My dad worked at University of Penn for 43 years. He worked on the cyclotron machine, he called it the atom smasher. I won first place in the science fair in high school with electromagnetism demonstrated with a copper coil wrapped around a bolt and a little compass. Thanks for your video it brought back good memories.
the summary of this video are: -as the current increases, the magnetic force increases. -based on the experiment done, we can conclude that forces come in pairs, and energy is conserved (when mechanical energy transform to electrical energy) lastly electrical behavior is not intuitive like the mechanical behavior. Lenz's law states that the current induced in a circuit due to a change or a motion in a magnetic field is so directed as to oppose the change in flux. group: anis afzan nur syafiqah bt lukman nurul batrisyia
This is a very helpful video with a nice selection of demonstrations. This said, there seems to be a small error at 4:20. The blue arrows indicating an eddy current are both being illustrated as being in the same direction. The assertion of a number of other texts in this field shown these currents as running in opposing directions.
2:56 simply wow. No one ever taught us that. Isn't this age of technology amazing that we can learn from any professor from the best universities in the world. We no more have to depend on our talentless teachers in our school who have no interest in teaching.❤👍
If red is north which is the convention, your flux lines around the ring at 0:50 are in the wrong direction if your intention is to show the flux lines generated by the induced current in the ring. See Walter Lewin 8.02X Lecture 16 Lenz's law segment 9 minutes into the video for the correct explanation and learn, University of Pennsylvania ...
depends on how fast you push it, if its fast enough to induce eddy's currents it will slow down and the deceleration will be grater at the begining, and then it will leave the tube at the constant speed it decelerated to.
@4:30 he states there are three forces, two magnetic forces and gravity. The only problem is, gravity is not a force, it is an effect. The electromagnetic forces experienced by the magnet in the tube are detectable, gravity is not. Gravity is still not understood. No one has yet to explain why two objects with the same surface dimensions with vastly different weights fall at the same velocity.
I pretty certain that gravity is a force. Gravity is well understood in how it effects objects. Am I wrong to state that there relation is documented in Newtons law of universal gravitation. As for "why two objects with the same surface dimensions with vastly different weights fall at the same velocity." Has that been observed to happen?
If i harvest cane sugar all day , do i collect more joules of energy than i used? It’s very easy to create blanket statment laws but even easier to break those laws with the same manipulative double speak !
I’ve been watching lots of videos on Lenz’ law and this is among the best. I remember in grammar school there was a man who demonstrated hovering a pizza pan above (what I suppose was) a large electro magnet. I remember that he used gloves to remove it before it became too hot. Is there the same phenomenon with the magnet and the spinning disc?
Interesting and educational video. I got some pointers regarding my tiny home-project. It is similar, but also not similar at all. Science is fun, when using the Lego-principle. 'I have these bits, I want to build a car, but I might end up with a hovercraft'. -Goal accomplished, just inadvertedly way more fancy. I love taking the laws of Newton, Planck, Faraday, Wildeman, Lenz and certainly a couple of more, toss their laws around and use them like building Lego. If/When I fail, I'll have learnt much. -If I succeed... *Eyebrows will rise* I am just a simple man, how on earth, would I be able to make scientists swoon...
00:09 🧲 Opposite poles of magnets attract, and moving a conductor through a magnetic field induces an electric current. 00:38 ⚖️ Lenz's Law states that the induced magnetism in a conductor opposes the change in magnetism that produced it. 01:19 🔄 When an aluminum ring falls between the poles of a horseshoe magnet, the induced current in the ring creates a magnetic field that opposes the magnet's field, slowing down the ring's fall. 02:14 🧪 Lenz's Law serves as a critical test for scientific theory, allowing for accurate predictions. 02:53 ✂️ A ring with a cut (breaking the closed path for current) falls unimpeded through the magnet, showing no effects from Lenz's Law. 03:32 🗂️ Stacking rings to form a tube and dropping a magnet through it shows each ring's current opposing the magnet's fall. 04:42 🔄 Energy is conserved when converting from mechanical to electrical energy; you can't get "something for nothing." 05:20 🚄 Lenz's Law is applied in magnetic levitation (Maglev) technology. 06:27 🌀 A spinning aluminum disk can lift a magnet off its surface due to the induced magnetism. 07:07 ⚙️ Electrical behaviors, though less intuitive than mechanical ones, still follow the same fundamental laws of physics. Made with HARPA AI
I understand that current does not get induced in the cut ring, but does EMF get induced in the ring with the small cut in it as it falls through the magnets? If it does, how do we determine which end is positive and which is negative?
