want to upgrade in the future then it costs more.
I want good value for $180-$250
Sick video dude I’m a new subscriber and kloven your videos I’m trying to safe up for a pc but idk what to get
Does the 7600x play 4k hdr videos at 10 bit RGB 4 4 4 60hz? thanks!
It's way more than enough! Even new i3s can do that!
Hey I have a quesiton. I am buying new PC set right now and I am wwondering if 7600X (or maybe even 7600) is good enough to freely program (in ide like Visual Studio code - big projects thats why I ask), or occasionally edit videos in adobe after effects (I dont know much about editing and I do it very rarely but i would probably edit in 1440p and like 120 fps). I also use virtual machines. Is it enough? thanks
Same boat.
Very impressive.
it can do everything easily. main thing is the pricing is incorrect and the temperature
same performance with 12400
Hi mate, thanks for great information on pc, I am looking to build ryzen cpu pc build, for 6k blackmagic video editing, can you please suggest? With hardware I should go with! I am in Australia 🇦🇺
The real question is: How well can you do it with a i9-13900K on a Asus Z690 Creator with fan cooler only. : )
Interesting but horribly impractical XD.
Did the procie come with stock cooler? 🤣
@@bobyjhow Heheheheh. A NH-D15 Noctua. We have to keep the scenario believable. : )
@@hariskhan01 That's what I want to know. I've seen one person testing i9-13900K with a Noctua NH-D15 and it worked well. But, let's see what @TechNotice says.
I never saw the AMD iGPU go above 0%. It's not being utilized right? Am I missing something? This is a no go for me. I'll stick to my i5-12500.
that's right, it doesn't do anything :)
if that's your concern, better go to apple 🙃
Could you please do the same test with Ryzen 7900x? (Using After Effects also)
I'm also here for this... I don't have dedicated GPU... planning to buy 7900x for editing
Is playback smoother with the 7950x with 10bit & h265? Or would it be better to for the i9?
Does adding in an arc gpu for its quicksync encoders work well with ryzen 7000?
How Does it perform using Davinic Resolve (Studio) 18 ? Very Good Video by the Way.
So for my use (video edit in 2k 120 fps av1) it will be really great ?
Watching this closely on my work 6-core Macbook broadcast editing laptop...
And what is the problem in order to convert the video to an editing codec and already edit with it on AMD?
How much would the E cores in an Intel CPU help?? A little?? Not at all??
What is the minimal video card model you would use for editing videos with good quality ?
so basically with me editing videos with output of 4k with adobe premier im good then to use ryzen 5 in my pc build? I only editing UA-cam and some music videos not like movies or should I go intel to prevent having to try to upgrade later?
Its more than enough. Get a nice gpu.
@@IAmWadih I have the rx 7900xt 20 gb I’ve been setup for a couple month it’s great for gaming and editing + live streaming built it myself your the 1st person to answer any of my questions on UA-cam appreciate you
@@ace373dblock Thats a great gpu yeah. I dunno why people dont interact on here man. lol.
@@IAmWadih me either but I definitely appreciate you bro
@@ace373dblock Cheers bruv
why are you not using Samsung 990 Pro SSD?
Can you make a video showing the differences between in prores and h264 in playback speed, render speed etc?
Keeping in mind he had the playback resolution on full.
Yep
You don't have any movement in the frame which is skewing the results. Subject movement in the frame requires more resources and will choke that CPU even further than you are getting with your "still video" sequences. Thx for the info though.
is your windows 11 works without any issues?
How does the old Ryzen 5700X fares? I'm thinking of getting the 7500F or the old 5700X.
My old prebuilt has a 5700x. It fairs well enough, same kinda deal where there’s no real dropped frames or anything in premiere for standard playback and higher codecs. When you start laying effects on it does chug a little though but as a whole it’s doable and isn’t too intrusive on your workload
@NaanosVEVO nothing too crazy for the edits. Just 4K, some colour grading, texts, some audio...and that's it. It should be more than enough right?
@@Rogue_throttle that should be absolutely fine, I think you’re good
Another vid just with the igpu? hehe
i don't get it. why can't amd play that h264 video in adobe ? because it runs in Vlcplayer what is the difference ?
Please I need someone’s help.
I’m torn between buying the ryzen 5 7600x and the r7 7700x. My needs are gaming, productivity tasks, and editing on Capcut. Is the 8 core difference worth the extra money? It’s a 40-60 dollar difference from where I live.
7700x runs really got and consume a lot of power
thanks man
The igpu wasn't used at all im gonna get the 7500f
Can you use this setup for editing 4k videos from osmo action 3? I dont know what codec it uses
Running a 3900X and 3070 with 32GB, and even when the resolution playback is reduced to 1/4 - 1/8 (1440p), I still can see many dropped frames (hundreds).
Thats what i was saying.
So amd trash ?
@@jacklack1818 No, it may just be better optimised for Intel or more recent Zen releases, e.g. 5000/7000 series.
@@Yellowswift3 I have a ryzen 2600 that all these UA-camrs hyped up and it’s trash I just edit on my iPhone
@@jacklack1818 Aside from editing, how do you find it for general desktop usage and gaming?
