Dalio fears a kind of civil war in which the rule of law is ignored, elections are not respected and truth is lost. Watch the full conversation at charlierose.com
That moment is here and has been for some time. Could it lead to violence? It already HAS led to violence. We lost truth because people have become loyal to a party like they are loyal to a football team. And they don't even care what they stand for. They just want to win.
Perfect analysis. Nobody is interested in reasoned argument leading to a conclusion. There is ONLY tribalism.... It's like Northern Ireland 1969 on a grand scale... NO front lines required, just terrorism.... Reading UA-cam comments..nobody says "You are right I have changed my mind". Floating voters (persuadables) have evaporated and an un-elected, un-firable, un-appealable partisan Supreme Court is now in charge of the country ... They could confirm Compulsory Church tithing and gun ownership etc .. Easily.. They own the country now... The coup happened and was successful
I am a conservative and cant say I know his personal opinion, I honestly dont know if he leans Dem or Republican but he is spot on here. I think going forward neither side is going to accept losing, or follow orders from the opposing side after defeat, ultimately leading to war.
@@dandylandpuffplaysminecraf8744 my point is Im Republican but his point seems neutral and his point could be from either side. Both Dems and Republicans could have an opinion like his and its true. You now have Dems upset about Roe vs Wade, alot of people oppose mandated vaccines, etc. A tipping point is going to be reached within the next ten years to trigger some form of civil war in America
@@CapeFear1 being upset about having constitutional rights taken away is not the same as staging a government overthrow. One is a legal protest, the other is betrayal of the oath of office.
@@CapeFear1 I was a Republican for 35+ years until the insurrection. The party has to return to its fundamental roots if it wants to represent the lower and middle classes again. I would expect it to get replaced by a another party and go the way of the Whigs in the coming years.
Declaration of Independence: "That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
Ask that question to the millions of American expats that live abroad. Most are retirees, and plenty of young people, who are digital nomads. They seam happy to leave America’s toxic identity politics.
this country is falling apart. First it will be abortion rights then gay rights then interracial marriage rights. All the things happening in this country from the inequality of certain groups to the ridiculous rulings they are pushing for are leading to civil war and i cant wait because either way first chance i get im leaving this awful country. Im bisexual and im moving to Australia to be with my boyfriend sooner or later and if civil war happens it will make leaving that much easier for me
@@unusg1 first off women's rights have failed to be placed in our constitution to equal men. Second our constitution is currently being attacked by the religious right.
@@unusg1 freedom of the press, free speech, freedom of body autonomy, right to bear arms, right now new York is proposing that in order to have and or keep arms you're online activities are monitored ie red flag laws, now we know this will be open to abuse and would violate the 4th amendment.
I don't think so. I go out among my community and have pleasant exchanges with everyone without knowing their political affiliation. There only appears to be division because the media says there is. It's ridiculous.
@@asphyxiafeeling i disagree if we are reasonable then do away with the two party system. the fact that two party have to battle show that we should be seperate country. how are we a country when all states dont practice the same right s
@@asphyxiafeeling The after 8 pm "media" on Fox who make MILLIONS stirring up FEAR and hate and giving talking points to people in easy chairs just coming off an hour of Jeopardy and Wheel OF Fortune.
@@randallfowler9348 Depends on where you live, it's the same here in Europe. In bigger cities, everything will be more like the madness you see online, while on the countryside everything is still pretty much fine.
It’s getting to the point where you can’t pick a side because neither represents your beliefs. And nobody should be surprised by anything that happens anymore. 9/11 was the last time I was surprised.
I live in Mexico and can tell you that the difference in the US and Mexico is the justice system and the rule of law which is like money , it is only worth what the populus agree upon.
I think Ray was uncomfortable with his opinion. But he made sense to me! Might not be a civil war. We would face much worse. A tyrannical system of government.
@@riodejaneiro4793 I have several friends that are Police officers. They are not arresting people anymore because 1) George Floyd and the possibility of the officer spending the rest of their life in prison for doing their job. 2) Corrupt District Attorneys letting violent criminals off based on personal bias. Our military, police and court systems have been significantly weakened, probably on purpose. As you stated, this will lead to anarchy.
@@riodejaneiro4793 Both of such outcomes would be tyrannical, for anarchy means governance would become local, arbitrary, and still in the hands of the few: mob vs mob. And all tyrannies begin with a tyranny of fear. We're already far along that path.
Anarchy is An=without + Archo= ruler. Anarchy as philisophical theory is a valid discussion. Tyrannies often start with not just fear, but famine. Look at the good supply chain right now. Look at global policies and hownthey are set to actually exacerbate food distribution. Yhey plan to starve us into compliance.
@@riodejaneiro4793 not the more likely scenario. What has the elites been telling us g or generations? Brave New World, 1984, and Davosman? What can we see as absolute fact in present reality? Surveillance is the opiate that the state nor the corporation can do without. No way they can NOT partake. Scientific dictatorship. That's what is emergent. Now surveillance under the skin is reality. Delivered via "vaccines"?
@@iamhudsdent2759 I am good gaining wisdom from experiencing his interviews about the world we live in, which are unlike any others in the history of television.
It's great to see Charlie Rose back doing what he does best. I've been a fan of his work for many years, and I haven't forgotten the unceremonious manner in which the networks dismissed him and hoped to erase a man's entire award-winning career in the blink of an eye. It was both shameful and cowardly behavior from the very same corporations that had benefited so greatly from Charlie's unique contributions to journalism for decades prior. Those who currently sit in the chairs once occupied by Mr. Rose are not even in his league. Wishing him all the best moving forward.
Hmm, “doing what he does best”? You mean representing and promoting a leftist point of view. His PBS show was always incredibly unbalanced. His progressive, PC guests he’d coddle and give them all the time and sympathy in the world. His relatively few conservative guests, or anyone that didn’t keep to the lefty party line, he’d be incredibly aggressive and short tempered with, cutting them off, interrupting them throughout, with constant displays of sarcasm. No, not a fan. I stopped watching him years before he was canned, with only very rare exceptions if there was a guest I especially wanted to see.
@@rah62 He was fired and shamed. Went from the top, to humilation. That was also over a decade ago now. I'm sick of cancel culture. Watch something else if you hate the guy.
The rule of law is obviously important, but not blindly, and when those in power abuse the rule of law to subjugate their people, at some point Jefferson's reference to changing the government should be an option.