Hello and thank you for the video, it is very thorough yet simple and pleasant to follow and understand. :) I have a question about the 3 forces acting on the magnet falling down a tube: gravity and the two electromagnetic forces. If the two electromagnetic forces counteract each other, wouldn't gravity be the only force left acting on the magnet? Or did I get it wrong and the two electromagnetic forces counteract the force of gravity? Why do the two electromagnetic forces not cancel each other out? Sorry I am a new student to this. :) Thank you!
watch 4:35-4:41 from what I've heard, he said that the two electromagnetic forces counteracted the gravity, so eventually the net force acting on any direction on the magnet would be zero (cmiiw)
There is a clockwise induced conventional eddy current above the falling magnet and a counterclockwise induced conventional eddy current below the falling magnet. Each of these eddy currents have their own magnetic fields which as the professor said, pull up on the magnet from above and push up from below. So the falling magnet reaches a very low terminal velocity due to the two upward forces each countering gravity.
Please tell me if I'm understanding this correctly. When a non-magnetic conductive object meets two opposing magnetic fields, a current is produced. That current turns the non-magnetic object magnetic. So in the case of mag-lev technology when the non-magnetic object picks up speed against a magnet the current becomes greater which makes the magnetic effect greater. This repels the magnet and creates the levitating effect. Is that correct?
So professor , Do you think this type of new bicycles use this technology for resistance? for example: IC4 Indoor Cycle (brand: lifefitness) or SuperDuke Magnetic H945 (brand: bhfitness)
What my objection to the last one was that ,suppose,when the magnet is kept touching to the circular rotating disk,and suppose ,for an instant of time 'dt',the magnet comes in contact with and area 'dA' of the disk .So ,according to me if it comes in contact with an area dA,a current should be induced in that area ,which is so obvious.and ,as soon as that particular are moves a little away from the magnet,the magnet field lines passing through that area ,which has and induced current, decreases, so ,then accordingly, the leaving area dA should exert an attractive force towards the magnet and an area dA1,which has just approached the magnet,and due to which the number of field lines passing through it increases,should exert a repulsive force;and both of these forces should cancel each other everytime,eventually not letting the magnet float or move away from its position.. Isnt that true?
Hi I’m working on a UA-cam video discussing Faraday’s Law, and your demonstration is fantastic. Would it be okay to use a brief clip of this video to help explain the concept in my own content? I’ll make sure to credit you and link back to your channel. Thank you for the great work, and I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks to the Lenz effect, everyone can now easily and securely harness this negative force and add it to the total output possible from their system. Lens’s theory is the motoring effect in a generator and a generator effect in a motor. Lenz’s theory becomes a law when one is harnessing that negative output to add to the whole system. I suppose one has to own a bank to get something for nothing.
Engaging charging turbines to front wheel drive may be redundant. I need to assemble a phrototype and see what happens going uphill downhill city and highway driving. I need this job.
