Feminism vs. High Status of Women in Islam by Dr. Suzy Ismail | ICNA-MAS Convention 2018
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 лис 2018
- Register for Next Convention at www.icnaconvention.org/register
For all ICNA-MAS Convention (2018), please visit • 2018 ICNA-MAS Convention
The ICNA-MAS annual convention is one of the largest gatherings of American Muslims in the U.S. This is the forth consecutive year it has been held in Baltimore. It was attended by over 22,000 Muslims. It featured many top scholars and activists, in addition to many special events like 1000 Meals Distribution in Downtown Baltimore, 750 Mercy Bags distribution to senior homes and Street dawah at Inner Harbor.
For more information:
Facebook: / icna
Twitter: / icna
UA-cam: / icnatv
Website: www.icna.org
Phone: 718-658-1199
Donate at www.icna.org/donation/
Volunteer at www.icna.org/joinus/
The best of you are those who are best to their women ( prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) )
*women Yes :)
@@Diamondraw4Real Thank you.. I have corrected it😊
Dr Suzy is my favorite female lecturer. May Allah grant all of your heart desires and bless you on hearth and in the hereafter. Amin
I love these videos !!
Walekum Assalam Wa rahmatullahi Wa barakatuh ,
Jazak Allah Khair sister Dr Suzy Ismail,
May Allah bless you with good health, long life, all happiness and success in this world and Aakhirah too Aameen 🤲🤲🤲
masha Allah.. i really admire ur knowledge and wisdom dr suzy! may Allah bless u and ur family..
Did you know that the world index for abuse against woman scores the predominantly Islamic countries the highest for abuse?!!!!
Wonderful thanks 🙏 SOOOOOOO. Much.
JAK
🙏💕👍
So deep masha Allah
amazing
Beautiful powerful talk MashAllah!
Amazing.Sister
'ASALAM ' IS THE PERFECTION AND PEACE
Masha Allah
Subhanallah what a speech mashallah
Nice
Unique
As salamu alaykum dr. Suzi.
Masya Allah masya Allah Beautiful
❤
Perpect islami programme.Congreats my respectable sister.
I felt like she's pouring honey into my year. I remembered us the true valur and meaning of feminism. We're actually living in a peculiar earth now. There r few women who's act actually misinterpret the meaning of feminism. But she reminded us our duty or the work in her religious way. ❤️
True femininism is anti religion anti marriage anti traditions anti family and pro abortion everything islam is against
Feminism is misandriy ,pro abortion, anti family anti religion anti tradition anti marriage
sahih al-bukhari 304
The women asked, "O allah's messenger! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?" He said, "Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?" They replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn't it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?" The women replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her religion."
Charles Darwin in The Descent of Man(1871), vol. 2, pp. 328-329: 'the chief distinction in the intellectual powers of the two sexes is shown by men attaining to a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than women can attain -whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. Thus man has ultimately become superior to woman. It is, indeed, fortunate that the law of the equal transmission of characters to both sexes has commonly prevailed throughout the whole class of mammals; otherwise it is probable that man would have become as superior in mental endowment to women, as the peacock is in ornamental plumage to the peahen. Adult females of most species resembles the young of both sexes and males are more evolutionarily advanced than females. Due to the female's smaller brains, they were eternally primitive, childlike, less spiritual, more materialistic, and a real danger to the contemporary civilization.'
Darwinist evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould's The Mismeasure of Man, p. 104-105: 'large number of women whose brain are closer in size to those of gorillas than to the most developed male brains. This inferiority is so obvious that no one can contest it for a moment; only its degree is worth discussion.'
@@ytv31 What is the relevance of a book from 1871?
@@JK_JK_JK oh the desperation for self validation by 'liking' one's one nonsense 😂
@@ytv31 oh the desperation for self validation by quoting nonsense from 1871 😂
💢 Unlike the Quran, The Bible was written over a period of roughly 2,000 years by 40 different authors from three continents, who wrote in three different languages. These facts alone make the Bible one of a kind, but there are many more amazing details that defy natural explanation.
💢 Shepherds, kings, scholars, fishermen, prophets, a military general, a cupbearer, and a priest all penned portions of Scripture. They had different immediate purposes for writing, whether recording history, giving spiritual and moral instruction, or pronouncing judgment. They composed their works from palaces, prisons, the wilderness, and places of exile while writing history, laws, poetry, prophecy, and proverbs. In the process they laid bare their personal emotions, expressing anger, frustration, joy, and love.
Yet despite this marvelous array of topics and goals, the Bible displays a flawless internal consistency. It never contradicts itself or its common theme.
From Genesis to Revelation, we see man’s repeated rebellion against his holy Creator. God made a perfect world, but mankind has continually rejected His authority and sought to decide truth for himself. Nevertheless, God promised to extend His love, grace, and mercy to unworthy people who deserved to be cast into the lake of fire for all eternity.
