First of all greetings and I appreciate your great content!! Since last year I’ve been immersing into the CSB translation thanks to its Day by Day Chronological Bible. In my opinion the translation nailed it by balancing between literal and dynamic. Lately I’ve been considering getting a premium bible. I wanted to make sure first that because of the investment, it has to be one that I’ll be using on a regular basis. These two complement each other well. For me at least for the money, features and portability, definitely I’m going with the verse by verse reference one. I got several study and reference bibles and the cross references are for me a must. Plus their placement at the bottom helps in my opinion with distractions and focusing on the text. And the brown goatskin one is certainly beautiful. Blessings to you and yours!! Keep up the great work!!😊😊
Thanks for the detailed comparo, brother. I have the holy land premium, it is a fantastic CSB bible for reading at home. Very engaging presentation with a 9pt font size dual column.
I don't own a CSB, but I'm reading through a borrowed premium rebind right now (and just finished 1 Samuel, so it tickled me that it was your display choice for this video!). I'm thinking the CSB is now in my top three, and I may well get my own when I'm finished with this one. That single-column layout really appeals to me. I think I'd like a floppier cover in my hand; the borrowed rebind I'm reading is my first premium experience, and I'm definitely having that experience of reading longer at each session because the book feels so good in my hands.
Great comparison. It was just what I was looking for. I'd say the single-column format looks pretty great on some Bibles, but I think I prefer the verse-by-verse format.
Cool review, Tim! Both are nice Bibles, but I would choose the single column. I really like the single column format, and it looks like it has more room to take notes.
I have the VBV and it is an incredible Bible. I really LOVE the layout. I personally am not a single column guy. I find my eyes don’t track well across the entire page. Thanks for the comparison.
Hi. I have always been a fan of the double column with center references. But somehow this single column paragraph Bible makes me want to try it... good review. Thanks
I own both bibles. Purchased the vbv first and was disappointed that the font size wasn’t a tad bit bigger. I agree with Tim: there’s a noticeable difference in font size (maybe the scwm is a tad bit bolder font as well?) when comparing each side by side. Tim, can I pose an idea for a future theme video (unless already addressed)? I have struggled most my life with reading and comprehension (I am a pastor; hold a Masters degree; was officially diagnosed as an adult with adhd). I don’t want to bring attention to myself, but there’s been no lack of the Spirit or effort on my behalf to daily study Scriptures as every believer should, without still struggling daily for years to focus and retain God’s word. I’ve used audio Bible in parallel with my reading approach at times and notice that’s an improvement. But I wonder how many of your viewers struggle with this with which no modern translation will cure - simply because it reads on a lower grade level than other formal equivalent translations? I’m simply stating this because reading comprehension isn’t an IQ issue or simply because they’re unsaved, exclusively. I have finally determined that single column bibles, this Holman one being “The one” are superior for reading retention! I’m glad they included translator references, concordance, and great maps instead of rendering it as a minimalist print. Honestly, I’ve never given single column bibles a “chance” over the years because I’ve always felt they were limited in approach and I was “missing” something, such as robust cross references, maps, or were smaller font print, or printed on thinner paper, etc. But having read the huma Holman scwm, with no desire of adding personal notes - to keep the distraction free appeal intact - I believe it could be a real gift to anyone needing greater focus in their devotional reading time. Sure, some do a great job of adding their personal notes, marks, etc which has great value and why the wide margin should be celebrated, however, there is great value in leading pages unmarked for retention reading, in my opinion. I believe this wide margin, without my cluttering it up, ongoing, provides the best distraction free Bible reading approach I’ve ever experienced - hands down! Just want to mention this in the event there are other readers not considering certain factors in their pursuit of bible purchases. Does single column formatting offer adhd, distracted readers (when coupled with the excellent and opaque paper + outstanding bold and line matched print) a superior tool? I believe it’s worth a video segment to help many who may not have given thought to certain advantages! Love your channel. God bless!
I recently got the CSB ancient faith study Bible and have always preferred NKJV, but I can’t put my CSB down. I love how translation bolds OT quotes in NT and translation is really good if you have a good background on scripture. I do prefer single column for preaching over verse by verse so if I choose one it would depend on what I use it for so I will go for single column since I have the scientific faith verse by verse
I have the CSB single column verse by verse wide margin and it is currently my favorite. I like that it is not too thick or heavy but still good margins for more taking.