It is a fact that power companies use the ability to change the phase relationship between voltage and current. Moving a magnet past a conductive loop induced a simultaneous voltage and current that reflect back the two components of electric power as the magnet moves. This puts the reaction in the conductor against the energy of movement in the magnet (the reflection is inverted.) changing the phase relationship of the magnet and loop would change the result, you don’t have to keep pounding your finger with a hammer after you hit it once. If the moving magnetic field and source charges of the magnet were inducing a charge in a capacitor, the opposite charge would attract the magnet’s charges first increasing the movement energy, then retard the movement as it moved away from the capacitor (a dance of first increasing the energy, then decreasing the energy; no absolute getting something with a direct cost (BTW, the energy generated depends on the rate of movement, so more energy is produced while approaching than is used to retard as it moves on.) then exchanges are not linear, amplification, getting something for nothing is the law of nature. Build a bifilar coil as Tesla patented it about 100 years ago and do the same experiment. The moving magnet will be accelerated through the loops, not retarded. Looks like a free lunch, but it’s using the capacitor to charge before the inductor (like it does in all LC circuits, and then force the inductor to do its thing as the magnet begins to discharge the cap as it moves away, creating a perfectly timed magnetic field that assists, not resists the moving magnet (nature produces both movement and electricity amplifying energy input to generate the electricity. It is a lie to say you must expend as much energy as you get to make electricity. Physics is not limited to unproven philosophical hypotheses, it is a science expressed by what can be done, even when the philosophical model fails to support reality.
Ever since Elon Musk announced his intention to catch SpaceX’s Superheavy Booster, I’ve been wondering if Lenz’s Law would be one of means used towards achieving that goal.
We want this type of physics not in the in the written form or in imagination or to rut but we want it practical to get more benefit of it because physics is love ❤
No current means no resistance. Voltage is present. The more current required the stronger the opposing force. That's why a generator bogs down under higher loads. We can design rings that produce more current with less heat and use thesetypes for next generation electric vehicles. Use larger copper current carrying conductors outside of turbines to lower resistance and prevent voltage drop. My vehicles will utilize flywheels and gearboxs at higher voltages to rotate turbines that will only be under load when heating or ac is needed or if the vehicle needs electric propulsion. The rest of the time the secondary battery will be charging. A depleted battery offers little resistance and accepts a charge with less force. More force will be required to top the battery off if you will.
Solar power generation depends on Photovoltaic effect and efficient design requires a thorough understanding of solid state and semiconductor physics. There are no physical moving parts and no need to know Lenz effect for a Photovoltaic scientist. They have 100 other problems to worry about for designing a high efficient and stable solar cells and panels. The research is still ongoing on all the fronts. The silicon based solar panels of today are only 10% efficient and has a lifespan of 25 years.
So what about the inventors who have figured out a way to defeat lenses law and produce generators that have no resistance but still generate power? Lenses law only applies under certain conditions change the conditions and you can defeat lenses law. Which means your statement that you don’t get something for nothing is incorrect ,defeat lenses law and you can Generate electricity with very little input force at first then once it gets going no force is required.
Excellent presentation and well put together video, thanks. Just a though experiment as I don't believe Lenz's law is at play here. It seems that the mass of the aluminum ring is changing. Could this not be explained by the dielectric planes of inertia combining to change the mass of the ring? In other words, the field medium through which the ring (or magnet as in the copper tube) is falling is being altered as coherency is being induced in the aluminum? Rather than magnetic, I see this as a dielectric phenomenon. The field mass of the magnet is combining with the ring as it falls. Cheers
Makes you wonder why people still use diesel engines in trains to move about. The answer is rather simple: The energy needed to move such a heavy thing is above huge which would result in so many magnets it would be ridiculous. Not to mention potentional interference with electronics and other metal parts laying around the track along the way or two trains meeting each other on opposite tracks (remember what happens when you put two magnets together). There is a magnetic train in use but it is a closed circuit for city usage only and this concept most likely won't expand any time soon. The reason is mainly cost (building, maintenance and running) and the efficiency over a regular railroad is not that big so it would compensate for the higher costs.