A civil war would be more harmful than the actual war itself. Police would divide because not all views are the same, military would divide because of the same reasons, and literally everything will be split into eventually fighting against your own friends, relatives, coworkers, fellow soldiers, students etc.. We would see mass exodus of people moving to a certain half of the city/state/country like a mass migration to establish fortifications to sides. its an absolute worst case scenario for the future of America. It won’t be like the first civil war and it won’t even be comparable because of the connections we have to one another today. Everyone would lose.
Reluctantly, I agree that we are heading toward a civil war witj significant violence. It won't be fought with full fledged armies like in the 1860's, but with smaller groups like militias. It may be like the battles over slavery in the 1850's like in the Kansas territory.
i bet the military will join in. this war will not be fought with just militias and their AR-15s. it would be fought with all available military equipment.
You have no idea of what the future holds. None of us do. Stop pretending that you understand tea leaves and crystal balls. If violence comes, it most certainly can escalate beyond measure and quickly.
It will happen at a state level where a GOP government won't concede defeat and will try to bend the laws so a minority keeps the power. The GOP always lose the popular vote because they don't represent us. GOP don't represents WE THE PEOPLE
@@XYZ-bi9eb of course, all they'd have to do is seize a National Guard base or military installation and they have access to weapons civilians can't have like machine guns, tanks, ... nuclear weapons. Talk about the Jan 6-style wackos getting ahold of one of those places... many of them would be taking selfies yelling memes but the real militant types would be driving a nuke out to hit some "blue city" or something. They may just be let in the front door by sympathizers, God knows a lot of the sheriffs and people who do the day to day 'law enforcement' are on their side. It's pretty amazing that with a country as dumb and prone to fascistic thinking as America that this hasn't happened YET
No has the interviewing expertise of Charlie Rose. He listens to what his guests are saying. The interview is all about them allowing for viewers to learn, gain knowledge. Did not know he had a profile on YT. Glad it appeared on my homepage.
@@duanedavidson7219 No business saying anything of the sort on yt and in the US. Anyone peering into the old and esoteric, crrow for sure, and fathoms better. Are you going to tell me that Cnn or faux is better?
Brilliant man! Principals: Life & Work Ray Dalio “Thoughtful disagreement, without that how can you build a culture of independent thinkers? Collective disagreement, shouldn’t it be a source of curiosity.... Someone is wrong how do you know it’s not you without thoughtful discussion”
@@tenningale We seem to see our past in the faces of famous people, and that’s why we adore them! Nay, we also seem to adore older wealthy people! Ray Dalio sounds like a good father, and his wise counsels are the wisdom of an older man. Another important note, Ray Dalio and Charlie Rose remind us of another America long gone.
People should start standing up to the Media and the Politicians and taek back our Rights ie. Free Speech, Freedom of Choice, Privacy..and any other Right that has been eroded by the powers that be....
@@situated4 He was fired 12 years ago now. Paid the price for it. I'm so sick of cancel culture. The guy isn't going to win a popularity contest, but let him work at what he's so very good at. If people don't want to watch, so be it. If guests don't want to show up on this new show, they don't have to. Plenty more avenues out there for everyone.
I don't see two sides moving further apart. I see one side essentially staying in the same place and the other side moving further and further away. Example: 100% of all people in the U.S. could define what a woman is 5 years ago. Now, a good chunk can't do that anymore. The same people get angry because they're called a he rather than a she, or a she rather than a they. These aren't universal issues that people are dealing with around the world. These are people in the United States who are looking for a fight and creating excuses to explain away their anger at the world and to have a reason to say they "oppressed" -- So much progress has been made in this country that people are literally having to go out and create reasons to say they're oppressed. Let that sink in. They're going to get the fight they're looking for, too. Their failed policies are causing hardships on everyone. But, do they admit it and reverse course? No, they're doubling down!
"Dalio fears a kind of civil war in which the rule of law is ignored, elections are not respected and truth is lost." (description) this is all TRUE right NOW! the war is ON ray ... what are the SIDES is the question?
You are right,and Ray is right. I think that it's inevitable.We cannot continue down this road of unfairness.The divided country stuff is a joke. It is full blown war forever.
In the last 30 years workers' salaries have remained stagnant, and poverty has increased immensely; while at the same those who set the salaries of workers (executives) have seen their wealth increase in proportion. Just where do you think their money came from? Just how much can people be squeezed till they say, "No more!" One would like to ask Mr. Dalio: "What did YOU do to ensure that the people who worked for your company shared in the wealth of your company so that they didn't have to struggle?"
Exactly. Why are we giving audience to a big finance guy? He's engaging and I love what he says, but when did the TRUTH become such a difficult issue? Good luck America cause you're sure as shit gunna need it. China has most certainly got your number and cunts like this guy served it up with Billy Clunton on a silver platter back in the 1990's
My guy…literally dropping wisdom on us. And look at the current landscape lol This man along with Munger is brilliant and many fail to acknowledge his points due to his wealth. Best insights we have seen in years
@@GwaiZai Was fired, shamed, and paid a price. I'm sick of cancel culture. He's not going to win a popularity contest, but he's outstanding at interviews, and I'm glad he's now working. If someone doesn't like him, they can be interviewed by someone else. Thousands of avenues today.
Been saying this for a while now. But there would be too much quabbling over real estate and assets for it ever to be obtained peacefully so war is much more likely.
Good to have you back Charlie! Too bad the rest of my comment keeps getting censored. Like punishing experts that predict V, it's sure not to solve the problem.
While I agree , my observations lead me to the conclusion that the US citizenry does not have the courage to fight each other, preferring to squeal from the sidelines until the ship demolishes itself.
@@Legendary_UA bud. They have squealing and bleating like goats in the south for thirty years. I have heard it over and over. The time has come to call it out. 'Y'all full of shit, scared little bitches who are too afraid of the national guard to do anything to anyone'
When the veteran demographic is made uncomfortable enough to get off the bench (like Zees); guys who actually know how to shoot, move and communicate; it will get very interesting then.
Rule of law is one of the key differentiating factors of the great USA. If that is substantially diminished, then I am not sure what the rest of the world is going to be.
At this point, the rule of law has been eroded in a tit-for-tat fashion and we are witnessing the breakup of our country into 2 countries. One side argued that the election was illegitimate (hacked by a foreign country) and then acted surprised when the other side refused to accept the election results. One side rioted and committed numerous acts of violence in various cities over an entire summer and then acted surprised when the other side rioted and went crazy for a few hours in one location. We may never see a presidential election conceded ever again. Both sides are now willing to resort to violence to get their way. We now live in a country where 2 sides want completely different laws, governments, and leaders.