I’m going to preorder the new vbv. I tried vbv layout for preaching on my iPad the other day and it was a revelation (although the verses were also spaced). I do like that the poetry isn’t versified, also. I find that can really interfere with reading. Nice comparison, thanks.
Fantastic review - really helpful, thanks! If I were buying mostly for note taking, that narrower inner gutter on the vbv would be a deal breaker... (At least it looks narrower in the video...??) It looks like there's no real space for notes on the inner column. The SC looks better for reading too, IMHO, because of its darker font and no references - it looks so clean... But if someone were going to use one for preaching, I could see the vbv would be a better bet... Do you know if the leathersoft editions use the same paper???
Did you buy the vbv? I've been wondering about the inner margin also. It doesn't look like it would be enough room to write in. But I like that it's a reference Bible!
Great review Tim; I love the side-by-side reviews! I would most definitely purchase the single margin version. I prefer a single column over a two column Bible. I find them much easier to read! I have a brand new CSB 2 column Bible that I have never used. I love the 13 point font, but they put the cross references at the end of paragraph, in a lighter, smaller font in black. I find it some what annoying, and that they should have put the references in red. If there is more than one reference for a verse, they put them at the bottom of the page. Anyway, I would much prefer the single column you reviewed. I’m going to send this to Cat to gift to someone that is in need of finding the Lord! 💖 ✝️
I would pick the verse by verse all day long and twice on Sunday!! I do not like single column in general. But also love how the verse numbers are a different color. This is a great thing for preaching!
I think, if I had to choose only one of these, it would be the SCWM. I love the layout, font size and overall look of the Bible. That being said, I have both and would not want to give up either of them. As far as the translation, I have truly become a fan of the CSB. I have used the NRSV for 30 years. I think I found a translation that I would actually put the NRSV in the number 2 slot in my tops 5 for. I tis just readable and it flows. It is like they took the best of the NRSV (Accuracy) and the NIV (Readability) and mixed them together. I am just a fan! Anyway, thanks for the review.
Hey Tim, I recently picked up a synoptic Gospels parallel Bible. This is the NRSV. I was curious as to the nuances between the Gospel writers. For example, in Mark’s Gospel, The Holy Spirit drove Jesus out to the wilderness to be tempted. In Matthew and Luke, he is led by the Spirit. In Mark, the heavens are torn open at his baptism. My pastors talk about these, so this parallel Bible (with footnotes to Greek manuscripts) is very helpful. Stay awesome, Mike- Gospel Parallels: A Comparison of the Synoptic Gospels, New Revised Standard Version Hardcover - November 30, 1992
So I have both and have preached from both. I typically do expository preaching so you'd think a verse by verse would be the one but I can't lie - the SCWM has replaced my previous preaching Bible and it'll take something impressive from Holman to make me change again.
Two years ago I didn't even know or realize there were so many different layouts of the bible like double-column or single-column or verse-by-verse and now I know I prefer verse-by-verse when doing in-depth studying or following along at church. And for regular reading, for me, there is a preference for double-column vs. single-column depending on the layout of the single-column. If there are wide margins and the single column doesn't fill the page to the borders and it's easy to follow each line then it's really about the layout for reading. And my eyes demand 8 point font or larger. So it's really about what you'll use the bible for mainly. I never knew there were so many layouts for the bible until I started collecting and using them for various tasks. So that's really the deciding factor for me. What was the question again?
If considering a premium CSB you would choose one of these over a Schuyler Quentel? 🤔 Between the two of these, I think I’m leaning a bit to the VBV but it’s close!
@@majorlovelace3859 it’s 28 GSM but that’s a fair point. I wouldn’t be writing in the Quentel, whereas these two options are clearly meant for some form of note-taking. IMO the Schuyler is more premium, but if you are primarily looking to write in your Bible then these two options seem to be the best available for the CSB translation.
Hey Colby! I still think the Schuyler CSB Quentel is the most premium CSB available… their quality and consistency is really in matched. But I do like these Holman text blocks a lot, and the wide margins give it a bit of a different feel. Great Bibles for the price.
So I messed up and ordered a single column wide margin without really thinking things through. Maybe I'll learn to enjoy it, but I find 2 coulmn Bibles much easier to read.
Too bad there isn't a premium CSB personal size single column available. I got the Wide Margin, it's amazing, but kind of big for hauling around or even hand held reading on my couch. The text setting is a perfect reader though. Shrink the wide margin single column a bit to 9.5-10 (from 10.5), 28GSM premium paper, and trim the margins a bit and you have an amazing CSB reader.