The ring falling through the magnetic doesn't prove anything except that a magnetic field is induced. Same with the copper tube and magnets. How could an opposing/repelling magnetic field be induced by another magnetic field? It would literally cancel it out. It would prevent the field from being induced as soon as it was induced. If the magnetic fields were not the same, electricity generation would create a feedback loop, inducing current from rotor to stator, back to rotor forever, and melt the wires in the process. Also, why would it change direction just because the magnetic field is moving away or toward the inductor(?). It only makes sense that the induced magnetic field is in the same direction as the original magnetic field (attractive). Besides, if it was correct, transformers wouldn't work. They would not only be a load on the electrical circuits, the same feedback loop would happen, and transformers wires would literally melt from the induction feedback loop. What actually happens in a transformer is that the magnetic field reproduces the electric current in the secondary circuit. Similarly, you can increase magnetic flux by increasing turns ratio. The magnetic field is being reproduced in the iron core (a small initial magnetic field becomes much larger when repeatedly coiled around it). Magnetic flux is not ever used. Neither is electricity. They just flow through conductors. It's not like electricity is being dragged along by magnetic fields like a mechanical action. It's a perpendicular force (suggesting it's not directly related mechanically). So it's possible to get "something for nothing". I'm certain that your explanation is incorrect, and it has huge consequences.
6:40 You can get nothing for something. Why can't you get something for nothing? What about something from nothing? Start off with nothing and get something, like an equation, for example: 0 = -1 + 1. From that equation, I was able to derive a negative unit and a corresponding positive unit. So, did I just prove you wrong?
is it me or do even people think that is okay it goes like whatever faraday said was correct because he thinks and assumes whatever he said was right and others just followed him what if someone else was there and they found a new law a new equation will it be the same or different there might be new equations new law many more so what do you think are we just following the words of the people told or are we just saying it correct because no one else knows the way to get a new law or new discovery
Just to ram home the idea that we do get more power than we personally inject, compare the ring test with the cut-out repeat; If you add the enegrgy you used to cut the ring, then see that the result got less power than the first test displayed, you see that more energy input can waste energy, if you do the wrong thing. If you get two guys jump from a height onto a giant bladder and a third person is catapulted into a lake from the other end of it, that person was just sitting there using no energy. The two just took a small step. They may have taken an e-bike up to the jump-off point. My point is the energy always comes from somewhere, but the individual does not have to provide much of it; this globe is packed with energy, and we just have to harness it. It's why men rode horses millennia ago.
My dad worked at University of Penn for 43 years. He worked on the cyclotron machine, he called it the atom smasher.
I won first place in the science fair in high school with electromagnetism demonstrated with a copper coil wrapped around a bolt and a little compass.
Thanks for your video it brought back good memories.
That's cool
the summary of this video are:
-as the current increases, the magnetic force increases.
-based on the experiment done, we can conclude that forces come in pairs, and energy is conserved (when mechanical energy transform to electrical energy)
lastly electrical behavior is not intuitive like the mechanical behavior.
Lenz's law states that the current induced in a circuit due to a change or a motion in a magnetic field is so directed as to oppose the change in flux.
group:
anis afzan
nur syafiqah bt lukman
nurul batrisyia
What about solar panels
Very true. I hope people accept lumens, current and field lines as basic terms instead of replacing 85% of our known universe with dark energy.
This is a very helpful video with a nice selection of demonstrations. This said, there seems to be a small error at 4:20. The blue arrows indicating an eddy current are both being illustrated as being in the same direction. The assertion of a number of other texts in this field shown these currents as running in opposing directions.
ঠিক বলেছ।
a brilliant demo from a well versed professor.
Very informative in a clear, easy listening voice. A big thanks.
one word that i can say "amazing". i understand it well...
Same
@@understandundergo8548 what's the name of this Prof.
Can you discuss mor about it with me
Understood**
Excellent presentation. Demonstration, explanation all at a level to induce interest and learning. Thank you
2:56 simply wow. No one ever taught us that.
Isn't this age of technology amazing that we can learn from any professor from the best universities in the world. We no more have to depend on our talentless teachers in our school who have no interest in teaching.❤👍
If red is north which is the convention, your flux lines around the ring at 0:50 are in the wrong direction if your intention is to show the flux lines generated by the induced current in the ring. See Walter Lewin 8.02X Lecture 16 Lenz's law segment 9 minutes into the video for the correct explanation and learn, University of Pennsylvania ...
Thank you!! I spent a whole days trying to understand what lenzs is saying this is helpful
4:20 what would happen if we were in space and we pushed the magnet into the tube?
