@@MegaSpideymanPersonally, I find it a bit disrespectful to those who sent in Superchats. Although they get potentially double the exposure for their money, I think it’s pretty bad they get completely forgotten about in a matter of three days to the point that Drinker doesn’t even recognize the question or the resulting discussions. It also makes me feel like I’m wasting my time watching these Last Orders because so much of it is a repeat.
MauLer: Makes fun of Drinker for reading the same superchat twice in one week Also MauLer: Waits seven months to read superchats once. *EDIT* Also, also MauLer: Accidentally RE-records the same entire superchat catchup and releases separately (twice) and doesn't realise until the third time it happened.
I'm sure Mauler has also accidentally doubled a superchat video at least twice. E.g. made a superchat catch up video and then answered the same questions again a couple of weeks from the same video. He might have even done it three times.
Happy Merry New Year, gents! As others have noted, pretty much all the chats were covered up through the one about Nosferatu. Kudos to Drinker for answering the Shakespeare question with, "Tommy Wiseau" both times! --As for the controversy regarding the trans character, one side is opposed to the normalization of it, the other side is miffed because no one had to embrace the lie. One of the best ways to get society to accept something it rejects is to include it in entertainment. Feature it innocuously in stories, and gradually increase its role, scope, and appeal. There are so many ways to go with, "I'm in the competition for surgery" that would be far more relatable, interesting, or sympathetic to far more people; the choice to make it a surgery to butcher anatomy makes almost no sense unless it is to normalize the concept. We have already seen where this leads, but fortunately more people are perceiving it with their mind and not their emotions, and are rejecting its implementation and normalization. But if you spend 10-15 years gradually making more likable characters with compelling stories, you can create an artificial connection with the audience (and, eventually society) that will foster sentimentality and advocacy. If history is any indication, the society that rejected this outright now will be embracing it in another twenty years (if not sooner) and allowing those folks to "live their truth"--which includes allowing things that we currently find abhorrent. On the other side of things, activists are interested in control and in goading, cowing, or coercing society to cast aside truth and embrace a lie. They want you to know the person you are looking at isn't a man, and yet declare it to be so. That's what the pronoun push has been about. "Refer to me by the truth I've determined, rather than what you know the truth to be". Ironically, activists don't care what happens in the confines of the false world (unless it in any way portrays their champion in an unflattering way)--they care about making people knowingly embrace a lie in reality. They don't want a real man playing a woman who transitioned into a man, because the reality is he's still a man. They want the fiction on screen to reflect the fiction they are pushing in the real world as well. Again, this is for the activists who are the ones making noise about this, not the folks who are just trying to sort out their lives the best way they can. There is a notable difference between those who, healthy or not, would rather people not know their true sex, and those who want you to know their true sex but refer to and relate to them as something else.
Actually, I think Shakespeare might be one of the few people who could find apt words to describe Boogie2988. He has written some weird degenerate characters, like Caliban in the Tempest.
You can absolutely narrow down a film to a decade based on the cast if the movie had an attractive female love interest. Most of these actresses have a fairly short shelf life.
i thought the first vote was abit weird because if it wasn't a draw his vote wouldn't of mattered and the game would of been over. i understand it was for tension but still
Squid Game. Like most of my brilliant ideas, no sooner have I come up with it than a movie or TV show comes out with exactly the same plot (and don't get me started on how I invented Windows back in the 1970s). With Squid Game, my idea was a game that starts with a thousand people and is then whittled down to one, with the 999 losers all dying. The prize, to make it believable that people would take part, is literally anything that can be had in the real world; if you win, you get your literal heart's desire. (I planned on coming up with an ironic downbeat ending in which the winner was a dipshit whose big wish was really lame.)
With The Witcher 4 stuff, we do not know how Ciri will really look in game since what we have seen is a cgi trailer. Based on how different everyone including Geralt looked in the Wild Hunt cgi trailers they are not a great representation of final in game looks. The real concern should be coming from the devs attitude they have.
I care less about how she looks than them confirming the ending of Witcher 3. Not to mention the fact that the devs are talking about how this game will focus on women's place in medieval society when one of the endings of 3 is Ciri becoming Empress.
