New Beatles Song 2023 | Should you Preorder Now And Then?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 чер 2024
- The New Beatles song, Now and Then, is available on vinyl and cassette but the overall album art design leaves something to be desired. Overall, it's a mixed bag, in this review I'll go over the product offerings and give my thoughts. #thebeatles #vinyl #vinylrewind
►PATREON / vinylrewind
►CONTACT info@vinylrewind.tv
916-C W. Burbank Blvd 176
Burbank, CA 91506
USA
►OFFICIAL SITE: www.vinylrewind.tv/
►FACEBOOK: / vinylrewind
►INSTAGRAM: / vinylrewind
►TWITTER: / vinylrewindtv
Vinyl Rewind is your home for vinyl related content on UA-cam. New uploads feature vinyl-based music reviews, video essays, artist interviews, and collecting tips, for both the novice and expert vinyl enthusiast. Vinyl Rewind is dedicated to preserving an analogue lifestyle in the digital age. Watch-Listen-Learn
00:00 Introduction
00:33 Overview
02:11 Positives
02:58 Negatives
07:20 Final Thoughts
When I saw the cover on Amazon, I initially assumed that the real image wasn't yet available and that Amazon had just thrown together a generic, temporary image. Now that I realize that it's the actual cover, I'm shocked.
Exactly. Looks like a temporary cover image. 😊
Same here
I am / was in the exact same mindset. I'll be very disappointed if this is the final image.
Thought that too... That's why I'll buy the Blue album...
@@mynahworks i think that it is.... mockups just for "Pre sale".
I love knowing that I will be able to say that I was alive and got to experience the release of a Beatles song! In that sense, I am very grateful for the 'Now and Then' project! But I feel they messed up with the cover... I mean, it really doesn't look like the cover of the Beatles' last song.
Be careful what you wish for - this was my exact feelings back in 1995 when Free As A Bird was announced - I would doubt since I purchased that CD in late 1995, that I've played it more than 10 times. The Beatles created the greatest music ever from 1962 to 1970 - everything since is just a crappy money grab - and I've got the receipts to prove it! Hope this last gasp is worthy of their legacy but not holding my breath. Sorry to be such a downer, but been through this before myself personally.
@@Borella309weird take, it’s money in the bank but it’s definitely not bad, there’s effort there
@@Borella309i liked free as a bird, there's something to it
Free as a Bird is decent and I really also enjoy the video. Real Love is a nice song.
The cover of the Now and Then single isn't only a terrible idea, but may well be one of the most boring sleeves ever.
When I think of Lennon going to art school, marrying a girl he met at art school, then marrying a conceptual artist, Paul who spent the mod sixties Immersed in the underground art scene, to go the photographer and the general artsy take of their entire existence, I wonder how anybody involved took a look at this cover and think wow!
Sore the artist is fine.
But it says nothing.
Why did they not put the name of the band on the single.
I type this and you echo my points. It doesn't look Beatles.
It is NOT a "Beatles" song in the first place
Totally with you on the cover... It doesn't say "Beatles," it says, "I'm completely unqualified to be designing this cover."
You ever see the "white album" stop crying
100% agree on the cover. For what is the last Beatles song, you’d expect much better
The title of the single just screams for some creative art and interpretations.
Maybe this awful cheap lazy cover will make more sense to us after we hear it?
I don't think it should be consider a shallow criticism considering The Beatles history with graphic design. I mean, they're the band that made Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band and Abbey Road, you'd expect a little more effort on the art of is (supposedly) going to be their last official release.
@@williamdezynski7342 No !
I actually like the back cover more. I agree with what you said about it looking more Beatles-esque than the front. But then why didn’t they choose that for the front cover? That legitimately looks WAY better. Had that swapped places with the bland cold basic photo on the front, it would have felt more like a Beatle Product.
That cover looks like something George Harrison would have liked in the 70s.