I suppose for this type of Bible I’d go with the verse by verse - I think I would want a wide margin to be more of a study tool, so the cross references would be helpful - that is if I used wide margin Bibles… really, chop those margins off the paragraph one and it looks something I would want to buy.
It’s almost a toss up. I’m a fan of verse by verse though. I have not had any single column bibles though. Maybe I’d get a less expensive one and try it out.
The CSB verse-by-verse would be the perfect layout, in my opinion, if they would make the Bible a touch wider so the inner margin could be as wide as the outer. Essentially, combine it with the cross way wide margins.
I have an old NIV84 wide margin from Cambridge and it has wide margins all around the text. The size of the Bible is 10x7 so it's bigger than these. I am not finding any wide margin that I like. I'll probably just get this one rebound!
I LOVE my CSB Bible!! I love the verse-by-verse format, especially as I do in-depth Bible study. Thanks again for this amazing gift! ❤️
Love you, Mom! Thanks for letting me borrow it.
And one more thing I really like is the NT verses that are OT references are bold. That really helps!
Absolutely. Love that.
First of all greetings and I appreciate your great content!! Since last year I’ve been immersing into the CSB translation thanks to its Day by Day Chronological Bible. In my opinion the translation nailed it by balancing between literal and dynamic. Lately I’ve been considering getting a premium bible. I wanted to make sure first that because of the investment, it has to be one that I’ll be using on a regular basis. These two complement each other well. For me at least for the money, features and portability, definitely I’m going with the verse by verse reference one. I got several study and reference bibles and the cross references are for me a must. Plus their placement at the bottom helps in my opinion with distractions and focusing on the text. And the brown goatskin one is certainly beautiful. Blessings to you and yours!! Keep up the great work!!😊😊
Thanks so much!!
I just ordered the single column. Thanks for the reviews
You’re welcome!!
Hard to pick, but I appreciate your video very much. Thank you!
My pleasure!
Thanks for the detailed comparo, brother. I have the holy land premium, it is a fantastic CSB bible for reading at home. Very engaging presentation with a 9pt font size dual column.
Love that Bible!!
Hi Tim! I guess I should've checked your videos before I asked in the other video if you've done a comparison! Thanks very much for your videos! :)
👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
I don't own a CSB, but I'm reading through a borrowed premium rebind right now (and just finished 1 Samuel, so it tickled me that it was your display choice for this video!). I'm thinking the CSB is now in my top three, and I may well get my own when I'm finished with this one.
That single-column layout really appeals to me. I think I'd like a floppier cover in my hand; the borrowed rebind I'm reading is my first premium experience, and I'm definitely having that experience of reading longer at each session because the book feels so good in my hands.
Who did the rebind?!
@@timwildsmith Post Tenebras Lux
@@LaLa_ArtGal One of the best… I’ve held one in my hands and it was incredible!
Great comparison. It was just what I was looking for.
I'd say the single-column format looks pretty great on some Bibles, but I think I prefer the verse-by-verse format.
Glad you liked it!
Cool review, Tim! Both are nice Bibles, but I would choose the single column. I really like the single column format, and it looks like it has more room to take notes.
Good choice!
I have the VBV and it is an incredible Bible. I really LOVE the layout. I personally am not a single column guy. I find my eyes don’t track well across the entire page. Thanks for the comparison.
You bet!
Hi. I have always been a fan of the double column with center references. But somehow this single column paragraph Bible makes me want to try it... good review. Thanks
Thanks for sharing!
