@@tonkis4812 well my Celica stoped burning Oil after some flushing engine. Catalyst converter inside looks clean so idk what is a problem 🤣🤣 its lambda sensor issue or what
@@y.morales6898 you joking? '93-'99 Celica weakest engine was 115hp, than 136, 175 and gt4 with 242hp and awd, even' 89-'93 Celica had 2,0 t awd 202hp, far faster than Honda, just check WRC historical models
@@subaruforester5208 despite kW - same engine, same crap:P..all zz series were a failure..just like most of toyota's engines post '00..a little more successful ones were NZ series engines, and AR series engines without direct injection and only naturally aspirated ones..the rest from toyota is proble'valve'matic crap..toyota made very good engines in the 90ties..then, except NZ and AR series in the displacement shelf up to 2.5L, there's nothing else worth even mentioning..or looking for any reliability..
@@Ggungaginga i'm not less disappointed of powerful na engines extinction than you are;p..but zz series were already affected by regulations (or stupid toyota decisions, like needless open deck block design n many more) and weren't so robust n reliable like previous toyota engines..and most of engines already after ~'05 and mostly after ~'10 are complete crap..most turbocharged with lots of power in low end, which makes no sense for the manual gearbox driven cars, cos you have no grip on your wheels, due to huge n redundant amount of nm in low rev range..that's why most cars are with automatic transmissions..no fun for any true petrol head..i'm the true na (vtec type) revvy engines and manual transmissions lover, so i hate all new crappy, unreliable n over-complicated engines (with a lifespan of 150-200kkm at best with lots of problems even below 100kkm mark, or even lower), run on water thin oils, with mostly plastic components..so just shut up..but if i had to choose from vtec type engines post '00naughties, i'd definitely chose nissans SR20VE (the most reliable n least sensor equipped one, would be the utimate n all time best vtec-ish engine, if only had their own QR, or honda K series bottom end, crankshaft fixing not with separate caps, but with a one piece aluminium crankshaft holder-bottom end), or i'd chose honda K series (though those had a lot of common problems to ZZ series) engines and only then ZZ series toyota engines - in order of reliability, performance-tuning-wise - firstly K series engines, then SR20VE, and again, only then ZZ series engines..but most likely i'd chose mid-late 90ties also post '00ties 3S-GE (from 3rd to 5th gen.) from toyota instead of ZZ, if i only had such opportunity..cos they were a lot more successful n reliable engines than ZZ series..so zz from toyota was already a downfall in terms of quality n reliability..burned oil, often had piston rings seizure, thin-walled liners, deforming or even cracking sleeves, had lots of problems with chain rattle, looseness n tension, worn cam phaser-actuators gears, n in essence were disposable, one-time-use engines n had faulty design open deck blocks (cos they all are as a design itself)(just like K series n most post '00engines)..3s-ge vteckish n revvy closed deck block design engines were the last good ones from toyota..zz was a downfall n failure..so defend your shit somewhere else;p..n never use a word legendary near the letters ZZ:P
Japanese cars engine check light be like: dont mind me just watchin
😂
They coming becouse catalyst converter 😂 I have same issue in my Celica. Lambda sensor didnt like dirty exaust gasses 😅
@@razor6031tv them gases are full of oil. Catalysts don't like it 😢
@@tonkis4812 well my Celica stoped burning Oil after some flushing engine. Catalyst converter inside looks clean so idk what is a problem 🤣🤣 its lambda sensor issue or what
Aftermarket exhaust experience
Damnn man, your shifts are perfect!
nice 0-100 result, great techno look car but hard to find now
Хорошо едет тачка👍
wygluszenie naszej kochanej cesi to mistrzostwo :D slychac jak zaba flaki zostawia. Poza tym auto mistrzostwo
Ojj tak 😄😄
Nice man. I do like these cars. The Civic Type R is a lot more aggressive though! 🙂
Of course that a type-r is a lot agressive 😶. No logic that comparison my guy. Different levels
@@y.morales6898 Lol not really, EK type r is very similar in terms of performance, even the EP3, hell even the dc2 integra, all comparable cars man.
