China’s Fujian Supercarrier has sailed - Intel Assessment
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 лип 2024
- This briefing will examine the Fujian as a platform for operating aircraft, the likely air wing it will operate with, the potential composition of a fully operational PLA Navy Carrier Strike Group, and when the carrier might become operational.
Related briefings:
China's J-15B "Super" Shark: • China's J-15B "Super" ...
Chinese Navy of 2028: • Chinese Navy of 2028: ...
Type 076 Assault Carrier: • Type 076 Assault Carri...
China's Type 055 "Super" Destroyer: • China's Type 055 "Supe...
I think its amazing China not just built its own carriers domestically, also the radar, the point defense weapons, the carrier planes are all Chinese. Unlike some country they claim to build their own carriers but use USA Phalanx CIWS, or Sea RAM or ESSM point defense missiles and Carrier planes from Russia, MiG-29K, French Rafaele-M or F-35B..
love form 🇮🇳
Actually, the first Chinese carrier was built in the Ukraine, but reconstructed in China. The second Chinese carrier was essentially an improved version of the first carrier. The new carrier is the first true fully indigenous Chinese designed and built aircraft carrier though.
The pace of PLAN's progress is nothing less than a miracle. The path was extremely well organized and meticulous. A textbook level of engineering success.
Well done, China.
Many sour grapes seeing chinese new aircraft carrier starts sailing in the open sea
Eating nothing is useless
yeah those keep repeat crack on the carrier must eat way too many sour grape
Their blood pressure goes up and they are coughing blood. HAhaHAHAHa...
non-nuclear which means it needs to have a fuel tanker with it lol sink the tanker and its screwed ,. oh well
@@ponsfinances3336 you talk nonsense
they have range of 18k KM and you think they ot well protected?
When successfully commissioned, China will chain produce FUJIAN carriers and US will yell as overcapacity. 😂
Imagine China moves to 00H and then starts SELLING 003s to anybody who wants one. The US will be so pissed at China for making the rest of the world harder to invade. 😂
🤣🤣🤣
If the 003 is a successful carrier, no doubt china will start producing numerous fujian-class carriers quickly
😂😂😂
Nope, because China would’ve moved onto the Thorium powered 004 carriers. They’ve already announced nuclear powered cargo ships. Hint: meaning their future cruisers will also go nuclear. It wouldn’t make sense just to have its carriers have unlimited range.
remember, back in 49 china basically have no navy,
Remember back in 49' when the US was a apartheid state.
@@amunra5330 so? had had more then a dozen aircraft carrier and more then half of the wealth on this planet in 49, while china was a gigantic Somalia
@@user-cg3by6bb2g USA today is somalia in 90s , full of pirate
@@vilx1308 no need to brag we all know how evil the US is
they 23 April 1949 for the PLAN but the Roc had a navy before that
Who else thought the video headline said 'Fijian Supercarrier' and thought "Geez, their economy has boomed!!"
Well their economy did in fact experience a “boom”
Thank you for this briefing. I like how you also talked about the other aspects of the capability, not just the ship itself.
Thank you. Yes, it is more than just the carrier itself we need to consider.
Amazing quality content. Very well done. 👍
Thank you. Greatly appreciated.
Well done
Thank you.
If it's not American then it's garbage seems to be the consensus in the comments
they didn't know that the EMALS that the fujian is using is more advance than what the Gerald Ford is using to top it off the Ford carrier is brand new as well...
Yeah, it must be terrible. It's not like 50% of all new ships have been built in china for the last decade. . .
Its fear talking. Each day, the inevitable eventual war gets harder and harder😂
They have not use American product before LOL.. Clunky and sub standard built... Look at Boeing 737 so many issues and its not actual new.. Iy plague American made products i know as we import USA product 40 years ago.
Because it is much easier in this way😅
I am so happy I found this channel! Cheers mate, love your work
Thanks mate. Much appreciated.
Another excellent but worrying briefing mate! Cheers
Thanks Ken.
Always look forward to a new post from this channel. Research and presentation are excellent.
Thank you. Much appreciated.
Very thorough and well researched brief. Well done.
Thank you. Greatly appreciated.
9:10 "high tempo short duration operations"
Very good insight. This seem to fit Chinese thinking and doctrine.