I own both bibles. Purchased the vbv first and was disappointed that the font size wasn’t a tad bit bigger. I agree with Tim: there’s a noticeable difference in font size (maybe the scwm is a tad bit bolder font as well?) when comparing each side by side. Tim, can I pose an idea for a future theme video (unless already addressed)? I have struggled most my life with reading and comprehension (I am a pastor; hold a Masters degree; was officially diagnosed as an adult with adhd). I don’t want to bring attention to myself, but there’s been no lack of the Spirit or effort on my behalf to daily study Scriptures as every believer should, without still struggling daily for years to focus and retain God’s word. I’ve used audio Bible in parallel with my reading approach at times and notice that’s an improvement. But I wonder how many of your viewers struggle with this with which no modern translation will cure - simply because it reads on a lower grade level than other formal equivalent translations? I’m simply stating this because reading comprehension isn’t an IQ issue or simply because they’re unsaved, exclusively. I have finally determined that single column bibles, this Holman one being “The one” are superior for reading retention! I’m glad they included translator references, concordance, and great maps instead of rendering it as a minimalist print. Honestly, I’ve never given single column bibles a “chance” over the years because I’ve always felt they were limited in approach and I was “missing” something, such as robust cross references, maps, or were smaller font print, or printed on thinner paper, etc. But having read the huma Holman scwm, with no desire of adding personal notes - to keep the distraction free appeal intact - I believe it could be a real gift to anyone needing greater focus in their devotional reading time. Sure, some do a great job of adding their personal notes, marks, etc which has great value and why the wide margin should be celebrated, however, there is great value in leading pages unmarked for retention reading, in my opinion. I believe this wide margin, without my cluttering it up, ongoing, provides the best distraction free Bible reading approach I’ve ever experienced - hands down! Just want to mention this in the event there are other readers not considering certain factors in their pursuit of bible purchases. Does single column formatting offer adhd, distracted readers (when coupled with the excellent and opaque paper + outstanding bold and line matched print) a superior tool? I believe it’s worth a video segment to help many who may not have given thought to certain advantages! Love your channel. God bless!
I recently got the CSB ancient faith study Bible and have always preferred NKJV, but I can’t put my CSB down. I love how translation bolds OT quotes in NT and translation is really good if you have a good background on scripture. I do prefer single column for preaching over verse by verse so if I choose one it would depend on what I use it for so I will go for single column since I have the scientific faith verse by verse
Awesome! Thanks for sharing.
I have the CSB single column verse by verse wide margin and it is currently my favorite. I like that it is not too thick or heavy but still good margins for more taking.
I didn’t know they made that!
I’m going to preorder the new vbv. I tried vbv layout for preaching on my iPad the other day and it was a revelation (although the verses were also spaced). I do like that the poetry isn’t versified, also. I find that can really interfere with reading. Nice comparison, thanks.
Nice!!
Fantastic review - really helpful, thanks!
If I were buying mostly for note taking, that narrower inner gutter on the vbv would be a deal breaker... (At least it looks narrower in the video...??) It looks like there's no real space for notes on the inner column. The SC looks better for reading too, IMHO, because of its darker font and no references - it looks so clean... But if someone were going to use one for preaching, I could see the vbv would be a better bet...
Do you know if the leathersoft editions use the same paper???
I believe the do use the same paper on these, but I have not seen the leathersoft versions in person to confirm that.
Did you buy the vbv? I've been wondering about the inner margin also. It doesn't look like it would be enough room to write in. But I like that it's a reference Bible!
Great review Tim; I love the side-by-side reviews! I would most definitely purchase the single margin version. I prefer a single column over a two column Bible. I find them much easier to read! I have a brand new CSB 2 column Bible that I have never used. I love the 13 point font, but they put the cross references at the end of paragraph, in a lighter, smaller font in black. I find it some what annoying, and that they should have put the references in red. If there is more than one reference for a verse, they put them at the bottom of the page. Anyway, I would much prefer the single column you reviewed. I’m going to send this to Cat to gift to someone that is in need of finding the Lord! 💖 ✝️
I really like the SC, too!
I would pick the verse by verse all day long and twice on Sunday!! I do not like single column in general. But also love how the verse numbers are a different color. This is a great thing for preaching!
It's a great one, Tim!
I would go with the single column myself
I like that one a lot.
I think, if I had to choose only one of these, it would be the SCWM. I love the layout, font size and overall look of the Bible. That being said, I have both and would not want to give up either of them. As far as the translation, I have truly become a fan of the CSB. I have used the NRSV for 30 years. I think I found a translation that I would actually put the NRSV in the number 2 slot in my tops 5 for. I tis just readable and it flows. It is like they took the best of the NRSV (Accuracy) and the NIV (Readability) and mixed them together. I am just a fan! Anyway, thanks for the review.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Tim. I really love this SC, too.
Single column. The text size and layout always seems just a bit small on the VBV for me. And I really enjoy poetry settings.
Nice!