A good one
depends on how fast you push it, if its fast enough to induce eddy's currents it will slow down and the deceleration will be grater at the begining, and then it will leave the tube at the constant speed it decelerated to.
EB thanks
@@ali-xn8hs then more energy is required hence it's still not efficient
@4:30 he states there are three forces, two magnetic forces and gravity. The only problem is, gravity is not a force, it is an effect. The electromagnetic forces experienced by the magnet in the tube are detectable, gravity is not. Gravity is still not understood. No one has yet to explain why two objects with the same surface dimensions with vastly different weights fall at the same velocity.
I pretty certain that gravity is a force. Gravity is well understood in how it effects objects. Am I wrong to state that there relation is documented in Newtons law of universal gravitation.
As for "why two objects with the same surface dimensions with vastly different weights fall at the same velocity." Has that been observed to happen?
If i harvest cane sugar all day , do i collect more joules of energy than i used? It’s very easy to create blanket statment laws but even easier to break those laws with the same manipulative double speak !
Very interesting.
this video totally understand the fact of EMI
Thank you sir 🙏🙏
I’ve been watching lots of videos on Lenz’ law and this is among the best.
I remember in grammar school there was a man who demonstrated hovering a pizza pan above (what I suppose was) a large electro magnet. I remember that he used gloves to remove it before it became too hot. Is there the same phenomenon with the magnet and the spinning disc?
wow wow wow just wow, I regret that I just tried to learn physics from books. This was so intuitive and enlightening. Thank you
Interesting and educational video. I got some pointers regarding my tiny home-project. It is similar, but also not similar at all.
Science is fun, when using the Lego-principle. 'I have these bits, I want to build a car, but I might end up with a hovercraft'. -Goal accomplished, just inadvertedly way more fancy.
I love taking the laws of Newton, Planck, Faraday, Wildeman, Lenz and certainly a couple of more, toss their laws around and use them like building Lego.
If/When I fail, I'll have learnt much. -If I succeed... *Eyebrows will rise*
I am just a simple man, how on earth, would I be able to make scientists swoon...
00:09 🧲 Opposite poles of magnets attract, and moving a conductor through a magnetic field induces an electric current.
00:38 ⚖️ Lenz's Law states that the induced magnetism in a conductor opposes the change in magnetism that produced it.
01:19 🔄 When an aluminum ring falls between the poles of a horseshoe magnet, the induced current in the ring creates a magnetic field that opposes the magnet's field, slowing down the ring's fall.
02:14 🧪 Lenz's Law serves as a critical test for scientific theory, allowing for accurate predictions.
02:53 ✂️ A ring with a cut (breaking the closed path for current) falls unimpeded through the magnet, showing no effects from Lenz's Law.
03:32 🗂️ Stacking rings to form a tube and dropping a magnet through it shows each ring's current opposing the magnet's fall.
04:42 🔄 Energy is conserved when converting from mechanical to electrical energy; you can't get "something for nothing."
05:20 🚄 Lenz's Law is applied in magnetic levitation (Maglev) technology.
06:27 🌀 A spinning aluminum disk can lift a magnet off its surface due to the induced magnetism.
07:07 ⚙️ Electrical behaviors, though less intuitive than mechanical ones, still follow the same fundamental laws of physics.
Made with HARPA AI
I have a doubt sir is it possible to design such a body which can be used for elevated transportation through this lenz law application
Nicely done. This video should be required homework for all the UA-cam proponents of free energy devices involving motors and generators.
I understand that current does not get induced in the cut ring, but does EMF get induced in the ring with the small cut in it as it falls through the magnets? If it does, how do we determine which end is positive and which is negative?
Hello and thank you for the video, it is very thorough yet simple and pleasant to follow and understand. :)
I have a question about the 3 forces acting on the magnet falling down a tube: gravity and the two electromagnetic forces. If the two electromagnetic forces counteract each other, wouldn't gravity be the only force left acting on the magnet? Or did I get it wrong and the two electromagnetic forces counteract the force of gravity? Why do the two electromagnetic forces not cancel each other out? Sorry I am a new student to this. :)
Thank you!