At first I thought it was a placeholder until the real cover was available. 😢
I largely agree, I would have preferred the single to include Free as a Bird and Real Love on the B-side (updated versions using the same AI to better extract John's parts because 1) they should all be on the same disc as they belong together (especially the tape version) and 2) we would be able to hear the effect the ai on the other songs to get a better idea of what it has done that couldn't be done in the 1990s). Cover definitely does not look Beatles
I was thinking the same thing. It would be cool to have the other two reworked. But who knows, maybe they tried and felt that the other parts no longer meshed as well.
Why not making an EP with the Beatles recording of Free as a Bird, Real Love and Now and Then on the A-side; and John Lennon's demos on the B-side?
@@luismarioguerrerosanchez4747 You're making way too much sense! The thick heads at Apple didn't consider all options, probably.
Yeah that would have been great and/or I thought if not free as a bird and Real love they could've remade/enhanced watching rainbows. The quality is better than of the other 3 songs and every Beatle was on it when it was recorded. Ringo and Paul could upgrade the bass and drums on that, clear John's voice with AI and add other instruments and give it maybe a psychedelic touch. Now and then and watching rainbows would've been perfect I think.
All it did was allow them to isolate the vocals from the original demo. It’s all in the 12am doc. Nothing fake was added. The tech just cleaned up what was unusable. The press keeps saying the vocals are AI. They ain’t. Thats misunderstanding the technology. Also - Free As A Bird and Real Love (vastly less quality compositions compared to now and then) will get an equally updated deal. This is a promo for the red and blue albums.
Who would've thought that in 2023 we would be getting a new Rolling Stones album, and a new Beatles song?!
New song? Sure?
The songs on the likewise ugly packaged "Hackney Diamonds" are nothing to write home about.
I only liked the one song that Keith is doing the vocal on.
When I saw the cover art for the single, I assumed it was a temporary image put out because they didn't know what the official image was going to be. I cannot believe that is the finished product. Let's be absolutely frank; the artist has failed.
Maybe they will recall this cover and paste over an alternate cover creating a collectors item?😂
There should be an International competition on creating the ultimate packaging
of the very last Beatles single !
I would have preferred an image of the demo cassette as the cover over what we're getting. That said, I am certainly looking forward to hearing the new song.
I think this should have been an EP of Free as a Bird, Real Love, and Grow Old With Me (the version with George Martin’s strings).
YES. well have to go to abbey road stuff with this song and those all together in an ep of the final beatles songs. With the 70s vibe
I completely agree with you with the cover art for Now and Then. I hate it. But it is what it is. And the prices, you're so right! $80 for the three LP set. $40 for two cds? It's too much but I can't wait to hear the expanded "Red" album and single. Great video like always!
I completely agree on the single art. It's a total letdown, especially compared to the FAAB art. I personally didn't like the McCartney 3 art, and I'm not surprised this was by the same guy haha. The handwritten name would've been infinitely better
I always thought Johns early single cover art from apple is just classic, so I thought it has to be minimalistic. At least they‘ve done that.
Looking at that T-shirt I would say "I can't wait to hear the new song 'New & Them'."
THANK YOU for commenting on the outrageous price! I would love to get the marble or blue vinyl 45, but at $19 for a single, I feel taken advantage of. That’s just an unreasonable price. When the new Anthology songs came out in the ‘90s, they cost the same as anyone else’s singles. Remember how the Beatles used to not include their singles tracks on their albums because they didn’t want to rip off their fans?
I believe that the real reason for not putting their singles on the albums - was because in those days
having a hit single climbing to the no. 1 position was the ultimate goal !
They didn't want to take the risk that young folks with a limited amount of money perhaps would drop
buying the Singles and wait for it till it appeared on an album.
I believe that the reason given of "not taking advantage of their fans" played a minor role here.
The primary goal was to boost the sales of the 45's - and having a no. 1 HIT !
The old reason why in the UK the Beatles didn’t put singles on albums so as not to take advantage of their fans is a falsehood. In reality, their “fans” would buy the singles AND the albums both. So they were actually profit maximizing this way. It doesn’t take much thinking to get past the bs does it?
