Many get a chopped experience on the timeline when they add some fusion titles and video transmission to the video on DR. I advise you to add some of these effects when you do this kind of test in addition of color grading. Thank you for your videos! They are awsome 😊👍
i no enjoi buut he try four make improve. very difficulty four me understandiing his say but every dayys he making working four more color and more auudio and more visuality four audience make enjoi buut more improve if he show more india
Time to switch resolve then?😬. Btw, would've loved to see some Fusion tests, Resolve comes with fusion templates, both the edit and Fusion page. The title presets and also the templates under particles in Fusion are pretty heavy to run.
I'd like to see the Task Manager all the time. If you capture your screen in a bit higher resolution you'd fit two windows in it. I guess it was 1080p. 1440p could be enough.
I think when most of us edit, we do not use the mouse. We scrub using the keyboard 1× 2x or 3x scrub keyboard shortcuts. Also, we need to scrub backward, which is where things fall apart. This would be a much more real world test for editors, versus skipping around the timeline with the mouse.
I don't use the JKL keys, I do scrub, but scrubbing performance isn't as much of a problem for me as live playback. I want my things to play full speed. I will say, for me, I know what codecs don't work well with AMD, and I avoid them. I shoot either 420 10-bit, or RAW/ProRes and it's seamless
Please please please do this test on the AMD (and Intel GPUs). Or maybe a better question is, when may we expect the video (if it's coming)? Thanks for the hard work on these.
Hi bud, would love to see how 7600x holds up in 2025 with the RTX 40 series GPUs as they have a dedicated AV1 hardware decoder, enabling smoother playback of AV1-encoded content. If you plan to make video like that please choose 4070 series card as they only have single encoder, as the 4080 and 4090 have dual encoders(Also, 7600x and 4070 series makes a better pair due to budget). Loved this Video❤.
Did you have the Adrenalin drivers installed for the RDNA2 graphics on the iGPU ? IIRC, you do have to seperatly install the graphics drivers also for the RDNA2 iGPU on the CPU.
For the RED clips, the GPU is doing nearly all the work. Can't really attribute that to the CPU. Also, R3D compression ratio matters a lot and I don't think you mentioned it on any clips. Also, it would've been worth disabling the Nvidia acceleration in the settings so to test if the AMD iGPU can do anything at all. I recently replaced my 7950x with a 13900k because the iGPU was so borked on the AMD chip in both Premiere Pro and Resolve.
I agree. I don't know why he didn't just disable the 3090 completely if he wanted to test the AMD iGPU itself. So would you recommend intel CPU over AMD for video editing? Or would AMD with a good GPU still be good?
@@squatch545 If you primarily edit h264 or h265 codecs then Intel without hesitation. If you edit REDCODE then an Nvidia GPU will be super helpful since it can debayer and decompress RED footage.
Nice video, just curious if the AMD 7700X is much better? Seems it might be better bang for the buck over the 7600X, will those 2 extra cores make that much of difference? Thanks, keep up the great work.
Big Gordon Ramsey fan, loving the reference. I think you should cut in 3 seconds of him saying ITS RAWWWW every time a product has some doubtful "feature" like upgrades that take away a feature. Or the old classic "Ju..ju...j...ju...jus... JUST SMELL THAT!" ;)
Would it be possible to do a comparison video for people who are still on the X570 platform? I'm thinking of staying with AMD 5000 series and I would love to see how the 5950x stacks up against the 7950x on the like h.265 422 10-bit codecs.
What i do is I use my PC for AAA gaming and M1 MacBook air base model for video editing (davinci resolve travel videos at either 4k 30 or 4k 60 using my Go pro hero 9 and an Iphone 12 pro as my mains cameras) it runs pretty smooth. Bought the macbook used for 620 dollars last year. Note: i do use Lumafusion on my Ipad pro from 2018 and that runs buttery smooth at 4k 30 and 60fps.
I'm going AMD Zen 4 Pheonix/Dragon Range (with RTX 40 series) because I'm eyeing a new gaming laptop this year. Mainly due to performance + battery life. Intel is great for performance but battery life for casual tasks was really bad with alderlake and Intel isn't making any claims with Raptorlake either. However AMD's RDNA architecture is @$$ for GPU compute. Don't have much hope on getting those RDNA2 iGPU CUs to aid encode/decode in Resolve/Premiere.
Hi, do you think I can have the same results with RTX 3060 12GB and video 4k 30fps in 360°. I've just bought a Insta360 rs 1 inch 360 edition and I have 3k 50 fps, 4k 30 fps and 6k 30fps all of them in 360°. Thanks
The real test is to record a narative track in fairlight while playing a timelapse of a 4k video at 1000% If the CPU bottlenecks, you get audio clipping.
tengo la i7 12700k con una tarjeta 2060; davinci resolve no tiene la opción de seleccionar la tarjeta integrada, quiere decir que no trabaja con la UHD GRAPHIC 770. premier pro si trabaja con ambas tarjetas graficas... alguna solución para davinci resolve?