Proportionaly, inequality always remains the same throughout the history. No matter under which world order people live, or which political system comunities rely on, or wich economic system everybody agrees on. The trend shows that nothing gonna shange much in the future no matter how future would look like, and that is just sad.
the name says it all... the united STATES of america, meaning that at any given point in history some states will rebel against any federal law and order and state their own rules, and that's why if one travels from texas to new jersey one can barely thinks that one is in any sort of unified country, like , lets say, france or germany
Yes. I think we are starting down that road where governors and senators are rebelling against Federal Law. It could go 2 ways, the US can get even more and more strict with civil disobedience, or we could eventually become separate countries with some degree of common participation, at least economically.
I'm for the latter. I personally don't want to live in a christian nationalist society but if thats what the folks in red states want--let them have it. I think they will have some tough lessons to learn while on their own and I doubt very seriously that they will be any less angry, they will just find a new scapegoat. You gotta wonder what the Population break down will look like in a red state country. My guess is it will be 75-80% male and 90% White for awhile and then it will be 100% white after their next civil war. I truly hope they secede even though it's almost impossible and a very messy process.
@@SeattleMartin True, I just think the differences will be far more drastic. People have been moving to where the regions best support their politics since early 2000. Now it will be like escaping a highly intolerant situation just so you can live a remotely normal life. How many Married Gay couples will stick around in TX if the state stops observing their Status? Worse yet, what happens to those same people with a far more emboldened far right/fascist militia goes around harassing or brutalizing those that do not fit their version of Patriot? Then its more like Refugees fleeing hostile states! It will probably not only be militias but actual state agencies. Fun times ahead. I wont spend a dime in or visit the Christian Nationalist territories any longer!
@Jeremy Serwer Your comment is so ironic. Do you have any idea how many people have ‘fled’ to Texas from blue states in the last 2-3 years? We can’t keep them away! If some leave to have their marriages recognized by a state and to get abortions good!
@@rebeccajohnson3402 So the bigger thing to pay attention to is; you are a bigot if you're totally OK with Gay Marriage being outlawed and you're a misogynist for not wanting Women to have control of their own bodies, right? We had 5 million idiots vote for trump in CA so I'm guessing you got a fair number of them as they're just as intolerant as you are and they get scared of different lifestyles than their christian nationalist way of life. I'm so glad they left, far less chance of one of them losing their mind and shooting up an event that they cannot tolerate. Enjoy living like its the 1870's again. You'll be so happy when the TX GQP outlaws voting for POC again!
@@cactusjackNV Most christians are not Vehemently Anti Choice, mostly its just the Evangenitals and Catholics. Most other religions are not hung up on Abortion and probably 60% of US christians want some form of Abortion to be available. Same Goes for marriage Equality and definitely free access to contraception. My issue is with that group that represents about 35-37% of the US that think they should be the shot callers on Morality for the whole of us. That is sheer insanity, no thanks we are not under some Christian Nationalist rule and we should be doing everything to assure that does not happen--so this SCOTUS situation needs to be expanded to water down the Christian Fascist elements -- its just not who we are as a country at all!
Glad that I stumbled onto Charlie Rose on UA-cam. Yay! I miss watching you on tv, especially your interview program on PBS. I have felt that we are in some kind of psychological warfare situation currently. Civil war, unfortunately is not that far off in my opinion. I hope not, but we have become quite divided on some key issues, and no one is showing signs of backing down. I've had to train myself not to talk politics, as I don't want to get punched out. Some people get very angry, very fast, in this current political climate.
It's a culture war that is currently going on; traditional values vs. progressive values. Each fanatically struggles for control of the masses. Making the American people choose from one extreme or the other without any compromise.
I have to wonder how much of the division is contrived, as it has been for years by corporate cheerleading actors posing as journalists, playing as if they are reporting news when actually, it is nothing but wealthy people’s opinion which is mostly contrary to the truth, and detrimental to the population at large. And let us not forget the appointed and elected government functionaries in their pockets, also helping to divide and conquer.
This type of over dramatization is more of a problematic viewpoint than you think. Yeah people get mad when uncomfortable truth gets said but they don't do anything when Chad is the one saying it. Also who is going to start a war with the military? Like I said over dramatization.
@@herrwahnsinn4229 You are vastly over estimating the US military actual capabilities. We could not win essentially civil wars in Korea or Vietnam. Couldn't win in Afghanistan. What makes you think they can win an American civil war. Also if civil war starts there will be mass defections weaking the force and even saboteurs staying in the ranks to create havoc and send intelligence. Will the military be a factor, absolutely without question. Can the existing weakened military beat 160 million people, its a fat chance despite the weapons and arms at their disposal. And dont get me wrong, I am not pushing this from a Dem or Republican side. It doesnt matter who is the Commander in Chief or what party he happens to be at that time. The US military alone cannot defeat half the country in theory were it to happen.
And, so many people seem to think it would be a series of pitched battles like the Civil War or even WW2. When in reality, it would be more like Vietnam or Afghanistan. American insurgents, would be some really dangerous insurgents to try and suppress. Especially those with combat experience, that we have a whole lot of right now. They know how to do it, because it was done to them during their service.
@@thomast8539 I know how it would play... liberals would rise up (as they have been for the last two years) in major cities and cause havoc, while the media calls them "peaceful protesters". If conservatives began to do the same, they would immediately be labeled "insurgents" and "domestic terrorists", and the national guard would be called out to fight against them.
This man is right ! We all need required reading of The True Believer by Eric Hoffer written 70 yrs. Ago . This book is about today's political environment.
Wealthy people and their corporations having taken political power from people may some day come to pay for the mess they have created in their quest for money and power.
One side is sexualizing children at a very young age by exposing them to drag queens. One side is giving children puberty blockers and treating them like they are part of a mad science experiment to remake gender. One side thinks children are a burden that should have been aborted in the first place. One side wants children wearing masks in school forever, like they are some disease spreading pest. One side wants children to be indoctrinated to hate their own race, culture, and history. One side is now even arguing that math is racist. One side wants children to instead learn about all things LGBTQ. One side is simply a culture of death and decay.
Um. I think the rise in general criminal adventures, violence we have and are seeing - and the fact that Dalio may be denying that here may be significant.
hes hating on guns, and peoples rights, while ignoring that. look at some of the other comments. Its coming, and its deserved. If we want our freedom, we have to earn it now.