Hey Tim, I recently picked up a synoptic Gospels parallel Bible. This is the NRSV. I was curious as to the nuances between the Gospel writers. For example, in Mark’s Gospel, The Holy Spirit drove Jesus out to the wilderness to be tempted. In Matthew and Luke, he is led by the Spirit. In Mark, the heavens are torn open at his baptism. My pastors talk about these, so this parallel Bible (with footnotes to Greek manuscripts) is very helpful. Stay awesome, Mike- Gospel Parallels: A Comparison of the Synoptic Gospels, New Revised Standard Version Hardcover - November 30, 1992
That’s really interesting, Mike! Thanks for sharing!
So I have both and have preached from both. I typically do expository preaching so you'd think a verse by verse would be the one but I can't lie - the SCWM has replaced my previous preaching Bible and it'll take something impressive from Holman to make me change again.
Wow… great endorsement!
Do the red verse numbers in SCWM help you to find the verses quicker when preaching?
Two years ago I didn't even know or realize there were so many different layouts of the bible like double-column or single-column or verse-by-verse and now I know I prefer verse-by-verse when doing in-depth studying or following along at church. And for regular reading, for me, there is a preference for double-column vs. single-column depending on the layout of the single-column. If there are wide margins and the single column doesn't fill the page to the borders and it's easy to follow each line then it's really about the layout for reading. And my eyes demand 8 point font or larger. So it's really about what you'll use the bible for mainly. I never knew there were so many layouts for the bible until I started collecting and using them for various tasks. So that's really the deciding factor for me. What was the question again?
Hahaha… so much to consider!!
If considering a premium CSB you would choose one of these over a Schuyler Quentel? 🤔
Between the two of these, I think I’m leaning a bit to the VBV but it’s close!
Get the VbV The paper is 36gsm I belive where the Schyluer is 24.
@@majorlovelace3859 it’s 28 GSM but that’s a fair point. I wouldn’t be writing in the Quentel, whereas these two options are clearly meant for some form of note-taking. IMO the Schuyler is more premium, but if you are primarily looking to write in your Bible then these two options seem to be the best available for the CSB translation.
Hey Colby! I still think the Schuyler CSB Quentel is the most premium CSB available… their quality and consistency is really in matched.
But I do like these Holman text blocks a lot, and the wide margins give it a bit of a different feel. Great Bibles for the price.
@@timwildsmith yes. CSB in Quentel would be 11 font. But this is nice.
So I messed up and ordered a single column wide margin without really thinking things through. Maybe I'll learn to enjoy it, but I find 2 coulmn Bibles much easier to read.
I got 2 copies of the vbv of the csb and I am loving it.
Nice!!
I do like both, but i would go with vbv .. Firstly because its vbv and secondly, i just don't like the heft of the single column
Makes sense!
Tim thanks. I have the verse by verse . 10 pt Font and good references.
👍🏼👍🏼
Too bad there isn't a premium CSB personal size single column available.
I got the Wide Margin, it's amazing, but kind of big for hauling around or even hand held reading on my couch. The text setting is a perfect reader though.
Shrink the wide margin single column a bit to 9.5-10 (from 10.5), 28GSM premium paper, and trim the margins a bit and you have an amazing CSB reader.
Maybe one day!
I agree.. we NEED a premium personal size CSB
Both look awesome!
I think so too!
I would go with the wide margin Bible just for the font.
👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Is either red letter?
Nope!
I suppose for this type of Bible I’d go with the verse by verse - I think I would want a wide margin to be more of a study tool, so the cross references would be helpful - that is if I used wide margin Bibles… really, chop those margins off the paragraph one and it looks something I would want to buy.
Good thinking!
I love verse-by-verse, but I’m not a fan of single-column. Can you guess my favorite? You’re right. Two-column, verse-by-verse.
Verse by verse as I already have an ESV single column.
👍🏼👍🏼❤️
It’s almost a toss up. I’m a fan of verse by verse though. I have not had any single column bibles though. Maybe I’d get a less expensive one and try it out.
Good idea!
I was in that mode and bought both in the less expensive covers. That way I could really give them both a try.
✨ I would get the verse by verse. ✨
It's a good one!
The CSB verse-by-verse would be the perfect layout, in my opinion, if they would make the Bible a touch wider so the inner margin could be as wide as the outer. Essentially, combine it with the cross way wide margins.
You sound like a Bible designer!
I have an old NIV84 wide margin from Cambridge and it has wide margins all around the text. The size of the Bible is 10x7 so it's bigger than these. I am not finding any wide margin that I like. I'll probably just get this one rebound!
Single column. Easier to read for me.