How is it possible that your performance test with Ryzen 5600x + RTX 3070 is smoother and faster than this setup ? Particulary with Raw files, huge difference, the Ryzen 5600x doesn't have any problem. I don't understand how it is possible.
simple math: if you're editing RAW - Red, Arri, BMD etc... get the AMD cpu if you're editing compressed codec mainly h264/h265, get Intel. and, these math only applies for daily professional editors who works as professional editor in the industry (TVs, Cinemas, Commercials etc) if you're a just an enthusiast, a youtuber who do their own editing, not dealing with professional or high-end clients where every single seconds are money & not affecting either your or the client's work & cost, you can go either one.
The most used software for creators is Filmora. Why? Easiest to use for new creators. PLEASE do hardware testings so we can know what is better to buy.
7600x are not for video editing but it beats 12600k and in gaming its 3-5% above 13600k on average on 25-30+ tested games as in Hardware unboxed channel
Lots of my friends have using only AMD processors for video editing and 3d works for several years. I bought at their recommendations. It's very fast at present. I don't know about future what to happen.
@@phillysupra Won't fix the fact that Quicksync acceleration on the Intel iGPU is irreplaceable if you use codecs it supports. The AMD iGPU is basically nonfunctional at this point. I recently replaced my 7950x with a 13900k because of editing performance issues on the Zen4 chip.
@@cliph6068 as an editor myself, that was a total waste of money as you've had to completely change platforms. I've been editing since the late 90's and there have always been work arounds outisde of replacing every component. My first thoughts of were the Mac g5 days
@@phillysupra It's absolutely not a waste of money if you regularly use codecs that benefit from the hardware acceleration. Not being able to edit fluidly is awful and waiting hours to transcode to an intermediate codec is not a great option.
His channel is about creative professional computer hardware. No one relying on a computer to make money is going to do such exotic things that void warranties for the sake of a lower operating temp.
@@blkspade23 he doesn`t need to, Derbauer already did it, he just need to look...Also Derbauer proved that intel made the last case too thin and it`s bending in the socket, now it`s selling plates for antibending, AMD did the case too thick to be compatibile with the old coolers, and now the termals are off...for a delided intel he gains 5 degrees, for an AMD 23 deg
I bet resolve free would wreck this CPU as it's only the studio that uses the GPU. Before you all go out and start looking for a cheap CPU with a free piece of software.
@@blkspade23 as far as I'm aware it doesn't support GPU acceleration in free. At least that was what it done in 17! Obviously it will use a GPU, just not to it's full advantage.
@@ifell3 I was wondering why he has more options to check under Decode Options. I have the free version and I don't have these settings. I guess you have to own the Studio version of DR.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Make another video editing in da Vinci with i5 13600k!
Many get a chopped experience on the timeline when they add some fusion titles and video transmission to the video on DR.
I advise you to add some of these effects when you do this kind of test in addition of color grading.
Thank you for your videos! They are awsome 😊👍
i no enjoi buut he try four make improve. very difficulty four me understandiing his say but every dayys he making working four more color and more auudio and more visuality four audience make enjoi buut more improve if he show more india
animation in Fusion is done through the video card. And here they check the processor for decoding, because the processor mostly does it.
I don't understand how playback is a test of the AMD CPU when the GPU accelerated decoding is enabled on the NVIDIA GPU
exactly. All the 6k and 8k footages were decoded by the 3090. AMD's cpus are not that great when it comes to video decoding
Time to switch resolve then?😬. Btw, would've loved to see some Fusion tests, Resolve comes with fusion templates, both the edit and Fusion page. The title presets and also the templates under particles in Fusion are pretty heavy to run.
It's been time to switch. I've switched and don't regret it.
I'd like to see the Task Manager all the time. If you capture your screen in a bit higher resolution you'd fit two windows in it. I guess it was 1080p. 1440p could be enough.
And HWinfo64
I think when most of us edit, we do not use the mouse. We scrub using the keyboard 1× 2x or 3x scrub keyboard shortcuts. Also, we need to scrub backward, which is where things fall apart. This would be a much more real world test for editors, versus skipping around the timeline with the mouse.
I don't use the JKL keys, I do scrub, but scrubbing performance isn't as much of a problem for me as live playback. I want my things to play full speed.