Early in Genesis after Adam and Eve sinned, God made known His plan of redemption, which He repeatedly promised and expanded upon throughout the Old Testament. The promises were fulfilled in a surprising but predicted way: by the Savior’s sacrificial death and subsequent resurrection, as recorded in the New Testament. The Bible then announced the future culmination of the Savior’s redemptive work in Revelation.💢
Yea its been corrupted changed and not well preserved and does have many contradictions in it and inconsistencies in it making it a flawed book
In short We are celebrating woman day because of some bad accidents. So celebrating woman day could bring good result worldwide.
2: second thing as I heard (could be wrong) man and woman's are equal Hhh hhhh wahhh
Feminism is contrary to Islam in many ways..So here is another argument:
1. One cannot be committed to Feminism without accepting the Patriarchal Thesis, i.e., the thesis that there exists a social structure perpetuated by men designed to subjugate and oppress women that has existed since the dawn of civilization.
2. The Patriarchal Thesis is anathema to Islam.
3. Therefore, Feminism is anathema to Islam.
Why is the Patriarchal Thesis (PT) so noxious as far as Islam is concerned?
First of all, PT undermines the very notion of nubuwwa. All anbiya were men (yes, yes, I know Ibn Hazm and a couple of other scholars said some women also received wahy, but nonetheless, the vast majority of prophets were men). Were all these anbiya part of the patriarchal structure used to dominate women?
PT also undermines the scholarly tradition. The vast majority of ulama in our tradition were men, and the most influential and prolific of them were men. And all of them, literally all of them, espoused a plethora of views that modern feminists consider toxic masculine misogynist drivel of the worst kind. Were all these men part of the patriarchal system used to oppress women?
PT undermines Islamic theology itself. If the patriarchy is this entrenched, destructive force plaguing humanity and inflicting so much pain and suffering, why doesn't the Qur'an address it? Why didn't the Prophet s address it? Can the Qur'an and Sunna be considered complete guidance when they do not call out this systematic oppression? Feminists maintain that patriarchy is among the greatest forces of evil in all human history, yet there is not even a word for it in Arabic. Not a single verse or hadith dedicated to sounding the alarm bells, warning humanity of this terrible oppression. Why?
These are the logical considerations feminists make with respect to Islam and that is why Muslim feminists go through phases of disillusion with Islam and many end up leaving. They start by throwing the scholars of our tradition under the bus for having "evil" patriarchal views of women. Then they graduate to attacking the prophets (remember Amina "deadbeat" Wadud?). Then they graduate to criticizing the Quran. Why did Allah use masculine pronouns to refer to Himself? Why did Allah create Adam, a man, first? Why did Allah reveal verse 4:34? etc.
The is the inherent theological tension created by the Patriarchal Thesis. And it leads many Muslim feminists to adopt increasingly deviant views and even apostatize.
So those who want to claim that Feminism and Islam are compatible, confront the 1-2-3 argument above. You have limited options. I'll make it easy and lay it out:
1. You can either argue that one CAN be a feminist and NOT accept PT, i.e., the idea of ever-present patriarchy subjugating women since time immemorial.
2. Or you can argue that PT does not undermine Islam.
Which one is it?
Those who are fine with throwing the male-dominated scholarly tradition under the bus (the "reform," "progressive" type as well as "Quranists," et al.) will take option 2. But normal Muslims with correct aqida recognize that without the male-dominated scholarly tradition, the Quran would not have reached us, the Sunna would not have reached us, Islam wouldn't have been preserved, etc. If you throw the ulama out, you throw Islam out. The scholars are the inheritors of the prophets. Anyone who wants to claim that the scholars were systematically biased on a global scale and unjust against women is undermining the morality of the ulama and is therefore undermining Islam itself.
In any case, I maintain that this is a logical assessment. Those who disagree are free to provide logical rebuttals. Spare me the emotional appeals, ad hominem whining, and white knight histrionics.
NB: Let me provide some disambiguation. Of course, the patriarchy does exist. Islam is a patriarchal religion in the anthropological sense. According to Islamic Law, lineage is patrilineal and social and family structures have authority flowing through the patriarch and other males figures. But patriarchy in the Feminist sense is different in that it ascribes maliciousness to these structures. The Feminist claim is that these patriarchal institutions are designed by men with the evil intention to frustrate the interests of women for the benefit of men. In other words, an evil cabal of men are perpetually conspiring to sabotage poor, innocent, naive women at every turn and the brave feminists have discovered this dastardly plot only in the past few decades and are fighting the good fight to abolish it. Yeah, it sounds crazy because it is.
Salam aleikum, i liked how you explained all these in your comment. Can you recommend me some books about feminism&islam? I dont want to give up on my faith in order to chase an ideology. But i do want to have an accurate viewpoint on that issue. Thank you beforehand.
feminism was very bigoted and isulted foriegn women to justify colonization, now its neo colonialism of bankers, and tell women to work to pay taxes to illegal banks who they aren't to work for and if not they go to jail or get shot, for their human right of working for themselves. this is the corrupt elitist idea of feminism. it has that history in reality, Islam is against that lie of feminism going from foreign colonialism taking your material to banker's one taking your income!
Again like I said femininism is pro abortion anti marriage anti religion misandrustic anti family anti men anti masculine pro feminine
@@thatgirlinthesouth stop being femininist or ur not Muslim
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 ur right brother
Women veriy goot goot