@@LeSwexy Idk Swexy, 1998 type r had 185 hp and this in the 1.6 engine, 1998 celica had only 115 hp, there is a huge different buddy
@@y.morales6898 you joking? '93-'99 Celica weakest engine was 115hp, than 136, 175 and gt4 with 242hp and awd, even' 89-'93 Celica had 2,0 t awd 202hp, far faster than Honda, just check WRC historical models
Toyota celica 1.8 105kw 2005
Im planning on buying, it has 230 000km.
Youve got celica, what yo7 say man
Yay or nay
105 kw have engine problem,the problem is that burning oil,141kw no problem oil a good sports car
@@subaruforester5208 2005 is a facelift model wich should not have the oil problem. But 230.000 km is a lot.
buy the 141kw version..There is no comparison
@@subaruforester5208 despite kW - same engine, same crap:P..all zz series were a failure..just like most of toyota's engines post '00..a little more successful ones were NZ series engines, and AR series engines without direct injection and only naturally aspirated ones..the rest from toyota is proble'valve'matic crap..toyota made very good engines in the 90ties..then, except NZ and AR series in the displacement shelf up to 2.5L, there's nothing else worth even mentioning..or looking for any reliability..
@@Ggungaginga i'm not less disappointed of powerful na engines extinction than you are;p..but zz series were already affected by regulations (or stupid toyota decisions, like needless open deck block design n many more) and weren't so robust n reliable like previous toyota engines..and most of engines already after ~'05 and mostly after ~'10 are complete crap..most turbocharged with lots of power in low end, which makes no sense for the manual gearbox driven cars, cos you have no grip on your wheels, due to huge n redundant amount of nm in low rev range..that's why most cars are with automatic transmissions..no fun for any true petrol head..i'm the true na (vtec type) revvy engines and manual transmissions lover, so i hate all new crappy, unreliable n over-complicated engines (with a lifespan of 150-200kkm at best with lots of problems even below 100kkm mark, or even lower), run on water thin oils, with mostly plastic components..so just shut up..but if i had to choose from vtec type engines post '00naughties, i'd definitely chose nissans SR20VE (the most reliable n least sensor equipped one, would be the utimate n all time best vtec-ish engine, if only had their own QR, or honda K series bottom end, crankshaft fixing not with separate caps, but with a one piece aluminium crankshaft holder-bottom end), or i'd chose honda K series (though those had a lot of common problems to ZZ series) engines and only then ZZ series toyota engines - in order of reliability, performance-tuning-wise - firstly K series engines, then SR20VE, and again, only then ZZ series engines..but most likely i'd chose mid-late 90ties also post '00ties 3S-GE (from 3rd to 5th gen.) from toyota instead of ZZ, if i only had such opportunity..cos they were a lot more successful n reliable engines than ZZ series..so zz from toyota was already a downfall in terms of quality n reliability..burned oil, often had piston rings seizure, thin-walled liners, deforming or even cracking sleeves, had lots of problems with chain rattle, looseness n tension, worn cam phaser-actuators gears, n in essence were disposable, one-time-use engines n had faulty design open deck blocks (cos they all are as a design itself)(just like K series n most post '00engines)..3s-ge vteckish n revvy closed deck block design engines were the last good ones from toyota..zz was a downfall n failure..so defend your shit somewhere else;p..n never use a word legendary near the letters ZZ:P
How fast you maxed it?
Looking at acceleration this is 192 hp engine.
Friend had 143 hp one, and we maxed at 210 km/h
Ts max is bit less than 250
192.. is much better.. and I'm looking for one :)
Perfect!!Engine alarm?why?
removed catalyst,no problem
@@subaruforester5208 you should read the desc
@@fayyedz.2606 Or write the desc
@@subaruforester5208 you don't service it
WOW... proper speeding :) Congrats.. I can guess 7 sec to 60 kp/h :)
This making me thinking mines down on power it defo don’t accelerate as fast as that
youve most likely got a GT instead of a GTS
short shifter?
8250rpm switch
@@subaruforester5208 you don't even know what a short shifter is hahaha
Stock??
yes
@@subaruforester5208 una polla,NO stock.
@@JoseDiaz-lg7hj full stock
Zato placem boga molim 😁😁😀
yes
Its 143 hp engine ?
190
balkan??
Japan engine is small BUT power...
Manuel-Auto ?
manual
Jzz ㅠㅠ
Jezu to wcale nie jedzie tylko zgrzyczy...
XDDDDDDD
a ty czym jezdzisz co
To zobacz tę 140KM