thank you Nursekillam I spent more than 2 hours reading and trying to understand the difference among these terms. in less than 4 minutes i got the answer thank you again
Thanks for your videos - I've read 3 books on research methods and such for business research I'm doing and nothing came close to clarify what I needed to know than your videos! Thank you so much!
Thank you! I have been trying to understand the difference between models and theories and you made it so clear for me to understand...now I can work on my assignment with a clear head :)
tq for this video. very clear explanation! i also just bought the ebook Research terminology simplified: Paradigms, axiology, ontology, epistemology and methodology on google playstore.. trying to print it for easier reading...
ur videos r very useful....thank u 4 ur efforts one more little thing...i wish u but some resources and articles thats is related to the topic to broaden the knowledge thank you again..Caser saudi arabia
Thanks for your explanation. Could you please elaborate how conceptual frameworks are different from models? I am finding this a bit confusing since neither of them are proven.
How would you define the difference between a concept, and a construct? For me, a concept is less established in the literature than a construct. To me, a construct represents a concept that has been identified through factor analysis, and can be operationalized through measurement. Is this correct? And do you know of a book that explains this? Even if not on Amazon?
It's not the theories that are tested directly but the models.....all models must have a theoretical base.....that is if you undertaking quantitative study.
Thank you for this video, it is so clear! I looked into your book, but didn't see this specific information in there. Is there a source I can cite for my research paper? I can't cite youtube. :(
+Megan MacLean I'm happy it helped. I'm debating putting another book together but for now check out the references below the video. There is a PDF of one of Creswell's books too that could help ... It's a third edition ... I'll look on my computer sometime today and add the link below the video if it isn't already there.
Oops! I didn't post references for this one... probably because it came from my understanding based on a lot of readings. The readings for the course I taught at the time are not that great but you may be able to find something to help you ... (My earlier comment was about a different topic - Sorry) Duncan, C., Duff Cloutier, J., & Bailey, P.H. (2007). Concept analysis: the importance of differentiating the ontological focus. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(3), 293-300. Hebdon, M., Foli, K., & McComb, S. (2015). Survivor in the cancer context: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(8), 1774-1786. doi:10.1111/jan.12646 Hupcey, J.E., & Penrod, J. (2005). Concept analysis: examining the state of the science. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 19(2), 197-208. LoBiondo-Wood, G., Haber, J., Cameron, C., & Singh, M.D. (2013). Nursing research in Canada: Methods, critical appraisal, and utilization (3rd Edition). Toronto, Ontario: Mosby/Elsevier. (Chapter 2) McCauley, C. O., McKenna, H. P., Keeney, S., & McLaughlin, D. F. (2015). Concept analysis of recovery in mental illness in young adulthood. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(8), 579-589. doi:10.1111/jpm.12245 Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (pp. 451-452 & 482-483) Avant. K.C. (1993). The Wilson method of concept analysis. In B.L. Rogers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 51-60). Toronto: WB Saunders Company. Avant, K.C., & Abbott, C.A. (1993). Wilsonian concept analysis: applying the technique. In B.L. Rogers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 61-72). Toronto: WB Saunders Company. Chinn, P.L., & Kramer, M.K. (1991.) Nursing theory: an examination of the concept. In P.L. Chinn & M.K. Kramer, Theory and nursing: a systematic approach (pp. 57-77). London: Mosby Year Book. Cowles, K. (1996). Cultural perspectives of grief: an expanded concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(2), 287-294. Cowles, K.V., & Rodgers, B.L. (1993). The concept of grief: an evolutionary perspective. In B.L. Rodgers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 93-106). Toronto: WB Saunders Company. Eriksson, K. (2010. Concept determination as part of the development of knowledge in caring science. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24, 2-11. Doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00809.x Knafl, K.A., & Deatrick, J.A. (1993). Knowledge synthesis and concept development in nursing. In B.L. Rodgers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 35-50). Toronto: WB Saunders Company. Morse, J.M. (1995). Exploring the theoretical basis of nursing using advanced techniques of concept analysis. Advances in Nursing Science, 17(3), 31-46. Morse, J.M. & Doberneck, B. (1995). Delineating the concept of hope. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 27(4), 283-291. Morse, J.M., Mitcham, C., Hupcey, J.E., & Tasón, M.C. (1996). Criteria for concept evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 385-390. Morse, J.M., Solberg, S.M., Neander, W.L., Bottorff, J.I., & Johnson, J.I. (1990). Concepts of caring and caring as a concept. Advances in Nursing Science, 13, 1-4. Paley, J. (1996). How not to clarify concepts in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 572-578. Penrod, J., & Hupcey, J. (2005a). Enhancing methodological clarity: principle-based concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(4), 403-409. Penrod, J., & Hupcey, J.E. (2005b). Concept advancement: extending science through concept-driven research. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 19(3), 231-241. Hawks, J. (1991). Power: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16(6), 754-762. Wilson, J. (1963). Thinking with concepts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
thank you for your video, could you please tell me what are difference between ' characteristic' and ' definition' . why it is important to bring in your writing.'