@@lewstone5430 Much of the things he talks about are clear as day; the polarisation (caused by Republican nihilism), emergence of China (which is almost certainly unavoidable, but this does not mean that the US will just let this happen. This has happened many times throughout history, and the same mistakes are made every time, and there is no indication it will be different), wealth and income inequality (which is just insane in the US), and the decline of democracy (not just all over the world, the number of democracies have declined for 25 years straight. But take the US, in 2016 an authoritarian was elected and became president for 4 years, some much for the land of the free).
Good morning. My family came to Southern California many years ago from the South. We are people of Faith. Through hard work, we were able to enjoy great success. My brother and his family have decided to remain in California. They are able to insulate themselves by living on the coast from many of the pressures others, like me and my family, have decided to avoid. My former wife is now living in Montana. Our three daughters and I are headed to Utah and Idaho. The change will be an adjustment, no doubt. But with numerous grandchildren to consider, it appears that change is in our best interest, particularly in the long term. In casual conversation with friends, there seems to be a growing consensus that a portion of the US will someday soon secede. Nations have broken apart and formed new through out history, and I suspect it will indeed happen again here in the US. I don't think secession will lead to warfare as it did in 1860, but IMHO, a kind of self-segregation is already in the works. Thanks for reading.
I've lived in southern California my entire life. Myself and most of my family are conservative Christians. There are many other Californians like us, but we have no representation here. We vote, but our votes are cancelled by millions of illegal votes. It's sad when traveling out of state and people automatically assume we're liberals because of where we're from.
@@shaunsteele8244 Amen and Amen! A real estate agent in Lake Havasu City, Arizona asked me recently, "Are you conservative or liberal?" She was only about 25. I answered "conservative." She said, "We'll take you!!!!" I couldn't believe it. LOL. Have a nice day.
That moment is here and has been for some time. Could it lead to violence? It already HAS led to violence. We lost truth because people have become loyal to a party like they are loyal to a football team. And they don't even care what they stand for. They just want to win.
Perfect analysis. Nobody is interested in reasoned argument leading to a conclusion. There is ONLY tribalism.... It's like Northern Ireland 1969 on a grand scale... NO front lines required, just terrorism.... Reading UA-cam comments..nobody says "You are right I have changed my mind". Floating voters (persuadables) have evaporated and an un-elected, un-firable, un-appealable partisan Supreme Court is now in charge of the country ... They could confirm Compulsory Church tithing and gun ownership etc .. Easily.. They own the country now... The coup happened and was successful
👍👍👍
Just like a sports team - a political party's loyalty is a one way street.
Precisely! Confusing between loving your country and loving political parties
Top comment worthy!
America ended some time ago. It's just the name of a region now.
The American Dream is dead for my generation. I can attest to that.
@@trentp8035 You can thank the Marxist Socialist Globalists that were/are pretending to be patriots. They sold the country out.
I am a conservative and cant say I know his personal opinion, I honestly dont know if he leans Dem or Republican but he is spot on here. I think going forward neither side is going to accept losing, or follow orders from the opposing side after defeat, ultimately leading to war.
Why does your political affiliation matter in this opinion? Is that not the root of the problem?🇨🇦
@@dandylandpuffplaysminecraf8744 my point is Im Republican but his point seems neutral and his point could be from either side. Both Dems and Republicans could have an opinion like his and its true. You now have Dems upset about Roe vs Wade, alot of people oppose mandated vaccines, etc. A tipping point is going to be reached within the next ten years to trigger some form of civil war in America
@@CapeFear1 being upset about having constitutional rights taken away is not the same as staging a government overthrow.
One is a legal protest, the other is betrayal of the oath of office.
@@CapeFear1 I was a Republican for 35+ years until the insurrection. The party has to return to its fundamental roots if it wants to represent the lower and middle classes again. I would expect it to get replaced by a another party and go the way of the Whigs in the coming years.
@@CapeFear1 that’s why it’s better to build a 3rd party.
Declaration of Independence: "That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."
Amen
We change governments every 2,4, and 6 years.
I don’t want to move to a different state, I want to move to a different country. Is America even worth saving?
Ask that question to the millions of American expats that live abroad. Most are retirees, and plenty of young people, who are digital nomads. They seam happy to leave America’s toxic identity politics.
that's a good question
@@-Koyaanisqatsi- Which is why a violent conflict of any great impact is unlikely.
If only because it has the potential to be saved by adopting another view of its governing document.
I'm an expat now and feel safer living in a 3rd world country
it's going to happen, the only question is when
It's not possible. It's inevitable.
never been more fearful about the direction we are heading.
Better find something to believe in then, something to put those fears to rest.
Our rights have been so stripped away.....that fighting for Constitutional rights is considered extreme. Yup, we're close to friction.
this country is falling apart. First it will be abortion rights then gay rights then interracial marriage rights. All the things happening in this country from the inequality of certain groups to the ridiculous rulings they are pushing for are leading to civil war and i cant wait because either way first chance i get im leaving this awful country. Im bisexual and im moving to Australia to be with my boyfriend sooner or later and if civil war happens it will make leaving that much easier for me
👍👍👍
Which rights have been stripped away?
@@unusg1 first off women's rights have failed to be placed in our constitution to equal men. Second our constitution is currently being attacked by the religious right.
@@unusg1 freedom of the press, free speech, freedom of body autonomy, right to bear arms, right now new York is proposing that in order to have and or keep arms you're online activities are monitored ie red flag laws, now we know this will be open to abuse and would violate the 4th amendment.
I don't see things getting better. We are more divided than ever.
I don't think so. I go out among my community and have pleasant exchanges with everyone without knowing their political affiliation. There only appears to be division because the media says there is. It's ridiculous.
@@randallfowler9348 I agree with that. In real life people seem reasonable. It's the internet and the media that gets everybody riled up!
@@asphyxiafeeling i disagree if we are reasonable then do away with the two party system. the fact that two party have to battle show that we should be seperate country. how are we a country when all states dont practice the same right s
@@asphyxiafeeling The after 8 pm "media" on Fox who make MILLIONS stirring up FEAR and hate and giving talking points to people in easy chairs just coming off an hour of Jeopardy and Wheel OF Fortune.
@@randallfowler9348 Depends on where you live, it's the same here in Europe. In bigger cities, everything will be more like the madness you see online, while on the countryside everything is still pretty much fine.
It’s getting to the point where you can’t pick a side because neither represents your beliefs. And nobody should be surprised by anything that happens anymore. 9/11 was the last time I was surprised.