I will say, for me, I know what codecs don't work well with AMD, and I avoid them. I shoot either 420 10-bit, or RAW/ProRes and it's seamless
Please please please do this test on the AMD (and Intel GPUs).
Or maybe a better question is, when may we expect the video (if it's coming)?
Thanks for the hard work on these.
Thanks for this kind of review. Doesn't really matter on the cpu side of things...gonna get a gpu with huge vram next.
Hi bud, would love to see how 7600x holds up in 2025 with the RTX 40 series GPUs as they have a dedicated AV1 hardware decoder, enabling smoother playback of AV1-encoded content. If you plan to make video like that please choose 4070 series card as they only have single encoder, as the 4080 and 4090 have dual encoders(Also, 7600x and 4070 series makes a better pair due to budget).
Loved this Video❤.
Did you have the Adrenalin drivers installed for the RDNA2 graphics on the iGPU ? IIRC, you do have to seperatly install the graphics drivers also for the RDNA2 iGPU on the CPU.
Did you installed and tried?
For the RED clips, the GPU is doing nearly all the work. Can't really attribute that to the CPU. Also, R3D compression ratio matters a lot and I don't think you mentioned it on any clips. Also, it would've been worth disabling the Nvidia acceleration in the settings so to test if the AMD iGPU can do anything at all. I recently replaced my 7950x with a 13900k because the iGPU was so borked on the AMD chip in both Premiere Pro and Resolve.
Wow. I have 12600k
I agree. I don't know why he didn't just disable the 3090 completely if he wanted to test the AMD iGPU itself.
So would you recommend intel CPU over AMD for video editing? Or would AMD with a good GPU still be good?
@@squatch545 If you primarily edit h264 or h265 codecs then Intel without hesitation. If you edit REDCODE then an Nvidia GPU will be super helpful since it can debayer and decompress RED footage.
@@cliph6068 Thanks. What about AVC and AV1 ?
Good points man.
Nice video, just curious if the AMD 7700X is much better? Seems it might be better bang for the buck over the 7600X, will those 2 extra cores make that much of difference? Thanks, keep up the great work.
I have the same question rn did u find the answer?
there is also decode_2 in the taskmanager for the GPU
I was wondering, if you force AMD decoding
cuz I have no 3090 ;)
Big Gordon Ramsey fan, loving the reference. I think you should cut in 3 seconds of him saying ITS RAWWWW every time a product has some doubtful "feature" like upgrades that take away a feature.
Or the old classic "Ju..ju...j...ju...jus... JUST SMELL THAT!" ;)
Would it be possible to do a comparison video for people who are still on the X570 platform? I'm thinking of staying with AMD 5000 series and I would love to see how the 5950x stacks up against the 7950x on the like h.265 422 10-bit codecs.
7600X vs 13600k in DaVinci?
Can you test only the iGPU?
What i do is I use my PC for AAA gaming and M1 MacBook air base model for video editing (davinci resolve travel videos at either 4k 30 or 4k 60 using my Go pro hero 9 and an Iphone 12 pro as my mains cameras) it runs pretty smooth. Bought the macbook used for 620 dollars last year.
Note: i do use Lumafusion on my Ipad pro from 2018 and that runs buttery smooth at 4k 30 and 60fps.
So for 1080p and for 2k editing is it good ??? And for streaming?
what the point to test cpu if there is nvidia card in it which does all the job
Certain you go into the cog in the bottom right, timeline playback FPS.
I'm going AMD Zen 4 Pheonix/Dragon Range (with RTX 40 series) because I'm eyeing a new gaming laptop this year. Mainly due to performance + battery life. Intel is great for performance but battery life for casual tasks was really bad with alderlake and Intel isn't making any claims with Raptorlake either.
However AMD's RDNA architecture is @$$ for GPU compute. Don't have much hope on getting those RDNA2 iGPU CUs to aid encode/decode in Resolve/Premiere.
Hlo ryzen 5 7600 x is good or bad for 3d rendering maya motion builder ai etc.?
You keep using the cardea C$$) SSD do they even still make it as it is impossible to get, at least at a normal price isaw it selling for like £288.00
Hi, do you think I can have the same results with RTX 3060 12GB and video 4k 30fps in 360°. I've just bought a Insta360 rs 1 inch 360 edition and I have 3k 50 fps, 4k 30 fps and 6k 30fps all of them in 360°. Thanks
Hi, can you make a video on multiple GPUs being used -eg. Say 3 rtx 4090 card how will the performance be?
The real test is to record a narative track in fairlight while playing a timelapse of a 4k video at 1000%
If the CPU bottlenecks, you get audio clipping.
tengo la i7 12700k con una tarjeta 2060; davinci resolve no tiene la opción de seleccionar la tarjeta integrada, quiere decir que no trabaja con la UHD GRAPHIC 770.
premier pro si trabaja con ambas tarjetas graficas... alguna solución para davinci resolve?
