vector find resultant of 3 vectors.MOD

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 314

  • @sonderman8079
    @sonderman8079 Рік тому +11

    The most methodical way this topic was explained. Thanks you & I love your accent.

  • @manusaini13
    @manusaini13 5 років тому +117

    This guy made more sense than every other tutor on this topic.

  • @GamingDamage
    @GamingDamage 9 років тому +74

    Thank you for this!
    Was lost in Physics lectures and been stumped trying to review notes and do the work, this video made it stick with me.
    10/10

    • @crish1610
      @crish1610 5 років тому

      You got 10 likes lol

  • @Muks23
    @Muks23 9 місяців тому +14

    Anyone watching in 2024 best tutor so far on this topic 🙏🙌🙌

  • @asher7849
    @asher7849 10 місяців тому +2

    I was having a hard time understanding the negative and positives signs. Your explanation is crystal clear. Thank you so much brother.

  • @Kamabushi999
    @Kamabushi999 4 роки тому +3

    Fantastic explanation!
    very good job..
    thank you very much
    Students nowadays are so lucky
    there is literally no excuse for not doing well. When I went to college circa graduation 1979 there was nothing to help except a pay tutor or family member
    no PCs no You tube , maybe a library but no calculators....nothing.
    I picked up my 41 yr old text book and tried to do a problem but no avail
    so listened to this video and within 15 minutes it all came back.

  • @yasminlove5930
    @yasminlove5930 6 років тому +15

    7 years after this was posted and this really helped me with a problem I was stuck on!! thanks so much

  • @thegirl10438
    @thegirl10438 10 років тому +2

    I have spent an hour trying to find a video to help me understand this... you are the ONLY one that I understood! thank you!

  • @aggieneer02
    @aggieneer02  12 років тому +13

    This is a very common method in mechanical and civil engineering. Glad you liked it.

  • @epokal1
    @epokal1 4 роки тому +7

    you are the tutor ive been looking for

  • @johnconnolly9634
    @johnconnolly9634 11 років тому +1

    One of the best explained videos regarding vectors thank you so much. you got me out of a big hole by your skill of explaining these equations. Everything kicked in after watching your video. Thank you Aggieer

  • @leong1981
    @leong1981 2 роки тому +1

    Great teaching . It is real simple and easy to understand.

  • @thenotoriousgurt4822
    @thenotoriousgurt4822 11 років тому +1

    brilliant video. I didnt quite understand the mathematics behind finding the answer prior to watching this but now i do. thank you very much :)

  • @aleahbousquet7386
    @aleahbousquet7386 10 років тому +6

    This was so helpful! I've been lost in my Honors physics class and this totally cleared it up! Thank you so much :)

  • @paulgarcia2887
    @paulgarcia2887 4 роки тому +2

    I cannot find the words to express just how much gratitude I have towards you

  • @AlejandraVazquez-y2y
    @AlejandraVazquez-y2y 4 місяці тому

    Amazing video and the greatest explanation I have seen so far. Thank you!!

  • @69Paulita
    @69Paulita 3 роки тому

    You gave the most amazing explanation. I can't believe how simple you made this out to be!! You rock!! Thank you so much!!

  • @rrainboowdash
    @rrainboowdash 4 роки тому +10

    Your pen is so cool :00 and thank you so much for this lesson! It really helped me

  • @ruzzz5599
    @ruzzz5599 7 років тому +1

    I was confused at the negative theta.Now I know how to do it!Thank you sooo much!

  • @Khalphite191
    @Khalphite191 10 років тому +14

    Thank you soo much *-*, Even my classmates were seeking help from me after I understood this thanks to your video!
    Really! this was really a good help for me since I'm kinda bad with numbers!

  • @romariobryan1224
    @romariobryan1224 3 роки тому +4

    This video from 9 years ago made so much more sense than the new videos on this topic. I will be using this table its such a good idea 💡

  • @dalizadarisman9585
    @dalizadarisman9585 4 роки тому +1

    Im thankful this vid exist. I stucked for long time then get the answer by using your solution . Thank you !