I live in Mexico and can tell you that the difference in the US and Mexico is the justice system and the rule of law which is like money , it is only worth what the populus agree upon.
Damn. 🤔
We’ll said.
Wow that’s dope that you know that
Good to see Charlie Rose again...
Charlie Rose: "Could it lead to violence?"
What is he smoking? It's already begun.
I think he's deliberately understanding it for the willfully blind and clueless. The people who already know it's here don't need to be told.
Charlie was never the brightest dude
Charlie is also part of the problem.
@@fox1actual Exactly.
Charlie is a wealthy white privileged liberal, of course he doesn't realize how dire the violence is.
Charlie rose - thank you for returning and welcome back.
he's always worth listening too. Ray Dalio
The accuracy of those predictions are spooky.
It's almost like the Founders thought of this when they made States rights
Ray speaks wise words. Most people don’t even think past A/B, this is why most people are fooled.
I think Ray was uncomfortable with his opinion. But he made sense to me! Might not be a civil war. We would face much worse. A tyrannical system of government.
More likely: an increasingly weak government, respected by nobody; therefore, anarchy.
@@riodejaneiro4793 I have several friends that are Police officers. They are not arresting people anymore because 1) George Floyd and the possibility of the officer spending the rest of their life in prison for doing their job. 2) Corrupt District Attorneys letting violent criminals off based on personal bias. Our military, police and court systems have been significantly weakened, probably on purpose. As you stated, this will lead to anarchy.
@@riodejaneiro4793 Both of such outcomes would be tyrannical, for anarchy means governance would become local, arbitrary, and still in the hands of the few: mob vs mob. And all tyrannies begin with a tyranny of fear. We're already far along that path.
Anarchy is An=without + Archo= ruler. Anarchy as philisophical theory is a valid discussion.
Tyrannies often start with not just fear, but famine. Look at the good supply chain right now. Look at global policies and hownthey are set to actually exacerbate food distribution. Yhey plan to starve us into compliance.
@@riodejaneiro4793 not the more likely scenario. What has the elites been telling us g or generations? Brave New World, 1984, and Davosman? What can we see as absolute fact in present reality? Surveillance is the opiate that the state nor the corporation can do without. No way they can NOT partake. Scientific dictatorship. That's what is emergent. Now surveillance under the skin is reality. Delivered via "vaccines"?
Welcome back Charlie! Your show has been terribly missed.
So you're good with him greeting young females seeking professional guidance, in his underwear.
@@iamhudsdent2759 I am good gaining wisdom from experiencing his interviews about the world we live in, which are unlike any others in the history of television.
Its coming and soon. Stay tuned.
Just realized Charlie was back. Happy to find it.
Glad Charlie is back!
It's great to see Charlie Rose back doing what he does best. I've been a fan of his work for many years, and I haven't forgotten the unceremonious manner in which the networks dismissed him and hoped to erase a man's entire award-winning career in the blink of an eye. It was both shameful and cowardly behavior from the very same corporations that had benefited so greatly from Charlie's unique contributions to journalism for decades prior. Those who currently sit in the chairs once occupied by Mr. Rose are not even in his league. Wishing him all the best moving forward.
Hmm, “doing what he does best”? You mean representing and promoting a leftist point of view. His PBS show was always incredibly unbalanced. His progressive, PC guests he’d coddle and give them all the time and sympathy in the world. His relatively few conservative guests, or anyone that didn’t keep to the lefty party line, he’d be incredibly aggressive and short tempered with, cutting them off, interrupting them throughout, with constant displays of sarcasm. No, not a fan. I stopped watching him years before he was canned, with only very rare exceptions if there was a guest I especially wanted to see.
@@odietamo9376 You are the type who probably believes FoxNews is fair and balanced.
Shameful? It's Rose himself and his decades of inappropriate behavior, which caused his firing. He needs to be jailed, not interviewing people.
@@lenblack1462 Haha, compared to what? CNN? MSNBC? The NYT?
@@rah62 He was fired and shamed. Went from the top, to humilation. That was also over a decade ago now. I'm sick of cancel culture. Watch something else if you hate the guy.
The rule of law is obviously important, but not blindly, and when those in power abuse the rule of law to subjugate their people, at some point Jefferson's reference to changing the government should be an option.
Rule of Law was dicarded by Gerald Ford, and it's never been the same since.
@@theodorealtmeier7199 which one?
A civil war would be more harmful than the actual war itself. Police would divide because not all views are the same, military would divide because of the same reasons, and literally everything will be split into eventually fighting against your own friends, relatives, coworkers, fellow soldiers, students etc.. We would see mass exodus of people moving to a certain half of the city/state/country like a mass migration to establish fortifications to sides. its an absolute worst case scenario for the future of America. It won’t be like the first civil war and it won’t even be comparable because of the connections we have to one another today. Everyone would lose.
The trouble makers always would rather have us fighting each other because it takes attention off of them.
Agreed.
if you think any cops would be on the Dems side, youre nuts. the Dems have slandered them in the media for multiple years now
Reluctantly, I agree that we are heading toward a civil war witj significant violence. It won't be fought with full fledged armies like in the 1860's, but with smaller groups like militias. It may be like the battles over slavery in the 1850's like in the Kansas territory.
“Bleeding Kansas”
i bet the military will join in. this war will not be fought with just militias and their AR-15s. it would be fought with all available military equipment.
You have no idea of what the future holds. None of us do. Stop pretending that you understand tea leaves and crystal balls. If violence comes, it most certainly can escalate beyond measure and quickly.
It will happen at a state level where a GOP government won't concede defeat and will try to bend the laws so a minority keeps the power. The GOP always lose the popular vote because they don't represent us. GOP don't represents WE THE PEOPLE
@@XYZ-bi9eb of course, all they'd have to do is seize a National Guard base or military installation and they have access to weapons civilians can't have like machine guns, tanks, ... nuclear weapons. Talk about the Jan 6-style wackos getting ahold of one of those places... many of them would be taking selfies yelling memes but the real militant types would be driving a nuke out to hit some "blue city" or something. They may just be let in the front door by sympathizers, God knows a lot of the sheriffs and people who do the day to day 'law enforcement' are on their side. It's pretty amazing that with a country as dumb and prone to fascistic thinking as America that this hasn't happened YET
No has the interviewing expertise of Charlie Rose. He listens to what his guests are saying. The interview is all about them allowing for viewers to learn, gain knowledge. Did not know he had a profile on YT. Glad it appeared on my homepage.