Don't forget about shipping on some websites the shipping is 11 bucks that's in total 30 dollars for 2 songs. Ouch!
I dig the cover art, but I'd like more than text with a blue background like you said.
I am very excited about this release, but agree with you wholeheartedly about the presentation. No disrespect to the artist or to anyone who likes the cover, but it almost looks like a placeholder cover. With so many legitimate artists and photographers within the Beatles themselves,why would they think this looked good? On the other hand, this is the group that once had a plain white cover for an album! But I too would have preferred the T-Shirt logo as the cover. A more befitting cover, in my opinion, would have been a bunch of photos in a scrapbook book or something akin to the Anthology cover, but more modern. Still, all that aside, I am looking forward to it. Not sure which I’ll get, but at those prices, I’ll put it on my holiday wish list as a collectible. I also agree It would have been nice to have the other two “last” songs on there as well. Enjoy your show!
You are completely correct about the cover. I've been waiting for this release since the day I heard about it. However, I've skipped over the ads on my social media feeds because it didn't register as a Beatles product at all.
Because of the cover image, I just thought it was some other band and so I just scrolled on by. It was only after seeing this video that I realised what it was I've been scrolling past these last few days. Crazy design choice.
Your not the only one. I was thinking the exact same thing about the cover art work.
I’m with you on the cover. It actually stopped me from investing in the vinyl.
I saw the title of the mail and got pretty excited. But then saw the artwork and the high price point and now am less excited to pick it up.
I was a mild Beatles fan, maybe saying I was an “appreciator” is a better way to put it till I saw Paul live last week and experienced what it is, I think that makes their songs exceptional! Those Beatles songs he did play live were so filled with emotion and amazing writing that even I with my mild knowledge of their work, cried like a baby a few times and I don’t count myself as an overly emotional sort, but oohhh boy he got me good. So to say I was excited when I saw this announcement was an understatement, though yes, the cover kind of lacks what I’d expect from a Beatles cover, though is it an attempt to create something akin to what they would do as a modern band? I don’t know but I sure do hope the song hits a lot harder than the cover does…
where did Paul play? I'm jealous.....glad it was fun
@@PolPotsPieHole Melbourne AUS, was my first time seeing him, hopefully not the last
You didn’t experience the Beatles. You experienced Paul.
@@BeyondDictation sweet
@@derrelferguson4594 and?
Listening to demos of the song, the song sounds really dark. I can imagine John sitting in that all white room with little to no furniture other than the white piano like in the Imagine music video recording the demo there. The gray and blue tones on the cover make sense, but I agree they definitely could've done more. The back cover is more enticing than the front cover and I would prefer it to be the front cover in the theme of t he other two Threetles 7" covers. I'm excited this is getting released finally and I'll be picking up the marble blue vinyl and black vinyl to keep sealed.
According to McCartney, the very last thing that John Lennon said to him was :
-- "Think of me Now And Then" !
I think it would’ve been cool to finally give us Carnival Of Light and have that as the B-Side.! The cover is a bit strange I agree, but overall, truly excited to finally hear this song.!
Isn't Carnival of Light rather long for a 7" 45 RPM record?
@@markstevenson6635 I think it’s supposedly around 12 minutes long or a little over that. Don’t know.? Maybe a 12inch single.? Just wish for something different except same old same old. I mean. I love all those songs, but how many times do certain things need to be re-released.?
it could have gone on the 12" then. Give us something.
I'm sad there was no CD single. I have the other two on CD and I'm sad we're not able to complete the trio
Yet another idiot desission from the Apple Corp. Organisation !
You can get it on cd! I've pre ordered my copy on cd
Same here. When I First saw the Front cover I thought It was a dummy cover to make It more exciting for us until the final artwork will be released. I never would have expected that this is it. (I am a Graphic Designer btw.)
Yeah I assumed that it was temporary artwork, and that free bird and real love would be included
They need to do this to treat Real Love and Free as a Bird. Great songs that I’d love to see John’s voice pulled out of the tape.