  • @aronaughty
    @aronaughty 7 років тому

    Thank you so much... I was trying to solve mean wind vectors and had forgotten how to solve it!!! Thanks for the concise yet brilliant video!!!

  • @davidhill8163
    @davidhill8163 2 роки тому +1

    This tutorial was amazing. Really well explained at a pace that was great for me.

  • @johnpatrickcruz2569
    @johnpatrickcruz2569 9 років тому +4

    You sir, just saved my life. Thank you very much. :)

  • @Olek216
    @Olek216 2 роки тому +1

    Even 10 years later this remains useful, never got taught this method probably because I don’t live in America but man this makes everything so much simpler

  • @gamingcat6865
    @gamingcat6865 10 місяців тому

    thank you so much. i kept seeing videos of people solving without reference angles.

  • @MrBudderman-ix2kw
    @MrBudderman-ix2kw 4 роки тому +2

    Missed a zoom meeting and you saved me. Very easy to follow, especially since you gave us the formulas

  • @hayllatte
    @hayllatte 6 років тому +3

    Thank you so much! Your explanation is easy to understand for a non-english speaker like me 😢. And you helped me

  • @cocoyana
    @cocoyana 7 років тому +8

    Thank you, you save my force table lab report. This is much easier than to use parallelogram rule.

  • @danielsvnchez
    @danielsvnchez 6 років тому +3

    Thank you! Great and simple explanation :)

  • @aggieneer02
    @aggieneer02  11 років тому +2

    @ archie lim:
    Trigonometric functions use standard notation that is defined from the x-axis. So the 160lb force has an angle that is referenced to the x-axis and we use it. The other two forces have angles referenced to the y-axis, so we must find the angle they make with the x-axis and use it. I hope this helps.

    • @darlinadzaqura8670
      @darlinadzaqura8670 10 років тому

      hey is the resultant force same as magnitude. please helpp

    • @aggieneer02
      @aggieneer02  10 років тому

      Darlina Dzaqura
      Yes, the resultant force is the magnitude of the three forces combined. Every vector has both magnitude and direction. The magnitude will be a unit (kg, lbs, m/s, etc) and the direction will be which way that magnitude is pointing.

    • @darlinadzaqura8670
      @darlinadzaqura8670 10 років тому +1

      omg thank you sooo much

    • @gretawilliams8799
      @gretawilliams8799 8 років тому

      Are the formulas Mag=(fx2+fy2)^1/2 and theta=tan-1(Fy/fx) applicable for any problems?

  • @elinessmutakilamfunda1417
    @elinessmutakilamfunda1417 Рік тому +1

    Excellent tutorial.. it was so simplified with full details of everything required 😌 thanks a bunch ... I'm having my physics exams tomorrow and this has really helped me alot😊❤🎉

  • @蘭巴拉爾
    @蘭巴拉爾 4 роки тому +1

    I love his southern accent and its also super helpful

  • @afamobanor
    @afamobanor 5 років тому +3

    Sir this video help a lot this topic was giving me a lot of trouble and now its easy

  • @Iwoodlikethat
    @Iwoodlikethat 8 років тому

    Thanks for this video! I was looking for one on how to find a vector using the resultant and one vector and your table really helped be see how to work it backwards!

  • @aggieneer02
    @aggieneer02  11 років тому

    It is just a way to organize your numbers so that you don't "misplace" any. When working structural problems where you have forces and moments in three dimensions, it makes it a lot easier to keep up with all the information.
    Glad that it could help you.

  • @goat5371
    @goat5371 4 роки тому

    You r amazing.....👌👌👌

  • @KINGFF-hx9el
    @KINGFF-hx9el 3 роки тому

    You are a life saver I tried every website I only understood you

  • @Dylan230393
    @Dylan230393 11 років тому +1

    always trust a cowboy, great video explained really well and didn't skip anything thanks heaps!!