Drinkler clearly blacked out about 20 minutes before the end of Open Bar, and forgot he'd already answered those chats.
So everything as usual. 👍
Are you implying the Drinker got drunk?
We all love Last Orders with these two, feels more personal.
Even with the reruns?
They got an underrated bromance imo
@@SumDumGy That can be a little frustrating, but as long as the various questions are getting answered, that's what matters.
@@MegaSpideymanPersonally, I find it a bit disrespectful to those who sent in Superchats. Although they get potentially double the exposure for their money, I think it’s pretty bad they get completely forgotten about in a matter of three days to the point that Drinker doesn’t even recognize the question or the resulting discussions.
It also makes me feel like I’m wasting my time watching these Last Orders because so much of it is a repeat.
@@SumDumGy I suppose I can understand that.
The irony of Drinker forgetting his Shakespeare writing about a modern day celebrity question and then still giving the exact same answer anyways
Sneeking a listen while at work, great
Happy New Year to you both ❤️
Cheers Drinker and I hope you do get better 🫂
0:40 It's a mystery why Drinker forgot about the last 20 minutes of Open Bar
Not really.. wasnt he just come back home from long flight etc?
MauLer: Makes fun of Drinker for reading the same superchat twice in one week
Also MauLer: Waits seven months to read superchats once.
*EDIT* Also, also MauLer: Accidentally RE-records the same entire superchat catchup and releases separately (twice) and doesn't realise until the third time it happened.
I'm sure Mauler has also accidentally doubled a superchat video at least twice. E.g. made a superchat catch up video and then answered the same questions again a couple of weeks from the same video. He might have even done it three times.
@@PleasantSkulman Maybe so.
@@PleasantSkulman he 100% did. it was funny when he found out like a week later
@@PleasantSkulman He actually did it twice and almost a third time. It's all jokes.
After 1 bottle of Jack he forgets all superchats form Open Bar 124. & Repeats them in last orders I love it tho
We need a until Dawn play through drinker
Also get well soon. Drinker 🤞❤️🙏
Bend the knee to David Lynch.
The one true king of DUNE adaptations
Happy Merry New Year, gents! As others have noted, pretty much all the chats were covered up through the one about Nosferatu. Kudos to Drinker for answering the Shakespeare question with, "Tommy Wiseau" both times! --As for the controversy regarding the trans character, one side is opposed to the normalization of it, the other side is miffed because no one had to embrace the lie. One of the best ways to get society to accept something it rejects is to include it in entertainment. Feature it innocuously in stories, and gradually increase its role, scope, and appeal. There are so many ways to go with, "I'm in the competition for surgery" that would be far more relatable, interesting, or sympathetic to far more people; the choice to make it a surgery to butcher anatomy makes almost no sense unless it is to normalize the concept. We have already seen where this leads, but fortunately more people are perceiving it with their mind and not their emotions, and are rejecting its implementation and normalization. But if you spend 10-15 years gradually making more likable characters with compelling stories, you can create an artificial connection with the audience (and, eventually society) that will foster sentimentality and advocacy. If history is any indication, the society that rejected this outright now will be embracing it in another twenty years (if not sooner) and allowing those folks to "live their truth"--which includes allowing things that we currently find abhorrent.
On the other side of things, activists are interested in control and in goading, cowing, or coercing society to cast aside truth and embrace a lie. They want you to know the person you are looking at isn't a man, and yet declare it to be so. That's what the pronoun push has been about. "Refer to me by the truth I've determined, rather than what you know the truth to be". Ironically, activists don't care what happens in the confines of the false world (unless it in any way portrays their champion in an unflattering way)--they care about making people knowingly embrace a lie in reality. They don't want a real man playing a woman who transitioned into a man, because the reality is he's still a man. They want the fiction on screen to reflect the fiction they are pushing in the real world as well.
Again, this is for the activists who are the ones making noise about this, not the folks who are just trying to sort out their lives the best way they can. There is a notable difference between those who, healthy or not, would rather people not know their true sex, and those who want you to know their true sex but refer to and relate to them as something else.