" Do you get unbiased reporting, its hard to come by " . looks directly at Rose . LOL LOL
your best example of roses bias reporting is--?
@@duanedavidson7219 No business saying anything of the sort on yt and in the US. Anyone peering into the old and esoteric, crrow for sure, and fathoms better. Are you going to tell me that Cnn or faux is better?
I’ve been a fan of charlie’s interviews for so many years I love the way he conducts interviews
Charlie, it's great to see you on UA-cam. I always dug your show on PBS. I used to watch it regularly. Thanks for comming back, on the internet.
Hopefully he’s solved his personal problems.
Brilliant man!
Principals: Life & Work
Ray Dalio
“Thoughtful disagreement, without that how can you build a culture of independent thinkers? Collective disagreement, shouldn’t it be a source of curiosity....
Someone is wrong how do you know it’s not you without thoughtful discussion”
Charlie Rose And Ray Dalio! Wow! This is historic!!!
They had another interview years ago as well.
@@tenningale We seem to see our past in the faces of famous people, and that’s why we adore them! Nay, we also seem to adore older wealthy people! Ray Dalio sounds like a good father, and his wise counsels are the wisdom of an older man.
Another important note, Ray Dalio and Charlie Rose remind us of another America long gone.
I don’t know about civil war but we are certainly going through a period civil strife.
People should start standing up to the Media and the Politicians and taek back our Rights ie. Free Speech, Freedom of Choice, Privacy..and any other Right that has been eroded by the powers that be....
glad to see you back ! keep up the good work sir
What a delight to discover Charlie is back doing what he's so brilliant at.
He's a great supporter of the global takeover by the elite and loves attending his Bilderberg meetings to discuss crushing our freedoms.
Harassing women?
I miss Charlie Rose more than anyone from those years. Charlie was wonderful- the most interesting interviews of all.
@@situated4 He was fired 12 years ago now. Paid the price for it. I'm so sick of cancel culture. The guy isn't going to win a popularity contest, but let him work at what he's so very good at. If people don't want to watch, so be it. If guests don't want to show up on this new show, they don't have to. Plenty more avenues out there for everyone.
Love Charlie Rose!
I don't see two sides moving further apart. I see one side essentially staying in the same place and the other side moving further and further away. Example: 100% of all people in the U.S. could define what a woman is 5 years ago. Now, a good chunk can't do that anymore. The same people get angry because they're called a he rather than a she, or a she rather than a they. These aren't universal issues that people are dealing with around the world. These are people in the United States who are looking for a fight and creating excuses to explain away their anger at the world and to have a reason to say they "oppressed" -- So much progress has been made in this country that people are literally having to go out and create reasons to say they're oppressed. Let that sink in. They're going to get the fight they're looking for, too. Their failed policies are causing hardships on everyone. But, do they admit it and reverse course? No, they're doubling down!
Great to see you back Charlie!
civil war == states will vote to start another nation (30 states will vote to start a new nation).
I'm so happy to see you interviewing again. Please, stay.
Boy, do I love seeing Charlie Rose again!
And this time he's clothed.
I don't know when this interview was, but it looks like we're already in a cold civil war.
have been for a few years now.
Indeed.
This guy is spot on.
"Dalio fears a kind of civil war in which the rule of law is ignored, elections are not respected and truth is lost." (description)
this is all TRUE right NOW!
the war is ON ray ...
what are the SIDES is the question?
While most people are pointing at each other on the X axis, they are failing to see the other class on the Y axis. Class warfare.
Working class VS ruling class 🥰
Red vs Blue
@@kw5961 the unfortunate part of that possibility is that its an overclass that has conjured this disunion.
Might be time to break the power grid
Great to see Charlie back as America needs intelligent conversation.
And an old man naked under his bath robe.
Really? He sexually harassed several of his female staff. No metoo exaggeration.
He’s an asshole that abused his position. Intelligent conversation is NOT dependent on him.
And America needs fresh, new #metoo tales
You are right,and Ray is right. I think that it's inevitable.We cannot continue down this road of unfairness.The divided country stuff is a joke. It is full blown war forever.
1:34
When Dalio is sheepish you know that’s going to happen!!!! Our country isn’t safe
That's why I'm strapped at all times.
Do we have somewhere this interview in full? (1 video or list)
So good to have you back, Mr. Rose, the smartest interviewer today
When he is not flashing his assistants.
Give me a break. Rose is not the most intelligent of interviewers. Bill Moyers was good.
What a great surprise to see Charlie Rose! I grew up with you and you were always the classiest and most respected journalist of your time.
He was accused of sexual misconduct or molestation or something, no? So idk man...
I am so happy to see him again , also when I was in college in the nineties I watched him every night
In the last 30 years workers' salaries have remained stagnant, and poverty has increased immensely; while at the same those who set the salaries of workers (executives) have seen their wealth increase in proportion. Just where do you think their money came from? Just how much can people be squeezed till they say, "No more!" One would like to ask Mr. Dalio: "What did YOU do to ensure that the people who worked for your company shared in the wealth of your company so that they didn't have to struggle?"
Exactly. Why are we giving audience to a big finance guy?
He's engaging and I love what he says, but when did the TRUTH become such a difficult issue? Good luck America cause you're sure as shit gunna need it. China has most certainly got your number and cunts like this guy served it up with Billy Clunton on a silver platter back in the 1990's
Check out, “The Jack Welch Effect”.
So happy to see Charlie Rose !!! and what a guest... love Dalio !!!
It's good to see Charlie! He probably is sorry
It is SOOOOO great to see you back Charlie. I used to watch your show EVERY nite!!!!!!!
My guy…literally dropping wisdom on us. And look at the current landscape lol This man along with Munger is brilliant and many fail to acknowledge his points due to his wealth. Best insights we have seen in years
Munger hahahahaha. Simp for billionaires at your own risk.
@@herrwahnsinn4229 Okay who do we simp for then? Alinity?
@@merrychase9744 NOT BILLIONAIRES for starters.
@@herrwahnsinn4229 Why?
I am completely freaking out. Will somebody tell me what is going on does he have a show where can I watch it?
It is so great to see Charlie Rose
much as you might like him as an interviewer (and I used to) he is a terrible person
@@GwaiZai Was fired, shamed, and paid a price. I'm sick of cancel culture. He's not going to win a popularity contest, but he's outstanding at interviews, and I'm glad he's now working. If someone doesn't like him, they can be interviewed by someone else. Thousands of avenues today.
thank god Charlie is back
Who's going to do the fighting? Everyone is too lazy. No one has the guts for war.