  • @aggieneer02
    @aggieneer02  11 років тому +1

    An angle of 270 degrees is on the negative y axis, so the x component would be zero and the y component would be -y (or -r in vector terminology).
    So if you have a force of 400 lbs at 270 degrees, the x component would be x=0, and the y component would be y = -400.
    Hope that helps.

  • @ebohsamsonadikwu290
    @ebohsamsonadikwu290 3 роки тому

    This was very helpful and well explained.

  • @christine2175
    @christine2175 Рік тому

    Would love to see videos of Statics (structural engineering maths like are used in both engineering and architecture). I found your video on resultant of 3 vectors (this video) and you explained it so much more easily than the professor of the class my adult kid is taking. You do a great job of, how do we say, "explain it like I'm 5 years old", which is exactly what lost students need more of! Or reach out if you do any tutoring :)

    • @aggieneer02
      @aggieneer02  Рік тому

      I would eventually like to do a statics series of videos, but the amount of time it takes vs the reward through you tube is so small. One day I hope to be able to get to that.......

  • @HWoodENT
    @HWoodENT 3 роки тому

    Great video and very easy to comprehend

  • @krishnachougule8390
    @krishnachougule8390 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much for this tutorial. It was much needed !!!

  • @UyandaTalksChelsea
    @UyandaTalksChelsea 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much. This is really helping with my physics homework.

  • @itumeleng9594
    @itumeleng9594 2 місяці тому

    Timeless value shared 🙌

  • @islammohammadi
    @islammohammadi 4 роки тому

    Thanks man. Very easy and helpful explination

  • @TheVideoVolcano
    @TheVideoVolcano 7 років тому

    This guy can teach. Well done

  • @aggieneer02
    @aggieneer02  11 років тому +2

    Make sure you put the negative component in parentheses. Many calculators are programmed such that -2 squared is -4 but (-2) squared is 4. Also, make sure you are using the negative key and not the subtraction key. The negative key is usually look like (-) or +/-
    Please let me know if this solved your problem.

  • @hestonkariuki2963
    @hestonkariuki2963 3 роки тому

    Very educative.i wish I wish I could go back to school.

  • @isratjahanina3938
    @isratjahanina3938 10 місяців тому

    thank you so much for such amazing and understandable content.and it really helps me to clear my concept in better way .

  • @manoshah903
    @manoshah903 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the concept to find magnitude and direction be blessed

  • @V_MA
    @V_MA 11 років тому

    Great Video! I finally got it! Thanks a lot!!!

  • @aggieneer02
    @aggieneer02  11 років тому +2

    I have lots more videos (and will actually be uploading a large bunch later this semester) but they are math videos. Since I am a math teacher, that is what I focus on. I am hopeful that some of my videos can help you in physics. Search through my others, as there are many trig videos that can help. Glad this one helped you.

  • @jakariakhan1002
    @jakariakhan1002 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the video.

  • @meenaruhal3973
    @meenaruhal3973 4 роки тому +1

    Hi there, just need a clarification on- why it can't be 180-69.68 as well, as tan is negative in 2nd quadrant too? thanks

  • @syafeenazezane7817
    @syafeenazezane7817 7 років тому

    you help me a lot. thank you so much. you are a great teacher!

  • @11oclock13
    @11oclock13 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks thanks u saved my life ❤❤❤

  • @numanisse8927
    @numanisse8927 6 років тому

    it'S very good thanks

  • @aggieneer02
    @aggieneer02  13 років тому

    @zepfuck - Not sure what you are asking, could you rephrase your question? By definition in mathematics all clockwise angles are considered in the negative direction if that is what you are referring to. If you can clarify your question, I would be glad to help.