I hope they do. We need a proper EP.
perfect cover art: "Now and Then" on a brick wall on street signs with postcard-style pictures around it of the band over the years, in a style similar to the back of Abbey Road or the Anthology cover
or if going minimalist, just plain white with the black handwriting like the shirt
For the first time in my collecting history, there's a Beatles product I have no desire for. Maybe it's that cover. Maybe I'm just burnt out. Maybe both. Anyways, great video, great take as always.
Already pre-ordered it! I am very excited to hear a 'new' song by the greatest band of all time!😎
I think the fact the cover does not look like a "Beatles Product" is why it's grown on me. It reminds me of The White Album, or how Abbey Road does not have the band's name on the front. It stands on it's own, it does not feel like a "HEY REMEMBER THE WORLDS BIGGEST BAND, THE BEATLES?" type image you might find on a t-shirt at Target.
The front and back are sticking with me, in a way that other more conventional mockups I saw on Reddit are not. I'm still not in love with it, but I appreciate it being an interesting choice.
I do agree though the lack of it being paired with Free as a Bird and Real Love in the 12" single or on 1967-1970 is disappointing. The already have restored versions of those songs from the 1+ Bluray that never made it on to any CD.
As an actual graphic designer with a degree - I actually think the cover art rocks, lol. I think it's stark and there's a gravity to it while being so understated and grave, I mean - it IS the final Beatles single. I think if they tried to be intentionally extravagant that the album cover wouldn't have as much of a staying power. I think you being disappointed feeds at least a small bit in that it's a provocative design, so in my opinion it filled its purpose. After all, this wouldn't be the first time the Beatles would have controversial reception to minimalist artwork. People reacted the same way when the White Album was out in 1968.
🤓
What they SHOULD have done is release an EP and include Free As A Bird and Real Love but remixed with the same new A.I. technology.
While I'm still going to get the blue 7 inch, and the cassette (I'm a collector, I can't help it lol) I agree with the cover art. What would have been interesting for the vinyl's artwork, is to have a picture of the actual cassette, I feel like it would have been a bit more interesting(and for the cass. cover, maybe the last pic of all of em together? idk) The cover somehow feels like it would've been a bootleg album.
Must consoom
@@gonzalomgt exactly lol
Picture 4 Beatles signatures , one on each corner and handwritten by John in the center: “Now and Then”. The flip side concentric circles, darker towards the center in which the Beatles logo appears.
I totally agree about that front cover. It's giving me vibes off some minimalist 80s indie band.
Hello, Eric I feel the same way about the cover art, I thought at first it was a tease and the cover art would be released on the date of the album. But as you said this is what they are going with. But its all about the music in the end so now we wait......
McCartney must have exerted his authority because of his like for that artist.
Shame he wasn't voted out.
Considering the historical significants, being their last single, I'm saddened by the lack of care shown here.
That cover art honestly looks like something from the early 90s... which is when they would have been working on it with George. So, while I don't think it's great, it is fitting for when it was last worked on.
Which is an odd thing to go for
As a professional graphics artist for over 35 years, the cover blows big time, as well as the price, but I really look forward to hearing it.
I agree with everything you said about the cover also I would’ve liked free as a bird and real love to be included with now and then
The single artwork looks like a Pickwick budget compilation album from 1978. "Now and Then" will be nothing more than a curiosity after the initial novelty, but the real interest is the new stereo mixes of the early songs on 1962-1966.
You hit the nail on the head my friend......A Limey in Portland, Oregon enjoying your content....by the way ....everything here is so BIG....!
A cd-single version would have been welcome as well. They could have easily added a additional 2-3 tracks and made it an ep. There's plenty of songs to choose from. These could have been additional songs (in 2023 mixes) not included on the red and blue albums.
Yes !
And again this was a missed opportunity.
Love this channel.