A national divorce is needed. That way each person can live in the system they want.
Been saying this for a while now. But there would be too much quabbling over real estate and assets for it ever to be obtained peacefully so war is much more likely.
I agree but conservatives must maintain control of the food and oil producing regions where we currently have massive majorites
I don't fully disagree, but issues of trade, environmental laws, water rights, etc. would be almost more combative.
SO nice to see and hear Charie Rose again. I had assumed the hysteria would bury him forevermore.
Yeah.. I JUST SEEN THIS! DUN’NO IF HE is back on tv 🤷🏻♂️? Or is this just on the net 🤔? &, LINK PLEASE? 🙏🏻. THANKS IN ADVANCE.
Jeez. It's WORSE now.
No worries!!! It'll all work out! #Trump2024!!!
Good to have you back Charlie! Too bad the rest of my comment keeps getting censored. Like punishing experts that predict V, it's sure not to solve the problem.
While I agree , my observations lead me to the conclusion that the US citizenry does not have the courage to fight each other, preferring to squeal from the sidelines until the ship demolishes itself.
You've never spent much time in the South, have you?
@@Legendary_UA bud. They have squealing and bleating like goats in the south for thirty years. I have heard it over and over. The time has come to call it out. 'Y'all full of shit, scared little bitches who are too afraid of the national guard to do anything to anyone'
When the veteran demographic is made uncomfortable enough to get off the bench (like Zees); guys who actually know how to shoot, move and communicate; it will get very interesting then.
Is Charlie Rose back? What a treat! The best interviewer ever.
I would like to see Tavis again
@@cynthianolder3557 I agree.
Hi Charlie! Welcome back. I watched your show for years. Are you going to bring the table back?
Rule of law is one of the key differentiating factors of the great USA. If that is substantially diminished, then I am not sure what the rest of the world is going to be.
The rest of the world will be dancing on the grave of the global war mongerer.
At this point, the rule of law has been eroded in a tit-for-tat fashion and we are witnessing the breakup of our country into 2 countries. One side argued that the election was illegitimate (hacked by a foreign country) and then acted surprised when the other side refused to accept the election results. One side rioted and committed numerous acts of violence in various cities over an entire summer and then acted surprised when the other side rioted and went crazy for a few hours in one location. We may never see a presidential election conceded ever again. Both sides are now willing to resort to violence to get their way. We now live in a country where 2 sides want completely different laws, governments, and leaders.
The US is not the center of the universe sir.
Ahem! Check TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL to see where your "great" USA is placed compared to countries like New Zealand, Finland, etc.
Proportionaly, inequality always remains the same throughout the history. No matter under which world order people live, or which political system comunities rely on, or wich economic system everybody agrees on. The trend shows that nothing gonna shange much in the future no matter how future would look like, and that is just sad.
Wait till this guy discovers the Gini coefficient
@@tobyhoward122 actually Gini coef is what my assumption relies on. 😅
One of Last men speaking data based logic in the us
the name says it all... the united STATES of america, meaning that at any given point in history some states will rebel against any federal law and order and state their own rules, and that's why if one travels from texas to new jersey one can barely thinks that one is in any sort of unified country, like , lets say, france or germany
Charlie is the best man to get at the naked truth.
Ray looks young and vibrant. Good. We need him.
Yes. I think we are starting down that road where governors and senators are rebelling against Federal Law. It could go 2 ways, the US can get even more and more strict with civil disobedience, or we could eventually become separate countries with some degree of common participation, at least economically.
I'm for the latter. I personally don't want to live in a christian nationalist society but if thats what the folks in red states want--let them have it. I think they will have some tough lessons to learn while on their own and I doubt very seriously that they will be any less angry, they will just find a new scapegoat. You gotta wonder what the Population break down will look like in a red state country. My guess is it will be 75-80% male and 90% White for awhile and then it will be 100% white after their next civil war. I truly hope they secede even though it's almost impossible and a very messy process.
@@SeattleMartin True, I just think the differences will be far more drastic. People have been moving to where the regions best support their politics since early 2000. Now it will be like escaping a highly intolerant situation just so you can live a remotely normal life. How many Married Gay couples will stick around in TX if the state stops observing their Status? Worse yet, what happens to those same people with a far more emboldened far right/fascist militia goes around harassing or brutalizing those that do not fit their version of Patriot? Then its more like Refugees fleeing hostile states! It will probably not only be militias but actual state agencies. Fun times ahead. I wont spend a dime in or visit the Christian Nationalist territories any longer!
@Jeremy Serwer
Your comment is so ironic. Do you have any idea how many people have ‘fled’ to Texas from blue states in the last 2-3 years? We can’t keep them away! If some leave to have their marriages recognized by a state and to get abortions good!
@@rebeccajohnson3402 So the bigger thing to pay attention to is; you are a bigot if you're totally OK with Gay Marriage being outlawed and you're a misogynist for not wanting Women to have control of their own bodies, right?
We had 5 million idiots vote for trump in CA so I'm guessing you got a fair number of them as they're just as intolerant as you are and they get scared of different lifestyles than their christian nationalist way of life. I'm so glad they left, far less chance of one of them losing their mind and shooting up an event that they cannot tolerate. Enjoy living like its the 1870's again. You'll be so happy when the TX GQP outlaws voting for POC again!
@@cactusjackNV Most christians are not Vehemently Anti Choice, mostly its just the Evangenitals and Catholics. Most other religions are not hung up on Abortion and probably 60% of US christians want some form of Abortion to be available. Same Goes for marriage Equality and definitely free access to contraception. My issue is with that group that represents about 35-37% of the US that think they should be the shot callers on Morality for the whole of us. That is sheer insanity, no thanks we are not under some Christian Nationalist rule and we should be doing everything to assure that does not happen--so this SCOTUS situation needs to be expanded to water down the Christian Fascist elements -- its just not who we are as a country at all!
Great to see you again Charlie!
Truth is not one side or the other but is the context that fosters both sides.
Glad that I stumbled onto Charlie Rose on UA-cam. Yay! I miss watching you on tv, especially your interview program on PBS. I have felt that we are in some kind of psychological warfare situation currently. Civil war, unfortunately is not that far off in my opinion. I hope not, but we have become quite divided on some key issues, and no one is showing signs of backing down. I've had to train myself not to talk politics, as I don't want to get punched out. Some people get very angry, very fast, in this current political climate.
