The difference between Concepts Models and Theories

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 80

  • @dianechoudja2035
    @dianechoudja2035 10 років тому +20

    thank you Nursekillam
    I spent more than 2 hours reading and trying to understand the difference among these terms. in less than 4 minutes i got the answer thank you again

  • @sania7549
    @sania7549 8 років тому

    Thanks for your videos - I've read 3 books on research methods and such for business research I'm doing and nothing came close to clarify what I needed to know than your videos! Thank you so much!

  • @judym38
    @judym38 8 років тому +1

    Thank you! I have been trying to understand the difference between models and theories and you made it so clear for me to understand...now I can work on my assignment with a clear head :)

  • @CRuma-ut9hl
    @CRuma-ut9hl 4 роки тому +1

    you explained it well. thank you for taking time to make this video. keep posting

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  4 роки тому

      I'm happy it helped. Comments like this encourage me to keep posting :)

  • @PeacocksFly
    @PeacocksFly 8 років тому

    Well done. Helpful for my PhD studies as a refresher!

  • @tameracorsaro2585
    @tameracorsaro2585 5 років тому

    Very helpful, thank you for simplifying a very complex subject.

  • @farheenahmed4683
    @farheenahmed4683 4 роки тому

    Thanks for your explanation. Could you please elaborate how conceptual frameworks are different from models? I am finding this a bit confusing since neither of them are proven.

  • @shane.283
    @shane.283 4 роки тому

    Hi, NurseKillam! Can you make a playlist for the topics? Thanks! I find your videos very helpful!

  • @brentward5739
    @brentward5739 9 років тому

    How would you define the difference between a concept, and a construct? For me, a concept is less established in the literature than a construct. To me, a construct represents a concept that has been identified through factor analysis, and can be operationalized through measurement. Is this correct? And do you know of a book that explains this? Even if not on Amazon?

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  9 років тому

      Sounds like a reasonable way to look at it. I don't know of one off the top of my head but I can look into it.

  • @awwalbadiru1802
    @awwalbadiru1802 3 роки тому

    Thanks to helping on this!

  • @kenandmarykatemcmillan3225
    @kenandmarykatemcmillan3225 5 років тому +3

    The video is very informative, however the background music is very distracting.

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  5 років тому

      I agree. I've stopped using background music. Sorry about that.

  • @t.s.p5669
    @t.s.p5669 5 років тому

    Very good! Thanks from India

  • @dmitriypiscunov3733
    @dmitriypiscunov3733 4 роки тому

    Theory vs model is explained in tma-science.ie

  • @hidayataziz619
    @hidayataziz619 8 років тому

    thank you for your video, could you please tell me what are difference between ' characteristic' and ' definition' . why it is important to bring in your writing.'

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  8 років тому +2

      People sometime talk about these things in different ways but I try to think of it as a definition tells you what something is and a characteristic is an important part of something that may or may not be used to help define it. So if you think of a car the definition may be that it is a motorized vehicle and a characteristic may be it's colour. In this case the colour wouldn't be part of the definition but would be useful in describing the colour. Does that make sense?

    • @qassimjamal7763
      @qassimjamal7763 5 років тому

      @@NurseKillam
      in logic we define concepts by definition and by description or characteristic. so in term of your goal and founded results data and informat you ll use among these two ways to tell your meaning .. and in scientific research you ought to find deep information to convence readers in your argue.
      to distinguish writing variables at theoritical frame work. then youll use Procedural definition to guarantee your goals gained..

  • @lauriecl269
    @lauriecl269 11 років тому +1

    These are GREAT videos!

  • @mariahcroft1238
    @mariahcroft1238 9 років тому

    I'm trying to to identify the framework of a research article as theoretical or conceptual but I'm struggling. In the beginning of the article the authors identify a model but do not explain or discuss it further (ie. "In accordance with the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, the HIV Continuum of Care Model instituted by CHS includes discharge planning services for people living with HIV/AIDS.") Would I still consider this to be a theoretical framework as a model has been identified?

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  9 років тому

      It probably is but I would think if it guided the study that they would mention either the model or the components of it again (discharge planning maybe) ... It may have concepts in it that guide the study too.

  • @justbegentle
    @justbegentle 5 років тому

    tq for this video. very clear explanation! i also just bought the ebook Research terminology simplified: Paradigms, axiology, ontology, epistemology and methodology on google playstore.. trying to print it for easier reading...

  • @casserjai9353
    @casserjai9353 10 років тому

    any resources about components and elements of theory? thank you

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  10 років тому

      I'll take a look when I have a chance. My baby is keeping me away from the computer a lot.

  • @nagasaimallela3974
    @nagasaimallela3974 7 років тому

    can u say the difference between physical model and empirical model ?

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  7 років тому

      nagasai mallela do you mean a physical model as in a statue of something? Empirical means based on evidence.

  • @shawpalmer1280
    @shawpalmer1280 9 років тому

    great video! Thank you so much this information was very helpful and easy to understand!