People sometime talk about these things in different ways but I try to think of it as a definition tells you what something is and a characteristic is an important part of something that may or may not be used to help define it. So if you think of a car the definition may be that it is a motorized vehicle and a characteristic may be it's colour. In this case the colour wouldn't be part of the definition but would be useful in describing the colour. Does that make sense?
@@NurseKillam in logic we define concepts by definition and by description or characteristic. so in term of your goal and founded results data and informat you ll use among these two ways to tell your meaning .. and in scientific research you ought to find deep information to convence readers in your argue. to distinguish writing variables at theoritical frame work. then youll use Procedural definition to guarantee your goals gained..
NurseKillam Your reply is much appreciated. There is another term that I normally get confused with theory/model/concept and that is a 'framework'. Can you kindly explain the difference? It all boils down to fluency in the English language but English is not my first language.
I'm trying to to identify the framework of a research article as theoretical or conceptual but I'm struggling. In the beginning of the article the authors identify a model but do not explain or discuss it further (ie. "In accordance with the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, the HIV Continuum of Care Model instituted by CHS includes discharge planning services for people living with HIV/AIDS.") Would I still consider this to be a theoretical framework as a model has been identified?
It probably is but I would think if it guided the study that they would mention either the model or the components of it again (discharge planning maybe) ... It may have concepts in it that guide the study too.
Hi thanks for the great post. I have question regarding to the example you mentioned about the different views of what defines a garage and a shed. In this example are you trying to say that your husband is the one who does the house cleaning. LOL Yes I am a trouble maker, but this time it was just a joke. best regards.
Ok, but a garage or a shed is not an event, a situation nor an experience you just defined. It is a physical place, hence a noun. And then you add it is typically abstract and complex. But is noun "garage" abstract and is it complex? Probably. Heck i'm having a hard time ms.nurse and about to give up on finishing my masters, grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
I just used a garage or shed as an example because it is something most people can visualize. Sometimes concepts like pain are more easily identified than others. Please don't give up over something like this ... What do you need to know?
NurseKillam Hi. No worries, I got what you were pointing out when I watched it again. Hey thanks for being helpful. I appreciate it. Really. Five thumbs up! =)
IMO if you define a concept in another way, you are just not defining the same concept. You can only define *words* to be names for a given set of properties. this set of peroperties equals the concept you are defining. you might use the same word to talk about a different concept than somebody else though. why should we use the word concept in the way i just described? because otherwise we have no name for the thing you are defining...
You are right. That is why I have "proven" in quotations. People consider them closer to the "truth" than models. However, ongoing research is needed to explore and support them.
Nurse Killam, I am sweating this whole assignment out! I just can't get it to work. Please write me if you have the time to share some more information with me. Thank you. Sharon
thank you Nursekillam
I spent more than 2 hours reading and trying to understand the difference among these terms. in less than 4 minutes i got the answer thank you again
diane choudja Me too lol
you explained it well. thank you for taking time to make this video. keep posting
I'm happy it helped. Comments like this encourage me to keep posting :)
Thanks for your videos - I've read 3 books on research methods and such for business research I'm doing and nothing came close to clarify what I needed to know than your videos! Thank you so much!
Thank you! I have been trying to understand the difference between models and theories and you made it so clear for me to understand...now I can work on my assignment with a clear head :)
Very helpful, thank you for simplifying a very complex subject.
Well done. Helpful for my PhD studies as a refresher!
Thanks to helping on this!
tq for this video. very clear explanation! i also just bought the ebook Research terminology simplified: Paradigms, axiology, ontology, epistemology and methodology on google playstore.. trying to print it for easier reading...
So helpful
Thank you
Very good! Thanks from India
These are GREAT videos!
great video! Thank you so much this information was very helpful and easy to understand!
+shaw palmer Thank you.
The video is very informative, however the background music is very distracting.
I agree. I've stopped using background music. Sorry about that.
Very helpful. Thank you
Thank you again.
Hi, NurseKillam! Can you make a playlist for the topics? Thanks! I find your videos very helpful!
