Imagine TCJ, at the material time that the PAP was aware of the Xaffair, can chaired the committee of privileges in the RK case against honorable Pritam Singh? How to Trust the PAP?
Can you help me to reconcile with the 2 differences; Referring to The Minutes of Evidence (MOE) in the COP findings, MOE V2, Line 13952: RK said they discussed her "well-being" and she shared a very deeply "personal experience", And the discussion that followed was that we would not pursue the matter further and like in my message, Mr Singh used the words “take it to the grave”. In the COP Main Report; Page 8 Line 27(2) Mr Singh told her, in the presence of Ms Lim and Mr Faisal, that she should take the Untruth “to the grave”. I thought RK's exact Words were "take it to the grave" and not "take the Untruth to the grave" and the context was on her "Well-Being" and a very deeply "personal experience".? Question: How come the difference between what was said by RK and the report? and why is this about?
The more they try to take every opportunity to tarnish the image, the more Popular they become and I predict will win more support regardless of the obvious outcome.
Very simple for Raeesah Khan and the 2 sidekicks to “take one for the team” but they wanted to be clever, inevitably doing WP in. Aiyah such loyal ex-WP cadres ❤❤
She was sworn-in and took the Oath as Member of Parliament and She owe it upon herself to come clean to make the correction and tell the truth in Parliament. She should thank PS for prompting her to do so.
Recent scandals within Singapore’s political landscape underline the need for equal accountability across parties - urging the question: should a Committee of Privileges probe into the Tan Chuan-Jin scandal as rigorously as it did the Workers’ Party’s Raeesah Khan case?
Referring to CNA News on the 25 Oct 2024 11:48AM; Quote; "Ms Loh says Mr Nathan suggested at this meeting that Ms Khan continue the lie. She later agrees that Singh had responded by saying: “Don't even suggest covering this up with another lie.”"
Trump 4 criminal Charges and still returns as the 47th president. Goes to show that educated citizens have got eyes to see and fixing Political Opponents doesn't work. PS could very well be the next Prime Minister of Singapore, who knows. I'll vote for him.
One of the hallmarks of an accomplished cross examiner, unlike a medical examiner, is that, when push comes to shove, he or she is not afraid to step on anybody's toes. Nowhere is this more demonstrably true than in the gripping performance we have witnessed today.
The stark difference in the management of these two scandals, one fresh and one two years old, presents a notable contrast and prompts the question of whether the same standards of accountability and transparency were applied to both situations, or if we are witnessing a double standard.
As we compare a case from the past with one in the present, it’s vital that we ensure the same rules apply to all, regardless of when the incident occurred or which party was involved.
It's like a marathon of the brains between PS and Ang to see who will falter first. Fortunately PS is also a lawyer himself capable of enormous stress and multitasking ability. I think PS will excel well but the outcome is concretely obvious and will still reinforce LHY oversea complaints and claims, regardless. No worries PS, many Singaporeans are ready to have your back.
Small issue la , her lie does not cause local breed whole-life hard-earned stressed n sweat c p f money any loses whereas government using our c p f money don't know how much are lose that might have affected our Singaporean c p f money keep increasing the minimum sum that not able to return sooner.
The handling of these two cases presents a glaring disparity. The WP leaders were rigorously scrutinized and interrogated for their two-month delay in managing Raeesah Khan’s issue.
Should there not be a similar inquiry into the PAP’s handling of Tan Chuan-Jin’s case, to clarify who knew about the affair,
Yes... Why are they so quiet about TCJ?
The issue becomes even more significant considering that Tan Chuan-Jin was the Speaker of Parliament, a position wielding considerable authority.
Imagine TCJ, at the material time that the PAP was aware of the Xaffair, can chaired the committee of privileges in the RK case against honorable Pritam Singh?
How to Trust the PAP?
Can you help me to reconcile with the 2 differences;
Referring to The Minutes of Evidence (MOE) in the COP findings, MOE V2, Line 13952: RK said they discussed her "well-being" and she shared a very deeply "personal experience", And the discussion that followed was that we would not pursue the matter further and like in my message, Mr Singh used the words “take it to the grave”.
In the COP Main Report; Page 8 Line 27(2) Mr Singh told her, in the presence of Ms Lim and Mr Faisal, that she should take the Untruth “to the grave”.