Ur right gravity is the only force left, but acceleration doesn't take place so u can't say it's exactly gravity.
watch 4:35-4:41
from what I've heard, he said that the two electromagnetic forces counteracted the gravity, so eventually the net force acting on any direction on the magnet would be zero (cmiiw)
@@calvinlloyd2517 that is a terribly wrong answer
There is a clockwise induced conventional eddy current above the falling magnet and a counterclockwise induced conventional eddy current below the falling magnet. Each of these eddy currents have their own magnetic fields which as the professor said, pull up on the magnet from above and push up from below. So the falling magnet reaches a very low terminal velocity due to the two upward forces each countering gravity.
That is a professional explanation and well concluded and great elaborated
why does the force point upward on the ring?
Free energy folks has defeated Lenz's law with law of faith !
The magnets in the tube reach an equilibrium speed, similar to terminal velocity.
That was a well done demo. Thanks. If I may ask. How is Lenzs' Law and the Lorentz force related? Is there a link that can demonstrate this?
Please tell me if I'm understanding this correctly. When a non-magnetic conductive object meets two opposing magnetic fields, a current is produced. That current turns the non-magnetic object magnetic. So in the case of mag-lev technology when the non-magnetic object picks up speed against a magnet the current becomes greater which makes the magnetic effect greater. This repels the magnet and creates the levitating effect. Is that correct?
So professor , Do you think this type of new bicycles use this technology for resistance? for example: IC4 Indoor Cycle (brand: lifefitness) or SuperDuke Magnetic H945 (brand: bhfitness)
Great explanation ever.....crystal crystal ❤️🇮🇳
What my objection to the last one was that ,suppose,when the magnet is kept touching to the circular rotating disk,and suppose ,for an instant of time 'dt',the magnet comes in contact with and area 'dA' of the disk .So ,according to me if it comes in contact with an area dA,a current should be induced in that area ,which is so obvious.and ,as soon as that particular are moves a little away from the magnet,the magnet field lines passing through that area ,which has and induced current, decreases, so ,then accordingly, the leaving area dA should exert an attractive force towards the magnet and an area dA1,which has just approached the magnet,and due to which the number of field lines passing through it increases,should exert a repulsive force;and both of these forces should cancel each other everytime,eventually not letting the magnet float or move away from its position..
Isnt that true?
Excellent presentation, thank you !
Bill P.
thank you! this was honestly very helpful ♥
Hi I’m working on a UA-cam video discussing Faraday’s Law, and your demonstration is fantastic. Would it be okay to use a brief clip of this video to help explain the concept in my own content? I’ll make sure to credit you and link back to your channel. Thank you for the great work, and I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks to the Lenz effect, everyone can now easily and securely harness this negative force and add it to the total output possible from their system. Lens’s theory is the motoring effect in a generator and a generator effect in a motor. Lenz’s theory becomes a law when one is harnessing that negative output to add to the whole system.
I suppose one has to own a bank to get something for nothing.
I wonder what else we don’t know about magnetism and electricity. God is Awesome!
and what if the north and south poles were placed horizontally along the tube? will there even be a flux through each ring slice of the tube?
Amazing explanation 👌, thank you very much sir..
Excellent explanation! Thanks.
Great demos, good animation, physics well explained
Didn't pronounce it 'choob'
7/10, would watch again.
¡Esto es lo que necesitaba sabeeeeeer! GRACIAS ❤
Engaging charging turbines to front wheel drive may be redundant. I need to assemble a phrototype and see what happens going uphill downhill city and highway driving. I need this job.
It is a fact that power companies use the ability to change the phase relationship between voltage and current. Moving a magnet past a conductive loop induced a simultaneous voltage and current that reflect back the two components of electric power as the magnet moves. This puts the reaction in the conductor against the energy of movement in the magnet (the reflection is inverted.) changing the phase relationship of the magnet and loop would change the result, you don’t have to keep pounding your finger with a hammer after you hit it once. If the moving magnetic field and source charges of the magnet were inducing a charge in a capacitor, the opposite charge would attract the magnet’s charges first increasing the movement energy, then retard the movement as it moved away from the capacitor (a dance of first increasing the energy, then decreasing the energy; no absolute getting something with a direct cost (BTW, the energy generated depends on the rate of movement, so more energy is produced while approaching than is used to retard as it moves on.) then exchanges are not linear, amplification, getting something for nothing is the law of nature.