Thanks For you efforts.
Excellent, thank you!
Theory vs model is explained in tma-science.ie
Thank you very much for your help with this. I kept asking my tutor but all he told me was visit google..
+Wendy Sheffield you are welcome. It can be a hard thing to wrap your head around... It's one of those things that is debated
Thank you.
ur videos r very useful....thank u 4 ur efforts
one more little thing...i wish u but some resources and articles thats is related to the topic to broaden the knowledge thank you again..Caser saudi arabia
That's a good idea and I can do that for most of my videos. My computer crashed but when it's fixed I'll add some.
Very informative presentation :)
Thank you!
Excellent
Thanks for your explanation. Could you please elaborate how conceptual frameworks are different from models? I am finding this a bit confusing since neither of them are proven.
How would you define the difference between a concept, and a construct? For me, a concept is less established in the literature than a construct. To me, a construct represents a concept that has been identified through factor analysis, and can be operationalized through measurement. Is this correct? And do you know of a book that explains this? Even if not on Amazon?
Sounds like a reasonable way to look at it. I don't know of one off the top of my head but I can look into it.
Thank you, helpful
thank you!
very helpful
I'm happy it was helpful :)
thank u, its more helpful.
very helpful, thnx
You are welcome
It's not the theories that are tested directly but the models.....all models must have a theoretical base.....that is if you undertaking quantitative study.
Thank you for this video, it is so clear! I looked into your book, but didn't see this specific information in there. Is there a source I can cite for my research paper? I can't cite youtube. :(
+Megan MacLean I'm happy it helped. I'm debating putting another book together but for now check out the references below the video. There is a PDF of one of Creswell's books too that could help ... It's a third edition ... I'll look on my computer sometime today and add the link below the video if it isn't already there.
Oops! I didn't post references for this one... probably because it came from my understanding based on a lot of readings. The readings for the course I taught at the time are not that great but you may be able to find something to help you ... (My earlier comment was about a different topic - Sorry)
Duncan, C., Duff Cloutier, J., & Bailey, P.H. (2007). Concept analysis: the importance of differentiating the ontological focus. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(3), 293-300.
Hebdon, M., Foli, K., & McComb, S. (2015). Survivor in the cancer context: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(8), 1774-1786. doi:10.1111/jan.12646
Hupcey, J.E., & Penrod, J. (2005). Concept analysis: examining the state of the science. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 19(2), 197-208.
LoBiondo-Wood, G., Haber, J., Cameron, C., & Singh, M.D. (2013). Nursing research in Canada: Methods, critical appraisal, and utilization (3rd Edition). Toronto, Ontario: Mosby/Elsevier. (Chapter 2)
McCauley, C. O., McKenna, H. P., Keeney, S., & McLaughlin, D. F. (2015). Concept analysis of recovery in mental illness in young adulthood. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(8), 579-589. doi:10.1111/jpm.12245
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (pp. 451-452 & 482-483)
Avant. K.C. (1993). The Wilson method of concept analysis. In B.L. Rogers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 51-60). Toronto: WB Saunders Company.
Avant, K.C., & Abbott, C.A. (1993). Wilsonian concept analysis: applying the technique. In B.L. Rogers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 61-72). Toronto: WB Saunders Company.
Chinn, P.L., & Kramer, M.K. (1991.) Nursing theory: an examination of the concept. In P.L. Chinn & M.K. Kramer, Theory and nursing: a systematic approach (pp. 57-77). London: Mosby Year Book.
Cowles, K. (1996). Cultural perspectives of grief: an expanded concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(2), 287-294.
Cowles, K.V., & Rodgers, B.L. (1993). The concept of grief: an evolutionary perspective. In B.L. Rodgers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 93-106). Toronto: WB Saunders Company.
Eriksson, K. (2010. Concept determination as part of the development of knowledge in caring science. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24, 2-11. Doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00809.x
Knafl, K.A., & Deatrick, J.A. (1993). Knowledge synthesis and concept development in nursing. In B.L. Rodgers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 35-50). Toronto: WB Saunders Company.
Morse, J.M. (1995). Exploring the theoretical basis of nursing using advanced techniques of concept analysis. Advances in Nursing Science, 17(3), 31-46.
Morse, J.M. & Doberneck, B. (1995). Delineating the concept of hope. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 27(4), 283-291.
Morse, J.M., Mitcham, C., Hupcey, J.E., & Tasón, M.C. (1996). Criteria for concept evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 385-390.