When I received the email today including the cover art I must admit I was surprised. This is so out of line with other Beatles cover art. If you line up all the Beatles albums this will stick out like a sore thumb. It might have made a nice cover for another band. The art for their very last album should have been something emphasizing this historic moment. After all, it’s now 6 decades after they got started as The Beatles. Many bands don’t know the album they just released will be their last. The Beatles know this is it. Well ok. I’m very much looking forward to hearing this song. Thank you Paul and Ringo for your hard work! ❤️ I hope you will include this song in your individual tours! ✌️
The cover of Now and Then looks like the thumbnail for some shovelware album on Spotify to me
I do agree. I can’t spend this now. I figured on asking the family for the single as a Christmas gift and getting the Red/Blues record re-releases down the line.
I agree on all points. I would have gone for the CD single if there was one. The vinyl single is too much money for one song according to me.
Absolutely agree on the cover. First thing I thought is it looks like a Seen on TV product or a Ronco records product.
I agree with you 100%! It looks like somebody dropped the ball on the record artwork or just gave up and went with the easiest, fastest thing they could make. The back looks more like a front cover than the front does. Strange!
Brian in Fort Worth 🎶
I agree on the front cover. It looks like it was self-made by/for a local bar band on a budget. The price, too. Hard to justify $20 for a song.
Some guy on Twitter said that it's a common trick in the music industry to put out a single with fake cover during the pre-sale period to throw people off. I've never heard of that being done, but fingers crossed that he's right
Woah! This appeared in my recommended before I got the notification the video was uploaded! Wow!
I'm with you 100% on the cover. I am more pissed off about the track listing. We are getting so many songs that we already have remixed remastered whatever, from pepper to let it be, to revolver. Yes there's some songs on here that we don't have that have been remixed but I don't know man. I'm on a major fixed income and I just wish they would have thought about this a little more. I mean I can't wait to hear the new song also but this red and blue thing has really got me pissed off. I was sure looking forward to rubber soul. I will be getting the single but that's it. Your video was spot on. Take Care
I think anything worth releasing was put on Anthology, as far as this, I'm sure I'll hear it on youtube lol
edit: the all text cover looks like it would be a good cover, for a book
@@keithmichael112
While people keep putting out for -- and let's be honest here -- what is below sub par materiel. They'll keep bleeding the "fans" for the ready's, right?
The fact that they put as little effort into the packaging, is, again, endigitive of what they actually think of these fans . It is a bit shameful because they know people will keep putting out because of who they are, not the quality of the material they are buying. One can't help feeling that to them its like shooting fish in a barrel for them.
The red and blue album release, again is endigative of this very sinical attitude. Which i am almost certain would not have happened if epstien was alive. I mean in a world were you can make your own play lists, these, "best of greatest" hits releases are, are at best, regressive and redundant, and there for can only be seen as what they are..... a sinical cash grab from a aydience they have little to none respect for, shameful.
Free as a Bird was based on chart sales.
Now and Then is based on streams and sales.
Most people in the country are going to listen, after the hype and thanks to the affection for the band, and because people follow what is 'trending'. People will stream just to have an opinion to 'share'. The song is extremely likely to make number one in the UK and the US.
What most people have neglected to mention in the coverage that I have seen so far, is that Now and Then is officially a double A Side.
That means that Love Me Do will be technically a.number one single too.
Get it now?
But I agree with the point you make about money and material.
Free as A Bird and Real Love would have been a perfect double A Sided single. They chose two separate releases.
That's fine. But after all the material dug from the vaults for Anthology, what ends up on one of the B sides?
Christmas Time is here again!
Possibly the greatest atrocity the band ever put on vinyl and I am guessing never played by anybody on that format more than twice. Once to hear it was awful, and again just t check they were not dreaming. It was almost as if they thought, this is too bad to go on Anthology, people will want to skip it, so where can we put it?. Oh, I know, chuck it on a b side.
That's cool.
But. When releasing your first single in 25 years, shouldn't more thought go into making the product pristine?
@@rainblaze.But nobody has to buy the records. All the new remixes are available for free.