7:57 I don't think Royal Navy of UK has any Fast Support Ships i.e. Fleet Support Ships that can keep up with carrier groups at 25 kn. Neither Tide class nor Wave class Support Ships of the Royal Navy can sustain over 20 kn. So only the USN and now PLAN has Fast Support Ships right now.
Fair comment. Even though the RN does call the Wave class "Fast Fleet Tankers", at @20kts they aren't in the same class as the US and Chinese vessels. They are however as capable in terms of variety and amount of replenishment they can distribute.
Could you do a video on either singapore or indonesia's current and future naval procurement programs?
I will be covering both of those in the future.
Nice video. Very timely and quick update to match the sea trials. Eurasian naval insight seems to think that it will be 2026 at the earliest for the Fujian to be commissioned and fully operational. I tend to agree with him, or at least to have one with J-35s on it and not just J-15s.. which is possible for 2025 I guess if just J-15s. But what's the point of doing that? China isn't in the middle of an active war and doesn't need any bonus brownie points for a 2025 operational completion.
Overall, 2025 seems to be too soon, considering all the new systems(catapults) usedband even new aircraft on board. And not just one, but even 2 or more.. like the J-35, the KJ-500/600, other helicopters AND THEN on top any possible UACV or other UAV. Like using UAVs as part of the kill chain for carrier killing missiles which will work with the type 055 for long range carrier vs carrier group battles far out at sea like 2nd island chain or even further out. Better to work everything out fully and iron out all the wrinkles, otherwise China might end up like usa did with the Gerald R Ford and it's teething issues and endless problems.
Are you alright? You sound like you're having a hard time finding breath to just speak.. is if because you can't speaking naturally and using some unnatural "acting voice" to read a pre written script? Hehe.
There also seems to be a large number of anti China wankers and/or pro US who comment on your videos for some reason. They like to ignore or downplay any of China's massive development and modernization efforts. I get it though, since these developments are endless and lessen or entirely remove USAs global hegemony which they either support or have gotten used to since it's the only world they've ever known.
So while it's understandable, it's also quite disappointing since the videos produced are for the most part fact based and steer clear of shallow politics and picking sides. As a fellow Aussie, keep up the good work mate.
Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance. They're at the first and the second stages, and that's human nature. But I believe they'll get used to the reality a few years later.
Where do you see this being deployed, what sort of mission?
Good question. In the first instance, the East China Sea and South China Sea, so within the first island chain. Then moving out into the Philippine Sea and western Pacific as far as Guam. Possibly also into the north-eastern Indian Ocean if China's SLOCs are threatened.
Protecting freedom of navigation on the West Coast of the United States
Interestingly, the US Navy drawing of the Type 054B appears to have 16 canisters for SSM, similar to the constellation-class. Seems like the USN expects China to fit that many, not just 8 like on the Type 054A
Their U-VLS is a smidge bigger too.
DC Current EMALS. Good job china.
does EMALS affect the skills of their pilots?
@@number1forthewin Sourgrape! A reliable EMALS ensure high combat sorties. I guess you must be an armchair general. You must be very bitter China EMALS is better than US junk.. Just like Boeing!
@@number1forthewin A relibale EMALS ensure high combat sorties tempo. You didnt know that? A unreliable EMALS will make your aircraft carrier just a floating flat top!
@@number1forthewin They are newbie but they will achive their goal. Like space station. They build space station by themself. China will go forward fastly. Unstopable. The dragon has woken up from its long sleep.
@@freezonechannel8639What newbie?? China being operating MagLev technology for so many years . EM catapult as PLA call it is a derivative MagLev, instead of carrying the Coach. The MagLev attached a hook to the jet being launched.
I wonder if since the chinese will likely have more aircraft (J-15B and J-35) than can be used on the 003 at once, if while operating within the SCS they will ferry aircraft from the mainland in the event of combat loses.
The extended ranges of the J-20 could be valuable to escort a tanker that would be needed for the carrier aircraft to reach the 003 if it were operation closer to the malacca straight during a conflict.
The carrier group may also include several Type 075 and Type 076 amphibious assault ships for some special circumstances.
Amphibious ship have completely different tasks and operation range from target. They cannot stay in the carrier group.
@@joelau2383可以包含，076会有一条电磁弹射器，用于弹射无人机。这样福建舰航母战斗群会有隐身舰载机+隐身无人机的战斗能力
Unlikely to be fully operational before 2027 because of use many new technologies. Great job by Chinese navy.