I edit my videos on intel i5 4th gen CPU which has 2 cores and 4 threads 🥲
Glad to someone with 2 cores. I have i5 6th gen 2 core. 12gb ram, geforce 2gb. 6 year old laptop. Edit gopro 2.7k footage + yi4k footage + color grade and animations from AE using dynamic link. Its difficult but doable
Cool
I edited videos on one single core on adobe premiere back in the days of pentium 4
Also me editing 4k in my i3 9th with 4 cores lol
I also edit 4k and 1080p on my 4th generation i7 with 4 cores (usually proxy) 😂
The iGPU did absolutely nothing? Are you sure it was working correctly?
Yep
it wasnt working correctly , look at other benchmarks
non video guy here... what on earth is 12k video used for?
so you can crop to 8k :)
in real life? for nothing 😂
Got a 7900, but returned immediately when it arrived.
Got a 7600 instead, couldn't justify 80% more cost for occasional hobbyist editing.
I am in for the same choice... But, will the 7900 with double cores be like 80% faster in encoding video as opposed to the 7600, or just like a minor 20%? Do you know? How much do the core count have effect when encoding 4K video's.
simple timeline preview can be done smoothly with much less... put effects and other tracks on it..... also you were using the 3090 in parts.. obviously that is going to be smooth. if you look at the igpu it is at 0%.. .so obviously it is completely fine..... talking about around 8:10 timeline.. possibly others...
The 3090 only accelerates Lumetricolour effect and certain codecs, but that's the same decoder as on the rtx 3050 (or any 30 series GPUs.
Welp, that answers the only question I had about Ryzen 7000. Maybe by the time I get round to upgrading AMD will have made their own alternative to QS, but in the meantime I guess I'm saving for an Intel!
AMD really needs to improve Media engine performance on everything, iGPUs , APUs and graphic cards. Their GPUs have always lacked behind in content creation and rendering performance.
This is not a cpu problem lol .Canon files codac are bad as hell. Hard to edit on any PC. This same cpu can handle 6k 60p 10 422 from other camera manufacturers if they choose a decent codac
is ryzen 5 7600x is better than ryzen 7 5700x? can anyone reply me quick ASAP, coz i wanna build a PC.
Choose the 5 7600 for future proofing
@@hdidjejxjdidcc thanks bro, my pc turns out the beast.
what did you end up getting?
Please include a multicamera playback and scrubbing test in your tests as well 🙏
That's the live playback score test on pugetbench and will be included on my 7600x review
😍😍😍😍😍😍 waiting i5 1300k
I edit 4K video just fine on a Ryzen 5 2600x. 😅
What software do you use? I use wondershare and it works great with no lag and encodes much faster with gpu encoder but the output is too bad even when it's 4k 60 FPS given that the video to be edited also being at 4K 60 FPS has a very high quality.
I am hesitating between ryzen 5 5500 and ryzen 7 2700 for premiere pro, can anyone recomend what to do?
Bro if you haven’t bought yet, the. I would recommend you go for 5500 cause its more latest the 2700 also it’s performance is better than 2700 about 15 to 20%
Thanks…….
@@superbgamer3886 thanks!
@@superbgamer3886hi pls help. I'm thinking to take ryzen 5 7600x. Can u pls suggest compatible GPU, motherboard etc for that. Mainly for video editing and is it good choice for video editing and does 6 core is enough. Thanks 🙏👍
@@PradeepKumar-tq4evTake the B650e X AX and the Radeon 7700XT for a great budget value gpu or 4070
Problem with zen4 cpus are that ipc only match Alderlake and its 12-13% only above zen3 even everyone expect 20-25% just like more cores and better pricing and AMD only offer high clocks and not so strong cores and lucky for them that sells of zen3 are still pretty fine but question for how long
AMD promised that as single thread specifically, not IPC. IPC being a relative metric matters when clocks are equal. Since they aren't the, absolute performance is the combination of IPC and clocks. Unless you'd plan to run a Zen4 chip at the same clocks as Zen 3 for some reason, I don't see how it's a problem.
@@blkspade23 ipc are bad clock for clock,some channel show it and its basically few% only above zen3!!seems they start slowing down too much so they use high clocks but that is not fine because high temperature are there even with pretty expensive coolers snd we see now that zen4 and raptor lake are simply too weak to push rtx 4090 more on 1440p just like on 1080 and basically you will need cpu from 2025 to.push gpu from 2022 on max
Yeah I agree - Alderlake IPC sucked, and high clocks don't do anything ... as Intel has always said, throwing more cores at the problem is the only way to improve a CPU.
@@WaspMedia3D so why Alder Lake wiped the floor with AMD's best AM4 lineup the Ryzen 5000 series? How can that translated to being bad IPC?
@@baoquoc3710 Right over your head.
was hoping youd compare the RTX vs the integrated Radeon for shits and giggles.
Remember they days of editing on one core lol
Intel cpus are much better for premiere workload
I still use a 7700k, I don't understand this video
Have you enabled the AMD APU?
Finally Ryzen price cuts on the UK shores and Europe.
3:50 5:21 12:20
Nice, now test the 16 core.
I think the TUF might be pronounced “tough” not “toof”
#northernengland :)
@@theTechNotice wye aye!
Which one is better ryzen 7600x or i5 12400 ?
i5 for this kind of work
@@nixulescu9399 and why? Than 12 600K is 100% better how 7600x?
bro, im editing on g3220
Same test 13600k first
YES YOU CAN WHY NOT ?
Impressive performance by Ryzen..... somehow better some Dan Intel cpu
3rd
The 7600x is incredibly dead and bad value here vs 12600k and 13600k
I would rather prefer i5 13600k