Google Chat was enough to make the gears turn for the sales team I worked with. We just organically began using it, contemplated switching to slack or teams and decided we were fine with what we had. We are a simple folk.
People really obsess about this comparison between subscriber number and view number. Why isn't it a cause for celebration that UA-cam presented your video to so many people who clicked on it? Anyway, it's such an alienating chart to push under your viewers' noses. Do you really think it makes new people disposed to subscribe?
It's not selling the sizzle to your viewer. I just joined, never been here and the beginning is slogging through that chart. I agree. That is an internal chart that a viewer has 0 cares about. I'm more likely to subscribe if you just say, "Hey, if you like this content please hit subscribe so youtube knows to help my channel grow" or something along those lines. I do care. However, I do not care about subs to views ratios at all. Can't even relate to those metrics as a viewer.
Thanks for the comment. The problem is that talking a little about the analytics really works. Just asking people to subscribe we've tried. It doesn't work. But I will change it up a bit and try out different things occasionally.
In the rapidly evolving business landscape, companies that fail to adapt to new security trends and improve human lives often find themselves falling behind. This has led to a pattern where less innovative companies resort to litigation against their more progressive and inventive counterparts. This trend is not new and can be observed with industry leaders like Microsoft, Tesla, and OpenAI, which have all faced lawsuits. Conversely, companies that are perceived as non-innovative and potentially deceptive tend to start this, as cry-baby whiners. Just look at who the "complainers" are.
@@ThisWeekinIT :No, they did not, and that is beside the point. No one is preventing or hindering any company from using Slack or Teams. The choice is yours. It's also permissible to favor one brand over another. However, the notion of "That company is succeeding and innovating, and since I can't capture the market, I'll sue them" is nonsensical.
Thanks for watching! Do you prefer Microsoft Teams or Slack? Let me know in the comments below.
Google Chat was enough to make the gears turn for the sales team I worked with. We just organically began using it, contemplated switching to slack or teams and decided we were fine with what we had. We are a simple folk.
Were you also using other Google services like Google Drive and G Suite apps?
Yeah, kinda.. though everyone also had MS Office too.
@@ThisWeekinIT
People really obsess about this comparison between subscriber number and view number. Why isn't it a cause for celebration that UA-cam presented your video to so many people who clicked on it? Anyway, it's such an alienating chart to push under your viewers' noses. Do you really think it makes new people disposed to subscribe?
It's not selling the sizzle to your viewer. I just joined, never been here and the beginning is slogging through that chart. I agree.
That is an internal chart that a viewer has 0 cares about.
I'm more likely to subscribe if you just say, "Hey, if you like this content please hit subscribe so youtube knows to help my channel grow" or something along those lines. I do care.
However, I do not care about subs to views ratios at all. Can't even relate to those metrics as a viewer.
Thanks for the comment. The problem is that talking a little about the analytics really works. Just asking people to subscribe we've tried. It doesn't work. But I will change it up a bit and try out different things occasionally.
icic, well you would know more about it than me, I'm just going off my feelings. I am only 1 vote.@@ThisWeekinIT
In the rapidly evolving business landscape, companies that fail to adapt to new security trends and improve human lives often find themselves falling behind. This has led to a pattern where less innovative companies resort to litigation against their more progressive and inventive counterparts. This trend is not new and can be observed with industry leaders like Microsoft, Tesla, and OpenAI, which have all faced lawsuits. Conversely, companies that are perceived as non-innovative and potentially deceptive tend to start this, as cry-baby whiners. Just look at who the "complainers" are.
Although you could argue that Microsoft copied Slack and created Teams.
@@ThisWeekinIT :No, they did not, and that is beside the point. No one is preventing or hindering any company from using Slack or Teams. The choice is yours. It's also permissible to favor one brand over another. However, the notion of "That company is succeeding and innovating, and since I can't capture the market, I'll sue them" is nonsensical.
so we're paying more because slack sucks
Personally, I have never liked Slack. So, I'd pay more too.