  • @mariyamsiddiqui6639
    @mariyamsiddiqui6639 6 років тому

    best explanation ever!!
    THANK YOU

  • @TheWanderbugChannel
    @TheWanderbugChannel 7 років тому +2

    THANK YOU SO MUCH THIS WAS SO HELPFUL

  • @leratogladys9823
    @leratogladys9823 Рік тому +1

    Thank you so much sir you are amazing

  • @ZeroCooly
    @ZeroCooly 8 років тому +2

    thank you so much, i had trouble staying awake in class today, you just saved my homework grade.

  • @aggieneer02
    @aggieneer02  11 років тому +1

    Both are forces, so the problem would be the same. If you change the units in the problem to N, the resultant force would be the same number, but the units would be N.
    I hope this helps.

  • @physics67
    @physics67 2 роки тому +1

    Thank teacher.

  • @benjaminmabute5497
    @benjaminmabute5497 3 роки тому

    THANK YOU! YOU REALLY DID A GOOD JOB! :D

  • @surajkumar-ok7dm
    @surajkumar-ok7dm 8 років тому

    this is really very interesting

  • @veenamurali7259
    @veenamurali7259 5 років тому

    Thanks for this video,it was so helpful to me

  • @Happyman-od7zp
    @Happyman-od7zp 7 років тому

    Thank you very much, my Physics teacher did not explain clearly on how to do this!

  • @aggieneer02
    @aggieneer02  11 років тому +1

    Just a quick back of the napkin calculation, I come up with a resultant of roughly 152 N. Because all of these are East of North, they will be additive......I think 70 N is way too low.

  • @maxh3000
    @maxh3000 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much!

  • @nadayusra9305
    @nadayusra9305 5 років тому

    Thank you for the video. It really helping me

  • @Simbaa3349
    @Simbaa3349 Рік тому

    The gift that keeps on giving 🔥

  • @jessejames258
    @jessejames258 4 роки тому

    How do you know what direction the vectors are supposed to be pointing? When that one vector says 160 lbs at 25 degrees, is that 25 north and south of the X axis? Y axis? Negative X or Y?

    • @aggieneer02
      @aggieneer02  4 роки тому

      Standard position of an angle is from the positive x axis, rotating counter clockwise. Depending on how you solve the problem, you will usually get angles as reference angles. I have some other videos that talk about Standard position vs. reference angles. Best to check those out. If you don't have a strong grasp of trigonometry rules, vectors will give you a lot of trouble.

  • @Kumurajiva
    @Kumurajiva 6 років тому

    Excellent

  • @jenalee1907
    @jenalee1907 6 років тому

    This was really good! Tysm

  • @hypnotize8155
    @hypnotize8155 10 років тому

    We need more professors like you. Can you please make videos for Physics 2? Electromagnetism? and more statics videos as well! Gig'em!

    • @aggieneer02
      @aggieneer02  10 років тому +1

      Is there a topic from Statics that you would like to see? I am a math teacher, but my background is mechanical engineering, so I would be glad to help.

    • @justcharacter2098
      @justcharacter2098 Рік тому

      @@aggieneer02 hello, may I ask why you also did not subtract the 25 degree angle from 90 degree on quadrant 4?

    • @aggieneer02
      @aggieneer02  Рік тому

      @@justcharacter2098 all of our basic trigonometric definitions are based on the x-axis, so you will see that I do everything from that axis. You can reference from the y-axis, but it takes some work. I find that trying to explain that in a video tends to overcomplicate it.
      So the simplest way to work any problem involving trigonometry - always reference to the nearest x-axis. I hope that helps explain it.