Funny cause last week he read off 10+ supers that he already did and neither noticed
Actually, I think Shakespeare might be one of the few people who could find apt words to describe Boogie2988. He has written some weird degenerate characters, like Caliban in the Tempest.
1 Minute , No Views !
Your channel was amazing while it lasted Drinker !
Greetings from Greece , love your stuff ! 😁😁😁
I have a feeling I'm gonna be listening to yall until your 90 [BAD Deadpool (D.P.?) reference, but also probly true]!
Get well soon Drinker!
I like the lost out in the Idaho wilderness show the best.
@@GeorgeFloyd2023 What's that?
On today’s episode of “50% Rehash…”
The version of Squid game they want exists, it was a manga called Liar game that later got several live-action adeptation.
what an intro 😂😂 had to pause after 20 seconds of you talking just to laugh and share
Bot 4
@Sebassie ure a bot 🤣 nah...last i checked I'm real
Can't believe how good this is. You always deliver!
Bot 1
@@HenryKinross Interactions help the bots.
@@HenryKinrossjust report it as spam and move on
Saving for later 32:26-32:50
You can absolutely narrow down a film to a decade based on the cast if the movie had an attractive female love interest. Most of these actresses have a fairly short shelf life.
Immediately reads a chat that was already read.
Squid game being beaten for most of the week by wwe raw must be talked about
Praise be to space king
Please. Someone. Bring up Rogue elements 😂😂😂😂😂
Mr. Inbetween review damn it!
i thought the first vote was abit weird because if it wasn't a draw his vote wouldn't of mattered and the game would of been over. i understand it was for tension but still
I'd rather watch the Punisher with Ray stevenston than squid game
Kingdom Come medieval fantasy? Couldn't be more wrong if you tried
Are the characters, and event historical and accurate? Places are i think real.
@schwartzy65 main char probably not, but all lords and events are, with a twist to fit the game of course
Squid Game. Like most of my brilliant ideas, no sooner have I come up with it than a movie or TV show comes out with exactly the same plot (and don't get me started on how I invented Windows back in the 1970s). With Squid Game, my idea was a game that starts with a thousand people and is then whittled down to one, with the 999 losers all dying. The prize, to make it believable that people would take part, is literally anything that can be had in the real world; if you win, you get your literal heart's desire. (I planned on coming up with an ironic downbeat ending in which the winner was a dipshit whose big wish was really lame.)
@@paulware4701 Sorry about that.
Drink some whiskey you'll feel alot better drinker
Delighted to see this up now! What a wonderful late night surprise.
As dean Winchester said I'm a painted whore....that's all actors are...lol
That's all they've ever been.
With The Witcher 4 stuff, we do not know how Ciri will really look in game since what we have seen is a cgi trailer. Based on how different everyone including Geralt looked in the Wild Hunt cgi trailers they are not a great representation of final in game looks. The real concern should be coming from the devs attitude they have.
People saying that ciri looks ugly are so cringe
My thoughts exactly, it's curious how this argument about the difference between CG and ingame graphics is missing from the discussion.
I care less about how she looks than them confirming the ending of Witcher 3. Not to mention the fact that the devs are talking about how this game will focus on women's place in medieval society when one of the endings of 3 is Ciri becoming Empress.
Best hunter:
Sabertooth
Kraven
Deadpool
Wolverine? 🤔🎉
Probably Wolverine. And you?
Sabertooth is confirmed a better hunter than wolverine and wolverine is better than the other 2 in terms of hunting skills
so Sabertooth
How have they not heard about abygail
@@bookdeannow Ah, there's so many movies, you're bound to miss a few.
So this is just... a re-reading of the same chats from the night.
ones they missed
One's that they missed
When God made Adam, it was just a failed attempt to recreate Chuck Norris.
I never watched squid game so i don't nothing about the show I thought the show was crap from the start
Constipated drinker sounds like a londoner
...do you mean congested? 😳
@@kevinoneil5120 nope lol
fell off
Squid game has yet to fall off despite the creator being a cringe "anti-capitalism" dude
If that's what you mean
564
Drink some whiskey you'll feel alot better drinker