I agree the cover art is lazy.
But these releases are marketed expressly for middle class men with too much money. They fund the fact the rest of the world can listen for free. Thanks suckers!
I mean, no disrespect to the maker of this video but even he said he's going to buy the record even though he hates the packaging and thinks price wise it's a rip off.
At least fork out the extra two dollars and buy the coloured vinyl which is in limited numbers, unlikely to be re-pressed and makes you feel you got something different.
Fact is. Nobody but reviewers who get free copies are ever going to play these records. They will remain sealed on shelves as potential investments. It is a shame. It wasn't what music was meant to be.
So Now and Then is art. But it is not art that is meant to be enjoyed. It came from the vaults and will end up in vaults. The cover reflects this. Some people will buy anything.
I know what the Mona Lisa looks like. I don't need to own it. It, like all art now, is only a click away. The red and blue are like the official souvenirs you buy from the museum gift shop, reproductions of the original. The single, unfortunately looks like the tat you buy from the unofficial bloke who sells cheap plastic replicas of the leaning tower of pisa, oddly from a bazaar in Egypt.
@@rainblaze.* indicative*..*cynical * ...* audience *.
I fully agree on the cover. It looks like i could have created it with some standard computer paint program functionality in less than an hour.
I think it should have even be more minimalistic. Like early John apple singles. Big black fonts, on a white surface.
It would have been nice to try to clean up Free as a Bird and Real Love and have it as an EP. At least we can stream it when it comes out.
Does anyone else find it hilarious how an alive Paul McCartney is releasing new beatles with dead Beatles on the track. Like there's got to be a backwards track saying "I buried John" or "George is deadman, miss him miss him"
I agree about the cover artwork, which I also found underwhelming. The folk art on the back is interesting for a few moments, and then left me wanting to see something different. Maybe a photo of John at the piano, with photos of the others in a studio, Maybe it would be good to have a picture of the cassette, which you pointed out must have looked like John's demo cassette tapes. I preordered the 12", since it was only $3 more than the color 7" discs. I figured that maybe there is some more artwork on the sleeve, or some notes. We'll see.
Thanks - very informative ❤ 💯 agree on the cover and the release strategy. I don’t even know which one I’ll get because nothing is appealing
You're so right. That's not a Beatles Cover and price is just a joke. Not worth. A great chance missed to close the Beatles cataloge in the way this legacy deserves
The cover of “Now and Then” looks like one of those “greatest hits” cds you find in the dollar store, (but are really re-recordings by ONE of the band members passed off as a real greatest hits cd.)
The Now and Then single cover looks like Windows95 picture art
I agree about the cover. The first time I saw it I thought it was a placeholder graphic because the real cover wasn't released yet. I think it would have made sense to apply the same demixing technology to Free As a Bird and Real Love. Maybe there wasn't much they could do to improve the vocal on those.
vinyl cost are insane right now. It really doesn't make sense to make 7 inches right now unless you charge almost 20 dollars.
I think you are spot on about the cover art being horrible I would have preferred a nice group shot from the 1968 Mad day out photo shoot that has been underutilized in Beatles stuff
That being said since it’s a single cover it’s less important - the free as a bird and real love single covers were better but in the end the single covers are not really thought about in the grand scheme of things
Totally stoked about the song and I don’t have a record player anymore so I’m just going for digital downloads/ streams which are cheaper 😁
Keep up the good work!
Your bemusement and frustration about the pic sleeve art is shared by many including me
I think a picture of that cap John would wear in 1964/5 with the song title in his hand writing would've been a good cover. Or maybe the band's iconic instruments (Ringo's bass drum head, Paul's Hofner bass, John's Rickenbaker and George's 12 string Rickenbacker) either pieced from period photos or modern photos.
Right with you there about "Beatles tax", pricing & the cover concept...
Your position is right on! I agree with all the points you raise! Thank you for your honesty.
Shame they don't offer the new song as a CD single like the previous Anthology songs.