  • @n8thal718
    @n8thal718 5 років тому

    Thank you again.

  • @qusay_network1139
    @qusay_network1139 10 років тому

    Thanks For you efforts.

  • @meganmaclean4712
    @meganmaclean4712 7 років тому +1

    Thank you for this video, it is so clear! I looked into your book, but didn't see this specific information in there. Is there a source I can cite for my research paper? I can't cite youtube. :(

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  7 років тому

      +Megan MacLean I'm happy it helped. I'm debating putting another book together but for now check out the references below the video. There is a PDF of one of Creswell's books too that could help ... It's a third edition ... I'll look on my computer sometime today and add the link below the video if it isn't already there.

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  7 років тому

      Oops! I didn't post references for this one... probably because it came from my understanding based on a lot of readings. The readings for the course I taught at the time are not that great but you may be able to find something to help you ... (My earlier comment was about a different topic - Sorry)
      Duncan, C., Duff Cloutier, J., & Bailey, P.H. (2007). Concept analysis: the importance of differentiating the ontological focus. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(3), 293-300.
      Hebdon, M., Foli, K., & McComb, S. (2015). Survivor in the cancer context: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(8), 1774-1786. doi:10.1111/jan.12646
      Hupcey, J.E., & Penrod, J. (2005). Concept analysis: examining the state of the science. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice: An International Journal, 19(2), 197-208.
      LoBiondo-Wood, G., Haber, J., Cameron, C., & Singh, M.D. (2013). Nursing research in Canada: Methods, critical appraisal, and utilization (3rd Edition). Toronto, Ontario: Mosby/Elsevier. (Chapter 2)
      McCauley, C. O., McKenna, H. P., Keeney, S., & McLaughlin, D. F. (2015). Concept analysis of recovery in mental illness in young adulthood. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(8), 579-589. doi:10.1111/jpm.12245
      Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (pp. 451-452 & 482-483)
      Avant. K.C. (1993). The Wilson method of concept analysis. In B.L. Rogers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 51-60). Toronto: WB Saunders Company.
      Avant, K.C., & Abbott, C.A. (1993). Wilsonian concept analysis: applying the technique. In B.L. Rogers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 61-72). Toronto: WB Saunders Company.
      Chinn, P.L., & Kramer, M.K. (1991.) Nursing theory: an examination of the concept. In P.L. Chinn & M.K. Kramer, Theory and nursing: a systematic approach (pp. 57-77). London: Mosby Year Book.
      Cowles, K. (1996). Cultural perspectives of grief: an expanded concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(2), 287-294.
      Cowles, K.V., & Rodgers, B.L. (1993). The concept of grief: an evolutionary perspective. In B.L. Rodgers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 93-106). Toronto: WB Saunders Company.
      Eriksson, K. (2010. Concept determination as part of the development of knowledge in caring science. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24, 2-11. Doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00809.x
      Knafl, K.A., & Deatrick, J.A. (1993). Knowledge synthesis and concept development in nursing. In B.L. Rodgers & K.A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications (pp. 35-50). Toronto: WB Saunders Company.
      Morse, J.M. (1995). Exploring the theoretical basis of nursing using advanced techniques of concept analysis. Advances in Nursing Science, 17(3), 31-46.
      Morse, J.M. & Doberneck, B. (1995). Delineating the concept of hope. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 27(4), 283-291.
      Morse, J.M., Mitcham, C., Hupcey, J.E., & Tasón, M.C. (1996). Criteria for concept evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 385-390.
      Morse, J.M., Solberg, S.M., Neander, W.L., Bottorff, J.I., & Johnson, J.I. (1990). Concepts of caring and caring as a concept. Advances in Nursing Science, 13, 1-4.
      Paley, J. (1996). How not to clarify concepts in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 572-578.
      Penrod, J., & Hupcey, J. (2005a). Enhancing methodological clarity: principle-based concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(4), 403-409.
      Penrod, J., & Hupcey, J.E. (2005b). Concept advancement: extending science through concept-driven research. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 19(3), 231-241.
      Hawks, J. (1991). Power: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16(6), 754-762.
      Wilson, J. (1963). Thinking with concepts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    • @libyaonly.1021
      @libyaonly.1021 7 років тому

      Megan MacLean
      Do you have any kind of book that good to help me to understand the concepual framwork.

  • @casserjai9353
    @casserjai9353 10 років тому

    ur videos r very useful....thank u 4 ur efforts
    one more little thing...i wish u but some resources and articles thats is related to the topic to broaden the knowledge thank you again..Caser saudi arabia

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  10 років тому

      That's a good idea and I can do that for most of my videos. My computer crashed but when it's fixed I'll add some.

  • @kyisha6237
    @kyisha6237 9 років тому

    are there theories that don't have conceptual models? How is that possible?