  • @rayonprince4551
    @rayonprince4551 3 роки тому

    great explanation, thank you

  • @PlainVlogs
    @PlainVlogs 5 років тому

    sick video bro

  • @raerenzgaza3201
    @raerenzgaza3201 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks very much

  • @coolrippleuser7143
    @coolrippleuser7143 4 роки тому +1

    This man is using a goddamn fountain pen

  • @shahidnazeer8687
    @shahidnazeer8687 3 роки тому

    very simple and answer my query. my query , i am trying to solve but can't , may i learn more from you

  • @this0is0me8
    @this0is0me8 9 років тому

    Anyone ever tell you, you sound like the son on King Of The Hill? well anyways slowly crawling through your play-list because my teacher apparently neglects critical aspects to help curb my learning curve. Great vids!! this is the beginning of a beautiful Subscription.

  • @cutesunnyaegyo
    @cutesunnyaegyo 7 років тому

    THANK YOUUU SOOO MUUCCHHH! I finally understood everything! Thanks!!!

  • @jubjub567
    @jubjub567 8 років тому +1

    Thank you very much you just made my day!!!

  • @iyannan9451
    @iyannan9451 5 років тому

    Thanks you😘😍

  • @sutilove2094
    @sutilove2094 8 років тому

    Great ,thank you so much :)
    l hope you keep on

  • @Dennis-zo3pk
    @Dennis-zo3pk 2 роки тому

    This was so helpful 🔥

  • @videoawesome9316
    @videoawesome9316 2 роки тому

    I love the fountain pen!

  • @huiae
    @huiae 7 років тому

    THANK YOU SO MUCH!! so that's how it was done :)

  • @VynxSynyztyrCorros
    @VynxSynyztyrCorros 4 місяці тому

    Thank you brother I finally understand it
    I can make the time machine now

  • @greggast9824
    @greggast9824 6 років тому +1

    Thank you so much. What would you do in the case that the vector is at an angle of 270˚. Would the angle be changed to 90˚. Also when the vector is right on the x or y axis how would you know if the x or y values for the eqaution are positive or negative since they're not in a quadrant.

    • @aggieneer02
      @aggieneer02  6 років тому

      90 and 270 are "basically" equivalent. Here is the quick and dirty....
      Your x-components will be positive in Quadrants I and IV because the x-axis is positive there, and negative in Quadrants II and III because it is negative there. Same with y. When a vector lands on a quadrant line, it doesn't have both components.
      For example, let's say you have 100 pounds at 270 degrees, the components would be < 0, -100> or x = 0 and y = -100. This is due to the fact that the force is acting in the negative y direction.
      The longer explanation is the value of sine and cosine at quadrantal values (0, 90, 180, 270).
      Does that help?

    • @greggast9824
      @greggast9824 6 років тому

      Yes, thank you so much.

  • @binthesolaiman5841
    @binthesolaiman5841 8 років тому

    Thanks alooooooot
    your explanation helped me
    I was struggling to understand it before my physics paper but thanks to I got it

  • @eatyourgingerbeef
    @eatyourgingerbeef 12 років тому

    never seen it done this way, its great thanks

  • @Ya_Ali_313_
    @Ya_Ali_313_ Рік тому

    On 4:01 - isn't it supposed to be 160(cos(65)) and not 160(cos(25)), because it looked like you were getting the angle 25 from quadrant 3 and not from quadrant 4. In quadrant 4, you should've done 90 - 25 = 65. I might be wrong so please, if so, correct me. Thank you

    • @aggieneer02
      @aggieneer02  Рік тому +1

      In trigonometry, all of your functions are defined based on the x-axis. So if not measured from the x-axis, then we need to find the complement (90 minus that angle). Let me know if that makes sense why I did what I did.

    • @Ya_Ali_313_
      @Ya_Ali_313_ Рік тому +1

      ​@@aggieneer02perfect, I understand thank you 🙏

  • @user-ft6hk6yy5d
    @user-ft6hk6yy5d 6 років тому

    God bless you and your pen

  • @poirotmysteries
    @poirotmysteries 10 років тому +2

    Thanks for this!

  • @jianweixian5562
    @jianweixian5562 Рік тому

    YOU'RE A LIFE SAVER🙏