EMF and flux explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • An explanation of flux and how a changing flux leads to an EMF
    Covers Faraday's Law too
    See www.physicshigh.com for all my videos and other resources.
    If you like this video, please press the LIKE and SHARE with your peers. And please add a COMMENT to let me know I have helped you.
    Follow me
    facebook: @physicshigh
    twitter: @physicshigh
    Support me at Patreon: www.patreon.com/highschoolphysicsexplained

КОМЕНТАРІ • 82

  • @akshatzz_iitb6052
    @akshatzz_iitb6052 3 роки тому +20

    I still don't understand how does changing flux produce emf

  • @yousuf.x77
    @yousuf.x77 3 роки тому +5

    يمكن انا الطالب الوحيد يلي جاي من حصه زياد رواشده 😂♥️

  • @anuragvipin9317
    @anuragvipin9317 4 роки тому +39

    The best video regarding flux in all of UA-cam. Thanks a lot. I'm only in 10 th yet understood it perfectly. Keep up the good work

  • @varmaavinash1020
    @varmaavinash1020 5 років тому +29

    Such a beautiful explanation.
    From 🇮🇳 ❤

  • @mmekucuk
    @mmekucuk 6 років тому +22

    Really helpful and it finished all my confusing. Thanks a lot

  • @duckyoutube6318
    @duckyoutube6318 Рік тому +2

    What determines the magnitude of flux? And how much energy escapes from the system because of flux?
    Is flux the same as friction?
    These are the questions i have had in my head all week. Hope the video answers them.

  • @TheWizardVampire
    @TheWizardVampire 4 роки тому +7

    Love the rain analogy.

  • @emmalintelman9852
    @emmalintelman9852 3 роки тому +15

    Absolutely fantastic! I don't think I've understood a physics concept faster. I hope your students realize how lucky they are to have you. Thank you so much.

  • @jeffclark2675
    @jeffclark2675 Рік тому +3

    I have a BSEE degree which obviously included multiple classes in high level electromagnetic field and calculus....in the 5 minutes it took to watch this video i now understand the physical component of this concept better than i ever have...bravo sir!

  • @guitarttimman
    @guitarttimman 2 роки тому +3

    This is a great straight forward way of explaining this concept. Thank you.

  • @AshrafGhedan
    @AshrafGhedan 2 роки тому +1

    من طرف زباد الرواشدة :)

  • @caleblott399
    @caleblott399 2 роки тому +3

    Give this man a medal!

  • @rachnagupta7311
    @rachnagupta7311 5 років тому +4

    This is the best explanation!!!!

  • @anthonypape6862
    @anthonypape6862 2 роки тому +2

    Can you please help with the following questions:
    1) every demo on this topic uses a rotating coil or copper loop or a magnet fixed to a rotor and facing a stator of copper coils. Sometimes a magnet is pushed into and pulled out of the coil. The question is: Is one method superior to the other
    2) along your line of rain analogy. What if instead of rain I had a powerful garden hose opined right in the middle of the loop as you rotate it. And compare with giant drum of water that when poured consumes the entire area of the loop. Assuming the exact same amount of water sits through the loop is one type of flux preferred k we the other )super concentrated bs large surface area?

    • @Rayan-id3gk
      @Rayan-id3gk 2 роки тому

      Number 2) I assume you mean what if it was between 2 small magnets which produce a narrow B line. Well it doesn’t change much because eventually flux is still going to equal 0. It just means that it would take a little longer to actually start making a difference from maximum flux

  • @roshanrawal4134
    @roshanrawal4134 2 роки тому +2

    Clear concept of flux❤ thank you!

  • @artificiallift9110
    @artificiallift9110 6 років тому +11

    Such a great explanation, keep it up

  • @justinejacob6369
    @justinejacob6369 5 років тому +2

    Fantastic explanation. Thank you.