TheMighty🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳💯😘💪💪💪
amazing J35 ！
Construction of the lead Type 095 began in early 2017 (i.e. the vessel, as opposed to its parts). Isn't it highly likely that it has been commissioned by now, maybe even in 2022? (I.e. despite the chorus of denials..)
Construction of the 1st Type 096 began later, so.. ?
As I say in the briefing, currently one or two of the Type 093 family, but moving to the Type 095 class as they commission. I should have added "as they commission in numbers", as the new boats will take time to be fully operational. We are yet to see evidence of this.
The questions should be more in the line of can it launch fully fueled and armed high performance aircraft, the Yanks have something like a century of experience in carrier operations, a US carrier (and I'm estimating here) will most likely have a 4 or 5 times higher work/sortie rate of launching and recovering planes, China is going to need loads more of these to match the US
Especially when they start taking hits and have to perform damage control. The Japanese had much more modern naval experience by WW2 and still lost a lot of hulls from poor crew reaction; I'd imagine it'd be even worse for the PLA Navy as the last time China had a respectable open water navy was in like the Ming Dynasty. Meanwhile the US has had regular experience actually saving their warships from going under, and the intentional sinking for improvement evaluations of the ex-USS America supercarrier was notably difficult even without anyone aboard.
@@doujinflipChina can read a book, and they and they copy more then designed, they copy ideas, doctrines and how to handle equipment and how to organise, they do not need a learning curve like others, they already adopted what the enemy does best.
Don’t worry, they know what they do almost as good as US.
The US has a century of experience in the design, manufacture and operations of commercial airplanes but that doesn't prevent them to have wheels, doors and even planes falling off the sky. Does that mean something to you?
I'll wait until they launch a fully fueled J15.
That will be an important milestone.
@@Strategy_Analysis : Why do you 'like' your own comments ?
@@buildmotosykletist1987 why do you give a shit?
@@lorenrb80 : Because the CCP threatened to "Nuke" Australia.
@@Strategy_Analysis : Ha, ha, you blocked my comments. Unsubscribed.
🎉🎉🎉
Even with a dedicated AOR, I suspect the carrier / strike group will be thirsty with an associated range limitation?
Yes. But likely sufficient for short duration operations in the western Pacific.
@@Strategy_Analysis I guess as long as it doesn't come south of PNG.
@@Strategy_Analysis How about the Indian Ocean? How much will it limit their range if they decide to engage an Indian fleet via Sunda straits instead of Malacca?
@@death_parade I was just talking to someone about this very area. I plan to do a briefing on it later this year. Of course in a discussion about this Indonesia becomes a critical element. Port facilities in Cambodia might also play a part.
They not gonna being asshole that sail to atlantic
Senator Rubio said a ship made with bubble gum.
Hahaha tinood na
He has a brain like a bubble gum.
this is true😅
Definitely a shift in Chinese doctrine….Australia needs to take notice especially when launching front line warships with only 32launch tubes
Australia has no border dispute or historical dispute with China. As long as Australia doesn't act as a US lapdog, what could potentially happen between the two?
unprofessional? u mean ramping into cargo ship and have entire fleet rusting like mouthball fleet?
I see Ford imitations
They really would want thier logistics sorted hey, all those ships, 1 type 55, 2 type 52, 1 carrier, 3-4 frigates all diesel powered plus aircraft. Logistics is what america does best.
Logistics is the most important element.
Against guys in robe & sandals
@@andrean2247 that's a nothing conflict, military leaders in other countries know how quick and how much stuff America can move around. How else can you equip and keep up to 13 carrier battle groups operating at once when required
@@bestestusernameNot sure that you are the best in logistic, China know a thing or two about the importance on logistic, the Chinese infrastructure miracle show you that, railways, highways on land, ports all over the world, the land infrastructure they have show how their logistic will be when they start sailing for real, the largest replenishment fleet outside USA, with a huge margin, more blue water replenishment ships then the entire world outside US combined.
They will not start operating naval strike groups without a support.
@@MrCastodian I know in ww2 america supplied the world including china with weapons to win it, then supplied the free world with weapons in the cold war to defend freedom, and now the world wants american systems to defend themselves. they can supply everyone everywhere anytime.
