This tell us that GRC is a joke to bring wrong person into parliament. Who implement this system? How many useless MPs alteady inside sitting and doing nothing but collecting our hard earn money?😊
I don't believed Pritam Singh lied, he don't need to fall into Raeesah's lie and now I wonder why she had cooked up a story that is a lie, is there an intention to topple him, if so why and what or who is the source ? Mr Pritam Singh, you have my support and vote.
I have a feeling that that RK sent a msg to PS during the hearing was a bait. Fortunately, PS was focused on something else more important and did not respond to her msg right away at the time.
All these fiascos could have been avoided if only he had answered the call n INSTRUCTED her to come clean. In fact it shouldn’t even be at that “ crucial” call. The minute he knew she lied, as a leader, knowing PAP will pursue to end of the earth, he ought to have INSTRUCTED her to come clean by a certain date. He knew the 2 subsequent parliament sitting dates. That should be the dateline!
@@HulakariHulakari-ju9yb There is no right or wrong, just the COP's objection to the WP's manner of dealing with the issue. Still remember LHL's revelation of fixing the opposition in 2006.
@@HulakariHulakari-ju9ybYour explanation shd also apply to LHL when he first learned about Tan Chuan Jin's extramarital affairs. So obvious PAP's all out to fix Oppo.
@@ewmurphy PS is the one on trial not anyone else. Even if u want to draw a parallel with LHL, don’t forget PS is the underdog n opposition trying to displace the giant. U don’t compare each other’s weaknesses. U must beat the champion to be the new champion.
@ right or wrong, guilty or innocent, that’s for the judge to decide. I m referring to LEADERSHIP. There’s such a thing as good or poor leadership. Only those who understand what good leadership entails will know the difference.
Can you help answer this question; Referring to The Minutes of Evidence (MOE) in the COP findings, MOE V2, Line 13952: RK said they discussed her "well-being" and she shared a very deeply "personal experience", And the discussion that followed was that we would not pursue the matter further and like in my message, Mr. Singh used the words “take it to the grave”. But in the COP Main Report; Page 8 Line 27(2) Mr. Singh told her, in the presence of Ms. Lim and Mr. Faisal, that she should take the Untruth “to the grave”. I thought RK's exact Words were "take it to the grave" and not "take the Untruth to the grave" and the context was on her "Well-Being" and a very deeply "personal experience".? Question: How come the difference between what was said by RK and the report? and why is this about? These days, Trust Cannot be Simply Granted. It's not difficult to predict that the Outcome will reinforce LHY oversea claims & complaints. I hope one day LHY and many others will safely return to Singapore. Time for Change.
What proof or evidence can public know Pritam did say that to khan? Anybody can say anything...its her words against his....damxxx waste of court time n taxpayers $$$$
In the COP findings, MOE V2, Line 13952: "TAKE IT TO THE GRAVE, I WILL NOT JUDGE YOU" are in the context of her "deeply personal experience" when they discussed her "well-being". Please read it and get the facts right.
Silly to bring down a honest and respectful PS. He done nothing wrong and they try to fix a case against him. He should not be in court answering all the merry go round questions. Really silly. 😂😂😂😂
To get a confirmed liar to be the main prosecution witness showed how low PAP is.
Raeesah is the biggest disaster for WP...
A bigger disaster for PAP. Why prosecute Pritam based on the testimony of confirmed liar Raeesah Khan?
PAP Wayang ! Wasting Taxpayers Money ! This is how PAP fix the Opposition ! Sad ! 😅
RK is completely unreliable yet the case is built on her words. i think she is lying to get back at wp .
This tell us that GRC is a joke to bring wrong person into parliament. Who implement this system? How many useless MPs alteady inside sitting and doing nothing but collecting our hard earn money?😊
Let wrong person into the party spoil reputation 😂😂😂see her very childish
A classic "he said, she said" but she is a confirmed liar. It is a "no brainer" who is credible.
Chronologically, PS actions were coherent with no trace of implied or explicit suggestion for RK to suppress the lie.
I don't believed Pritam Singh lied, he don't need to fall into Raeesah's lie and now I wonder why she had cooked up a story that is a lie, is there an intention to topple him, if so why and what or who is the source ? Mr Pritam Singh, you have my support and vote.
I have a feeling that that RK sent a msg to PS during the hearing was a bait. Fortunately, PS was focused on something else more important and did not respond to her msg right away at the time.
All these fiascos could have been avoided if only he had answered the call n INSTRUCTED her to come clean. In fact it shouldn’t even be at that “ crucial” call. The minute he knew she lied, as a leader, knowing PAP will pursue to end of the earth, he ought to have INSTRUCTED her to come clean by a certain date. He knew the 2 subsequent parliament sitting dates. That should be the dateline!
@@HulakariHulakari-ju9yb There is no right or wrong, just the COP's objection to the WP's manner of dealing with the issue.
Still remember LHL's revelation of fixing the opposition in 2006.
@@HulakariHulakari-ju9ybYour explanation shd also apply to LHL when he first learned about Tan Chuan Jin's extramarital affairs. So obvious PAP's all out to fix Oppo.
@@ewmurphy PS is the one on trial not anyone else. Even if u want to draw a parallel with LHL, don’t forget PS is the underdog n opposition trying to displace the giant. U don’t compare each other’s weaknesses. U must beat the champion to be the new champion.
@ right or wrong, guilty or innocent, that’s for the judge to decide. I m referring to LEADERSHIP. There’s such a thing as good or poor leadership. Only those who understand what good leadership entails will know the difference.
Can you help answer this question;
Referring to The Minutes of Evidence (MOE) in the COP findings, MOE V2, Line 13952: RK said they discussed her "well-being" and she shared a very deeply "personal experience", And the discussion that followed was that we would not pursue the matter further and like in my message, Mr. Singh used the words “take it to the grave”.
But in the COP Main Report; Page 8 Line 27(2) Mr. Singh told her, in the presence of Ms. Lim and Mr. Faisal, that she should take the Untruth “to the grave”.
I thought RK's exact Words were "take it to the grave" and not "take the Untruth to the grave" and the context was on her "Well-Being" and a very deeply "personal experience".?
Question: How come the difference between what was said by RK and the report? and why is this about?
These days, Trust Cannot be Simply Granted.
It's not difficult to predict that the Outcome will reinforce LHY oversea claims & complaints.
I hope one day LHY and many others will safely return to Singapore.
Time for Change.
What proof or evidence can public know Pritam did say that to khan? Anybody can say anything...its her words against his....damxxx waste of court time n taxpayers $$$$
In the COP findings, MOE V2, Line 13952: "TAKE IT TO THE GRAVE, I WILL NOT JUDGE YOU" are in the context of her "deeply personal experience" when they discussed her "well-being". Please read it and get the facts right.
Silly to bring down a honest and respectful PS. He done nothing wrong and they try to fix a case against him. He should not be in court answering all the merry go round questions. Really silly. 😂😂😂😂
👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