I thought RK's exact Words were "take it to the grave" and not "take the Untruth to the grave" and the context was on her "Well-Being" and a very deeply "personal experience".?
Question: How come the difference between what was said by RK and the report? and why is this about?
The more they try to take every opportunity to tarnish the image, the more Popular they become and I predict will win more support regardless of the obvious outcome.
So the gov raised the GST to pay for this "he said, she said" case which does not have a single concrete evidence?
Very simple for Raeesah Khan and the 2 sidekicks to “take one for the team” but they wanted to be clever, inevitably doing WP in. Aiyah such loyal ex-WP cadres ❤❤
@CalvinK-the_old_fogey So the PAP government listens to these 3 ex-WP members and decides to waste tax payer's dollars. Got it 👍
After all, the same standards should be applied, regardless of political affiliation.
She was sworn-in and took the Oath as Member of Parliament and She owe it upon herself to come clean to make the correction and tell the truth in Parliament. She should thank PS for prompting her to do so.
Stop all these nonsense …
We citizen know how to judge ourselves and we know how to vote ourselves …
Wake up sinkies…after Pritam, next will be u
Recent scandals within Singapore’s political landscape underline the need for equal accountability across parties - urging the question: should a Committee of Privileges probe into the Tan Chuan-Jin scandal as rigorously as it did the Workers’ Party’s Raeesah Khan case?
Referring to CNA News on the 25 Oct 2024 11:48AM;
Quote;
"Ms Loh says Mr Nathan suggested at this meeting that Ms Khan continue the lie.
She later agrees that Singh had responded by saying: “Don't even suggest
covering this up with another lie.”"
Trump 4 criminal Charges and still returns as the 47th president. Goes to show that educated citizens have got eyes to see and fixing Political Opponents doesn't work.
PS could very well be the next Prime Minister of Singapore, who knows.
I'll vote for him.
One of the hallmarks of an accomplished cross examiner, unlike a medical examiner, is that, when push comes to shove, he or she is not afraid to step on anybody's toes. Nowhere is this more demonstrably true than in the gripping performance we have witnessed today.
The stark difference in the management of these two scandals, one fresh and one two years old, presents a notable contrast and prompts the question of whether the same standards of accountability and transparency were applied to both situations, or if we are witnessing a double standard.
As we compare a case from the past with one in the present, it’s vital that we ensure the same rules apply to all, regardless of when the incident occurred or which party was involved.
Lies and more lies. The WP leader has made himself a laughing stock for the world to enjoy. S'poreans simply can't trust anyone in WP. Incorrigible!😂😂
when PM Lee chose to lie and whether there was a deliberate attempt to cover up the affair to the Parliament and general public?
I don't get it. How and Where are the relevancies of all these "incriminating suggestions" to his 2 Charges?
All thanks to the 3 ex-WP cadre members Huat Ah!
This is one of the best opposition , don't distroy them like late PM say we need some opposition in palimant 😅😊😊😊😊😊
RK's email to thank PS for guiding her without judgement could be a bait. No details. Very vague.
It's like a marathon of the brains between PS and Ang to see who will falter first. Fortunately PS is also a lawyer himself capable of enormous stress and multitasking ability. I think PS will excel well but the outcome is concretely obvious and will still reinforce LHY oversea complaints and claims, regardless.
No worries PS, many Singaporeans are ready to have your back.
Small issue la , her lie does not cause local breed whole-life hard-earned stressed n sweat c p f money any loses whereas government using our c p f money don't know how much are lose that might have affected our Singaporean c p f money keep increasing the minimum sum that not able to return sooner.
The handling of these two cases presents a glaring disparity. The WP leaders were rigorously scrutinized and interrogated for their two-month delay in managing Raeesah Khan’s issue.
Both these scandals resulted in the resignation of the MPs involved, but the discrepancy in handling raises significant questions.
Suppose the COP investigation was necessary for WP leaders following Khan’s resignation.
He will reject cause it is a falsehood against Pritiam Singh
"If Aljunied decides to go that way, well Aljunied has five years to live and repent."
Lee Kuan Yew
2011
*Tell me lies Tell me sweet little lies ..... Tell me Tell me Lieeeeeees*
hubba bubba
But.....But..... But.... Prosecutor Believes SERIAL LIAR Raeesah
DAMN JOKE
Singapore don't need this liar