On top of the combat aircrafts and fixed wings, it’ll also carry Gongji attack drones. The new EM railgun will also be on board soon😊
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Brother, I enjoy your content. Small gripe though. Re: pronouncing nuclear. We need to shout it from the roof tops that it's pronounced as it's spelled. I can't say I've seen any words in the dictionary spelled nucular, but I have heard of one that's phonetically pronounced nu-cle-ar. That other silly way is vapid americanism sneaking in to our lingo. I've even heard Australian prime ministers embarassingly failing this test. For God's sake our language is one of the cultural things that differentiates us as Australians from the US, and I don't know about you, but I'm proud of those differences. Banish that illiterate way of saying nuclear- pleaaaseeee. Otherwise it's after-school detention for you mister.
Mate, no worries. All good. I'm a product of where I've lived, which includes America (among other places). It's funny, on a previous briefing where I had to say "Z" frequently, one comment was "where does "zed" come from? Are you a Brit?" Also, it wouldn't be the first time I've been in detention.
@@Strategy_Analysis It is zed (or something like that) for most of Europe and former European colonies around the world. Except for Portugal. India is with us. And we are already making progress with the Chinese. If we can flip China to our side, we would have 90% of the world on the zed side. 😄
PS: it is from the Greek zeta, so zed is the correct term. I don't know where zi comes from.
Transitional. Nuclear by 2040 then its open confrontation In Asia pacific.
China has mastered the ship building now, chinese ship building is more advance than America , even European too at a very lower cost by compassion. if you look at the chinese strategy, they accquired both western and soviet ships for studied in the past, they build Shangdon based on soviet external frame and western internal bays . Now withFujian as the only 003 planed. the next type 004 will be series productions, the plan is going to have 6 more.
I think that America will definitely no longer can patrol in east china sea, south china sea.. then chinese navy will be patrol india ocean too , due to chinese investment in mid east and africa.. But chinese navy stand no chance in atlantic ocean, due to nato.
tofu-dregs
Nothing made in Chynah lasts longer than the time to take a photo....
Probably a Chinese CSG is effectively a match or dangerously even with every CSG outside an American one. Against an American one it's likely to lose but obviously one or two missiles hitting can cause all the difference. Vs Americans will probably stay under cover of land based aircraft or not sail.
Powerful enough to scare/bully most small to midsize individual countries in Asia or globally. We'll just have to see how many they manage to build and what upgrades they can do to keep up with the F35.
It's hard to catch up with the F35. But cheap small drones are a whole new field. And over there, China is not behind the US. We haven't even mentioned sea drones, both above and below the surface.
FC-31 is superior to the F-35 lmfao
The scary part is that 80% of all microchips used by the US military are made in China and have hardwired kill switches included that Xi controls. Why did it take so long to shoot down a single spy balloon from China. It took over a week to field strip the electronics on just 2 planes of those chips and rebuild them. Also the UK just had 2 failed test of their sub based nukes after getting electronics hardware updates from the US. My guess is China chips disabled the engines. The facts on the percentage of chips from China and the fact kill switches have been confirmed is straight from the DOD press releases. Noting 2 other flights of fighters were forced to return to base to land after electronic failures as they closed into range of the Balloon in Alaska and over the NW.
Nice. Now we need neighbouring countries to develop/invest in countermeasures.
Only Russia, China and Iran have carrier countermeasures. The US/west is still 20 years away from them simply because they havent had any reason to have them, until now.
Countermeasures for what?
Meanwhile in America:
What is a male?
What is a female?
What's in between a male and female?
Can i be both?
there is no real debate between the difference between male and female and not a recent development. But more so recognizing the fact that gender (not sex) is a social construct unique to humans and those who dont fit into that social construct fighting to exist. It has nothing to do with military preparedness or industrial capacity as the CPC seems ahead of the curve in recognizing these facts providing gender affirming care for its people who are gender non-conforming.
😂
cringe
Implessive, now where are they going to project naval power 😂
Pacific
entire world
@@General_MacArthur not without friendly ports and logistics something the plan doesn't have 🤣
@@andrean2247 lmao 😆, that's why the Chinese military is stupid, land based aviation will do the same thing for less, they couldn't project power beyond the first island chain
@@andrean2247 🤣 they can't get past the first island chain in the event of a war😅😂🤣
In the Korean War, the US was more experienced - following WW2, in fighting large-scale wars than China, and yet the low-tech Chinese peasant army successfully pushed the US back from the Yamal River to the 39th parallel.