  • @dr.waleedsalem
    @dr.waleedsalem 2 роки тому

    Thanks to explan

  • @vihanroy2842
    @vihanroy2842 4 роки тому +1

    Hi
    I was wondering if you could give us a video on EMF vs Potential Difference. Or just an explanation.
    Thanks

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  4 роки тому +7

      Actually the two are the same.
      Emf is the old term but we now understand it as voltage or potential difference

  • @davidm3210
    @davidm3210 3 роки тому +1

    Very helpful, thank you!

  • @grahamh7041
    @grahamh7041 3 роки тому +1

    Great analogy - thanks.

  • @RohitThakur-fz8ic
    @RohitThakur-fz8ic 6 років тому +1

    tx my confusion was now clear

  • @tanayparekh789
    @tanayparekh789 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you sir for making the concept seem so much more easier.

  • @Festus2022
    @Festus2022 2 роки тому

    BUT> what if you had 2 loops to collect rain, both loops perfectly aligned (as in a wire coil)? Would the flux double? You are still collecting the same amount of rain, but your 3D area has doubled. Would the RATE of flux change stay the same or double?

  • @bradlyons6828
    @bradlyons6828 4 роки тому

    If two like sides (two magnetic north polarity sides or two magnetic south polarity sides) of wafer or ring magnets are forced together with super glue or epoxy cement, would this create a high density or concentrated magnetic flux field? If so, would the flux field produce a scalar wave energy field around the two magnets glued together? If anyone knows, please leave me a reply. If the two magnets glued together are placed on a sheet of copper, would the concentrated magnetic flux field energize the copper? If the two magnets glued together were placed inside the resin of an orgonite pyramid or orgonite charging plate, would the magnetic flux field of the two magnets cause the orgonite to convert positive ions into negative ions?

  • @xila8861
    @xila8861 3 роки тому

    Thankyou. I still didn't understand the negative part.

  • @georgestanciu5466
    @georgestanciu5466 2 роки тому

    Can I ask what is in the magnetic flux lines? what they contain?

  • @dopemjay6697
    @dopemjay6697 3 роки тому

    I like u....im subscribing liking and all there is to it

  • @umaisharahman6109
    @umaisharahman6109 3 роки тому

    Thankuu soo much for this It helps vryyy muchhh😊

  • @meenothkumarkrishnakumar829
    @meenothkumarkrishnakumar829 2 роки тому

    tnx, really helpful to understand the concept.

  • @AhmedEbrahim-ct6ii
    @AhmedEbrahim-ct6ii 4 роки тому +1

    Brilliant ❤

  • @te4683
    @te4683 2 роки тому

    Yes. Finaly. Now i understand. 🥇

  • @pravin4416
    @pravin4416 3 роки тому

    THANK YOU SO MUCH SIR FOR THE WONDERFUL EXPLANATION...... KEEPING TECHING LIKE THIS FOR US.....

  • @see576
    @see576 2 роки тому

    thanks a lot for this intuitive explanation

  • @shanumohammed4422
    @shanumohammed4422 3 роки тому

    Love from iNDIA 🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @syncstudy8792
    @syncstudy8792 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir 🙏

  • @dhruvalwadhi
    @dhruvalwadhi 2 роки тому

    BEST EXPLANATION OF FLUX EVER!

  • @gloriainnocentia1389
    @gloriainnocentia1389 3 роки тому

    wow. such an awesome pedagogy

  • @meorluk5133
    @meorluk5133 2 роки тому

    thank you, this is what I needed

  • @kavyajain2210
    @kavyajain2210 3 роки тому

    How rate of change of flux is maximum when flux is zero. Plz explain it🙏

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  3 роки тому +2

      I thought I did. When flux is zero on the graph, the slope of the graph is at a maximum. That slope is the rate of change of flux.

  • @angelsintahoe
    @angelsintahoe 6 років тому +3

    Did he say the 3rd graph is the EMF?

  • @Poop-nu1so
    @Poop-nu1so 5 років тому +3

    You are a great teacher, thanks for your video!

  • @mahuubao
    @mahuubao 2 роки тому

    Excellent ... well done ...