Morse, J.M., Solberg, S.M., Neander, W.L., Bottorff, J.I., & Johnson, J.I. (1990). Concepts of caring and caring as a concept. Advances in Nursing Science, 13, 1-4.
Paley, J. (1996). How not to clarify concepts in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 572-578.
Penrod, J., & Hupcey, J. (2005a). Enhancing methodological clarity: principle-based concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(4), 403-409.
Penrod, J., & Hupcey, J.E. (2005b). Concept advancement: extending science through concept-driven research. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 19(3), 231-241.
Hawks, J. (1991). Power: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16(6), 754-762.
Wilson, J. (1963). Thinking with concepts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Megan MacLean
Do you have any kind of book that good to help me to understand the concepual framwork.
thank you for your video, could you please tell me what are difference between ' characteristic' and ' definition' . why it is important to bring in your writing.'
People sometime talk about these things in different ways but I try to think of it as a definition tells you what something is and a characteristic is an important part of something that may or may not be used to help define it. So if you think of a car the definition may be that it is a motorized vehicle and a characteristic may be it's colour. In this case the colour wouldn't be part of the definition but would be useful in describing the colour. Does that make sense?
@@NurseKillam
in logic we define concepts by definition and by description or characteristic. so in term of your goal and founded results data and informat you ll use among these two ways to tell your meaning .. and in scientific research you ought to find deep information to convence readers in your argue.
to distinguish writing variables at theoritical frame work. then youll use Procedural definition to guarantee your goals gained..
Very helpful! So in conclusion, a theory was once a model, and a model was once a concept?
That is one way to look at it. I like that way but some philosophers would say it is more complex than that. But basically yes :)
NurseKillam Your reply is much appreciated. There is another term that I normally get confused with theory/model/concept and that is a 'framework'. Can you kindly explain the difference? It all boils down to fluency in the English language but English is not my first language.
any resources about components and elements of theory? thank you
I'll take a look when I have a chance. My baby is keeping me away from the computer a lot.
I'm trying to to identify the framework of a research article as theoretical or conceptual but I'm struggling. In the beginning of the article the authors identify a model but do not explain or discuss it further (ie. "In accordance with the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, the HIV Continuum of Care Model instituted by CHS includes discharge planning services for people living with HIV/AIDS.") Would I still consider this to be a theoretical framework as a model has been identified?
It probably is but I would think if it guided the study that they would mention either the model or the components of it again (discharge planning maybe) ... It may have concepts in it that guide the study too.
can u say the difference between physical model and empirical model ?
nagasai mallela do you mean a physical model as in a statue of something? Empirical means based on evidence.
Hi thanks for the great post. I have question regarding to the example you mentioned about the different views of what defines a garage and a shed. In this example are you trying to say that your husband is the one who does the house cleaning. LOL Yes I am a trouble maker, but this time it was just a joke. best regards.
Lol. We both clean some but in that example it's my son we are trying to get to clean. Yes my husband cleans too :)
Ok, but a garage or a shed is not an event, a situation nor an experience you just defined. It is a physical place, hence a noun. And then you add it is typically abstract and complex. But is noun "garage" abstract and is it complex? Probably. Heck i'm having a hard time ms.nurse and about to give up on finishing my masters, grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
I just used a garage or shed as an example because it is something most people can visualize. Sometimes concepts like pain are more easily identified than others. Please don't give up over something like this ... What do you need to know?
--
NurseKillam Hi. No worries, I got what you were pointing out when I watched it again. Hey thanks for being helpful. I appreciate it. Really. Five thumbs up! =)
hi, Real Philippines. Did you finish the program?
are there theories that don't have conceptual models? How is that possible?
I believe so. I'd need to look up an example. I just want to clarify if you are referring to graphic displays of the theory as a "conceptual model"
Yes
IMO if you define a concept in another way, you are just not defining the same concept. You can only define *words* to be names for a given set of properties. this set of peroperties equals the concept you are defining. you might use the same word to talk about a different concept than somebody else though.
why should we use the word concept in the way i just described? because otherwise we have no name for the thing you are defining...
Theories cannot be proven, but they can be support by evidence
You are right. That is why I have "proven" in quotations. People consider them closer to the "truth" than models. However, ongoing research is needed to explore and support them.
But... who confuses a garage with a shed? 🤔
Nurse Killam, I am sweating this whole assignment out! I just can't get it to work. Please write me if you have the time to share some more information with me. Thank you. Sharon
What kind of information are you looking for?
sorry !!!! but why in hell you put music in a such good video why ruined uff
Thanks. Very helpful
very informative. thank-you
You are welcome :)