The Indian army derives its origins from the British Indian army. Not even the US army was as battle-field experienced as the British Indian army. This army had fought in most if not all of the British colonial wars, WW1 and WW2. And yet - its Indian army progeny, faced with a largely low-tech Chinese peasant army without equivalent battle-field experience was defeated in
the 1962 border wars. Today's Chinese army is arguably a peer with the US, and no country has engaged a peer either in naval or land warfare since WW2. Chasing sandal-wearing goatherders in Iraq and Afghanistan does not count as peer-level battle-field experience.
The point is reliance on post-war archetypical battle-field experience is oversold, and leads to complacency.
Let's not forget, where are the front lines?
The idea that America could assemble 1 million+ men across the Atlantic or Pacific un molested is just fantasy.
China and Russia wouldnt allow the USA to preposition 1 million men required to attack.. it took near a year for America to mobilize and position in Saudi Arabia for the Iraq war.
Truth is that fighting a war using more powerful assets like carriers and destroyer but still using tactics from the second world war is dumb and stupid , It's seems the new tactic of war is to swamp the battlefield with low cost assets like drones and UAVs and whilst the high cost asset is dealing with these low cost assets send hypersonic and stealth assets to deliver the coup de grace ...rather like attacking an elephant with a swarm of wasps ....
That equalization is only valid on land, where casual combatants can use their own two feet to stage ambushes and regroup. Over the sea there is no place to hide, so combat favors the side with superior technology and experience to deal out and deal with damage while in between port calls at friendly harbors and airbases.
But, Chy-nah invaded Vietnam in 1979 - and was easily Repelled
You appear to have forgotten that oh WUMAO....
@@bluddyrowdy8757 Yeah, I forgot that the US defeated Vietnam, so must be superior combatants to China.
💓🐉🇨🇳🐉💓
Sinosphere
no worry! The 003 burn refine coal and can only travel at the speed of 10k, no threat at all!
烧的重油，而不是什么煤或者柴油之类的
Nice one China , served on the FORRESTAL class.
Thank you for your service!
Clueless folk: WHY AUKUS? WHY SO MUCH MONEY?!
Answer: This right here. China's insanely rapid naval modernisation program and aggressive geopolitical/grey zone strategy (see: Belts & Roads, South China Sea, Taiwan, all the rest). That's why.
Thanks for the excellent briefing mate.
Thank you.
AGGRESSIVELY BUILDING ROADS FOR SHARED TRADING INFRASTRUCTURE.
How many countries have they bombed fucko?
The Chinese 003 is just a fishing boat. Not worth any attention
Yet you took the time to watch the video!
@@symphorosayee3118
Me too, I watched this Vid - did You ?
003 is a bluddy JOKE of a ship, pathetic even....
@@bluddyrowdy8757 Sorry to disagree. I think it is you that is a pathetic joke!
China has built a powerful weapons arsenal to protect itself. We never invade others because we have suffered from being invaded by other countries in history.
Terrible enemies, they are about to catch up with us.
China isn't your enemy if you don't insist on trying to encircle it.
What this means is that the US will no longer be able to dominate them at home. China does not have the capability to invade the US. They are unlikely to ever gain that capability. They cannot even invade Japan today, or in the next 30 years. And Japan is a lot closer.
Thumbs up if you have less than 19500m². ;)
Lol😂😂
@@phillipward4934 😉😀😇
They managed to fix the cracks on the deck?
Washed off. Wouldn't be surprised if they painted it at night to drive westerners crazy.
Video suggestion.
Naval bases in the red sea region between America and china.
What is the current fleet of American vessels in the red sea region.
Do you think they retreated due to houthies getting hypersonic missiles off iran(backdoor from russia)
Being the exact opposite side of the world for America, can they force project in this region when its basically russia and chinas back yard?
Interesting. I'll give it some thought. I will be covering the Indian Ocean this year.
The Red Sea fight was what the LCS was built for. Twice.
@@danielch6662 under the assumption that America was the only world power.
I will be surprised if the Front Does Not Fall Off. Quality work??????
It's the year 2024, and the made-in-China quality joke is way out of its use-by date. Changing it to Boeing may be more precise, or maybe the UK's ever-leaking carrier?
You mean like Boeing Flying wheel & door 737 Max? 😂😂😂😂
Your phone was made in China.
Bro refuses to admit that more than 90 percent of the machines in his life come from China.