  • @gauravkumar-fr4si
    @gauravkumar-fr4si 3 роки тому

    beautiful explanation

  • @coleabrahams9331
    @coleabrahams9331 4 роки тому

    This is a great analogy

  • @YourDailyDoseofContent
    @YourDailyDoseofContent 3 роки тому

    super useful thanks

  • @nikylemoodley6629
    @nikylemoodley6629 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you for posting this video. My textbook does not explain it properly.

  • @rubamadi5361
    @rubamadi5361 3 роки тому

    This is so clever

  • @shearer8368
    @shearer8368 4 роки тому

    YOU ARE A LEGEND

  • @no-de3lg
    @no-de3lg 5 років тому

    Emf stands for electro magmetic field right ?? Does this emf represents the electron motion in the atom so negtive means electron nearest the next atom and postive means the electron farthest away from thr next atom and this change is what causes the production of emf radiation

    • @mosup5007
      @mosup5007 4 роки тому

      force

    • @vaadwilsla858
      @vaadwilsla858 4 роки тому

      It stands for electromotive force... The idea is that when you have an induced electric field (so one created by a change in magnetic flux) it will create a current. A current is basically the motion of electrons, and to move the electrons there must be work done. The current moves over a closed path: consider the work done to move a unit charge over the closed path as the emf. It gets confusing, because the emf is not actually a force, it is a measure of work per unit charge, and therefore has units Nm/C or simply Volts. It is an example of unfortunate naming in physics.

  • @sivakumaranbazhagan1672
    @sivakumaranbazhagan1672 4 роки тому

    what is that delta t in the denominator , is it time?

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  4 роки тому +2

      Yes. The delta just means “change in”.

  • @where0is0my0mind
    @where0is0my0mind 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much for this video! Such a clear explanation.

  • @pepsiatlas5452
    @pepsiatlas5452 5 років тому

    neat

  • @amirtheshappu9378
    @amirtheshappu9378 3 роки тому

    ❤️

  • @yonatanbitterfeld3347
    @yonatanbitterfeld3347 3 роки тому

    love the analogy

  • @suryajaps2395
    @suryajaps2395 3 роки тому

    What is this emf?

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  3 роки тому

      EMF is a voltage or potential difference

  • @guybro1709
    @guybro1709 6 років тому +2

    Hello sir, around about 2:56, for the graph for flux, instead of oscillating between the positive and negative region shouldn't it always be positive? As flux is purely just a measure of the amount of field lines threading through the loop?

    • @madagalaharivardhan9412
      @madagalaharivardhan9412 5 років тому

      Please reply ... I also having same doubt

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 5 років тому

      I think you're right. I've never seen "negative rain" in a bucket ;-) But mathematically there is a change of sign after a rotation of 1 pi in a sine-function.

    • @pravinm21
      @pravinm21 4 роки тому +1

      The cosine vector changes from 0° to 90° to 180° to 270° and back to 360° which is equal to 0°. Substitute the angels and that's why it oscillates through positive and negative side.

  • @ryanthegooch5952
    @ryanthegooch5952 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much!

  • @ZaibJ
    @ZaibJ 7 років тому +1

    Helps so much!!!

  • @kathalberto1332
    @kathalberto1332 4 роки тому +1

    THIS SAVED ME ;-; THANK YOU

    • @PhysicsHigh
      @PhysicsHigh  4 роки тому

      You’re welcome

    • @mohamedtaha2025
      @mohamedtaha2025 4 роки тому

      @@PhysicsHigh plz can you explain further why the rate of change for magnetic flux start from maximum
      I can't understand why it starts at the maximum value!

    • @Maddy-pf9ib
      @Maddy-pf9ib 4 роки тому

      @@mohamedtaha2025 If you graphed a tangent to the flux function, you would see that after 0 the gradient of the function decreases until it reaches 0 (local max)

  • @exodusmercy303
    @exodusmercy303 3 роки тому

    Finally i understand this lesson thank you