¿Versión Studio?
How is it possible that your performance test with Ryzen 5600x + RTX 3070 is smoother and faster than this setup ? Particulary with Raw files, huge difference, the Ryzen 5600x doesn't have any problem. I don't understand how it is possible.
I dont see the iGPU on my task manager. should i be enabling it for it to work?
Yes, if you don't see it in TM then it's disabled in bios or you don't have correct drivers:)
Why no video on intel arc GPU..?
I would like to see the performance of Intel 12600k or 13600k plus Intel arc
Plz do same with i5 12400 or just reply
simple math:
if you're editing RAW - Red, Arri, BMD etc... get the AMD cpu
if you're editing compressed codec mainly h264/h265, get Intel.
and, these math only applies for daily professional editors who works as professional editor in the industry (TVs, Cinemas, Commercials etc)
if you're a just an enthusiast, a youtuber who do their own editing, not dealing with professional or high-end clients where every single seconds are money & not affecting either your or the client's work & cost, you can go either one.
What about AV1?
Please review photoshop on AMD 7000 and 7000x processor onboard graphics
Just downloaded resolve 18 not tried it yet
Got that "Kevin Samuels" music in the background!! 🎹🎸🎵
The most used software for creators is Filmora. Why? Easiest to use for new creators. PLEASE do hardware testings so we can know what is better to buy.
Did you see what they did to their "lifetime" licencees?
@VD1 Capcut PC is the way to go!
Make video with .mts HD format both premiere and resolve, .mts HD is hard to scrumble play, sorry for vad English
Please Do R9 7900X
7600x are not for video editing but it beats 12600k and in gaming its 3-5% above 13600k on average on 25-30+ tested games as in Hardware unboxed channel
It's all-rounder cpu. You can edit video very smoothly.
@@RakeshShankarBharti smaller videos,bigger ones or 4k ones it will take longer
Any cpu in this budget range will take longer time on long heavy video, but it's editable.
@@RakeshShankarBharti except maybe 13600kf/13500
Lots of my friends have using only AMD processors for video editing and 3d works for several years. I bought at their recommendations. It's very fast at present. I don't know about future what to happen.
Yes, while this option does not reach me, the permissions are too large, but if intel takes over everything, then you can see who is in charge here
Please do a test on a Ryzen 7000 without a dGPU.
PLEASE DO THIS ON ADOBE PREMERE +AMD 16CORE CPU+AMD GPU
I’m glad I went with 13700k
x3d in a few weeks though
@@phillysupra Won't fix the fact that Quicksync acceleration on the Intel iGPU is irreplaceable if you use codecs it supports. The AMD iGPU is basically nonfunctional at this point. I recently replaced my 7950x with a 13900k because of editing performance issues on the Zen4 chip.
@@cliph6068 as an editor myself, that was a total waste of money as you've had to completely change platforms. I've been editing since the late 90's and there have always been work arounds outisde of replacing every component. My first thoughts of were the Mac g5 days
@@phillysupra It's absolutely not a waste of money if you regularly use codecs that benefit from the hardware acceleration. Not being able to edit fluidly is awful and waiting hours to transcode to an intermediate codec is not a great option.
@@cliph6068 I remember what waiting hours was like.... Mini dv playback importing.
You can edit 8k video on this cpu.
nope, it runs hot because of the huge copper plate , do a deliding and be surprised of the -20 degrees you get on the chip
His channel is about creative professional computer hardware. No one relying on a computer to make money is going to do such exotic things that void warranties for the sake of a lower operating temp.
@@blkspade23 he doesn`t need to, Derbauer already did it, he just need to look...Also Derbauer proved that intel made the last case too thin and it`s bending in the socket, now it`s selling plates for antibending, AMD did the case too thick to be compatibile with the old coolers, and now the termals are off...for a delided intel he gains 5 degrees, for an AMD 23 deg
7:06
🤩
I bet resolve free would wreck this CPU as it's only the studio that uses the GPU. Before you all go out and start looking for a cheap CPU with a free piece of software.
Free Resolve still uses the GPU, but is limited to 1.
@@blkspade23 as far as I'm aware it doesn't support GPU acceleration in free. At least that was what it done in 17! Obviously it will use a GPU, just not to it's full advantage.
@@ifell3 I was wondering why he has more options to check under Decode Options. I have the free version and I don't have these settings. I guess you have to own the Studio version of DR.
Import 2hr clip then check it
It's not the length of the clip that matters, but the codec the clip has :)
I probably won't use 8k in my life, so no problem 😂