Yeah, we must throw away all our made in China stuffs out, starting we our phones. ☹️
Stop taxing the rich and corporations. We need to tax the poor and middle class. They've been slacking off for decades while billionaires struggle to pay for their mansions, yachts, and planes (and porn star hookers)
least obvious Trump reference
@@General_MacArthur Nope, Republican reference. But Trump is the greatest Republican President. He is what Republicans have always wanted but never thought God would provide us with one but now our prayers have been answered.
@@dennisnguyen8105 you’re referring to RINOs in that case
@@General_MacArthur There's only one true Republican and that is Trump. All previous Republican Presidents were pale imitation at best or fake deep cover Chinese sleeper agents. Lincoln was a Chinese sleeper agent, spoke perfect Mandarin and was caused the first Civil War to weaken us.
Aircraft carriers are tools for imperial control.
The idea of aircraft carriers being front line weapons in ww3 are outdated.
For the cost of 1 vunrable aircraft carrier, you can build tens of thousands of icbms which are more useful.
Ww2 carrier battles were from a time when the fog of war existed. It doesnt anymore.
Those are only good at fixed targets, or targets whose positions are constantly updated. Satellites are too fleeting and avoidable for such updates, so that information usually comes from... well, aircraft.
@@doujinflip are you talking about a war between peers like America vs china... Or are you talking about a imperial control mission... Like America off the coast of a second/third world nation.
The idea that a 15 billion$ target with 5000 sailors could be put at risk at anyone time within 3000 miles of an enemy's hypersonic missile system is just crazy...
Peers. Especially at sea where insurgents and casual combatants have nowhere to hide, so combat invariably favors the side with better technology and experience.
Also remember that hypersonics invariably create a plasma shield that blinds itself, while broadcasting a giant “hit me” sign to every other radar. For moving targets like warships, it requires external guidance all the way in, or slow down to the point that current air defenses are proven capable to intercept. And every hypersonic attempt costs like 100x as much as the next most expensive guided missile.
Copy paste
CDG, UK,s carrier, Italy one? All copy paste?
Most of the world was unaware that tofu drege built carriers😮
Just like US carrier task forces, they will last 7-30 minutes in an actual war. Why do you think the pulled the US carriers way back in the med? They are giant targets. Just more money for the MIC. Total waste.
Very powerful weapons wielded by an evil evil regime.
You mean usa?
Then you should be afraid!😂
Each day they get stronger!
The ship itself, however capable, sophisticated, and advanced it may, or may not be, is frankly not the issue.
The USN, UK, and French have been operating carriers of one type or anothr...for decades.
Operational readiness, combat sortie rates, procedures and actual day to day activities have been enhanced, updated, improved, and iterated upon for all these years.
Even if China pushed a true equivalent to even a Nimitz class carrier into the water, and put F-18E equivalent aircraft on its deck, that in no way represents a threat to the superiority of the capabilities of seasoned navies.
I have immediate family members with years of actual service, and no one considers the Chinese to be anywhere near the level of operational capability of our allies.
Typical armchair internet critics will 'hurrah' this launch as if it is a game-changer. It's not, China is two decades behind its adversaries' capabilities.
Apart from combat experience, realistic exercises conducted at high tempo are needed to display competence. Something that the U.S. and allies do.
If they attack NOW maybe this carrier will be useless.
If not NOW? Well its story for another day.
@@andrean2247 China's economy will tank?
China is 20 years behind. But in 10 years, they would only be 10 years behind instead of 30. Probably doesn't matter anyway. Big ships are big giant targets vulnerable to saturation attacks. And there would never be war between the US and China. Both have nukes, so neither can win.
China wasted all this money because they are scared of the US pulling further ahead. Even if large ships are obsolete, it is just simply too much risk to bet the whole country on missiles instead of carriers.
@@danielch6662The only one wasting money is the US.
Besides if they’re behind how the fuck they built stealth fighters decades ago, better yet the iPhone?
Was slave labor used to construct this tofu dreg ship? How many workers had to give up a kidney to keep working?
This was built by intellectuals and PLAN volunteers.
Most like the Uyghur slave labour that build this ship with their lives.
We should note that all these recently built Chinese military equipment from so called "stealth" aircraft to this aircraft carrier are completely untested in real world combat conditions.
Now while it is impossible for us private citizens to ascertain the technical competence of all this military equipment we can assume that the vast American intelligence gathering apparatus does have a comprehensive understanding of China's true capabilities which will guide American foreign policy.