It's a culture war that is currently going on; traditional values vs. progressive values. Each fanatically struggles for control of the masses. Making the American people choose from one extreme or the other without any compromise.
You are correct. I have to remind myself constantly not to talk polotics.
I have to wonder how much of the division is contrived, as it has been for years by corporate cheerleading actors posing as journalists, playing as if they are reporting news when actually, it is nothing but wealthy people’s opinion which is mostly contrary to the truth, and detrimental to the population at large. And let us not forget the appointed and elected government functionaries in their pockets, also helping to divide and conquer.
This type of over dramatization is more of a problematic viewpoint than you think. Yeah people get mad when uncomfortable truth gets said but they don't do anything when Chad is the one saying it. Also who is going to start a war with the military? Like I said over dramatization.
@@herrwahnsinn4229 You are vastly over estimating the US military actual capabilities. We could not win essentially civil wars in Korea or Vietnam. Couldn't win in Afghanistan. What makes you think they can win an American civil war. Also if civil war starts there will be mass defections weaking the force and even saboteurs staying in the ranks to create havoc and send intelligence. Will the military be a factor, absolutely without question. Can the existing weakened military beat 160 million people, its a fat chance despite the weapons and arms at their disposal. And dont get me wrong, I am not pushing this from a Dem or Republican side. It doesnt matter who is the Commander in Chief or what party he happens to be at that time. The US military alone cannot defeat half the country in theory were it to happen.
And, so many people seem to think it would be a series of pitched battles like the Civil War or even WW2. When in reality, it would be more like Vietnam or Afghanistan. American insurgents, would be some really dangerous insurgents to try and suppress. Especially those with combat experience, that we have a whole lot of right now. They know how to do it, because it was done to them during their service.
You have no idea how things may play out if violence becomes the only remaining option. No one does.
@@thomast8539 I know how it would play... liberals would rise up (as they have been for the last two years) in major cities and cause havoc, while the media calls them "peaceful protesters". If conservatives began to do the same, they would immediately be labeled "insurgents" and "domestic terrorists", and the national guard would be called out to fight against them.
This man is right ! We all need required reading of The True Believer by Eric Hoffer written 70 yrs. Ago . This book is about today's political environment.
Is Charlie back on the air? This would be interesting. Have a great day.
So glad to see back Charlie. Best interviewer ever!!!
Agreed..
And clothed.
But now he has no staff to play grab-a$$ with!
12.12.2022.
The Mayan's prediction was off by ten years.
Cool. Charlie Rose, I'm interested.
I say bring it on. The sooner, the better.
Wealthy people and their corporations having taken political power from people may some day come to pay for the mess they have created in their quest for money and power.
Good to see Charlie Rose doing his one on one conversations again. He is so gifted at that.
New subscriber here.
Is the full interview available
Call it what you want, we can't (and shouldn't) continue this way.
What is necessary, is necessary.
How many genders are there? One side says two. The other side says dozens. If we can no longer agree on things as basic as this what can we agree on?
One side is sexualizing children at a very young age by exposing them to drag queens. One side is giving children puberty blockers and treating them like they are part of a mad science experiment to remake gender. One side thinks children are a burden that should have been aborted in the first place. One side wants children wearing masks in school forever, like they are some disease spreading pest. One side wants children to be indoctrinated to hate their own race, culture, and history. One side is now even arguing that math is racist. One side wants children to instead learn about all things LGBTQ. One side is simply a culture of death and decay.
I’m so happy to hear great man as Charlie Rose again .
yes, glad he's wearing some clothes too...
@@gordonriley5277 Whatever makes you feel safe and morally omniscient.
Any chance he'll have Matt Lauer on as a guest? 🤣
The *GREAT Charlie Rose! I have MISSED his show and now it's HERE!
THANKS *Charlie
Um. I think the rise in general criminal adventures, violence we have and are seeing - and the fact that Dalio may be denying that here may be significant.
hes hating on guns, and peoples rights, while ignoring that.
look at some of the other comments.
Its coming, and its deserved. If we want our freedom, we have to earn it now.
Ray is really an outlier when it comes to political views as a hedge fund manager, and rightfully so.
The question is how do we make money off a civil war in America?
@Out Side There are more guns in the US than people, what are you nagging about?
@@Twitch760 Ray would say, invest in the rising world power... China.
So Ray is just a rich guy? No wonder he sounds ridiculous and out-of-touch.
@@lewstone5430 Much of the things he talks about are clear as day; the polarisation (caused by Republican nihilism), emergence of China (which is almost certainly unavoidable, but this does not mean that the US will just let this happen. This has happened many times throughout history, and the same mistakes are made every time, and there is no indication it will be different), wealth and income inequality (which is just insane in the US), and the decline of democracy (not just all over the world, the number of democracies have declined for 25 years straight. But take the US, in 2016 an authoritarian was elected and became president for 4 years, some much for the land of the free).
Evil laws should be Opposed , IMHO .
Thank God for more Charlie Rose!
I think he's 100% correct in his observations.
Good morning. My family came to Southern California many years ago from the South. We are people of Faith. Through hard work, we were able to enjoy great success. My brother and his family have decided to remain in California. They are able to insulate themselves by living on the coast from many of the pressures others, like me and my family, have decided to avoid. My former wife is now living in Montana. Our three daughters and I are headed to Utah and Idaho. The change will be an adjustment, no doubt. But with numerous grandchildren to consider, it appears that change is in our best interest, particularly in the long term. In casual conversation with friends, there seems to be a growing consensus that a portion of the US will someday soon secede. Nations have broken apart and formed new through out history, and I suspect it will indeed happen again here in the US. I don't think secession will lead to warfare as it did in 1860, but IMHO, a kind of self-segregation is already in the works. Thanks for reading.
I've lived in southern California my entire life. Myself and most of my family are conservative Christians. There are many other Californians like us, but we have no representation here. We vote, but our votes are cancelled by millions of illegal votes. It's sad when traveling out of state and people automatically assume we're liberals because of where we're from.
@@shaunsteele8244 Amen and Amen! A real estate agent in Lake Havasu City, Arizona asked me recently, "Are you conservative or liberal?" She was only about 25. I answered "conservative." She said, "We'll take you!!!!" I couldn't believe it. LOL. Have a nice day.
@@shaunsteele8244 Oh, please. There are not millions of illegal votes.
We are here.
what cant we see what Ray portfolio is holding like we do with k1 on buffet BRK's fund?
Charlie Rose is the best interviewer I've ever seen. What unfolded was a set up beyond disgusting, I've been there.