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  8 років тому

      I believe so. I'd need to look up an example. I just want to clarify if you are referring to graphic displays of the theory as a "conceptual model"

    • @kyisha6237
      @kyisha6237 8 років тому

      Yes

  • @azar8538
    @azar8538 7 років тому

    Thank you.

  • @wendysheffieldspiritualauthor
    @wendysheffieldspiritualauthor 7 років тому

    Thank you very much for your help with this. I kept asking my tutor but all he told me was visit google..

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  7 років тому

      +Wendy Sheffield you are welcome. It can be a hard thing to wrap your head around... It's one of those things that is debated

  • @ReeAmor
    @ReeAmor 6 років тому

    Excellent, thank you!

  • @tkalan04
    @tkalan04 10 років тому

    Thanks. Very helpful

  • @Ronriko1
    @Ronriko1 5 років тому

    It's not the theories that are tested directly but the models.....all models must have a theoretical base.....that is if you undertaking quantitative study.

  • @prof.dr.saadullahafridi2962
    @prof.dr.saadullahafridi2962 8 років тому

    Excellent

  • @ichariley
    @ichariley 9 років тому

    Very helpful! So in conclusion, a theory was once a model, and a model was once a concept?

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  9 років тому

      That is one way to look at it. I like that way but some philosophers would say it is more complex than that. But basically yes :)

    • @ichariley
      @ichariley 9 років тому

      NurseKillam Your reply is much appreciated. There is another term that I normally get confused with theory/model/concept and that is a 'framework'. Can you kindly explain the difference? It all boils down to fluency in the English language but English is not my first language.

  • @HassanElkatawneh
    @HassanElkatawneh 8 років тому

    Hi thanks for the great post. I have question regarding to the example you mentioned about the different views of what defines a garage and a shed. In this example are you trying to say that your husband is the one who does the house cleaning. LOL Yes I am a trouble maker, but this time it was just a joke. best regards.

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  8 років тому +1

      Lol. We both clean some but in that example it's my son we are trying to get to clean. Yes my husband cleans too :)

  • @johnmarkgutierrez1599
    @johnmarkgutierrez1599 10 років тому

    Very informative presentation :)

  • @realphilippines8031
    @realphilippines8031 9 років тому

    Ok, but a garage or a shed is not an event, a situation nor an experience you just defined. It is a physical place, hence a noun. And then you add it is typically abstract and complex. But is noun "garage" abstract and is it complex? Probably. Heck i'm having a hard time ms.nurse and about to give up on finishing my masters, grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  9 років тому

      I just used a garage or shed as an example because it is something most people can visualize. Sometimes concepts like pain are more easily identified than others. Please don't give up over something like this ... What do you need to know?

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  9 років тому

      --

    • @realphilippines8031
      @realphilippines8031 9 років тому +1

      NurseKillam Hi. No worries, I got what you were pointing out when I watched it again. Hey thanks for being helpful. I appreciate it. Really. Five thumbs up! =)

    • @anniebrownsimon7713
      @anniebrownsimon7713 6 років тому

      hi, Real Philippines. Did you finish the program?

  • @mathewkiio6771
    @mathewkiio6771 10 років тому

    very helpful

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  10 років тому

      I'm happy it was helpful :)

  • @teegee2261
    @teegee2261 8 років тому

    Thank you, helpful

  • @abdirahmanbarud2636
    @abdirahmanbarud2636 6 років тому

    thank u, its more helpful.

  • @sheroneca
    @sheroneca 8 років тому

    thank you!

  • @staceyweekes7204
    @staceyweekes7204 10 років тому

    very helpful, thnx

  • @paulfrischknecht3999
    @paulfrischknecht3999 4 роки тому

    IMO if you define a concept in another way, you are just not defining the same concept. You can only define *words* to be names for a given set of properties. this set of peroperties equals the concept you are defining. you might use the same word to talk about a different concept than somebody else though.
    why should we use the word concept in the way i just described? because otherwise we have no name for the thing you are defining...

  • @kss8148
    @kss8148 10 років тому

    Theories cannot be proven, but they can be support by evidence

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  10 років тому

      You are right. That is why I have "proven" in quotations. People consider them closer to the "truth" than models. However, ongoing research is needed to explore and support them.

  • @nonononodont
    @nonononodont 6 років тому

    But... who confuses a garage with a shed? 🤔

  • @sharoneames3267
    @sharoneames3267 10 років тому

    Nurse Killam, I am sweating this whole assignment out! I just can't get it to work. Please write me if you have the time to share some more information with me. Thank you. Sharon

    • @NurseKillam
      @NurseKillam  10 років тому

      What kind of information are you looking for?

  • @cryplots2815
    @cryplots2815 2 роки тому

    sorry !!!! but why in hell you put music in a such good video why ruined uff

  • @MennaTallah11
    @MennaTallah11 10 років тому +2

    So helpful
    Thank you

  • @findingmedicine3164
    @findingmedicine3164 6 років тому

    Very helpful. Thank you

  • @abinelsrn
    @abinelsrn 10 років тому +1

    very informative. thank-you