Now seeing that American foreign policy towards China is becoming more assertive, making no concessions to China and instead increasing support for Taiwan one can conclude that the American intelligence conclusions on Chinese military capabilities is that America has absolutely nothing to worry about.
Thus is seems that all this new Chinese military equipment is substandard in quality and capabilities 🤔
So, were all the american military equipment/toys being tested? Against some weaklings that cannot fight back like Iraq, Libya, Syria or Afghanistan? Is this your definition of being tested in real battle when your enemy couldn't even fight back when the usa shut down the gps?
How's the war going in Afghanistan for 2 decades against goat herders in sandals? Losing 2 trillions of $ and fled the field with several dozens of billions of military equipment being left over and taken by the goat herders? Is this track record impressive?
Unless the usa fight the peer powers then we can say about the quality of usa military equipment, before that, the usa produced and manufactured military equipment/toys were and are still "GARBAGE" even in this modern era as of now.
I'm not even mentioning the below expectation performance by the so called best usa carrier called "FORD" class carrier, always these failures and those failures, the "EMALS" performed far below the expectation with the "AC" system.
The usa is a "PAPER CHIHUAHUA or PAPER POODLE" that try to pretend to look tough, if war break out, the usa military will be the first to flee the scene as far as possible. The usa is more like a "EXTREMELY OVERRATED GARBAGE COCKROACH", nothing more or nothing less, and let this sink in.
You make no sense and your so called logic is not logical at all.
Usa can't stop talking about China and worrying about China. If there's nothing to worry about they wouldn't be talking and doing actions to combat china and contain china in every single way possible 24/7.
that's a lot of cope
Would an assertive US be selling more obsolete junk to Taiwan premised on "urban guerilla warfare" (i.e. after the PLA has already landed in Taiwan) while proclaiming it "doesn't support Taiwan independence," and blustering about its mutual defence treaty with the Philippines, instead of sailing a fleet carrier through the Taiwan Strait and several destroyers to the Spratly islands face-to-face with the Chinese Coast Guard?
@@donderstorm1845 We are going to see a lot of cope in the coming days as 003 goes through its maiden voyage and sea trials. Expect to see more photos coming out once the PLAN gives the go-ahead for publicity. Then the copium is gonna be so much, it will be more common than sand.
Considering the unprofessional nature of chinese PLAN...makes me to wonder about what they plan on doing.. also, i wonder why russia hasnt tried to buy some of these
Because Russia has a different Navel strategy to counter the US Navy- build submarines,,,, lots and lots and lots of them....
Russia gave up on carriers. Also they currently have different priorities ie winning a war
只是觀光船...anglo不用担心...
Tourist ship then become man-made coral reef. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Well done
Thank you. Much appreciated.
Nice video. Very timely and quick update to match the sea trials. Eurasian naval insight seems to think that it will be 2026 at the earliest for the Fujian to be commissioned and fully operational. I tend to agree with him, or at least to have one with J-35s on it and not just J-15s.. which is possible for 2025 I guess if just J-15s. But what's the point of doing that? China isn't in the middle of an active war and doesn't need any bonus brownie points for a 2025 operational completion.
Overall, 2025 seems to be too soon, considering all the new systems(catapults) usedband even new aircraft on board. And not just one, but even 2 or more.. like the J-35, the KJ-500/600, other helicopters AND THEN on top any possible UACV or other UAV. Like using UAVs as part of the kill chain for carrier killing missiles which will work with the type 055 for long range carrier vs carrier group battles far out at sea like 2nd island chain or even further out. Better to work everything out fully and iron out all the wrinkles, otherwise China might end up like usa did with the Gerald R Ford and it's teething issues and endless problems.
Are you alright? You sound like you're having a hard time finding breath to just speak.. is if because you can't speaking naturally and using some unnatural "acting voice" to read a pre written script? Hehe.
There also seems to be a large number of anti China wankers and/or pro US who comment on your videos for some reason. They like to ignore or downplay any of China's massive development and modernization efforts. I get it though, since these developments are endless and lessen or entirely remove USAs global hegemony which they either support or have gotten used to since it's the only world they've ever known.
So while it's understandable, it's also quite disappointing since the videos produced are for the most part fact based and steer clear of shallow politics and picking sides. As a fellow Aussie, keep up the good work mate.
Thanks, much appreciated. I did say late 2025 at the earliest to be fully operational, but it could well be 2026.