Build a bifilar coil as Tesla patented it about 100 years ago and do the same experiment. The moving magnet will be accelerated through the loops, not retarded. Looks like a free lunch, but it’s using the capacitor to charge before the inductor (like it does in all LC circuits, and then force the inductor to do its thing as the magnet begins to discharge the cap as it moves away, creating a perfectly timed magnetic field that assists, not resists the moving magnet (nature produces both movement and electricity amplifying energy input to generate the electricity. It is a lie to say you must expend as much energy as you get to make electricity. Physics is not limited to unproven philosophical hypotheses, it is a science expressed by what can be done, even when the philosophical model fails to support reality.
Wonderfully clear. Thank you!
Ever since Elon Musk announced his intention to catch SpaceX’s Superheavy Booster, I’ve been wondering if Lenz’s Law would be one of means used towards achieving that goal.
What if instead of aluminium ring we use iron ring which is basically a ferromagnetic in nature
Sir pls tell me in what form the electrical energy formed is converted
Magnetic induction
We want this type of physics not in the in the written form or in imagination or to rut but we want it practical to get more benefit of it because physics is love ❤
No current means no resistance. Voltage is present. The more current required the stronger the opposing force. That's why a generator bogs down under higher loads. We can design rings that produce more current with less heat and use thesetypes for next generation electric vehicles. Use larger copper current carrying conductors outside of turbines to lower resistance and prevent voltage drop. My vehicles will utilize flywheels and gearboxs at higher voltages to rotate turbines that will only be under load when heating or ac is needed or if the vehicle needs electric propulsion. The rest of the time the secondary battery will be charging. A depleted battery offers little resistance and accepts a charge with less force. More force will be required to top the battery off if you will.
What about solar panels
Solar power generation depends on Photovoltaic effect and efficient design requires a thorough understanding of solid state and semiconductor physics. There are no physical moving parts and no need to know Lenz effect for a Photovoltaic scientist. They have 100 other problems to worry about for designing a high efficient and stable solar cells and panels. The research is still ongoing on all the fronts. The silicon based solar panels of today are only 10% efficient and has a lifespan of 25 years.
Wow____so amazing technique to understand
WTH they do not teach like this in schools :\
They do enough sleight of hand by one way observation. No explanations! Comprehendo? 🙈
They do in university! When you have a professor who still cares that is
So what about the inventors who have figured out a way to defeat lenses law and produce generators that have no resistance but still generate power? Lenses law only applies under certain conditions change the conditions and you can defeat lenses law.
Which means your statement that you don’t get something for nothing is incorrect ,defeat lenses law and you can Generate electricity with very little input force at first then once it gets going no force is required.
Honestly well explained, thank you.
Sir your teaching is ossom
brilliant examples. thank you.
لحم لحلو
Thanks sir.Great job
Excellent presentation and well put together video, thanks. Just a though experiment as I don't believe Lenz's law is at play here. It seems that the mass of the aluminum ring is changing. Could this not be explained by the dielectric planes of inertia combining to change the mass of the ring? In other words, the field medium through which the ring (or magnet as in the copper tube) is falling is being altered as coherency is being induced in the aluminum? Rather than magnetic, I see this as a dielectric phenomenon. The field mass of the magnet is combining with the ring as it falls. Cheers
Good perspective maybe another demo would help prove your theory wrong .
What if I use a stick to force the magnet down the tube
Do I get more energy?
Also pls share your skincare regime
Best explanation ever .
Amazing demonstration
Thank you very much sir 🙏🙏😎😃
excellent presentation
Explaned very beautifully
Cool demonstrations...
Really helpful
I wonder what overall effect on earth could be predicted by Lenz's Law that during the Sun's magnetic pole flips every 11 years (a solar cycle).
pretty clear demonstration! Thank you.