Also could have included a rarity on the B-side instead of Love Me Do
agreed. Watching rainbows or something would have been nice
Or an out of tune version of Besame Mucho in Get Back
I’m totally with you on the cover art. But I loved his work on McCartney III. I’m planning to get the marble 7” and the red 12” from Target.
I agree with your opinion on the cover. If that is the final cover. Maybe it isn't? But yes, it reminds me of a 1980s HBO movie ad, if you remember the screen GUI that HBO used to promote their films.
Great show as always! Vinyl is alive and well! Btw, can you tell me the make and model of that fantastic tan leather chair?
Great review 😊 !
$75 for the Red and Blue albums is also ridiculous. ($150 for the box set) Plus $15 for shipping!!! I am usually pre-ordering these new mixes from the get-go but I will wait for the Amazon discount to appear (as has been the case with all the other releases) and forgo the colored vinyl as it's only available from the official store.
It took me a minute to understand why they went with "Love Me Do" original single as the b-side, but after a while it made sense...this is the last of the Beatles, on the opposite side is the first of the Beatles...Now...and Then.
As for the price point, it is usurious. And the artwork should probably have matched the Free as a Bird and Real Love artwork...
Some liner notes on the back would have been nice. I’ll look at it once and then it goes on the shelf. Can’t wait to hear the song though and THAT won’t stay in the shelf 😊
I think the cover really fits John's late 70s style and fits the understated vibe of the song. Its the back cover that rubs me the wrong way, it looks like a corporate attempt at folk art to me.
.
That being said I also can't believe they didn't include Real Love and Free as a Bird, such an obvious miss.
I just hope that the 12 inch is it 45 RPM or is truly a cash grab.
Agreed! It’s definitely a weird decision, but if it were 45rpm, at least then it’d be more understandable (like MoFi’s releases).
Lol you're spot on about the cover looking like an old war novel, I have an old copy of the book Catch 22 and that's what it looks like hahahaha
As someone who is CD first, vinyl second, the lack of a CD single is very saddening.
I thought the single art was a mockup they use when final artwork is not available. A total misstep.
It has no “The Beatles” logo, no photo, unrecognisable font, it’s very weird.
And the prices are ridiculous, but isn’t all vinyl way too expensive these days?
Cover art is an afterthought because they're assuming that everybody will be streaming it. Or maybe I'm wrong and a lot of effort went into that artwork but that was they best they could do with the limited crayons in the box.
Am I the only one that likes the cover? love the 70's look to it
They should have released the long awaited Carnival of Light with Now and Then.
Carnival of Light is not a Beatles recording. It was a solo McCartney recording.
@@Withcare11So what?
I’m so excited for the day!
The front cover of single took me back as well 😅
I have pre-ordered the marble version but I agree about the cover. The image of the cassette would have been better.
Couldn't agree more about the cover
Very excited for the song obviously, I think Love Me Do wasn’t a bad choice (I would’ve preferred Free as a Bird and Real Love)
but as a graphic designer I think I’m going to have to apply for a job at Apple because there was so much that could’ve been done with the cover. Even if they wanted it to be simple and minimal, but That image is not Beatles
I still ordered a 12” and 7” 😂
A diversity hire was tasked with making the cover. I can almost guarantee it.
Man vinyl rewind W right here
Side note, that brown suit is sharp AF! 🙌🏻
WOW! That's how I combed my hair from '58 till '67!
It's going to be on the reissue of the blue album. I will probably get both the red and the blue on cd! 😊
I felt the same with the cover art, i was like "what the?!" Respect to the artist I'm sure he's great, but that's not it
I agree with all you’re saying. A weird cover and a missed opportunity to collect all 3.
I agree with the cover, not Beatles-esque, and the price point is irritating, although, I won’t be buying any physical copies. I can’t wait to hear the song of course, but after hearing the demo a few times previously, I’ll be amazed if it becomes as good as Free As A Bird and also Real Love. With all that being said, it’s The Beatles, and I just hope we get something good