Who is that man ?? Tell me pls
Makes you wonder why people still use diesel engines in trains to move about.
The answer is rather simple: The energy needed to move such a heavy thing is above huge which would result in so many magnets it would be ridiculous. Not to mention potentional interference with electronics and other metal parts laying around the track along the way or two trains meeting each other on opposite tracks (remember what happens when you put two magnets together).
There is a magnetic train in use but it is a closed circuit for city usage only and this concept most likely won't expand any time soon. The reason is mainly cost (building, maintenance and running) and the efficiency over a regular railroad is not that big so it would compensate for the higher costs.
Shanghai Airport to city center uses Maglev train. The only one of its kind in the world currently functioning.
The ring falling through the magnetic doesn't prove anything except that a magnetic field is induced. Same with the copper tube and magnets.
How could an opposing/repelling magnetic field be induced by another magnetic field? It would literally cancel it out. It would prevent the field from being induced as soon as it was induced.
If the magnetic fields were not the same, electricity generation would create a feedback loop, inducing current from rotor to stator, back to rotor forever, and melt the wires in the process.
Also, why would it change direction just because the magnetic field is moving away or toward the inductor(?). It only makes sense that the induced magnetic field is in the same direction as the original magnetic field (attractive).
Besides, if it was correct, transformers wouldn't work. They would not only be a load on the electrical circuits, the same feedback loop would happen, and transformers wires would literally melt from the induction feedback loop.
What actually happens in a transformer is that the magnetic field reproduces the electric current in the secondary circuit. Similarly, you can increase magnetic flux by increasing turns ratio. The magnetic field is being reproduced in the iron core (a small initial magnetic field becomes much larger when repeatedly coiled around it).
Magnetic flux is not ever used. Neither is electricity. They just flow through conductors. It's not like electricity is being dragged along by magnetic fields like a mechanical action. It's a perpendicular force (suggesting it's not directly related mechanically). So it's possible to get "something for nothing".
I'm certain that your explanation is incorrect, and it has huge consequences.
Thanks 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
IT IS VERY HELPFUL....THANKYOU!!!
Great explanation
There are a couple of guys out there that Avoid the lenz effect
Add an iron by the magnet and you destroy Mr Lenz
Amazing explanation Sir!!!
U are great 🙏🙏🙏
6:40 You can get nothing for something. Why can't you get something for nothing? What about something from nothing? Start off with nothing and get something, like an equation, for example: 0 = -1 + 1. From that equation, I was able to derive a negative unit and a corresponding positive unit. So, did I just prove you wrong?
Thanks. Greeting from Angola.
impeccable
It is amazing!
Thank you sir. 11.09.2022
Nice use of a PC slot blanker. 5.49
Great jon sir.
nice job!
very clear
So we don’t get the electromagnetic feild of the earth for free. Did he just say that ?
is it me or do even people think that is okay it goes like whatever faraday said was correct because he thinks and assumes whatever he said was right and others just followed him what if someone else was there and they found a new law a new equation will it be the same or different there might be new equations new law many more so what do you think are we just following the words of the people told or are we just saying it correct because no one else knows the way to get a new law or new discovery
❤❤❤💖❤❤❤🧡❤💖
❤Thanks
THANKS A LOT
Just to ram home the idea that we do get more power than we personally inject, compare the ring test with the cut-out repeat; If you add the enegrgy you used to cut the ring, then see that the result got less power than the first test displayed, you see that more energy input can waste energy, if you do the wrong thing.
If you get two guys jump from a height onto a giant bladder and a third person is catapulted into a lake from the other end of it, that person was just sitting there using no energy. The two just took a small step. They may have taken an e-bike up to the jump-off point. My point is the energy always comes from somewhere, but the individual does not have to provide much of it; this globe is packed with energy, and we just have to harness it. It's why men rode horses millennia ago.
wah re wah pohran vip
We are so thankful.
This is what yt was made for.
Thanku very much sir
❤❤❤
Beautiful
Great man
No words😇😌
Very interesting
👍